<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>wwwwwwwww</title>
        <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww</link>
        <description>eeeeeee</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:26:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>All rights reserved</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[After such terrible accusations, it is time to hear what his patron Casaubon can allege in his defence.]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/after-such-terrible-accusations-it-is-time-to-hear-what-his-patron-casaubon-can-allege-in-his-defence</link>
            <guid>Bv0afXdoScDSGgAGdN0H</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2022 09:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Instead of answering, he excuses for the most part; and when he cannot, accuses others of the same crimes. He deals with Scaliger as a modest scholar with a master. He compliments him with so much reverence that one would swear he feared him as much at least as he respected him. Scaliger will not allow Persius to have any wit; Casaubon interprets this in the mildest sense, and confesses his author was not good at turning things into a pleasant ridicule, or, in other words, that he was not a l...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of answering, he excuses for the most part; and when he cannot, accuses others of the same crimes. He deals with Scaliger as a modest scholar with a master. He compliments him with so much reverence that one would swear he feared him as much at least as he respected him. Scaliger will not allow Persius to have any wit; Casaubon interprets this in the mildest sense, and confesses his author was not good at turning things into a pleasant ridicule, or, in other words, that he was not a laughable writer. That he was ineptus, indeed, but that was non aptissimus ad jocandum; but that he was ostentatious of his learning, that by Scaliger&apos;s good favour he denies. Persius showed his learning, but was no boaster of it; he did ostendere, but not ostentare; and so, he says, did Scaliger (where, methinks, Casaubon turns it handsomely upon that supercilious critic, and silently insinuates that he himself was sufficiently vain-glorious and a boaster of his own knowledge). All the writings of this venerable censor, continues Casaubon, which are [Greek text which cannot be reproduced] (more golden than gold itself), are everywhere smelling of that thyme which, like a bee, he has gathered from ancient authors; but far be ostentation and vain-glory from a gentleman so well born and so nobly educated as Scaliger. But, says Scaliger, he is so obscure that he has got himself the name of Scotinus--a dark writer. &quot;Now,&quot; says Casaubon, &quot;it is a wonder to me that anything could be obscure to the divine wit of Scaliger, from which nothing could be hidden.&quot; This is, indeed, a strong compliment, but no defence; and Casaubon, who could not but be sensible of his author&apos;s blind side, thinks it time to abandon a post that was untenable. He acknowledges that Persius is obscure in some places; but so is Plato, so is Thucydides; so are Pindar, Theocritus, and Aristophanes amongst the Greek poets; and even Horace and Juvenal, he might have added, amongst the Romans. The truth is, Persius is not sometimes, but generally obscure; and therefore Casaubon at last is forced to excuse him by alleging that it was se defendendo, for fear of Nero, and that he was commanded to write so cloudily by Cornutus, in virtue of holy obedience to his master. I cannot help my own opinion; I think Cornutus needed not to have read many lectures to him on that subject. Persius was an apt scholar, and when he was bidden to be obscure in some places where his life and safety were in question, took the same counsel for all his book, and never afterwards wrote ten lines together clearly. Casaubon, being upon this chapter, has not failed, we may be sure, of making a compliment to his own dear comment. &quot;If Persius,&quot; says he, &quot;be in himself obscure, yet my interpretation has made him intelligible.&quot; There is no question but he deserves that praise which he has given to himself; but the nature of the thing, as Lucretius says, will not admit of a perfect explanation. Besides many examples which I could urge, the very last verse of his last satire (upon which he particularly values himself in his preface) is not yet sufficiently explicated. It is true, Holyday has endeavoured to justify his construction; but Stelluti is against it: and, for my part, I can have but a very dark notion of it. As for the chastity of his thoughts, Casaubon denies not but that one particular passage in the fourth satire (At, si unctus cesses, &amp;c.) is not only the most obscure, but the most obscene, of all his works. I understood it, but for that reason turned it over. In defence of his boisterous metaphors he quotes Longinus, who accounts them as instruments of the sublime, fit to move and stir up the affections, particularly in narration; to which it may be replied that where the trope is far- fetched and hard, it is fit for nothing but to puzzle the understanding, and may be reckoned amongst those things of Demosthenes which AEschines called [Greek text which cannot be reproduced] not [Greek text which cannot be reproduced]--that is, prodigies, not words. It must be granted to Casaubon that the knowledge of many things is lost in our modern ages which were of familiar notice to the ancients, and that satire is a poem of a difficult nature in itself, and is not written to vulgar readers; and (through the relation which it has to comedy) the frequent change of persons makes the sense perplexed, when we can but divine who it is that speaks--whether Persius himself, or his friend and monitor, or, in some places, a third person. But Casaubon comes back always to himself, and concludes that if Persius had not been obscure, there had been no need of him for an interpreter. Yet when he had once enjoined himself so hard a task, he then considered the Greek proverb, that he must [Greek text which cannot be reproduced] (either eat the whole snail or let it quite alone); and so he went through with his laborious task, as I have done with my difficult translation.</p><p>Thus far, my lord, you see it has gone very hard with Persius. I think he cannot be allowed to stand in competition either with Juvenal or Horace. Yet, for once, I will venture to be so vain as to affirm that none of his hard metaphors or forced expressions are in my translation. But more of this in its proper place, where I shall say somewhat in particular of our general performance in making these two authors English. In the meantime I think myself obliged to give Persius his undoubted due, and to acquaint the world, with Casaubon, in what he has equalled and in what excelled his two competitors.</p><p>A man who is resolved to praise an author with any appearance of justice must be sure to take him on the strongest side, and where he is least liable to exceptions; he is therefore obliged to choose his mediums accordingly. Casaubon (who saw that Persius could not laugh with a becoming grace, that he was not made for jesting, and that a merry conceit was not his talent) turned his feather, like an Indian, to another light, that he might give it the better gloss. &quot;Moral doctrine,&quot; says he, &quot;and urbanity or well-mannered wit are the two things which constitute the Roman satire; but of the two, that which is most essential to this poem, and is, as it were, the very soul which animates it, is the scourging of vice and exhortation to virtue.&quot; Thus wit, for a good reason, is already almost out of doors, and allowed only for an instrument--a kind of tool or a weapon, as he calls it--of which the satirist makes use in the compassing of his design. The end and aim of our three rivals is consequently the same; but by what methods they have prosecuted their intention is further to be considered. Satire is of the nature of moral philosophy, as being instructive; he therefore who instructs most usefully will carry the palm from his two antagonists. The philosophy in which Persius was educated, and which he professes through his whole book, is the Stoic--the most noble, most generous, most beneficial to humankind amongst all the sects who have given us the rules of ethics, thereby to form a severe virtue in the soul, to raise in us an undaunted courage against the assaults of fortune, to esteem as nothing the things that are without us, because they are not in our power; not to value riches, beauty, honours, fame, or health any farther than as conveniences and so many helps to living as we ought, and doing good in our generation. In short, to be always happy while we possess our minds with a good conscience, are free from the slavery of vices, and conform our actions and conversation to the rules of right reason. See here, my lord, an epitome of Epictetus, the doctrine of Zeno, and the education of our Persius; and this he expressed, not only in all his satires, but in the manner of his life. I will not lessen this commendation of the Stoic philosophy by giving you an account of some absurdities in their doctrine, and some perhaps impieties (if we consider them by the standard of Christian faith). Persius has fallen into none of them, and therefore is free from those imputations. What he teaches might be taught from pulpits with more profit to the audience than all the nice speculations of divinity and controversies concerning faith, which are more for the profit of the shepherd than for the edification of the flock. Passion, interest, ambition, and all their bloody consequences of discord and of war are banished from this doctrine. Here is nothing proposed but the quiet and tranquillity of the mind; virtue lodged at home, and afterwards diffused in her general effects to the improvement and good of humankind. And therefore I wonder not that the present Bishop of Salisbury has recommended this our author and the tenth satire of Juvenal (in his pastoral letter) to the serious perusal and practice of the divines in his diocese as the best commonplaces for their sermons, as the storehouses and magazines of moral virtues, from whence they may draw out, as they have occasion, all manner of assistance for the accomplishment of a virtuous life, which the Stoics have assigned for the great end and perfection of mankind. Herein, then, it is that Persius has excelled both Juvenal and Horace. He sticks to his own philosophy; he shifts not sides, like Horace (who is sometimes an Epicurean, sometimes a Stoic, sometimes an Eclectic, as his present humour leads him), nor declaims, like Juvenal, against vices more like an orator than a philosopher. Persius is everywhere the same--true to the dogmas of his master. What he has learnt, he teaches vehemently; and what he teaches, that he practises himself. There is a spirit of sincerity in all he says; you may easily discern that he is in earnest, and is persuaded of that truth which he inculcates. In this I am of opinion that he excels Horace, who is commonly in jest, and laughs while he instructs; and is equal to Juvenal, who was as honest and serious as Persius, and more he could not be.</p><p>Hitherto I have followed Casaubon, and enlarged upon him, because I am satisfied that he says no more than truth; the rest is almost all frivolous. For he says that Horace, being the son of a tax-gatherer (or a collector, as we call it) smells everywhere of the meanness of his birth and education; his conceits are vulgar, like the subjects of his satires; that he does plebeium sepere, and writes not with that elevation which becomes a satirist; that Persius, being nobly born and of an opulent family, had likewise the advantage of a better master (Cornutus being the most learned of his time, a man of a most holy life, the chief of the Stoic sect at Rome, and not only a great philosopher, but a poet himself, and in probability a coadjutor of Persius: that as for Juvenal, he was long a declaimer, came late to poetry, and had not been much conversant in philosophy.