# Conspiracymaxxing (Follow-up) By [Xegis](https://paragraph.com/@xegis) · 2026-03-15 conspiracymaxxing --- The standard definition of conspiracy theory is the **“belief that some influential or controlling organisation or group is secretly responsible for a notable event or phenomenon,”** and from this definition the term has been used by a wide range of institutions through mainstream media, organised religion, government, and academia to discredit any such belief. Thus, the accusation of **“thats a conspiracy theory,”** does't speak to whether or not any such theory might be true, but rather, suggests that by nature of a theory being a conspiracy it must be instantly invalidated and discredited; certainly something that isn’t to be legitimately considered or discussed anywhere “proper!” Such gatekeeping is sure to work wonders for any hidden controllers exerting power and influence over the ignorant masses. But of course, there are non of those, right? - thats a “conspiracy theory!” - to which the only truly unbiased, unmediated, and legitimate response might be, “yes the theory falls into the taxonomy of conspiracy, but is it true?” Which would then demand further investigation, and who wants to go down that rabbit hole? Surely not the institutions by which any such controllers maintain hidden power and influence, as this is not in their interests. Ontologically and epistemologically speaking, there’s something quite fascinating about the dichotomy between a belief that **"the world is exactly as it is being presented to us"** vs. the notion that **"the world is nothing like it is being presented, but we’re all supposed act as if it is."** The former seems to suggest that our current institutions don’t hinder exploration and advancement in science, research, archaeology, political theory, theology, or philosophy, and by extension our understanding of the true nature of history, humanity, the world, this universe, God, and so forth, but actually reinforce such exploration in a positive or progressive way. How can engagement within our current paradigm and its institutions be a legitimate way to understand reality or move forward as a species? If we take Donald Hoffman’s theses that reality is nothing like what we have evolved to perceive, and apply it elsewhere, then the academic world would start freaking out because its not designed for decompartmentalisation, its literally built to keep academics in their rigid little research silos and sectioned off from higher consciousness. If humanity started breaking down the barriers between disciplines, and began fitting more pieces of the - or at least part of our current - puzzle together, then we might start waking up en-mass and realise that this world is a little - or a lot - different from the way that it is being presented (and built, organised, and constructed) for us. But thats a conspiracy theory!  When I was involved and participating in institutional, academic, and art world contexts in the pre-COVID era, I began to realise that people consciously or unconsciously operate within a framework that benefits the world and its institutions, which means that certain things must be discarded, suppressed, denied, or remain unexplored, if one is to function, participate, and progress in society. Everyone is doing this to some extent, and it’s certainly not conductive to the cultivation of capital K-Gnostic Knowledge. How can you carry on acting as if the world and its institutions are not poisoned, compromised, parasitised, and corrupt, when deep down you have always known that they are? But fringe conspiracy theorists and influencers on social media fall short as well. Ritual participation often involves repetition of certain ideas about the world and who controls it, rather than legitimate investigation. Even legitimate investigation over years can blind one to the bigger picture; hence why we have people who think it’s all _this group_, or _that group_. You have for example an abundance of those who are repeating “there are no aliens, it’s all demons,” or "it’s all Khazarian-linked bloodlines,” and this is where conspiracy theories fall short. David Icke for example has uncovered a vast amount of research about who controls the world, but he’s largely ignored the modern UFO/ET intervention (including the biological and technological nuts and bolts aspect of its reality,) and as a result he and his followers are missing a huge part of what is actually going on in our world today, as we are now emerging into the greater galactic community. Nobody has the full picture, but individuals and groups have begun to put pieces of the puzzle together. Curt Jaimungal of _Theories of Everything_ has often claimed that the real breakthrough will come from the fringes; from outside of the institutions. **Conspiracymaxxing** says that in 2026, if we want to move forward in our understanding of a greater reality and into a higher state of consciousness, towards real human sovereignty and self determination, then we must start taking conspiracy theories seriously. How can YOU continue to ignore the Epstein files, the UFO Disclosure process, and the new data coming forward that challenges mainstream narratives and by extension our entire understanding of archaeology, human history, and human origins? For the institutions its easy, because they are literally designed to reinforce a consensus false reality of illusion and control (through the Saturn-Moon matrix, if you follow that logic,) but this is not what WE as humanity are designed for. We're destined for something much greater, and this knowledge is being suppressed and kept form us; it’s what the matrix control system doesn't want humanity to realise. Whether we think of this fallen reality as a grand conspiracy (linked to the Archons,) or a network of power, control, and interlacing influence linked to satanic elites, non-human ETs, and interdimensional forces, the reality of conspiracy can no longer be ignored; the question now is; _can enough of us begin to wake up to it and take back control?_ Further exploration will consider the extent of Greater Community (i.e. non-human extraterestrial) influence on humanity, both ancient and modern; a reality that we are only now beginning to realise that we are part of. Xegis. --- *Originally published on [Xegis](https://paragraph.com/@xegis/conspiracymaxxing-follow-up)*