<100 subscribers

InfoFi aims to dismantle this system using decentralization to solve three core problems. First, it champions data ownership. The goal is for users to have full control over their data and digital identity, allowing them to claim the value they create. Second, it ensures transparency. By using the blockchain, which acts like an open and unchangeable ledger, every contribution can be clearly attributed. Every action and payment is recorded, making the system fair and auditable. Third, it creates new incentives. Creators and contributors are rewarded directly by decentralized protocols with tokens, bypassing the traditional advertising models that have long dominated the internet. In short: if Decentralized Finance (DeFi) gave people control over their money, InfoFi aims to give them control over their information.

The fact that InfoFi is even possible as a sector today is no accident; it's the result of two powerful technologies working together. It is the combination of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for measuring information and the blockchain as a secure system for recording value that makes it possible to turn abstract concepts like attention into money.

AI, especially modern large language models (LLMs), acts as the engine that transforms unstructured, hard-to-grasp information into measurable data. This process could be described as a form of "information refinement," and it is essential for any InfoFi platform. AI has several roles: it processes and analyzes huge amounts of real-time data from countless sources like Twitter (X), Discord, GitHub, and news outlets. It performs complex sentiment analysis to gauge market mood and identify new trends, creating a technical basis for valuing and pricing information. However, one of AI's most crucial tasks is to separate the important from the unimportant—the "signal" from the "noise." It checks content for quality, such as originality, depth, and relevance, allowing platforms to reward genuine contributions instead of useless spam.

While AI handles the analysis, blockchain technology provides the economic foundation and ownership structure. It supports the InfoFi model in several ways. First, it enables the creation of tokens, which are digital markers of value that can represent attention, a good reputation, or high-quality content. Second, smart contracts ensure that these rewards are distributed transparently, automatically, and without intermediaries. This guarantees that compensation reaches contributors directly and verifiably, based on set rules. Finally, the blockchain serves as an unchangeable record of ownership. It provides clear attribution for data and creative work, solving the ownership problem of Web2. This interplay of AI for analysis and blockchain for ownership and transactions creates the "purification, pricing, and circulation" loop that defines the InfoFi ecosystem.

InfoFi also represents a major step forward for incentive systems in the Web3 world, moving away from the often ineffective methods of the past. Between 2018 and 2022, "Behavioral Finance" airdrops were very popular. Users were rewarded for performing simple on-chain actions, like swaps or transfers. The idea was to kickstart usage and build a user base. However, this system failed for several reasons. It was highly vulnerable to Sybil attacks, where individuals used scripts to control thousands of wallets to grab a large share of the rewards without being genuine users. Additionally, many recipients immediately sold their tokens for a quick profit, causing user activity to plummet after the airdrop. The main issue was that simple interactions were no longer a scarce resource and said nothing about a user's genuine interest in a project.

This failure led to a shift in thinking about how value is created and rewarded in Web3, moving from "Behavioral Finance" to "Information Finance." The new logic is that in a world where community opinion and a strong narrative are often more important than a finished product, information itself is the most valuable commodity. The focus shifted from what you did (e.g., a swap) to what you said, who saw it, and how it spread. This new perspective recognizes that every tweet, meme, and opinion helps shape the market's memory and consensus.

This gave rise to a smarter incentive mechanism: the "precision airdrop." Instead of rewarding simple, easily gamed actions, InfoFi platforms use dynamic algorithms and multiple tiers to specifically reward those who provide valuable information. These systems analyze a user's off-chain social identity, influence, and content quality and link this information to their on-chain address. This allows for a much more targeted distribution of rewards, filtering out low-effort participants and ensuring that incentives go to those who bring real, measurable value to the ecosystem. This model demonstrates a more mature understanding of value creation in the digital age, recognizing that in the attention economy, influence is the scarcest resource.

The consequences of this shift extend far beyond the crypto world. By creating a direct economic link between information creators and the protocols that benefit from them, InfoFi challenges the multi-trillion-dollar digital advertising industry. The traditional model relies on platforms acting as intermediaries, bundling user attention and selling it to advertisers. InfoFi eliminates this middleman. Platforms like bam.fun already allow creators to work directly with brands, with payment based on verifiable metrics like views and interaction quality, all tracked on the blockchain. A successful and widely adopted InfoFi sector could redirect a significant portion of the money currently flowing to advertising giants like Google and Meta into decentralized, token-based incentive systems, fundamentally changing the economic structure of the internet.