</p><p>It is granted that the father of Horace was libertinus--that is, one degree removed from his grandfather, who had been once a slave. But Horace, speaking of him, gives him the best character of a father which I ever read in history; and I wish a witty friend of mine, now living, had such another. He bred him in the best school, and with the best company of young noblemen; and Horace, by his gratitude to his memory, gives a certain testimony that his education was ingenuous. After this he formed himself abroad by the conversation of great men. Brutus found him at Athens, and was so pleased with him that he took him thence into the army, and made him Tribunus Militum (a colonel in a legion), which was the preferment of an old soldier. All this was before his acquaintance with Maecenas, and his introduction into the court of Augustus, and the familiarity of that great emperor; which, had he not been well bred before, had been enough to civilise his conversation, and render him accomplished and knowing in all the arts of complacency and good behaviour; and, in short, an agreeable companion for the retired hours and privacies of a favourite who was first minister. So that upon the whole matter Persius may be acknowledged to be equal with him in those respects, though better born, and Juvenal inferior to both. If the advantage be anywhere, it is on the side of Horace, as much as the court of Augustus Caesar was superior to that of Nero. As for the subjects which they treated, it will appear hereafter that Horace wrote not vulgarly on vulgar subjects, nor always chose them. His style is constantly accommodated to his subject, either high or low. If his fault be too much lowness, that of Persius is the fault of the hardness of his metaphors and obscurity; and so they are equal in the failings of their style, where Juvenal manifestly triumphs over both of them.</p><p>The comparison betwixt Horace and Juvenal is more difficult, because their forces were more equal. A dispute has always been, and ever will continue, betwixt the favourers of the two poets. Non nostrum est tantas componere lites. I shall only venture to give my own opinion, and leave it for better judges to determine. If it be only argued in general which of them was the better poet, the victory is already gained on the side of Horace. Virgil himself must yield to him in the delicacy of his turns, his choice of words, and perhaps the purity of his Latin. He who says that Pindar is inimitable, is himself inimitable in his odes; but the contention betwixt these two great masters is for the prize of satire, in which controversy all the odes and epodes of Horace are to stand excluded. I say this because Horace has written many of them satirically against his private enemies; yet these, if justly considered, are somewhat of the nature of the Greek silli, which were invectives against particular sects and persons. But Horace had purged himself of this choler before he entered on those discourses which are more properly called the Roman satire. He has not now to do with a Lyce, a Canidia, a Cassius Severus, or a Menas; but is to correct the vices and the follies of his time, and to give the rules of a happy and virtuous life. In a word, that former sort of satire which is known in England by the name of lampoon is a dangerous sort of weapon, and for the most part unlawful. We have no moral right on the reputation of other men; it is taking from them what we cannot restore to them. There are only two reasons for which we may be permitted to write lampoons, and I will not promise that they can always justify us. The first is revenge, when we have been affronted in the same nature, or have been anywise notoriously abused, and can make ourselves no other reparation. And yet we know that in Christian charity all offences are to be forgiven, as we expect the like pardon for those which we daily commit against Almighty God. And this consideration has often made me tremble when I was saying our Saviour&apos;s prayer, for the plain condition of the forgiveness which we beg is the pardoning of others the offences which they have done to us; for which reason I have many times avoided the commission of that fault, even when I have been notoriously provoked. Let not this, my lord, pass for vanity in me; for it is truth. More libels have been written against me than almost any man now living; and I had reason on my side to have defended my own innocence. I speak not of my poetry, which I have wholly given up to the critics--let them use it as they please-- posterity, perhaps, may be more favourable to me; for interest and passion will lie buried in another age, and partiality and prejudice be forgotten. I speak of my morals, which have been sufficiently aspersed--that only sort of reputation ought to be dear to every honest man, and is to me. But let the world witness for me that I have been often wanting to myself in that particular; I have seldom answered any scurrilous lampoon when it was in my power to have exposed my enemies; and, being naturally vindicative, have suffered in silence, and possessed my soul in quiet.</p><p>Anything, though never so little, which a man speaks of himself, in my opinion, is still too much; and therefore I will waive this subject, and proceed to give the second reason which may justify a poet when he writes against a particular person, and that is when he is become a public nuisance. All those whom Horace in his satires, and Persius and Juvenal have mentioned in theirs with a brand of infamy, are wholly such. It is an action of virtue to make examples of vicious men. They may and ought to be upbraided with their crimes and follies, both for their own amendment (if they are not yet incorrigible), and for the terror of others, to hinder them from falling into those enormities, which they see are so severely punished in the persons of others. The first reason was only an excuse for revenge; but this second is absolutely of a poet&apos;s office to perform. But how few lampooners are there now living who are capable of this duty! When they come in my way, it is impossible sometimes to avoid reading them. But, good God! how remote they are in common justice from the choice of such persons as are the proper subject of satire, and how little wit they bring for the support of their injustice! The weaker sex is their most ordinary theme; and the best and fairest are sure to be the most severely handled. Amongst men, those who are prosperously unjust are entitled to a panegyric, but afflicted virtue is insolently stabbed with all manner of reproaches; no decency is considered, no fulsomeness omitted; no venom is wanting, as far as dulness can supply it, for there is a perpetual dearth of wit, a barrenness of good sense and entertainment. The neglect of the readers will soon put an end to this sort of scribbling. There can be no pleasantry where there is no wit, no impression can be made where there is no truth for the foundation. To conclude: they are like the fruits of the earth in this unnatural season; the corn which held up its head is spoiled with rankness, but the greater part of the harvest is laid along, and little of good income and wholesome nourishment is received into the barns. This is almost a digression, I confess to your lordship; but a just indignation forced it from me. Now I have removed this rubbish I will return to the comparison of Juvenal and Horace.</p><p>I would willingly divide the palm betwixt them upon the two heads of profit and delight, which are the two ends of poetry in general. It must be granted by the favourers of Juvenal that Horace is the more copious and more profitable in his instructions of human life; but in my particular opinion, which I set not up for a standard to better judgments, Juvenal is the more delightful author. I am profited by both, I am pleased with both; but I owe more to Horace for my instruction, and more to Juvenal for my pleasure. This, as I said, is my particular taste of these two authors. They who will have either of them to excel the other in both qualities, can scarce give better reasons for their opinion than I for mine. But all unbiassed readers will conclude that my moderation is not to be condemned; to such impartial men I must appeal, for they who have already formed their judgment may justly stand suspected of prejudice; and though all who are my readers will set up to be my judges, I enter my caveat against them, that they ought not so much as to be of my jury; or; if they be admitted, it is but reason that they should first hear what I have to urge in the defence of my opinion.</p><p>That Horace is somewhat the better instructor of the two is proved from hence--that his instructions are more general, Juvenal&apos;s more limited. So that, granting that the counsels which they give are equally good for moral use, Horace, who gives the most various advice, and most applicable to all occasions which can occur to us in the course of our lives--as including in his discourses not only all the rules of morality, but also of civil conversation--is undoubtedly to be preferred to him, who is more circumscribed in his instructions, makes them to fewer people, and on fewer occasions, than the other. I may be pardoned for using an old saying, since it is true and to the purpose: Bonum quo communius, eo melius. Juvenal, excepting only his first satire, is in all the rest confined to the exposing of some particular vice; that he lashes, and there he sticks. His sentences are truly shining and instructive; but they are sprinkled here and there. Horace is teaching us in every line, and is perpetually moral; he had found out the skill of Virgil to hide his sentences, to give you the virtue of them without showing them in their full extent, which is the ostentation of a poet, and not his art. And this Petronius charges on the authors of his time as a vice of writing, which was then growing on the age: ne sententiae extra corpus orationis emineant; he would have them weaved into the body of the work, and not appear embossed upon it, and striking directly on the reader&apos;s view. Folly was the proper quarry of Horace, and not vice; and as there are but few notoriously wicked men in comparison with a shoal of fools and fops, so it is a harder thing to make a man wise than to make him honest; for the will is only to be reclaimed in the one, but the understanding is to be informed in the other. There are blind sides and follies even in the professors of moral philosophy, and there is not any one sect of them that Horace has not exposed; which, as it was not the design of Juvenal, who was wholly employed in lashing vices (some of them the most enormous that can be imagined), so perhaps it was not so much his talent.</p><p>&quot;Omne vafer vitium ridenti Flaccus amico Tangit, et admissus circum praecordia ludit.&quot;</p><p>This was the commendation which Persius gave him; where by vitium he means those little vices which we call follies, the defects of human understanding, or at most the peccadilloes of life, rather than the tragical vices to which men are hurried by their unruly passions and exorbitant desires. But in the word omne, which is universal, he concludes with me that the divine wit of Horace left nothing untouched; that he entered into the inmost recesses of nature; found out the imperfections even of the most wise and grave, as well as of the common people; discovering even in the great Trebatius (to whom he addresses the first satire) his hunting after business and following the court, as well as in the prosecutor Crispinus, his impertinence and importunity. It is true, he exposes Crispinus openly as a common nuisance; but he rallies the other, as a friend, more finely. The exhortations of Persius are confined to noblemen, and the Stoic philosophy is that alone which he recommends to them; Juvenal exhorts to particular virtues, as they are opposed to those vices against which he declaims; but Horace laughs to shame all follies, and insinuates virtue rather by familiar examples than by the severity of precepts.