Financial trust funds have long been a pillar of asset management, offering structured fiduciary services to safeguard and administer assets. Their role is particularly crucial in emerging economies, where traditional financial systems impose bureaucratic and cost-heavy burdens that hinder businesses from scaling at the speed demanded by today’s global markets. Historically, trust funds have depended on multiple intermediaries, leading to inefficiencies, high operational costs, and limited accessibility. However, the emergence of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and blockchain offers a paradigm shift, introducing unprecedented levels of transparency, automation, and security to trust fund management, ultimately redefining how assets are structured, protected, and transferred.

Blockchain technology offers a decentralized framework that reduces reliance on intermediaries, ensures immutable record-keeping, and automates administrative processes through smart contracts. This shift signifies a paradigm change in how financial trust funds operate, enhancing accessibility and liquidity while addressing compliance and regulatory concerns.

Trust funds are crucial in emerging markets, especially in Latin America, supporting infrastructure development, real estate investment, financial inclusion, and asset protection. Governments and private investors use trust funds or fideicomisos, as known in Spanish to finance big infrastructure projects like highways and renewable energy, ensuring funding security and transparency. In real estate, trusts enable foreign investment and structured property ownership, particularly in Mexico and Brazil. They also serve as wealth protection tools, helping businesses and families shield assets from economic instability and inflation. Pension funds in countries like Argentina and Peru rely on trust structures to manage workers’ contributions securely.

In corporate finance, trusts enhance investor confidence by ensuring transparency in debt issuance and structured finance. However, regulatory fragmentation and high costs limit accessibility, while governance risks remain a challenge. Here, blockchain comes into play improving efficiency, security, and transparency, paving the way for a more accessible and digitized trust fund ecosystem in the region.

How Big is the Trust Fund Market?

According to Business Research Insights, the global custody and trust services market was valued at approximately USD 5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 10 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 8% . This growth is driven by increasing global financial services, the complexity of financial assets, and the rising demand for secure asset management solutions. Services in this market encompass the safekeeping of securities, cash, and other investments, as well as functions like investment management and compliance with legal requirements.

As of 2023, data from the Fideicomisos Latin American Committee of the Latin American Banking Federation (FELABAN) reported 222 Trust Fund Management Companies overseeing $338.7 billion in fiduciary assets, with 82% originating from private sources. The total number of fiduciary contracts reached 224,452, of which 80.8% were guaranteed administration trust funds.

II. The Problem: Where Tradicional Trust Fund Management Falls Short

1. High Operational Costs: Trust funds rely on multiple intermediaries to manage assets and ensure compliance. While these intermediaries provide essential oversight and legal protection, their involvement significantly increases administrative costs, ultimately reducing net returns for beneficiaries and trustees. Fees for legal structuring, auditing, and financial advisory services create an expensive burden on both trustees and fund participants.

2. Opaque Structures: A fundamental issue with traditional trust funds is the lack of real-time transparency, which fosters inefficiencies and mistrust among beneficiaries. Typically, beneficiaries must rely on periodic reports or trustee communications to gain insights into fund performance and asset distribution. These reports often lack granular, real-time financial data, making it difficult for stakeholders to track transactions or asset valuations efficiently. In addition, reporting mechanisms tend to be complex, fragmented, and inconsistent across different financial institutions.

3. Slow Processes & Legal Friction: Traditional trust funds operate within rigid bureaucratic frameworks, often requiring extensive paperwork and multiple layers of approval. Manual processes dominate trust administration, from fund set up to beneficiary payouts and asset transfers, leading to inefficiencies that hinder liquidity and accessibility, especially in cross-border transactions. In emerging economies, these challenges are further compounded by complex regulatory and contractual frameworks; thus, increasing legal friction and slowing operations. Additionally, the reliance on physical paperwork, notarized approvals, and manual processing heightens the risk of administrative errors, fraud, and significant delays in executing financial decisions.

4. Regulatory Constraints: Operating trust funds across different jurisdictions presents significant regulatory challenges, as each country has its own set of legal and financial requirements. Regulatory fragmentation makes compliance a costly and complicated task, requiring trust administrators to navigate multiple legal frameworks, tax codes, and reporting standards.

