Am I racist? Maybe. Depends who you ask and it depends on the race and context. I've certainly got no animosity for the Filipinos, or the Koreans, or the Japanese. I still love Clauds and make time to help her if she ever needs it. I still got love for Nash, doesn't mean I'm OK with millions of Indians flooding my country, or that I'll sit back silently and tolerate it so as to not hurt his feelings. We can assume I am, I don't care if I'm labelled as such (perhaps the point I was poorly trying to make at dinner). The term was coined, in it's modern usage, by Leon Trotsky (Jew) and popularised by both Trotsky and Magnus Hirschfeld (Jew) in the 1920s and 30s. It was designed to be used as a weapon to fracture unity and cohesion in white societies. Any time you try to raise legitimate criticism of what's happening to every white country (and only white countries) they use that term to move the goals. And the second you go to defend it "I'm not racist...", you lose. You get dragged down there and that's where you'll spend the rest of the argument, defending that position. So we've had to adapt: "OK, I'm racist. Don't change the subject".

It's a peculiar thing being Australian these days. You're on this absolute jewel, that your ancestors built from nothing in just 200 years, that's being siphoned away because they let in a handful of Jews and let them get established here. The likes of Anthony Pratt and Mark Leibler have cracked open the gates and are flooding it with Indians, Africans and Muslims, just like everywhere else that was white. These same guys will also say that multiculturalism would be bad for Israel. And they tell you that you're an occupier, a colonist. Despite your grandfather and his father and so on having had built this place, you don't belong. Obviously they don't extend that to the Africans etc. that they're importing, that's just reserved for whites. So you think "OK, I can get a South African passport. Let's tune in there" and you see Malema and his horde chanting "kill the Boer, kill the farmer". Not so hot. Doing a Zimbabwe 2.0. Rhodesia, which was the breadbasket of Africa before the blacks killed or forcibly removed all the white farmers, is now culling endangered elephants to stave off starvation. So you think "OK, well Europe is my ancestral lands. I'll go hang out there for a bit and see how it is". And then you get there, and you're met with some fucking African or Turk at immigration who's going to determine whether or not you can enter. I challenge you to find one, I can tell you there aren't any - a single white individual in parliament in a non-white country. Ours? Never diverse enough. You've got Huzma Yousaf over there standing up in parliament saying there are too many whites in Scotland, we had Latitia James crying out in New York that there are too many white males over there. The other day we had Lidia Thorpe ("aboriginal") in Parliament here saying the same shit - too many whites. Can you imagine if somehow I got into Chinese government, and I get on stage and I say "yeah look guys, there are too many fucking Asians around here." Do you think they would tolerate that? Do you think I'd even be deported or would it be straight up against the wall?

I honestly can't remember Sarah saying she had a black brother in law. I'm sorry to hear it, but I believe you. I can understand I put you in a very difficult position. I'm sorry my friend, but you know how I go. Is it racist to point out that if she has kids with him that she'll be 4x more likely to end up a single mother? That's a big jump when, these days, the odds were already stacked against her. Or that, in that event, she will be significantly less likely to find another partner - tall order to find hard data on that one, but it is bursting with anecdotes. Or that she's 3x more likely to be hospitalised from domestic violence? Or that she could pick any random European off the street and they would be more genetically similar to her than she would be to her own offspring? Are statistics and genetics racist? You tell me. I would assume that these are negative outcomes you'd want to shield your loved ones from. And this isn't some "white supremacist" thing; you can go look up Muhammad Ali's interview with Michael Parkinson from 1971, or look up what Malcolm X had to say on the matter. It's quite amusing watching Ali give Parkinson a hiding there, with Michael clearly trying to push a script that's just not landing. Both Malcolm and Ali were proponents of black nationalism, which is why George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American Nazi Party (ANP), went to go see Malcolm speak, where Malcolm gave the ANP members front row seats. The two had a mutual respect for one another and cooperated to some degree. That's where my money's at as to why they were both assassinated. It's the Jew that wants us diluted - the Jew can't conquer a homogeneous society. And this isn't some crazy antisemitic conspiracy. The Jews are quite flagrant about it for anyone with the nerve to look. You can look up Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi's (Jew) 1925 - 'Praktischer Idealismus' where he discusses the "Eurasian-Negroid" replacing Europeans via mass migration and Jews being the "spiritual aristocracy" that will assume control of them. Or you can grab yourself a copy of Theodore Kaufman's (Jew) 1941 - 'Germany Must Perish' where he calls for the eugenic sterilisation and cultural destruction of the Germanic people. In stark contrast, you can read Adolf Hitler's 1925/26 - 'Mein Kampf' and you will not find any mention of exterminating Jews, or of Aryans being the master race. He talks about, which is commonly and deliberately misquoted, Germans needing to be the masters of their own destiny, and the question to the Jewish problem is where do we find them a home. Isn't it curious that Judaism is the only exclusionary religion? You can convert, but it's a multi-year process that they can drag out indefinitely or just reject you arbitrarily. They won't let you in until they own you. In effect, they create a club where only Jews (who are not just a religion but also a race and ethnicity) are allowed to associate. Meanwhile, it's Jews who have led the charge in civil rights to prevent these same clubs/groups existing for white people.