</p><p>This last consideration seems to incline the balance on the side of Horace, and to give him the preference to Juvenal, not only in profit, but in pleasure. But, after all, I must confess that the delight which Horace gives me is but languishing (be pleased still to understand that I speak of my own taste only); he may ravish other men, but I am too stupid and insensible to be tickled. Where he barely grins himself, and, as Scaliger says, only shows his white teeth, he cannot provoke me to any laughter. His urbanity--that is, his good manners--are to be commended; but his wit is faint, and his salt (if I may dare to say so) almost insipid. Juvenal is of a more vigorous and masculine wit; he gives me as much pleasure as I can bear; he fully satisfies my expectation; he treats his subject home; his spleen is raised, and he raises mine. I have the pleasure of concernment in all he says; he drives his reader along with him, and when he is at the end of his way, I willingly stop with him. If he went another stage, it would be too far; it would make a journey of a progress, and turn delight into fatigue. When he gives over, it is a sign the subject is exhausted, and the wit of man can carry it no farther. If a fault can be justly found in him, it is that he is sometimes too luxuriant, too redundant; says more than he needs, like my friend &quot;the Plain Dealer,&quot; but never more than pleases. Add to this that his thoughts are as just as those of Horace, and much more elevated; his expressions are sonorous and more noble; his verse more numerous; and his words are suitable to his thoughts, sublime and lofty. All these contribute to the pleasure of the reader; and the greater the soul of him who reads, his transports are the greater. Horace is always on the amble, Juvenal on the gallop, but his way is perpetually on carpet-ground. He goes with more impetuosity than Horace, but as securely; and the swiftness adds a more lively agitation to the spirits. The low style of Horace is according to his subject--that is, generally grovelling. I question not but he could have raised it, for the first epistle of the second book, which he writes to Augustus (a most instructive satire concerning poetry), is of so much dignity in the words, and of so much elegancy in the numbers, that the author plainly shows the sermo pedestris in his other satires was rather his choice than his necessity. He was a rival to Lucilius, his predecessor, and was resolved to surpass him in his own manner. Lucilius, as we see by his remaining fragments, minded neither his style, nor his numbers, nor his purity of words, nor his run of verse. Horace therefore copes with him in that humble way of satire, writes under his own force, and carries a dead weight, that he may match his competitor in the race. This, I imagine, was the chief reason why he minded only the clearness of his satire, and the cleanness of expression, without ascending to those heights to which his own vigour might have carried him. But limiting his desires only to the conquest of Lucilius, he had his ends of his rival, who lived before him, but made way for a new conquest over himself by Juvenal his successor. He could not give an equal pleasure to his reader, because he used not equal instruments. The fault was in the tools, and not in the workman. But versification and numbers are the greatest pleasures of poetry. Virgil knew it, and practised both so happily that, for aught I know, his greatest excellency is in his diction. In all other parts of poetry he is faultless, but in this he placed his chief perfection. And give me leave, my lord, since I have here an apt occasion, to say that Virgil could have written sharper satires than either Horace or Juvenal if he would have employed his talent that way. I will produce a verse and half of his, in one of his Eclogues, to justify my opinion, and with commas after every word, to show that he has given almost as many lashes as he has written syllables. It is against a bad poet, whose ill verses he describes</p><p>&quot;Non tu, in triviis indocte, solebas Stridenti, miserum, stipula, disperdere carmen?&quot;</p><p>But to return to my purpose. When there is anything deficient in numbers and sound, the reader is uneasy and unsatisfied; he wants something of his complement, desires somewhat which he finds not: and this being the manifest defect of Horace, it is no wonder that, finding it supplied in Juvenal, we are more delighted with him. And besides this, the sauce of Juvenal is more poignant, to create in us an appetite of reading him. The meat of Horace is more nourishing, but the cookery of Juvenal more exquisite; so that, granting Horace to be the more general philosopher, we cannot deny that Juvenal was the greater poet--I mean, in satire. His thoughts are sharper, his indignation against vice is more vehement, his spirit has more of the commonwealth genius; he treats tyranny, and all the vices attending it, as they deserve, with the utmost rigour; and consequently a noble soul is better pleased with a zealous vindicator of Roman liberty than with a temporising poet, a well- mannered court slave, and a man who is often afraid of laughing in the right place--who is ever decent, because he is naturally servile.</p><p>After all, Horace had the disadvantage of the times in which he lived; they were better for the man, but worse for the satirist. It is generally said that those enormous vices which were practised under the reign of Domitian were unknown in the time of Augustus Caesar; that therefore Juvenal had a larger field than Horace. Little follies were out of doors when oppression was to be scourged instead of avarice; it was no longer time to turn into ridicule the false opinions of philosophers when the Roman liberty was to be asserted. There was more need of a Brutus in Domitian&apos;s days to redeem or mend, than of a Horace, if he had then been living, to laugh at a fly-catcher. This reflection at the same time excuses Horace, but exalts Juvenal. I have ended, before I was aware, the comparison of Horace and Juvenal upon the topics of instruction and delight; and indeed I may safely here conclude that commonplace: for if we make Horace our minister of state in satire, and Juvenal of our private pleasures, I think the latter has no ill bargain of it. Let profit have the pre-eminence of honour in the end of poetry; pleasure, though but the second in degree, is the first in favour. And who would not choose to be loved better rather than to be more esteemed! But I am entered already upon another topic, which concerns the particular merits of these two satirists. However, I will pursue my business where I left it, and carry it farther than that common observation of the several ages in which these authors flourished.</p><p>When Horace writ his satires, the monarchy of his Caesar was in its newness, and the government but just made easy to the conquered people. They could not possibly have forgotten the usurpation of that prince upon their freedom, nor the violent methods which he had used in the compassing of that vast design; they yet remembered his proscriptions, and the slaughter of so many noble Romans their defenders--amongst the rest, that horrible action of his when he forced Livia from the arms of her husband (who was constrained to see her married, as Dion relates the story), and, big with child as she was, conveyed to the bed of his insulting rival. The same Dion Cassius gives us another instance of the crime before mentioned-- that Cornelius Sisenna, being reproached in full senate with the licentious conduct of his wife, returned this answer: that he had married her by the counsel of Augustus (intimating, says my author, that Augustus had obliged him to that marriage, that he might under that covert have the more free access to her). His adulteries were still before their eyes, but they must be patient where they had not power. In other things that emperor was moderate enough; propriety was generally secured, and the people entertained with public shows and donatives, to make them more easily digest their lost liberty. But Augustus, who was conscious to himself of so many crimes which he had committed, thought in the first place to provide for his own reputation by making an edict against lampoons and satires, and the authors of those defamatory writings, which my author Tacitus, from the law-term, calls famosos libellos.</p><p>In the first book of his Annals he gives the following account of it in these words:- Primus Augustus cognitionem de famosis libellis, specie legis ejus, tractavit; commotus Cassii Severi libidine, qua viros faeminasque illustres procacibus scriptis diffamaverat. Thus in English:- &quot;Augustus was the first who, under the colour of that law, took cognisance of lampoons, being provoked to it by the petulancy of Cassius Severus, who had defamed many illustrious persons of both sexes in his writings.&quot; The law to which Tacitus refers was Lex laesae majestatis; commonly called, for the sake of brevity, majestas; or, as we say, high-treason. He means not that this law had not been enacted formerly (for it had been made by the Decemviri, and was inscribed amongst the rest in the Twelve Tables, to prevent the aspersion of the Roman majesty, either of the people themselves, or their religion, or their magistrates; and the infringement of it was capital--that is, the offender was whipped to death with the fasces which were borne before their chief officers of Rome), but Augustus was the first who restored that intermitted law. By the words &quot;under colour of that law&quot; he insinuates that Augustus caused it to be executed on pretence of those libels which were written by Cassius Severus against the nobility, but in truth to save himself from such defamatory verses. Suetonius likewise makes mention of it thus:- Sparsos de se in curia famosos libellos, nec exparit, et magna cura redarguit. Ac ne requisitis quidem auctoribus, id modo censuit, cognoscendum posthac de iis qui libellos aut carmina ad infamiam cujuspiam sub alieno nomine edant. &quot;Augustus was not afraid of libels,&quot; says that author, &quot;yet he took all care imaginable to have them answered, and then decreed that for the time to come the authors of them should be punished.&quot; But Aurelius makes it yet more clear, according to my sense, that this emperor for his own sake durst not permit them:- Fecit id Augustus in speciem, et quasi gratificaretur populo Romano, et primoribus urbis; sed revera ut sibi consuleret: nam habuit in animo comprimere nimiam quorundam procacitatem in loquendo, a qua nec ipse exemptus fuit. Nam suo nomine compescere erat invidiosum, sub alieno facile et utile. Ergo specie legis tractavit, quasi populi Romani majestas infamaretur. This, I think, is a sufficient comment on that passage of Tacitus. I will add only by the way that the whole family of the Caesars and all their relations were included in the law, because the majesty of the Romans in the time of the Empire was wholly in that house: Omnia Caesar erat; they were all accounted sacred who belonged to him. As for Cassius Severus, he was contemporary with Horace, and was the same poet against whom he writes in his epodes under this title, In Cassium Severum, maledicum poctam--perhaps intending to kill two crows, according to our proverb, with one stone, and revenge both himself and his emperor together.</p><p>From hence I may reasonably conclude that Augustus, who was not altogether so good as he was wise, had some by-respect in the enacting of this law; for to do anything for nothing was not his maxim. Horace, as he was a courtier, complied with the interest of his master; and, avoiding the lashing of greater crimes, confined himself to the ridiculing of petty vices and common follies, excepting only some reserved cases in his odes and epodes of his own particular quarrels (which either with permission of the magistrate or without it, every man will revenge, though I say not that he should; for prior laesit is a good excuse in the civil law if Christianity had not taught us to forgive). However, he was not the proper man to arraign great vices; at least, if the stories which we hear of him are true--that he practised some which I will not here mention, out of honour to him. It was not for a Clodius to accuse adulterers, especially when Augustus was of that number. So that, though his age was not exempted from the worst of villainies, there was no freedom left to reprehend them by reason of the edict; and our poet was not fit to represent them in an odious character, because himself was dipped in the same actions. Upon this account, without further insisting on the different tempers of Juvenal and Horace, I conclude that the subjects which Horace chose for satire are of a lower nature than those of which Juvenal has written.