<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>tokenstock</title>
        <link>https://paragraph.com/@tokenstock</link>
        <description>Simple hub for crypto.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:38:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>All rights reserved</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Test. Bitcoin WP]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@tokenstock/test-bitcoin-wp</link>
            <guid>k1iSKMvAOjchLeYapUMq</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 20:38:07 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-ba...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.</p><figure float="none" data-type="figure" class="img-center" style="max-width: null;"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/6968c6f083bfdea4b194849c0f9be129a000d85dd4fb8d04cfc98e0e7d2a0e27.png" alt="" blurdataurl="" nextheight="600" nextwidth="800" class="image-node embed"><figcaption HTMLAttributes="[object Object]" class="hide-figcaption"></figcaption></figure><p>The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they&apos;ll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers.</p><p>The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>tokenstock@newsletter.paragraph.com (tokenstock)</author>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>