原创作者： 孙树涛

逻辑声明： 意向单向性、不可回流性、真伪自证性。

1. 核心定义与算式 (Core Definitions)

BVB 协议是一种基于非对称博弈的意向确证机制。它通过剥夺发起者的回流权，强制将主观意向转化为物理发生的确定性。

1.1 能量状态三元组 (The Trinity State)

在一个 AB 矢量实例中，所有注入的能量 $E$ 在任何时刻 $t$ 必须满足：

$$E_{total} = E_{Yang} + E_{Yin} + E_{Sacrifice}$$

其中：

• $E_{Yang}$ (阳位余额)：处于“待命”状态的能量，发起者仅保留流向裁量权。

• $E_{Yin}$ (阴位合流)：已实现的意向，能量归属于接收方。

• $E_{Sacrifice}$ (牺牲湮灭)：证伪的意向，能量进入不可逆转的毁灭状态。

1.2 不可回流公理 (Non-reflux Axiom)

这是 BVB 协议的最高法。对于 Yang 注入的任何能量 $E_i$，其流向函数 $f$ 定义为：

$$f(E_i) \in \{Yin, Sacrifice\}, \quad f(E_i) \neq Yang$$

即：回流路径在逻辑上被物理封死。

2. 逻辑引擎与动态感知 (Logical Engine)

2.1 边际释放算法 (Marginal Release)

阳位拥有对 $E_{Yang}$ 的动态控制权，通过一系列原子操作指令 $\phi$ 进行颗粒化释放：

$$\phi(e, \rho) \rightarrow \begin{cases} e \cdot \rho \Rightarrow Yin \\ e \cdot (1-\rho) \Rightarrow Sacrifice \end{cases}$$

其中 $\rho$ 为释放系数 ($0 \le \rho \le 1$)。这一过程不依赖第三方仲裁，仅依赖阳位对“真实性”的感知。

2.2 时钟坍缩机制 (Temporal Collapse)

每个矢量关联一个绝对时间戳 $T_{expiry}$。当 $t \ge T_{expiry}$ 且 $E_{Yang} > 0$ 时，触发逻辑坍缩：

$$\text{If } t \ge T_{expiry}, \quad E_{Yang} \xrightarrow{DefaultPath} \{Yin \text{ or } Sacrifice\}$$

该机制确保了意向的终局性，不存在永久滞留的能量。

3. 产权与实现策略 (Implementation Strategy)

3.1 极简主义实现 (Minimalist Implementation)

本协议的核心实现不应超过 150 行 Solidity 代码。其安全性不来源于复杂的风控系统，而来源于：

1. 逻辑自治：除 Yang 外，没有任何角色（包括开发者）拥有操作权限。

2. 代码透明：合约部署后，代码即公开，任何第三方均可审计其“不可回流”的执行路径。

3.2 产权声明 (Property Rights)

• 首创权：本协议定义的“通过自毁威慑实现非对称取信”的逻辑架构，其原创权归属于孙树涛。

• 开源协议建议：建议使用 BSL (Business Source License) 1.1。在特定日期前，任何商业化大规模复制需获得原作者授权；此后自动转为 GPL 协议，贡献给全人类。

4. 结语：能量作为指心的工具

BVB 协议拒绝自欺。它将“钱”这种世俗的工具转化为一种内省的语言。在这个模型下，消失的能量不是损失，而是对虚假意向的物理结算。

状态 (Status)： 技术定型稿 (Technical Specification)
关联引用 (Reference)： 附件一《从支付事实到关系本体》(Annex I: Philosophy & Ontology)

1. 核心定义与系统架构 (Core Definitions & System Architecture)

1.1 节点属性 (Node Attributes)

一个 AB 矢量位 (AB Vector Position) 是在分布式账本上运行的独立逻辑单元。其核心参数定义如下：
An AB Vector Position is an independent logical unit running on a distributed ledger. Its core parameters are defined as follows:

• $Addr_{Yang}$ (阳位地址)：矢量发起端，拥有对该节点的唯一控制权。
  (Yang Position Address): The initiator of the vector, holding exclusive control over the node.

• $Addr_{Yin}$ (阴位地址)：矢量指向端，被动感知方。
  (Yin Position Address): The target of the vector, the passive perceiver.

• $M$ (初始动能)：注入节点的代币总量。
  (Initial Kinetic Energy): The total amount of tokens injected into the node.

• $T_{expiry}$ (截止时限)：逻辑自动坍缩的时间戳阈值。
  (Expiry Time): The timestamp threshold for automatic logical collapse.

• $\Omega_{default}$ (预设路径)：定义在 $T > T_{expiry}$ 时的默认结算方向，可选值为 ${Yin, Sacrifice}$。
  (Default Path): Defines the default settlement direction when $T > T_{expiry}$, with options ${Yin, Sacrifice}$.

1.2 系统角色 (System Roles)

• 指向器 (Pointer)：阳位端，用于参数配置与资金注入。
  (Pointer): The Yang side, used for parameter configuration and capital injection.

• 感知器 (Perceiver)：阴位端，通过监听事件（Event Logs）实现状态监控，无需发起链上交互。
  (Perceiver): The Yin side, monitoring state via Event Logs without initiating on-chain interactions.

• 牺牲池 (Sacrifice Pool)：系统级的无主（Renounced）合约，作为“意向断裂”的最终吸收端。
  (Sacrifice Pool): A system-level renounced contract, serving as the ultimate sink for "ruptured intentions."

2. AB 矢量的生命周期 (Life Cycle of AB Vector)

2.1 潜伏与显化 (Stealth & Manifestation)

协议利用 $CREATE2$ 确定性地址算法。
The protocol utilizes the $CREATE2$ deterministic address algorithm.

• 潜伏 (Potential)：在 $M=0$ 时，节点仅存在于由 ${Addr_{Yang}, Addr_{Yin}, Salt}$ 计算出的哈希空间中。
  (Potential): When $M=0$, the node exists only in the hash space calculated from ${Addr_{Yang}, Addr_{Yin}, Salt}$.

• 激发 (Manifestation)：阳位通过工厂合约向该地址注入资金。节点状态转为 Excited (激发态)。
  (Manifestation): Yang injects funds into the address via the factory contract. The node state transitions to Excited.

2.2 阳位中段干预逻辑 (Intermediate Execution Logic)

在 $T < T_{expiry}$ 期间，阳位可随时通过指令调整当前余额 $m$ 的分配。该操作具有任意时点性与颗粒度自定性。
During $T < T_{expiry}$, Yang can adjust the allocation of the current balance $m$ at any time. This operation is time-independent and granular.

• $\phi_{to_Yin}(x)$：将 $x$ 数量的资金即时释放至阴位地址。
  Immediately release $x$ amount of funds to the Yin address.

• $\phi_{to_Sacrifice}(y)$：将 $y$ 数量的资金即时推入牺牲池。
  Immediately push $y$ amount of funds into the Sacrifice Pool.

• 约束条件 (Constraints)：执行后，节点剩余动能 $m' = m - x - y$。系统不提供回流至 $Addr_{Yang}$ 的函数接口。
  (Constraints): After execution, the remaining energy is $m' = m - x - y$. The system provides no interface for reflux to $Addr_{Yang}$.

2.3 自动坍缩机制 (Auto-Collapse Mechanism)

当系统检测到当前区块高度时间 $T \geq T_{expiry}$ 且 $m > 0$ 时，触发自动结算逻辑：
When the system detects $T \geq T_{expiry}$ and $m > 0$, the auto-settlement logic is triggered:

• 若 $\Omega_{default} = Yin$：$m$ 自动转账至 $Addr_{Yin}$。
  If $\Omega_{default} = Yin$: $m$ is automatically transferred to $Addr_{Yin}$.

• 若 $\Omega_{default} = Sacrifice$：$m$ 自动转账至牺牲池。
  If $\Omega_{default} = Sacrifice$: $m$ is automatically transferred to the Sacrifice Pool.

3. 技术保证：不可追索性 (Non-Pursuability)

3.1 零操作证明 (Zero-Action Proof)

阴位在整个生命周期中无需签名、无需确认、无需支付 Gas。这种静默接收机制确保了 B 在法律与技术层面的“主体被动性”。在逻辑层面，B 不是合约的签署方，而是矢量波动的观测者。
Yin requires no signature, confirmation, or Gas throughout the lifecycle. This silent reception ensures B's "subjective passivity" legally and technically. Logically, B is not a signatory but an observer of vector fluctuations.