</p><p>Thus I have treated, in a new method, the comparison betwixt Horace, Juvenal, and Persius. Somewhat of their particular manner, belonging to all of them, is yet remaining to be considered. Persius was grave, and particularly opposed his gravity to lewdness, which was the predominant vice in Nero&apos;s court at the time when he published his satires, which was before that emperor fell into the excess of cruelty. Horace was a mild admonisher, a court satirist, fit for the gentle times of Augustus, and more fit for the reasons which I have already given. Juvenal was as proper for his times as they for theirs; his was an age that deserved a more severe chastisement; vices were more gross and open, more flagitious, more encouraged by the example of a tyrant, and more protected by his authority. Therefore, wheresoever Juvenal mentions Nero, he means Domitian, whom he dares not attack in his own person, but scourges him by proxy. Heinsius urges in praise of Horace that, according to the ancient art and law of satire, it should be nearer to comedy than to tragedy; not declaiming against vice, but only laughing at it. Neither Persius nor Juvenal was ignorant of this, for they had both studied Horace. And the thing itself is plainly true. But as they had read Horace, they had likewise read Lucilius, of whom Persius says, Secuit urbem; . . . et genuinum fregit in illis; meaning Mutius and Lupus; and Juvenal also mentions him in these words</p><p>&quot;Ense velut stricto, quoties Lucilius ardens Infremuit, rubet auditor, cui frigida mens est Criminibus, tacita sulant praecordia culpa.&quot;</p><p>So that they thought the imitation of Lucilius was more proper to their purpose than that of Horace. &quot;They changed satire,&quot; says Holyday, &quot;but they changed it for the better; for the business being to reform great vices, chastisement goes farther than admonition; whereas a perpetual grin, like that of Horace, does rather anger than amend a man.&quot;</p><p>Thus far that learned critic Barten Holyday, whose interpretation and illustrations of Juvenal are as excellent as the verse of his translation and his English are lame and pitiful; for it is not enough to give us the meaning of a poet (which I acknowledge him to have performed most faithfully) but he must also imitate his genius and his numbers as far as the English will come up to the elegance of the original. In few words, it is only for a poet to translate a poet. Holyday and Stapleton had not enough considered this when they attempted Juvenal; but I forbear reflections: only I beg leave to take notice of this sentence, where Holyday says, &quot;a perpetual grin, like that of Horace, rather angers than amends a man.&quot; I cannot give him up the manner of Horace in low satire so easily. Let the chastisements of Juvenal be never so necessary for his new kind of satire, let him declaim as wittily and sharply as he pleases, yet still the nicest and most delicate touches of satire consist in fine raillery. This, my lord, is your particular talent, to which even Juvenal could not arrive. It is not reading, it is not imitation of, an author which can produce this fineness; it must be inborn; it must proceed from a genius, and particular way of thinking, which is not to be taught, and therefore not to be imitated by him who has it not from nature. How easy it is to call rogue and villain, and that wittily! but how hard to make a man appear a fool, a blockhead, or a knave, without using any of those opprobrious terms! To spare the grossness of the names, and to do the thing yet more severely, is to draw a full face and to make the nose and cheeks stand out, and yet not to employ any depth of shadowing. This is the mystery of that noble trade, which yet no master can teach to his apprentice; he may give the rules, but the scholar is never the nearer in his practice. Neither is it true that this fineness of raillery is offensive; a witty man is tickled, while he is hurt in this manner; and a fool feels it not. The occasion of an offence may possibly be given, but he cannot take it. If it be granted that in effect this way does more mischief; that a man is secretly wounded, and though he be not sensible himself, yet the malicious world will find it for him; yet there is still a vast difference betwixt the slovenly butchering of a man, and the fineness of a stroke that separates the head from the body and leaves it standing in its place. A man may be capable, as Jack Ketch&apos;s wife said of his servant, of a plain piece of work, a bare hanging; but to make a malefactor die sweetly was only belonging to her husband. I wish I could apply it to myself, if the reader would be kind enough to think it belongs to me. The character of Zimri, in my &quot;Absalom&quot; is, in my opinion, worth the whole poem; it is not bloody, but it is ridiculous enough; and he for whom it was intended was too witty to resent it as an injury. If I had railed, I might have suffered for it justly; but I managed my own work more happily, perhaps more dexterously. I avoided the mention of great crimes, and applied myself to the representing of blind-sides and little extravagances; to which the wittier a man is, he is generally the more obnoxious. It succeeded as I wished; the jest went round, and he was laughed at in his turn who began the frolic.</p><p>And thus, my lord, you see I have preferred the manner of Horace and of your lordship in this kind of satire to that of Juvenal, and, I think, reasonably. Holyday ought not to have arraigned so great an author for that which was his excellency and his merit; or, if he did, on such a palpable mistake he might expect that some one might possibly arise (either in his own time, or after him) to rectify his error, and restore to Horace that commendation of which he has so unjustly robbed him. And let the manes of Juvenal forgive me if I say that this way of Horace was the best for amending manners, as it is the most difficult. His was an ense rescindendum; but that of Horace was a pleasant cure, with all the limbs preserved entire, and, as our mountebanks tell us in their bills, without keeping the patient within doors for a day. What they promise only, Horace has effectually performed. Yet I contradict not the proposition which I formerly advanced. Juvenal&apos;s times required a more painful kind of operation; but if he had lived in the age of Horace, I must needs affirm that he had it not about him. He took the method which was prescribed him by his own genius, which was sharp and eager; he could not railly, but he could declaim: and as his provocations were great, he has revenged them tragically. This, notwithstanding I am to say another word which, as true as it is, will yet displease the partial admirers of our Horace; I have hinted it before, but it is time for me now to speak more plainly.</p><p>This manner of Horace is indeed the best; but Horace has not executed it altogether so happily--at least, not often. The manner of Juvenal is confessed to be inferior to the former; but Juvenal has excelled him in his performance. Juvenal has railed more wittily than Horace has rallied. Horace means to make his reader laugh, but he is not sure of his experiment. Juvenal always intends to move your indignation, and he always brings about his purpose. Horace, for aught I know, might have tickled the people of his age, but amongst the moderns he is not so successful. They who say he entertains so pleasantly, may perhaps value themselves on the quickness of their own understandings, that they can see a jest farther off than other men; they may find occasion of laughter in the wit-battle of the two buffoons Sarmentus and Cicerrus, and hold their sides for fear of bursting when Rupilius and Persius are scolding. For my own part, I can only like the characters of all four, which are judiciously given; but for my heart I cannot so much as smile at their insipid raillery. I see not why Persius should call upon Brutus to revenge him on his adversary; and that because he had killed Julius Caesar for endeavouring to be a king, therefore he should be desired to murder Rupilius, only because his name was Mr. King. A miserable clench, in my opinion, for Horace to record; I have heard honest Mr. Swan make many a better, and yet have had the grace to hold my countenance. But it may be puns were then in fashion, as they were wit in the sermons of the last age, and in the court of King Charles the Second. I am sorry to say it, for the sake of Horace; but certain it is, he has no fine palate who can feed so heartily on garbage.</p><p>But I have already wearied myself, and doubt not but I have tired your lordship&apos;s patience, with this long, rambling, and, I fear, trivial discourse. Upon the one-half of the merits, that is, pleasure, I cannot but conclude that Juvenal was the better satirist. They who will descend into his particular praises may find them at large in the dissertation of the learned Rigaltius to Thuanus. As for Persius, I have given the reasons why I think him inferior to both of them; yet I have one thing to add on that subject.</p><p>Barten Holyday, who translated both Juvenal and Persius, has made this distinction betwixt them, which is no less true than witty-- that in Persius, the difficulty is to find a meaning; in Juvenal, to choose a meaning; so crabbed is Persius, and so copious is Juvenal; so much the understanding is employed in one, and so much the judgment in the other; so difficult is it to find any sense in the former, and the best sense of the latter.</p><p>If, on the other side, any one suppose I have commended Horace below his merit, when I have allowed him but the second place, I desire him to consider if Juvenal (a man of excellent natural endowments, besides the advantages of diligence and study, and coming after him and building upon his foundations) might not probably, with all these helps, surpass him; and whether it be any dishonour to Horace to be thus surpassed, since no art or science is at once begun and perfected but that it must pass first through many hands and even through several ages. If Lucilius could add to Ennius and Horace to Lucilius, why, without any diminution to the fame of Horace, might not Juvenal give the last perfection to that work? Or rather, what disreputation is it to Horace that Juvenal excels in the tragical satire, as Horace does in the comical? I have read over attentively both Heinsius and Dacier in their commendations of Horace, but I can find no more in either of them for the preference of him to Juvenal than the instructive part (the part of wisdom, and not that of pleasure), which therefore is here allowed him, notwithstanding what Scaliger and Rigaltius have pleaded to the contrary for Juvenal. And to show I am impartial I will here translate what Dacier has said on that subject:-</p><p>&quot;I cannot give a more just idea of the two books of satires made by Horace than by comparing them to the statues of the Sileni, to which Alcibiades compares Socrates in the Symposium. They were figures which had nothing of agreeable, nothing of beauty on their outside; but when any one took the pains to open them and search into them, he there found the figures of all the deities. So in the shape that Horace presents himself to us in his satires we see nothing at the first view which deserves our attention; it seems that he is rather an amusement for children than for the serious consideration of men. But when we take away his crust, and that which hides him from our sight, when we discover him to the bottom, then we find all the divinities in a full assembly--that is to say, all the virtues which ought to be the continual exercise of those who seriously endeavour to correct their vices.&quot;</p><p>It is easy to observe that Dacier, in this noble similitude, has confined the praise of his author wholly to the instructive part the commendation turns on this, and so does that which follows:-</p><p>&quot;In these two books of satire it is the business of Horace to instruct us how to combat our vices, to regulate our passions, to follow nature, to give bounds to our desires, to distinguish betwixt truth and falsehood, and betwixt our conceptions of things and things themselves; to come back from our prejudicate opinions, to understand exactly the principles and motives of all our actions; and to avoid the ridicule into which all men necessarily fall who are intoxicated with those notions which they have received from their masters, and which they obstinately retain without examining whether or no they be founded on right reason.