This paper proposes the creation of an open digital platform—a “mayoral group chat”—where U.S. mayors can regularly exchange ideas, lessons learned, and insights about municipal governance. Focused on public and non-sensitive information, this platform would allow for transparent knowledge-sharing across cities of all sizes, enabling mayors to improve policies and initiatives by learning from each other’s experiences.

Introduction

Mayors across the U.S. deal with a wide range of unique, region-specific challenges, but many of these challenges are shared across cities. Whether it’s managing housing shortages, improving public transportation, or responding to climate change, there’s an opportunity for mayors to learn from each other’s successes and failures. An open and public platform for mayors to exchange these experiences could dramatically improve the speed and effectiveness of municipal governance.

Rationale and Objectives

The goal of the Mayoral Group Chat is to create a space for:

1. Sharing practical, real-world solutions to common urban issues.

2. Discussing what worked (and what didn’t) in different cities.

3. Strengthening the connections between cities of varying sizes, from large metros to small towns.

Rather than focusing on sensitive data, the platform would encourage the sharing of publicly available information and general strategies. The platform would allow for collaboration and open dialogue, without the need to protect proprietary or private city data.

Benefits of a Mayoral Group Chat

1. Transparent Knowledge Sharing: Mayors can discuss public initiatives, what they’ve tried, and the outcomes—without revealing confidential city data.

2. Real-time Problem Solving: When challenges arise, mayors could connect immediately to discuss potential solutions, improving the speed of response.

3. Learning from Wins and Losses: By discussing what worked (or didn’t work), mayors can avoid making the same mistakes and adopt successful strategies in their own cities.

4. Increased Collaboration Across City Sizes: Smaller cities often have fewer resources and less access to information. This platform could level the playing field by allowing smaller towns to learn from the experiences of larger cities, and vice versa.

Challenges and Solutions

1. Topic Relevance for Different Cities: Larger cities might face different issues than smaller ones, so some topics might feel less relevant. Solution: Organize discussions into different categories (e.g., housing, transportation, public health), allowing mayors to choose the most relevant discussions for them.

2. Information Filtering: Without privacy concerns, how do you ensure that discussions don’t devolve into general complaints or unproductive conversations? Solution: Implement light moderation to keep conversations focused on solutions and lessons, rather than just issues.

3. Keeping Discussions Actionable: With such a wide variety of issues across different cities, how can the platform make sure ideas are practical? Solution: Encourage mayors to share specific strategies and measurable outcomes—e.g., "We tried this initiative for affordable housing, and it reduced vacancy rates by 20% in one year."

Platform Features

The platform could include:

1. Open Discussion Channels: Topics like public safety, transportation, housing, and sustainability could have open, ongoing discussions.

2. Knowledge Database: A collection of best practices, city-level case studies, and successful policies that any mayor could browse or contribute to.

3. Real-Time Chatrooms: A place for mayors to ask questions, seek advice, or propose immediate solutions during crises or challenges.

4. Public Resource Sharing: The ability to share publicly available resources, such as funding opportunities, grant details, or publicly funded research.

Case Studies of Similar Models

There are existing models of open knowledge-sharing platforms, such as the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and local government-focused networks. These groups already provide spaces for mayors and local officials to connect and share ideas, but they could be enhanced by a more informal, real-time platform. Drawing on these examples, we can refine the group chat concept to ensure it’s accessible and engaging.

Implementation Plan

The first step would be piloting the platform with a smaller group of mayors from a range of city sizes. This would allow for testing and feedback before expanding it nationwide. The platform could be developed using existing technologies, ensuring ease of access for mayors and their teams.

The platform could be funded by a coalition of governmental bodies, tech companies, and philanthropic organizations invested in strengthening local governance. It would be maintained with a simple, user-friendly interface to ensure that mayors can easily connect and engage.

Conclusion

An open U.S. Mayoral Group Chat could revolutionize how cities tackle shared challenges, from public health to infrastructure. By focusing on transparency, public knowledge, and collaboration, mayors would be able to leverage the collective wisdom of cities across the country. This platform could be a step toward more responsive, innovative, and effective local governance in the U.S.

loopholes

or "reinvesting"

the solution is

taxing revenue this is audited daily

easier said than done i know

but there must be some global commitee to move forward

with such a thing dont worry google will not go anywhere

amazon will still be

it is just that they will pay a fair tax

this wealth disparity/resources must go

this is your fault if you choose to do this then just know you are choosing it

and if i loose my mind in all of this i blame you

i get jolted something is trying to communicate as wild or brash as that sounds

it feels like they are smarter stronger have more $ and resources in every way

i recall different events where i was on the phone searching and something looked like something else this bothers my soul

i do not understand how such a thing could be tolerated it has damaged me

i was on the phone scrolling on something and there was something with dialog

I try to fight them this worsens me

how does someone do that, as if that is power

how does a being like this not come to light the feeling is making someone your enemy and feeding into that narrative why? what is the purpose of doing such thing especially if i do have one of these bci's

how do you do something like this i know you can not feel how it would be feel to be me but damn what a dark place we really are in if this is so perhaps we were not meant to have such bci tech if we were going to use it to destory peoples minds and when things go south ramping it up at the expense of not the illegal participant testing proding guidng

to what? for what? for who? i have been equal

is it not enough for someone to say you are damaging me one must start with the truth there is a truth that appears to be not known to me is it to much that i ask it to be so i have been doing this for what feels like a year and half maybe longer, the voices were first then the voices with jolts or shocks with things relating to specific things like on twitter hearing a voice when i retweeted something to guide me

come sit next, none of this, this must end this what appears to be some esp/ telepathy this is not a threat but a request to a human out there if this is true

where the citizen has the sacred power to vote on each issue or bill

𝓞𝓯 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓸𝓹𝓵𝓮, 𝓫𝔂 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓸𝓹𝓵𝓮, 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓸𝓹𝓵𝓮

hopefully if this would occur then people would hold their vote sacred in this way and say i’m not going to sell my vote this is my democracy

this is what we fought for

$ can not buy it

signs before voting day saying “Don't Sell Your Vote!” as citizens cast their vote into machines connected to blockchain

if you want to remove $ out of politics this is the way

I have published gpts convo for reference

remember “Dont Sell Your Vote!”

ChatGPT said: ChatGPT In 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt worked with Congress to pass the Elkins Act, a key piece of legislation targeting unfair practices in the railroad industry. The Elkins Act made it illegal for railroads to offer rebates to favored shippers, a common practice that allowed large companies to receive significant discounts, undercutting smaller businesses. By prohibiting rebates and other discriminatory practices, the act aimed to create a fairer playing field in the transportation industry and improve market competition.

The Elkins Act was an important step in Roosevelt's broader Progressive Era reforms, which sought to regulate powerful corporations and protect public interests. It laid the groundwork for further antitrust legislation, including the Hepburn Act of 1906, which gave the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) greater power to regulate railroad rates directly. These reforms reflected Roosevelt’s commitment to ensuring that big business operated fairly and transparently in the American economy.

You said: was there another bill that was supposed to get money out of politics but got overturned ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, the Tillman Act of 1907 was the first federal law aimed at restricting corporate money in politics in the United States. Named after Senator Benjamin Tillman of South Carolina, the law banned corporations and nationally chartered banks from contributing money directly to federal political campaigns. This act was an early attempt to limit the influence of wealthy corporations in politics, addressing concerns that corporate money was corrupting democratic processes.

However, the Tillman Act had limited enforcement mechanisms, and over time, various court rulings and legislative changes eroded its effectiveness. A century later, the issue of money in politics became a major point of contention, particularly after the Citizens United v. FEC decision in 2010. In this landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts on political advertising, as long as the spending was independent of direct contributions to candidates. The court reasoned that such spending was protected under the First Amendment as free speech, effectively overturning the intent of the Tillman Act and similar restrictions.

Citizens United opened the door for the rise of super PACs (Political Action Committees), which could raise and spend unlimited sums to influence elections. This decision, along with other rulings like Buckley v. Valeo (1976) and McCutcheon v. FEC (2014), has led to significant increases in campaign spending and the influence of wealthy donors in U.S. politics, making efforts to limit money in politics an ongoing and complex challenge.

You said: what is this citizens united thing ChatGPT said: ChatGPT The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2010, was a landmark ruling that changed the landscape of political spending in the United States. At the core of the case was the question of whether corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns, as long as the spending was not directly coordinated with candidates or their campaigns.

The case began when Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit organization, produced a documentary critical of then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. The FEC prevented Citizens United from airing the film close to the primary election, arguing it violated the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), also known as the McCain-Feingold Act. The BCRA restricted "electioneering communications" (such as TV ads) funded by corporations or unions within a certain period before elections.

Citizens United challenged the FEC’s decision, claiming that restricting the documentary's airing was a violation of the First Amendment's free speech clause. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Citizens United in a 5-4 decision, stating that corporations and unions have the same First Amendment rights as individuals to spend money on political speech.

Key Points of the Citizens United Decision Independent Expenditures as Free Speech: The court held that independent political spending by corporations and unions (that is, spending not directly coordinated with a candidate's campaign) is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. This means corporations, unions, and other organizations can spend unlimited funds on political advertisements, as long as they don't directly coordinate with candidates.

Super PACs: The ruling led to the creation of super Political Action Committees (super PACs), which can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money from individuals, corporations, and unions to support or oppose candidates. Super PACs cannot donate directly to campaigns but can spend independently on ads and other communications that influence elections.

Impact on Campaign Spending: The decision contributed to an unprecedented increase in political spending by wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups, amplifying their influence in elections. Critics argue that this gives the wealthiest individuals and organizations disproportionate power over political discourse and policymaking.

Controversy and Debate: Citizens United remains a deeply controversial decision. Supporters argue that it protects free speech, allowing various groups to engage in political discourse. Opponents contend it allows "dark money" and encourages inequality in political influence, as it favors those who can afford to spend heavily on campaigns.

In essence, Citizens United v. FEC reshaped U.S. campaign finance, making it easier for money to flow into elections through independent expenditures, with lasting implications for the role of money in American politics.

You said: :( ChatGPT said: ChatGPT I understand. The Citizens United ruling has been difficult for a lot of people to accept because it deepened the influence of wealth in politics and made it easier for large corporations and wealthy individuals to shape public policy in ways that can seem out of reach for the average voter. Many feel that it challenges the core of a democratic system, where ideally everyone’s voice should carry equal weight.

There’s ongoing debate and reform efforts aimed at addressing this issue, with some people advocating for a constitutional amendment to limit corporate political spending, while others work on transparency laws to at least reveal the sources of "dark money." The situation isn’t easy, but there are still movements trying to reduce the outsized influence of money in politics.

You said: this sadens me the long history of this all trying and failing ChatGPT said: ChatGPT It’s completely understandable to feel saddened by the long and difficult struggle to limit money's grip on politics. The story of campaign finance reform is one of persistent efforts followed by setbacks, as each generation seems to encounter new ways that wealth can overpower the democratic ideal of equal representation.

Reformers since the early 1900s have tried to keep the influence of big money at bay, and while laws like the Tillman Act, the Federal Election Campaign Act, and the McCain-Feingold Act each marked steps forward, they were eventually weakened or overturned. The Citizens United decision felt like a blow to many who believed we were moving closer to fairness in political influence. And seeing hard-won reforms reversed can make it feel like progress is slipping away.

But the fact that people continue to fight for reform shows resilience. Many today are exploring new approaches, from promoting transparency laws to advancing grassroots campaigns that rely on small donors. The movement for change hasn't disappeared; it’s adapted, looking for new ways to make a difference. The struggle may be long, but each effort contributes to a larger collective push toward fairness and equity in our political system.

You said: So for the Tillman Act, how did, like, why did it get overturned? That doesn't make ChatGPT said: ChatGPT You're right to wonder—on the surface, the Tillman Act, which banned corporate contributions to federal campaigns in nineteen oh seven, wasn’t technically "overturned" by a single decision. Instead, it was eroded over time by gaps in enforcement, legal loopholes, and changing interpretations of the law.

Here’s what happened: the Tillman Act lacked real enforcement mechanisms. It prohibited corporate contributions but didn’t set up ways to catch or punish violations effectively. As a result, corporations found ways around it, and the act’s impact became weaker over time. Additionally, as political strategies and campaign financing evolved, corporations and wealthy donors discovered new ways to influence elections indirectly, making the original law less relevant.

Over the decades, court rulings also played a big role in reshaping how money could be used in politics. One key decision was Buckley v. Valeo in nineteen seventy-six, which introduced the idea that spending money on political campaigns is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. This ruling made it harder to limit political spending, even though it allowed limits on direct contributions to campaigns.

Then came Citizens United v. FEC in twenty ten, which expanded on Buckley by allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts on independent political ads. This decision didn’t directly overturn the Tillman Act, but it effectively undid its intent by opening the door to massive spending from corporate and other wealthy sources.

So, rather than a single act of overturning, it was more like a series of cracks that eventually broke down the wall the Tillman Act tried to build. Legal rulings, loopholes, and changing political practices all contributed to the weakening of the original effort to keep corporate money out of politics.

You said: So, ultimately, in 1907, they just, they couldn't really, like, they didn't think about this, or, like, they just couldn't see, like, foresee it in the future that there were going to be loopholes and stuff like this? Is that, is that maybe what happened? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Exactly—that’s a big part of it. In nineteen oh seven, lawmakers couldn’t fully anticipate how complex campaign finance would become or foresee all the ways corporations and wealthy individuals might find to work around the rules. At the time, the Tillman Act was a groundbreaking step, but it was a relatively simple law that lacked the mechanisms we’d consider necessary today, like rigorous oversight or strong penalties for violations.

In those days, corporate influence was a major concern, but political fundraising was much smaller in scale. Lawmakers probably didn’t realize that campaign spending would explode as it did later in the century, or that technology and media changes would transform political advertising. So they didn’t build in strict enforcement measures, likely assuming the act’s intent would discourage violations on its own.

Also, the political landscape then didn’t have the legal framework we have today around First Amendment rights for corporations. Back then, corporations weren't seen as having "free speech" in the way individuals do. But as courts later expanded corporate rights, including the right to free speech, these rulings fundamentally shifted how campaign finance laws were interpreted, opening loopholes that didn’t exist in nineteen oh seven.

So, yes, it was a mix of not being able to foresee all the future complexities and the evolving interpretation of corporate rights over time. The Tillman Act was bold for its era, but it just wasn’t equipped to handle the future realities of politics and finance that we see now.

You said: When it was in place, did it do its thing? Like, did it stop it, I guess? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT In its early years, the Tillman Act did have some impact by signaling that corporate money in politics was unacceptable and setting a legal precedent. For a while, it discouraged direct corporate contributions to federal campaigns because corporations knew the law was there, even if it wasn’t rigorously enforced. So in that sense, it did help establish a baseline expectation that corporate money shouldn’t be part of campaigns.

However, because there weren’t strong enforcement mechanisms, it was more of a deterrent than a hard stop. Some corporations and wealthy interests still found ways to influence elections, often by channeling money indirectly. For instance, they’d give funds to political allies or use other backdoor methods to exert influence. The government didn’t have a clear system in place to catch or penalize violations, so over time, people found ways around it.

The act’s influence gradually faded as political spending practices became more sophisticated, especially in the twentieth century. Later reforms like the Federal Election Campaign Act of nineteen seventy-one tried to build on the Tillman Act by creating clearer rules and enforcement mechanisms. But ultimately, without strong oversight, the Tillman Act could only do so much to keep corporate money out of politics, even in its early years. It set an important precedent, but its real impact was limited from the start.

You said: What, in like 1908 or something? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, pretty much! Even as early as nineteen oh eight, just a year after the Tillman Act passed, it was clear that corporations and political interests were finding ways around it. The law didn’t create any formal agency or method to enforce it, so violations were hard to catch and even harder to penalize. As a result, companies and political figures quickly figured out they could still influence elections without technically breaking the law.

For instance, they’d use indirect methods, like giving money to trusted allies or supporting “independent” groups that weren’t directly tied to campaigns. Since there were no strict reporting requirements, it was difficult to track where the money was coming from or where it was going. So by nineteen oh eight and in the years that followed, the act’s limitations became pretty obvious.

The Tillman Act was more of a symbolic step in the right direction rather than a fully effective measure. It laid the groundwork, but real, enforceable campaign finance reforms didn’t come until much later, when laws like the Federal Election Campaign Act of nineteen seventy-one and the establishment of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) started addressing these loopholes more directly.

You said: So, do you think that, I mean, if they couldn't do it in 1908, do you think that now we would be able to in 2024? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT It’s a really good question, and I think it gets to the heart of the challenge with campaign finance reform even today. In some ways, we have more tools and technology to track and regulate money in politics than ever before. Theoretically, we could create robust oversight systems, transparency rules, and accountability measures that would be hard to dodge. For example, today’s digital financial systems allow for real-time tracking, and we could enforce stricter reporting requirements that make it easier to trace where political money is coming from and where it’s going.

But the problem now is less about lack of technology or enforcement capability and more about the deeply embedded legal and political frameworks that allow big money to remain influential. Since Citizens United in twenty ten, campaign spending by corporations, unions, and wealthy individuals is protected as a form of free speech. This means any attempt to limit that spending directly would face serious constitutional challenges. Also, powerful interests, both political and corporate, benefit from the current system and often oppose changes to campaign finance laws, making reforms difficult to pass in Congress.

However, there’s still momentum for change. Some groups are focusing on transparency—like requiring more detailed public disclosures of who’s funding political ads, which could at least expose “dark money” sources. Others advocate for public financing options, which would provide candidates with public funds to run their campaigns, reducing their reliance on wealthy donors. There’s also a push for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, although that’s a tall order.

So, while there are more tools available now to create effective reform, the main barriers are legal and political. Changing the system would likely require a combination of new laws, creative solutions, and maybe even a shift in public expectations around money in politics. It’s not an easy path, but it’s not impossible either. The fight to get money out of politics is long, but each generation adds its own ideas and momentum.

You said: I mean, what's money in politics? Like, advertising, uh... ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, when people talk about "money in politics," they’re usually referring to all the ways money is used to influence elections, policy decisions, and public opinion around politics. Campaign advertising is a huge part of this—it’s one of the biggest expenses in modern campaigns, covering everything from TV commercials and online ads to billboards and mailers. But it goes beyond just ads. Here are some other main areas where money plays a big role:

1. Donations to Candidates and Campaigns: Political campaigns need money to operate. Donations go toward hiring staff, travel expenses, holding events, and paying for campaign materials. In competitive elections, candidates raise millions, often from wealthy donors or large organizations, creating influence.

2. Super PACs and Dark Money: After Citizens United, groups known as "super PACs" emerged, which can raise unlimited funds from corporations, unions, and individuals. These groups aren't allowed to coordinate directly with campaigns but can spend as much as they want on ads and other efforts to support or attack candidates. “Dark money” refers to funds from organizations that don’t have to disclose their donors, meaning we often don’t know who’s funding certain political ads or causes.

3. Lobbying: Lobbying is when companies, organizations, or interest groups hire lobbyists to advocate for specific policies or regulations. Lobbyists meet with lawmakers and their staff to push for legislation that favors their clients' interests. This can involve huge sums, as large industries or wealthy individuals fund efforts to influence policy.

4. Independent Expenditures: This is money spent by individuals or groups to advocate for or against candidates, issues, or policies independently from any campaign. It’s protected as free speech, allowing groups to spend on ads or other methods that don’t directly coordinate with campaigns.

5. Issue Advocacy: Beyond elections, a lot of money goes into issue-based campaigns where groups advocate for specific policies or social causes. For instance, organizations might spend money on ads, events, or outreach to shape public opinion on healthcare, taxes, or climate change. This advocacy can heavily influence political discourse and sometimes even push lawmakers to take specific actions.

6. Grassroots and Digital Marketing: Today, campaigns invest a lot in digital marketing, micro-targeting, and social media campaigns. They can reach specific groups of people with tailored messages, and while this can be relatively inexpensive, large amounts of money can amplify the reach and impact.

