# MetaMask & Team Respond

By [Untitled](https://paragraph.com/@0xb27c628b8a5b93fe86e8efa0871bb5d3830de4b6) · 2022-11-26

---

Responding to the arguments made by experts and the crypto community as a whole, MetaMask tried to clear the air by stating that nothing had changed in their privacy policy and it was a mere misunderstanding.

> _The language in our privacy policy was updated on November 23rd._
> 
> _Nothing has changed in the way MetaMask and Infura operate._
> 
> _Here’s a statement clarifying what we do with user data (spoiler: nothing)._[_https://t.co/4dDKMvcMvv_](https://t.co/4dDKMvcMvv)
> 
> _— MetaMask 🦊💙 (@MetaMask)_ [_November 24, 2022_](https://twitter.com/MetaMask/status/1595844348888883200?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

Joseph Lubin, CEO of Consensys & Ethereum’s co-founder, also chimed in to fight accusations of stealing user privacy through the MetaMask app.

He vehemently denied MetaMask being operated by Consensys and added that it was the end-users who operate the app. According to him, Consensys just played the part in developing the software.

Talking about RPC, he pointed that,

---

*Originally published on [Untitled](https://paragraph.com/@0xb27c628b8a5b93fe86e8efa0871bb5d3830de4b6/metamask-team-respond)*