3.2 牺牲池逻辑规格 (Sacrifice Pool Specification)

• 不可逆性 (Irreversibility)：该合约地址的代码逻辑不包含 withdraw 或 transfer 指令。
  The contract code contains no withdraw or transfer instructions.

• 公开性 (Visibility)：所有流入牺牲池的资金均带有原始 AB 矢量的 $Metadata$，供全网回溯。
  All funds entering the pool carry the original AB vector $Metadata$ for public traceability.

4. 逻辑模型伪代码 (Technical Pseudocode)

Solidity

// BVB 协议：AB 矢量位核心逻辑 (支持动态流)
// BVB Protocol: AB Vector Core Logic (Streaming Supported)

struct ABPosition {
    address yang;          // 阳位 (Yang Position)
    address yin;           // 阴位 (Yin Position)
    uint256 balance;       // 当前池内动能余额 (Current Balance)
    uint256 expiry;        // 截止时限 (Expiry Timestamp)
    enum DefaultPath { Yin, Sacrifice } defaultPath; // 自动坍缩预设
}

// 1. 动态注入 (Multiple Injections / Top-up)
// 允许阳位在生命周期内随时追加能量，增强指向强度
function topUp(bytes32 positionId) external payable onlyYang {
    ABPosition storage p = positions[positionId];
    require(block.timestamp < p.expiry, "Beam already collapsed");
    p.balance += msg.value; // 动能叠加 (Energy Superposition)
    emit EnergyInjected(positionId, msg.value, p.balance);
}

// 2. 边际执行 (Marginal / Multiple Executions)
// 阳位可分次释放或牺牲部分能量，余额继续保留
function executeManually(bytes32 positionId, uint256 amountToYin, uint256 amountToSacrifice) external onlyYang {
    ABPosition storage p = positions[positionId];
    require(block.timestamp < p.expiry, "Expired");
    require(amountToYin + amountToSacrifice <= p.balance, "Insufficient balance");

    if (amountToYin > 0) {
        transfer(p.yin, amountToYin);           // 意向显化 (Manifestation)
    }
    if (amountToSacrifice > 0) {
        transfer(sacrificePool, amountToSacrifice); // 意向牺牲 (Sacrifice)
    }
    
    p.balance -= (amountToYin + amountToSacrifice); // 扣除已执行部分
    emit MarginalExecution(positionId, amountToYin, amountToSacrifice, p.balance);
}

// 3. 终极坍缩 (Final Settlement)
// 到期时，将当前剩余余额一并推向预设路径
function autoSettle(bytes32 positionId) external {
    ABPosition storage p = positions[positionId];
    require(block.timestamp >= p.expiry, "Not expired");
    uint256 remaining = p.balance;
    require(remaining > 0, "No remaining energy");

    if (p.defaultPath == DefaultPath.Yin) {
        transfer(p.yin, remaining);
    } else {
        transfer(sacrificePool, remaining);
    }
    p.balance = 0; // 状态彻底关闭
    emit BeamCollapsed(positionId, p.defaultPath, remaining);
}

5. 结论：作为支付语言的完备性 (Payment Language Completeness)

通过“动态注入”、“边际分流”与“终极坍缩”的闭环，BVB 协议在技术层面完成了一套完备的表达语言： Through the closure of "dynamic injection," "marginal split," and "final collapse," the BVB protocol completes a comprehensive expressive language:

• 连续性 (Continuity)：通过 topUp 实现了关系在时间中的增长与加温。

• 灵活性 (Flexibility)：通过多次 executeManually 支持了极其复杂的、边际递增的博弈场景。

• 安全性 (Security)：单向流动逻辑（Non-reflux）确保了“主体不被追索”的法理根基。

This concludes the AB Technical Implementation (Revised). It serves as the logical backbone for the Scenario Dictionary.

BVB 协议白皮书：从支付事实到关系本体

BVB Protocol Whitepaper: From Payment Facts to Relational Ontology

（2023 - 2026 创世发布稿 · 最终定稿版） (2023 - 2026 Genesis Release · Final Version)

作者 / Author: 孙树涛 (Shutao Sun) 存证声明 / Provenance: 本文确立 BVB 协议关于“共钱账户”与“关系本体论”的原始发现权。This document establishes the original discovery rights of the BVB Protocol regarding the "Common Money Account" and "Relational Ontology." 存证哈希 / Attestation Hash: mVdiqxyPmaaPDfQEaNbh9_i8TO6sEc-4hskeBqTiQ10

---

---

BVB 存在主义宣言

BVB: An Existentialist Manifesto

不要用枪指着我的头Do not aim a gun at my head,

请用钱指着我的心Aim your money at my heart.

我感知着你的感知In sensing your senses, I find the arc;

我在你在，故你在我在I am in you, you are in me—In our co-presence, we truly come to be.

---

BVB 协议：推介随想与时空胶囊 (2026)

BVB Protocol: Promotional Musings & Time Capsule (2026)

[维度一：形而上的自省]

[Dimension I: Metaphysical Introspection]

“世界是事实的总和，而非事物的总和。” "The world is the totality of facts, not of things."

在支付语境下，主体不是账户的总和，而是共钱账户（CMA）的总和。 In the context of payment, a subject is not the sum of accounts, but the sum of Common Money Accounts (CMAs).

历时三年，BVB 协议正式发布：从 2023 年的“隐藏维度”初探，到 2026 年的“位对位”逻辑坍缩。 After three years, the BVB Protocol is officially released: from the initial exploration of the "Hidden Dimension" in 2023 to the logical collapse of "Bit versus Bit" in 2026.

我们不解决问题，我们只回答存在。 We do not solve problems; we only answer for "Being."

[维度二：原子级的解构]

[Dimension II: Atomic Deconstruction]

阴沟里有生态，地狱里有交易。 There is an ecology in the gutters; there are transactions in hell.

为什么我们永远不能信赖对手？因为信任应向内求。 Why can we never trust our counterparty? Because trust must be sought inward.

BVB 协议：一种点对点边际支付的共钱账户。通过“一分一粒”的微观解构，熨平现实中的“债波”。 BVB Protocol: A Common Money Account for P2P marginal payment. Through the microscopic deconstruction of "one cent, one seed," it smooths the "Debt-Waves" of reality.

让支付回归原子事实，让能量在“给你”与“牺牲”之间确立逻辑。 Let payment return to atomic facts; let energy establish logic between "To you" and "Sacrifice."

[维度三：人本位的归宿]

[Dimension III: Human-Centric Destination]

“就让 BVB 做个中吧，你我亲自做个人。” "Let BVB be the Medium; you and I shall personally be Human."

从一包瓜子的博弈，到人人关系的终极解构。 From the gaming of a bag of seeds to the ultimate deconstruction of inter-human relations.

BVB 协议不依赖“好人”，它只信赖数学与自信。 The BVB Protocol does not rely on "good people"; it trusts only in mathematics and self-confidence.

这份保留了历史原貌的白皮书，献给所有追求绝对自由与独立的主体。 This whitepaper, preserved in its historical form, is dedicated to all subjects pursuing absolute freedom and independence.

“To be or not to be, it is a question. Being answered.” “在，或不在，是个问题。回答中。”

---

序言：世界是事实的总和

Preface: The World is the Totality of Facts

维特根斯坦言：“世界是事实的总和，而非事物的总和。”在支付的语境下，主体不是账户的总和，而是共钱账户的总和。传统的支付系统关注“事物”（货币、余额、中心化账本），而 BVB（Bit Versus Bit）协议 关注“事实”（关系、交互、边际流转）。通过对点对点（PvP）关系的无限分析，发现那个隐匿在人人间货币交互维度中的本原——共钱账户（Common Money Account, CMA）。

Wittgenstein stated: "The world is the totality of facts, not of things." In the context of payment, a subject is not the sum of accounts, but the sum of common money accounts. Traditional payment systems focus on "things" (currency, balances, centralized ledgers), while the BVB (Bit Versus Bit) Protocol focuses on "facts" (relationships, interactions, marginal flows). Through infinite analysis of peer-to-peer (PvP) relationships, we discover the primordial element hidden within the dimension of human monetary interaction—the Common Money Account (CMA).