Try to understand, and I know that this might be hard to wrap your head around, that all this ultimately stems from a place of love, not hate. I love my people, I love our history and culture, I love nature, I love our God. It's hardly debatable that these things aren't under attack. What is it in London now? A rape reported every hour, 2.3 sexual assaults an hour. 27 rapes a day in Sweden. There are estimates that at the current rate 1 in 4 Swedish women will be raped in their lifetime. Germany, France, Italy, Spain - all the same. 9 Afghans gang rape a 15 year old German girl, the Jewish judge gives a 2 year sentence to one and the other 8 serve no time because a Palestinian psychiatrist said the were just "blowing off steam due to the pressures culture shock" (paraphrasing). That very same judge, Anne Meier Göring, giving a 2 year sentence to a 97 year old man, pinning over 5000 murders on him, which they themselves admit were due typhus and starvation, for being on guard duty when he was 17. I think it was 3 days after our dinner that some Saudi rammed his car through a white crowd in the German Christmas market. I was going to forward it to you but figured better to give you some space and you'd probably see it anyway. And then last week the same shit happens again in Munich. We've had the exact same scenario happen here in Melbourne. Just this week in Australia: 3 aboriginal kids break into a couples house in Cairns, one held the boyfriend at knife point while the other 2 gang raped his girlfriend. None will be tried as adults, despite the "Adult Crime, Adult Time" laws. Oh, and Singh has just replaced Smith as the most common surname. Of course, you know how that goes in the UK, what with all your Mohammeds - at least we're not speaking German though. And we got that tikka masala, right? Makes it all worthwhile. I'd probably steer clear of the kebabs though, after reading about Charlene Downes. 14 year old girl, groomed, raped and ground up into a donner. I wonder if that's halal? It's probably kosher. And mate this all barely scratches the surface, what Steve refers to as "doom scrolling" I would call record keeping. If you want to comb through DOJ and FBI statistics, you can see that in the US you are infinitely (not hyperbole) more likely, as a white woman, to be raped by a black man than a black woman is to be raped by a white man. Blacks are 38x more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than reversed. Systemic racism? Sure - against whites. In fact, in the States, if you remove blacks from the data then their homicide rate falls down to almost on par with yours - clearly a "gun" problem. And it's got nothing to do with poverty either, else you'd see poor whites, of which there are plenty, chimping out the same, which is just not the case. That's not to say poverty doesn't affect crime, it does. Poor whites commit more crime than rich whites, true, but they also commit less crime than rich blacks - especially violent crime. Why are they like that? I don't fucking know. The most rational explanation out there is the underdeveloped prefrontal cortex. A part of the frontal lobe which governs emotion and impulse control. Samuel George Morton examined around 800 skulls in the 1840's and determined whites had a 12% larger cranial capacity than blacks. Professor Robert Bennett Bean dissected around 40 brains in 1906 and published his studies which showed a significantly smaller prefrontal cortex in Africans. This is also, of course, dubbed the most "racist" explanation and scientists today say that the methods were crude and modern MRI tech would mop the floor with them. Here's the thing though: that's 800 skulls and 40 more brains than these modern guys have examined. These guys have the tech, and really they already have all the data if they wanted to gather existing scans for comparative analysis. They want it to be wrong, but instead of simply doing a new study to quash these old ones, they just throw shade. And it's not a resource thing, because they are pumping billions into Critical Race Theory to try and push these socioeconomic and intergenerational trauma narratives, which ultimately crumble when you bring out the data. Why not just do the study? My guess: the guys that want to maintain the narrative, "we're all one race, the human race (except Jews, who are superior)", know that they wont get the data they want, and the guys that want to keep paying their mortgage know that it'll be the end of their career, but does the "why" even matter? Asians get their own countries, Muslims get their own countries (still holding on to a number of ours), Africans and Indians get their own countries (and look what they've done to them), even Jews get their own country (although most only ever go there to flee the consequences of their actions). Why are we just a series of economic zones that anyone is free to plunder? That's the more pertinent "why". What's the minimum acceptable amount of GDP added per rape? Access to white people is not a human right.

But what about the intergenerational trauma then? Surely we got some things to account for there, like slavery. That must have been pretty brutal. Well I don't want to spoil a big reveal later on so I'll just say that on the "European" side of things we had a lot less to do with that than we've been led to believe. And while 12 million African slaves most certainly did cross the Atlantic into the new world, not one of them would have were it not for their African brothers' involvement. Speaking with your average liberal today, I would swear that they have some image in their head of an Elmer Fudd type character running around Africa with a giant net, swooping up peaceful African families and throwing them over his shoulder onto a boat. The reality is that we didn't capture any of them. West African empires and tribes like the Songhai, Mossi and Fulani would frequently fight one another and, as per their customs, the captives of the losing side were now slaves. They had a lot of slaves and gold, what they lacked was salt and horses; so they traded slaves and gold to coastal settlements for salt and horses. But it still would have been a very traumatic experience for them, right? Sure, but to suggest that historic trauma is something exclusive or uniquely severe to Africans is absolutely absurd. Asides from the fact that Europe has spent 100 of the last 300 years in major conflict (and these conflicts are no joke), and even excluding the diseases and famines throughout that time; here is a piece of history that you are probably not aware of - the Islamic slave trade of Christians. Predating the Atlantic trade and ending shortly after, as many as 6 million Christians were taken as slaves. 2 million from piracy and coastal raids, and another 4 million through Islamic expansion into Christendom. And while that might only be half as many as the Atlantic trade, most of these Christians had a fate far worse than picking cotton in a field. If you were a woman, and you were past your prime or plain in nature, then you would be put in a textile warehouse or be a house slave. If you were young and fit, well now you were a sex slave. Formally a concubine, but lets call a spade a spade. If you were a man, and you were lucky, you would be worked to death in a mine or chained to an oar to row for their pirates or navy. If you were unlucky, you were castrated and used as a guard for one of the harems. Maybe you'd see your wife there, if she was young and fit. Who is singing their lament?

So socioeconomic factors don't hold up to data. Intergenerational trauma is a fucking joke. What else have they got? Ah! We totally forgot: turns out all these foreigners have been here the whole time. A few hundred Indians and Arabs shipped into Australia with their camels for a few years, there to help with logistics while Anglo-Saxons built a rail network through the desert, and suddenly they are "founding stock". The poetic irony that Australia is now home to the largest feral camel population in the world, which needs frequent culling to prevent them stripping the land bare. According to the History Channel the first Scandinavians were black and the last King of Kattegat was a strong independent black woman. According to AMC Anne Boleyn, Queen of England in the 1530s, was black. Netflix is saying Sir Isaac Newton was black. Disney has presented us with a multicultural adaptation of the founding fathers - Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Aaron Burr all black. Cleopatra (who was Greek - Macedonian to be precise), Joan of Arc, Edward IV - blacked. The BBC, and more insidious BBC kids, present as fact that Roman Emperors have been black and that Africans even built Stonehenge and the Hadrian Wall. Fuck me, these guys have been busy! I guess that's why they never got around to building Africa (happy 'Black History Month' by the way - joke might not land by the time this actually goes out, but the poor bastards only got the shortest month). And while you might simply laugh at the absurdity of it all, a child's mind is an impressionable sponge; the next generation, once grown, might think you a bigot for laughing. There are probably a number of historical "facts" that you hold true that our forefathers would have laughed at. You might believe that the Crusades we're wicked and cruel, a dark chapter in our history. But they always leave out the 500 years of Islamic expansion into Christendom before the first Crusade was even launched. Expansion by conquest and the aforementioned slavery that ensued. In truth, every single Crusade was fought on Christian soil. Or maybe you subscribe to the idea that our Enlightenment Era was built off of the intellectual discoveries of Islamic scholars, lets see how that one stacks up. We did translate Arabic texts into our own languages, true. But most of these texts were originally translated from Greek or Latin into Arabic before the original documents were destroyed. Islamic expansion seized all of North Africa, all of Syria, Anatolia and the Levant, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Spain, they even made incursions into France and Barbary pirates raided as far as Iceland. In addition to taking land, gold, resources and slaves they also took knowledge when they ransacked our libraries, right from the very onset when in 642 AD Caliph Umar torched the Library of Alexandria, one of the greatest wonders of the ancient world. So yeah, the notion that these Arabs were some enlightened guardians of wisdom, keeping the torch lit for us while they also pillaged our lands, is indeed laughable. Fairer to say that they were one of the largest contributors to us entering the Dark Age. Of course most of our generation wouldn't know that, and many might consider that "Islamophobic" - Because they don't teach the parts that paint the real picture, they just show you what they want you to see. The only book burning they really tell you about is the Nazis. At least when the Nazis were burning books they weren't erasing anyone's history or culture; they were burning transgender studies and pornographic content - a detail they also skip in class. And while they're not literally burning books today, on the other side of that coin no one reads books today and if they do they're most likely digital. Nonetheless, right before your eyes your history and culture are being erased and rewritten, and we're just going along with it because we're afraid of being called bigoted or racist. To quote George Rockwell: "Without a deadly hate for that which threatens what you love, love is just an empty catchword for hippies, queers and cowards."

