Where is the love? The upper sea car exhibit under the refrigerated line is certainly a hot spot. During the 10-day meeting, industry and users together witnessed the collective bidding of fuel vehicles, the beginning of a new wave of competition in the intelligentization of electric vehicles, intensive industry research by the skirmishes team, and the “new heights” retrieved.

Thermal is also taking place in the Licorne forest of Hangzhou, where the new year’s Licorne Licorne List has been published, with more than 20 post-commencement enterprises continuing to write the business history of the city, from industrial intellectuals, medical science and technology to industrialization.

In this month, we also launched the first round of interviews on the “Ten-Ten-Ten-Ten-Ten-Ten” (MINIEYE) founder Liu, who spoke about how he was going to be a “brainer” producer from Dr. Ha’s naturalization, and we look forward to recording the resilience and determination of more science and technology entrepreneurs.

Below, you are sharing with you new developments in throws and post-delivery partners.

Dynamics of the United States dollar

Looking ahead Licorne: On 12 April 2023, the Seventh Millenium Development Congress launched the “The Future Licorne Congress of China”, with 12 eminent investment agencies, such as the China Investment Development Promotion Board, the One-stop platform for innovative industrial services, the Microchain Capital, jointly launched the “Please for the Future Licorne” scheme.

✦ Award: 2023 China’s most active AIGC Investment Agency

Expressing speed: Liu, a tenant capital partner, has been able to share his “front-line vision” for the upper sea car exhibit, and to look at the innovative opportunities that he has revealed from the new heights of the car exhibit “volved”

✦ “Ten-tech tens”: First, Liu, the founder of MINIEYE, retrospected his window of access to China for reshaping the industrial chain in the vehicle market.

Post-conversion project developments

Science and technology awards after 02

List of Licorne and Licorne Enterprise, Hangzhou

Rokid, micro, small electrotechnology, good-quality medical treatment, future science and technology, cloud science and technology, advanced science and technology, mercial science and technology, novelty, hundreds of millions of clouds, tetrametry, secondary education, Fordal, whale, bihydrooxygen, harbouring, penitentiary, bar, bag rat clouds, clouds and clouds

Table 100

Intelligent, tantalum PV, light hose, throwing and innovation

China’s future Licorne series

More access to science and technology, good-quality medical care, more commercial science and technology, and to medicinal science and technology

Deep science and technology

Additional views by Deep Tech, founder of deep science and technology and selected by CSO for the peak of the forest, Deep Tech, “China’s intelligent science and technology in 2022”.

Wirtschaftsprüfer’s brand of best employer

Quality medical care

Additional views on the “Further Licorne TOP 100 List for the Future of China”

Murray science and technology

Received the name “Integrated Software and Information Technology Services” for 2022.

Three international awards! Mercure science and technology gained a great deal in RSAC 2023 to gain more access.

Lighting

Topical Intelligent Vehicles 2022-2023 China’s Wirtschaftsprüfer List

Yumkiya Group

Option 2023 Licorne for Scientific and Technological Innovation (CITE) 90 List Paper

Smolay cloud Science and Technology

Need for thought

Co-founder, Lead Scientist, Yukio Takasu, was given more access to the New Wise TOP10.

Leaflith

Regardless of the front-line scientific and technological exploration or the evolution of industries on the ground, entrepreneurs are moving forward in a footprint, and the exploration itself is the driving force behind progress, and it is expected that more innovation will occur in the spring.

Mr. Chen, the owner of Wenzhou, sent a letter of apology, which made a big reversal of Tesla’s “ghost brake” incident.

On the evening of May 9, Mr. Chen, once a member of the “Tesla brake failure” rights protection group, issued a public apology letter on his microblog, admitting that he fabricated the fact of “Tesla automatic acceleration brake failure” to slander Tesla, and said that “Ms. Henan car advocate and Mr. Han, the owner of Tianjin, also contacted me”.

The expression of “there is something in the words” leads the direction of public opinion from “safeguarding rights” to various conjectures such as “whether someone is organizing a group of black Tesla”.

Some netizens believe that this series of rights protection events is difficult to get rid of the suspicion that a team concocted black materials to frame Tesla. “I have friends around me who are Tesla owners, but they haven’t had such a problem, so I have reason to suspect that (defenders) have impure motives.” Some netizens also believe that the infinite enlargement of individual cases is to generalize, “if a case is found to be a rumor, can we judge whether the previous and subsequent cases are rumor? Can we judge that the rights protection group is trying to extort?”

In the face of Mr. Chen’s apology letter, Han Chao, the owner of Tianjin Tesla (the court ordered Tesla to refund one and compensate three), launched a “counterattack” on his microblog for the first time. He posted a screenshot of a chat with Mr. Chen, which showed that Mr. Chen admitted that the apology letter came from Tesla. Han Chao believes that Mr. Chen is “throwing dirty water on others in order to reduce punishment or obtain understanding”.

