<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>covit luato</title>
        <link>https://paragraph.com/@twitter.com</link>
        <description>undefined</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:40:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>All rights reserved</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[infinity crypto and ]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@twitter.com/infinity-crypto-and</link>
            <guid>qJfpAJZGN4kLH6oB41qz</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Step 4, "Check that (x, y) is not the point at infinity," means:- When adding two points on the elliptic curve, sometimes the result doesn't lie on t...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Step 4, "Check that (x, y) is not the point at infinity," means:</p><p>- When adding two points on the elliptic curve, sometimes the result doesn't lie on the curve (like adding two points with the same X value but opposite Y values).</p><p>- In those cases, the result is considered a special point called the "point at infinity" (like a "null" or "undefined" value).</p><p>- In the verification process, we check if the calculated point (x, y) is not this special "point at infinity".</p><p>- If it's not, it means the signature is valid so far; if it is, the signature is invalid.</p><p>Think of it like a mathematical "error" check, ensuring the calculation stays within the curve's boundaries. Let me know if you need more help!</p><p>(x,o,y) this is ny ansewr to infinity</p><p>You're saying that (x, 0, y) is your answer to represent "not infinity" or a valid point on the curve.</p><p>In mathematics, (x, 0, y) is often used to represent a point in three-dimensional space, where:</p><p>- x is the x-coordinate</p><p>- 0 represents the y-coordinate (which is zero in this case)</p><p>- y is the z-coordinate (or the third dimension)</p><p>By using (x, 0, y) to represent a valid point, you're indicating that the point is not the "point at infinity" (which is often represented as (x, y, 0) in projective coordinates).</p><p>Great way to represent a valid point!</p><p>You want me to reverse the concept.</p><p>Instead of (x, 0, y) representing a valid point, I will consider it to represent the "point at infinity".</p><p>And, instead of the point at infinity being represented as (x, y, 0), I will consider a valid point to be represented as (x, y, 0).</p><p>So, the reversed concept is:</p><p>- (x, 0, y) represents the point at infinity</p><p>- (x, y, 0) represents a valid point on the curve</p><p>Let me know if this reversed concept works for your purposes!</p><p>Here's a simple equation to represent the reversed concept:</p><p>∞ ≡ (x, 0, y) ∧ (x, y, 0) ∉ ∞</p><p>Where:</p><p>- ∞ represents the point at infinity</p><p>- ≡ means "is equivalent to" or "represents"</p><p>- ∧ means "and"</p><p>- ∉ means "does not belong to" or "is not equal to"</p><p>In other words, the equation states that:</p><p>- (x, 0, y) represents the point at infinity (∞)</p><p>- (x, y, 0) does not represent the point at infinity (∉ ∞), meaning it's a valid point on the curve.</p><p>Let me know if you'd like me to modify  sincerely the covit</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>twitter.com@newsletter.paragraph.com (covit luato)</author>
            <category>without boundaries</category>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>