A couple of things that are worth pointing out: Firstly, TODAY there are nearly 10m slaves in Africa, 11m in India and another 5m in the Middle East. None of these groups, like BLM, are lifting a finger to address these situations or even to raise awareness to that fact. They just want to attack white people. And secondly, the population of Africa was ~220m in 1950, we've (the West) given them close to $3T since then and now their population is ~1.5b. In that same time frame the global white population has gone from ~750m to ~550m. That's a 27% decline in population in 75 years, 32% if you go back another 10 years and include WWII. We've gone from 30% of the worlds population to less than 7%. It's not just about being outpaced in growth, we are going backwards - so that really begs the question as to why are we helping them, when clearly we're the ones dying. All these Atheists laughing at the Darwin Awards, and admittedly some of them are pretty funny; but what tier of fucking Darwin Award are you entitled to for volunteering your entire race for extinction? Or is it a Cuckoldry Award? Average testosterone levels sitting around 50% of our grandfathers would support that angle. If people want to label us bigoted for forming a rational prejudice, well that's fine, it's all water off a ducks back at this point; and we would say they are the ones who are ignorant for refusing to acknowledge a very clear and measurable reality. There is nothing virtuous about selling your own down the river for social credit.

I've mentioned "they" quite a few times above, and I think you know who I'm referring to.. I did mention Jews a handful of times, but not nearly as much as I'm about to. Do I connect everything to the Jews? Well, maybe. Lets unpack it and go over some conversation subjects. I don't think I brought up COVID, but how can you talk about that without talking about all the Jews in the CDC or in big pharma? Or that the virus, engineered or not, hit Jews the softest and Europeans the hardest? Or that every highly vaccinated population has seen a corresponding decline in birth rates with Israel being the only exception? How can you not mention that Jew, Yuval Harari, and his nefarious activities? It all seems pertinent to the subject. I'm pretty sure I didn't bring up Epstein or Maxwell either but those two are straight up Jewish, her father was a Mossad agent and I feel pretty confident asserting that they are/were too. If these guys are running a blackmail farm, isn't it important to discuss who they're working for?

If you want to talk about Bitcoin, the antithesis to the international banking cabal, how can you not talk about the Jews heading those organisations? 30% of all Federal Reserve Chairmen have been Jewish and they've sat in that seat nearly 40% of all time. 30% of CEO's of major Western banks, 40% of founders. It's not that we don't found banks, but a good number of them we're gobbled up by Jewish banks during the Great Depression, just after the creation of the Fed. How about all those greedy Capitalists hording all the money? A.O.C (Jew) and her "Tax the Rich" dress. Ok, lets take a look at who they actually are. According to Forbes, 35% of US billionaires are Jewish - 18x overrepresented. 16% of billionaires in the UK - 36x overrepresented. 8% in Europe - 42x overrepresented. 20% of Australia's billionaires - 45x overrepresented. If you want the most up to date global figures we can look at 'Forbes Israel's 2025 List', a list of Jewish billionaires world-wide which puts them at just shy of 10% of the worlds billionaires - 50x overrepresented. And this is only public knowledge Jews, there are plenty of ethnic Jews who identify as atheist or otherwise fly under the radar that would pump these numbers up even higher (that same principle applies to any of these other numbers concerning Jews in here). So it's surprising to see A.O.C make such an antisemitic statement, especially when it's friendly fire - but their media does a pretty good job pinning it on the middle-class whites. Maybe we give those a miss and move onto other economic subjects like inflation or the housing crisis. If you want to talk about the housing crisis throughout most western nations or the rampant rise in cost of living that goes with it (and you wanted to ignore the fiat currency angle to spare the Jews), how can you not talk about mass migration, and if you're going to talk about mass migration how can you not talk about the Jewish NGOs funding it or the Jewish lobby groups who opened the gates? Anthony Pratt, Alejandro Mayorkas, Antony Blinken, Mark Leibler, Jeremy Greenberg, Barbara Spectre, Emanuel Celler or the 100s of other Jews who have been instrumental in rewriting Western immigration policies to turn them into multicultural "melting pots" (a term coined by Israel Zangwill - Jew - in 1908), all of whom simultaneously reject the idea of a multicultural Israel as it would "compromise their national interests". Hmm, I wonder if it's doing that to ours? Nah, that's just me being racist.. If we're going to talk about fiat and the Fed and Israeli national interests, how can JFK not get a mention? JFK who said in a speech early in his presidency: "For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence. On infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumour printed, no secret is revealed." JFK who extended the Treasury's capacity to issue silver backed notes, effectively maxing out their silver reserves, a move which directly undermined the Feds push to transition into fiat currency. JFK who knew the Israelis were developing nuclear weapons (suspected, but he was right) and was making moves to shut it down. The same man who was going to force the American Zionist Council (predecessor to AIPAC) to register as foreign agents. The WWII veteran JFK, who in his diary wrote: "Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived... He had in him the stuff of which legends are made." He himself was enamoured with Nationalism, starting The Presidents Council for Youth Fitness and pushing for a more independent US. I wonder who killed him (of course it was the Jews). And before they'd even finished scooping his brains from the back seat of that continental, Lyndon Johnson was sworn in to get straight to work reversing all Kennedy's policies. So maybe we just avoid all those topics.

