<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>turnert05</title>
        <link>https://paragraph.com/@113356</link>
        <description>undefined</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 01:57:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        
        <copyright>All rights reserved</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[rgh r]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@113356/rgh-r</link>
            <guid>alnMqAwsjeXdQsKp56mQ</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[dsrg h tfh hr rhyh]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsrg h tfh hr rhyh</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>113356@newsletter.paragraph.com (turnert05)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[7 Bitcoin Leaders Speak Up On The Bitcoin Block Size Limit Debate
]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@113356/7-bitcoin-leaders-speak-up-on-the-bitcoin-block-size-limit-debate</link>
            <guid>56d8TpuPH3icB4owCUSG</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 03:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Over the past year or two, the block size debate has become one of bitcoin’s most important political issues. Although some still view this as nothing more than a technological upgrade, the reality is the root cause of contention in the matter has quite a bit to do with politics. After all, someone who does not much care for decentralization could theoretically contend that scalability is not an issue at all. If they do not see a problem with a few nodes processing all bitcoin transactions, t...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past year or two, the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block">block size</a> debate has become one of <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin">bitcoin</a>’s most important political issues. Although some still view this as nothing more than a technological upgrade, the reality is the root cause of contention in the matter has quite a bit to do with politics. After all, someone who does not much care for decentralization could theoretically contend that scalability is not an issue at all. If they do not see a problem with a few nodes processing all bitcoin transactions, then why would they care about whether or not a kid in the Philippines has the ability to run a full node? Of course, one could argue that line of thinking should cause someone to question why they got involved with bitcoin in the first place.</p><p>There is a wide range of different opinions on what should be done with the block size, but the general consensus seems to be that “something” needs to be done. Some believe that the block size should be increased to 20 MB, while others find that increase to be too drastic of a change. Others do not see the need for a maximum block size limit to exist at all. It’s vital to listen to as many views on the matter as possible before coming to your own conclusions, which is why we’ve put together this list of seven opinions from some of the most well-respected individuals in the bitcoin ecosystem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>113356@newsletter.paragraph.com (turnert05)</author>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>