III. How Trust Funds Win From Blockchain?

The integration of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) is transforming trust fund management by enhancing transparency, automation, and security. These innovations address inefficiencies in asset management, regulatory compliance, and cross-border transactions while unlocking new financial opportunities. Key transformations shaping this evolution include:

1. Smart Contracts & Automation: Automated processes are redefining trust fund management by streamlining financial transactions, reducing administrative burdens, and strengthening regulatory compliance. Through automated transactions, smart contracts execute fund distributions, compliance verifications, and beneficiary payouts instantly, eliminating intermediaries and minimizing delays. This automation significantly lowers administrative overhead by removing manual processing, cutting operational costs, and reducing human errors. Equally important, smart contracts enable programmable compliance by embedding legal and regulatory conditions directly into the code, ensuring seamless adherence to jurisdictional requirements.

2. Transparency & Auditability: Enhanced transparency, security, and accountability are now possible through immutable records, real-time data access, and fraud prevention mechanisms. With tamper-proof record-keeping, every transaction is securely stored on a decentralized ledger, ensuring that trust activities remain verifiable and auditable at all times. This transparency extends to beneficiaries, who can access real-time fund performance data, eliminating the need for periodic reports and reducing disputes. Furthermore, a decentralized structure mitigates fraud risks by preventing unauthorized asset transfers, mismanagement, and financial misconduct.

3. Tokenization of Assets: Increased liquidity, potential advantages in fractional ownership, and broader accessibility to financial markets are key innovations improving trust fund investments. Tokenization allows trust fund assets, such as real estate, equities, and alternative investments, to be divided into smaller, tradable units, facilitating fractional ownership and expanding investment opportunities. This innovation also enhances liquidity, as tokenized assets can be bought and sold in secondary markets, enabling beneficiaries to exit their positions more efficiently than traditional trust structures. Additionally, access to investment opportunities is democratized, making previously exclusive assets available to a broader range of investors rather than being limited to high-net-worth individuals.

4. Cross-Border Efficiency: Seamless transactions, standardized compliance, and reduced settlement costs have significantly improved cross-border trust fund operations. Smart contracts enable global financial interactions without reliance on traditional systems or intermediaries, ensuring faster and more efficient international transactions. Additionally, transparency and programmability simplify regulatory compliance, allowing trust funds to adhere to multiple legal frameworks without redundant processes. This automation also results in cost-effective settlements, significantly lowering legal costs, verification, and cross-border fund transfers.

IV. Going Deeper into DeFi: Are Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) the Future of Trust Funds?

The rapid advancement of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and blockchain technology has ignited debates about the future of trust fund management. Some innovators argue that trust funds will be entirely replaced by decentralized entities, while others believe that traditional trust structures will integrate DLT technologies into their operational models. At the core of this discussion are Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), which provide an automated, transparent, and community-driven alternative to conventional fiduciary frameworks. But can DAOs fully replace traditional trust funds, or will they emerge as a complementary innovation within the financial landscape?

How DAOs are reshaping the landscape

1. Automation and Smart Contracts Removing Intermediaries: Traditional trust funds rely on trustees, custodians, and legal professionals to manage and distribute assets. DAOs, on the other hand, function through smart contracts, automating these tasks and eliminating the need for intermediaries. This shift can lead to lower administrative costs, faster fund execution, and more transparent governance.For example, instead of waiting for a trustee’s approval to release funds to a beneficiary, a smart contract within a DAO could execute this action instantly based on predefined conditions. This reduces delays, eliminates human bias, and ensures compliance with the original intent of the trust.

2. Transparency and Trustless Governance: A fundamental limitation of traditional trust funds is their lack of real-time transparency. Beneficiaries typically receive periodic reports and fund performance data is often restricted to those managing the trust. DAOs, however, operate on public blockchains, ensuring real-time, immutable records of all financial activities. Beneficiaries and stakeholders can access this data at any time, eliminating the need for blind trust in a centralized authority. Furthermore, DAO governance models distribute decision-making among stakeholders through tokenized voting mechanisms, shifting power away from a single trustee to a collective governance system.

V. Navigating Legal Challenges: DAOs and Trust Fund Management

Trust funds stand to benefit significantly from the advantages presented by DLT, DeFi, and Web3 technologies. However, legal challenges emerge in many jurisdictions, particularly in emerging economies, where concerns revolve around the degree of decentralization, governance rules associated with DAOs, and liabilities linked to smart contract operations.