</p><p>&quot;In a word, he labours to render us happy in relation to ourselves; agreeable and faithful to our friends; and discreet, serviceable, and well-bred in relation to those with whom we are obliged to live and to converse. To make his figures intelligible, to conduct his readers through the labyrinth of some perplexed sentence or obscure parenthesis, is no great matter; and, as Epictetus says, there is nothing of beauty in all this, or what is worthy of a prudent man. The principal business, and which is of most importance to us, is to show the use, the reason, and the proof of his precepts.</p><p>&quot;They who endeavour not to correct themselves according to so exact a model are just like the patients who have open before them a book of admirable receipts for their diseases, and please themselves with reading it without comprehending the nature of the remedies or how to apply them to their cure.&quot;</p><p>Let Horace go off with these encomiums, which he has so well deserved.</p><p>To conclude the contention betwixt our three poets I will use the words of Virgil in his fifth AEneid, where AEneas proposes the rewards of the foot-race to the three first who should reach the goal:-</p><p>&quot;Tres praemia primi . . . Accipient, flauaque caput nectentur oliva.&quot;</p><p>Let these three ancients be preferred to all the moderns as first arriving at the goal; let them all be crowned as victors with the wreath that properly belongs to satire. But after that, with this distinction amongst themselves:-</p><p>&quot;Primus equum phaleris insignem victor habeto.&quot;</p><p>Let Juvenal ride first in triumph.</p><p>&quot;Alter Amazoniam pharetram, plenamque sagittis Threiciis, lato quam circumplectitur auro Balteus, et tereti subnectit fibula gemma.&quot;</p><p>Let Horace, who is the second (and but just the second), carry off the quiver and the arrows as the badges of his satire, and the golden belt and the diamond button.</p><p>&quot;Tertius Argolico hoc clypeo contentus abito.&quot;</p><p>And let Persius, the last of the first three worthies, be contented with this Grecian shield, and with victory--not only over all the Grecians, who were ignorant of the Roman satire--but over all the moderns in succeeding ages, excepting Boileau and your lordship.</p><p>And thus I have given the history of satire, and derived it as far as from Ennius to your lordship--that is, from its first rudiments of barbarity to its last polishing and perfection; which is, with Virgil, in his address to Augustus -</p><p>&quot;Nomen fama tot ferre per annos, . . . Tithoni prima quot abest ab origine Caesar.&quot;</p><p>I said only from Ennius, but I may safely carry it higher, as far as Livius Andronicus, who, as I have said formerly, taught the first play at Rome in the year ab urbe condita CCCCCXIV. I have since desired my learned friend Mr. Maidwell to compute the difference of times betwixt Aristophanes and Livius Andronicus; and he assures me from the best chronologers that Plutus, the last of Aristophanes&apos; plays, was represented at Athens in the year of the 97th Olympiad, which agrees with the year urbis conditae CCCLXIV. So that the difference of years betwixt Aristophanes and Andronicus is 150; from whence I have probably deduced that Livius Andronicus, who was a Grecian, had read the plays of the old comedy, which were satirical, and also of the new; for Menander was fifty years before him, which must needs be a great light to him in his own plays that were of the satirical nature. That the Romans had farces before this, it is true; but then they had no communication with Greece; so that Andronicus was the first who wrote after the manner of the old comedy, in his plays: he was imitated by Ennius about thirty years afterwards. Though the former writ fables, the latter, speaking properly, began the Roman satire, according to that description which Juvenal gives of it in his first:-</p><p>&quot;Quicquid agunt homines, votum, timor, ira voluptas, Gaudia, discurses, nostri est farrago libelli.&quot;</p><p>This is that in which I have made hold to differ from Casaubon, Rigaltius, Dacier, and indeed from all the modern critics--that not Ennius, but Andronicus, was the first who, by the archaea comedia of the Greeks, added many beauties to the first rude and barbarous Roman satire; which sort of poem, though we had not derived from Rome, yet nature teaches it mankind in all ages and in every country.</p><p>It is but necessary that, after so much has been said of satire, some definition of it should be given. Heinsius, in his Dissertations on Horace, makes it for me in these words:- &quot;Satire is a kind of poetry, without a series of action, invented for the purging of our minds; in which human vices, ignorance, and errors, and all things besides which are produced from them in every man, are severely reprehended--partly dramatically, partly simply, and sometimes in both kinds of speaking, but for the most part figuratively and occultly; consisting, in a low familiar way, chiefly in a sharp and pungent manner of speech, but partly also in a facetious and civil way of jesting, by which either hatred or laughter or indignation is moved.&quot; Where I cannot but observe that this obscure and perplexed definition, or rather description of satire, is wholly accommodated to the Horatian way, and excluding the works of Juvenal and Persius as foreign from that kind of poem. The clause in the beginning of it, &quot;without a series of action,&quot; distinguishes satire properly from stage-plays, which are all of one action and one continued series of action. The end or scope of satire is to purge the passions; so far it is common to the satires of Juvenal and Persius. The rest which follows is also generally belonging to all three, till he comes upon us with the excluding clause, &quot;consisting, in a low familiar way of speech&quot; which is the proper character of Horace, and from which the other two (for their honour be it spoken) are far distant. But how come lowness of style and the familiarity of words to be so much the propriety of satire that without them a poet can be no more a satirist than without risibility he can be a man? Is the fault of Horace to be made the virtue and standing rule of this poem? Is the grande sophos of Persius, and the sublimity of Juvenal, to be circumscribed with the meanness of words and vulgarity of expression? If Horace refused the pains of numbers and the loftiness of figures are they bound to follow so ill a precedent? Let him walk afoot with his pad in his hand for his own pleasure, but let not them be accounted no poets who choose to mount and show their horsemanship. Holyday is not afraid to say that there was never such a fall as from his odes to his satires, and that he, injuriously to himself, untuned his harp. The majestic way of Persius and Juvenal was new when they began it, but it is old to us; and what poems have not, with time, received an alteration in their fashion?--&quot;which alteration,&quot; says Holyday, &quot;is to after-times as good a warrant as the first.&quot; Has not Virgil changed the manners of Homer&apos;s heroes in his AEneis? Certainly he has, and for the better; for Virgil&apos;s age was more civilised and better bred, and he writ according to the politeness of Rome under the reign of Augustus Caesar, not to the rudeness of Agamemnon&apos;s age or the times of Homer. Why should we offer to confine free spirits to one form when we cannot so much as confine our bodies to one fashion of apparel? Would not Donne&apos;s satires, which abound with so much wit, appear more charming if he had taken care of his words and of his numbers? But he followed Horace so very close that of necessity he must fall with him; and I may safely say it of this present age, that if we are not so great wits as Donne, yet certainly we are better poets.</p><p>But I have said enough, and it may be too much, on this subject. Will your lordship be pleased to prolong my audience only so far till I tell you my own trivial thoughts how a modern satire should be made? I will not deviate in the least from the precepts and examples of the ancients, who were always our best masters; I will only illustrate them, and discover some of the hidden beauties in their designs, that we thereby may form our own in imitation of them. Will you please but to observe that Persius, the least in dignity of all the three, has, notwithstanding, been the first who has discovered to us this important secret in the designing of a perfect satire--that it ought only to treat of one subject; to be confined to one particular theme, or, at least, to one principally? If other vices occur in the management of the chief, they should only be transiently lashed, and not be insisted on, so as to make the design double. As in a play of the English fashion which we call a tragicomedy, there is to be but one main design, and though there be an under-plot or second walk of comical characters and adventures, yet they are subservient to the chief fable, carried along under it and helping to it, so that the drama may not seem a monster with two heads. Thus the Copernican system of the planets makes the moon to be moved by the motion of the earth, and carried about her orb as a dependent of hers. Mascardi, in his discourse of the &quot;Doppia Favola,&quot; or double tale in plays, gives an instance of it in the famous pastoral of Guarini, called Il Pastor Fido, where Corisca and the Satyr are the under-parts; yet we may observe that Corisca is brought into the body of the plot and made subservient to it. It is certain that the divine wit of Horace was not ignorant of this rule--that a play, though it consists of many parts, must yet be one in the action, and must drive on the accomplishment of one design--for he gives this very precept, Sit quod vis simplex duntaxat, et unum; yet he seems not much to mind it in his satires, many of them consisting of more arguments than one, and the second without dependence on the first. Casaubon has observed this before me in his preference of Persius to Horace, and will have his own beloved author to be the first who found out and introduced this method of confining himself to one subject.</p><p>I know it may be urged in defence of Horace that this unity is not necessary, because the very word satura signifies a dish plentifully stored with all variety of fruits and grains. Yet Juvenal, who calls his poems a farrago (which is a word of the same signification with satura), has chosen to follow the same method of Persius and not of Horace; and Boileau, whose example alone is a sufficient authority, has wholly confined himself in all his satires to this unity of design. That variety which is not to be found in any one satire is at least in many, written on several occasions; and if variety be of absolute necessity in every one of them, according to the etymology of the word, yet it may arise naturally from one subject, as it is diversely treated in the several subordinate branches of it, all relating to the chief. It may be illustrated accordingly with variety of examples in the subdivisions of it, and with as many precepts as there are members of it, which all together may complete that olla or hotch-potch which is properly a satire.</p><p>Under this unity of theme or subject is comprehended another rule for perfecting the design of true satire. The poet is bound, and that ex officio, to give his reader some one precept of moral virtue, and to caution him against some one particular vice or folly. Other virtues, subordinate to the first, may be recommended under that chief head, and other vices or follies may be scourged, besides that which he principally intends; but he is chiefly to inculcate one virtue, and insist on that. Thus Juvenal, in every satire excepting the first, ties himself to one principal instructive point, or to the shunning of moral evil. Even in the sixth, which seems only an arraignment of the whole sex of womankind, there is a latent admonition to avoid ill women, by showing how very few who are virtuous and good are to be found amongst them. But this, though the wittiest of all his satires, has yet the least of truth or instruction in it; he has run himself into his old declamatory way, and almost forgotten that he was now setting up for a moral poet.