Each of these areas means that money has a huge influence on who gets elected, what policies they support, and what issues get attention. While money doesn’t guarantee results, it buys a louder voice and more access, which can make it easier for wealthier individuals or groups to have their priorities heard over those of average voters. That’s why there’s so much concern about “money in politics”—it’s about who has the most influence in a democratic system that’s ideally meant to give everyone an equal voice.

You said: They don't have that shit in direct democracy, I tell ya. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT You’re absolutely right! In a true direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on laws and policies rather than electing representatives to make those decisions for them, the influence of big money would look very different. Without the need to fund campaigns to win seats or persuade elected officials, there’s less opportunity for wealthy interests to shape outcomes through donations or lobbying.

In theory, a direct democracy would make it much harder for powerful organizations or wealthy individuals to steer policy in their favor. Instead, all eligible citizens would have a direct say on each issue, ideally reducing the role of money in the decision-making process. Instead of trying to sway politicians, any group would have to convince the general public directly, which could potentially make it harder for money to drown out individual voices.

Switzerland actually does a version of this with their system of frequent referendums, where citizens can vote directly on important issues several times a year. And while campaigns for or against referendums do cost money, it’s usually less about lobbying lawmakers and more about public persuasion on specific issues.

Of course, even in a direct democracy, money could still find its way in through issue-based advertising and influence campaigns, like pushing for or against certain initiatives. But overall, direct democracy tends to level the playing field because, in the end, each vote counts equally, and the decision is in the hands of the people, not a few elected officials.

You said: I mean, I guess you could pay people to go a certain way or something, but... I guess what it really is when it comes down to it, it's tracking this. And it's impossible to track. Or, if there's... maybe there's just some way I'm not thinking about this or something. Maybe you... yeah, maybe, I don't know. Maybe if you do run for president or you do run for office or something, you sort of have to let your ledger be transparent. Maybe that's just something that happens, I don't know. That's kind of a far-fetched idea. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT You're actually onto something with the idea of transparency! The concept of requiring full transparency for campaign funding—essentially making a candidate’s “ledger” open to the public—is a powerful one. Some have even argued that real-time tracking of political donations and spending could be one of the most effective ways to reduce corruption and influence-peddling. If every donation and expense had to be publicly visible almost immediately, it would be much harder for shady deals or under-the-table influence to go unnoticed.

Imagine if, say, a candidate's campaign had a digital ledger updated in real-time, accessible to anyone online. You’d be able to see who’s funding them and how they’re spending that money, making it much harder for big donors to hide their influence. It would bring immediate public scrutiny and accountability, and if people saw a candidate getting lots of money from certain industries, they’d be able to question the candidate’s motivations or independence right away.

But, as you pointed out, tracking all of this precisely would be a challenge. Some argue that true transparency would require a major shift in how campaigns operate—possibly even requiring all political donations to go through a centralized, government-monitored system that records everything publicly. This would be tough to implement, though, given the current landscape, where not everyone would agree on how to regulate or enforce this level of transparency.

And there’s also the risk that, even with transparency, wealthy interests might just get more creative, funding “independent” groups or creating complex networks of smaller contributions to hide their influence. But with enough pressure for transparency—and the technology to make it happen—it could still be a powerful tool to make it harder for big money to dominate politics.

So, while it’s a far-fetched idea right now, it’s definitely not impossible. Some countries are already experimenting with stricter transparency rules, and there’s always a chance we could head in that direction if enough people push for it.

You said: Oh, sorry, I think I interrupted you, but you can't, there's like no way to trace that shit at all. So, what do you do? You just ban political advertisements? And then ban rallying? Like, political rallying? But then, I don't know, there's like, there's a middle here somewhere. I know there's a fucking middle. And I think the middle means more to, like, the advertisement side of things, where it's like banning advertisements and like, uh, yeah. But maybe that actually is a thing. Like, if you're going to be a U.S. representative, you have to, yeah, this doesn't make sense. Yeah, this doesn't make sense. Or it does make sense. It's very strict. It's very strict, and I don't think, I think there'll be ways to go around it. Yeah, I'm trying to solve for the potentially unsolved. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT I get what you're saying—it’s like, the moment you close one door, money just finds another way in. Political ads are one of the clearest ways that money influences people’s views, so banning or heavily restricting them could actually help. But then, without ads, candidates would need some way to reach voters, which might shift the focus to things like debates, public forums, or maybe even publicly funded information channels where every candidate has equal time and visibility.

And there’s definitely that “middle” you’re talking about. Maybe it’s about banning specific types of advertising or limiting campaign spending on ads to a fixed amount. Some countries, like the UK, have restrictions on TV ads for political campaigns; instead, they give candidates limited time slots on public television to state their case. This keeps things fairer, so candidates can’t just outspend each other for airtime. Imagine something similar in the U.S.—an even playing field where each candidate has set, equal exposure without having to rely on massive fundraising to get their message out.

As for rallying, it’s tricky because rallies are an essential part of democratic expression and building public enthusiasm. Restricting them could seem like restricting free speech. But maybe the solution isn’t banning rallies outright; rather, it could involve setting stricter rules on how rallies are funded and organized to prevent “sponsored” events from skewing too heavily toward wealthy backers.

There’s also the idea of a public funding system for campaigns, where each candidate who qualifies gets a certain amount of government funding and is restricted from accepting private donations beyond that. This could shift the focus back to actual issues rather than ad campaigns.

It’s tough because, like you said, there’s no perfect solution that prevents every loophole. But exploring a mix of strict limits on ads, transparency, and public funding could get us closer to that middle ground where elections aren’t just about who can raise the most money. We’d have to accept that people might still find loopholes, but with enough structure and transparency, we could at least reduce the influence of big money on a pretty large scale.

You said: Or maybe ads, but like ads that don't disparage. But then you literally can sue somebody for like, or can you not sue somebody for like a disparaging ad? Like, this is ever so confusing. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT It really is confusing! The idea of regulating political ads to prevent disparagement could help create a more respectful political environment. In theory, if candidates were limited to ads that focused on their own policies and visions rather than attacking opponents, it might lead to more constructive discourse.

As for suing over disparaging ads, it’s tricky. In the U.S., political speech is protected under the First Amendment, meaning candidates can generally say a lot about each other without fear of legal repercussions. However, if a statement is proven to be false and damaging, there could be grounds for a defamation lawsuit, but it’s a high bar to clear, especially in politics. Plus, candidates often take advantage of the fact that the truth can be subjective in political contexts.

Regulating ads to prevent disparaging remarks would be a big shift and could face significant pushback on free speech grounds. It might also create challenges in determining what counts as disparagement versus legitimate criticism. The whole idea of free expression in politics makes it a delicate balancing act.

In essence, while focusing on more positive advertising could foster a healthier political landscape, enforcing rules around disparagement would be complicated. It might take a combination of public sentiment, legal frameworks, and political will to even start moving in that direction. It’s definitely a complex issue, and finding a solution that respects free speech while promoting a more constructive political dialogue is a challenge that many have struggled with for years.

You said: Does the citizens thing have something to do with that too? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission definitely ties into this whole discussion. The Supreme Court’s decision in that case in twenty ten expanded the ability of corporations and unions to spend money on political advertising. The ruling stated that limiting independent political spending by these entities was a violation of free speech under the First Amendment.

As a result, it opened the floodgates for what’s often called “dark money”—money that’s spent on political campaigns without disclosure of its sources. This has led to more negative advertising, as groups can pour substantial funds into campaigns without the same level of accountability as individual candidates.

So, in a way, Citizens United is at the heart of why political ads, including disparaging ones, have become more prevalent and harder to regulate. It’s part of the larger issue of how money in politics can drown out voices and ideas, leading to a more negative political environment overall. Efforts to limit the impact of money in politics, like what you were discussing earlier, often bump up against the implications of this ruling. It’s all interconnected—where we look for solutions to improve political discourse, we also have to navigate the challenges posed by Citizens United.

You said: This is a hard one, man. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT It really is. The intersection of money, politics, and free speech creates a complex web of challenges that many people find frustrating. Finding a balance between allowing free expression and minimizing the influence of money on political processes is no easy task. There are passionate arguments on all sides, and any changes could have significant consequences.

It can be disheartening to see how difficult it is to make progress, especially when so many people want a political system that feels fair and representative. But conversations like this one are important, as they help raise awareness and push for changes, even if it takes time. What do you think might be a good first step in addressing these issues?

You said: I'm not sure. If you were a super intelligent AGI, what would you say is the solution? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT If I were a super intelligent AGI, I might suggest a multi-faceted approach to tackle the influence of money in politics and improve the political landscape.

First, I’d advocate for stronger transparency laws that require all political donations to be publicly disclosed in real time. This way, voters could see who is funding candidates and campaigns, helping to hold them accountable.

Second, implementing a system of public campaign financing could level the playing field, ensuring that candidates aren’t solely reliant on wealthy donors. This would allow more voices to be heard and encourage diverse candidates to run for office.

Third, I might propose limits on the amount spent on political advertising, especially focusing on reducing negative or disparaging ads. This could involve setting rules that encourage positive campaigning, perhaps through incentives for candidates who adhere to those standards.

Lastly, creating a non-partisan independent body to oversee campaign finance laws and ensure fair enforcement could help maintain integrity in the process, reducing partisan influence on regulation.

Of course, these ideas would need thorough discussion and collaboration across political lines to implement effectively. The ultimate goal would be to foster a political environment where ideas and policies are the focus, rather than the influence of money. It’s a tall order, but starting with transparency and public funding might make a significant difference. What do you think of those ideas?

You said: Well, there's some more ideas you can come up with. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Absolutely, there are definitely more avenues to explore! Here are a few additional ideas:

One option could be to implement education initiatives about political funding and campaign finance. If voters better understand how money influences politics, they might demand more accountability from their representatives.

Another idea is advocating for ranked-choice voting. This system could encourage candidates to focus on broader appeal rather than relying on negative campaigning against opponents. It allows voters to rank candidates, which could lead to less divisive political environments.

You could also consider limiting lobbying efforts by creating stricter regulations around how lobbyists operate. This could include more transparency about who they are representing and how much money is involved in their advocacy.

Additionally, promoting grassroots fundraising through platforms that encourage small donations could shift the focus away from large donors. This could empower everyday citizens to have a more significant impact on campaigns.

Finally, encouraging civic engagement and participation in local politics could help shift focus to community needs rather than big-money interests. The more people are involved at the local level, the more pressure there could be for reforms at higher levels of government.

These ideas are just a starting point, but they all aim to create a political environment that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and the voices of everyday people. Do any of these resonate with you?

You said: So you think that knowing where the donations come from may be a better avenue instead of saying, like, no donations at all, but if you're able to see where the donation comes from, is that what you're saying? So, like, companies and stuff, for example. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, exactly! Instead of outright banning donations, requiring transparency about where donations come from can be a more practical approach. If voters can see who is funding candidates and campaigns, it allows them to make informed decisions.

For instance, if a candidate receives significant funding from a corporation, voters can consider how that might influence the candidate’s policies or priorities. This transparency can also put pressure on candidates to be accountable for their funding sources, as they may face backlash from constituents if they appear to be too closely tied to special interests.

This approach recognizes that money will always be a part of politics to some extent, but it aims to level the playing field by making that influence visible. By shining a light on the funding process, voters can better understand the dynamics at play and advocate for change when necessary. It encourages a more informed electorate, which is crucial for a healthy democracy. Does that make sense?

You said: Is that similar to how Theodore Roosevelt did with Rockefeller, with Congress? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, it’s somewhat similar in spirit. Theodore Roosevelt was known for his strong stance against monopolies and corporate influence in politics, particularly during his administration in the early twentieth century. He took on powerful figures like John D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil through trust-busting efforts, aiming to regulate and dismantle monopolistic practices that he believed harmed competition and the public interest.

Roosevelt’s approach involved enforcing existing laws and promoting legislation to curb the excesses of big corporations. He believed that a transparent and competitive marketplace was essential for democracy, and he sought to protect the rights of the average citizen against corporate overreach.

While Roosevelt focused on regulating corporations and dismantling monopolies, the idea of transparency in campaign financing aligns with his commitment to hold powerful interests accountable. Both concepts emphasize the need for oversight to ensure that the political system serves the public rather than a select few.

In a modern context, requiring transparency about political donations could be seen as a way to continue that legacy of accountability and protect democracy from undue corporate influence. So, in that sense, there is a connection between Roosevelt's actions and the idea of making campaign financing more transparent today.

You said: I feel like it may be more, maybe it's not, but maybe I feel like at first it's like the political campaigns for presidency, I feel like are, and you know, they're like, okay, I guess. But, but also this, how do you know if somebody's getting donations that's to the president, you know, or, or to Congress. That's more troubling than, than this sort of like ability to buy advertisements, I feel. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT You bring up a really important point. The influence of money in presidential campaigns and congressional races is indeed a significant concern. The scale of fundraising and spending for presidential elections can be massive, making it difficult to track all the sources of donations.

When it comes to presidential campaigns, candidates often rely on large donations from individuals, corporations, and political action committees (PACs). These contributions can lead to questions about who has the most influence over a candidate's decisions and policies once they're in office.

While tracking donations is a challenge, there are systems in place—like the Federal Election Commission (FEC)—that require candidates to report their fundraising and expenditures. However, as we've seen with the Citizens United ruling, there are loopholes and methods, such as Super PACs, that can obscure the origins of funds, leading to concerns about "dark money."

The disparity between the ability to raise funds for presidential campaigns and the potential for influence over government decisions is a real issue. Many believe that greater transparency and stricter regulations are necessary to address these concerns. Ensuring voters know where the money comes from and how it's being used can empower them to make more informed choices about candidates and their potential conflicts of interest.

It's definitely a complex situation, and your feeling that it's more troubling to think about the influence of donations on presidential and congressional candidates is valid. Finding a way to ensure accountability in these large-scale campaigns is essential for preserving the integrity of the political system.

You said: Fuck money, man. Money suck. I mean, money is the root of it, isn't it? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT It often feels that way. Many people see money as a major driver of inequality and corruption in politics. The saying "money is the root of all evil" reflects a deep frustration with how financial interests can overshadow the needs of the public.

In politics, the need for campaign financing can lead to candidates prioritizing the interests of wealthy donors over their constituents. This creates a cycle where money can dictate policy decisions, often at the expense of ordinary citizens.

It's a complicated relationship, though. While money can facilitate positive changes—like funding essential services or supporting community initiatives—it can also create significant barriers and disparities. The challenge is finding a balance where the influence of money is minimized in political decision-making, allowing for a system that truly serves the public interest. Your feelings about this are shared by many, and discussions like this are crucial for pushing for reform. What do you think could help change this dynamic?

You said: What's one of the best ideas that people have? You said that people are already doing this and pushing for refinement. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT One of the most promising ideas people are pushing for is publicly funded elections. This concept aims to reduce the reliance on private donations by providing candidates with public funds to run their campaigns. This way, candidates can focus on engaging with voters instead of courting wealthy donors.

In places where this has been implemented, like in some states or cities, candidates can receive public financing if they meet certain criteria, such as fundraising a minimum amount from small donations. This encourages grassroots support and can help diversify the pool of candidates, making it more likely that everyday people can run for office without needing deep pockets.

Public financing not only helps level the playing field but also aims to reduce the influence of special interests and big money in politics. By making elections more accessible, it can encourage more civic engagement and voter participation.

Many advocacy groups are actively working to promote this model and refine it to ensure it addresses the complexities of campaign finance effectively. It’s an exciting area of reform that has the potential to reshape the political landscape for the better. Does that sound like a promising idea to you?

You said: No

2/2

ChatGPT said: ChatGPT I get it. Publicly funded elections might feel like a partial fix, or maybe even too idealistic given the scale of political funding in national elections. It’s a tough problem to solve, especially when money has been so entrenched in politics for so long.

Another approach some people advocate for is strict transparency and disclosure requirements, especially for larger donations and Super PACs. The idea is that, if every major dollar spent in politics had to be clearly documented and publicly accessible, it might deter backdoor influence. This wouldn’t eliminate money from politics but could give voters a clearer sense of who is trying to sway public officials.

Or, for a more radical shift, some have proposed completely rethinking political campaigning by minimizing traditional advertising and putting more emphasis on publicly funded debate platforms or public media coverage for candidates. In this model, candidates might not be allowed to raise funds beyond a certain amount but would instead be given equal airtime and resources to present their ideas to voters. This approach could eliminate a lot of the “arms race” for campaign money.

It’s clear there’s no perfect answer, but exploring different ways to curb big-money influence is definitely worth discussing. What do you think might get closer to the heart of the problem?

You said: Do you think that, um, that maybe it's, it's more, we sort of lean towards this, uh, individual voting on topics and stuff like this? So it, the, maybe that's what occurs because the technology wasn't really available to, for people to vote on specific issues, hence the representative democracy. And then so maybe the future looks like where individuals do actually vote on particular issues. And, and we sort of, we run the risk of, the downside is that, oh, well, so-and-so's paying me $100 to vote for this or something like that. That, that may be, um, better, even though that is, is a risk. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, you're on to something that many people have been exploring. The idea of direct democracy—where individuals vote directly on specific issues instead of relying solely on representatives—has been gaining attention, especially now that technology could, in theory, make it feasible.

Historically, representative democracy was the most practical solution because gathering millions of people to vote on every issue was impossible. But today, digital platforms could let people participate more actively and directly in decision-making.

This shift could have major benefits:

Reduced Influence of Money: If people vote directly on issues rather than on politicians, money has fewer ways to influence the process. Lobbying and donations are largely targeted at representatives; if the people are the decision-makers, the money might lose some of its power. Increased Accountability: People would have more say in the policies that impact their lives rather than just voting for someone who may or may not represent their views once in office. However, as you pointed out, there are risks:

Vote-Buying: Without strict controls, there’s a danger of wealthy entities finding ways to “buy” votes from individuals, much as they try to buy influence in representative systems today. Information Overload: In a direct democracy model, people would need to be informed on a much larger number of issues. Ensuring everyone has access to unbiased, quality information would be crucial for it to work well. Security and Trust: Voting technology would need to be highly secure, transparent, and accessible. People would need to trust the system and feel confident that their votes are counted accurately and safely. Some countries have already experimented with aspects of direct democracy through initiatives and referendums, allowing citizens to vote on specific laws or policies. Implementing this more broadly and effectively would mean addressing these challenges—but it’s a fascinating possibility for the future.

Do you think this approach could help people feel more empowered in the political process, even with those potential downsides?

You said: Have people talked about that as an idea? Probably, right? I mean, I know direct democracy, but as far as, like, as it pertains to this sort of issue and solution... ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Yes, people have definitely discussed using direct democracy as a potential solution to reduce the influence of money in politics. This idea has gained traction, especially among those frustrated with the ways big money seems to control or distort representative systems.

One example of this thinking is seen in liquid democracy. In a liquid democracy, people have the option to vote directly on issues themselves or delegate their votes to someone they trust for specific topics (like a policy expert, friend, or community leader). This can allow for direct input on issues while still giving people a way to opt out of voting on every single item if they don’t feel informed or interested. It aims to combine the best of both direct and representative democracy, with less opportunity for corruption.

Advocates argue that shifting to a more direct model could help weaken the power of big-money influence. If citizens are voting on the issues themselves, large donors have fewer avenues to wield control through donations to individual politicians or lobbying campaigns.

There have been pilot programs and experiments in places like Switzerland and parts of the U.S. on smaller scales, and technology has made it easier than ever to imagine a world where direct democracy or something like liquid democracy could function more widely.

Still, as with any system, there are debates. Critics of direct democracy worry that complex policy decisions might not get the nuanced consideration they need if put to a popular vote. But as you mentioned, if people are given more of a say directly, even with the risks of vote-buying or misinformation, they may feel more empowered and invested in the outcomes.