Although the InfoFi sector is still in its early days, a diverse and competitive landscape is already forming. Various platforms are emerging with different strategies, target audiences, and technologies, all competing for a leading role in the new attention economy. The market can be roughly divided into two areas: on one hand, there are professional information platforms focused on providing high-precision data and analytics as a service. On the other hand, there are community-oriented growth platforms that use gamification and mass appeal to build viral ecosystems. This part compares the key players shaping this field.

Kaito has established itself as a pioneer of the InfoFi concept and is considered the flagship of the industry. The platform is often described as the "Bloomberg Terminal of Web3" and follows a two-pronged strategy: it aims to serve both the demanding institutional market and the growing world of content creators. This dual focus creates a powerful, self-reinforcing system: high-quality data from creators improves Kaito's AI models, which in turn attracts more institutional clients.

The platform's products reflect this strategy:

• Kaito Analytics (or Kaito Pro): This is an AI-powered search and analytics platform for professional users such as hedge funds, quantitative traders, and AI firms. It collects and structures real-time data from over 10,000 sources—including Twitter, Discord, governance forums, and academic papers—to provide valuable insights and sentiment analysis. This product is offered as a premium subscription, reportedly costing $833 per month, indicating a clear business-to-business (B2B) model.

• Kaito Yaps & Kaito Connect: This is the part of the ecosystem aimed at creators. It functions as a decentralized marketing and distribution network where crypto projects can sponsor campaigns to encourage the creation of organic, community-driven content. Using its own AI scoring system, the platform rewards high-quality contributions with "Yaps" points, which can be exchanged for the platform's native $KAITO token. Well-known projects like dYdX and EigenLayer have already used this service, providing substantial monthly rewards to activate their communities.

Financially and in terms of market position, Kaito has demonstrated a solid business model. In the second quarter of 2025, the platform reportedly generated an annualized revenue of $33 million and conducted token buybacks worth $3.9 million, indicating healthy business performance. The project has received $10.8 million from leading venture capital firms like Dragonfly Capital and Sequoia Capital, lending it significant credibility. The $KAITO token, which runs on the Base blockchain, has several functions: it is used for governance, staking with a reported annual percentage yield (APY) of about 11%, and as a means of payment within the ecosystem.

In contrast to Kaito's focus on institutional clients, WAGMI Hub is designed for mass adoption and viral spread. The project operates at the intersection of InfoFi, AI, and meme culture, aiming to build a large, community-driven Web3 ecosystem that is both entertaining and easily accessible. WAGMI Hub claims to have over 10 million users across its various products, suggesting a strategy based on network effects and gamified user acquisition.

The WAGMI Hub ecosystem consists of several interconnected products:

• WAGMI HUB: A gamified platform that turns community participation into measurable progress through interactive quests, meme battles, and a comprehensive scoring system for wallets and social accounts. These scores are directly linked to airdrop rewards, creating a clear incentive to participate.

• WAGMI AI: A crypto-native AI research assistant and trading engine that claims a predictive accuracy of about 78%. It offers tools like smart wallet dashboards, copy trading, and trend detection, and has already attracted over 10,000 paying subscribers.

• WAGMI MEDIA and WAGMI MARKET: These two components complete the ecosystem. A media arm hosts AMAs (Ask Me Anything) and virtual events to foster culture, while a Telegram-integrated marketplace allows for the trading of digital goods like stickers and game items.

The engine of this entire ecosystem is the $INFOFI token. It is intended to be the "universal attention token" of Web3, facilitating every interaction on the platform, including payments, tips, subscriptions, staking for premium features, and access to major campaigns. The project's strategy relies heavily on partnerships with big names like Floki, NEAR, Render Network, and Notcoin. These partners launch campaigns on the platform and contribute to large reward pools, which drives demand for the $INFOFI token. The token is available on both the Solana and BNB Smart Chain networks, providing access to fast and low-cost ecosystems where meme culture and rapid trend changes are common.

In a strategic middle ground are platforms like Cookie.fun and Galxe Starboard. They are evolving from established Web3 niches to embrace the InfoFi model.

