
Airdrops have become one of the most powerful tools in crypto – for growth, distribution, and community alignment.
However, time and time again, we see airdrops are also one of the most wasteful tools.
Across ecosystems, we see the same pattern:
Bots farm
Sybil clusters dominate
Mercenary wallets dump the token instantly
Real contributors get diluted or ignored
So we asked a simple, fundamental question:
More specifically, could it have predicted the outcomes of the EIGEN Season 2 airdrop?
To answer that, we analyzed 8,226 wallets, tracking their behavior across 90 days after the drop.
The results are not just clear, they are transformational for the future of airdrops.
Most airdrops treat all wallets as equal.
But wallets are not equal — their behavior is not equal.
In any large distribution set, you will always find:
High-value participants
Occasional users
Short-term opportunists
Sybil clusters
Complete throwaway accounts
While we occasionally see thoughtful airdrop distribution patterns, today, almost all of them get paid the same.
The result is predictable: most of your airdrop budget reaches the wrong users.

We scored 8,226 Eigen airdrop claimants using zScore, Zeru’s onchain behavior model (0–1000). Then we tracked:
Holding vs. dumping
Liquidity participation
Wallet maturity
Onchain contribution
Time-held after claim
Evidence of opportunistic farming
And then we correlated all of it with Zeru’s reputation score AI model, zScore.

The dataset revealed a consistent pattern:
75–85% immediate dump rate
Extremely low retention
High Sybil likelihood
Infrequent or extractive onchain activity
Almost zero liquidity contribution
Mixed behavior
Partial dumping
Some re-engagement
50–100% retention
Higher governance participation
2–3× more LP engagement
Fewer signs of opportunistic farming
Significantly longer holding periods
Reputation didn't just correlate with “holding.” It correlated with quality of participation.

We modeled what would have happened if the distribution weighted by zScore.
~68% of tokens dumped
Only ~32% retained after 90 days
Dumping drops to 18%
Retention increases to 68%
~87% fewer bots/Sybils
2.5× more tokens reaching meaningful contributors
Millions saved in wasted emissions
This is not speculative. This came directly from onchain data across thousands of addresses. You can view more data and insights here.

Crypto has matured beyond the “spray-and-pray” airdrop era.
Budgets are tightening. Protocols are competing for real users. AI agents are about to flood the chain. Restaking and AVSs require trustworthy capital.
Reputation creates the missing filter between:
Users who show up only for the payout, and
Users who actually grow the ecosystem.
In a world moving toward agentic systems, verifiable reputation will become the foundation layer for:
Airdrops
Incentives
Governance
Access
Liquidity programs
Credit
Sybil resistance
This research is proof that scoring wallet behavior is not only possible — it drives massive efficiency gains.
If you're planning an airdrop, incentives program, or early-user campaign, reputation is no longer optional.
A reputation-weighted framework lets you:
Reward real contributors
Cut off wasteful wallets
Boost user retention
Improve token distribution quality
Reduce dilution of genuine supporters
Maintain healthier market dynamics
Simply put: You get more value for the same budget.
This is why we built zPass, a universal reputation passport that allows users to prove their behavior and unlock onchain opportunities without exposing PII.
And this is why zScore exists as an autonomous verifiable system running on EigenCloud: so that reputation becomes transparent, fair, auditable, and decentralized.
Airdrops will change.
Incentives will change.
User identity will change.
This research shows exactly what direction the industry is already moving toward.
You can check your own wallet’s reputation — and mint your zPass soon — here:
Your onchain actions already tell a story. Now, you can finally own it.
If you’re a founder or builder and want to embed zPass into your protocol, let’s talk.
Zeru and Derek @ Zeru
No comments yet