</p><p>Persius is never wanting to us in some profitable doctrine, and in exposing the opposite vices to it. His kind of philosophy is one, which is the Stoic, and every satire is a comment on one particular dogma of that sect, unless we will except the first, which is against bad writers; and yet even there he forgets not the precepts of the &quot;porch.&quot; In general, all virtues are everywhere to be praised and recommended to practice, and all vices to be reprehended and made either odious or ridiculous, or else there is a fundamental error in the whole design.</p><p>I have already declared who are the only persons that are the adequate object of private satire, and who they are that may properly be exposed by name for public examples of vices and follies, and therefore I will trouble your lordship no further with them. Of the best and finest manner of satire, I have said enough in the comparison betwixt Juvenal and Horace; it is that sharp well- mannered way of laughing a folly out of countenance, of which your lordship is the best master in this age. I will proceed to the versification which is most proper for it, and add somewhat to what I have said already on that subject. The sort of verse which is called &quot;burlesque,&quot; consisting of eight syllables or four feet, is that which our excellent Hudibras has chosen. I ought to have mentioned him before when I spoke of Donne, but by a slip of an old man&apos;s memory he was forgotten. The worth of his poem is too well known to need my commendation, and he is above my censure. His satire is of the Varronian kind, though unmixed with prose. The choice of his numbers is suitable enough to his design as he has managed it; but in any other hand the shortness of his verse, and the quick returns of rhyme, had debased the dignity of style. And besides, the double rhyme (a necessary companion of burlesque writing) is not so proper for manly satire, for it turns earnest too much to jest, and gives us a boyish kind of pleasure. It tickles awkwardly, with a kind of pain to the best sort of readers; we are pleased ungratefully, and, if I may say so, against our liking. We thank him not for giving us that unseasonable delight, when we know he could have given us a better and more solid. He might have left that task to others who, not being able to put in thought, can only makes us grin with the excrescence of a word of two or three syllables in the close. It is, indeed, below so great a master to make use of such a little instrument. But his good sense is perpetually shining through all he writes; it affords us not the time of finding faults: we pass through the levity of his rhyme, and are immediately carried into some admirable useful thought. After all, he has chosen this kind of verse, and has written the best in it, and had he taken another he would always have excelled; as we say of a court favourite, that whatsoever his office be, he still makes it uppermost and most beneficial to himself.</p><p>The quickness of your imagination, my lord, has already prevented me; and you know beforehand that I would prefer the verse of ten syllables, which we call the English heroic, to that of eight. This is truly my opinion, for this sort of number is more roomy; the thought can turn itself with greater ease in a larger compass. When the rhyme comes too thick upon us, it straitens the expression; we are thinking of the close when we should be employed in adorning the thought. It makes a poet giddy with turning in a space too narrow for his imagination; he loses many beauties without gaining one advantage. For a burlesque rhyme I have already concluded to be none; or, if it were, it is more easily purchased in ten syllables than in eight. In both occasions it is as in a tennis-court, when the strokes of greater force are given, when we strike out and play at length. Tassoni and Boileau have left us the best examples of this way in the &quot;Seechia Rapita&quot; and the &quot;Lutrin,&quot; and next them Merlin Cocaius in his &quot;Baldus.&quot; I will speak only of the two former, because the last is written in Latin verse. The &quot;Secchia Rapita&quot; is an Italian poem, a satire of the Varronian kind. It is written in the stanza of eight, which is their measure for heroic verse. The words are stately, the numbers smooth; the turn both of thoughts and words is happy. The first six lines of the stanza seem majestical and severe, but the two last turn them all into a pleasant ridicule. Boileau, if I am not much deceived, has modelled from hence his famous &quot;Lutrin.&quot; He had read the burlesque poetry of Scarron with some kind of indignation, as witty as it was, and found nothing in France that was worthy of his imitation; but he copied the Italian so well that his own may pass for an original. He writes it in the French heroic verse, and calls it an heroic poem; his subject is trivial, but his verse is noble. I doubt not but he had Virgil in his eye, for we find many admirable imitations of him, and some parodies, as particularly this passage in the fourth of the AEneids -</p><p>&quot;Nec tibi diva parens, generis nec Dardanus auctor, Perfide; sed duris genuit te cautibus horrens Caucasus, Hyrrcanaeque admorunt ubera tigres:&quot;</p><p>which he thus translates, keeping to the words, but altering the sense:-</p><p>&quot;Non, ton pere a Paris, ne fut point boulanger: Et tu n&apos;es point du sang de Gervais, l&apos;horloger; Ta mere ne fut point la maitresse d&apos;un coche; Caucase dans ses flancs te forma d&apos;une roche; Une tigresse affreuse, en quelque antre ecarte, Te fit, avec son lait, succer sa cruaute.&quot;</p><p>And as Virgil in his fourth Georgic of the bees, perpetually raises the lowness of his subject by the loftiness of his words, and ennobles it by comparisons drawn from empires and from monarchs -</p><p>&quot;Admiranda tibi levium spectacula rerum, Magnanimosque duces, totiusque ordine gentis Mores et studia, et populos, et praelia dicam;&quot;</p><p>and again -</p><p>&quot;At genus immortale manet, multosque per annos Stat fortuna domus, et avi numerantur avorum;&quot;</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
            <enclosure url="https://storage.googleapis.com/papyrus_images/42e93e15065a7aa6acacc1033787616d95f509d82b16368c0941c4e09ea3106f.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[We  arrived  at  Lincoln's  Inn  Fields  without  any  new  adventures,   except encountering an unlucky donkey ]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/we-arrived-at-lincoln-s-inn-fields-without-any-new-adventures-except-encountering-an-unlucky-donkey</link>
            <guid>NlSxmJF5gFBUvtimuvLv</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:19:20 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[who suggested painful associations to my aunt. We had another long talk about my plans, when we were safely housed; and as I knew she was anxious to get home, and, between fire, food, and pickpockets, could never be considered at her ease for half-an-hour in London, I urged her not to be uncomfortable on my account, but to leave me to take care of myself. &apos;I have not been here a week tomorrow, without considering that too, my dear,&apos; she returned. &apos;There is a furnished little se...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who suggested painful associations to my aunt. We had another long talk about my plans, when we were safely housed; and as I knew she was anxious to get home, and, between fire, food, and pickpockets, could never be considered at her ease for half-an-hour in London, I urged her not to be uncomfortable on my account, but to leave me to take care of myself.</p><p>&apos;I have not been here a week tomorrow, without considering that too, my dear,&apos; she returned. &apos;There is a furnished little set of chambers to be let in the Adelphi, Trot, which ought to suit you to a marvel.&apos;</p><p>With this brief introduction, she produced from her pocket an advertisement, carefully cut out of a newspaper, setting forth that in Buckingham Street in the Adelphi there was to be let furnished, with a view of the river, a singularly desirable, and compact set of chambers, forming a genteel residence for a young gentleman, a member of one of the Inns of Court, or otherwise, with immediate possession. Terms moderate, and could be taken for a month only, if required.</p><p>&apos;Why, this is the very thing, aunt!&apos; said I, flushed with the possible dignity of living in chambers.</p><p>&apos;Then come,&apos; replied my aunt, immediately resuming the bonnet she had a minute before laid aside. &apos;We&apos;ll go and look at &apos;em.&apos;</p><p>Away we went. The advertisement directed us to apply to Mrs. Crupp on the premises, and we rung the area bell, which we supposed to communicate with Mrs. Crupp. It was not until we had rung three or four times that we could prevail on Mrs. Crupp to communicate with us, but at last she appeared, being a stout lady with a flounce of flannel petticoat below a nankeen gown.</p><p>&apos;Let us see these chambers of yours, if you please, ma&apos;am,&apos; said my aunt.</p><p>&apos;For this gentleman?&apos; said Mrs. Crupp, feeling in her pocket for her keys.</p><p>&apos;Yes, for my nephew,&apos; said my aunt.</p><p>&apos;And a sweet set they is for sich!&apos; said Mrs. Crupp.</p><p>So we went upstairs.</p><p>They were on the top of the house - a great point with my aunt, being near the fire-escape - and consisted of a little half-blind entry where you could see hardly anything, a little stone-blind pantry where you could see nothing at all, a sitting-room, and a bedroom. The furniture was rather faded, but quite good enough for me; and, sure enough, the river was outside the windows.</p><p>As I was delighted with the place, my aunt and Mrs. Crupp withdrew into the pantry to discuss the terms, while I remained on the sitting-room sofa, hardly daring to think it possible that I could be destined to live in such a noble residence. After a single combat of some duration they returned, and I saw, to my joy, both in Mrs. Crupp&apos;s countenance and in my aunt&apos;s, that the deed was done.</p><p>&apos;Is it the last occupant&apos;s furniture?&apos; inquired my aunt.</p><p>&apos;Yes, it is, ma&apos;am,&apos; said Mrs. Crupp.</p><p>&apos;What&apos;s become of him?&apos; asked my aunt.</p><p>Mrs. Crupp was taken with a troublesome cough, in the midst of which she articulated with much difficulty. &apos;He was took ill here, ma&apos;am, and - ugh! ugh! ugh! dear me! - and he died!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Hey! What did he die of?&apos; asked my aunt.</p><p>&apos;Well, ma&apos;am, he died of drink,&apos; said Mrs. Crupp, in confidence. &apos;And smoke.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Smoke? You don&apos;t mean chimneys?&apos; said my aunt.</p><p>&apos;No, ma&apos;am,&apos; returned Mrs. Crupp. &apos;Cigars and pipes.&apos;</p><p>&apos;That&apos;s not catching, Trot, at any rate,&apos; remarked my aunt, turning to me.</p><p>&apos;No, indeed,&apos; said I.</p><p>In short, my aunt, seeing how enraptured I was with the premises, took them for a month, with leave to remain for twelve months when that time was out. Mrs. Crupp was to find linen, and to cook; every other necessary was already provided; and Mrs. Crupp expressly intimated that she should always yearn towards me as a son. I was to take possession the day after tomorrow, and Mrs. Crupp said, thank Heaven she had now found summun she could care for!</p><p>On our way back, my aunt informed me how she confidently trusted that the life I was now to lead would make me firm and self-reliant, which was all I wanted. She repeated this several times next day, in the intervals of our arranging for the transmission of my clothes and books from Mr. Wickfield&apos;s; relative to which, and to all my late holiday, I wrote a long letter to Agnes, of which my aunt took charge, as she was to leave on the succeeding day. Not to lengthen these particulars, I need only add, that she made a handsome provision for all my possible wants during my month of trial; that Steerforth, to my great disappointment and hers too, did not make his appearance before she went away; that I saw her safely seated in the Dover coach, exulting in the coming discomfiture of the vagrant donkeys, with Janet at her side; and that when the coach was gone, I turned my face to the Adelphi, pondering on the old days when I used to roam about its subterranean arches, and on the happy changes which had brought me to the surface.