Screenshots of chat records show that the apology letter was written by Tesla. Source: pictures provided by respondents

In this regard, in an interview with Caijing Tianxia weekly, Tesla did not deny the “ghostwriting” apology letter, but only stressed that “all the contents of the apology letter can withstand scrutiny, the content is true, the procedure is proper and the owner is voluntary”.

Zhang Yazhou, the Henan car owner mentioned in the apology letter (the party involved in roof rights protection), has even collected good information and sent a lawyer letter to Mr. Chen, asking him to make a public apology, otherwise he will be investigated for legal responsibility.

Zhang Yazhou’s public lawyer’s letter (part)

The “infighting” among rights holders has made the truth more complicated and confusing.

“Why throw dirty water on me?”

Zhang Yazhou mentioned in Mr. Chen’s letter of apology is the owner of Tesla’s roof at the 2021 Shanghai auto show. Seeing the words described in the letter “Ms. Henan car advocate and Mr. Han, the owner of Tianjin, also contacted me” and “I quit the group because of different ideas”, Zhang Yazhou was very puzzled, “why do you throw dirty water on me?” This letter of apology is like “a former ‘comrade in arms’ bit himself back”.

On May 11, Zhang Yazhou was interviewed by future auto daily. She said that she did not take the initiative to contact Mr. Chen, but that after entering the rights protection wechat group, Mr. Chen took the initiative to add himself as a friend through the group and provided a 100 yuan red envelope for help.

Zhang Yazhou recalled that in the group chat, she and other rights protection car owners may have had an argument with Mr. Chen on “overthrowing Tesla’s official identification report”. Everyone reminded him that he wanted to get insurance claims and rights protection, which was contradictory “.

In his apology letter, Mr. Chen mentioned that Mr. Feng, a Tesla owner in Shanghai, introduced him to a legal platform called “Weisha”. Zhang Yazhou revealed that relevant personnel of the platform also took the initiative to contact her in March 2021 and said they were “willing to bear the cost of safeguarding rights” to provide assistance.

The staff of “Weisha” actively contacted Zhang Yazhou source: pictures provided by respondents

In Zhang Yazhou’s view, the platform’s initiative to provide help is nothing more than the hope to improve the popularity of the law firm through some “online popularity” cases, “these are normal procedures. Rights owners are not so extreme, we just hope to be fair and clarify the truth”.

On the evening of February 21, 2021, Zhang Yazhou’s father had an accident driving model 3 in the village section of the south section of Anyang 341 national highway. On the 27th of that month, Zhang Yazhou had the first disagreement with Tesla automobile sales service (Zhengzhou) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Tesla Zhengzhou company) on the accident data. The query points include the time node of the accident, deceleration data, whether the brake works, etc.

After several unsuccessful official mediation, Zhang Yazhou had to climb on the roof of Tesla at the 2021 Shanghai auto show.

The following year, Zhang Yazhou and Tesla fell into a seemingly endless entanglement. Zhang Yazhou officially filed a lawsuit against Tesla and its vice president of foreign affairs, Ms. Tao Lin. Tesla officials asked Zhang Yazhou to apologize and compensate for the loss of reputation rights of 5 million yuan.

Zhang Yazhou was administratively detained for seven days because of the rights protection incident at the Shanghai auto show. She called on the public not to take such an extreme way of occupying public resources to protect their rights. However, she still insisted on safeguarding her legitimate rights and interests. “Safeguarding rights itself is not illegal, but the way needs to be legal, compliant, reasonable and reasonable”.

In this confrontation with obvious disparity in strength, Zhang Yazhou lamented that he was like a different person. “In the year and two months from picking up the car to the accident, I changed from a loyal fan of the brand to an aggressive rights owner”. “The once happy and peaceful life can only exist in memory now,” Zhang Yazhou said frankly. At the beginning of safeguarding rights, he “hid in the bathroom and cried every afternoon”.

After embarking on the road of safeguarding rights, lawsuits filled every day of Zhang Yazhou’s life. She has to sort out relevant materials together with lawyers every day, rush back and forth with regulatory authorities in Anyang, Zhengzhou, Beijing and other places, provide relevant evidence to relevant departments, and constantly urge Tesla to hand over complete data to make full preparations for going to court.

As of press time, the future auto daily learned that the case of Zhang Yazhou suing Tesla and Tao Lin for violating the right of reputation had been heard on December 24, 2021, and the trial time of the case has been extended to July 28, 2022. Meanwhile, the case of Tesla suing Zhang Yazhou for an apology and compensation for the loss of reputation of 5 million yuan has also been suspended.

Compared with Zhang Yazhou, Tianjin Tesla owner Han Chao is more “lucky”. On August 24, 2019, the words “model s” and “model s” showed that the second-hand vehicle could not be driven at night, and then the official vehicle was completely shut down. After the accident, Han Chao immediately proposed to return and replace the vehicle, which was rejected by Tesla