# Judy is my hero 🦸

By [Mars Robertson](https://paragraph.com/@dearmoon) · 2023-05-17

---

Bold opening statement: I’m prepared to die.

Disclaimer: I’ll accomplish more in life by staying alive.

Policy on dying: it was worth it.

Policy on jail: it was worth it.

![https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/euthanasia-and-assisted-suicide/](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/1279dc6fdb4b2aa11c7643e1675029732113a636efc506d89d586c353e0c383c.png)

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/euthanasia-and-assisted-suicide/

![Jurisdiction shopping](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/4f2b2bd0ac11d9ed5204ef17f45bd3bbd3f56b73ead4caef8d86813237ee70f1.png)

Jurisdiction shopping

![https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/the-burning-monk-1963/](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/46eed8dd57308175f643125f6c8b75d32fce4d3c0bba0e5655217a22f691d73d.png)

https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/the-burning-monk-1963/

![Sometimes I wish it was possible to say what I really think but instead use a "jigsaw" writing style - honoring Craig Murray who was jailed for jigsaw identification](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/e778705c42efaaa65b0032d6ab2b19a6fa5948b4216fa249b96a1826b4f9c981.png)

Sometimes I wish it was possible to say what I really think but instead use a "jigsaw" writing style - honoring Craig Murray who was jailed for jigsaw identification

Controversial laws
==================

![https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/07d34b9a5f5af49b29af681fdd3e849405939078c7219a97f07f5316dfb25658.png)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic

[https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/14/patrick-thelwell-eggs-king-charles-york](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/14/patrick-thelwell-eggs-king-charles-york)

> _“intended to cause King Charles to believe immediate unlawful violence would be used against him”_

**Intended to cause to believe.**

Pretty cool word soup.

### Certificate of an attempt.

### An attempt at certification.

![Work in progress, A B C D E F G... One leads to another. Nuanced meaning though.](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/27b658a9533b6edbd2afbe76827ea1d6f4f738607d711969ee593f645b832f9d.png)

Work in progress, A B C D E F G... One leads to another. Nuanced meaning though.

![Simplified version](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/d80b2728a3025dc4c422d959700fb79bf7516cbab524f13f8a3a36532091cdc1.png)

Simplified version

Previously some people got offended and sent me this:

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/53082c38cb94c53f4383bd3a2bf38b871537460bce2c1716f81af09d1cd121e5.png)

![https://youtu.be/nN0EelgmA48](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/d6f3ec27f3b7fb5116e9ee83ac4400b36b46f177ccf24b72e4396879884829c2.png)

https://youtu.be/nN0EelgmA48

Exactly the same slippery slope…
================================

…let’s blame the migrants
=========================

![https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqigUQmfwVc](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/f3570e9e968552dc5da7bc2127cdc5d429280da8acdb193733e6bfda47104706.png)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqigUQmfwVc

Segway

Transition

Pause

Breather

Shift

Interval

Interlude

Respite

Intermission

Interregnum

Fresh start

New chapter

Nuances from hanging out in the court
=====================================

[https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658117869316571137](https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658117869316571137)

[https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658497757672267776](https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658497757672267776)

[https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658582102844088321](https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658582102844088321)

They took my laptop, they took my phone, so I thought handwritten notes are OK.

I intentionally pixelated it only once, pretty sure future AI will be able to reverse engineer.

_(I also have un-pixelated copy on my device)_

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/4234c3ca6048b2c4c8897c8c640781d880857d3535393a32e55af644daa45a29.jpg)

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/5af9bdae7f30064b919c5993fe378f882338a7660ea9176e59c78ac66afcece3.jpg)

No. Handwritten notes are also not OK. Some of the jurors could see it and obtain the information they are not meant to have. Trust me, there were procedural nuances.

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/02f6d08575fa088e72d3afd2c615706575f88b03daba63dbabf7b69c2671a11e.png)

UK's main export product is language, culture, legal, finance… There are so many obscure rules, and procedures.

![https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/written-witness-statement](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/d06d49b7bd4933d621bf5f5f9032587d205cf03a8c8a333e4a6feb4d318a66fd.png)

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/written-witness-statement

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/487459d5c5923324cf729b11ad3b8f53e2f12349510513994b2d9d94d8fd569a.png)

![https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sworn_testimony](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/3dd2467068bea9c63f8ae7419df5d43b991b2b6ad88d2b87a1f3d194ce5aa147.png)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sworn\_testimony

*   _"true to the best of my knowledge and belief"_
    
*   _"honest belief in its truth"_
    
*   _"truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"_
    

![judgment, common sense, reasonable ](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/0456b378c419db569af30dc4ce03d91977c9929f24c201c596c1960fc29b9c7b.png)

judgment, common sense, reasonable

I could argue that each of these statements brings a different flavor of truth.

If you honestly believe it is true…

Autosuggestions. Delusions. Genuine beliefs. Genuine 🤡

There is a massive difference though:

1.  Witness box. Real-time. Interactivity. Can go deeper.
    
2.  Written statement. Frozen in time. Impossible to provide “all the truth” upfront, impossible to know which detail is important. That’s why Section 9.
    

![https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/admitting-evidence-under-sections-9-and-10-criminal-justice-act-1967](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/b687a574f7968aca49d177aba7b7784b15840168765773d3d52b3ad8942437a6.png)

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/admitting-evidence-under-sections-9-and-10-criminal-justice-act-1967

With that said, something that would be a massive game-changer - **require lawyers to fact-check** the claims of their clients. That would be pretty remarkable.