You want to talk about the fucked up shit you hear coming out of Hollywood? Well, my friend, it's no secret that Hollywood is Jewish. How about pornography? That's a massive blight on society. It's destroying a lot of our women and also the guys who consume it take a big hit to testosterone among other negative outcomes. It was also created, and still dominated, by Jews. In fact the largest conglomerate of pornographic content is Mindgeek, co-founded by Solomon Friedman - Lawyer, Rabbi, Jew. Maybe you think it's just good business, let's see what Al Goldstein (Jew) had to say: "The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASP's), its subversive character becomes more charged". Yikes, let's avoid that one then. What about hook-up apps? Tinder - Sean Rad (Jew), Bumble - Whitney Wolf Herd (Jew), Grindr - Joel Simkhai (Jew) Ashley Madison, the app for married individuals to commit adultery - Darren Morgenstern (Jew). How about OnlyFans? Leonid Radvinsky, he's a Jew. Ok, we'll skip that one. Do you want to talk about feminism and the fucking headache that's been? Well, Wikipedia has a list of prominent feminists sorted by religion - 60% of them are Jewish, and probably more when you consider the ethnicity of the atheists. 42% of the top 50 books published on the subject were written by Jews. To quote Linda Gordon, Jewish feminist, from her 1970's article 'Functions of the Family' - "The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. Whatever it's ultimate meaning, the breakup of families is an objectively revolutionary process" so I guess we'll just ignore that one too. What about the pill and the SSRIs that a lot of them graduate to closer to the wall? Those are destroying our women and relationships. Sure are, and they've got Jewish fingerprints all over them. Pincus, Djerassi and Rosenkranz for the pill, Brodie and Snyder for SSRIs - two more Jewish contributions. Not to mention the 30% Jewish representation in CEO's and founders of the big pharmaceuticals that are pushing them. How about abortions? That's a sensitive one, and huge. On average, where it's legal across the West, which is virtually all of it, 22% of white babies are aborted. Pair that with our dwindling birth rates and it's no wonder we're going extinct. And, once again, the loudest voices championing it across the West are also the most nasal. Abortion is a Jewish sacrament, the National Council of Jewish Women argue that a ban on abortion violates their freedom of religion and 1200 synagogues joined to support that claim. And if it's not coming from their religious angle, it's coming from their feminist vector. Now you compare our birth and abortion rates to Israel (and Jews at large, but it's harder to find that data), of which every Jew has citizenship - they have the highest birth rate in the first world and one of the lowest abortion rates, so why are they campaigning so tirelessly to get our babies flushed? Maybe we try LGBTQ instead - such a persecuted minority, what with their government protection, corporate sponsorship and oversaturated media support. Maybe you can remember, 15 or so years ago, Occupy Wall Street and the Global Day of Rage. Hundreds of thousands of, quite plainly dressed, ordinary people marching against the corruption in government and the international bankers they served. Iceland had some tremendous results - government forced out, bailouts cancelled, bankers jailed and yet still, despite removing all their "experts", one of the fastest recoveries from the GFC. Then it all seemingly ended overnight and the next month you had big gay rainbow parades marching down the streets instead. Transvestites trying to pull your kids up onto the floats with the likes of "Wells Fargo", "Goldman Sachs", "Citibank" and all the others plastered on the side. Seeing as apparently all these guys deserve some kind of award, how can we not shout props to the massive Jewish overrepresentation in the creation and advancement of homo ideology. To glance over the surface, Jews like Edith Windsor and her legal work for gay marriage, or Brenda Howard "Mother of Pride", Fritz Klein and his development of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid, or George Weinberg for coining the term "Homophobia", or Larry Brinkin on the San Francisco Human Rights Commission (he was arrested for child porn though, so maybe he doesn't get a medal). How about "Allyn Walker" (Allyson) trying to tack an M on after the Q - that would be an M for "Minor Attracted Person" - the poor thing got attacked for her Jewish heritage after that publication. Of course you can't talk about any of this without mentioning the 8 genders in the Talmud or the work of the Jewish pioneers at the Institute for Sexual Science in the Weimar Republic. Jews like Arthur Kronefeld, Felix Abraham, and the aforementioned Magnus Hirschfeld (big one) along with several others, churning out homoerotic movies, photography, literature and theses. Even performing the worlds first gender-reassignment surgery. That is until the Weimar Republic became the Third Reich and the Hitler Youth burned it all. Good lads. I was a bit surprised you hadn't heard of the Weimar Republic, not shocked, it's not something they actively teach, but surprised. Worth looking into. To give you the express summary - Economic stagnation, hyperinflation, rampant degeneracy, German people forced by desperation into all kinds of depravity, Jews gleefully orchestrating and exploiting it, Communist roots taking hold... and then Adolf Hitler shut it down. I guess we'll avoid the degeneracy and cultural rot too.

What about all those Communists running around today? You want to talk about Communism? Bolshevism, which is Communism, is 100% Jewish to its core. Marx - Jew, Lenin - Jew, Trotsky - Jew, Stalin - contested. In 2013 Putin came out and admitted that at least 85% of the first Soviet government was Jewish. 2/3rds of all NKVD and KGB (Communist) spies that were captured in America during the Cold War were Jewish. China's Communism didn't happen to just sprout up independently at the same time either. Jews like Sidney Shapiro, Sidney Rittenberg, Israel Epstein, Solomon Adler, Frank Coe, Grigorii Voitinski and others were instrumental in shaping that regime. So I guess we'll also skip communism. Maybe we check out Libertarianism. How about Javier Milei in Argentina, that Libertarian "revolutionary" - yeah, "not Jewish"... but he does have weekly readings with his Rabbi, he is in the process of converting, does wear a kippah and wave the Israeli flag, and if that's not enough.. First order of business was to move 62 tonnes of gold out of the country and wont say where - probably sitting in Basel where Janet Yellen (Jew) will divvy it up among their creditors - can only speculate as to who those creditors might be, but I'm sure you know who I'd bet on... and ah, what else has he done - oh yeah, a pump and dump job for the Libra token, a token on the Jewish-built Solana network. $100m rug-pulled from Libertarian retards who thought he was their guy. Seriously mate, don't ever subscribe to that Libertarian bullshit - the very fact that they would need a guy speaks volumes to the hypocrisy of their ideology. Everyone go to your own homes and defend your own shit, we'll be with you shortly. It is peak divide and conquer and courtesy of Ayn Rand, who was also Jewish (Alisa Rosenbaum), building off the foundations laid by Mises (Jew), Rothbard (Jew) and Friedman (Jew). Ok, Argentina's out, how about we scroll up to Mexico. Yeah, how about Mexico.. A nation that is 90% Christian and 0.05% Jewish, so naturally you'd expect a Jewish woman, Claudia Sheinbaum, to be the new president, in what has been recorded as the most violent election in Mexico's modern history; with 37 candidates murdered and over 800 non-lethal attacks against politicians, candidates and officials. What are her policies? A warning to the US not to intervene with Mexican cartels and.. a bus service, for all those refugees that HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) has ferried to their southern border to then expedite their journey all the way up to the Texas border where Mayorkas will have teams ready to pry open the fence. You know what, maybe we just stay off the topic of Latinos.