Cookie.fun, powered by the Cookie DAO, is an AI-driven data platform with a strong focus on community-first rewards and sophisticated anti-fraud mechanisms (anti-farming). Its flagship feature, Cookie Snaps, is a system that rewards users based on sentiment-driven engagement and loyalty rather than sheer activity. This allows projects to tailor their rewards based on finer metrics of engagement quality and on-chain behavior, leading to a more sustainable incentive system. By prioritizing user rewards over its own platform fees and offering most of its analytics tools for free, Cookie.fun positions itself as a more open and democratic alternative to competitors like Kaito.

Galxe Starboard represents the strategic evolution of Galxe, one of the most well-known platforms for quests and community building in Web3, into the InfoFi space. Starboard is more than just a task platform; it is a sophisticated growth and analytics solution for Web3 teams. Its key innovation is the focus on impact-based rewards. The platform combines on-chain metrics (like Total Value Locked (TVL) and protocol usage) with off-chain influence (like content quality and social reach) to identify and reward contributors who have a real, measurable impact. The "Aura" score was developed to quantify this off-chain reputation. At its launch, Starboard had already attracted over 20 projects, including large ecosystems like Sui and 0G Labs, which together provided over $5 million in campaign rewards to kickstart the platform.

The strategic differences among these key players highlight the multifaceted nature of the InfoFi sector. While all are built on the concept of monetizing information, their target markets, product philosophies, and token utilities differ significantly. The following table summarizes the key features for a direct comparison.

Table 2.1: Comparative Analysis of Leading InfoFi Platforms

A closer look at this landscape reveals a critical, systemic vulnerability. The success of the entire InfoFi model, especially for platforms like Kaito, Cookie.fun, and Galxe Starboard, is highly dependent on continued access to the public APIs of centralized social media platforms, most notably Twitter/X. This dependency creates a significant, centralized point of failure for a sector that champions decentralization. Access to these APIs is controlled by a single corporate entity and is subject to unpredictable changes in policy, pricing, or availability. This risk is not just theoretical; X Corp. has made drastic changes to its API access terms in the past, and even Kaito's own documentation acknowledges this as a potential threat. This suggests that the long-term viability of these platforms may depend on their ability to either diversify their data sources to include decentralized social networks like Farcaster or undertake the much more difficult task of building their own native social platforms to fully control their data supply chain.

While the InfoFi space has been primarily shaped by crypto-native startups, a new and noteworthy player, AddPlus Data (ADD+), is now attempting to bridge the gap between traditional data analytics and the emerging Web3 economy. The launch of its InfoFI platform represents a significant strategic move by an established company into this nascent field. This section provides a comprehensive analysis of ADD+, its InfoFI platform, its strategic positioning, and the unique opportunities and challenges it faces as a traditional web company entering the crypto-native world.

AddPlus Data (ADD+) is a Singapore-based data analytics company with a reported valuation of $5 million. Before entering the Web3 space, the company's core business was providing market insights and analytics services to a clientele that includes Fortune 500 companies. In public communications, Andy Pasternack is named as a key contact person for the company, and its official website is addplus.org.

The company's leadership has framed its expansion into the InfoFi space not as a trend-chasing maneuver, but as an ethical imperative. According to company statements, the move was motivated by the recognition of the "silent flaw at the heart of Web2"—the fundamentally extractive nature of the data economy. Executives state that upon exploring blockchain technology, they realized it offered the potential to build systems not just with superior tools, but with "better ethics," leading to the development of their InfoFI platform.

The stated mission of the ADD+ InfoFI platform is to architect a "fairer, more transparent data economy where users are not just the source of value, but also the beneficiaries." To achieve this, the platform is designed as a closed-loop data economy built upon a blockchain infrastructure. The mechanics of this system are designed to create a symbiotic relationship between users and the companies that utilize their data.

The process operates through a distinct, four-stage cycle:

1. User Opt-In and Data Contribution: The process begins with users making a conscious and willing decision to share their behavioral and on-chain data with the platform. This consent-based approach is a cornerstone of the platform's ethical positioning.

2. Verification, Valuation, and Compensation: Once data is contributed, the InfoFI platform's systems verify its authenticity and assign it a value. Following this valuation, users receive instant and transparent compensation, which is distributed automatically via smart contracts.

3. Analytics Engine and Insight Generation: The aggregated, ethically sourced data then becomes the fuel for a suite of advanced analytics tools. These tools are designed for use by Web3 companies seeking to understand market trends, user behavior, and community sentiment.

4. Product Improvement and Loop Closure: Finally, the insights generated from the analytics engine are used by these Web3 companies to build better, more relevant products and services. In many cases, these improved products are intended for the very same users who contributed the initial data, thus "closing the loop" and creating a system where users are direct beneficiaries of their own data contributions.