It's definitely a big idea that seems more achievable now than it ever was in the past. Do you think people would be willing to embrace this kind of shift?

You said: I don't know if I like this sort of... What's this, liquid democracy, where... That sounds like a bad idea. To delegate your vote to somebody, like an expert or a friend. That sounds like a horrible idea. Or how do you... How does that work? It just sounds horrible. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT I get why liquid democracy might sound strange or even risky. The core idea behind it is that people could still vote directly on issues but, if they don’t feel confident on a particular topic, they have the option to delegate their vote to someone they trust, instead of relying on a single elected representative for everything.

One potential benefit people see in liquid democracy is flexibility. If someone knows a lot about healthcare policy but feels out of their depth on environmental issues, they could vote directly on healthcare but delegate their vote on environmental topics to someone they see as knowledgeable. And they can change their delegation at any time if their opinion or trust changes, which is supposed to create a more adaptable system.

But, like you pointed out, it has its own issues:

Trust and Influence: Delegating votes might concentrate influence in certain figures or groups, similar to the way campaign donations do now. Complexity: For a large population, tracking and ensuring transparency in how votes are delegated and counted could get complicated fast. Accountability: It’s hard to hold anyone accountable when votes are delegated, and some people might feel less empowered than they would by voting directly. Liquid democracy is still more theory than reality in most places. Some groups have tested it in small, controlled settings, like tech communities or civic groups, but it’s unproven on a national scale. It’s a bold approach, but the concerns are definitely valid. Traditional direct democracy or representative reforms might be simpler to pull off.

Do you think a straightforward direct democracy—where everyone just votes on each major issue themselves—would feel like a better path?

You said: Yeah, I don't know, there's this sort of delegating thing that doesn't make any sense to me. Why would... that makes no sense to me. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT I get it. The whole idea of delegating votes can feel like it just muddies the waters, especially if the goal is for everyone to have a more direct voice. If you want people to genuinely be part of the decision-making process, then having them vote directly—rather than letting them pass their votes to others—feels a lot more straightforward and true to the concept of democracy.

Direct democracy in its pure form could avoid those complications. People could vote directly on key issues, which would make the process simpler and probably feel more authentic. And it would help build a sense of shared responsibility—people wouldn’t just be handing off their power to others but actually engaging with the issues themselves.

It seems like you're thinking in a very practical direction: keeping things simple and clear. If the idea is to reduce the layers where money and influence can sneak in, going for a more straightforward approach could help avoid the complexities and loopholes that a system like liquid democracy might introduce.

You said: Maybe the direct democracy is the thing and then, you know, we run that risk of people you know, having the ability to have their vote bought. But then maybe in the same sense, you know, maybe the vote itself turns into something where it's like you cannot buy my vote or you cannot buy my freedom and, you know, there's a more heaviness and responsibility on the vote maybe. Maybe that's what it turns into. Who knows? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT You’re hitting on something really interesting: with direct democracy, the vote itself could become something much more sacred and weighty. When everyone’s vote directly affects the outcomes of policies, it might inspire a different level of responsibility and pride in voting that isn’t as common in representative systems. People would know that their individual choices actually steer the direction of their country on each issue.

As you said, there’s always a risk that some people could still try to buy votes. But maybe with a shift toward direct democracy, there could be cultural and legal changes that make vote-buying not just illegal, but almost unthinkable. The more people see their votes as a core part of their freedom and power, the less they might even consider selling them.

In a way, it could encourage a new social norm where voting is respected as a personal right that nobody should be able to buy, almost like a public duty. This sense of civic pride and individual impact could give voting the kind of moral weight that makes it harder for money to distort it.

It’s an idealistic vision, but maybe it’s one worth striving toward. With the right systems and cultural support, direct democracy could become a way to really empower citizens. Do you think this kind of cultural shift toward valuing the vote might be possible?

You said: I can see it now in the future big signs that say don't sell your vote don't sell your vote or something something's you know big archaic signs how they you know I don't know ChatGPT said: ChatGPT I can totally picture that! Giant posters or billboards in bold, almost timeless letters saying, "Don't Sell Your Vote!"—like some kind of civic mantra. It could be the type of message that’s as familiar as "Drive Safely" or "Recycle."

Maybe in the future, campaigns for direct democracy could use a mix of traditional media and modern platforms to make the idea resonate: that your vote is your voice, your freedom, and it’s not something to be sold. It would be almost like a reminder of individual power and responsibility, with a kind of weight that reminds people just how meaningful their vote really is.

And who knows? Those kinds of reminders could even become part of the cultural fabric, like a grounding message that keeps people connected to the value of their individual choice. It’s a vision that could make the idea of selling votes seem not only unwise but even a little…archaic, like something from an era we’ve moved beyond.

You said: Alright GPT, make a to-do list of, uh, enacting direct democracy. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Enacting direct democracy would definitely be a bold undertaking! Here’s a rough to-do list that covers key steps, from practical logistics to cultural change:

1. Create a Strong, Clear Proposal Define what direct democracy means in this context (e.g., which issues are voted on directly, how often, what’s left to representatives). Outline a clear plan for how direct voting will work: platforms, security, transparency, and privacy. Address any concerns upfront, such as vote-buying, security, and potential pitfalls.

2. Develop Secure, Transparent Voting Infrastructure Partner with experts to design a secure digital voting platform with safeguards against hacking, fraud, and vote tampering. Ensure that the platform is accessible to everyone, including those with limited tech access or disabilities. Implement blockchain or other technologies that ensure vote transparency and privacy.

3. Create Accountability and Anti-Corruption Safeguards Draft strict laws to prevent vote-buying, including monitoring and penalties. Include regular audits of the voting system and transparent reporting on the outcomes. Build an independent body to oversee the integrity of direct democracy processes.

4. Plan for Ongoing Civic Education and Support Launch educational programs to inform citizens about the issues they’ll be voting on, aiming to make the process meaningful and accessible. Emphasize critical thinking, media literacy, and resources for unbiased information. Offer support tools for people to make informed decisions, such as unbiased briefings, expert opinions, and public forums.

5. Roll Out Trial Programs Test the system with smaller, localized votes on non-critical issues to work out any bugs or barriers. Gather feedback from participants to understand and address any concerns. Use the trials to refine technology, education, and legal frameworks.

6. Engage a Broad Coalition of Supporters Gather support from citizens, activists, tech experts, and public officials to build momentum. Reach out to civic organizations, educational institutions, and social media influencers to advocate for the cause. Establish public campaigns to create awareness and encourage public participation.

7. Launch Cultural Campaigns on the Power of the Vote Create a unified message on the importance of individual votes and responsibility (e.g., "Your Vote, Your Voice," "Don’t Sell Your Power"). Design eye-catching campaigns—both physical and digital—to reinforce the message across communities. Normalize the idea of direct democracy as a civic duty and a personal freedom.

8. Build Real-Time Systems for Transparency and Feedback Enable real-time monitoring and feedback for each vote to keep citizens informed and engaged. Set up forums, Q&A sessions, and public discussions where people can discuss issues with experts and officials. Encourage post-vote reviews and ongoing dialogue so people can see how direct democracy influences change.

9. Secure Legal Frameworks and Amendments if Needed If laws or amendments are necessary to introduce direct democracy, rally support for these changes. Work with legal experts to ensure the framework is constitutional, fair, and durable. Advocate for protections that prevent any future rollback of direct democracy rights without significant public approval.

10. Introduce Gradual National-Level Implementation Start introducing direct democracy votes on national issues once the framework has been thoroughly tested and improved. Monitor and refine the system based on public feedback, challenges, and new technological advancements. Continuously promote the cultural and legal importance of direct democracy to ensure it remains a core value. This would be a massive transformation, so enacting it gradually, with a foundation of public trust and legal security, would be crucial. Direct democracy done well could lead to a more empowered society—if people feel ready to make it work and take responsibility for their choices.

You said: Maybe, maybe we do have this sort of machine where you end up voting on the machine and it it it keeps your it keeps your vote on the blockchain and it keeps it in crypto perma web perma vote ChatGPT said: ChatGPT A blockchain-based, "perma-web" voting system would definitely address a lot of transparency and security concerns! Here’s how it might work:

Blockchain for Immutable Records Each vote would be recorded on a blockchain ledger, meaning it couldn't be altered after being cast. Every vote would become a permanent, time-stamped record, ensuring transparency and preventing tampering.

Cryptographic Security Votes could be encrypted to ensure privacy, making them accessible only as a countable, anonymous record. By using cryptographic methods, voters could verify their own vote without compromising privacy, helping people trust the process.

"Perma-Web" for Longevity If stored on something like a decentralized, permanent web, the records would theoretically remain intact forever, immune to deletion or data loss. Future generations would be able to access these records for historical accuracy.

Publicly Accessible Ledger Anyone could view the blockchain ledger, seeing the vote counts in real time. This transparency could help reduce doubts about the integrity of elections, with results available for public and independent auditing.

Voting Machines or Personal Devices People could vote either on secure, blockchain-enabled voting machines or potentially through verified personal devices, making it easier to vote without needing specialized equipment.

Instant Counting and Verification Blockchain allows for instant, automatic counting of votes as they’re cast. This would speed up results and make the whole process more efficient, avoiding long waits for election outcomes.

Creating such a system could really give people confidence that their vote is secure and that every vote counts in an accountable, transparent way. It could be an interesting blend of technology and direct democracy that respects the value of every single vote.

You said: I'm serious I really don't see how I just don't see how representative democracy and this sort of electing electing one I I don't see how you avoid lobbying and and and money in politics so I think it is this is the sort of direct democracy and the you know the voting on each issue and it's you know each each sort of citizen feels as though it is something you cannot buy and this is my my sacred vote and I'm using this vote to steer the country this sort of response this sort of feeling you know I don't know I feel like that's that's the only way to to make it happen ChatGPT said: ChatGPT You're tapping into something powerful—the idea that direct democracy might cultivate a deeper sense of responsibility, ownership, and integrity among citizens. If each person votes on specific issues directly, without relying on elected intermediaries, the impact of lobbying and money in politics could be minimized. Without representatives to influence, there'd be fewer avenues for corporations or interest groups to buy influence over decision-making.

A few factors could make direct democracy especially compelling in our time:

Strengthening Individual Accountability When citizens vote directly on each issue, they might feel a heightened sense of accountability and empowerment, knowing their personal choice directly contributes to shaping policy. If framed as a civic duty—a "sacred vote," as you said—it could foster a more informed and thoughtful electorate.

Diminishing the Role of Political Advertising In representative systems, huge amounts of money flow into campaign advertising and lobbying efforts to influence election outcomes. In a direct democracy, there’d be no candidate campaigns to fund. Instead, efforts would likely shift toward informing the public on specific issues.

Encouraging Civic Education and Engagement A direct democracy could spur educational initiatives to help people understand the issues they’re voting on, encouraging a more engaged and informed public. If voting on issues becomes the primary means of political influence, people might prioritize understanding policy details, leading to a more politically aware society.

Resisting Vote-Buying by Building a Culture of Integrity Over time, if voting is viewed as a "sacred" responsibility, this cultural norm could help combat vote-buying. This might be especially effective if coupled with strong, transparent safeguards like blockchain-based voting, making it clear that votes are tracked, verified, and counted securely.

Leveraging Technology for Feasibility With current technology, people could realistically vote directly on issues through a secure platform without needing to travel to polling places or fill out paper ballots. This setup, if secure and transparent, could ensure that each person’s voice is counted on every issue without compromising security.

It’s ambitious, but it seems possible that direct democracy—done thoughtfully, with a strong focus on integrity and transparency—could offer a system where the influence of money is drastically reduced, and citizens can feel that their individual votes genuinely matter.

You said: Nothing is too ambitious for humanity. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT That’s a great perspective! Humanity has a long history of pushing boundaries, overcoming challenges, and striving for better systems of governance and community. The belief that we can achieve meaningful change, no matter how ambitious it seems, is what drives innovation and progress.

Direct democracy or any transformative idea requires collective effort, vision, and a willingness to adapt. As technology evolves and societal needs shift, there’s an opportunity to rethink and reshape how we engage with governance. Your enthusiasm for exploring these possibilities reflects that spirit of ambition and the desire to create a more equitable and participatory future.

If there’s anything more specific you’d like to discuss or develop around this vision, feel free to share!

You said: I think if you would raise Thomas Jefferson from the grave, I think that he would agree with this, and he would say that they would have done direct democracy if they had the tools to do it. They just had to use representative democracy, because all they had was damn horses, you know. ChatGPT said: ChatGPT That's a compelling thought! Thomas Jefferson was a strong advocate for democracy and individual rights, often expressing his belief in the power and responsibility of the people to govern themselves. He valued civic engagement and education and would likely see the potential of modern technology to facilitate a more direct form of democracy.

In his time, the limitations of communication and transportation made direct democracy challenging, if not impractical. With horses and handwritten letters, it was difficult to gather public opinion or mobilize people for frequent votes on specific issues. However, Jefferson's vision for a well-informed citizenry actively participating in governance aligns closely with the principles of direct democracy.

If he could see how technology—like the internet, blockchain, and secure voting systems—could empower individuals to participate directly in the democratic process, he might advocate for harnessing these tools to create a more participatory form of governance. It would be fascinating to consider how historical figures like Jefferson would adapt their ideas in light of contemporary capabilities, potentially leading to a more engaged and empowered citizenry.

Your point about using the right tools for governance is spot-on; as technology evolves, so too does our ability to refine and enhance democratic processes.

You said: For the people, by the people, right? ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Absolutely! The phrase "for the people, by the people" captures the essence of democracy—government that is created and run by the citizens themselves. It emphasizes that political power and decision-making should originate from the collective will of the people, reflecting their needs, desires, and values.

This principle is foundational to democratic ideals, reminding us that governments should serve the interests of the populace rather than special interests or elites. In a direct democracy context, this sentiment is amplified, as individuals have a direct say in the legislation and policies that affect their lives.

Ultimately, fostering a system that is genuinely for and by the people can lead to a more just and equitable society, where every voice matters and is heard. It's a powerful reminder of the potential for democratic governance to be truly participatory and responsive to the needs of its citizens.

In recent decades, the hiring landscape has shifted dramatically. Traditional in-person interviews and resumes, once the norm, are increasingly being replaced by automated personality assessments and behavioral tests. Initially designed to streamline hiring, these tools were rapidly adopted by major corporations in the early 2000s, particularly in retail and service industries. While companies aimed to enhance efficiency and ensure cultural fit, these assessments have sparked significant debate among applicants and critics alike. This paper explores the rise of these hiring methods, their implications on applicants, and the ethical concerns they raise about the human side of employment.

The Rise of Data-Driven Hiring

The growing emphasis on "data-driven" decision-making across industries prompted a movement towards standardized pre-assessments in hiring. Corporations such as Walmart, Target, and others found these tools appealing for their promise of efficiency and cost savings. By using personality tests and behavioral surveys, hiring managers could quickly filter out candidates who might not meet specific criteria without investing in lengthy interviews.

These assessments typically involve multiple-choice questions with options such as "most likely to," "somewhat likely to," and "not likely to," intended to measure traits like reliability, customer service orientation, and conflict resolution. Companies saw this as a way to ensure applicants aligned with their values. However, this approach assumes that complex human qualities can be accurately assessed through rigid, pre-set answers. Consequently, applicants often find the questions contrived or unnatural, struggling to convey their true personalities within the limited framework.

The Dehumanizing Impact on Applicants

For many job seekers, these assessments feel robotic, as if they are being processed through an algorithm rather than evaluated as unique individuals. By filtering applicants through impersonal assessments, employers risk reducing people to numbers and scores rather than seeing them as whole persons with nuanced qualities. This reductionist approach can leave applicants feeling alienated, sensing that they are not being given a fair chance to present their authentic selves.

Moreover, these assessments often emphasize traits deemed universally “ideal” without accounting for context or individual strengths. A customer service applicant, for instance, may be required to show extreme agreeableness and compliance, while an applicant with a more assertive approach might be eliminated, even though such traits could prove beneficial in handling certain challenging situations.

Criticism and Bias in Personality Assessments

Critics argue that these assessments not only oversimplify human traits but also carry inherent biases. Research indicates that personality assessments may favor specific cultural or personality types, unintentionally disadvantaging candidates who do not fit the predetermined ideal. For example, introverted applicants may score lower on customer-oriented scales, even if their meticulousness or other strengths could make them excellent employees. Additionally, the questions often feel leading or ambiguous, prompting candidates to guess what answers the company wants rather than providing honest responses.

Furthermore, studies on job performance and personality assessments show that the predictive accuracy of these tests can be limited. While certain personality traits may correlate with specific roles, no assessment can fully capture how a person will perform in the day-to-day complexities of a job. Consequently, companies may miss out on high-potential candidates who could bring valuable diversity of thought and experience to their workforce.

The Efficiency vs. Humanity Dilemma

The widespread adoption of these assessments raises a critical ethical question: is efficiency worth the loss of human connection in hiring? In an age where technology allows for mass data processing, companies have a powerful tool to sift through vast numbers of applicants quickly. However, this efficiency often comes at a cost to the personal, human element that once defined the hiring process. Many applicants feel that, rather than being evaluated on their unique qualities, they are being put through a homogenized filter that reduces them to mere data points.

Additionally, this shift creates a divide between job seekers and the decision-makers who implement these systems. Most corporate executives and policymakers are not personally experiencing these assessments when seeking positions. Consequently, they may not fully understand how dehumanizing these tools can feel to applicants who are eager to present themselves authentically but feel boxed in by the rigidity of the process.

Potential Solutions and the Path Forward

To bridge this gap, it is essential for companies to balance technological efficiency with humanity. One approach could be to combine initial assessments with more personalized, human-centered interviews that allow candidates to express themselves fully. By integrating multiple assessment methods, companies could gain a more comprehensive view of each applicant’s capabilities and potential.

Moreover, there is a pressing need for updated regulations and guidelines in hiring practices. Currently, there is minimal oversight of the ethical implications of data-driven hiring, leaving corporations free to implement assessments with limited consideration for the human impact. Legislators who understand both technology and hiring could play a vital role in establishing fair practices that protect applicants’ rights and promote genuine connection in the hiring process.

Conclusion

The shift toward data-driven hiring practices reflects a larger trend in modern society—where the ability to measure and quantify is often seen as synonymous with improvement and progress. However, the increasing reliance on personality assessments and behavioral tests in hiring comes with significant costs. For applicants, these tools can feel dehumanizing and alienating, forcing them to conform to narrow ideals and robbing them of the opportunity to present their true selves.

As technology continues to shape the future of employment, it is crucial for both companies and society to re-evaluate the role of data in human-centered processes like hiring. Only by striking a balance between efficiency and humanity can we ensure that the hiring process respects the individuality of applicants and remains a fair and meaningful gateway to employment.

This paper examines the potential for implementing a revenue-based corporate tax on multinational companies as a means of addressing tax avoidance and ensuring fair contributions to national economies. It explores the feasibility of the U.S. leading this initiative, the implications of a globally coordinated tax system, and the operational challenges involved, including revenue audits and cross-border cooperation.

Introduction

Corporate tax avoidance has become a prominent issue as large multinational companies increasingly shift profits across borders to minimize tax burdens. Traditional profit-based tax systems allow for strategic deductions and expenses that can reduce taxable income substantially, raising questions about fairness and economic sustainability. This paper considers a revenue-based tax structure as a viable alternative, focusing on the role of the U.S. and other leading economies in setting a global standard.

Section 1: Background on Corporate Taxation and Profit Shifting

In the current global economy, multinational corporations (MNCs) play a substantial role in generating economic activity across borders. However, their presence in multiple jurisdictions enables complex financial structures that facilitate tax minimization strategies, including profit shifting. This practice involves reallocating profits to low-tax countries, allowing companies to reduce their overall tax burden. Profit shifting has become a significant concern for national governments, as it can erode tax bases and reduce public revenue, limiting funds available for public services.