Initially, legal and compliance discussions focused on whether contractual positions in a trust agreement could be tokenized using DLT. Professors León and Santamaría, in their research, demonstrated that for most countries in the LATAM region: "Any right granted to the beneficiary in a trust agreement executed in writing can be encoded in a smart contract if its contractual nature is conditional. In other words, any right contained in a clause and any obligation outlined in a covenant can be written using a programming language supported by a DLT"./

More recently, legal discussions have shifted toward the level of decentralization, automation, and liabilities a DAO can assume when acting as a fiduciary agent. This shift raises several key questions:

• Are smart contract-based trust agreements legally binding?

• Do smart contracts satisfy regulatory reporting (KYC and AML) and record-keeping requirements? • Who is responsible if a smart contract executes incorrectly?

• If a trustee relies on self-executing smart contracts, does this absolve them of liability in case of unforeseen consequences?

• What legal recourse do beneficiaries have if a smart contract fails or is hacked?

• How does GDPR or other privacy laws affect tokenized trusts? What happens if a beneficiary of a trust fund would like to be “forgotten”?

• Are smart contract-based disbursements considered taxable events?

These questions are actively debated by decision-makers, policymakers, Web3 enthusiasts, financial sector experts, and other key stakeholders. A promising solution to many of these challenges lies in a recently enacted Wyoming law known as the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act (DUNA) , which provides a legal framework for decentralized organizations, allowing blockchain networks to function within legal frameworks while maintaining their decentralized nature.

This new legal framework is helping to address key compliance and liability concerns in blockchain-based trust management. By granting DAOs legal entity status, DUNA enhances contract enforceability, allowing smart contracts to operate within a recognized fiduciary framework. While it does not explicitly regulate trust-specific smart contracts, it establishes a foundation for formal dispute resolution, liability protection, and regulatory oversight. For instance, if a DAO-based trust fund experiences smart contract failures or security breaches, beneficiaries could pursue legal recourse against the DAO entity itself rather than individual participants. Furthermore, by integrating DAOs into traditional legal structures, DUNA may encourage regulatory adaptation for KYC/AML compliance, tax reporting, and standardized governance mechanisms.

Even though the primary goal of DUNA is to enable blockchain networks to legally operate as DAOs, and this article aims to showcase how efficiencies and advantages from the DeFi ecosystem, particularly DAOs, can benefit traditional legal structures such as trusts, many of the legal concerns addressed in DUNA can serve as a guiding framework. As legal frameworks evolve, DUNA serves as a valuable precedent for integrating blockchain governance with traditional fiduciary structures, offering a blueprint for future regulatory developments in decentralized trust fund management.

VI. A Practical Case for Emerging Economies: Dominican Republic

DR Industry Outlook

The Dominican Republic boasts a dynamic economy, with an average GDP growth of 5% over the past 20 years. In this context, trust funds have played a crucial role in driving economic expansion across multiple sectors. Although legally a relatively new financial instrument in the country, trust funds have made significant contributions over the past 15 years, particularly in the real estate sector, a key pillar of the construction industry. Given the nation’s heavy reliance on tourism, trust funds have facilitated tourism infrastructure development while supporting residential housing projects, expanding access to homeownership, and fostering economic growth.

This trend is reflected in Dominican Republic data, which highlights the predominance of real estate trusts, accounting for the largest share with 693 registered funds. Management trusts follow with 129 funds, playing a crucial role in asset administration. Guarantee trusts, used primarily for securing financial obligations, total 37 funds, while other types of trusts, encompassing various fiduciary structures, amount to 35 funds. Investment trusts, which facilitate capital deployment into diverse assets, represent the smallest segment with only 3 funds. This distribution underscores the significant reliance on real estate fiduciary structures in the Dominican Republic, reflecting trends in property investment and asset securitization, while also indicating the limited adoption of investment-oriented trust funds in the country’s financial ecosystem.

A Pilot Project: Calculating the Equilibrium

In the DR context, efficiently operating a trust fund, particularly one related to real estate, is essential to ensuring trust and transparency among fiduciary companies, trustees, and beneficiaries. A key challenge in this process is determining the equilibrium point of a trust contract, which dictates when payments can be made to real estate developers as apartment owners complete their down payments. Traditionally, this process was handled manually, leading to human errors, limited transparency, and the need for multiple payment reprocessing, creating inefficiencies and operational risks.

This is where smart contracts come into play. By implementing automated contract execution, the equilibrium point is calculated automatically based on predefined conditions, milestones, and financial thresholds. This automation significantly reduces administrative burdens within trust service organizations, enhances confidence among beneficiaries (homebuyers), and ensures trustees benefit from immediate, transparent payments without manual intervention.