---

第一章：第一性原理 —— 关系本体论

Chapter 1: First Principles — Relational Ontology

1.1 从 Human 到 Peer 再到 Bit 的坍缩

1.1 Collapse from Human to Peer to Bit

人（Human）在社会关系中是复合且含混的；一人多点（Peer），一点多位（Bit）。位（Bit）是关系的最小动量矢量，是有方向的，每一位基于其对手位而存在。BVB 协议将交互约化为“位”，是对点对点（PvP）的深度解构，旨在探寻交互最底层的原子逻辑。

The "Human" in social relations is complex and ambiguous; one person spans multiple "Peers," and one peer occupies multiple "Bits." A "Bit" is the minimal momentum vector of a relationship—it is directional, with each bit existing by virtue of its counter-bit. The BVB Protocol reduces interactions to "Bits," providing a deep deconstruction of PvP to explore the underlying atomic logic of interaction.

1.2 隐藏维度的先验存在：共钱账户 (CMA)

1.2 The A Priori Existence of Hidden Dimensions: Common Money Account (CMA)

共钱账户（如 12345678）是先验存在的“因”，而主体 A（1234）与 B（5678）是其与众多其他共钱账户合成的“果”。

• 主体即总和：所谓主体 A，本质上是所有以 1234 开头或结尾的共钱账户的集合总和。

  
  

• 向度定义唯一性：12345678 与 56781234 互为镜像向度，这种矢量性决定了 CMA 在逻辑空间中的唯一坐标。

  
  

• 本体地位：Common Money Account 是“活”的场域。它不属于任何一方，而是交互关系的本体。

  
  

The CMA (e.g., 12345678) is the a priori "Cause," while Subjects A (1234) and B (5678) are the "Effects" synthesized from their respective CMAs.

• Subject as Totality: Subject A is essentially the sum of all CMAs beginning or ending with 1234.

• Dimensional Uniqueness: 12345678 and 56781234 are mirror dimensions; this vector nature determines the unique coordinate of a CMA in logical space.

• Ontological Status: The Common Money Account is a "living" field. It belongs to no single party but is the ontology of the interaction itself.

1.3 绝对个人主义：自信之外，再无信任

1.3 Absolute Individualism: No Trust Needed Beyond Self-Confidence

在 BVB 场域内，人是绝对自由且独立的。除了主体的“自信”（对自身理性与逻辑的信赖），任何形式的信任（Trust）都不被需要。

Within the BVB field, the individual is absolutely free and independent. Beyond the subject's "Self-Confidence" (reliance on one’s own rationality and logic), no form of "Trust" is required.

---

第二章：核心机制 —— 边际出清与流态支付

Chapter 2: Core Mechanism — Marginal Clearing & Fluidic Payment

2.1 从向度到债粒

2.1 From Dimension to Debt-Particle

在大额交易的不确定性面前，独立主体自然、理性地选择将交易解构为微小的“债粒”。支付不再是一个孤立的瞬间，而是随信息流、交付流同步移动的连续“流”。

Facing the uncertainty of large transactions, independent subjects naturally and rationally choose to deconstruct transactions into tiny "Debt-Particles." Payment is no longer an isolated moment but a continuous "flow" moving synchronously with information and delivery.

2.2 单向能量指向与“牺牲”逻辑

2.2 Unidirectional Energy Direction & "Sacrifice" Logic

资金注入共钱账户，即意味着主体能量从通用状态进入特定关系维度。其逻辑本质是：“To you or to not you”。指向销毁（Burn）并非虚无的浪费，而是主体自信的最高证明——宁愿能量回归背景事实，亦不违背逻辑方向。

Injecting funds into a CMA means the subject's energy shifts from a general state to a specific relational dimension. The logical essence is: "To you or to not you." Pointing toward "Burn" is not wasteful; it is the ultimate proof of self-confidence—preferring energy to return to the background fact rather than violating logical direction.

---

第三章：事业计划 —— 走向宁静的交互

Chapter 3: Vision — Towards Tranquil Interaction

3.1 宗旨：均衡即正义

3.1 Objective: Equilibrium is Justice

人类货币交互的本质是“债”。BVB 提供原子级的工具，让主体能够自主处理所属维度的债波，实现**“平静即幸福”**。

The essence of human monetary interaction is "Debt." BVB provides atomic tools allowing subjects to autonomously manage debt-waves within their dimensions, achieving "Tranquility is Happiness."

3.2 普适性：三路分离的必然

3.2 Universality: The Necessity of Triple-Path Separation

通过信息流、交付流、支付流的三路分离，BVB 适用于一切支付场景。它不再依赖“好人”，而是通过逻辑的回归与重构，将责任连同权利一并交给**“大写的人”**。

By separating information, delivery, and payment flows, BVB applies to all scenarios. It no longer relies on "good people" but restores responsibility and rights to the "Individual with a Capital I" through logical reconstruction.

---

结语 / Conclusion

BVB 不是一种工具的改良，而是一种存在方式的发现。 BVB is not an improvement of a tool, but the discovery of a way of being.

To be or not to be, it is a question. Being answered.

---

第二部分：历史底稿一（2023 年春）

Part II: Historical Manuscript I (Spring 2023)

《BVB：一种点对点边际支付的共钱账户》 "BVB: A Common Money Account for P2P Marginal Payment"

“...关于 A(1234) 与 B(5678) 交互时生成的隐藏维度 12345678 的初步构想... 此时提到的双向共钱逻辑在 2026 年版本中已简化为单向原子动作... 强调支付不需要信赖对手，只需要信赖数学...” "...Preliminary conception of the hidden dimension 12345678 generated during the interaction between A(1234) and B(5678)... The bilateral common money logic mentioned here has been simplified to unidirectional atomic actions in the 2026 version... emphasizing that payment requires no trust in the counterparty, only trust in mathematics..."

概要 Summary

0.1 本文不是解决问题的，而是回答存在的。 0.2 通过对人人关系的分析，转向对支付的分析，发现那个生成在一个隐藏维 度中的第三者。 0.3 研究这种第三者的属性，并为之设想一个通用的所在，使得人人间更平 滑、更丰富而更美好。 0.4 三个基本原则： 1、为了适应人而设计，优先于为了解决问题而设计（天下本无事，一定要说 有，只是“旱的时候旱死、涝的时候涝死”）； 2、若非必要勿增实体，若增实体务增最小。 3、最小颗粒、可永动的流化原则 0.1 This paper is not for problem-solving, but for answering "being." 0.2 Through the analysis of inter-human relations, we shift to the analysis of payment and discover the "third party" generated within a hidden dimension. 0.3 By studying the attributes of this third party and envisioning a universal locus for it, we aim to make human interactions smoother, richer, and better. 0.4 Three basic principles: 1. Designed to adapt to humans, prioritized over being designed to solve problems (The world is inherently untroubled; to insist it is, is merely "drought in one place, flood in another"); 2. Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity; if added, they must be minimal; 3. The principle of minimal granularity and perpetual fluidization.

