In this article we will explore:

(1) Differences in lending between Traditional Finance (TradFi) and DeFi

(2) Ithil’s innovation: the Internal Lending Engine

If you’re already familiar with the basics of loans and collateralisation, you can skip ahead to section two.

(1) Differences in lending between TradFi and DeFi

Lending is a key driving force behind the creation of value, and as a result, wealth. It connects holders of capital to those risk takers with the bravery, wit, chops and ideas to create new value.

At the same time, (new) ventures always carry some inherent risk, and sometimes even the most capable mavericks fail — often due to nothing more than bad timing or luck. As a result, capital is lost.

While many are keen to lend out their surpluses and passively earn returns, nobody wants to lose their capital. That is why different types of loans exist, as well as mechanisms to price the loans and protect lenders against defaults. Let’s take a look.

TradFi loans

In TradFi loans are divided into two main categories. Secured loans and unsecured loans. Secured loans loans require collateral from the borrower; they must put up assets like a house, car, or stocks. What’s more, the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio rarely exceeds 100% — essentially full collateralisation or more.

As a result, these loans are seen as low-risk for the lender, and cheap for the borrower. They are not very capital-efficient, however, as the borrower cannot borrow more than the total value.

Unsecured loans on the other hand, are not collateralised. They are supported by credit score and/or reputation of the borrower only. This type of loan is possible due to the know your customer (KYC) processes in TradFi. When you must prove your identity before taking an unsecured loan, the idea of grabbing the money and disappearing doesn’t sound great. Still, the risk of a complete default is much higher, and so the interest rates are much higher as well. For lenders that aren’t risk-averse (the average cryptocurrency enjoyer, basically), unsecured loans can be very interesting.

DeFi loans

In DeFi, practically all loans are collateralised. In general we say:

(A) Collateral amount ≥ borrowed amount = the loan is overcollateralised

(B) Collateral amount ≤ borrowed amount = the loan is undercollateralised

Lending in DeFi is a curiosity in this sense: we’re the only space that uses the collateralisation percentage of a loan as the key differentiator.

This has good reason; DeFi is trustless and anonymous. The closest thing to a tangible identity is a wallet address — linked to an ENS domain at best.

What’s more, a single biological (and soon perhaps virtual) person can have a nearly unlimited amount of wallets, and it’s very hard if not impossible to prove that a wallet address is effectively owned by a biological person. In fact that’s kind of the whole point.

This raises a huge issue from a game-theoretical point of view though. If you’re anonymous, and someone lends you a bunch of money with no collateral to be liquidated in case the loan goes wrong, the optimal move is to simply run off with the money.

In fact, this is also true for undercollateralised loans. That is why the handful DeFi protocols that offer undercollateralised loans, do so through some kind of restriction. Typically, these restrictions are:

• KYC Mostly useless on-chain, may be needed where real assets are involved (taking a loan to buy a house, a car, lending to a startup, etc).

• Credit checks/scores Slows things down significantly and may be easily circumvented.

• Permissioned loans Discriminatory to the borrowers and not completely decentralised as some central entity decides credit-worthiness.

• Restricted movement of funds Depends a lot on the implementation. Can be implemented as a walled garden, meaning that funds cannot leave the loan issuer’s ecosystem [until the loan has been repaid], which drastically limits usefulness.

• Another option is time limited e.g. flash loans which require the loan to be repaid in the same block. Only useful for sophisticated participants, as these requires custom, single purpose atomic actions (usually arbitrage).

The case for undercollateralised loans in DeFi

Undercollateralised lending running on the trustless, permissionless and open rails of decentralised finance is — while challenging — highly desirable. The combined strength of accessible capital and borderless infrastructure is simply too useful to ignore, even for mainstream applications. Challenges do exist, but the pioneers in the web3 space are working hard to overcome them. In fact, that’s exactly what we’ve done with Ithil.

Challenges do exist, but the pioneers in the web3 space are working hard to overcome them. In fact, that’s exactly what we’ve done with Ithil.

(2) Ithil’s innovation: the Internal Lending Engine

From the very beginning, Ithil’s team felt very strongly about staying true to the ethos of web3. At the same time, part of the team has a background in traditional finance, and we couldn’t help but notice that some elementary financial instruments are missing from the web3 space. Finally and most importantly, we are practical thinkers, and solution-oriented.