For policymakers and regulators, smart contracts offer additional advantages by enabling embedded supervision, allowing them to audit, monitor, and safeguard consumer rights in real-time as transactions are executed, rather than through retrospective reviews. This proactive regulatory approach improves financial oversight, enhances compliance, and strengthens consumer protection in trust fund operations.

This is a clear example of a pilot project implemented in the Dominican Republic, demonstrating how DLT technologies and the legal framework of a trust can be combined to enhance efficiency, transparency, and automation in traditionally manual processes. It also illustrates how trust structures are adopting DAO-inspired practices to streamline operations and optimize fiduciary management.

VII. Final Thoughts: The Future of Fiduciary Services

Instead of fully replacing trust funds, DAOs will complement existing fiduciary structures, leading to hybrid models that combine the efficiency of blockchain with the legal recognition of traditional trusts.

Potential hybrid models include:

1. Regulated DAO-based Trusts: DAOs that operate within a legal fiduciary framework, ensuring compliance while maintaining automation and transparency.

2. Institutional DAOs: Traditional banks and asset managers integrating smart contract-driven governance while retaining oversight and regulatory compliance.

3. Programmable Trusts: Legal trust structures that use blockchain for transparency, automation, and asset distribution, while trustees still hold legal responsibility.

The future of trust funds is unlikely to be a complete shift toward decentralization. Instead, it will likely be shaped by a convergence between decentralized and traditional financial systems, where blockchain-powered automation enhances fiduciary services rather than replacing them entirely. The challenge lies in striking the right balance between decentralization, legal enforceability, and institutional trust to create a more efficient and transparent trust ecosystem.

However, key innovations must be improved, particularly the advancement of oracles—systems that bridge real-world assets held by fiduciary institutions with blockchain networks. By ensuring that blockchains receive reliable, tamper-proof data about these assets, oracles can serve as a single, trustworthy source of truth within decentralized ecosystems. This innovation would significantly reduce red tape and administrative burdens in trust fund operations, enabling faster, more efficient, and automated financial processes while maintaining legal and regulatory integrity.

Disclaimer: Thanks to the DeFi Talents program (https://web3-talents.io/defi-talents), an 18-week mentoring program to empower talent for leadership in the decentralized finance space.

Sources consulted:

1. Business Research Insights. (2025, February 10). Custody and trust services market size, share, growth, and industry analysis, by type (Equity, Fixed Income, Alternative Assets, Others), by application (Individual, Business), regional insights, and forecast to 2032. https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/custody-and-trust-services-market-113604

2. DAO Legal Framework - Part I -Kerr, D., & Jennings, M. (2021). A legal framework for decentralized autonomous organizations (Part I). Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved from https://a16zcrypto.com

3. DAO Legal Framework - Part II -Jennings, M., & Kerr, D. (2022). A legal framework for decentralized autonomous organizations (Part II): Entity selection framework. DAO Research Collective & Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved from https://a16zcrypto.com

4. DUNA Legislation (Wyoming State Law on DAOs) Wyoming State Legislature. (2024). Wyoming Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act. Senate File No. SF0050.

5. FELABAN Report (COLAFI 2023 Data) Fideicomisos Latin American Committee. (2024, September 3). Cifras COLAFI FELABAN 2023 VF. Latin American Banking Federation (FELABAN).

6. Jennings, M., & Kerr, D. (2024, March 8). The DUNA: An oasis for DAOs. a16z crypto. Retrieved from https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/duna-for-daos/

7. Kerr, David and Jennings, Miles, A Legal Framework for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations - Part III: Model Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act (March 5, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4749245 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4749245

8. Kowalski, M., Lee, Z. W. Y., & Chan, T. K. H. (2021). Blockchain technology and trust relationships in trade finance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120641

9. León Santamaría, G., & Santamaría, M. M. (2022). Fideicomiso, blockchain, tokenización de participaciones y DAOs: Su viabilidad como vehículo jurídico en Latinoamérica (“Being Tokenized”). Diario La Ley, 2022-F. Retrieved from https://colabogmza.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Diario-30-12-22.pdf

10. León, G. (n.d.). Fideicomiso como envoltorio legal de las DAOs: DAO LLC. LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fideicomiso-como-envoltorio-legal-de-las-daos-dao-llc-gilberto-le%C3%B3n-d90rf/

11. Ureña, L. (2025). Interview by Sovieski Naut. Personal communication.