</p><p>CHAPTER 24 MY FIRST DISSIPATION</p><p>It was a wonderfully fine thing to have that lofty castle to myself, and to feel, when I shut my outer door, like Robinson Crusoe, when he had got into his fortification, and pulled his ladder up after him. It was a wonderfully fine thing to walk about town with the key of my house in my pocket, and to know that I could ask any fellow to come home, and make quite sure of its being inconvenient to nobody, if it were not so to me. It was a wonderfully fine thing to let myself in and out, and to come and go without a word to anyone, and to ring Mrs. Crupp up, gasping, from the depths of the earth, when I wanted her - and when she was disposed to come. All this, I say, was wonderfully fine; but I must say, too, that there were times when it was very dreary.</p><p>It was fine in the morning, particularly in the fine mornings. It looked a very fresh, free life, by daylight: still fresher, and more free, by sunlight. But as the day declined, the life seemed to go down too. I don&apos;t know how it was; it seldom looked well by candle-light. I wanted somebody to talk to, then. I missed Agnes. I found a tremendous blank, in the place of that smiling repository of my confidence. Mrs. Crupp appeared to be a long way off. I thought about my predecessor, who had died of drink and smoke; and I could have wished he had been so good as to live, and not bother me with his decease.</p><p>After two days and nights, I felt as if I had lived there for a year, and yet I was not an hour older, but was quite as much tormented by my own youthfulness as ever.</p><p>Steerforth not yet appearing, which induced me to apprehend that he must be ill, I left the Commons early on the third day, and walked out to Highgate. Mrs. Steerforth was very glad to see me, and said that he had gone away with one of his Oxford friends to see another who lived near St. Albans, but that she expected him to return tomorrow. I was so fond of him, that I felt quite jealous of his Oxford friends.</p><p>As she pressed me to stay to dinner, I remained, and I believe we talked about nothing but him all day. I told her how much the people liked him at Yarmouth, and what a delightful companion he had been. Miss Dartle was full of hints and mysterious questions, but took a great interest in all our proceedings there, and said, &apos;Was it really though?&apos; and so forth, so often, that she got everything out of me she wanted to know. Her appearance was exactly what I have described it, when I first saw her; but the society of the two ladies was so agreeable, and came so natural to me, that I felt myself falling a little in love with her. I could not help thinking, several times in the course of the evening, and particularly when I walked home at night, what delightful company she would be in Buckingham Street.</p><p>I was taking my coffee and roll in the morning, before going to the Commons and I may observe in this place that it is surprising how much coffee Mrs. Crupp used, and how weak it was, considering - when Steerforth himself walked in, to my unbounded joy.</p><p>&apos;My dear Steerforth,&apos; cried I, &apos;I began to think I should never see you again!&apos;</p><p>&apos;I was carried off, by force of arms,&apos; said Steerforth, &apos;the very next morning after I got home. Why, Daisy, what a rare old bachelor you are here!&apos;</p><p>I showed him over the establishment, not omitting the pantry, with no little pride, and he commended it highly. &apos;I tell you what, old boy,&apos; he added, &apos;I shall make quite a town-house of this place, unless you give me notice to quit.&apos;</p><p>This was a delightful hearing. I told him if he waited for that, he would have to wait till doomsday.</p><p>&apos;But you shall have some breakfast!&apos; said I, with my hand on the bell-rope, &apos;and Mrs. Crupp shall make you some fresh coffee, and I&apos;ll toast you some bacon in a bachelor&apos;s Dutch-oven, that I have got here.&apos;</p><p>&apos;No, no!&apos; said Steerforth. &apos;Don&apos;t ring! I can&apos;t! I am going to breakfast with one of these fellows who is at the Piazza Hotel, in Covent Garden.&apos;</p><p>&apos;But you&apos;ll come back to dinner?&apos; said I.</p><p>&apos;I can&apos;t, upon my life. There&apos;s nothing I should like better, but I must remain with these two fellows. We are all three off together tomorrow morning.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Then bring them here to dinner,&apos; I returned. &apos;Do you think they would come?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Oh! they would come fast enough,&apos; said Steerforth; &apos;but we should inconvenience you. You had better come and dine with us somewhere.&apos;</p><p>I would not by any means consent to this, for it occurred to me that I really ought to have a little house-warming, and that there never could be a better opportunity. I had a new pride in my rooms after his approval of them, and burned with a desire to develop their utmost resources. I therefore made him promise positively in the names of his two friends, and we appointed six o&apos;clock as the dinner-hour.</p><p>When he was gone, I rang for Mrs. Crupp, and acquainted her with my desperate design. Mrs. Crupp said, in the first place, of course it was well known she couldn&apos;t be expected to wait, but she knew a handy young man, who she thought could be prevailed upon to do it, and whose terms would be five shillings, and what I pleased. I said, certainly we would have him. Next Mrs. Crupp said it was clear she couldn&apos;t be in two places at once (which I felt to be reasonable), and that &apos;a young gal&apos; stationed in the pantry with a bedroom candle, there never to desist from washing plates, would be indispensable. I said, what would be the expense of this young female? and Mrs. Crupp said she supposed eighteenpence would neither make me nor break me. I said I supposed not; and THAT was settled. Then Mrs. Crupp said, Now about the dinner.</p><p>It was a remarkable instance of want of forethought on the part of the ironmonger who had made Mrs. Crupp&apos;s kitchen fireplace, that it was capable of cooking nothing but chops and mashed potatoes. As to a fish-kittle, Mrs. Crupp said, well! would I only come and look at the range? She couldn&apos;t say fairer than that. Would I come and look at it? As I should not have been much the wiser if I HAD looked at it, I declined, and said, &apos;Never mind fish.&apos; But Mrs. Crupp said, Don&apos;t say that; oysters was in, why not them? So THAT was settled. Mrs. Crupp then said what she would recommend would be this. A pair of hot roast fowls - from the pastry-cook&apos;s; a dish of stewed beef, with vegetables from the pastry-cook&apos;s; two little corner things, as a raised pie and a dish of kidneys - from the pastrycook&apos;s; a tart, and (if I liked) a shape of jelly from the pastrycook&apos;s. This, Mrs. Crupp said, would leave her at full liberty to concentrate her mind on the potatoes, and to serve up the cheese and celery as she could wish to see it done.</p><p>I acted on Mrs. Crupp&apos;s opinion, and gave the order at the pastry-cook&apos;s myself. Walking along the Strand, afterwards, and observing a hard mottled substance in the window of a ham and beef shop, which resembled marble, but was labelled &apos;Mock Turtle&apos;, I went in and bought a slab of it, which I have since seen reason to believe would have sufficed for fifteen people. This preparation, Mrs. Crupp, after some difficulty, consented to warm up; and it shrunk so much in a liquid state, that we found it what Steerforth called &apos;rather a tight fit&apos; for four.</p><p>These preparations happily completed, I bought a little dessert in Covent Garden Market, and gave a rather extensive order at a retail wine-merchant&apos;s in that vicinity. When I came home in the afternoon, and saw the bottles drawn up in a square on the pantry floor, they looked so numerous (though there were two missing, which made Mrs. Crupp very uncomfortable), that I was absolutely frightened at them.</p><p>One of Steerforth&apos;s friends was named Grainger, and the other Markham. They were both very gay and lively fellows; Grainger, something older than Steerforth; Markham, youthful-looking, and I should say not more than twenty. I observed that the latter always spoke of himself indefinitely, as &apos;a man&apos;, and seldom or never in the first person singular.</p><p>&apos;A man might get on very well here, Mr. Copperfield,&apos; said Markham - meaning himself.</p><p>&apos;It&apos;s not a bad situation,&apos; said I, &apos;and the rooms are really commodious.&apos;</p><p>&apos;I hope you have both brought appetites with you?&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;Upon my honour,&apos; returned Markham, &apos;town seems to sharpen a man&apos;s appetite. A man is hungry all day long. A man is perpetually eating.&apos;</p><p>Being a little embarrassed at first, and feeling much too young to preside, I made Steerforth take the head of the table when dinner was announced, and seated myself opposite to him. Everything was very good; we did not spare the wine; and he exerted himself so brilliantly to make the thing pass off well, that there was no pause in our festivity. I was not quite such good company during dinner as I could have wished to be, for my chair was opposite the door, and my attention was distracted by observing that the handy young man went out of the room very often, and that his shadow always presented itself, immediately afterwards, on the wall of the entry, with a bottle at its mouth. The &apos;young gal&apos; likewise occasioned me some uneasiness: not so much by neglecting to wash the plates, as by breaking them. For being of an inquisitive disposition, and unable to confine herself (as her positive instructions were) to the pantry, she was constantly peering in at us, and constantly imagining herself detected; in which belief, she several times retired upon the plates (with which she had carefully paved the floor), and did a great deal of destruction.</p><p>These, however, were small drawbacks, and easily forgotten when the cloth was cleared, and the dessert put on the table; at which period of the entertainment the handy young man was discovered to be speechless. Giving him private directions to seek the society of Mrs. Crupp, and to remove the &apos;young gal&apos; to the basement also, I abandoned myself to enjoyment.</p><p>I began, by being singularly cheerful and light-hearted; all sorts of half forgotten things to talk about, came rushing into my mind, and made me hold forth in a most unwonted manner. I laughed heartily at my own jokes, and everybody else&apos;s; called Steerforth to order for not passing the wine; made several engagements to go to Oxford; announced that I meant to have a dinner party exactly like that, once a week, until further notice; and madly took so much snuff out of Grainger&apos;s box, that I was obliged to go into the pantry, and have a private fit of sneezing ten minutes long.</p><p>I went on, by passing the wine faster and faster yet, and continually starting up with a corkscrew to open more wine, long before any was needed. I proposed Steerforth&apos;s health. I said he was my dearest friend, the protector of my boyhood, and the companion of my prime. I said I was delighted to propose his health. I said I owed him more obligations than I could ever repay, and held him in a higher admiration than I could ever express. I finished by saying, &apos;I&apos;ll give you Steerforth! God bless him! Hurrah!&apos; We gave him three times three, and another, and a good one to finish with. I broke my glass in going round the table to shake hands with him, and I said (in two words) &apos;Steerforth you&apos;retheguidingstarofmyexistence.&apos;</p><p>I went on, by finding suddenly that somebody was in the middle of a song. Markham was the singer, and he sang &apos;When the heart of a man is depressed with care&apos;. He said, when he had sung it, he would give us &apos;Woman!&apos; I took objection to that, and I couldn&apos;t allow it. I said it was not a respectful way of proposing the toast, and I would never permit that toast to be drunk in my house otherwise than as &apos;The Ladies!