So we asked ourselves, how can we build useful undercollateralised lending infrastructure for web3, without forfeiting some of the core principles we hold so dear?

The solution emerged: an Internal Lending Engine (ILE), coupled with a DAO voting mechanism. Let’s break it down.

What is the Internal Lending Engine (ILE)?

The ILE is built on a simple concept: all lending, borrowing and repaying happens within Ithil’s smart contracts. This makes it possible for anyone to take an undercollateralised loan in true web3 style: completely trustless, permissionless and automatic.

Now you might think: “Ok, very cool, but how can the borrowed money be used if it stays within Ithil’s smart contracts?” That’s a completely reasonable thought, and also how we get to the very cool part.

The ILE consists of two separate groups of smart contracts. These are the Vault and the Strategies.

The Vault

The Vault can be viewed as Ithil’s central bank. It can receive tokens from Liquidity Providers (LPs), and lend out these tokens. When tokens are loaned, a receipt token is created and held within the Vault. This way, the Vault always know who loaned and/or borrowed, and how much.

The Vault also decides the price (interest rate) of loans. This depends on a number of factors:

• The riskiness of a Strategy

• The share of Total Value Locked (TVL) allocated to a specific Strategy

• The specific token to be borrowed and it’s risk factor

• The risk factor of the token used as collateral (bluechip <> shitcoin)

• The utilisation rate of Vault (loans become more expensive the more loans are issued)

The Strategies

The Strategies are smart contracts that can loan from the Vault, and then use the loaned tokens in predefined investment strategies. A Strategy can be viewed as an automated intermediary: it allows Users to take out loans and then deploy those funds to external web3 protocols — without ever directly touching the liquidity held by Ithil’s Vault.

These smart contracts have an added benefit: they remove the difficulties associated with executing complex and/or sophisticated investment strategies.

For example, an Ithil User wishing to run a multi-step DeFi Strategy involving the Balancer+Aura ecosystem does not need to interact with all the different smart contracts in that strategy. They only choose which token pair they wish to LP for, select the boost level (guided by our UI for optimal balance between borrowing costs and yield), and submit the tx.

Another example would on-chain mortgages. An Ithil user would choose an asset to purchase (for example, a Bored Ape or Decentraland LAND) deposit collateral, and choose the loan amount. Ithil would then purchase the asset and give the user a wrapped NFT granting usage rights. Ithil’s Vault would maintain control of the asset until the loan is repaid, giving full ownership to the user.

These are just a few examples of what it is possible with Ithil, an ever-expanding ecosystem of financial products for the next generation of web3 users.

DAO Governance Voting

If you’ve been paying attention, you might ask yourself how this is different from a central(ised) bank that decides single-handedly which Strategies are available. This is where the power of web3 infrastructure really shines. Ithil’s DAO decides through governance voting which assets are available to deposit and which Strategies are deployed.

This puts the power in the hands of the community, as anyone can create a proposal to be voted on by the DAO. If the proposal makes sense for the members, chances are high that it will pass the vote and get implemented.

The liquidity remains safe within Ithil’s smart contracts, but the community can decide where and how far it can reach through voting on the Strategies.

As a result, decentralisation is guaranteed while still enabling safe, undercollateralised loans as a web3 financial primitive.

Want to be the first to know about news, updates, contests and more?Make sure to follow our social channels here:

>>> https://linktr.ee/ithil_protocol <<<

>>> Our Public Testnet is still live on Goërli. Why not try it out? <<<

The strategy will be completely focused on the constantly expanding Balancer ecosystem, as well as benefit from the boosting option available on Ithil.

How does the strategy work?

To use any Ithil strategy, you need to deposit some of your own tokens to the protocol. You can deposit any (whitelisted) token on Ithil, which in turn will give you increased capital to play with on a curated list of Web3 protocols.

For example, let’s say you deposit $10,000 worth of USDC; Ithil will give you the opportunity to use more than your $10,000 of capital in the strategy through internal undercollateralised lending. You can adjust this boost depending on your risk-appetite.

Once you’ve added a margin to safeguard your position, you can freely use the strategy: this means that you can single-side LP into any Balancer pool with one click of a button. The strategy will then automatically stake your BAL LP tokens on Aura to maximise your net rewards. This generates very interesting yield, even during a bear market!