引言 Introduction

致敬中本聪，不知是一个人还是一个小组，在2008年发表的白皮书—《比特 币：一种点对点电子现金系统》里，从支付出发，却给出了一个前所未有的系 统。 虽然没有很多人去咀嚼比特币的系统属性，但它确凿无疑是一个系统，起码被 追随者们发展成了系统。拥趸们奉白皮书为圣经，正如传统的《圣经》，在叙事 性和寓言性之上，更感召人们去依托的，正是其整全性。 有关系统性的启示，同样给到了货币的范畴。视货币为特殊商品，是那些实在 老掉牙的教科书观点了。而那些愿意用列举其功能的方式来定义它的，更是些 不知何为定义的家伙了。然而要令人信服地回答货币到底是啥，大概不会比定 义“人”和定义“世界”容易太多。 青年维特根斯坦曾断言，“世界是事实的总和，而非事物的”，这大概能够帮助 那些愿意的人破除唯物论，走向关系论。 于是，货币的本质是债，是公债；于是，货币是体现某种集体意向性的制度建 构，什么制度呢，记账制度。所以，货币是一本依特定制度而记录的总账。笔 者曾在另一篇文章中表达过，“货币不是任何事物，而是某种事实；这个记录特 定组织范围内公共账务的事实，依赖必要的共识；经常地，人们也称呼该事实 中所临时涉及的某些事物为货币”。 迷人的比特币，从支付出发，建构了一个系统。然而，支付更应该被理解为一 个“原子事实”，而非“系统事实”。比特币预设了“总量为1（21million=1）”，这 也是它对1的发明性的重新定义。在跨系统的并不严密的类比下，法币的增发 被揶揄为“双花”。为杜绝原子级和系统级的双花，以信赖数学为基本信念，比 特币建构了庞大而精密的技术装置。成本是否过于巨大，取决于它在现实社会 中获得了多少记账业务。目前看态势良好，毕竟大部分法币对手太菜，归根到 底，维度太低且手段陈旧，特别是还自带了无法洗脱的抢和偷的原罪。 撇开无中心的比特币等数字货币与强中心的法币间的差别不谈，也撇开双花不 谈。毕竟，双花，不管是否赤裸，终究归属于抢或偷，大多是特殊和例外。“单 2 花”，才是更重要、更一般的原子事实，而其难以摆脱并应该努力摆脱的困境， 是骗。人类的文明史，是从抢，到偷，再到骗的进化过程。当不能抢时才偷， 不能偷时才骗，直到不能骗了，才进入到真正的自由选择。主体被真正的建 立，进行广泛的自由、平等而公平的博弈。 在绝大部分支付事实中，数学当然首先应该也已经被信赖了。由于权重和优先 级问题，对于不管有无中心的记账机构及其所属的记账单位（也就是各种币 啦），一旦选择了，倒是通常没有不相信的必要。此时关键的问题和问题的关键 在于，真正永远不能信赖的是你的对手，不管你是施方还是受方，直到你有理 由开始相信。严格讲，是有理由相信自己的相信。于是，这种对自己的相信， 必然是边际的。 所以说，中本聪的白皮书虽是从支付入手，但它反而搁置了真正的支付问题。 当然这并不是它的任务，它的目标是建立系统，它也确实建成了。 那么，就请跟随笔者，捡起中本聪的遗珠，从同一妙处入手，用尽洪荒之力去 分析，看能否发现是否生成了点什么，会不会就是共钱账户呢？ 这种生成、发现和显化（事实上它就在那里，只是没有被明显化或者说被遮 蔽）， 往小处说，在现实中开些花，在金融史上留个痕，或是可能的；往大处 吹，让天下无骗，那是不可能滴，能减少点便善莫大焉。基本的问题、根本的 问题，也是唯一的问题，是回答自信何以可能。 Salute to Satoshi Nakamoto—be it an individual or a group—who, in the 2008 whitepaper "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System," started from payment but delivered an unprecedented system. Though few chew on Bitcoin's systemic attributes, it is undeniably a system, or at least developed into one by its followers. Devotees revere the whitepaper as a Bible; like the traditional Bible, beyond its narrative and allegorical nature, what inspires people to rely on it is its "totality." Revelations regarding systemicity also extend to the realm of money. Viewing money as a special commodity is a truly archaic textbook view. Those willing to define it by listing its functions are folks who know not what a definition is. Yet, to convincingly answer what money is would likely be no easier than defining "Man" or "the World." The young Wittgenstein once asserted, "The world is the totality of facts, not of things," which might help those willing to discard materialism and move toward relationalism. Thus, the essence of money is debt, public debt; money is an institutional construct reflecting collective intentionality—specifically, a ledger system. Therefore, money is a master ledger recorded according to a specific institution. As I expressed in another article: "Money is not any 'thing,' but a certain 'fact'; this fact of recording public accounting within a specific organization relies on necessary consensus; often, people also refer to certain things temporarily involved in this fact as money." Fascinating Bitcoin started from payment and constructed a system. However, payment should be understood as an "atomic fact" rather than a "systemic fact." Bitcoin preset the "total amount as 1 (21 million = 1)," which is its inventive redefinition of "1." In a loose cross-system analogy, the over-issuance of fiat currency is ridiculed as "double-spending." To eliminate atomic and systemic double-spending, with trust in mathematics as its basic creed, Bitcoin built a massive and sophisticated technical apparatus. Whether the cost is too great depends on how much accounting business it gains in society. Currently, the trend is positive; after all, most fiat rivals are too weak—ultimately having too low a dimension and obsolete means, especially carrying the inescapable original sins of robbery and theft. Putting aside the differences between decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin and highly centralized fiat, and putting aside double-spending—after all, double-spending, naked or otherwise, ultimately belongs to robbery or theft and is mostly exceptional. "Single-spending" is the more important and general atomic fact, and its predicament, from which it struggles to escape, is fraud. The history of human civilization is an evolutionary process from robbery to theft, and then to fraud. When one cannot rob, one steals; when one cannot steal, one cheats; until one cannot cheat, one enters into true free choice. The subject is truly established, engaging in broad, free, equal, and fair gaming. In the vast majority of payment facts, mathematics should certainly be trusted first, and it already is. Due to weight and priority issues, regarding any ledger authority—centralized or not—and its accounting units (various currencies), once chosen, there is usually no need for distrust. At this point, the key problem and the problem's key is that you can truly never trust your counterparty, whether you are the payer or the recipient, until you have a reason to begin believing. Strictly speaking, it is having a reason to believe in your own belief. Thus, this self-belief must be marginal. Thus, while Nakamoto's whitepaper started with payment, it actually set aside the true problem of payment. Of course, this was not its task; its goal was to establish a system, which it indeed accomplished. So, please follow me as I pick up Nakamoto's lost pearl, starting from the same wondrous point and exhausting all efforts to analyze: can we find if something is generated? Could it be the Common Money Account? This generation, discovery, and manifestation (it is actually there, just not made explicit or is obscured)—on a small scale, it might bloom in reality or leave a mark in financial history; on a large scale, claiming to make the world fraud-free is impossible, but reducing it even slightly would be a great blessing. The basic problem, the fundamental problem, and the only problem, is answering how self-confidence is possible.

第一篇 形而上 Part I: Metaphysics

一、 三观、场域和方法论对表 1. Alignment of Worldview, Field, and Methodology

1.1.1 认识、分析、生成、解决，首先需要保证在同一的或者起码可以兼容 的语境内，“三观“成为第一个需要检查和讨论的话题。 1.1.2 迄今人类思想史的进化，有两个明显的向度。一是从集体主义向个人 主义，二是从决定论向怀疑论。为了规避不必要的困扰，仅作对表、不作 深入探讨。1.1.3 怀疑论的个人主义者，可以兼容决定论的个人主义者、怀疑论的集体 主义者、决定论的集体主义者，反向则不能兼容。他们之间，并没有明显 的所谓惊险一跳，而是边际的、平行的、共在的。1.1.4 本文的视角，是个人的和怀疑的，并致力于对个体间关系的把握，避 免沦入所谓后现代的虚无。1.1.5 场域，是语言学名词，本文试图涉猎新的支付语言。个人主义者的场 域，在且仅在人人间。不但独立于其他场域，不从属于其他场域，而且逻 辑上高于它们，只是视它们为背景。 1.1.6 方法论方面，在场域内，就是分析、分析、再分析，看发生了什么； 结合对场域外背景的综合，看能生成什么。 1.1.1 Recognition, analysis, generation, and resolution first require ensuring they occur within the same or at least compatible context; thus, the "Worldview" becomes the first topic for examination and discussion. 1.1.2 The evolution of human intellectual history to date has two distinct dimensions: from collectivism to individualism, and from determinism to skepticism. To avoid unnecessary distraction, I will only align them without deep exploration. 1.1.3 The skeptical individualist can accommodate the deterministic individualist, the skeptical collectivist, and the deterministic collectivist; the reverse is not true. Between them, there is no distinct "perilous leap," but rather they are marginal, parallel, and co-existent. 1.1.4 The perspective of this paper is individualistic and skeptical, dedicated to grasping inter-individual relations while avoiding the abyss of so-called postmodern nihilism. 1.1.5 "Field" is a linguistic term; this paper attempts to explore a new language of payment. The field of the individualist exists in and only in the "between-person" space. It is not only independent of and non-subordinate to other fields, but logically superior to them, viewing them merely as background. 1.1.6 Regarding methodology: inside the field, it is analyze, analyze, and analyze again to see what occurs; combined with the synthesis of the background outside the field, to see what can be generated.