One of the top Google searches for “duty not to mislead”:

![Nuanced analysis, I actually do not fully understand the difference: https://www.rpc.co.uk/perspectives/professional-and-financial-risks/bossing-the-rules-stars-rule-1-4-you-do-not-mislead-anyone/](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/c3969a4fef742e37bc6e4b1e478fa543e28727a280f62c9fa116825b0eef910c.png)

Nuanced analysis, I actually do not fully understand the difference: https://www.rpc.co.uk/perspectives/professional-and-financial-risks/bossing-the-rules-stars-rule-1-4-you-do-not-mislead-anyone/

### Bar Standards Book Handbook

![https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/uploads/assets/de77ead9-9400-4c9d-bef91353ca9e5345/cf100042-be54-427b-a266dbfd8ec997ca/second-edition-test31072019104713.pdf](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/d12fdc13b01476dbb31f5a9bdb1f16d799e3365ee02f4a49d0d0cecde11b56f0.png)

https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/uploads/assets/de77ead9-9400-4c9d-bef91353ca9e5345/cf100042-be54-427b-a266dbfd8ec997ca/second-edition-test31072019104713.pdf

![Legal truth: https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_560041_smxx.pdf](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/d45ba5ca78355124c727f385c558793d204994e7cdf3f898970b9d300d9edb59.png)

Legal truth: https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media\_560041\_smxx.pdf

Barristers have [their tribunal](https://www.tbtas.org.uk/hearings/findings-and-sentences-of-past-hearings/), [Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal](https://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk/), [Judicial Conduct Investigations Office](https://www.complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk/)… I’m wondering if anyone ever landed there for breaking these rules.

![Who is watching the watchers? Who is regulating the regulators?](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/6a67e84a0968fe9ed8cd540e4a5634d0cd519cfdd98ab0defec114b9b77a16fa.png)

Who is watching the watchers? Who is regulating the regulators?

Welcome to legal fiction
========================

I really thought I had super strong, bulletproof, impeccable evidence.

[https://legalscreenshot.com/](https://legalscreenshot.com/)

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/a9a1a5229abd43f083dd0ad5d0a291b0e3de075f3e5fb37ca820ea43942244a9.png)

No one looked at my evidence, facts, data, or science.

**Concerns, allegations, opinions.**

That’s why going to court was one of the most traumatic experiences of my entire life.

That’s why I do what I do - hoping to receive criminal treatment - plausible culpability - not to be mistaken with [plausible deniability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability) - something that will achieve a criminal treatment - something that can initiate proceedings - obtaining pieces of paper from one case to win another:

[https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/76450/obtaining-information-that-requires-a-court-order-but-before-to-going-to-the-cou](https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/76450/obtaining-information-that-requires-a-court-order-but-before-to-going-to-the-cou)

![I'm not doing it for a number of reasons.](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/ca94ebfd0f55f0d5915338c3a715203cf98e3b2deece62c85d16eaaa1ac9e1f6.png)

I'm not doing it for a number of reasons.

Making it culturally acceptable
===============================

I still want to talk about it.

![HMRC FOI](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/6d9fd2a79b0a7c6a9a2f324979aa6ec88030330cb1fb0dad6fbc8542db2f89e9.png)

HMRC FOI

Just like talking about Hitler:

[https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/AOdGZM-rm7X44xR-hkVGk1C4MiBgQEbhqBgRRHJZOb4](https://mirror.xyz/dearmoon.eth/AOdGZM-rm7X44xR-hkVGk1C4MiBgQEbhqBgRRHJZOb4)

![From a message to a fren](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/34cd8978cc78d774bc7ac3406a96c02bf6fa4b34d56f2f315497c9a1a5598536.png)

From a message to a fren

UPDATE:
-------

Previously I was trying to understand and explain the nuance:

*   statement of witness
    
*   statement of truth
    
*   statement under oath
    

Totally forgot about the position statements:

[https://childlawadvice.org.uk/information-pages/writing-a-position-statement/](https://childlawadvice.org.uk/information-pages/writing-a-position-statement/)

Child Law Advice - [example](https://childlawadvice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Position-Statement.pdf)

[https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/get-information/family-law/position-statement/](https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/get-information/family-law/position-statement/)

Rights of Women - [example](https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Guide-to-position-statement-example.pdf)

[https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part22/pd\_part22](https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part22/pd_part22)

[https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/family/practice\_directions/pd\_part\_17a](https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/family/practice_directions/pd_part_17a)

Witness statement verified by a statement of truth - I would still prefer if everything was treated as a statement under oath.

![https://www.diffchecker.com/GeUnB9JN/](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/89873845e40021e2084f974b48e197287d7e0abf31827e017e532c07f073caad.png)

https://www.diffchecker.com/GeUnB9JN/

I picked two official versions and did some reshuffling, I think the order of the phrases matters. I truly pay attention to detail and differences in quotation marks matter to me as well.

> I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
> 
> I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

![](https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/48416bbcc59855083b9f6c09c027c16f9f0a97b6370d57417ee2ed2b79c6c7df.png)

And then the problem is - even if I understand the difference - will the court interpret it in the same way?

**UPDATE:** 19th May 2023

Shared some of my research on Twitter.

[https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658782363348770816](https://twitter.com/marsxrobertson/status/1658782363348770816)

[https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/92542/section-9-criminal-justice-act-applicable-to-family-law/92545#92545](https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/92542/section-9-criminal-justice-act-applicable-to-family-law/92545#92545)

Maybe I will accomplish a criminal trial then?

Private prosecution against myself, instantiated by some legal entity, apparently I cannot prosecute myself.

---

*Originally published on [Mars Robertson](https://paragraph.com/@dearmoon/judy-is-my-hero)*