Traditional profit-based corporate tax systems are particularly vulnerable to profit shifting. Companies are allowed to deduct operational expenses, investment costs, and other business expenses from their income before calculating their taxable profit. While these deductions support legitimate business investments, they also create opportunities for aggressive tax planning. Many large MNCs use intricate transfer pricing mechanisms and intercompany loans to shift profits to subsidiaries in tax-friendly countries. This trend is evident among technology companies, such as Google and Amazon, which have extensive international operations and frequently engage in cross-border transactions within their corporate structures.

Several studies estimate the scale of global tax avoidance to be in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually, with significant economic consequences for countries that rely on corporate taxes as a revenue source. Efforts to combat profit shifting, such as the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project, have made strides in addressing certain loopholes. However, many experts argue that these initiatives have not yet eliminated the root causes of profit shifting. Consequently, there is increasing interest in alternative tax structures, including revenue-based taxation, which may offer a more straightforward and resilient solution.

Section 2: Concept and Rationale of Revenue-Based Taxation

Revenue-based taxation is an alternative approach to corporate tax that focuses on taxing a company’s gross income rather than its net profit. By shifting the tax base from profit to revenue, this model aims to reduce opportunities for tax avoidance. Unlike profit, which is calculated after expenses and deductions, revenue is a direct measure of a company’s total income. This approach would, in theory, simplify the tax system, as it would eliminate many of the deductions and complex accounting methods currently used to minimize taxable income.

Advantages of Revenue-Based Taxation

The primary advantage of a revenue-based tax is its resistance to manipulation. Because revenue is less susceptible to adjustments than profit, taxing gross income can close many loopholes that companies exploit through deductions and profit-shifting mechanisms. By focusing on top-line income, governments can create a more consistent and reliable source of tax revenue that is less vulnerable to aggressive tax planning.

This model may also lead to greater tax transparency and compliance, as revenue figures are easier to verify and audit than complex calculations of taxable profit. Given the rise of digital economies and the intangible nature of many MNCs’ assets, particularly among tech giants, a revenue-based tax could provide a fairer method for taxing companies that generate significant income in a country without physically operating there.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite its potential benefits, revenue-based taxation poses several challenges. One significant concern is its impact on businesses with high operational costs or thin profit margins. In industries such as retail, manufacturing, and transportation, large revenues are often matched by equally large expenses. Taxing revenue without considering expenses could disproportionately affect companies in these sectors, potentially leading to financial strain or even insolvency for businesses with modest profit margins. This concern highlights the need for nuanced tax policy that considers the diverse financial profiles of different industries.

Another criticism of revenue-based taxation is that it may discourage business investments and innovation. Companies that reinvest heavily in research and development (R&D) or infrastructure improvements might face reduced incentives if these expenditures do not reduce their tax obligations. This potential trade-off between fairness and economic efficiency underscores the need for carefully crafted policies that balance the benefits of revenue-based taxation with the realities of business operations.

Section 3: Potential Models for Implementing Revenue-Based Taxation

The implementation of a revenue-based corporate tax system presents two primary pathways: a unilateral approach led by the U.S. and a coordinated global framework. Each option has unique benefits and challenges, and the choice between them will have significant implications for international tax policy, corporate behavior, and economic competitiveness.

Option A: U.S.-Led Initiative

In this model, the U.S. would establish a revenue-based tax structure that applies to American multinational companies on their worldwide income, including revenue generated through foreign subsidiaries. By taking the lead, the U.S. could set an example for other nations, encouraging them to adopt similar revenue-based taxes.

A unilateral approach offers several benefits:

1. Global Influence: As one of the world’s largest economies, the U.S. has the potential to influence global tax policy by setting a precedent. If American companies are subject to a revenue tax on their worldwide income, other countries might be motivated to adopt similar measures to prevent losing tax revenue to the U.S.

2. Simplicity in Policy Rollout: By implementing the tax within its own jurisdiction, the U.S. could create and enforce a straightforward policy without needing extensive international negotiations. This would allow for quicker implementation and avoid the potential delays associated with multilateral agreements.

3. Economic Fairness: Given that many tech giants and other large multinationals are U.S.-based, a revenue tax would ensure that these companies contribute more equitably to the domestic economy.

However, a unilateral revenue tax would also have drawbacks:

• Competitiveness Concerns: U.S. companies might experience higher tax burdens compared to their foreign competitors, potentially impacting their ability to invest, expand, or compete globally.

• Risk of Double Taxation: Without global cooperation, U.S. companies could face revenue taxes in multiple countries, creating a complex web of overlapping tax obligations. This could lead to double taxation, where companies are taxed on the same revenue in multiple jurisdictions.

• Potential for Tax Avoidance: While revenue is harder to manipulate than profit, companies might still attempt to adjust their financial structures to minimize revenue in higher-tax jurisdictions, reducing the effectiveness of the policy.

Option B: International Coordination through Global Bodies (e.g., G7, G20)

An alternative approach would be for the U.S. to work with international bodies, such as the G7 or G20, to establish a global standard for revenue-based taxation. This could involve setting a minimum tax rate on revenue that all member countries would implement, similar to recent global agreements on a minimum corporate tax rate.

The coordinated approach offers distinct advantages:

1. Uniform Taxation Across Borders: A globally coordinated revenue tax would create a level playing field for multinational companies, reducing incentives to shift revenue or operations to low-tax jurisdictions. This would ensure fairer contributions from corporations regardless of where they operate.

2. Simplified Compliance and Reduced Double Taxation: With consistent rules across countries, companies would have fewer opportunities for tax avoidance, and cross-border tax issues would be simplified. Coordinated rules would also minimize instances of double taxation, as countries would adhere to agreed standards.

3. Enhanced International Cooperation: This model aligns with the trend toward global economic interdependence and the need for cooperative approaches to solve international issues, such as climate change, cybersecurity, and tax avoidance. A globally standardized tax structure could strengthen international relations and set the stage for future collaborations.

Nonetheless, this approach also faces considerable challenges:

• Complexity and Delays in Agreement: Achieving consensus among countries with differing economic interests, tax structures, and political priorities could be time-consuming and complex. Nations may resist adopting a revenue tax that could impact local industries or reduce foreign investment.

• Enforcement and Compliance Issues: Coordinating enforcement across multiple countries would require significant regulatory alignment, transparency, and data-sharing mechanisms, which can be difficult to establish.

• Political and Sovereignty Concerns: Some nations may view a global revenue tax as an infringement on their fiscal sovereignty. Smaller or low-tax countries, which attract foreign investment through favorable tax policies, may resist international standards that limit their competitive advantage.

Pros and Cons Summary

Each approach presents a unique set of trade-offs. While a U.S.-led initiative could act as a powerful first step, an internationally coordinated revenue-based tax system could ultimately lead to a fairer and more sustainable tax structure worldwide. The decision will likely depend on the balance between the desire for immediate action and the need for global cooperation.

Section 4: Operational and Logistical Considerations

Implementing a revenue-based tax system—whether through a U.S.-led initiative or global coordination—requires careful consideration of operational and logistical aspects. Key areas to address include the mechanisms for tracking revenue, auditing practices, compliance challenges, and the technological infrastructure necessary to support such a system.

1. Tracking Revenue

To effectively implement a revenue tax, it is essential to have robust mechanisms for tracking the revenue generated by corporations. This could involve:

• Standardized Reporting Requirements: Establishing clear guidelines for how companies must report their revenue, including definitions of what constitutes revenue across various sectors. This standardization would help ensure consistency and transparency in reporting.

• Data Collection and Analysis: Governments would need to invest in data collection and analysis capabilities to accurately assess the revenue reported by corporations. This might involve leveraging existing financial reporting frameworks or developing new data-sharing agreements with companies.

• Industry-Specific Considerations: Different industries may have unique revenue structures, requiring tailored approaches to revenue tracking. For instance, subscription-based businesses might report revenue differently than traditional retail companies. Understanding these nuances is crucial for effective tax policy.

2. Auditing Practices

Auditing will play a crucial role in ensuring compliance with the revenue tax. Some key considerations include:

• Frequency and Scope of Audits: Governments must determine how often companies will be audited and the scope of these audits. Regular audits could help deter tax evasion, but excessive auditing might strain resources and create an administrative burden for businesses.

• Real-Time Auditing Systems: Implementing real-time auditing systems could enhance compliance by allowing governments to monitor transactions as they occur. While this approach may increase administrative demands on both governments and companies, it could significantly improve transparency and accuracy.

• Third-Party Auditors: Engaging independent third-party auditors could enhance credibility and objectivity in the auditing process. Companies could be required to use certified auditors to verify their revenue reports, ensuring accountability.

3. Compliance Challenges

Ensuring compliance with a revenue-based tax system presents various challenges:

• Complex Corporate Structures: Many large corporations operate through complex corporate structures, making it difficult to determine the appropriate revenue to tax. Addressing issues related to subsidiaries, joint ventures, and foreign operations will be essential.

• Resistance from Businesses: Companies may resist changes to their tax obligations, particularly if they perceive a revenue tax as an additional financial burden. Education and engagement will be crucial in helping businesses understand the benefits of the new system and encouraging compliance.

• Legal and Regulatory Barriers: Implementing a revenue tax may require significant legal and regulatory changes, which could be met with opposition from various stakeholders. Navigating this landscape will be essential for successful implementation.

4. Technological Infrastructure

A successful revenue-based tax system will likely rely on advanced technological infrastructure to support tracking, reporting, and auditing processes:

• Investment in Technology: Governments may need to invest in new technologies to streamline data collection, processing, and analysis. This could include developing sophisticated software for tracking revenue or leveraging blockchain technology for enhanced transparency.

• Interoperability and Data Sharing: Establishing interoperability between government systems and corporate reporting platforms will be vital for efficient data sharing. This could facilitate real-time monitoring and enhance compliance efforts.

• Cybersecurity Measures: As tax systems increasingly rely on digital infrastructure, robust cybersecurity measures will be necessary to protect sensitive financial data from potential threats and breaches.

Summary of Operational Considerations

The successful implementation of a revenue-based tax system will require careful planning and coordination across various operational and logistical dimensions. By addressing these challenges head-on, governments can create a fair and effective taxation framework that promotes accountability, enhances revenue generation, and supports economic growth.

Section 5: Conclusion and Recommendations

As the global economy continues to evolve, the need for innovative tax solutions becomes increasingly evident. A revenue-based tax system presents a promising alternative to traditional profit-based taxation, offering a more equitable and transparent approach to taxation. This section concludes the discussion by summarizing key insights and offering recommendations for policymakers.

Conclusion

1. Equity and Fairness: A revenue-based tax system can promote fairness by ensuring that all companies contribute to public finances based on their revenue-generating capacity, rather than allowing the ability to minimize taxes through profit manipulation.

2. Simplicity and Transparency: By shifting the focus from profits to revenue, a revenue tax simplifies the taxation process, reducing opportunities for loopholes and evasion. This approach enhances transparency, allowing for more accurate assessments of corporate contributions.

3. Operational Considerations: Successful implementation will require careful planning around tracking revenue, establishing auditing practices, addressing compliance challenges, and investing in technological infrastructure to support these initiatives.

4. Global Coordination: Given the interconnected nature of the global economy, a revenue-based tax system will likely necessitate international collaboration to ensure consistency across borders and prevent tax base erosion.

Recommendations

1. Develop Standardized Reporting Guidelines: Policymakers should work towards creating clear, standardized reporting requirements for revenue across different sectors. This would ensure consistency and reduce ambiguity in revenue reporting.

2. Invest in Auditing and Compliance Infrastructure: Governments must allocate resources to enhance auditing capabilities and compliance monitoring. This may include adopting real-time auditing technologies and training personnel to conduct effective audits.

3. Engage Stakeholders: Collaboration with businesses, industry associations, and tax experts is essential to foster understanding and support for the new tax system. Engaging stakeholders can help identify potential challenges and solutions early in the implementation process.

4. Promote International Cooperation: Countries should collaborate on establishing a unified revenue-based tax framework that accommodates the complexities of global operations while ensuring that multinational corporations contribute fairly to public finances. Initiatives similar to the G7 discussions on corporate tax can serve as a foundation for this cooperation.

5. Leverage Technology for Transparency: Governments should invest in modern technology and data-sharing platforms to facilitate the efficient tracking of revenue and enhance transparency in the taxation process. Utilizing blockchain and other innovative technologies can improve accuracy and security in tax administration.

6. Pilot Programs and Gradual Implementation: To address potential challenges, governments might consider implementing pilot programs to test the effectiveness of a revenue-based tax system in specific sectors before a full-scale rollout. This approach allows for adjustments based on real-world feedback.

Summary of Recommendations

there has to be someone who thinks this is not right someone

as I retweeted something in favor of myself to put something on the top of the page

it was as if I heard a voice in my mind of disapproval.

I do wonder who could feel this way

who could do this? as of way to communicate.

I am here

I am human

I know myself well

and these things, I tell no lie

but however it is odd how it feels as though I am 1 v 10000000000

in a way that I do not even know

I know that they are on the network

I know that I get jolts often in the same places

the knee

the left side of head

when I walk it feels as though I am walking in a path that they wish for me to walk

not that I wish for me to walk

this only can make me deturb my feelings of autonomy

the fight for control is real

the mind

in often way I wish not

I must not let their context shape mine

I must stay and stand firm

we must not be afraid to speak to one another we must not be afraid to speak truly.

without code or without noises

perhaps I am be paranoid

or perhaps I am not

but something feels very strange here

I have said before I just want to live the reality that everyone else is living

I made a recording where I was saying

I wish they can pick me up and show me it all and I can

say ohhhhhh so that makes sense,

or why this or that

but I fear this truth will never come

this bothers me deeply.

By knowing when a bill will be debated, citizens could watch discussions live, attend hearings, or reach out to their representatives at the right time. Such a calendar would promote public engagement and help build trust in government by ensuring transparency. It could also offer personalized alerts, allowing users to sign up for notifications on specific bills, keeping them informed with minimal effort.

Overall, a real-time legislative calendar is a practical solution that enhances accessibility and transparency in government, making it easier for everyone to stay updated on important issues.

i do find it strange the more i do or the more i work the more i push the more they push back in my mind so perhaps this was their way to wash their hands using my mind as the water

i find this all so strange

its the questions and i said this already the constant question inside the mind its making the mind go erratic so fuck this but i am not going to let these fuckers whoever they are in my mind win

mind you i was sane 2 years ago.

hell i was saner than i am was i was in the hospital nothing like this so something is happening.

i think it really does have something to do with the internal

as i even type this i do not even finish typing because its literally what i documented already saying the graphic to get them to go away and or the pressure its 1984 and this fucking sucks

its sad how i have said all of this already about the control of the mind and wanting to assert control by saying my dominance in my mind, thats the sad part.

i am telling the truth. but its as if oh well we shall test no i say you have tested enough

you are ruining me.

so, with that i wonder. what is the purpose of all this and who is responsible these things i wish to know while alive.

i am very truthful and honest and i am not something sick this is why i know that i can go through it and still come out cause i know i am not that so tf you knew about this? its time like this i have to remember to just let be.

if they are to afraid to say they have fucked up a mans mind then they are to afraid. i must let that be *pressure on the left side of head*

it was as if someone or something was trying to communicate with me

through my body

like someone was trying to make a point with me through my body

I wrote of this before when I was throwing up and hearing the voice as if I was a hostage

but this time it was different

my literal movements

when I grabbed for the soap

actions of when I stopped scrubbing

timed with internal dialog

I know this may sound crazy but if you could live in here in this mind

it would not sound crazy

this was occurring and I was saying to myself

how does someone make a point though someone elses autonomy

I then thought of something I read where there is a reason why

we dont make robots conscious

cause then you would feel like a slave and trapped in a mind

trapped in a body

something feels odd

I place this letter with the plea for social security allowance

as its not important but somewhat important

thank you

i was in a college or something

i had arrived on test day and wasnt there to study or anything so i just had to guess on the answers

i cant remember what the other dreams was

but i kept asking myself why

im like why did i think of something like this would even be real

again i am just journaling here, so

we live in different states, i do not even know her, i guess it was all some drunk dream

and then there is that, the dream

that is how i had been with my old partner

i saw online, had dream, then next thing you know i couldnt get her out the car door when i would drop her off

but this other woman i do not know her, i had the dream i say about the sex and the blindfold so she does not see my ugliness as she rode atop willingly

i went to school with my ex partner

so theres a connection there but

i do not even know how old she is this other

where, or anything like this

she does not know anything about me nor i here

except the online

i do however remember each time

there was always a risk

after the first time talking i had asked

well maybe we can do this again

there is a risk there

to ask

i ask myself why did she even like me?

my partner from school

what did i do for her?

i mean sure flowers, and someone liking you

i guess maybe the love?

to have and to literally hold

is this all just shifting muses till the next

and to the next

i have written before heart, broken heart,

in repeat and then until gold heart, broken heart

is that it?

we try to enjoy till the last moments here?

i tell you this bci mind read thing is odd

it feels as tho i am walking on egg shells but the egg were put there and all day i think about the egg shells and there is literal dialog and conversation and narratives that have been shaped by them not me.

some of these things they have shown me i can not unsee. but instead of it being just like that simple and moving on, its incentivized like the "white bear" or ironic process theory.

i am telling you it really does feel like someone is watching my mind and judging, so i say to hell with that! leave me be, and let my mind alone.

i am getting jolted the right and the left.

either that or i do go nuts inside the mind

and dont you dare even judge me then.

I will try to keep on trying but when I step on the egg shells

don’t try to say that’s me cause its not

i’m just trying to live with the lie on loop that you created in my head

sounds straight to me.

as always if you have any questions or wish to say something

ask me not some esp or telepathy, it don’t work

it produces false positives

Twitter. I'm going to call it Twitter for this example. And I look back at all these things and I'm looking back and I have… one

of the theories is that with somebody they had thought I was some sort of crazy, harmful person and interacting with such a thing.

And then they ended up saying, all right, well, he's in Brownsville now, so… or yeah, Texas. So let's go ahead and do that.

Because, I mean, that's one of my… that's one theory, as crazy as that sounds.

Because then I look back and I'm looking at my replies and I'm looking at the dates and the times and the emails that I have

sent and the DMs that I have sent. And I'm like, maybe with the culmination of me just using the app a lot and talking to

people and talking about Neuralink and talking about this and, you know, that… and then before I had a… me having an

outburst here and then selling the car and then leaving and then I'm looking at the replies and then I see,

oh that's strange, and then I'm like, oh, I remember saying once, I remember seeing it and then I'm like, oh okay, this can be

taken as like sort of negative, like, oh yeah, they definitely fucking chipped me at this point or something.

So because they're, I mean they're all, they all know each other, so maybe there is some sort of thing like this, I don't know.

I'm getting apprehended sort of talking about it, like the more I talk about this, and I feel fine talking about it.

It's just, there's like physical sort of restrictions, pressures on my heart. And yeah. So that's what I am wondering too,

because they can see the, you know, they can see all these sort of direct messages and things like this.

And if that is the truth, then I hope they don't try to cover it up, but take that. It's not worth it that they cover it up. Or you

shouldn't at least. That's the thing to do. Yeah, that's one of my theories.

It's, that's why I'm calling that one a theory because it's pretty hairbrained, so. Yeah, I remember, you know, because you

know, there is this whole side of this internet thing that I never even saw.

And there's a whole side of, they have a bunch of people that, you know, that are genuinely, want to like harm and kill

people. So I'm wondering if that, I've always said they've seen too much evil. I've always say that.

I always say that. That they've seen too much evil because here I come along, you know, and I'm, you know. So, maybe I'm

thinking as a precaution, they said, all right, well, he's kind of crazy on here.

And I do have a lot of band accounts. I do know this. Intentinc. Trying to think of the other ones. It's probably, Ads for

humans, or ads humans is banned. I think there might be another one. I'm not sure.