分析地看，人的根本问题（question）是存在；综合地看，人群的一般问题 （problem）是赖帐和逼债。 本文不是解决问题的，而是回答存在的。把 人群射在墙上只看不管，只管人人行不行？这是主旨，或许只是个猜想。 Analyzed analytically, the fundamental "question" for humans is existence; viewed synthetically, the general "problem" for groups is defaulting on debts and debt collection. This paper is not for problem-solving but for answering existence. If we leave the masses aside and only focus on the peer-to-peer relationship, would that work? This is the theme, or perhaps just a conjecture.

二、人与社会、交互与支付 2. Man and Society, Interaction and Payment

1.2.1 当把人设为逻辑起点（也是终点）之后，综合的看，社会似乎是人的 关系的总和；而分析的看，人的关系是人人关系，人人间又是啥关系呢， 社会关系？ 1.2.2 综合的循环定义，是套话、废话，而分析的定义，即便循环（事实上 永远无法避免循环）也是科学的、勉力切近真实的。1.2.3 人，是社会关系的总和。社会关系，是可以被解构为交互关系的。对 交互的再解构，可否就是支付呢？ 1.2.4 如果没有疑义，至此，支付，就取得了人的建构乃至存在、社会的建 构乃至存在的本质性地位（是否本体性，由哲学家回答吧）。 1.2.5 对“应然的支付”的再分析： （对“不然的支付”则无从分析，因为它是断裂的、僵死的） 因支乃付，因付乃支。 子不动我不动，子欲动而我先动。 三流双向，返之于身，边际乃本。 1.2.1 Having set Man as the logical starting point (and end point), viewed synthetically, society seems to be the sum of human relations; yet viewed analytically, human relations are peer-to-peer relations. And what relations exist between peers? Social relations? 1.2.2 Synthetic circular definitions are clichés and nonsense, whereas analytical definitions—even if circular (which is practically unavoidable)—are scientific and strive to approach the truth. 1.2.3 Man is the sum of social relations. Social relations can be deconstructed into interaction relations. Can the further deconstruction of interaction be payment? 1.2.4 If there is no dispute, then at this point, payment acquires an essential status in the construction and even existence of Man and Society (whether it is ontological, let philosophers answer). 1.2.5 Further analysis of "payment as it should be" (there is no way to analyze "payment as it is not," for it is fractured and dead): Pay because of support, support because of pay. You don't move, I don't move; you are about to move, I move first. Three flows in two directions, returning to the self; marginality is the essence.

三流者， 币流、信息流、物流。 向内看支付，自有一套6W1H(who,whose, why, where,when,what,how），在 相当意义和程度上，彰显了人的自洽和自足。从支付向外看，会看到到另 一套6W1H，无数断点等待连接，信的概念被引入以实现虚构；而祛（他 妈的）信才是自由之路（唯留信于逻辑以及更高维的上帝）。 The three flows are: Currency Flow, Information Flow, and Logistics Flow. Looking inward at payment, there is a set of 6W1H (who, whose, why, where, when, what, how), which significantly manifests human self-consistency and self-sufficiency. Looking outward from payment, one sees another set of 6W1H, countless breakpoints waiting to be connected; the concept of "Trust" is introduced to achieve fiction; yet "De-Trusting" (damn it) is the path to freedom (leaving trust only to logic and a higher-dimensional God).

三、 第三者生成 3. Generation of the Third Party

1.3.1 一人为私，两人为共。两，即为共之充分必要， 多则生乱生恶。 1.3.2 每一种两两关系，可有应有一个公共账户，作为缓存、表达信任、协 助实现。 1.3.3 至大的人与人（甲和乙），一人多点，其相关的两点（A与B），每个 点之至小的一阳一阴，合体为“第三”、“共三”。 A点施予B点接受，阳施予而阴接受。阳应该施、愿意施，而A主施予； 阴应该受、愿意受，而B主接受。循环往复，授受乃成。1.3.4 这里的第三者，并不是从天而降的，也不是独自成立的，而是由AB 的特定关系生成的，是内生的。 1.3.5 而关于它是否可以外在、如何外在，正是本文的主旨。在支付范畴 内，它就是一个“共钱账户”。 1.3.1 One person constitutes privacy; two people constitute "Common." Two is the necessary and sufficient condition for commonality; more leads to chaos and evil. 1.3.2 Every pair-relationship should have a common account as a buffer to express trust and assist realization. 1.3.3 For the greatest of Man and Man (A and B), one person with multiple points, and their two relevant points (A and B), the smallest Yang and Yin of each point merge into the "Third" or "Common Third." Point A gives and Point B receives; Yang gives and Yin receives. Yang should and is willing to give, and A leads the giving; Yin should and is willing to receive, and B leads the receiving. In a cycle, giving and receiving are accomplished. 1.3.4 The third party here is not a deus ex machina but is endogenously generated by the specific relationship between A and B. 1.3.5 How it can be externalized is the theme of this paper. In the realm of payment, it is a "Common Money Account."

绝对的自我并不能实现自足和自洽，只能是虚无的或僵死的。内生并不断 扩展的第三者，本体上，使得自我成立；功能上，使得自我灵动。 骚情地说，共钱账户里流动的是互爱。钱，从债，追究到爱，一定是有阳性的；法币的中性，只能是号称。 The absolute self cannot achieve self-sufficiency or self-consistency; it can only be nihilistic or stagnant. The endogenous and ever-expanding third party, ontologically, allows the self to be established; functionally, it allows the self to be agile. To put it poetically, what flows in the Common Money Account is mutual love. Money, from debt to account to love, must be masculine (Yang); the neutrality of fiat currency is merely a claim.

四、支付的边际性 4. The Marginality of Payment

1.4.1 当共钱账户这个第三者载体被引入（并非发明，而是分析使之显 现），所有的支付都应呈现出边际性。 1.4.2 所谓银货两讫只是例外的大颗粒，也可以说是内在的小颗粒。1.4.3 支付具有波粒二象性。 有始有终似粒，无始无终如波，对应于AB交 互关系的属性。1.4.4 支付流和流支付，才是点对点支付的一般性状。 1.4.1 When the CMA is introduced as a third-party carrier (not invented, but revealed by analysis), all payments should exhibit marginality. 1.4.2 The so-called "payment upon delivery" is merely an exceptional large particle, or one might say, an inherent small particle. 1.4.3 Payment possesses wave-particle duality. It is particle-like with a beginning and end, and wave-like when continuous, corresponding to the attributes of the A-B interaction. 1.4.4 Payment flow and fluidic payment are the general traits of P2P payment.

边际的主要意义，是实现特定情境内的实时均衡。均衡即正义，该价值视 角的转换说起来话多且长，可以重述一切。 The primary meaning of marginality is to achieve real-time equilibrium within a specific context. Equilibrium is Justice; the shift of this value perspective is a long story that could restate everything.

第二篇 形而下 Part II: Physics (The Practical)

一、共钱 1. Common Money

2.1.1 共钱账户，是特定两人间特定关系的记账和支付机制。 2.1.2 这种装置，特别是纯粹的那种，迄今并未具体存在，而处在自然的、 可被规制的状态。 2.1.3 共钱，就是共钱账户内的钱，其品种是首先要被规制的。2.1.4 每种法币都是一本大公账。人人间的一般场域，所涉及的共钱，取某 种法币为记账载体是便利的。共钱也可取无中心的数字货币为载体，取决 于场景和需求。 2.1.1 The CMA is a ledger and payment mechanism for a specific relationship between two specific people. 2.1.2 Such a device, especially a pure one, has not existed concretely to date but remains in a natural, regulatable state. 2.1.3 Common Money is the money within a CMA; its variety is the first thing to be regulated. 2.1.4 Every fiat currency is a great public ledger. In the general field between peers, it is convenient to use a certain fiat currency as the ledger carrier for Common Money. Common Money can also use decentralized digital currency as its carrier, depending on the scenario and needs.