Terrorism! That's been a pretty juicy one for a while, hey? Can't bring up terrorism without mentioning 9/11, and it would be negligent to talk about that without mentioning the 5 dancing Israelis. Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shumel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari were all caught celebrating and high-fiving one another as they recorded the towers collapse from the top of their "removalist" van. Upon arrest they were found to be in possession of multiple fake passports and nearly $5000 concealed in a sock. Sivan would tell police "We are Israeli. We are not your problem" and then some of them would go on to say that they were in New York "to document the event". The men were employed by Urban Moving Systems, owned by Dominik Suter, also Israeli, who was identified by police on 12th for initial questioning and when they returned for a follow up a few days later - the phones had been disconnected, the building abandoned, documents scattered all over the place and Suter had fled back to Israel. What's the next logical step? Of course, you release the other 5 back to Israel. It doesn't matter though, because we've got that passport, the only passport to survive any of the crashes, and lucky for us it belonged to the hijacker Satam al-Suqami, picked up off the street and handed in to police by an anonymous source. Now we know it was some Afghani cave dwellers so we'd best go and invade Iraq, who poses a legitimate threat to Israel. And fuck, if you want to talk about luck then how about 'Lucky Larry'. Larry Silverstein (Jew) takes out a 99 year lease on the towers less than 2 months before the attack and gets awarded over $4.5B in an insurance payout, but his luck doesn't end there; Larry, his son Roger, and his daughter Lisa we're all, for independent reasons, absent from work that day. But maybe 9/11's not so vogue these days. How about the Lavon Affair in 1954? Where Israel used Egyptian Jews to try and bomb civilian targets including American and British educational centres, the objective being to blame local groups and pressure Britain to maintain a stronger military presence there, to try and counter the rising nationalist movement. This one's not even conspiracy territory, they just don't talk about it - much like the USS Liberty in 1967. The Liberty, a flagged US surveillance vessel, was conducting operations in international waters off the Sinai Peninsula when it was deliberately attacked by both the Israeli Air Force and Navy after having its communications jammed. For 75 minutes they used rockets, napalm and torpedoes to sink the ship before using machine guns to try and finish the survivors in life rafts, which is a war crime. The only reason any of them survived was because they managed to get off a distress signal, using emergency frequencies, which was picked up by the U.S. Sixth Fleet in the Eastern Mediterranean, forcing Israel to cease its attack. The survivors were, and still are, adamant that this was a deliberate attack on a known US vessel. President Johnson, however, was happy to completely ignore the war crimes that had been committed and accept Israel's apology for a case of mistaken identity. And, yes, that is the very same Lyndon Johnson who undid all Kennedy's policies. OK. Israel is an obvious vector to bring it back to the Jews, what about ISIS though? Yeah, fucking ISIS. Isn't it astounding that their primary objective is supposedly to destroy Israel and yet.. they hit everyone BUT Israel. In fact a lot of the time they destabilise regions, like Syria and Lebanon, that posed an actual threat to Israel. Maybe we just ditch the subject of terrorism if you want to keep it away from Jews. How about current global conflicts? Well, shit mate, we've got one Jewish dictator in Ukraine who has pushed half a million Slavs through the meat grinder, including pregnant women, under one of the harshest conscription laws Europe has seen in recent history. Of course the Jews were up and out of there before they had their numbers called, but don't worry; they'll be back for squatters rights. And then we've got ahh.. Israel, who are carrying out a televised genocide which, somehow, all the media, entertainment and politicians are publicly supporting - I wonder why... Maybe we stay off conflicts

That media though, that's a real circus these days. Yep, a Jewish circus. 70% ownership and 60% of CEO's in the US, not too dissimilar across the West in terms of overrepresentation, but there is a larger population in the states (2%). It is little wonder that the overwhelming majority of them are crying for Israel's right to commit atrocities. Not just media, but influencers too. Middle-ground estimates put Israel spending at about $125m a year to influencers to push pro-Israeli narratives. There's a phenomenon called the Primacy Effect, basically people have a greater tendency to remember the first piece of information they hear or read even if they receive a correction after. In studies, roughly 60% of people will stick to the first bit of information after it's been corrected, but this is very dependent on the repetition and exposure of the first bit compared to the latter. We've known about it, in this format, since the 70's and it can most certainly be weaponised. A good example would be the recent case of the "40 beheaded babies". Not only does it stick with you because it's barbaric, but it was also getting 24/7 parroting for 3 straight days before the voice of reason could be heard. But when they retracted it, do you think it was done with the same energy as when they promoted it? Of course not, its a tiny article on page 12 and consequently a lot of people (couldn't give you a figure) still believe that 40 babies were beheaded. A great example is Dietary Guidelines and general dietary advice. We've known since the 90's that cholesterol is not the culprit for heart disease, it's sugar that does the damage and cholesterol repairs. You can still suffer a stroke from the cholesterol that repaired a blood vessel, but if your sugar is under control then its non-issue. For 70 odd years, sugar has gotten a free-pass while cholesterol has been demonised. Cholesterol is very important for 2 other functions: 1) pumping up your testosterone levels & 2) it's an essential building block for the production of Myelin, which is critical for healthy brain function - critical thought, memory, decision making, attention and focus. Red meat, animal fats, dairy, salt - "we know" (studies demonstrate) have been wrongfully accused for decades, but your average Joe still thinks they're trying to kill him - and they all boost your testosterone. On the other side of that, the shit they push on you - seed oils, soy, low fat, sugar (more pull than push) - well all this stuff TANKS your testosterone. Ok maybe one more example to bring it back. The most recent "incident" in Gaza. Apparently Hamas strangled 2 kids and then used explosives to make it look like they had been bombed. The absurdity in their audacity is just.. you'd think you're watching an SNL skit. Israel has dropped over 85,000 tonnes of explosives on Gaza, that's just over 4 Nagasaki bombs, and Gaza is not a very big area. Any hostages that might have been there.. well it's a pretty safe bet that you've hit them by now. But Israel puts out the clarion call and instantly, every news group, all the influencers - "2 babies strangled by Hamas". What's worse is all the politicians. Why the fuck are they up there, they're not all Jewish? (although a disproportionate amount definitely are - 37% of Biden's Cabinet, 15% of Trumps so far) Well outside of speculating on who might have what on them from Epstein's or a similar operation, you just have to look at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) - 75% of the House of Representatives and 90% of US Senators receive financial benefits from AIPAC, to varying degrees - some are definitely cheaper than others, but most are bought and paid for. We have different laws here regarding that kind of interference, as do you there, but we have our equivalents, to name a few - Australia Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC), Australian Jewish Association (AJA), Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM), European Leadership Network, Friends of Israel Initiative, Transatlantic Institute. And surely this is one of those things you can see, right? Starmer getting on the podium every other day "Guys, antisemitism is literally the worst thing you can do in this world. I don't want to see any of it". I mean just today, RFK Jr. (the shit Kennedy) declared antisemitism a "public health crisis". What the fuck that means or how you "treat" it, I can only speculate - maybe Elon can help out with his Neuralink. I don't know mate, if we want to keep it off the Jews then I think media and politics are off the table.

