# Fam: Curation vs Composability

> a letter to Nick

**Published by:** [sweetman](https://paragraph.com/@sweetman/)
**Published on:** 2024-07-03
**Categories:** fam, party, zora, sound, base
**URL:** https://paragraph.com/@sweetman/fam-curation-vs-composability

## Content

Dear Nick, I recommend we do not limit the following pages to exclusively Fam parties:ExploreProfileAllowing existing parties to be imported into the Fam toolsets is a feature, not a bug. Composability allows us to build music legos. Bring-your-own-party (byop) expands by:new customers - with an existing need to use their party with Fam tools (Zora create/collect)simplicity/smolbrain - it takes more time to filter to only Fam parties. Inclusive is the lowest lift. faster onboarding - skip the create flow. visit your profile, find your Fam, already there.I understand the desire to limit those pages to exclusively Fam drops. Those other parties aren't a part of Fam. It might be too much info & confusing UX. Filtering our UI to exclusively Parties created in the Fam UI could create a cleaner experience. I very much appreciate working with Fam professionally. Fam has opened my eyes to Party protocol & the value of multiplayer music onchain. Whichever path we choose, I'm excited to show everyone what we've been building. We have contributed open source tools for any party to collect music on Zora & Sound. Thank you for supporting my practice. - Sweetman.eth

## Publication Information

- [sweetman](https://paragraph.com/@sweetman/): Publication homepage
- [All Posts](https://paragraph.com/@sweetman/): More posts from this publication
- [RSS Feed](https://api.paragraph.com/blogs/rss/@sweetman): Subscribe to updates

## Optional

- [Collect as NFT](https://paragraph.com/@sweetman/fam-curation-vs-composability): Support the author by collecting this post
- [View Collectors](https://paragraph.com/@sweetman/fam-curation-vs-composability/collectors): See who has collected this post