ADD+ has explicitly positioned its InfoFI platform as an ethical alternative to what it perceives as the "extractive patterns" common to both traditional Web2 platforms and even some existing Web3 analytics tools. The company's messaging consistently emphasizes the principles of consent, transparency, and shared value. It is not aiming to directly replace established crypto analytics platforms like Dune Analytics but rather to offer a "better path forward" built on a philosophy where data value is shared equitably, not hoarded.

ADD+ has clearly articulated that its move into Web3 is an "evolution" of its business model, not a complete "pivot" away from its established operations. The company plans to continue its traditional data analytics services for its existing clients while positioning the InfoFI platform as a major new engine for growth.

To guide this evolution, the company has outlined a multi-phased rollout with ambitious and specific growth targets. This roadmap provides a clear framework for assessing the project's progress and the credibility of its long-term vision.

Table 3.1: ADD+ InfoFI Platform Roadmap and Key Milestones

This strategic entry into Web3 is a critical test case for the convergence of the traditional technology sector and the decentralized economy. The success or failure of ADD+ InfoFI will serve as a powerful indicator of whether established "TradWeb" companies can leverage their existing strengths to compete effectively in this new domain, or if the space will remain the purview of crypto-native builders. If ADD+ succeeds, it could provide a viable playbook for other legacy data and technology firms looking to enter the Web3 market. Conversely, a failure might suggest that the cultural, operational, and philosophical gaps between the two worlds are too significant to bridge, thereby reinforcing the competitive moat of native Web3 projects.

ADD+'s primary competitive advantage lies in its origins. As an established, traditional analytics firm, it can leverage its corporate history and professional reputation to build trust in a market that is often perceived by outsiders as volatile and opaque. The company's strong emphasis on an "ethical data" narrative is a deliberate strategy to differentiate itself from anonymous or purely financially-driven crypto projects, appealing to both users and potential enterprise clients who may be wary of the "Wild West" reputation of the space.

However, this unique positioning also comes with significant execution risks:

• Culture Clash and Lack of Crypto-Native DNA: The Web3 market operates at a breakneck pace and is driven by a unique culture of memes, community governance, and often-chaotic innovation. A traditional corporate entity like ADD+ may struggle to navigate this environment. Crypto-native competitors possess a deep, intuitive understanding of tokenomics, community building, and viral marketing that is difficult to replicate. There is a substantial risk that ADD+ could build a product that is technically sound but culturally misaligned, failing to gain traction with the target user base.

• User Acquisition Challenge: The entire "closed-loop" model of the InfoFI platform is predicated on the ability to onboard a critical mass of users willing to share their data. The stated goal of acquiring over 500,000 users is a formidable challenge, especially when competing against crypto-native platforms that have already established large, dedicated communities through years of engagement and airdrop campaigns.

• Regulatory and Legal Scrutiny: The ADD+ business model, which involves the direct financial compensation of users for their data, is likely to attract significant regulatory attention. This model directly intersects with complex legal frameworks governing data privacy, such as Europe's GDPR and California's CCPA, which impose strict rules on data consent, monetization, and cross-border transfers. Furthermore, the mechanism of providing "instant compensation" through smart contracts could be scrutinized by financial regulators like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Depending on its structure, this reward system could potentially be interpreted as an investment contract under the Howey Test, which would classify the platform's rewards as securities and subject the company to a host of stringent regulations. As a Singapore-based company aiming for a global user base, ADD+ will have to navigate a complex and fragmented international legal landscape. Its ability to manage these legal and compliance challenges will be as critical to its success as its technological execution.

Having examined the key players, it is crucial to zoom out and assess the InfoFi market as a holistic ecosystem. This section will analyze the sector's investment potential from both retail and institutional perspectives, delve into the inherent structural risks that challenge its long-term viability, and explore the future trajectory of InfoFi as it matures from a niche concept into a potentially foundational layer of the digital economy.

The InfoFi sector, while still in its early stages, has already achieved a notable market presence. As of recent data, the collective market capitalization of the top InfoFi projects stands at approximately $441 million. This figure represents the market's initial valuation of the potential to monetize attention and information, a market that is orders of magnitude larger in the traditional economy.