Maybe you've got some gripe with Christianity you want to talk about, that's got to be a good angle to steer it off the Jews, right? Shoe's on the other foot now? Well, it would be remiss of me not to point out the star of David on the popes hat, or the fact that the Archbishop of Canterbury (head of the Anglican Church) has been a Jew (ethnic) for over a decade. How else do you get blessings on gay marriage and dyke bishops as heads of Churches. Eva Brunne's first order being to try remove the crosses from Church as she didn't want to offend the local Muslims. 1 Timothy 2:12 - "I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over man, but to be silent." And of course there is no star of David. It's not in the Bible, nor in the Torah. There is Acts 7:43 "ye took up the tabernacle (tent) of Moloch and the star of your god Remphan.." Moloch being the Canaanite (who were Jews) deity which requires child sacrifice, Remphan being Saturn (Francisco Goya's 'Saturn Devouring His Son'). Why do I say Jews are Canaanites? That's not me, that's a 2017 publication from the University of Tel Aviv: Jews are 50-60% Canaanite. And you might be reading that line about the child sacrifice and be thinking that's a bit out there - fair enough. It is referenced extensively in the Bible (Old testament). The Greeks - Diodorus, Cleitarchus and Plato as well as the Romans - Plutarch, Livy and Tertullian, all wrote about it, and for most of modern history all of this was dismissed as ancient propaganda. Until the 20th century when archaeologists started digging up the remains of thousands of infants at sacred sites across what was their empire. Gezer - 1902, Megiddo - 1925, Hazor - 1955, Jericho - 1952, Ugarit - 1929, Carthage Tophet - 1921, Tel Dan - 1966. So yeah, it's very real. And it has been a recurring theme wherever Jews have lived among us: Simon of Trent - 1475, William of Norwich - 1144, Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln - 1255, Werner of Oberwesel - 1287, Andrel von Rinn - 1462 and dozens more. These are just the times they got caught though, but Jews would say wrongfully persecuted. I guess today we have planned parenthood. This subject is a pandora's box though, opening it would add another 10,000 words to make a dent. The Canaanites (Phoenicians, Carthaginians, Levantines) being positioned for world dominance before being properly introduced to Europeans. Alexander the Great giving them a hiding early on and subsequently Hollywood and entertainment tirelessly painting him as a homosexual today. The Punic Wars, the Jewish revolts and expulsions, the first bubonic plague from Egypt (most people aren't aware we've had 2). The Talmudic origins of the Quran and the Jewish association with Mohammed before Islam ravaged Christendom in the South, as well as the Jewish presence near the Huns before Attila ravaged the North. The IRRECONCILABLE PARADOX in the modern Jews claim of being God's chosen ones when they have Canaanite blood in their veins and, in Deuteronomy 7, God very clearly commanded the complete annihilation of Canaanites. Of course, when you are going this far back there is typically a lot more extrapolation and speculation involved, but when you work backwards from what you know as fact today then the dots jump out at you; you can pick up any page from history and find it dripping with Jewry. I am fairly certain you are not quite ready to take the Christ plunge, so I won't harp on here, but I am here should you ever want to explore it. "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he wasn't real" - and of course that one would come straight out of Hollywood.

Maybe we keep it simple. How about sports? NFL, NBA, football.. I mean, it's not really my thing, certainly no expert, but I'll give it a crack.... Who won the coin toss? Coin toss...? Isn't it interesting that you could pick out any team from any league and it'd be a coin toss as to whether or not it's owned by a Jew, and that somehow 80% of the players are African. Fuck, there I go. There's a quote that's be circulating since the 1950s that I've been very reluctant to include. It's not outright debunked but its footing is pretty shaky, and everything else in here is concrete. It's attributed to Israel Cohen in a book he allegedly wrote in 1912 - 'A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century'. I can't find this book though, and as far as I'm aware no one else has either, or I would have found them; but that doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't or didn't exist. It was read into Congressional Record on June 7, 1957, by Rep. Thomas Abernethy during a debate on the Civil Rights Act. I can find the Congressional Record (same date - Volume 103, Part 7, page 8559), it does stack up with what other Jews like Kalergi and Kaufman have said, and when you look at how things played out since then - the glove certainly fits (OJ). Anyway, with that said here it is: “We must realise that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instil in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” Obviously that would naturally flow on to music. It's also no secret that Jews are massively overrepresented in music. 60% of the top roles in the most prominent labels today, 70% when you expand that to key figures both historic and today. Atlantic Records, Def Jam, Warner Records. Africans think they gave you hip hop and RnB? Nah, that was the Jews Herb Abramson, Jerry Wexler and Rick Rubin. What are some of the masterpieces they've given us just these last 5 years: "Wet Ass Pussy", "Slut Me Out", "Thot Shit", "Anaconda", "Bitch Better Have My Money", "Good Puss", "Pussy Talk", "Boss Bitch" and many, many more. It's a real race to the bottom. And then you've got the tendrils of feminism, "empowering" all those young girls, in a pill induced haze, to get up and twerk like their 30's aren't around the corner. And the younger ones, still in school - what kind of outlook are these setting them up for? Sure, It wasn't always this bad, but it's been growing exponentially worse. Why don't we rewind to the hippie era, the "free love". That was a pivotal moment, and not just for the music scene today but a number of these pillars - feminism, pornography, the rejection of Christianity, the progression to multiculturalism and many other "civil rights" and "progressive" movements would have found their greatest proponents from this era. How about we go back to Woodstock, 1969? That's a milestone, if there ever were one, for that time. Well fuck mate, Michael Lang was Jewish - the guy who conceptualised and organised it all. He was backed by Jewish financiers - John Roberts and Joel Rosenman. They even did it on a Jewish farm - Max Yasgur's. Half a million people turned that paddock into a muddy ruin and those kids, with all the LSD going around, we're happy to roll around in like pigs in a sty. And LSD was HUGE there, they were handing it out like water at a marathon. The agreed upon figure is about 90% of them were doin LSD there. You know where else it was huge? 15 years prior in the CIA's mind-control experiment - MKUltra - headed up by the JEW Sidney Gottlieb. Maybe you've come across that hippie today, with a vague grasp on some of the MKUltra stuff, and he'll say something like "isn't it like.. totally iconic that like the government was making this stuff to control us.. and now we like just use it to reach a higher level" - yeah, that's not what happened you drug-addled degenerate, you took the bait - hook, line and sinker.