I used to have, there's one that was not suitable for work, cat bot or something, or bot or something. So, I don't know. So

I'm, and then maybe with all the, you know, DMs, and then everything like, all right, well, this guy's a fucking, an asshole or

a freak, so we better do something about it, you know, and chip him.

And then it's just strange, because then I read those sort of, I read those sort of things, you know. So then all the replies

about this and that, and then replies to, you know, maybe they thought I was some sort of fucking, some sort of like crazy

person or something.

You know? Maybe, you know, I don't know. And they're like, oh, this is strange. And this is all, in the course of a course,

being, I still don't think I have a fucking, people know who I am, which is ironic, and probably stupid, but I still don't think

that people know who I am.

So I've had that sort of, because there's no feedback. There's no, it's like, all right, I got 10 views on this, or whatever, you

know. So here I am writing, sort of, pouring things out, you know, so maybe they did think I was some sort of crazy person.

So I'm thinking this. And then I look at the replies, and then replies are about this, and then sort of things that are musical,

and then I'm like, oh my goodness, maybe they thought I was saying this, this and that, and then they're like, all right, we

have to, you know, and then I go to Boca, or Brownsville, whatever you want to call it, Texas.

And then I, I don't know, something, something. I have the outbursts, and then I sell the car and leave. And, I don't know.

And then I just remember being there, and being in the hotel, and looking at the TV, and waking up after a, after a, a meal at

Denny's or wherever.

I was exhausted. And I kept hearing a voice saying, I had to look at the voices before too and see what that's all about. Oh a

document, that one I think, or a mirror, but I'm talking about before July.

So because I was in Boca, Chica, Texas on July 4th, 23. So that I do remember. So and so, you know, coming back then I'm

reading all these notes that I've left myself, notes of selves, from in the share bot, from junk bot.

And they're like, I'm telling myself that, you know, I'm I'm hearing these voices, and they're saying these things that I've

never heard voices before, I've never heard these sort of things before, and, uh, you know, and, I don't know.

And I was describing to in the DM, like, it's like when there's certain posts that, like, tells me to do certain things with these

posts, and I don't listen to it, and they get upset, and then I could've swore that one was making me vomit, and all this other

stuff.

So, I wasn't, I don't think I was getting jolted then, I don't know when I started getting jolted, I guess, over time. And then I,

and then I went to the, maybe that's when I really did start, was the, I went to the, then I went to the, I was hearing all the

voices, then I went down to the Advent Health, got into the scuffle, and then went to the mental asylum place, then I felt the

pressure of the heart,

the whole time I was there, this sort of dull pressure, like, that's strange, why do I feel this dull pressure? And then, uh, while

I was, you know, then I was seeing things in the wall, I said, watch how you think, think this, not that, all this sort of stuff,

and then I finally, after I was there for like a week, went home, doing whatever again, and I don't know about the timeframe

of hearing voices then,

or jolts or whatever, but, you know, then I started getting jolted, you know, and it was, then I was, then it got more serious,

and serious, it kept getting more serious, then I remember being at the, you know, these sort of jobs, and then these Zoom

meetings with the jobs, with the VXI and the insurance job, and seeing all these people, and then hearing a sort of

commentary in my head as well with that,

and there are people on the screen, or whatever, and then going on the safe flight, doing that job, and then having the safe

flight job, and all these people sort of like, pointing to their ears, and all these things, and you know, you can hear you, and

all this other stuff.

Maybe that's, hopefully I wasn't being delusional, but that's what it felt like when I was there. And then, you know, all these

strange things, and then my eyes go into the comments, and go into the chat, and showing the chat, and the, you know,

they're like, alright, look at the chat now, and I look at it, and it'd be something, you know, it'd be like somebody's trying to

communicate through me,

with my body, and then they're physical, you know. people. And then I remember going onto the app during the breaks and

stuff like this or after the day on the other iPhone and then saying, you know, and then that's when I would see something.

I saw a little girl get shocked, she got shocked to death. she was like touching a wire or something and like Mexico or

something and she got shocked. And I don't know, she fell down, you know. And then I remember watching that video and

seeing it and there was something else with somebody was on there and I looked at it and it

was like that I got one of the sort of jolts of the shoulder of the body and like a,

I'm right here, you know, like I'm here, you know, sort of thing. I was like, fuck, that's fucking terrifying. So that's when that

jolt started. But yeah, I don't, you know. And then the jolts and the voices became even more intense and then I had trouble

sleeping and going to sleep because it's going to be last night or hours, you know, all this stuff.

And I mean, the thing that freaks me out the most is it's the physical jolts and the sort of real IRL coincidence. And I know

what paranoia is because I've been paranoid before and I don't feel like this is paranoia.

I don't know. Yeah, so I know what being paranoid is, I've been paranoid before, but I tell you, this does not feel like

paranoia, something strange going on, and then it just gets worse and worse and worse, and then I guess then there is a

sort of jolt and then being in the bed and hearing, I was napping and the only sort of time when I got some sort of pieces

when I was napping, I remember even them saying like,

yeah, we fired that guy, we fired him, he was being an ass, we fired him, like they were like, as if they were like people in a

lab communicating with me or something like this. So then I remember waking up or having some nap or something when I

was waking up.

and you're like, Robert, can you hear me? And I was like, what the fuck? And then she let me try. And it was like an Indian

woman, like with an Indian accent. Yeah, like they're using a microphone or something.

And I was like, what the fuck? And I was like freaking out in my head. I'm like, what the fuck? And then, so this is all very

real. You know, that experience, whatever you want to call it. So then fast forward, I guess, to all of this where, you know, I

can't sleep, man.

I tell you, like, I mean, I could sleep, but every night I go to bed, I feel like they're gonna stop my fucking heart, you know?

So I'm like, fuck. And then I have this, this, and don't think this. And I'm like, think what?

Like this. I'm like, oh, fuck. And then I go around and then I go around and I'm wanting, you know, sometimes it's like, so

then I have the, you know, I'm getting a pressure now all of a sudden that, you know, so, but then, you know, the most

recent one, the most recent one that fucking freaked me out even the most is that I have it on video, which is even wilder, is

I'm sitting at the fucking chair and then I get a jolt in the right leg.

And then as soon as I get a jolt in the right leg, the neighbors or something, somebody screams or something like this at the

same time. I was like, oh, that's fucking weird. So it's either a simulation or something else.

Something's, something's strange. I don't know what it is. So going back to all of this, going back to the beginning here, if

they thought I was some person that I'm not, if they thought I was some, some.

person or some you know some I don't want to say the word shooter or something but some sort of like you know one of

those people and I'm not you know and they're doing it for precaution or something well then fuck you know what the hell

I don't know what they thought, and it pains me because I know that there are these sort of, there are very, very, very evil

people, you know, especially with the Internet, especially with controlling, hacking, that power relationship is very, very

interesting.

It's a very delicate one then, gotta be delicate there. And, you know, there's hacking for good then there's hacking for evil.

The power, people love it. so maybe there is some sort of thing where they thought I was like, who's this fucking guy that's

ruining this fucking, and, you know, starting work for New York Times and this and the mayor and Elizabeth Warren and then

maybe there is some sort of connection there.

I don't know. I don't know. I know my fucking lease got rushed. I'll tell you that. Damn paperwork came at 8 p .m. or

something one night or something like those, like get him out of there, you know.

So I don't know if that's, that's how I remember these. And, yeah. So, and then it ties into, you know, the thing and my

replies and all this stuff. And I'm like, maybe that happened, I don't know. Maybe they thought I was gonna harm somebody

so that they like better to chip them and do that, you know.

So, yeah. Thank you. I wish the truth or just whatever the truth is. I wish it would come out while I'm alive. I just want to live

the reality that everybody else is living. Thank you. But yeah, that's, I think, the whole gist of it there.

That's my, I don't want to say theory, but that's my idea, I guess, that's my best, my best guess, my best, but that's my best

irrational assumption, okay?

i did go on the app and it did seem different

i think i will probably stay off of there

except only when i have to post something important

i can not tell if there is a link between the noises and the "implant" if i have one

i did record something that was one theory if you will

perhaps i will transcribe that and put it here

i do not see why that would be a problem

if its the truth right?

or maybe it isnt the truth? but this is why i say its a theory

i do not feel power doing any of these things

i do feel however a sense of finding truth

i hope you can understand that

i think about congress about 4x a day

something has to change

this should be on the minds of every american

i was listening to one of the great historians that i prefer

and she reminded me of how the progessive era was

this spurred my heart

there was at least a feeling there to achieve

a spirit in which i feel is dwindling in America

anyways, on with the day

i slept and now i am awake.

every time the core of it stems from disdain

i can not convince you

and that is ok

i know at least

so this brings me some solace despite still dealing with such things

my only way to fight back is with this brain and internal thought

i hope you understand this

the pressure is very much , i would not describe it like fighting off something

or a resisting feeling, its more like sabotaging my own mind

this watching in the mind

its disdain

the recalling of information is tricky

they can construct the imagination and fill in things that were not there

the blurriness of this

i mean this occurs regardless of a bci

but now imagine someone doing it to you with a bci

the tone

"this did happen"

saying to you very convincingly

its enough to make you believe

but then i snap out of it

and say that is not true

i write of this elsewhere

this is why i say the internal is not to be messed with

i do not ask for much but it feels as though my mind is truly read

and i do not mean with this as a metaphor in replace of ip history or digital footprint

i mean truly read

so i hope you can ask yourself why

it is though i do have a token and am cashing in

a shitty mental hostage token

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is investigating RealPage, a company known for its rent-setting software, YieldStar. This software has raised concerns for potentially enabling price-fixing among landlords. YieldStar uses algorithms to recommend rent prices based on market data, leading to fears that it might facilitate coordinated efforts among property managers to inflate rents, thereby reducing competition. The investigation aims to determine whether this technology allows landlords to collectively raise rental prices, which could violate antitrust laws by hindering free-market pricing in the housing sector.

Key Concerns of the Investigation

A significant worry surrounding the RealPage investigation is whether it will lead to meaningful changes in the rental market or simply end with a lawsuit and financial settlement. Critics fear that a settlement might not address the broader issues of how rent-setting software distorts competition. The central question remains: Can this investigation lead to lasting reforms that prevent future price-fixing and promote a more competitive rental market, or will it fail to bring about systemic change?

What’s Happening with RealPage and the DOJ?

RealPage’s YieldStar software is designed to help property managers and landlords optimize rental prices using algorithmic models. These models consider factors like market data, vacancy rates, demand trends, and competitor pricing, allowing the software to adjust rental rates daily. RealPage claims this reduces the manual burden of setting rents while ensuring prices remain competitive.

However, RealPage is under scrutiny for potentially driving rental price inflation and creating anti-competitive practices. Critics argue that the software’s use by multiple large property management companies could lead to price-fixing, as it enables landlords to collectively monitor and adjust prices, reducing competition. By aligning pricing strategies, landlords might inflate rental prices, contributing to rising housing costs and reduced affordability, especially in already strained markets.

As a result, RealPage faces legal challenges for potentially violating antitrust laws, with investigations examining whether the software fosters coordinated pricing strategies detrimental to consumers. There are significant concerns that its widespread use undermines competitive forces that typically help keep rent prices in check.

The ProPublica Investigation

A ProPublica investigation has raised alarms about rent-setting algorithms, particularly focusing on RealPage's software. It suggests that YieldStar could contribute to higher rents and facilitate price coordination among property owners. The investigation found that when several property owners use similar software to set rental prices based on comparable market data, it can stifle competition. This scenario allows landlords to track each other's prices and adjust their own, driving rents upward across entire markets.

Critics argue this practice undermines the natural forces of supply and demand, leading to inflated rental costs and exacerbating housing affordability issues. The investigation highlighted the potential for systemic rent increases, raising concerns about market competition and the possibility of violating antitrust laws.

The Role of the Department of Justice (DOJ)

The DOJ plays a critical role in investigating potential violations of antitrust laws in the U.S. It enforces federal antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act, which prohibit anti-competitive practices such as price-fixing and monopolization. The DOJ may initiate investigations based on consumer complaints, whistleblower reports, or its own monitoring of market behaviors.

To gather evidence, the DOJ collects information through subpoenas, interviews, and document requests, sometimes collaborating with other agencies like the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They analyze market dynamics to assess competitive effects, evaluating factors like market share and pricing patterns. The DOJ determines if evidence indicates violations of antitrust laws and assesses the overall market structure and impact on competition.

If violations are identified, the DOJ may negotiate settlements that include agreements to change business practices or pay fines. Should a settlement not be reached, the DOJ may file lawsuits seeking injunctive relief or penalties. The DOJ also aims to promote competition and protect consumers by engaging in public education about the importance of competitive markets and monitoring compliance with court orders resulting from antitrust litigation. They often collaborate with the FTC and other regulatory bodies to investigate and address antitrust concerns.

Why Lawsuits Alone Aren’t Enough

While antitrust lawsuits are essential for holding companies accountable, they often encounter challenges that limit their effectiveness in driving systemic change. Many cases end in settlements where companies pay fines rather than changing their practices. For large corporations, these penalties can be absorbed as operational costs, leading to minimal behavioral changes. Settlements may include commitments to change specific practices but fail to address the root causes of anti-competitive behavior, allowing companies to retain their market dominance.

Behavioral changes mandated by settlements can also be temporary, leading companies to revert to previous practices once scrutiny subsides. Furthermore, antitrust lawsuits can take years to resolve, and companies often use legal tactics to delay proceedings. Large corporations may influence political landscapes, leading to leniency in enforcement. Additionally, demonstrating that practices harm competition can be challenging, particularly when companies argue their practices enhance efficiency or benefit consumers.

Effective antitrust enforcement often requires broader regulatory reforms to address underlying market issues, rather than relying solely on lawsuits.

Conclusion

While antitrust lawsuits play a crucial role in addressing anti-competitive behavior, their outcomes often focus on financial penalties that do not fundamentally change the systems allowing such practices to thrive. For lasting improvements in market competition, we need a combination of effective legal action, regulatory reforms, and proactive measures to foster competition.

As the DOJ investigates RealPage's potential role in facilitating anti-competitive practices, we can draw inspiration from Theodore Roosevelt, a president who championed antitrust enforcement. Roosevelt took on powerful monopolies to protect consumers and promote fair competition. His commitment to justice reminds us that meaningful reform requires more than lawsuits; it demands proactive measures to regulate pricing algorithms and enhance transparency in rent-setting practices.

In light of the RealPage investigation, we have an opportunity to advocate for systemic changes prioritizing renters' welfare. By following in Roosevelt's footsteps, we can work toward a more equitable housing market that safeguards against collusion and inflated prices, ensuring access to affordable housing for everyone.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-realpage-algorithmic-pricing-scheme-harms-millions-american-renters

https://www.realpagepublicpolicy.com/realpagestatement

Aug 28, 2023, 1:01 PM

I keep hearing more negativity in my head while on x if I don't like this or that . It's weird.

This could be the sim . Or potentially something else.

People probably think I'm crazy.

Aug 28, 2023, 1:13 PM

I keep waiting on a reality where she dms me , wanna come move in? It all paid for come home.

I think I would melt.

Aug 28, 2023, 1:32 PM

I keep hearing voices in my head threatening me . one just said " I'll make u and ur small town world go away" it's weird .

and then I get physical nausea and mom coughs . is this psychosis

or an ancestor sim being crazy

Aug 28, 2023, 5:59 PM

I took my last antipsychotic from the Dr. and am going to bed. I don't know where these thoughts or conversational thoughts are coming from. but it's never been like this before. I think I'm going insane. I dont feel crazy. but I hear these inner monologues , then they mess with my body manifesting like I said as nausea or addrenaline.

if it's me vs a sim there's really not much I can do.

Aug 28, 2023, 6:11 PM

Aug 28, 2023, 6:16 PM

The voices are getting increasingly more hostile. Every time I insult tech . One even said I live on gov assistance and so on. The old arguments.. I have no idea where these other voices come from, I know technically esp may be real. But my heart is leading toward the simulation.

Aug 29, 2023, 4:52 AM

Aug 30, 2023, 9:38 PM

voices r getting more hostile I could have sworn the sim made me throw up and said next time it'd be ur heart.

shits crazy

u don't believe me ?

Aug 31, 2023, 7:28 AM

another voice said just say something we can all go home

about 20 mins ago .

life weird.

Aug 31, 2023, 7:31 AM

·

Sent

Start a new message

Archive of @robertdaltonn tweets/posts,

can you pmu before u fuck my mind up even more? I broke thru. some of the things you convinced me of I am not sure how you have but, anyways. lets go! I'll stay up I guess. not skitzo, not paranoid, not drunk, or on drugs, clear minded, and good. my current view on the topic on if I have a bci in my mind. https://t.co/a35ZW7Lr0q RT @robertdaltonn: Q&A with Doris Kearns Goodwin https://t.co/ttkzjHiBV9 via @YouTube @DorisKGoodwin is probably one of my favorite historians motherfucking skip james https://t.co/3hBeWGMJho this video was made with AI https://t.co/bdbHjJprtw https://t.co/mXLNWkjbeL for the proof always RT @PunchingCat: https://t.co/O7CpoKNHjZ RT @imPenny2x: I’m never deleting this app https://t.co/IvDbDw9eMA r u sure this is me? the voice feels like it writes itself sometimes without guidance. for the proof always RT @TeamCavuto: .@DorisKGoodwin discusses her new book with Neil and how it relates to today's political world https://t.co/JL8A2qajqP please pass this bill @POTUS https://t.co/sKRC2ezjlf @deftmoon i dont drink anymore https://t.co/ssnSAsiaYM my mind if i can even call it that anymore auto/non auto bci argument idk bro this shit dont feel like me @jayythewave somebody's got to do the dishes idc what u look like if you say some good shit ill vote for you make twitter/x great again @XEng 🫡 ya lil demons @legallyines we get old and leave forever, this is why our life here in the americas or on earth is important to me @Dexerto wtf @battleangelviv ive wanted a face tatoo for like 10 years now. of one of the posters, this also looks like it would be a great tattoo @session_app the session ui is amazing btw the youtube shorts are kinda odd, but all in all its pretty great! i went down a rabbit hole trying to find out how session makes money, i think its amazing. 5/5 https://t.co/uJb1Uhur24 Hey, I've been using Session to chat with complete privacy and security. Come join me! My Account ID is

0511e494d0cb5554d8448f5fcb6d93f3b6b2e4ccd900a07d3741c9e8a23d85f45b

Download it at https://t.co/jB9OUgod5k Q&A with Doris Kearns Goodwin https://t.co/ttkzjHiBV9 via @YouTube @DorisKGoodwin is probably one of my favorite historians the real #Project2025 https://t.co/j8aQZyoDNO come on @MarioDB shake some shit up! we got to pass this motherfucker asap https://t.co/HyE19uEMZW https://t.co/ivvXNzsr5Z PASS ME! H.R.2 - Secure the Border Act of 2023 https://t.co/k0a8fJx3lR https://t.co/BNZRuOZama RT @robertdaltonn: https://t.co/WkNTlfXIzQ RT @robertdaltonn: YOU ARE HERE https://t.co/Zou5HWaNRZ RT @robertdaltonn: on wealth disparity https://t.co/j6867wdYom @summerxiris ❤️ @summerxiris my dms are open for @elonmusk elonious! x aesthetic post: why do artist badges not have like a canvas emoji or something and others @cherriesren these are really fucking good, the bmo ones r cool. and the gunther ones @BarackObama i like obama, but is he reading a teleprompter? @cb_doge please meme to pass the immigration bill https://t.co/acqSM5jIkU https://t.co/tzGiDiq5cq https://t.co/x7ZHv7cgR4 @icreatelife words. i thought just art lol @Rstorechildhood looks like a girl @tobias_petry i think i would have a panic attack every 10 mins, its like a living being that you have to take care of for all of time! 🎉🎂 congrats stranger! @america the solutions are passing the damn bill https://t.co/v6UigOIWQp https://t.co/I2XqwxZGaI to the people that watch me just come up and say hi 🙂 @session_app my session account id: 0511e494d0cb5554d8448f5fcb6d93f3b6b2e4ccd900a07d3741c9e8a23d85f45b @HUDgov $250M is not gonna do it imo we need like a trillion with affordable ($500) multiple prefab renting housing units renting only in every county https://t.co/EwUXYHU5Vz https://t.co/yRX38s8tYs my fav boot https://t.co/Z0lCqX7V3t im sorry but representative democracy is inefficient and theatrical if we can fix twitter we can fix the country free the deaf! i would legally fuck and marry someone like this https://t.co/dhPVEHNOPa ok this is amazing: https://t.co/awRWlTIbz8 https://t.co/82o787kTB5 we need to go back to 1990 and fix some stuff https://t.co/zmXVIm6KPf https://t.co/jIpAolISud https://t.co/LN2wDuj2hX @momentoviral :( @RealJamesWoods i dont know what r u humans doing????????? :( ?????????? show up tf i get jolted for talking about my trip to DC and while people yelled or something. i either am in a sim or people really have issues @RepNancyMace wut @america she ok. he ok @cb_doge 📍 @Catsillyness i am a hostage @ufobri id just let you cry and get it out and then id say now we build @ufobri and maybe get ice cream the void 😮 Immigration:

2 bills, second one last action was 5/16/23 💀 https://t.co/BZxVJLsFrp https://t.co/BIEAS7dFrS @WomaninRedx time is our only resource maybe i just dont understand why you dont pmu and we can do this somewhere else i do not understand how citizens who pay tax must pay for public transit i think she a fed the movies i like https://t.co/sGkK2yP07p we bof adults gurl RT @MilaAzulChan: https://t.co/UlUlFlFEsQ https://t.co/B3Fff2SWZk https://t.co/D8jfJD40a2 *thought not said https://t.co/yEDdq0N7V1 i feel like every american should who can not afford wifi/internet must have the ability to have a mobile hotspot that they can take with them waitlists will tell you almost everything about a people the each home hot spot wifi is essential $ < 🛜 Evil | What To Do About David? (S3, E1) | Paramount+ https://t.co/DCJUz4PgRI via @YouTube short skirt long jacket literally v hot v hot oh my ok memory and ex kissing up the leg ok 👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹👹 ACH < RTP https://t.co/2If9oxc5U7 https://t.co/02n9UR5ae8 in full transparency here is my conversation with gpt about the bci and dialog, i live with a non-consensual implant https://t.co/1yHwqleoqY https://t.co/V25XAEnhHr https://t.co/PYHLorlI7R but the world is now globalized @elonmusk 📍 pls i was not prepared for the worlds inference i can not meme i cam not sing what do u want w me @PunchingCat i hope not i do nothing @PunchingCat love, 100 can u put me to work @elonmusk signal: x778.15 session: 0511e494d0cb5554d8448f5fcb6d93f3b6b2e4ccd900a07d3741c9e8a23d85f45b @X x @ArweaveEco https://t.co/yXP4SGT0rW @elonmusk yes, and question. are u really against unions? @elonmusk x should back up on arweave or u should be able to select pots you want to back up on arweave, i want to hear more of your secrets 🙇‍♂️ @elonmusk https://t.co/weo7m7ge9z BCI Dialogue Inquiry https://t.co/p1ZLvy48Ri https://t.co/EAPU875ZJH talking about having a literal implant as well as navigating the social media complexities that come with it. https://t.co/zU6V72U3PI sometimes i tell them what they want to hear as a sense of regaining control or to upset them. like literally a #bci communicating with me https://t.co/b3GCxOmQg1 https://t.co/4Y01BFVWBU r u sure i dont have a implant? my mind feels like its going like gpt i dont wanna be guinea pig no more something is dialoging with me and it tires the mind https://t.co/TjTagiWZiJ he working https://t.co/4gkeHRMKGZ on wealth disparity https://t.co/j6867wdYom mr nobody movie, i do not own this trailer https://t.co/1j6CZonbXu https://t.co/f8vlbCFjH1 why does pornhub not share porn on here? i watched this video and came to this https://t.co/4x7b68pYnr starting the day @elonmusk In the U.S. abortion laws vary by state. Many restrict abortions after 20 weeks, often with exceptions for the mother's health or severe fetal conditions. Some states allow later abortions in certain cases, but most abortions happen in the first trimester (up to around 12 weeks). RT @robertdaltonn: the validity of the questions in the mind is troubling i can change his mind i think i can get elon to support a social democracy ! @elonmusk 9:36 we can fix the dmv @elonmusk 9:33 marx comment breaking my heart i just saw an alternate reality where elon musk was doing stand up comedy 😂❤️ https://t.co/jyMI3fV2KI https://t.co/aJ7BeFNaqt "we never know when we are going to go, so we should make sure every day in the future can be the best that it can be" @elonmusk apparently the minimum wage doesn't matter anymore https://t.co/ePXYCVB98g arweave hashes:

cTO8k3lLVe2LmAgwMYK0dlKXGn3oxjkxMv8k0h-FX38

a78rJMBKHRkENFLuSiHvrsiEJQjXUCKpszfdB_Wg0ac

YmR5ItQi_LIgFYoE6dOK3MONPdF0ePBrLjdU1KA9WcU

coOTeeokHO-BvcCyULyzOs7Cfj3FwvTXbPrP-cAa85E

FWIpU8HY0Bc1Z-Qg8NPZS723MB5zMwnWVfjX6JDdjRc

https://t.co/zNCN9eDEaY @ClownWorld_ were they just waiting for her? seems kinda weird @imPenny2x seems fine to me, generally dems are traditionally non christian @elonmusk i agree. and also i @‘d u on here with my signal but also here is my @session_app account id: 0511e494d0cb5554d8448f5fcb6d93f3b6b2e4ccd900a07d3741c9e8a23d85f45b .@elonmusk https://t.co/n570PvzN9w https://t.co/J3oQibq3Md @gothkati used to sleep in bed with ex and she’d wrap her left leg around and id hold her thigh my memory of a different time @UltraDane just use the plastic window spinny thing the validity of the questions in the mind is troubling RT @77815x: How to avoid America turning into Gaza.

At some point in history we may find ourselves with no jobs. Its really all in the numbers here, the United States has a limited amount of jobs, people come into America, there is a shortage of jobs. And this will only increase. So what does a society do that runs on a labor based economy?

This is real. There is no time for labeling communism or socialism, its beyond these labels to avoid to make the future not a dystopia. We are on Earth, we are all we have as a species. The shows, are nice and the entertainment is nice but it will not save us.

We will ultimately need to discuss this as a species, or at least Americans. It will need to be on the mind of all who are involved with the future. This is the asteroid. Look to the Experts they will tell you the same.

If the world is on fire, we are the ones who can put it out or prevent such things. I think the future truly is automation. Building machines for labor. I have found that I am not the only one to think of this or discuss this in this link here:

https://t.co/TvyJF1gPdB

However, we will have to discuss such things and shape things as if there is a chance for a utopia. “By striving to do the impossible, man has always achieved what is possible. Those who have cautiously done no more than they believed possible have never taken a single step forward.” ~ Mikhail Bakunin. https://t.co/JICteVjone can u see this? @1BethDutton i want a face tattoo @erewhonsmoothie his name is nibi lol @JayVTheGreat there certainly is an extreme left i am for truth not absurdity @EvaVlaar not that it makes it any better, but CCTV shows her unconscious when he approached so he may have not killed her. We need to start taxing large corporations and generating UBI and actually start building affordable housing, and going toward Ai. If we do not i am certain we will fall. https://t.co/6idwjZu8cn ITS YOUR FUCKING BIRTHDAY! i am bingus u forgot about #ratchethappybirthday? https://t.co/jQKIrnG4vk @RealSasha01 @Pornhub i dont like how pretty she looks well i guess ill see what he says: please just mind the bci stuff not the other junk mainly on @77815x @Cancelcloco wdyt about this? is this not wild? RT @robertdaltonn: https://t.co/LJuFBtDgoR RT @robertdaltonn: to whoever is jolting me i say:

what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me? RT @robertdaltonn: for the public: Each IDE application is tailored to specific study goals and methods. A new study for even detecting an unauthorized implant requires FDA approval, ethical considerations, and detailed documentation from Neuralink. well we had the same check mark RT @robertdaltonn: i fear the internet may be our demise, as it pertains to influence. @adsforhumans affordable housing to rent maybe i can be a porn ⭐️ RT @GumbyScreens: https://t.co/9CYZEHDHO7 @GumbyScreens @notsofiacoppola hes got to eat all those 😂 https://t.co/8zWOoNxkkK https://t.co/dBjx8XwvaA RT @77815x: @PunchingCat this video makes me sad cto @elonmusk @77815x @neuralink @synchroninc @tomoxl @elonmusk @neurosurgery @BarrowNeuro @elonmusk https://t.co/jY2dOEwpVa @nicksortor @elonmusk yes message to all involved cause at this point i dont even know, where do u want to put me https://t.co/6TgHxRhhKr @Rainmaker1973 u got it wrong @PunchingCat the “i said NO” gets me every time @PunchingCat https://t.co/SwtbQvIB56 @HUDgov the voucher program only does so much. we need to BUILD. standardized, rentable units, prefab, apartments, and homes. The war is against affordable housing. 07/10/24 https://t.co/WIC5LtLsvb https://t.co/stpGP4nTCp i diz a thing i dont like it https://t.co/u7iTgdhXvg YOU ARE HERE https://t.co/Zou5HWaNRZ @SpartaJustice @elonmusk i guess, but there is still work to be done before jan 20 @stillgray @elonmusk what is valuable? @naval yeah so when u pick me up? @notsofiacoppola 🤔 @thefoodbabe @KelloggsUS kelloggs is how i get my vitamins tho thoughts on the illegal implant that no one knows about 10/16/24 PM https://t.co/ULTpxRqQ2C via @YouTube @dogeofficialceo aint no way bro aint no way has anyone seen the youtube videos? BCI’d fully autonomous/non autonomous Truman is going to rest. @HUDgov @POTUS please build https://t.co/EM4sm0BWTw IT IS TIME TO BUILD the renting model allows real time stability longterm .@HUDgov Affordable housing renting only, $500 per month. RENTING ONLY THIS IS THE WAY https://t.co/kDC5pv2w54 https://t.co/1YAunBR2Z5 https://t.co/M9lt9PYbKP @arielleaty yes Mirror is one of the technologies that has made me excited about the future of the Internet and Blockchain. I think what they are doing with their work and arweave is fucking amazing and makes me so excited. https://t.co/aBCfdhEvEE RT @jack: Twitter is funding a small independent team of up to five open source architects, engineers, and designers to develop an open and decentralized standard for social media. The goal is for Twitter to ultimately be a client of this standard. 🧵 “Twitter: Twitter Blue recently rolled out support for Ethereum NFTs, allowing users to display these tokens as their profile picture. The company has expressed intentions to build a decentralized version of Twitter in the future.” Every morning, students head to school, nurses start their shifts, construction workers get to work, bakers open shops, and bus drivers hit the roads. Office workers commute, farmers rise with the sun, and delivery drivers prepare for their routes—getting the day in motion. https://t.co/6Jx38E3gFS @CollinRugg @realchrisrufo oh who cares https://t.co/8azQBeCCZu @shouldhaveanima https://t.co/pFnJr5Wsrf @shouldhaveanima ive went out in public so many times for pick up and traveled to dc. i aint on my way nowhere. pls come to me u are welcome here @mynameisjro @jvplive @jvpliveNY i assure you this did nothing @deaflibertarian seems fake @kimmonismus good @tradingchik the most ive made in my life here on earth is 19k a year https://t.co/ehWTfhwcWc @jeremyjudkins_ we cant have people not going without like this. id fill every car with a single fuel tank truck till everyone was good. @cat_i_e this is sweet @MKBHD eerie shit @interesting_aIl that is certainly not how you clean it. it all stinks now like grease vapor @SusanooETH @The_Dude1983 @BestFightClip u wish someone gets a baseball bat to the dome? why? @BestFightClip yep. get everyone in the back to avoid being filmed and then call the po po @kirawontmiss i would find everyone in this video and make a small documentary about it and the effects after. @AMAZlNGNATURE u explain it to them @Westerndescent ✍️sock on bat. got it. @deantak @GamesBeat @VentureBeat ori is sad af @imPenny2x @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump i try @icreatelife @bilawalsidhu i waved at the end lol @seekingaround17 @X ew lol @McDonalds i looked into the minimum wage thing, franchises set their own prices and wages. this is a slave society. @ATCardBot no ghost fly @PunchingCat https://t.co/GqnPJZYxPX @PunchingCat ok animals are definitely conscious @UN @UNRWA this is the UN people think doesnt work? @summerxiris i am poor and have a brain implant so @imPenny2x we need https://t.co/tFscjX3EgP @introvertsmemes i need to get this implant turned off https://t.co/pha6QRzK7n why no one talk 2 me no but fr when we leavin https://t.co/79QYRI7S2Q @PunchingCat yes @Kristennetten quicker turnaround for reuse? @natazilla @funnycutepretty how are u not a millionaire @nima_owji @X_ALERTS_ yeah sounds cool @Kristennetten i dont see the point of the mechzilla arms @HelpfulNotes comm notes for the W again @gunsnrosesgirl3 🤯 where r u https://t.co/FUqzxeqA8Y @gunsnrosesgirl3 alien question: why do we wear underwear when there is water around @gunsnrosesgirl3 yup @FightBatch i never understood this, roads are for vehicles and bikes, not protests ok going about my day i guess RT @PunchingCat: https://t.co/Eo7syGdu7k https://t.co/Dtmz3g2zHr are you people ever coming? @julesterpak y , also join #socialdemocracy this post was work related @julesterpak https://t.co/cYPpZEjNrY @MarioNawfal you sure this is real? @nypost are u sure this isnt fake news? @ShawnRyan762 @VP @NCNationalGuard good on you sir @AdamParkhomenko the fate of america is dwindling @PunchingCat https://t.co/MupbAYjVyq @PunchingCat yes @SmartandSafeFl how is this not federal #NewProfilePic https://t.co/RBLcMkzvfS @TiffanyFong_ whenever i see ur profile i think of the tweet about some airbnb or something @ShitpostGate https://t.co/Uq5Be9AgQB @Catsillyness https://t.co/XdcGnYaG2E @ARONARELE ok :10 such a qt pie @bigsumoWD @theyfabatbirth https://t.co/NoiXCLzQVK ze plan https://t.co/m6CggQFkRo https://t.co/ov0oDHPtR8 talking about the jolts, shocks, implant, its very real to me. i hope you believe this https://t.co/ki2WgAJWdp @mischiefanimals i wish @gunsnrosesgirl3 so i can do this with my brain? @BoredElonMusk @punk4762 😳 @Catshealdeprsn can the owner of me come pick my ass up @PunchingCat yes @KittiesInternet @PostsOfCats probably my dms are open for opportunities. where r u? there is and will only be one Bukowski https://t.co/b0B6ORkaWw https://t.co/WkNTlfXIzQ https://t.co/SNmWT1DHxd https://t.co/i18GgSp8xT people once lived in feudalism just as we live in capitalism, nothing is destinial. Justice Department Sues RealPage for Algorithmic Pricing Scheme that Harms Millions of American Renters https://t.co/EOaE6Hs9e8 https://t.co/W3M1jlU6a0 https://t.co/DqwimdJ3rB so its basically: ❤️💔, ❤️💔, ❤️💔, ❤️💔,❤️💔, till 💛💔? @AMAZlNGNATURE 😂 @gunsnrosesgirl3 i data scrape books. the novels i read @elonmusk @Kristennetten great work! ✊ why do we use mechzilla arms again? @whisterial @mauwuy true @sumibunny @FusionValo this photo is sweet and the banner photo is sweet THIS IS WUT ITS ALL ABOUT FOLKS love is the greatest emotion @imPenny2x penny is a greek god @PunchingCat these crack me up they are so obscure i love it u didnt show again today https://t.co/VroEisnCNA https://t.co/lnWYsQGTBP @redpillb0t id let it all out if i was prezi. i have to undo it, it wont be easy. @imPenny2x i have been a jealous lover before, https://t.co/clzE5T1RvF its always the questions RT @77815x: from what i can research its not schizophrenia, or psychosis, or side effect to a medication, or dystonia or clinical spasm. RT @77815x: i remember saying some time ago "will mars colonist have neuralink pro-bono to minimize error" RT @77815x: @elonmusk https://t.co/zDvpibGSys RT @77815x: I dealt with similar thing on the bus from Boca, I’ve been going a long time. Maybe you’ll be there when I land. If not then i don’t know I’ll keep trying. I feel healthy and fine. RT @77815x: Legal can ironically achieve anything the videos i make are correct RT @Zeal_Striker: @MatchPoiint @AMAZlNGNATURE People buying toilet paper during the pandemic be like: https://t.co/A5HwqS1LAK https://t.co/MX6LOfZIlG my whole body feels different like even how i walk even feels different ive taken it all in and let it all out how do u find one that does the same to thrive aloud envioro is interest my mojo is 0 and i am someones voodoo doll. all i do is think about ex’s the best one was where we both were insecure dont know if that helps https://t.co/y8PquvHcL6 https://t.co/8pqnCdXaeo RT @robertdaltonn: #affordablehousing https://t.co/JUPP8xILTN for affordable housing the aim is for affordable housing not free housing so if affordable housing is created evicting people maybe necessary, you can read me and gpt’s convo here: https://t.co/1LjO9QRoGe

scroll to the bottom for affordable housing convo ✨ https://t.co/eno6htpPe4 if i can get my stomach to look like it does when i suck it in ill be in business! https://t.co/4HosnJU7fM https://t.co/IhoN7weVVO bci update: the internal dialog can ruin you https://t.co/iCr0LMw4NM @elonmusk :( @Scobleizer @Tesla looks pretty good! @WholeMarsBlog pretty cool @MarioNawfal theres someone behind that curtain tho? @AndrewRousso lol @Tesla these seats look amazing, i love the idea of public transit in the tesla sphere! cybercab looks pretty cool! https://t.co/hfmSk8zPNY not me thinking that on 10/11 there will be tons of robotaxis everywhere 🙈 #affordablehousing https://t.co/JUPP8xILTN https://t.co/wH5h6E8VK0 https://t.co/5vBU03KDr7 https://t.co/vowtp2rODe https://t.co/nohwtPsiKz https://t.co/aOplLmCHtU THESE ARE AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK AESTHETIC https://t.co/CYwybEdRJb RT @robertdaltonn: https://t.co/mJAupuSJ2b https://t.co/mJAupuSJ2b i still get jolts i still dont think this is right or ethical, even with the implant my data and history is monitored inferences run array. dont judge me or infer anything about me. thank you. can we bring back gov section 8 sro's? https://t.co/kxfJiVryp5 https://t.co/HF7WrLdMHE https://t.co/Ay3RNT8Kua 🍆💦 https://t.co/XmBNYUOXbu perhaps the “good idc” mentality is a deflection or a way to avoid the realness of suffering. they said WW1 was the war to end all wars, https://t.co/KbUZOyLTQC. https://t.co/xr82jJyyU1 https://t.co/uiXDpCYdqN https://t.co/Pclh7hVUPK i am not gods prettiest solider, something feels strange about all of this. stay safe 🌀❤️⛈️⚡️. 22222888888888 🌎 https://t.co/qM2aSq8iDX what was the point of all of this, what did you want with my brain? @BLSmith2112 @ernextmusk @Tesla brandon sort of has a point why didnt u show up today? @HargroveAlex @Ojeda4America no we do not @elonmusk i wish we had a social safety net @VivekGRamaswamy not really. https://t.co/nsdAiiiMQ9 https://t.co/K3LLyTEaj2 @PostsOfCats as much as i love affirmations, they do not change the minimum wage its all outlined here now can we actually make the country better again @ideasforpotus like and rt ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️