For retail investors, InfoFi presents a unique value proposition. It offers the opportunity to "leverage small funds for big opportunities," as participation often relies on "sweat equity"—the creation of valuable content and the cultivation of an online reputation—rather than significant capital investment. This democratizes access to potential returns. Furthermore, by making previously implicit information differences explicit, these platforms act as powerful alpha discovery tools, helping retail participants reduce information asymmetry and better judge market sentiment.

For institutional investors, the sector provides a compelling way to gain exposure to the high-growth intersection of AI and cryptocurrency. Unlike purely speculative meme coins, many InfoFi projects offer more fundamentally grounded investment theses. Platforms like Kaito, for instance, have established a clear Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)-like revenue model, generating $33 million in annualized revenue from subscriptions and B2B services. With a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio in the range of 15-18x, it can be argued that such a project is potentially undervalued when compared to traditional SaaS companies, which often trade at multiples of 20x or higher. The primary challenge in valuing these projects lies in determining the appropriate multiples for a crypto-native company operating in a novel subsector. A comprehensive investment thesis must differentiate between InfoFi "infrastructure" projects like Kaito, which have predictable revenue streams, and InfoFi "applications" like WAGMI Hub, whose value is more closely tied to network effects and user growth.

Despite its promise, the InfoFi sector is built upon a central paradox that represents its greatest structural risk: the Quality vs. Quantity Paradox. The very financial incentives designed to elicit high-quality, insightful information ("signal") simultaneously create a powerful motivation for users to mass-produce low-value, algorithmically-optimized content ("noise") in an attempt to game the reward systems. As Kaito's own experience has shown, the launch of tokenized rewards can lead to a deluge of content, making it difficult to maintain the quality of information on social platforms.

This dynamic is poised to create a perpetual, adversarial AI arms race. On one side are the platforms, which must continuously refine their sophisticated AI models to detect novelty, genuine insight, and authentic influence. On the other side are users who may leverage generative AI tools to mass-produce content that is engineered to appear high-quality and optimized to fool the platform's scoring algorithms. The long-term viability of the entire sector may depend on its ability to solve this problem.

The most durable competitive moat in this environment may not be a superior AI model alone, but rather a robust incentive system that heavily weights long-term, verifiable reputation. By making reputation a core component of the reward calculation—as seen with Galxe's "Aura" score or Cookie.fun's loyalty metrics—platforms can make it prohibitively expensive and time-consuming for spammers to build the necessary social capital to earn significant rewards. In this model, reputation becomes the ultimate defense against the inevitable flood of noise.

This dynamic also creates a new form of market reflexivity. The act of analyzing and reporting on a token's "mindshare" or "sentiment" on an InfoFi platform directly influences that very metric. This establishes a powerful feedback loop. For example, traders observing a project's mindshare rising on a dashboard are incentivized to buy its token, which in turn drives up its price and attracts more attention. Creators, seeing this trend, are then incentivized to produce more content about the project to earn rewards, further boosting its mindshare score. This loop could lead to heightened market volatility and creates the potential for novel forms of market manipulation, where sophisticated actors could attempt to artificially inflate a project's attention metrics to trigger a cascade of buying activity.

Looking beyond the immediate challenges, the long-term vision for InfoFi is to mature from a system of content rewards into a full-fledged financial layer of the internet. This evolution could manifest in several transformative ways:

• Attention Derivatives: As the metrics for quantifying attention and influence become more standardized and trusted, they could form the basis for a new class of financial derivatives. This would allow traders to speculate on, hedge against, or gain exposure to the future attention of specific topics, projects, or even individual creators, effectively creating a market to long or short influence itself.

• Decentralized Credit and Reputation Systems: The reputation scores generated by InfoFi platforms could evolve into a form of decentralized, portable credit. A user's proven track record of providing valuable insights could influence their voting power in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), lower their collateral requirements on DeFi lending platforms, or even be used as a factor in real-world financial assessments.

• Enhanced Prediction Markets: The integration of real-time sentiment and attention data from InfoFi platforms into decentralized prediction markets like Polymarket could create exceptionally powerful tools for collective forecasting. By combining the wisdom of the crowd with data-driven sentiment analysis, these markets could provide more accurate predictions on a wide range of future events.