What about BLM and the "mostly peaceful" riots? Can't talk about that without mentioning who funded them - George Soros, born György Schwartz – Jew. How about slavery then? That's pretty topical these days, and their real silver bullet as to why white people are so evil. Are you ready for that big reveal? This one's probably going to blow your socks off, but most of those slaves were coming across on Jewish merchant vessels - you can read Tony Martin's (turns out I like some Africans) - 1993 'The Jewish Onslaught'. In fact you can go look up the 'Jewish Encyclopedia' and read their own boasts about having a "controlling interest in the cotton industry" and a "monopoly on sugar plantations". This might not mean too much to you without further context, so here it is: these were by far the most labour intensive crops - slave labour. Cotton accounted for 18% of all slaves, sugar dwarfed it at 60%. In contrast, tobacco, which was all us WASP's, used 2-3%. Here's the kicker: And I know how much you Brits like irony, so you're going to love this one. In 1833 you guys passed the 'Slavery Abolition Act'. You borrowed £20m, 40% of your budget (40% would be over £300B today), from Nathan Mayer Rothschild and Moses Montefiore in order to compensate slave owners so that they would free their slaves. A debt which you've just finished paying back in 2015, just in time for BLM. That is: the British government borrowed money from Jews, to pay to other Jews to give up their slaves so that the Jewish lenders could tax farm (economic slavery) the British citizens, who never owned any slaves, for 182 years. And what thanks do you get? Look out your window. Mother of 3, Natalie Shotter, orally raped to death on a park bench. There's your fucking thanks.. The Jews though, they got a pretty good deal, surely there's some appreciation? Let's check in with Jon Stuart (that would be Jonathan Leibowitz): well, as his white alter ego he says "Black people should hate white people. We ruin everything. We're dicks" and then when he assumes his true Jewish form he says "Jews and Blacks shouldn't fight. We should get together and get whitey." Yeah, I wouldn't hold my breath for their appreciation either. It's their BLM, their CRT, their media and entertainment pinning their actions on us.

Christ mate, I see what you're getting at. Pretty hard for me to not to bring it back to Jews. Might as well just talk about the holocaust.. well, I'm sorry mate - Just like everything else around you, that too is a Jewish lie. Their magnum opus really. From the moment you enter this world it's hammered down your throat from all angles - media, entertainment, education to the general kvetching of Jews. It's their ace in the hole, the ultimate trump card, to shut down any legitimate criticism of Jewish behaviour. It's the event that creates that deafening silence whenever someone drops the word Jew at the table. It enables them to drink from your cup and then look you dead in the eye as they dip their cock in it, before handing it back and you thanking them. A wooden door on a gas chamber. Crematory technology that doesn't exist today. The Red Cross' own estimates of 271,000 dead from typhus and starvation, with the Germans persistently appealing to them for support with a situation they had lost control of due to relentless allied bombing of civilian infrastructure, all while they were continuously trying to surrender. Jews put a bunch of old shoes in a glass box and suddenly whites can't have a country anymore. Though there were some very real genocides and atrocities that took place then. I'm sure any day now the Jews in Hollywood will release a film on the Holodomor or the Red Terror, Dresden or the Rape of Berlin. 30 million white Christians exterminated by Jewish Bolsheviks through manufactured famines or just wholesale murder. German girls and women, from 6 years old to 60, with a backlog of Siberians 10-20 deep waiting to get in there and rape them. Swastikas carved into their flesh, some so deep their intestines protruded. The wave of mass suicides that followed. You'll never hear about that. And obviously this is another pandora's box that would blow this thing into a novel. You'll need a VPN over there, but you can go and watch Europa (watcheuropa.com). There are some inaccuracies in it, but nothing that dismantles its core. Or you can look up the late David Irving, British WWII revisionist, who was a world renowned and respected historian, until he started poking holes in the Holocaust - then he faced a 3 year prison sentence, hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, his books pulled from libraries and was banned from entering numerous countries. You are free to deny any other genocide in history, but if you question their Holocaust... Doesn't look at all like Jews are running the show.

Of course if you ask Alex Jones then it's the Illuminati or the Chinese, which I'm sure has nothing to do with his Jewish wife. If you ask Trump then its the Democrats, and I'm sure that has nothing to do with all his Jewish sons and daughters in law. If you asked Biden, and he could get a sentence together, he would say it's the Republicans, and that too would have nothing to do with all his Jewish sons and daughters in law. If you asked Kamala she'd say the same, and that wouldn't have anything to do with her Jewish husband. If you asked Musk, he'd tell you its the "woke mind-virus", and that wouldn't have anything to do with his 3 Jewish baby mamas. And if you asked Starmer, well he'd probably check in with his Jewish wife and then tell you it's the far-right.

So do I talk about the Jews a lot? Yeah, that's fair, but can you blame me? Once you start pulling on that thread, the whole curtain unravels and when you see what's on the other side, you're left in awe of just how Jewish it all is. 0.2% of the population. You're a numbers guy, what do you think those odds are of all of it being coincidence? And I get it, you barge in shooting all this from the hip and to a lot of people that's going to raise some serious red flags, but some things need to be brought to light. They're everywhere and in everything. Henry Ford didn't write his piece - 'The International Jew, the Worlds Foremost Problem' in 1920 (5 years before Mein Kampf) without inspiration. Let's pull out a section: "It is rather surprising, is it not, that which ever way you turn to trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society, you come upon a group of Jews. In sports corruption, a group of Jews. In exploiting finance, a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy, a group of Jews. In liquor propaganda, a group of Jews. Absolutely dominating the wireless communications of the world, a group of Jews. The menace of the movies, a group of Jews. In control of the press through business and financial pressure, a group of Jews. War profiteers, 80% of them, Jews. The [mesmerism] of so-called popular music, which combines weak mindedness with every suggestion of lewdness, Jews. Organizations of anti-Christian laws and customs, again Jews. It is time to show that the cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots. There is a religious prejudice in this country; there is indeed a religious persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the religious liberties of the majority of the people. And this prejudice and persecution and use of force is Jewish and nothing but Jewish." Four years after that (still a year before part 1 of Mein Kampf) in 1924, Maurice Samuel, Jewish Zionist, published his book 'You Gentiles' where he wrote: "We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build"