二、账户之约 2. Account Covenant

2.2.1 账户的本质，是一组契约及其执行。 2.2.2 该契约最大的外部需要只是托管，而无需监管。 2.2.3 关键条款示意和例举： 甲取其一点，其特定的法币账户A；乙取其一点，其特定的法币账 户B。在受托服务方的特定装置中，生成唯一共钱账户。 7 单向共钱： 1、一般约定。A点至共帐、共账至B点为钱流的限制路径。。 2、个性约定。比如，设定共帐额度，超额则流向B点。支付计划按期或按 笔自动执行，仅支持不利于A方的更改。 双向共钱： 1、 两个单向共钱账户为基础。 2、 支持多点复杂控制的智能合约。 2.2.1 The essence of an account is a set of contracts and their execution. 2.2.2 Its greatest external need is custody, not regulation. 2.2.3 Illustration of key terms: A takes one of its points, its specific fiat account A; B takes one of its points, its specific fiat account B. In a specific device of the custodian service provider, a unique CMA is generated. Unidirectional Common Money: 1. General agreement. The restricted path for money flow is Point A to CMA, and CMA to Point B. 2. Personal agreement. For example, setting a CMA limit, with excess flowing to Point B. Payment plans execute automatically by period or per transaction, only supporting changes disadvantageous to Party A. Bilateral Common Money: 1. Based on two unidirectional CMAs. 2. Smart contracts supporting multi-point complex control.

三、场景 3. Scenarios

2.3.1 既然支付是人和社会的建构关系和关系建构的本质性（甚至本体性） 要素，那么所有的场景都可以说是由支付展开的，彻底地说，由共钱账户 的边际支付展开。 2.3.2 便于理解的分类，虽粗糙拙劣，可以是消费型场景、博弈型场景和生 活型场景。 一包瓜子模型，单向共钱（例如，一个疗程海参，长期餐饮） 抛硬币模型，双向共钱（例如，连续保险，各种投资） intercourse 模型，单向或双向（例如，互养、赡养、抚养等亲亲关系，类 亲亲的长期交往） 2.3.3 那些“反共钱”场景（可以统称为赖账或逼债）更加宏阔，表现为“旱的 时候旱死涝的时候涝死”。只需理解无需解决，事实上，“不可能解决”也是被逻辑限定的。 2.3.4 共钱账户支撑下的边际支付所构建的场景，是一种永生场景，这又是一种极大与极小的共生，被数学和逻辑支持的。 2.3.1 Since payment is an essential (even ontological) element of the constructive relationship between Man and Society, all scenarios can be said to unfold from payment—thoroughly speaking, from the marginal payment of the CMA. 2.3.2 Categories for easier understanding, though crude, could be consumption, gaming, and lifestyle scenarios. Bag of Seeds Model: Unidirectional CMA (e.g., a course of sea cucumbers, long-term dining). Coin Toss Model: Bilateral CMA (e.g., continuous insurance, various investments). Intercourse Model: Unidirectional or bilateral (e.g., mutual support, alimony, child support, and other kinship or kinship-like long-term interactions). 2.3.3 Those "Anti-Common-Money" scenarios (collectively termed defaulting or debt collection) are even broader, manifesting as "drought in one place, flood in another." These require understanding rather than resolution; in fact, being "impossible to solve" is logically constrained. 2.3.4 The scenario built by marginal payment supported by the CMA is a perpetual scenario, a symbiosis of the macroscopic and the microscopic, supported by mathematics and logic.

四、利益 4. Interests

2.4.1 再度形而上，人人间的关系抽象为共钱账户关系，根本的利益，是人 的存在被确认，以共在确认存在。 2.4.2 更容易度量的利益，可通过与现存的非共钱甚至反共钱场景的框架 比对来理解。 2.4.3 更明确的私人产权状态，更低占比的交易成本，以更小的颗粒流转 消除租值消散和扩大交互可能。 2.4.4 更强的确定性，更小的最低信任需求，将某些甚至大部分庞大的第 三方转化为最小的第三者托管方，实时出清点对点关系。 2.4.5 呼唤第三者托管方开始出现、更多涌现，竞争上岗，服务于“大写的 人“。 2.4.1 Metaphysically again, peer-to-peer relations are abstracted into CMA relations; the fundamental interest is the confirmation of human existence—confirming "Being" through "Co-being." 2.4.2 Measurable interests can be understood by comparing the framework with existing non-CMA or even anti-CMA scenarios. 2.4.3 Clearer private property status, lower transaction costs, and smaller granularity of flow to eliminate rent dissipation and expand interaction possibilities. 2.4.4 Greater certainty and minimal trust requirements transform some or even most massive third parties into minimal third-party custodians, clearing peer-to-peer relations in real-time. 2.4.5 Calling for the emergence of third-party custodians to serve the "Individual with a Capital I."

第三篇 第三者所在 Part III: Where the Third Party Resides

一、 新维度公共场所 1. A New Dimension of Public Space

3.1.1 作为第三者的共钱账户，处在一个隐藏的维度，在人们通常认知的 四维时空之外之内之上之下。 3.1.2 共钱账户的有形显现，依托于托管方可能会更便利。对传统的各种 第三方托管机构的理解，有助于理解这个新的公共场所。 3.1.3 根本性的差异在于，能否以及是否尽最大可能保持被动。 3.1.4 广场内，除了一套迎合性的规则，一无所有。 3.1.5 该广场，不排除隐藏于常见和传统场所之内，甚或是必然的。 3.1.1 As a third party, the CMA resides in a hidden dimension—beyond, within, above, and below the four-dimensional spacetime we usually perceive. 3.1.2 The physical manifestation of the CMA might be more convenient through a custodian. Understanding various traditional third-party custodians helps in understanding this new public space. 3.1.3 The fundamental difference lies in whether it can and does remain as passive as possible. 3.1.4 Inside the plaza, there is nothing except a set of accommodating rules. 3.1.5 This plaza is likely, perhaps necessarily, hidden within common and traditional spaces.

二、 规则和伦理 2. Rules and Ethics

3.2.1 为了适应人而设计，优先于为了解决问题而设计（天下本无事，一 定要说有，只是“旱的时候旱死、涝的时候涝死”）； 3.2.2 若非必要勿增实体，若增实体务增最小 3.3.3 最小颗粒、可永动的流化原则 3.2.1 Designed to adapt to humans, prioritized over being designed to solve problems (The world is inherently untroubled; to insist it is, is merely "drought in one place, flood in another"); 3.2.2 Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity; if added, they must be minimal; 3.3.3 The principle of minimal granularity and perpetual fluidization.

三、 建设规划 系统还是插件儿，这是个问题 3. Construction Plan: System or Plug-in, that is the question

四、涉及商业的计划 （开放的，留白先） 4. Business-related Plans (Open, left blank for now)

随想 Random Thoughts

BVB 解析：Bit versus Bit，最小的分形，美在最小处 反向乌托邦：更平滑所以更丰富，于是更幸福 阴沟里有生态，地狱里有交易 就让BVB做个中吧，你我亲自做个人 BVB Analysis: Bit versus Bit, the minimal fractal; beauty lies in the smallest part. Reverse Utopia: Smoother, thus richer, and therefore happier. There is an ecology in the gutters; there are transactions in hell. Let BVB be the Medium; you and I shall personally be Human.

---

第三部分：历史底稿二（2025 年冬）

Part III: Historical Manuscript II (Winter 2025)

《TUTS：BVB 事业计划之一》 "TUTS: A BVB Business Plan"

“...宗旨：均衡即正义，平静即幸福... 引入‘债粒’与‘债波’的概念... 尝试为个人提供熨平债波的工具... 提到通过信息流、交付流、支付流的三路分离来实现逻辑的必然...” "...Objective: Equilibrium is Justice, Tranquility is Happiness... introducing concepts of 'Debt-Particle' and 'Debt-Wave'... attempting to provide individuals with tools to smooth out debt-waves... mentioning achieving logical necessity through the triple separation of information flow, delivery flow, and payment flow..."

To be or not to be, it is a question. Being answered. To you or to not you (maybe Satoshi), it is a problem. Being dealt with. 在，或不在，是个问题，回答中； 给你，或给非你（也许中本聪），是个问题，处理中。 To be or not to be, it is a question. Being answered. To you or to not you (maybe Satoshi), it is a problem. Being dealt with. Being, or not being, is a question, in answer; To you, or not to you (maybe Satoshi), is a problem, in treatment.