The ultimate endgame, as articulated by pioneers like Kaito, is for InfoFi to become the "interoperable information finance layer of the internet." This vision sees InfoFi as a foundational protocol that seamlessly connects creators, users, and brands, establishing a new economic model for the digital age that is more efficient, transparent, and equitable. This trajectory, however, raises profound societal questions. The maturation of InfoFi could lead to the "financialization of truth," where the perceived validity of any piece of information—from news events to political statements—is determined by market forces and financial speculation. While this could create powerful incentives for uncovering truth, it also opens the door to scenarios where well-capitalized actors could attempt to manipulate the "market for truth" for their own ends, posing deep ethical challenges about whether truth itself should be a financially tradable commodity.

The emergence of the Information Finance sector represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of the digital economy. It is a technologically sophisticated and philosophically ambitious attempt to correct the economic imbalances of the Web2 era and the flawed incentive structures of early Web3. By leveraging the analytical power of AI and the transactional integrity of blockchain, InfoFi platforms are creating novel markets for intangible assets like attention, influence, and reputation. This report has analyzed the foundational principles of this new sector, dissected the competitive landscape, provided a deep dive into the strategic entry of a traditional firm, ADD+, and assessed the market's future potential and inherent risks.

InfoFi is best understood as a direct response to the failures of existing models. It seeks to replace the extractive data economy of Web2 and the easily-gamed "behavioral finance" airdrops of early Web3 with a more robust system that rewards the creation of verifiably valuable information. The competitive landscape is currently bifurcated, with institutional-grade "information engines" like Kaito focusing on high-fidelity analytics and B2B services, while gamified "growth platforms" like WAGMI Hub target mass-market adoption through viral mechanics.

The entry of AddPlus Data (ADD+) with its InfoFI platform is a significant development, serving as a critical test case for the convergence of traditional and decentralized economies. Its unique "ethical data" positioning offers a compelling differentiator, but the firm faces substantial execution risks related to navigating crypto-native culture and overcoming immense user acquisition challenges.

Across the entire sector, the central, unresolved challenge remains the "Quality vs. Quantity Paradox." The financial incentives that drive the system are a double-edged sword, simultaneously encouraging both high-quality signal and a flood of sophisticated noise. The long-term viability of any InfoFi platform will hinge on its ability to solve this adversarial problem through a combination of advanced AI and, more importantly, a robust, game-theory-proof reputation system.

Based on this comprehensive analysis, the following strategic recommendations are offered for key participants in the Web3 ecosystem.

For Venture Capitalists and Investors:

• Develop a Bifurcated Investment Thesis: It is crucial to distinguish between investing in InfoFi "infrastructure" (e.g., Kaito) and InfoFi "applications" (e.g., WAGMI Hub). Infrastructure plays often have more predictable, SaaS-like revenue models and should be evaluated on metrics like customer acquisition cost and lifetime value. Application plays are more dependent on network effects and should be assessed on user growth, engagement, and the virality of their token-based economy.

• Prioritize Incentive Design in Due Diligence: The most defensible long-term moat in this sector will not be a slightly better AI model, but a superior incentive and reputation system that is resistant to gaming. Investors should conduct deep due diligence on a platform's mechanisms for mitigating the "Quality vs. Quantity Paradox."

• Scrutinize Regulatory Strategy: For projects like ADD+ that operate at the intersection of data monetization and financial rewards, the regulatory and legal strategy is as important as the technological roadmap. A thorough assessment of their approach to data privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA) and potential securities classification is paramount.

For Founders and Builders:

• Address the Centralization Risk of APIs: The dependency on centralized social media APIs is a critical vulnerability for the entire sector. Founders building in this space should proactively explore strategies to mitigate this risk, such as integrating with decentralized social protocols (e.g., Farcaster, Lens) or diversifying data sources.

• Evaluate Anti-Sybil Mechanisms of Partners: When considering partnering with an InfoFi platform for a growth or marketing campaign, a project's primary concern should be the effectiveness of the platform's anti-Sybil and anti-spam filters. A careful evaluation is necessary to ensure that marketing budgets are allocated toward generating genuine engagement, not rewarding automated bots.

For All Participants:

• Monitor for Second-Order Financialization: The development of "attention derivatives" and other second-order financial products will be a key indicator of the sector's maturation. The emergence of these instruments will signal that the underlying metrics of attention and influence are becoming trusted and standardized enough to build more complex financial structures upon.

• Track the AI Arms Race: The ongoing dynamic between AI-powered scoring systems and user-side AI-powered content generation will serve as a crucial proxy for the health and sustainability of the InfoFi economy. The ability of platforms to consistently stay ahead in this adversarial game will determine their long-term success.

Support dialog