For example, you can use your margin posted in USDC to deploy $10,000 to the USDC-USDT-DAI pool, earning a projected total APR of 5.13% The strategy will deposit the pool tokens in the correct ratio for you — no need to go swapping around.

You can also boost your deposit: let’s say you feel extremely confident about the stETH-ETH pool which has a projected total APR of 12.64%. Ithil allows you to stretch your $10,000 capital and deploy $50,000 to the Balancer+Aura strategy, boosting your returns by 5x! Just watch out for impermanent loss — aim for liquidity pools with tokens that have similar price movements.

When you want to exit, you simply close your position through Ithil. The strategy will automatically withdraw the liquidity, as well as any rewards that you’ve earned (trading fees, incentives in BAL&AURA).

The best part: all BAL tokens earned can be deposited to Ithil and used as collateral for any Ithil strategy!

How does this benefit the Balancer ecosystem?

1. Balancer‘s introduction of vested escrow tokenomics has propelled the long-standing, well-respected protocol with their unique take on liquidity pool balancing to new heights in the DeFi world. Unfortunately, not everyone can benefit from the great rewards available to Balancer LPs — largely due to prohibitive gast costs typical for Ethereum mainnet.

   Ithil circumvents this problem by offering a boost to smaller (and even larger) users’ capital, enabling them to surpass the profitability threshold and partaking in Balancer’s great ecosystem.

   This boosts TVL, and as a result lowers trading fees. This makes Balancer more attractive to DeFi users, which creates higher trading volume and thus more fees for balancer LPs. In turn, more users will be enticed to add funds to Balancers pool, at which point the cycle restarts. In short, the Ithil strategy creates a posititive feedback loop that everyone benefits from.

2. As soon as the strategy becomes available, Ithil will also whitelist the $BAL token. What’s more, there is a dedicated strategy available to make the most of these tokens. This adds to the value of and yield options available to the BAL token.

3. Ithil is a serious, long term project with a multi-year if not multi-decade time horizon. We are in the game to change it for the better by bringing more capital efficiency, safety, and ease of use to all Web3 users. The team has already secured multiple strong partnerships with projects that share a similar vision for the future of DeFi and Web3. And many more are to come, including Metaverse, NFTs and real world asset tokenisation!

   In the future, a true partnership with Balancer can help further these goals and solidify both protocols as cornerstones of Decentralized Finance.

   When will the strategy be deployed?

   The first step is for Ithil to roll out the testnet, and conduct testing to create the best product possible before even deploying to mainnet. The private testing will commence very soon, initially with a small amount of carefully selected testers. We will scale up the amount of users from our tester pool gradually, until we feel ready to open up the public testnet. During this phase we will further improve the user interface and experience, iron out any remaining bugs, and do some final tweaking. While mainnet deployment is not planned, there’s a high chance that the Balancer strategy will immediately become available at launch.

Want to be the first to know about news and updates? Make sure to follow our various channels here:

>>> https://linktr.ee/ithil_protocol <<<

At the same time, Web3 products and strategies can be incredibly complex, confusing. Too often, they suffer from an awful user interface and experience. This leads to frustration, doubts, missed profits and even risk beyond that inherent to investing.

Of course, you first need to put in a lot of hours to learn about, and then keep up with all the protocols, their multiple tokens, yield farming programs, vesting schemes, multichain flywheels.. it never ends.

You could watch crypto YouTubers, but can you ever really trust them? They'll have their bags loaded and ready to dump on you long before they ever start recording a video. I mean, look at this guy.

Risky business What's more, the meltdowns of Wonderland and Luna have demonstrated that protocols and strategies which offer extremely high yields are not sustainable, no matter if their market caps surpass a billion dollars or rich venture capitalists tattoo the logo on their body. Sorry Mike.

Then there's the issue of gas fees. Ever since DeFi summer, the best, safest, most sustainable yields have always been found on Ethereum mainnet. But unless you're a sizeable whale, collecting  - and more importantly -  compounding your rewards can quickly erase any profit if done without a spreadsheet and careful planning.

Sometimes it feels like you need to a wizard to navigate all these hurdles. A wizard you say? Well.. what if I told you..

Stay up to date:

>>> https://linktr.ee/ithil_protocol <<<