在《BVB：一种点对点边际支付的共钱账户》一文中，从本体论、存在论的意 义上，分析了人人间的支付关系，揭示了一个共钱账户的隐维概念，而对依此 可展开的事业计划做了留白，本文将勉力构建一个。 In the paper "BVB: A Common Money Account for P2P Marginal Payment," the payment relationship between individuals was analyzed in an ontological and existential sense, revealing the hidden-dimension concept of a Common Money Account; while the business plan based on this was left blank, this paper will strive to construct one.

一、 宗旨 1. Objective

均衡即正义，平静即幸福。 神曰，没有义人，一个也没有。是人，就难免有亏欠，同时，也有被亏欠。是 为债，源于欲、源于爱；债的“超然”波动，导向情与仇。 个人主义视角，人人间关系的本质是债（而集体与集体间，集体与个人间的关 系是没有本质的，对其相机理解和处理，不在本文讨论范围内）。 世界是均衡的，永恒的。对均衡的理解和认知，是人的基本美感力。 制造或熨平波动，是人的行为的两大基本取向。后者大概是幸福之路。There is no way to happiness, happiness is the way. 为个人熨平其“债波”提供原子级的工具和方法，是本计划的使命。 Equilibrium is Justice, Tranquility is Happiness. God said, there is no righteous man, not even one. As humans, we inevitably owe, and are owed. This is "Debt," originating from desire and love; the "transcendental" fluctuations of debt lead to passion and vendetta. From an individualistic perspective, the essence of relations between peers is debt (whereas relations between collectives or between collective and individual have no essence; their understanding is outside this discussion). The world is in equilibrium, eternal. Understanding and perceiving equilibrium is a basic aesthetic power of Man. Creating or smoothing fluctuations are the two basic orientations of human behavior. The latter is likely the path to happiness. There is no way to happiness, happiness is the way. The mission of this plan is to provide atomic tools and methods for individuals to smooth out their "Debt-Waves."

二、 概念 2. Concepts

强调下范畴，个人主义语境下递进的三级，是人对人的，是点对点的，是一阳 对一阴的；强调下方法，是分析的而不是综合的，是均衡的而不是辩证的，是 边际的而不是革命的，是保守的而不是激进的，保守传统、保守独立和自由。 债波，是本文的核心概念，指点点间对于债的共识的不确定。债是中性的，甚 至是良性的（基于其构成人的本质性、本位性），而债波是恶性的，是微观的不 均衡与不正义，演绎和演化可得一切苦楚。 To emphasize the category: the three progressive levels in an individualistic context are person-to-person, peer-to-peer, and Yang-to-Yin; to emphasize the method: it is analytical rather than synthetic, equilibrium-based rather than dialectical, marginal rather than revolutionary, and conservative rather than radical—conserving tradition, conserving independence, and freedom. "Debt-Wave" is the core concept of this paper, referring to the uncertainty regarding the consensus of debt between peers. Debt is neutral, even benign (based on its essential role in constituting Man), while the "Debt-Wave" is malignant—a microscopic imbalance and injustice, from which all suffering is deduced and evolved.

三、 样本 3. Sample

甲以一元（100 分）钱购买乙的一把（100 粒）瓜子，是一个可以全面表达债 波的样本。如此细小，通过放大、类比和演绎，可以描述接近全部的人类社会 中人人间的自由交互。 债的缘起，是甲以一元钱获得一包“合意”瓜子和乙以一包瓜子获得一元“全”且 “真”钱的意志偶合 。债，承接了对“合意”和“全真”的期望。 这里，再引申一个债波的附属概念，债粒，债粒运动构成债波。债的颗粒度， 是由双方隐性或显性达成的。大颗粒大波动，小颗粒小波动，细密度受制于技 术和成本。在样本中，最小对应相关于一分钱 and 一粒瓜子。 一个小孩，攥着一把分币，站在一个卖瓜子的货郎前。此时此空，这便是全世 界唯一的一件事……历史不可更改，未来等待规划，一切只是当下，正在分析着 展开…… （有些问题或许需要追问一下，钱是什么？何谓真？“真”是主观的还是客观的？ 在此假设不需要回答和解决，反正这俩人并不追问。） 总有一人要先行支付或交付，最小也要一分一粒，债便形成了。凡债就有不确 定性，表现为偏离“严格共识”（甲知道乙知道甲知道乙知道……同时乙知道甲知 道乙知道甲知道……） 事实上，货郎并不知道这包（甚至那粒）瓜子是否合小孩的意，小孩也并不知 道那把（这分）钱是否符合货郎的真钱要求，即便无比自信，也不能确信。此 时此空，这便是全世界唯一的一件事的最重要属性，那就是不确定（风险）。 Subject A buying a handful (100 grains) of seeds from Subject B for one yuan (100 cents) is a sample that can fully express the Debt-Wave. Though small, through magnification and deduction, it can describe nearly all free human interactions in society. The origin of the debt is the coincidence of wills: A obtaining a "satisfactory" bag of seeds for one yuan, and B obtaining one "complete" and "real" yuan. Debt carries the expectations of "satisfaction" and "authenticity." Here, I derive the subsidiary concept: the Debt-Particle. Its movements constitute Debt-Waves. The granularity of debt is reached implicitly or explicitly. Large particles cause large fluctuations; small particles cause small ones. In this sample, the minimum is one cent and one seed. A child with coins before a vendor—this is the only thing in the world... history is unchangeable; the future awaits planning; everything is just the "Now," unfolding analytically. (One might ask: What is money? What is "Real"? Is "Real" subjective or objective? We assume no need to answer.) One must pay first; even at "one cent, one seed," debt is formed. All debt has uncertainty—a deviation from "Strict Consensus." In truth, the vendor doesn't know if the seeds satisfy, and the child doesn't know if the money is "real." This space-time's most important attribute is uncertainty (risk).

四、 语境 4. Context

在中心化世界里，无数的主体和装置以及规则（包括有关在此可以暂时搁置的 真钱问题）被创设出来，企图消除这个不确定。仅以主体举例，包括各种中介、 各种媒体、各种检测和评测（从产品到人）、各种各级监管（从行业到市场到公 检法直到国家暴力）。不确定最多只是被部分转移而不能消除，同时生产了更多 更多…… 在独立自由平等的场景，“一分一粒”的不确定，就是根本的也是终极的风险。 彻底躲避它，就无以建构二人世界，也就沦入了虚无。 有三，方生万物，“第三”被召唤。 向外求，逻辑上不能成立（无二何以三，不信第二何以信第三）。除非接受“独 立自由平等三角不可能”，也就接受了自己被“物化”；或者，引入了“信任”，信 任各种各级强权（包括文化），典型的是终极地抽象地（甚或临时地具体地） “信上帝”。 中心化世界依此被建立，其中至大者是“地球村”、“人类命运共同体”，居中的是 各种政体的国家，较小的是帮派、公司（合伙）以及家庭等，有中心有信任有 名头，纵横交错，美轮美奂。 （中心化的）集体主义的语境，自来也将永远是现实，虽然其从来也不是“事 实”，更不是不可分割的“原子事实”，特别对于纯粹的个人主义者而言。只要他 想存在，特别是共在于他者，他必须内求，关键的是，“和他者且仅和一个他者 一起”，构成了人对人，其实是点对点（PvP），本质是位对位（BvB）。（ “小男 孩对货郎”与“一块钱对一包瓜子”与“一分一粒”）。 向内求，面对这“一分一粒”的债粒与债波，第三主体（其实只是载体）被呼唤 来承载和处理它们。是不是，或者可不可以，是“共钱账户”呢？ In a centralized world, countless apparatuses are created to eliminate uncertainty—intermediaries, media, regulators, state violence. Uncertainty is only transferred, not eliminated. In an independent, free scene, the uncertainty of "one cent, one grain" is the ultimate risk. To avoid it is to fall into nihilism. "The Third" is summoned. Seeking outward is logically impossible (without two, how can there be three?). Unless one accepts the "Impossibility of the Independent/Free/Equal Triangle" and becomes "objectified," or introduces "Trust" in authorities or God. The centralized world is built this way—Village, State, Gang, Family—intertwined and magnificent. Collectivism will always be a reality, though never a "fact," and certainly not an "atomic fact" for the pure individualist. To exist, he must seek inward; "with another and only one another" constitutes PvP, essentially Bit-versus-Bit (BvB). Seeking inward, for these "one cent, one grain" Debt-Particles and Debt-Waves, the third subject (carrier) is summoned. Could it be the "Common Money Account"?

