# Challenge Numbero UNO By [zimagetsfox](https://paragraph.com/@zimagetsfox) ยท 2024-06-19 --- Lack of systematics, Unpredictable consequences and false conclusions. Why guess? It's time to find out if I can trade in the plus? The thought has been brewing for a long time and now I think I understand how exactly to approach this issue. Online poker has been systematized, divided into "Buips", there were clear enough criteria of "success" and "luck", it was approximately clear where and how "money leaks" and what you need to work on to correct errors. I think the problem of crypto is that it "forgives everything", I will not tell you what I mean, it will take a long time. Let's get closer to the body. I want to create a blog with trading ideas, each of which will be supported by a deal with a clearly formulated reason for the trade and the points of closing the position, I want to formalize the trade, to pull down the corset of shackles and rules. The challenge is this: To beat the three most correct in my understanding currently HOLD portfolios, we will compete with 3 portfolios: 33% BTC / 33% wstETH / 34% Stable average defi apy 50% BTC / 50% wstETH 100% BTC Numbers (Rules) - VERY STRICT RULES For an easy account we will start with a Bankroll of 100k. The size of one position is from 2% to 10% of the BR. Each trade has a justification, a column of text that shilite this trade trying to pull the owl of causality on the globe of logic. To give each trade a subjective assessment of "confidence" on a ten-point scale, which should affect the size of the position and take profit/stop loss orders. The trade should have pending take profit/stop loss orders, usually in installments. There will be situations when the trade will be closed for other reasons, not reaching the orders described in the fifth point, this should have a well-described reason. Let's start and then we will act according to the circumstances. --- *Originally published on [zimagetsfox](https://paragraph.com/@zimagetsfox/challenge-numbero-uno)*