And while Hollywood and the media like to paint us as some kind of inbred swamp dwellers, the truth is that some of the greatest minds throughout history have been on our side of the line. Obviously we've got Ford, but lets take a look at just a few of the others. Voltaire, the French Enlightenment philosopher who championed reason and liberty and said “To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticise?” (Is it the white man that you can't criticise?). He said in his 1763 'Treatise on Tolerance' (a PRO-TOLERANCE book): “The Jews have always been hated, and with reason, for their laws… which make them enemies of the human race.”. Immanuel Kant, the German philosopher who gave us the 'Critique of Pure Reason', called Jews a nation of cheaters with a parasitic trade ethic, unfit for citizenship. Richard Wagner, German Composer who revolutionised opera, blamed Jews for corrupting German culture. Houston Stewart Chamberlain, British-German writer, said: "The Jew is the anti-race, the plastic demon of the decay of peoples… His blood is poison to ours, his spirit a ferment of decomposition.” and: “The Jew is the eternal parasite, incapable of creating, only destroying… His presence in Europe is a plague, a racial cancer to be excised.”. Thomas Stearns Eliot, American-British poet who shaped modernist literature, called Jews a cultural threat, undermining Christian society. Ezra Pound, American poet and key modernist figure, said during WWII radio broadcasts that Jews were responsible for war and capitalism, and that they were a plague that had been interned for treason. Bobby Fischer, the greatest grand master in chess of all time, with the greatest pattern recognition in history, blamed the Jews for everything. Of course he was a Jew, but don't tell him I said that. Strongly denouncing his Jewish roots, he converted to Christianity and, after dominating the chess scene, dedicated his life as a one man Crusade against international Jewry. It is even fair for us to claim Aristotle, who said that democracy is only possible within homogeneous ethnic groups, while despots have always ruled over highly fragmented societies. And, of course, highest of all, Jesus Christ - who flipped the tables of the money lenders and commanded them to leave his Fathers' house. Who said to the Jews "You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

Contrary to the stigma of being a "Neo-Nazi", I consider myself fairly open-minded. Doesn't mean I want to suck a dick or mess around with gender roles, but in the more traditionalist sense; I will listen to opposing views and parse the information to determine for myself what is true and what is false. And I am very much aware of how bias can skew that filtering process. I can remember the first time, maybe 15 years ago, someone presented me with the 'Jewish Question' challenging the WWII narrative, and I pushed back hard; but I didn't shut them off or block them out. And while I wasn't converted then and there, I did drop my guard (my bias) to the Jewish angle and start probing around there, and now, well, here we are. And I've seen this bias time and time again throughout the years, the second you mention Jews most people turtle up and stonewall you. In the past I've even gone so far as to claim Jewish ancestry myself to try and get the message through; people tend to have a lot more tolerance for self-deprecating Jews than they do for antisemites. Only seems fair though, given how often they appeal to their "fellow whites". And you are right, I am in a privileged position. I wouldn't frame it that way personally, nothing was handed to me and it wasn't a right of passage, I certainly didn't get any windfall of inheritance either; my old man was bankrupt on his way out and I was helping him with cash I didn't have - but the term works for the purpose; I'm not waking up in the morning to slam some coffee and rush out the door to spend the day locked in a office, coming home that evening exhausted to eat some dinner, watch some trash and then sleep, only to wake up and repeat the process. While people can handle that and maintain optics on what's going on around them to varying degrees, there's an undeniable handicap there to that end. You've got blinkers on and focused on what's ahead of you to get through the day, and I'm not suggesting that's inherently bad either but "you can't see the forest for the trees". On the other side of that spectrum I am privileged. Privileged with the luxury of time and freedom to spend it as I see fit. That freedom and time have given me a greater opportunity to view and examine things from a much wider lens, and I have seen fit to take advantage of that. That said, show me where I am wrong and I will gladly change my views.

Am I being consumed by it? I don't know. It definitely takes up a lot of time and energy. It's basically a 9-5 with more sporadic hours and entirely pro bono. It's not all that's going on. I certainly love my motorcycles and flying to detach, not just from this but, from an array of things. Let's say that's a fair observation to make, then I'd turn it around and say, well, quite clearly we are being consumed; so what does it matter if I am consumed by this or that? At least on this path I might contribute. At least at the end of this road, however long or short and wherever it might lead, when I am called for my final judgement, I can say I tried. That's by no means some proclamation of me being a saint, I'm sure we're both aware that I'll also have some explaining to do up there. As for alienating myself, well, in the words of Marcus Aurelius: "The objective in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding one's self in the ranks of the insane". Would you describe what's happening in the West as sane? Is it sane to just go along with it? Do you really believe that one day you're going to walk into a voting booth, tick a box, and suddenly everything is fixed? Why do you think they took all your guns? Maybe you're still having fun, I don't know.. Do you think I'd be having fun watching a bunch of Africans kick a ball around? Listen to Piers Morgan complain that the new manager is German. To be fair though, I probably still wouldn't give a shit even if they were all white.

Do you think I'm not going to notice when I'm picking my kids up from school that 80% of their peers aren't white? Do you think you wont? Your 10 year old son, sitting in the back, covered in rainbows and glitter, because it's pride month and his transgender teacher is diverting all learning to indoctrination - and you can't say anything because you're on your 3rd strike with the school board, and the next step is to evaluate state custody. Take him to the movies to watch some sassy African emoji, who is going to lecture him for an hour on how horrible white people are, watching his little soul start to buckle under the weight of it. Do you think there will be some kind of floor, when whites become a minority beyond a certain threshold, that all this anti-white shit will simply stop? I think it's far more rational to say it will accelerate more the weaker we get, as it has been. There's a reason some Jewish groups call out Orwell's 1984 as antisemitic - because it is. No, I would sooner die alone on this hill than come back to what you might call "the party" - it's just not for me mate. Though, I'm not alone on this hill. While it's true that this path has strained some relationships and others have completely disintegrated; not that I ever presented any hostility to these people. On the flip side of that, other relationships are stronger than they've ever been and some completely new ones have formed. What's that expression? "One door closes and another opens". And while I do appreciate your concern, as I'm sure it genuinely comes from good place; I hope that you can now appreciate mine.

That's it, that's me, I've said my piece. I could sit here and hammer out another 6,000,000 words on the subjects, but I'm exhausted. And honestly mate, If it hasn't clicked yet then I doubt that'd make the difference - "You can lead a horse to water..." To answer your other question: no I haven't made it to Germany yet. I got held up with a few things here and had to shoot over to Melbourne for a bit. Will probably have to move the snowboarding to Norway. I've also almost completely neglected the gym since Christmas, and I'd like to get a few solid weeks in before I go. Just to get a bit more spring in my step, you know.. in case some sand monkey tries to run me down with his car ;)

Your Friend,

Alec