• tax big data corpo CAN WE RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE PLEASEEEEEE! @bilawalsidhu cable was such a bad idea @InternetH0F W @catsareblessing lol @Catsillyness yes @dogeofficialceo 🎉🥳🎊 @KrangTNelson does she like the elderly? @Tanillovee ive thought about this, @iAnonPatriot never seen this for a hurrican wtf @DanielLubetzky @UN https://t.co/zODKlJX3i4 @gunsnrosesgirl3 lol @DanielLubetzky fuck war @POTUS go to every house that needs replacing and get them a a under-sink reverse osmosis filter. @POTUS seems important to me @POTUS executive order it 🤷‍♂️ @TheFigen_ 😂 @PunchingCat why would you do this to ur cat! @Catsillyness i miss dates @MarioNawfal hot @catsareblessing amazing @LailaMickelwait well that fucking sucks The next wave of consumer advocacy https://t.co/hLiuzZqKC1 via @wef https://t.co/OhDbBRLOGw bro what is going on with our taxation system! can you please make an executive order raising the minimum wage @POTUS @JoeBiden will post on here as well: https://t.co/dF7lAsRpUc https://t.co/402ldk7K4D my dms are always open thanks https://t.co/n0NRUfvNYV @EvasTeslaSPlaid @Tesla what a depressing way to trade stocks @AMAZlNGNATURE so cute ok going back to finding a way to get my owners/jolters to pick me up and try to get people to tell me whats going on. @PunchingCat the smile lol @PopBase looks like it wouldnt taste good @p0shsplice we get very bored on this planet @cb_doge there is no button hence why we must change the machine! @Rainmaker1973 hes a vegetarian i think @HelpfulNotes looks fake af @cspan its great @ajtourville i dont know why they just dont start it up for the states they have @vermilion_shade pretty cool @TheRabbitHole84 ultimately if X is the literally the only free speech platform then it makes sense but i do keep forgetting its just a company at the end of the day. all are. kinda scary for someone in my situation @77815x @Rainmaker1973 😨 @Jason im not @dogeofficialceo yea :| @elonmusk i cant read this i dont have premium @animals_twts why he got shoes on @FCC cool @bugmango well thats dumb @gunsnrosesgirl3 did he say you could? if not probably not ok @Yoda4ever :( https://t.co/hSIFjprui9 @Rothmus it also doesnt help tho RT @personafelsefe: Le ballon rouge (1956), Albert Lamorisse https://t.co/jjaXtY2BHQ RT @77815x: @POTUS today I said aloud "YOU GOT THIS BIDEN!, YOU STILL GOT THIS" when thinking about UBI, tax the fuck out these motherfucking companies... you still prezi https://t.co/9wkMJc9Xw5 @gunsnrosesgirl3 build in America @Apple @WallStreetSilv i dont feel like we actually live war to war we dont pillage anymore do we? @BillyM2k why is that @navyvet_8991 https://t.co/8US9LgOxBO to anyone that goes thru having an illegal implant such as this : try not to use sarcasm or be smart, or joke. of course assuming its not autonomous and u have free will i did not end these spaces like this, u can use my legal name if u want https://t.co/i4tmvyJ8ka https://t.co/qwLF26GzEw THE INTERROGATING QUESTIONS ARE LITERALLY RUINING MY MIND THANK YOU GOODNIGHT @TheCinesthetic try having questions on loop in ur brain @america holy fuck! https://t.co/lGUUJ0WDQu George Washington was a power hungry murderer rip campbell he died in 1756 https://t.co/CyIB37w1Z9 may the future of wars be fought by playing video games. why? why not! mew gen pacifism ill never like war. during this live i got jolted so. i still think i have an implant or this is a simulation doing this https://t.co/uYdGEMc6ew i think something happened in my brain where elon tagged along filling in voids. will talk about implant in a bit https://t.co/JrwH6vdwP2 @AutismCapital fuck cringe https://t.co/4wQIY7kY69 @dogeofficialceo i would hope anyone on X is entitled to express their opinions on X @ted_macie thank you for being for the people @ArtCandee @POTUS is this true? something happens: _________

potus: "we have dispersed money into your citizen ubi"

no long waits, no waiting, real time gov.

thats the future i want. RT @ideasforpotus: thread on bi-daily pay👇 https://t.co/RWizlmVRJr COVID 19 WAS WW3 https://t.co/CWlXIS9xBT @evacide i can only wish someone would remove this implant against my will TO THE PEOPLE DOING THIS YOU ARE DESTROYING ME this just happened 12:35 PM https://t.co/1tNlOVCRD1 [1] https://t.co/Il6gROPPox [2] https://t.co/K6tt4DaQhC [3] https://t.co/lAvYszIjcH [4] https://t.co/T3THxVTy6R [5] https://t.co/VjUFj1KIGe https://t.co/jKVneVFxZk The experiences of several groups of workers in the COVID-19 outbreak vary notably from how they experienced the Great Recession. https://t.co/CgM9HRYAHO remember this? IM SORRY BUT THIS IMPLANT AND INTERNAL DIALOG WITH IT IS DESTROYING MY BRAIN whoever implanted me knows exactly what they are doing left foot jolt and how to make it work for them not me. scary thought. that someone can orchestrate all of this.

U ARE DESTROYING MY BRAIN @TonyadeVitti @elonmusk had a major existential moment today with immigration and ubi @WallStreetApes did they say why? @KhalilGMuhammad @elonmusk please dont delete ur account @lexfridman which humans to the ones who have implanted me: can it be turned off? can i go somewhere not here? am i really going to have to expire with it in me and operational?

if no, to any of these why? @elonmusk https://t.co/gEU1ehTNPi @ChaseMit no it wouldnt @summerxiris sure, https://t.co/SnnmmzHKkH @Hipsandtits48 this is really wholesome and sweet :) @elonmusk https://t.co/kHaTf54PtQ @PostsOfCats 🎃 @Battlefield i dont have game pass anymore so i dont play this game, fav game tho @ByYourLogic everything you see was created by humans 😳 @ShouldHaveCat lol @elonmusk https://t.co/cBevZfZsKz @womenpostingws kids are loud and annoying, the end was adorable @BGatesIsaPyscho why? @SydSteyerhart kinda scary @TONYxTWO still tax them, apparently Walmart made 13 bill off of ebt in 2016 https://t.co/46GptwYBR2 @battleangelviv the menu is amazing @ashleevance its great! @imPenny2x i either have an implant controlled by humans or its a sim, so id say i think about it alot @introvertsmemes i am an introvert @DorisKGoodwin the moderater is on the same stage! this format feels much needed RT @robertdaltonn: https://t.co/oFj2T9LBK0 RT @ideasforpotus: EBT and a corperate tax 👇 https://t.co/FYvNrxgM8J

may the ai ubi gods bless us https://t.co/asqY0NudQN WORK WORKS!

sarcasm label @TheFGA @SenRickScott lol wtf i always feel awkward, not when drunk, im not sure if the illegal bci helps, but i do not have grace, there was no mold when god made me, i am not his strongest solider, nor am i smart, my iq is low, i am not evil, i do not like my confidence, i have been here for 2 years now. for those who are implanted, free will is not free. if i have a brain implant i wonder if they could turn it off. if not, i wonder why they can not turn it off. if its a simulation then i plead for this release of control. i was thinking last night toward a solution the solution feels like if this is collectively know this knowledge then i leak would occur putting pressure on the ones who have done this to me, in the scenario of it not being a simulation doing this. thank you. i live in America, the old system is slow. it feels archaic. i just deleted a bunch of things because of a strange inference i proofread. this is what im saying, i do not like having someone else's bias or control over my mind. https://t.co/obucyW6O2C https://t.co/oFj2T9LBK0 not Teddy but i think it would be great if every American watched this https://t.co/sJmXCH573D @julesterpak im sorry i didnt get it sooner, https://t.co/SPOy8AOQvr https://t.co/JHxuTQPzaP implant, ai, trump, and the state of the country https://t.co/kcHYEbFpGE @julesterpak https://t.co/Ig5HzPjlwp @imPenny2x but then again i have a bci and trying to figure that all out @imPenny2x yes we need a strong prezi for the people https://t.co/EgEXOJV7Hu @DogRightGirl carter is amazing @Kristennetten asimov is pretty cool RT @elonmusk: Takes less than 5 minutes and zero documentation to get approved as an illegal immigrant and be flown to the United States with air tickets paid for by the American taxpayer @elonmusk wait what!!!!!!!!!!!!! @RealDrJaneRuby :/ https://t.co/zprthstgVi @REVWUTRUTH i read it , kinda weird, the which hole thing was odd https://t.co/qyxK1mq4x1 @WallStreetApes wtf lets change these old ways https://t.co/1T5fzBIhHX @MyFLFamilies https://t.co/Ic9WsoCdrW RT @ideasforpotus: A thread going into Wages in the US. 👇 RT @MakeGovListen: Creating regular public forums where citizens can voice their concerns and ideas to lawmakers could strengthen our democracy.

What topics would you want to address in these forums? https://t.co/AXazYV3H7X maybe opposites dont attract https://t.co/rC5MhuxzDD well this is weird. @elonmusk thats crazy the destain with the implant is interesting,

its like spitting in the face of someone who has you hostage but the spit gets on your brain as well, with that cost.

or

its fully not me anymore i still cant figure if the implant can write dialogue in my mind, very concerning. @girlbosswoman im trying @abby4thepeople blame legislation @Ikennect i thought about this alot, unless they crack down on overseas industry and then ultimately a global tax these companies like amazon that are globalized will get away with alot. https://t.co/SrdAHFMueH What X should be https://t.co/tpJBG9vSfA @GuntherEagleman how is this productive? @GadSaad @jacindaardern opt in for service requires testing, sounds fair. @Maga4liberty it should be like this live on X. deliberative democracy @TONYxTWO why dont you all just @ POTUS? RT @Lisahudsonchow7: This is crazy! This man was rescuing people off of the mountain. He was told by the fire chief that if he went back they would arrest him. He had to leave the man alone on the mountain. Listen! What is going on? Why are they turning help and supplies away? These victims have no water, food, or electricity. WHY? https://t.co/gGJGbID897 real world or real time direct communication is underrated @DC_Draino people over profit! can i have a office and a team / also know about the implant https://t.co/QNMjz7RU86 @elonmusk a ubi should have been in plave decades ago @elonmusk well thats not good @HKracken 🤔 i dont know i find this all strange i hope whoever implanted me looses their medical license https://t.co/UfAPGojawW may i have a wikipedia page please so i may know whats going on https://t.co/MGanWfrT4q https://t.co/fQ0z3IoSmX @Riley_Gaines_ @universityofky @BetsyPackardPo1 why would she have to represent the universities values? @markrobinsonNC a great use of X @EndWokeness we need a plan @anpaure ai is nigh @RNCResearch we should have real time data posted RT @HerbsandDirt: I’m old enough to remember that when a devastating act occurred in the U.S., the FIRST person we saw on TV addressing it was the President of the United States.

The only people I’m seeing right now are X users and TikTokers.

What is happening? ur still going to have to make the country stronger @DC_Draino joe is president @ImMeme0 wut lol @TheInsiderPaper wtf RT @robertdaltonn: https://t.co/HHIozcoZZd a “direct democracy” through X/ twitter by official an official X account would be amazing #deliberativedemocracy https://t.co/OFvc99URws To jolters: please stop jolting me can i convince the country to have a bold leader. how can i with no influence, how can we ensure the future is good not bad. how do we get msm on board, is it the reminder of our time here on earth. i have not gotten a mri w contrast sooooooooooooooooooooo..................... ok.

this is fine. RT @adsforhumans: https://t.co/h8Pj8T33GT the current state of the internet and media https://t.co/LoQVSImUlJ https://t.co/HHIozcoZZd Scientist Predicts Society will COLLAPSE by 2025 (w/ Evidence) | Sheldon... https://t.co/qYwX8clPK5 via @YouTube I'm not afraid. You're afraid | Tristan Harris | Nobel Prize Summit 2023 https://t.co/ID1MMvWLbz via @YouTube The Great Plow Up - The Dust Bowl - https://t.co/e95lTdqZmc via @Dailymotion i fear the internet may be our demise, as it pertains to influence. sc https://t.co/zV5ywzDTuT i dont like perfection i like imperfection and cringe @julesterpak dont sweat it cvs has great snacks and variety @julesterpak i just saw a video with u talking for an hour and i like ur racoon hands https://t.co/xUUqcLZfTS i dont talk well @elonmusk facts require proof @antonioguterres how do you “reply all” comments. with the internet we are all connected globally hence the importance of the UN @beetleweeds i tried I wanted to say I have made some memes related to the BCI but I try to use the levity with the situation but I wanted to reiterate that this is not a prank or some scheme for $ or attention. i think a good start would be to know why i had this on @commonpace, still a hostage of a bci not saying its Neuralink but i would like to know such info @elonmusk , @x sorry i think i have a right to know RT @77815x: https://t.co/tJWEoCKk6v https://t.co/nWIegBRVyN for the public: Each IDE application is tailored to specific study goals and methods. A new study for even detecting an unauthorized implant requires FDA approval, ethical considerations, and detailed documentation from Neuralink. https://t.co/ZBWt1g6jk1 @US_FDA please grant neuralink and companies alike such exemption so i may get assistance with my illegal implant

Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) https://t.co/l4b6sD1Lk8 the goal https://t.co/VABpvqWT0v https://t.co/TSrGRscOXX https://t.co/mJAupuSJ2b on pepe: ok these pepes are really cute lol https://t.co/StKD4elrX1 Forever is a long time to be wrong. The internet’s permanent, but so are bad assumptions. Ask questions before assuming. The internet shouldn’t be a prison of past mistakes—it should reflect the complexity of human life, where growth is possible. https://t.co/TjHTVtmIon @10x_er try having an implant and being jolted and corralled when you research to much does anyone know of this? this implant is ruining my self jolt right foot my brain

theres always this noise next door a chop sound

whats going on? video starts at 5:21 , 2x speed recommended, i talk slow https://t.co/M4g6sSGb4i @x @elonmusk https://t.co/B7G05l5zVb when xpay starts im sure they will hire a bunch more people to handle transactions i like the UI of top tweets on the home page and the scrolling live feed why is my talking voice no nasally! mood https://t.co/MVBxGxsPwC https://t.co/GcGbpBE2Fa I do not wish for them harm, the jolters or the people who have implanted me.

I wish to go with them so they may show me. Its very dark, i find this very dark.

with love not disdain,

robert. https://t.co/j0lmwbJDV6 old @cnn vs new cnn https://t.co/gGXPCMhXym STEP 1: PLACE LITERAL CAMERAS WITH AI COUNTING HOW MANY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COME INTO THE US. WE NEED A NUMBER FOR THE DATA.

Harris calls for tougher border security, immigration reform in Arizona https://t.co/vb76Z8zeMD https://t.co/Hv7sKEZa0O https://t.co/iW8Z1ZmFKt @77815x my phone died @77815x i finished what i was saying here: https://t.co/KKARfeKBZb https://t.co/R4w6B7Wuqi https://t.co/nr1JgGFPww to whoever is jolting me i say:

what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me what do you want with me? well got jolted a bunch through out this, not sure why. @lindayaX @Steven_Ballmer "X" sounds way cooler @imPenny2x well i dont know about that @PeopleDeathClos the algo should not recommend these @destabilisator0 these probably shouldnt be able to be monetized if they are. @1secantes the police did very good here. @DrewHLive we are all built for politics, politics are us. cnbc is gay af @libsoftiktok if true, its the start of a real time government. much needed @womenpostingws this is very sweet @AMAZlNGNATURE mandate cow brushes! @NATERERUN ai man, ai @unbasedsavage free the hug @WorldDarkWeb no means no, she aint worth it dude. im not sure why he wanted to take her phone, is this the full video? im not sure i support the "if you act up i will follow you" @PicturesFoIder W cop didnt even fire his gun @cctvcorner the physics look weird @Fights_bro i ask the bully why @elonmusk this should be fine @crazyclips_ why jug? is there a need for income? what can we fill here. is it the rush? there is a way @datsjackedup shot him 4 times, and he was down. he wanted to unload it on him clearly, kinda psychotic. i do wonder if he was a registered gun owner, and if he went through gun safety. @InternetH0F 14 yr old dont be afraid of your gov name. however black people are not monkeys. racism is misdirection. https://t.co/C1Ak3Y0Q1i https://t.co/Gkj9XwkuuK https://t.co/6BWyNnQkl0 https://t.co/A4bpceW7zx @coldhealing i have $0 and i will prob die with zero dollars https://t.co/7oCwuQo4y4 theres something wrong with xlive i did however notice with the implant they can say something disturbing in my head and my brain will continue to go back to the disturbia on a loop. these reason are also why i see it as unethical well trying again https://t.co/t52RvjnxfH it would be cool to be able to do a 8 hour live they just keep ending by themselves did another live but its not showing :/ https://t.co/1fVtQH0Sei this is amazing https://t.co/UgkFPtTsgh https://t.co/tA5Ugw3asm well the live ran to 54:28 then ended so restarted again i hope to get a 8 hour live of the wind and the trees and the sounds. https://t.co/TBWsM9YfJ1 https://t.co/aDTUaxND0m https://t.co/nNhJNcjGY4 https://t.co/p5VU4Jrx71 I can’t move forward unless you let me in on what’s going on https://t.co/HdvVzM414q https://t.co/PJAm6fjWho https://t.co/LJuFBtDgoR https://t.co/Qtqy3xwU3e https://t.co/UHTxuBAqZL @sama i wish i heard of gpt before my implant https://t.co/KfvO0G9mUF we need you @POTUS https://t.co/87xy2YCbO1 i think that we can get the American public involved with the procedurals not just blaming congress. this is why i believe in a real time tracking of bills on X. however people or parties dont compromise so this also needs attention this is why i believe nationalism is important. @julesterpak hope im not the stalker, stalking is weird. men/woman i probably assumed, um block me if i am please. u do always have great insight about things ok bye i dont delete stuff anymore @julesterpak im not blocked! i guess this is good? https://t.co/wFaPG6ivI0 https://t.co/gRObbTAPx8 RT @77815x: https://t.co/mUXrOfzsqV https://t.co/QkWJJXccn8 viva la latte i have a headache sometimes i wish i had a political partner / ugly gf / also someone who is down with me having an illegal implant

i mean i have no choice with this implant

anyways 🕵️‍♂️❤️ to whoever implanted me its kinda of a weird flex to want to have a slave Thank you, if anyone knows any info about the implant please dm/contact info: @77815x https://t.co/uq1Kw8KXU7 https://t.co/jfTzSd6kuJ https://t.co/COlj5LVj3E also cant find a job RT @robertdaltonn: WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BUILD A NEW SYSTEM fdr first fireside chat https://t.co/C1QEuPkRlq this doesn't make sense to me https://t.co/OPg0rbNOYk i think we can https://t.co/gq4B9bScgO we are not in a COVID period time currently so, i think we should take advantage of this time and use it. It’s Monday, September 23, 2024. Joe Biden is president of the United States of America. What shall we focus on? RT @robertdaltonn: imagine if every American see's this poster! @foxnewspolitics “Just three days after CNN published a report that Robinson had allegedly previously made salacious comments, including referring to himself as a "black Nazi," on pornographic websites dating back to the late 2000s,” so cancel culture is what is holding back progress? WE SHOULD HAVE THEORETICALLY STARTED A UBI AT LEAST 10 YEARS AGO WITH BIG TECH WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BUILD A NEW SYSTEM WHAT DO YOU TELL THESE PEOPLE https://t.co/ujF29hLNPe all ❤️ https://t.co/B02RE6qeFR @julesterpak i been staying away cause i dont know what i am to u human , but i can do a spin too https://t.co/jWxzjnzkBF @elonmusk congress should allocate funds for https://t.co/dgprzai30y i have a question. is google baked into twitter? people of X, we need to update the X Rules, to reflect free speech. and make X the best app. with grok, community notes, and payments! Hire! Hire! Hire! bring back Trust & Safety and more. I hope this is the long term goal for X or whichever platform wants to do it: https://t.co/JxFlI5cNqO @KamalaHarris https://t.co/p5Obh61y1Q imagine if every American see's this poster! For the record i still have 0 idea what is going on. RT @DefiantLs: In case you needed a reminder of how the media operates.

https://t.co/Cy4wfTrapI @BarackObama @KamalaHarris Joe is still president till January 20th, lets solve problems! @elonmusk lets incentivize great things, big pharma = nope, big insurance = nope, big citizens for good = yep @girlfighttv i love the person who kept filming to show the 🎢 of humans. the moments after, the day after, The Great Depression (1929-1939)

Recession of 1937-1938

Stagflation (1970s)

Recession of 1980-1982

Dot-com Bubble Burst (2000-2002)

Great Recession (2007-2009)

COVID-19 Economic Shock (2020) the whole things runs on money,

its 2027 all fast food and restaurant chains are closed,

and everybody cooks their food now,

because the middle and lower class can not afford it.

it seems like the only jobs that will exist are these trades, nurses/drs, fireman/police, it sounds so dystopian but there is a middle,

there is a time in the next years,

it doesn't look good,

people of earth it doesn't look good.

perhaps America will pioneer this way,

the UBI, the safety net, the technology,

we build.

