<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>My Publication</title>
        <link>https://paragraph.com/@publication-1779883127495</link>
        <description>undefined</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:26:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>All rights reserved</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Infrastructure most of DeFi runs on launched a product yesterday]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@publication-1779883127495/the-infrastructure-most-of-defi-runs-on-launched-a-product-yesterday</link>
            <guid>YsC4v7i8cmVPncvoIi2S</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 12:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[infact most people interacting with those apps have already touched LI.FI infrastructure without knowing it. and that’s the point, the best infrastructure is the kind you never see. needless to say, LI.FI is not a new protocol chasing adoption. it’s been the execution layer underneath a large portion of today’s cross-chain DeFi for years. $80B+ in lifetime volume. 100M+ transfers. 60+ chains. 1000+ enterprise integrations. and yesterday, they launched LI.FI Intents.What an Intent Actually Ism...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>infact most people interacting with those apps have already touched <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> infrastructure without knowing it. and that’s the point, the best infrastructure is the kind you never see.<br>needless to say, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> is not a new protocol chasing adoption. it’s been the execution layer underneath a large portion of today’s cross-chain DeFi for years.</p><p>$80B+ in lifetime volume. 100M+ transfers. 60+ chains. 1000+ enterprise integrations.</p><p>and yesterday, they launched <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> Intents.</p><h3 id="h-what-an-intent-actually-is" class="text-2xl font-header !mt-6 !mb-4 first:!mt-0 first:!mb-0">What an Intent Actually&nbsp;Is</h3><p>most people in crypto think in routes. you want to move USDC from Arbitrum to Solana, you pick a bridge, accept the slippage, pay gas on both ends, and done.<br>that’s route-based execution. you’re telling the system exactly what steps to take.</p><p><em>Intents flip this completely.</em></p><p>with <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> Intents, you declare the result you want: "i want exactly 100 USDT on Solana, from USDC on Arbitrum."</p><p>from there, a competitive network of professional market makers called solvers&nbsp;, race to fulfill your order using their own capital. could be CEX desks, OTC counterparties, or personal inventory, whatever gets you the best execution fastest and you get the exact output amounts with no slippage and no gas tokens.</p><p><strong><em>all cross-chain complexity abstracted completely from the you, the end user.</em></strong></p><p>this is the shift from performance-based to result-based execution. and it’s the right direction.</p><h3 id="h-why-lifi-specifically" class="text-2xl font-header !mt-6 !mb-4 first:!mt-0 first:!mb-0">Why <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> specifically</h3><p>there are other intent protocols. the question is whether they have the infrastructure to back it up at the enterprise scale.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> co-authored ERC-7683, the cross-chain intents standard, alongside Uniswap Labs and the Ethereum Foundation. they didn’t adopt the standard, <strong><em>they wrote it.</em></strong></p><h3 id="h-three-things-this-unlocks-at-scale" class="text-2xl font-header !mt-6 !mb-4 first:!mt-0 first:!mb-0">Three Things This Unlocks at&nbsp;Scale</h3><p>these are 3 major things <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> Intents does for crypto as an industry.</p><ul><li><p>stablecoin payments across every major chain</p></li></ul><p>a user sends 100 USDC. the recipient gets exactly 100 USDC or 100 USDT. no gas tokens. no slippage on 1:1 stablecoin swaps. no wallet management.<br>this works across EVM and non-EVM chains, including Solana and Tron. Tron alone processes tens of billions in USDT transfers every day. plugging that into an intent-based execution layer makes stablecoin payments real infrastructure for neobanks, payment processors, and commerce platforms.</p><ul><li><p>access to real-world assets</p></li></ul><p>today, if an app wants to offer tokenized US Treasuries, equities, and gold, they need separate integrations with every RWA issuer. that’s months of engineering work before a single user sees anything.<br><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> Intents collapses that into one integration. Ondo’s USDY and xStocks are both available now. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> handles wallet eligibility checks, routes through licensed market makers, and handles execution.</p><p>. compliant liquidity for regulated fintech</p><p>this is the one most people skip over, but it’s the most important driver for mainstream adoption.</p><p>regulated firms, neobanks, licensed payment apps and institutional wallets cannot route through anonymous DeFi liquidity. AML and KYB obligations make it impossible and that’s been the wall between traditional fintech and onchain execution for years.</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> Intents now gives them a third path&nbsp;:</p><ul><li><p>a KYB-verified solver network.</p></li><li><p>every solver is a verified legal entity.</p></li><li><p>every transaction gets OFAC screening.</p></li><li><p>firms can choose which solvers execute their orders, no anonymous counterparties at any point.</p></li></ul><p>this is what will make onchain finance accessible to companies that aren’t crypto-native.</p><h3 id="h-what-this-actually-means" class="text-2xl font-header !mt-6 !mb-4 first:!mt-0 first:!mb-0">What This Actually&nbsp;Means</h3><p>incase you haven’t clocked it.</p><ul><li><p>crypto and fintech are converging.</p></li><li><p>neobanks want stablecoin rails.</p></li><li><p>wallets want to offer RWAs.</p></li><li><p>regulated institutions want onchain execution they can actually use.</p></li></ul><p>the infrastructure for all of that already exists because <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc" class="dont-break-out" href="http://LI.FI">LI.FI</a> has been running it for years. today’s launch is the first time it’s been packaged in a way that makes it legible to the builders who need it.</p><p><strong><em>i believe the shift from route-based to result-based execution is how cross-chain infrastructure should work. and it’s the right one.</em></strong></p><p>so if you’re building anything that touches cross-chain execution head over to → <a target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="dont-break-out markup--anchor markup--p-anchor" href="http://li.fi/intents">li.fi/intents</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>publication-1779883127495@newsletter.paragraph.com (My Publication)</author>
            <enclosure url="https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/6587ce4eb0529b2c6bc093f383f88cad8c87f9a426dc4c3765f088385412fd69.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>