# Editorial quality review

By [sol8848](https://paragraph.com/@sol8848) · 2021-10-28

---

As well as systems to catch and control substandard and vandalistic edits, Wikipedia also has a full [style and content manual](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style) and various positive systems for continual article review and improvement. Examples of the processes include [peer review](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review), [good article assessment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles), and [the featured article process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles), a rigorous review of articles that are intended to meet the highest standards and showcase Wikipedia's capability to produce high-quality work.

Besides, specific types of articles or fields often have their own specialized and comprehensive [projects](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject), assessment processes (such as [biographical article assessment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment)), and expert reviewers within specific subjects. Nominated articles are also frequently the subject of specific focus on the [neutral point of view noticeboard](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard) or in [WikiProject Cleanup](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cleanup).

---

*Originally published on [sol8848](https://paragraph.com/@sol8848/editorial-quality-review)*