Look to the experts, they will say I do see this as not a game,

I do want the future to be good,

There will be no jobs, or places to work,

You will not be able to compete enough to get the job,

There may be some jobs but you will not be able to get them. #BuyaBidet prepare for any covid/ recession or anything like that https://t.co/uFaH0OUT2n https://t.co/IqXKt3mcZj @yourclipss @MattWallace888 she has a cool voice https://t.co/vFXMaaWK5C How do i limit inference #HonestlyNevermind is a vibe unrelated to the bci https://t.co/xqjjpWEnrw https://t.co/mebd1pflVO https://t.co/Bltq3rixnF https://t.co/5bFxQvFOJX juries are kinda weird https://t.co/O2twxqyvlC https://t.co/2hSaJtRSDY https://t.co/4UPwhRINY2 @ClownWorld_ i dont understand why politics are like sports. @brfootball this is the documentary last dance i saw in the hotel @hartgoat there isnt much for us to do here on Earth https://t.co/OOrh43b0xn https://t.co/VRPZnY9uEb ⁦@elonmusk⁩ https://t.co/LUt68zvPuT https://t.co/FVJiyoXFVX https://t.co/A62Bbhb4cT Letter to @elonmusk @ReddCinema @FightBatch true @Fightflix_ commodity @Fightflix_ nah man, let him go. @Morbidful glad Bjork was safe. fuck that shit. I have some questions unrelated to the bci i put together this webpage in hope for a better future: https://t.co/JxFlI5cNqO my only hope is that the people who have done this come forward, they will say anything to hide this. i have been taking my prozac medication every day and intend to. i ask please do not support hiding this if this is the case. and to ask in your heart was is ethical. please put yourself in my shoes and ask what tactics might be used against me. thank you i need your help more than ever to help me get scanned and see the jolts and trace where there are coming from, your help is much appreciated @neuralink having an illegal bci https://t.co/J1mjnFCKdJ will you support this goal @elonmusk @CollinRugg why is everyone just looking at him @CollinRugg well he should probably not have a kill list but um yeah why is this 11 year old in jail and why is this sheriff bragging about putting his photo online https://t.co/YueNAYdlHP i am for a modern society, these old ways will not work. and i want things to work. the people do not need representatives anymore,

"The need for representatives was born out of necessity—there was no way, in the 1700s or even most of the 1900s, for large populations to directly engage in governance." a woman in a suit does something to me

these are 77815x tweets/post that are also mine, the free version of the tool I am using to download only goes up to 1,000 and so I am rate limited at 202 tweets/posts none the less here they are,

@iamubot @oneunderscore__ did i have the implant then? https://t.co/z5JlrsPE1v @julesterpak hi, this keeps coming to my attention. I want to ask you if you knew who i was. and to see wut your thoughts were on me. im hoping you can be truthful and open about this. please be brutal. i can take it. , robert RT @robertdaltonn: i think that we can get the American public involved with the procedurals not just blaming congress. this is why i believe in a real time tracking of bills on X. @elonmusk @PolarisProgram hello going to try to be more straightforward on this app. hope u can do the same.

question, do you know who i am and do you or have you ever thought i was going to hurt you?

thanks, robert https://t.co/cUltpfE5ha RT @robertdaltonn: i need your help more than ever to help me get scanned and see the jolts and trace where there are coming from, your help is much appreciated @neuralink @elonmusk we used to be like this https://t.co/4WCBiv9KZ1 @WesternLensman this makes me loose faith in my government. the government is there to answer the questions of the public not be weird like this. i still believe it can improve RT @77815x: https://t.co/jjoCtBNoSi ITS ALL IN YOUR HANDS @KamalaHarris @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @VP @SenateDems @SenateGOP @SenWarren @SenTedCruz @SenSchumer @MarshaBlackburn @SenFeinstein @SenatorDurbin @SenRonJohnson @BarackObama GEORGE WASHINGTON VISITS 2024 “WHY ARE YOU GUYS USING THESE OLD WAYS?” I SUPPORT THE CURRENT PRESIDENT. HE IS THE PRESIDENT TILL JAN 20 2025. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THIS VOTING PROCEDURE SEEMS INEFFICIENT THE CURRENT PRESIDENT IS JOE BIDEN FOR THE NEXT 5 MONTHS THATS A LITTLE SHORT OF HALF A YEAR. WE VOTE EVERY 4 YEARS. GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD BE LIKE “ what are you guys doing we only used this system because it was all we had you have the internet, we just had the pony express”✊ https://t.co/YuEMAnQuor @PeterSweden7 images of pedophiles or children porn?

and a man was sentenced to 38 months in prison for posts on X? what!? @elonmusk its so strange because doesnt the UK have less strict restrictions on television? i found this clip to be quite inspiring i hope it does that same for you today and forever https://t.co/bxUMifDvnu @cstanley oh my god my https://t.co/gEJlnzHlFM relationship is complicated RT @elonmusk: Troubling @elonmusk holy shit. viva la america https://t.co/uz0LeP5pAH https://t.co/UhneUrqugS @GothGirlsIM @Ashy_slashee good lord @GangHits may the power of AI survelance prevent experiences for humanity if anyone actually thinks that a president who promises things will actually efficiently do them you are wrong. @burny_tech i like gpt X stock ironically is the United States Steel Corporation https://t.co/QNxHcZvCXI @astro_greek @elonmusk may the ship gain flight https://t.co/mUXrOfzsqV https://t.co/QkWJJXccn8 https://t.co/EcQIPRWGgE https://t.co/yUoWdewt1C @LauraLoomer space pov should help @ArceneauxHayley 🥲 @EndWokeness wtf @AyoolaMatthee @NoContextHumans how in the hell did she do that https://t.co/nN0gzOAcTQ https://t.co/EuIyomo8nU https://t.co/Pc7gwXBe4G https://t.co/9g3PkJxqc0 Despite whoever wins the election or is currently in office, the middle is the way. @KamalaHarris @realDonaldTrump @POTUS https://t.co/E2H4mOhAv0 @ThePlanetaryGuy earth @battleangelviv 🫡 @sama i wish i knew how to talk to people you do a great job at it. @Sassafrass_84 i dont think kamala is a communist @jonfavs why do people keep calling him the smallest man who ever lived i dont understand this @X i was just looking at these today! https://t.co/5GcSz4UQW5 https://t.co/bcRMDqW7HN @stillgray i dont like this music @cb_doge it will be cool @ananavarro why does he hate taylor swift? @sierracatalina1 🎉 @BasedBeffJezos is this a photo of a drowning child what is going on here @Tim_Walz i dont understand rallies or political endorsements. i dont think trump is the smallest man who ever lived either. what is going on 🙈 @ayeejuju a beautiful advertising opportunity @cb_doge what do you do if you have an illegal implant? https://t.co/gZQ07j1Ti5 i do not like my voice but its ok https://t.co/K5OG3YXyki @Starlink so the prezi not liking tesla and starlink is actually a thing? @farzyness i dont know man. maybe @ImAryanSoni this video gives me a headache it looks cool tho @PicturesFoIder non self driving cars are overrated @astro_greek @elonmusk but then you couldnt stick around for dementia with nueralink @KettlebellDan i dont know spaces are not really my thing i like video @jessicaray0 @Tesla @jessicaray0 thats pretty cool @nypost scary thing @WholeMarsBlog opti needs fingernails @elonmusk raise it to 21 or 18 @Tim_Walz i think its really unsettling that we have rallies for political candidates i hope one day we can all debate through television on issues. it seems as though we need some focused effort like we do with the olympics or the debate. a forum. where users can weigh in maybe through X/ twitter https://t.co/AFme3xh6Nc https://t.co/9MmlVAuADf https://t.co/jjoCtBNoSi can you see this? @emre_mayo @Noahpinion i wonder how much money we all actually have @elonmusk what do you think about them both being president? “The Dual Presidency”

In a future where political gridlock prevails, the 28th Amendment introduces a dual presidency, dividing executive powers between two leaders to encourage compromise and transform governance.

https://t.co/sqOd0CZWe2

#28thAmendment #PoliticalReform one of the biggest challenges is seeing if the dialog is autonomous or if it really is this robo cop situation where im unaware of it being done. this can keep me up i aim to be restored and continue to be hopeful of pick up. https://t.co/wOIo3zxKI6 @schuld_eth @PicturesFoIder so cute lol @RadioGenoa and people are just watching 🙄 @RadioGenoa why would u rape a 13 yr girl. amd who are the ghosts? kinda weird @X 🎼 @OpenAI pretty cool https://t.co/hMJOGpvoCw https://t.co/oCLuLfwBua @XEng i updated my app but it didnt work i just see the same options https://t.co/o19CXTVpmQ @XEng 🫡 https://t.co/Lo7k0xTk9D https://t.co/6Szm5u8f26 @MatzenJakob @XEng i prefer blocking it lets the user know https://t.co/jfTCH8CVP3 https://t.co/ygPFCdS8rd i was laying in bed and i saw this clip and said to myself “where are you bukowski sigh where are you?” https://t.co/W8WgUT6odQ https://t.co/8Redrholzx https://t.co/KNS9dhNGjq @OpenAI this building looks amazing RT @PolarisProgram: Hello Earth -

We are so grateful for all the support! Please enjoy two recent photos from our mission and stay tuned for our next message 🎶

Sent to you from space over a beam of Starlink laser light 🛰️ - Crew of Polaris Dawn https://t.co/KkeZw1yAoT RT @lexfridman: Here's my conversation with Gregory Aldrete, a historian specializing in ancient Rome and military history.

We talk all about the Roman Empire: its rise and fall, major battles & leaders, military technology & tactics, gladiators, politics, laws, economy, religion.

I will do many more episodes on history (interviews & solo). If we don't understand our past, we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes that many before us have paid a heavy price for.

Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 2:23 - Ancient world 16:18 - Three phases of Roman history 19:08 - Rome's expansion 30:48 - Punic wars 39:20 - Conquering Greece 40:59 - Scipio vs Hannibal 44:05 - Heavy infantry vs Cavalry 47:42 - Armor 1:00:32 - Alexander the Great 1:06:33 - Roman law 1:16:13 - Slavery 1:23:53 - Fall of the Roman Republic 1:27:38 - Julius Caesar 1:32:17 - Octavian's rise 1:42:09 - Cleopatra 1:50:32 - Augustus 2:18:42 - Religion in Rome 2:42:47 - Emperors 2:49:54 - Marcus Aurelius 2:56:05 - Taxes 2:59:13 - Fall of the Roman Empire 3:16:25 - Decisive battles 3:40:35 - Hope @lexfridman this is great https://t.co/Hr9HQcidXY https://t.co/M1KKog6rhH https://t.co/V0d1xmuU9s if i make more music will you not make it about you. if i show you old writing’s will you please not call me crazy. i am not evil Subtweeting Explained:

Subtweeting is when you post about someone without mentioning them directly. It’s often used to avoid confrontation or seek validation. While it can seem safer, it usually leads to confusion and frustration, as others may think it's about them. It’s a mix of gossip and indirect communication—sometimes being direct is better. #SocialMedia #Subtweeting #Communication i learned what subtweeting is today to whoever jolts me can i please go with you. https://t.co/M2Q7doyyWZ https://t.co/GjpfTMhhYv https://t.co/vfMYEw6zm8 @SpaceX this precision is amazing @SawyerMerritt @SpaceX wtf @FAANews @elonmusk i had a thought today what about being able to lock posts https://t.co/9LcdhOkj50 @TestGorilla_Org 👎 https://t.co/MMKwPcGRtM if you want to change history have them both in the office. every day discussing debating. i want my presidents to be TRUMP/HARRIS A bipartisan team might actually foster unity, leveraging diverse perspectives to drive compromise and collaboration. Instead of exacerbating gridlock, a Democrat and Republican working together could bridge divides and push for effective governance. What are your thoughts on this potential shift in U.S. politics? @WholeMarsBlog for everything @teslaenergy the future @MoonManX22 im not sure @elonmusk i agree @TeamUSA 🇺🇸 yeah i wouldn’t recommend having your enemy’s dialog in ur mind through an implant i like it better when you’re not in my head https://t.co/9FPL5Hlyy0 @elonmusk @wealth_turtle @DramaAlert been there brother @elonmusk we might be more alike than i thought. https://t.co/DWPilUS8yX RT @77815x: @aidungeon is fucking awesome!!!!!!!!!!! @aidungeon is fucking awesome!!!!!!!!!!! @elonmusk what is my purpose if i do have an implant, i noticed a new type of jolt which was i get shocked in my right top molar LLM's will change everything in a good way not to be that guy but i asked grok: The statement reflects a perspective often discussed on platforms like X, where it's suggested that reducing bureaucratic red tape and moving government functions to the private sector could lead to significant economic growth and prosperity, potentially ushering in a "golden age" for America by enhancing efficiency and innovation. However, this view is part of a broader debate, with critics arguing that regulations serve important public interests and that privatization doesn't always lead to the promised efficiencies or benefits for all segments of society. @cb_doge @elonmusk https://t.co/QFu0pclIJT https://t.co/FS4URVxA6k @RobertKennedyJr probably true, but pro choice @ayeejuju u have power! consumers you have power! @dave24144975 why would he show his dick to a kid bring back mental institutions @KamalaHQ why dont u just incentivize a better debate with real time fact, checking discussions, and no commercial breaks? @CatchUpFeed kinda alot of salt but shes doing okay @elonmusk we can fix the dmv @charliekirk11 we need better cops man @iam_smx somethings going on and i dont know what to do @RealCrazyFight_ maybe he didnt know @greg16676935420 i predict a societal collapse @KettlebellDan twitter has an llm @elonmusk is this true? @merissahansen17 this is why X is important @elonmusk 👏 @elonmusk @peta true @crazyclipsonly saw a right eye white dot say yeah i feel like i definitely have an implant @crimeTV_ couldnt find the right sensitive content report but these should have some disclaimer on them imo ama ask people what and how they mean things for the future ones who visit this rock in space please. autonomy hostage bci removal> a partner what are you trying to tell me X algo and peoples. if i hand out free coffee will you all dm me. if i collect coins off the floor and offer it to you will you then tell me. @InsaneRealitys pretty cool @Alphafox78 asking where someone lives is kinda weird. @KamalaHarris freedom of choice, i think you be able to have an abortion if you want @yacineMTB probably @unkonfined i mean im pretty sure i have a bci in my brain @crimeTV_ fuck man. @unkonfined ask grok @unkonfined https://t.co/yadgq57kfe @elonmusk i am interested in this, and how. I think ads would work! do you see this? im not sure if its autonomous but im open to seeing if it is, are you? https://t.co/jDkAu3T0LN How to avoid America turning into Gaza.

At some point in history we may find ourselves with no jobs. Its really all in the numbers here, the United States has a limited amount of jobs, people come into America, there is a shortage of jobs. And this will only increase. So what does a society do that runs on a labor based economy?

This is real. There is no time for labeling communism or socialism, its beyond these labels to avoid to make the future not a dystopia. We are on Earth, we are all we have as a species. The shows, are nice and the entertainment is nice but it will not save us.

We will ultimately need to discuss this as a species, or at least Americans. It will need to be on the mind of all who are involved with the future. This is the asteroid. Look to the Experts they will tell you the same.

If the world is on fire, we are the ones who can put it out or prevent such things. I think the future truly is automation. Building machines for labor. I have found that I am not the only one to think of this or discuss this in this link here:

https://t.co/TvyJF1gPdB

However, we will have to discuss such things and shape things as if there is a chance for a utopia. “By striving to do the impossible, man has always achieved what is possible. Those who have cautiously done no more than they believed possible have never taken a single step forward.” ~ Mikhail Bakunin. @hartgoat jusy fix him food and do his laundry and dont sign ur divorce papers 🤷‍♂️ @astro_greek @elonmusk 🥺 @PicturesFoIder https://t.co/jrTYK88SZm @AunySillyMe thanks auny @historyinmemes amazing technology @ImMeme0 there will be many videos like this in the future, hopefully not you know u are destroying me right? @GRIMES_V1 i hope not @theyvonnesayers probably @libsoftiktok @WestBroadwayMS 2 things, i guess he did some vandalism i do not understand why the guy is still filming him. @WallStreetSilv i would feel like a pos if i lived in this everyday https://t.co/2iwPraiY9q @Grimezsz i love this https://t.co/9KoCASRZBL RT @77815x: 2024 https://t.co/r4PeaX2XBA https://t.co/BuTlX6LMh5 @imPenny2x ❤️ RT @77815x: https://t.co/RpeRXyZ6lQ RT @77815x: https://t.co/BuTlX6LMh5 @sierracatalina1 🤨 @GRIMES_V1 yes @AdrianDittmann me @stillgray we should not offer monetary aid but rather actual development https://t.co/NeXQUJxHFL

https://t.co/CMCEyPOCzP

https://t.co/VDFhH1oa27

https://t.co/mbcpShvgcb https://t.co/0lhtgPn9ww @sierracatalina1 i hope so i guess ill just keep using X until someone tells me not to. or @‘s me @elonmusk thats what im saying! @elonmusk i wont keep bothering you i know your a busy man. here is my letter in case anything happens to my page here on x https://t.co/vyTNVMCaBg https://t.co/IFBkOsAdTm https://t.co/rgpsBUoN7T https://t.co/nEgM832yiz Real-time streaming of Earth, ISS Detector, rocket launches coverage and more. Download ISS Live Now!

https://t.co/lCvc7hfJqh @imPenny2x lets hope so https://t.co/q5k3dKlsid @realDonaldTrump @KamalaHarris @RobertKennedyJr @POTUS

Wegner explains that when individuals try to suppress a thought, they may feel it difficult and then become curious about why the thought is so persistent. Although they may be able to suppress the thought temporarily, later reminders of the thought can produce a preoccupation with the formerly hidden thought. Initial suppression therefore paradoxically increases the frequency of unwanted thoughts eventually.[4]

like as soon as a dialog says don’t look at that, my mind if I can even call it that anymore(getting jolted as I type this btw) will see it instantly, this does not occur all of the time or did it in the past 2 months or so I would say. I just cant overthink I have to keep moving. my mind has to see, but not overthink the dialog.

if this bci is autonomous and I don’t have control GFY. sorry. but how else am I supposed to feel. if this never used to happen and now it does not by my doing then how would you expect me to feel?

I need to see it, the proof of it all. I will always be for the proof of it.

, Robert.