五、 机制 5. Mechanism

“一元买一包”是个“原子事实”。它是个目标，仍然也当然是个系统。它是由 100 个不可再分割的“一分买一粒”的线程依序构成，但并不是简单重复和加总，且随时可中止（当然也可以自然延续）于双方的自由选择。 再小的债粒，也必有债波，导致不均衡（外在的不平静和痛苦根源）。 在我们熟悉的中心化世界里，“一元买一包”，即便化约为“一分买一粒”，也是有 着显性或隐形的契约来支持的，而支持契约的，更是小到帮派暴力大到上帝信 仰。在 Geek 们想象的无中心世界，合约的智能化，更多是有关成本效率的维 度，而更重要的，似乎应更专注实现其自治与自足性（没有监管没有审判、没 有违约没有外部性，也就没有纠纷和苦楚）。 暂时撇开智能，它只是对某线程的重复。线程到底是什么？两点是否能构成一 线？如果不能，那如何方能？途经的第三点到底是个啥？！ 此处，我再度片面化地分析“一分买一粒”为“一分钱从 A 点到 B 点”的“支付”和 “一粒瓜子从 B 处到 A 处”的“交付”，然后，只考察“支付”的部分，而将交付视 为支付的因果而悬置（事实上，交付更为开放，可以也必须悬置。分裂二者的 意义重大，是摆脱中心桎梏的根本必要，也是通往真切的必经之路）。（至此， 支付也就取得了“人”的本体地位，人，特别是社会人，就是同时作为支付者和 收受者而存在。） 这二人之二点究竟其极限，能内生一个什么样的第三点呢？假设已经存在（或 者被第三只手设置）唯一的一个第三点，1、钱可以由A发起从A点到AB均可 见的第三点；2、A 可以决定钱从第三点到 B 点：3、钱的另外唯一去处就是做 了献祭（比如给神或中本聪或者人民等等）。（此即为另文中的“单向共钱”，而 “双向共钱”是“单向共钱”的重复和互动，此不赘述）。 再次强调，这个第三点是内生的，不具备任何对应二人外部之主体的独立地位。 如此，则整个二人二点世界就宁静了，或者说就可以宁静了。 "One yuan for one bag" is an atomic fact and a system of 100 "one cent for one grain" threads. Even small particles have Debt-Waves causing imbalance. In a Geek's decentralized world, smart contracts should focus on autonomy—no trials, no externalities, no suffering. What is the third point on the line between two points? I analyze "one cent for one grain" as "payment" (A to B) and "delivery" (B to A), and suspend delivery. Payment thus attains the status of human ontology. What third point is endogenously generated at the limit of these two? 1. Money from A to the third point; 2. A decides if it moves to B; 3. The only other destination is Sacrifice (to Satoshi, etc.). This third point is endogenous, with no independent status outside the two. Thus, the world of two becomes tranquil.

六、 改良 6. Improvement

通过显化“共钱账户”及其机制，一切交易都可以被改良。（判断是否改良，又涉 及到根本的善恶标准，此文当然取均衡和平静为善，而视翻江倒海等宏大叙事 为恶）。 严格说，一切点对点或者可以约化或转化为点对点的交易可以被改良。 1、 确定点对点交易（包括约化或转化为）； 2、 分离交易为支付流、交付流和信息流； 3、 确定点与点账户，生成第三点共钱账户，制定（选定）共钱流转机制； 4、 以支付流为主线程、交付流和信息流为辅助配合，制定（选定）交易机制。 该交易的特征是随时接近绝对均衡的，是有始无终的，是可以永续的，所以是 改良的。 交易者是接近绝对自由的，只需对自己做最小负责，处理可控的自我债波，所 以是改良的。 By manifesting the CMA, all transactions can be improved (defining "Good" as equilibrium and "Evil" as grand narratives). 1. Identify P2P transactions; 2. Separate flows: Payment, Delivery, Information; 3. Generate the third-point CMA; 4. Use Payment as the main thread. Such transactions are always near equilibrium, continuous, and perpetual—therefore improved. Traders are free, responsible only for their own controllable Debt-Waves.

七、 举例 7. Examples

样本是通用的钥匙，而举例是各种待开启的锁。 黄（延伸至各种服务）、毒（延伸至各种商品）、赌（延伸至各种 EV），是三个 方向，也是三个类别（虽有强行综合之嫌），也是三个文明级别（虽有强行判断 之嫌）。在此各举一例。 三者共同的困难，都是不得不引入第三方，从而无法避免各种乱入。 1、 服务：比如，信息流约定面金和吹拉弹唱四个阶段服务费用。首先，面金 从A到第三点共钱账户，面试后A发动面金从共钱账户到B，再发动每十分 钟向共钱账户发送一次费用（可设定每笔新费发送时同时确认前笔从共钱账 户到 B）。自然完成，或随时中止，未确认到 B 的部分留存或自动转发给中 本聪（除非是比特币，如何转发中本聪是留存的小问题）。 2、 商品：比如，信息流约定先试后付，不设明确中止。首先，尝过商品后，A 发动货款到共钱账户，B发送商品至A，使用后A确认共钱账户到B。循环 往复，期间，可通过信息流讨论感受、调整价格（数量）和质量等。直到超 过某沉默期，留存在共钱账户的部分自动转发中本聪。 3、 对赌：比如，信息流约定标的为之后某时的某股票指数并约定支付方式。 根据某支付方式，A 分若干笔向 AB 向的共钱户打入下注金（及若干笔履约 保证金即奖励金），B分若干笔向BA向的共钱账户打入下注金（及若干笔履 约保证金即奖励金）。结果确认后，双方依据约定顺序逐笔确认共钱账户的 钱到对方（其中，输方需在每笔收到后将对方的下注金打回并留下履约奖励 金）。自然完成，或随时中止，未确认的部分留存或自动转发给中本聪。 Services, Goods, and Betting—all suffer from third-party intrusion. 1. Service: A sends fees to CMA; after "interview," A releases to B, then sends fees every 10 mins. Unconfirmed parts are sacrificed to Satoshi. 2. Goods: Try-before-you-buy. A sends to CMA, B delivers, A releases after use. After a silence period, remnants go to Satoshi. 3. Betting: Both deposit stakes into CMAs. After the result, they confirm transfers sequentially. Unconfirmed parts go to Satoshi.

八、 需求 8. Needs

分析至此，对一个人来讲，实现点对点交易的真正的外在需求到底是什么，应 该已经显现，那就是共钱账户；内在的需求到底是什么，就是对自己的信任， 信任自己选择的是“值得以最小代价验证是否秉持基本理性的对手”。 迄今为止，显性的外在的第三点共钱账户并不存在，起码没有纯粹的，即便有 能够实现其功能的装置，也多半掺杂了另外的私货。（ 目光所限，笔者能发现的 现实世界中唯一接近完美体现共钱账户的，就是德州扑克游戏中的“底池”）。 始于比特币区块链的各种模仿和发展，基于总账变更验证确认的目标，在涉及 支付的线程中，其设计思想和技术路线，为提供共钱账户提供了可能和准备。 或许已经有了一些萌芽，但大概囿于其价值观和功能取向，并未真正显现。 点对点间，只需要一个点。本来，它就在那里，如果没有，也就没有点对点； 人与人也一直在寻找并在妥协中托付，却也经常被伤害；如何能够更明确它是 谁，并使得它能够更方便地在那里，且更明确的工作，这就是社会的发展、人 的发展从隐性到越来越显性的新需求。 当然，这是坐井观天的笔者所认为的。 The external need is the CMA; the internal need is self-confidence—trusting one's choice of opponent. Pure CMAs don't exist yet, except perhaps the "Pot" in Poker. Bitcoin opened the way for CMA design, but its values focus elsewhere. Between peers, only one point is needed. It was always there. Making it explicit and convenient is the new demand for human development.

九、 行动 9. Action

路线是多元而开放的。 比如说，一家数字货币钱包供应商或者一条支付公链服务商从根本（存在论、 价值观和方法论意义）上认同点点交互对内生第三点的需求，并愿意满足之， 就可以开始工作了。 然后，就自然有自然的然后。 The path is open. If a provider agrees with the need for the endogenous third point, work can begin. Then, there will naturally be a "natural then."

---