&apos; I was very high with him, mainly I think because I saw Steerforth and Grainger laughing at me - or at him - or at both of us. He said a man was not to be dictated to. I said a man was. He said a man was not to be insulted, then. I said he was right there - never under my roof, where the Lares were sacred, and the laws of hospitality paramount. He said it was no derogation from a man&apos;s dignity to confess that I was a devilish good fellow. I instantly proposed his health.</p><p>Somebody was smoking. We were all smoking. I was smoking, and trying to suppress a rising tendency to shudder. Steerforth had made a speech about me, in the course of which I had been affected almost to tears. I returned thanks, and hoped the present company would dine with me tomorrow, and the day after each day at five o&apos;clock, that we might enjoy the pleasures of conversation and society through a long evening. I felt called upon to propose an individual. I would give them my aunt. Miss Betsey Trotwood, the best of her sex!</p><p>Somebody was leaning out of my bedroom window, refreshing his forehead against the cool stone of the parapet, and feeling the air upon his face. It was myself. I was addressing myself as &apos;Copperfield&apos;, and saying, &apos;Why did you try to smoke? You might have known you couldn&apos;t do it.&apos; Now, somebody was unsteadily contemplating his features in the looking-glass. That was I too. I was very pale in the looking-glass; my eyes had a vacant appearance; and my hair - only my hair, nothing else - looked drunk.</p><p>Somebody said to me, &apos;Let us go to the theatre, Copperfield!&apos; There was no bedroom before me, but again the jingling table covered with glasses; the lamp; Grainger on my right hand, Markham on my left, and Steerforth opposite - all sitting in a mist, and a long way off. The theatre? To be sure. The very thing. Come along! But they must excuse me if I saw everybody out first, and turned the lamp off - in case of fire.</p><p>Owing to some confusion in the dark, the door was gone. I was feeling for it in the window-curtains, when Steerforth, laughing, took me by the arm and led me out. We went downstairs, one behind another. Near the bottom, somebody fell, and rolled down. Somebody else said it was Copperfield. I was angry at that false report, until, finding myself on my back in the passage, I began to think there might be some foundation for it.</p><p>A very foggy night, with great rings round the lamps in the streets! There was an indistinct talk of its being wet. I considered it frosty. Steerforth dusted me under a lamp-post, and put my hat into shape, which somebody produced from somewhere in a most extraordinary manner, for I hadn&apos;t had it on before. Steerforth then said, &apos;You are all right, Copperfield, are you not?&apos; and I told him, &apos;Neverberrer.&apos;</p><p>A man, sitting in a pigeon-hole-place, looked out of the fog, and took money from somebody, inquiring if I was one of the gentlemen paid for, and appearing rather doubtful (as I remember in the glimpse I had of him) whether to take the money for me or not. Shortly afterwards, we were very high up in a very hot theatre, looking down into a large pit, that seemed to me to smoke; the people with whom it was crammed were so indistinct. There was a great stage, too, looking very clean and smooth after the streets; and there were people upon it, talking about something or other, but not at all intelligibly. There was an abundance of bright lights, and there was music, and there were ladies down in the boxes, and I don&apos;t know what more. The whole building looked to me as if it were learning to swim; it conducted itself in such an unaccountable manner, when I tried to steady it.</p><p>On somebody&apos;s motion, we resolved to go downstairs to the dress-boxes, where the ladies were. A gentleman lounging, full dressed, on a sofa, with an opera-glass in his hand, passed before my view, and also my own figure at full length in a glass. Then I was being ushered into one of these boxes, and found myself saying something as I sat down, and people about me crying &apos;Silence!&apos; to somebody, and ladies casting indignant glances at me, and - what! yes! - Agnes, sitting on the seat before me, in the same box, with a lady and gentleman beside her, whom I didn&apos;t know. I see her face now, better than I did then, I dare say, with its indelible look of regret and wonder turned upon me.</p><p>&apos;Agnes!&apos; I said, thickly, &apos;Lorblessmer! Agnes!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Hush! Pray!&apos; she answered, I could not conceive why. &apos;You disturb the company. Look at the stage!&apos;</p><p>I tried, on her injunction, to fix it, and to hear something of what was going on there, but quite in vain. I looked at her again by and by, and saw her shrink into her corner, and put her gloved hand to her forehead.</p><p>&apos;Agnes!&apos; I said. &apos;I&apos;mafraidyou&apos;renorwell.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Yes, yes. Do not mind me, Trotwood,&apos; she returned. &apos;Listen! Are you going away soon?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Amigoarawaysoo?&apos; I repeated.</p><p>&apos;Yes.&apos;</p><p>I had a stupid intention of replying that I was going to wait, to hand her downstairs. I suppose I expressed it, somehow; for after she had looked at me attentively for a little while, she appeared to understand, and replied in a low tone:</p><p>&apos;I know you will do as I ask you, if I tell you I am very earnest in it. Go away now, Trotwood, for my sake, and ask your friends to take you home.&apos;</p><p>She had so far improved me, for the time, that though I was angry with her, I felt ashamed, and with a short &apos;Goori!&apos; (which I intended for &apos;Good night!&apos;) got up and went away. They followed, and I stepped at once out of the box-door into my bedroom, where only Steerforth was with me, helping me to undress, and where I was by turns telling him that Agnes was my sister, and adjuring him to bring the corkscrew, that I might open another bottle of wine.</p><p>How somebody, lying in my bed, lay saying and doing all this over again, at cross purposes, in a feverish dream all night - the bed a rocking sea that was never still! How, as that somebody slowly settled down into myself, did I begin to parch, and feel as if my outer covering of skin were a hard board; my tongue the bottom of an empty kettle, furred with long service, and burning up over a slow fire; the palms of my hands, hot plates of metal which no ice could cool!</p><p>But the agony of mind, the remorse, and shame I felt when I became conscious next day! My horror of having committed a thousand offences I had forgotten, and which nothing could ever expiate - my recollection of that indelible look which Agnes had given me - the torturing impossibility of communicating with her, not knowing, Beast that I was, how she came to be in London, or where she stayed - my disgust of the very sight of the room where the revel had been held - my racking head - the smell of smoke, the sight of glasses, the impossibility of going out, or even getting up! Oh, what a day it was!</p><p>Oh, what an evening, when I sat down by my fire to a basin of mutton broth, dimpled all over with fat, and thought I was going the way of my predecessor, and should succeed to his dismal story as well as to his chambers, and had half a mind to rush express to Dover and reveal all! What an evening, when Mrs. Crupp, coming in to take away the broth-basin, produced one kidney on a cheese plate as the entire remains of yesterday&apos;s feast, and I was really inclined to fall upon her nankeen breast and say, in heartfelt penitence, &apos;Oh, Mrs. Crupp, Mrs. Crupp, never mind the broken meats! I am very miserable!&apos; - only that I doubted, even at that pass, if Mrs. Crupp were quite the sort of woman to confide in!</p><p>CHAPTER 25 GOOD AND BAD ANGELS</p><p>I was going out at my door on the morning after that deplorable day of headache, sickness, and repentance, with an odd confusion in my mind relative to the date of my dinner-party, as if a body of Titans had taken an enormous lever and pushed the day before yesterday some months back, when I saw a ticket-porter coming upstairs, with a letter in his hand. He was taking his time about his errand, then; but when he saw me on the top of the staircase, looking at him over the banisters, he swung into a trot, and came up panting as if he had run himself into a state of exhaustion.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Littimer touched his hat in acknowledgement of my good opinion, and I felt about eight years old.  ]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/littimer-touched-his-hat-in-acknowledgement-of-my-good-opinion-and-i-felt-about-eight-years-old</link>
            <guid>CfMRDeODHaBDRdVDNBOn</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:19:05 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[He touched it once more, wishing us a good journey; and we left him standing on the pavement, as respectable a mystery as any pyramid in Egypt. For some little time we held no conversation, Steerforth being unusually silent, and I being sufficiently engaged in wondering, within myself, when I should see the old places again, and what new changes might happen to me or them in the meanwhile. At length Steerforth, becoming gay and talkative in a moment, as he could become anything he liked at an...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He touched it once more, wishing us a good journey; and we left him standing on the pavement, as respectable a mystery as any pyramid in Egypt.</p><p>For some little time we held no conversation, Steerforth being unusually silent, and I being sufficiently engaged in wondering, within myself, when I should see the old places again, and what new changes might happen to me or them in the meanwhile. At length Steerforth, becoming gay and talkative in a moment, as he could become anything he liked at any moment, pulled me by the arm:</p><p>&apos;Find a voice, David. What about that letter you were speaking of at breakfast?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Oh!&apos; said I, taking it out of my pocket. &apos;It&apos;s from my aunt.&apos;</p><p>&apos;And what does she say, requiring consideration?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Why, she reminds me, Steerforth,&apos; said I, &apos;that I came out on this expedition to look about me, and to think a little.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Which, of course, you have done?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Indeed I can&apos;t say I have, particularly. To tell you the truth, I am afraid I have forgotten it.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Well! look about you now, and make up for your negligence,&apos; said Steerforth. &apos;Look to the right, and you&apos;ll see a flat country, with a good deal of marsh in it; look to the left, and you&apos;ll see the same. Look to the front, and you&apos;ll find no difference; look to the rear, and there it is still.&apos; I laughed, and replied that I saw no suitable profession in the whole prospect; which was perhaps to be attributed to its flatness.</p><p>&apos;What says our aunt on the subject?&apos; inquired Steerforth, glancing at the letter in my hand. &apos;Does she suggest anything?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Why, yes,&apos; said I. &apos;She asks me, here, if I think I should like to be a proctor? What do you think of it?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Well, I don&apos;t know,&apos; replied Steerforth, coolly. &apos;You may as well do that as anything else, I suppose?&apos;</p><p>I could not help laughing again, at his balancing all callings and professions so equally; and I told him so.</p><p>&apos;What is a proctor, Steerforth?&apos; said I.</p><p>&apos;Why, he is a sort of monkish attorney,&apos; replied Steerforth. &apos;He is, to some faded courts held in Doctors&apos; Commons, - a lazy old nook near St. Paul&apos;s Churchyard - what solicitors are to the courts of law and equity. He is a functionary whose existence, in the natural course of things, would have terminated about two hundred years ago. I can tell you best what he is, by telling you what Doctors&apos; Commons is. It&apos;s a little out-of-the-way place, where they administer what is called ecclesiastical law, and play all kinds of tricks with obsolete old monsters of acts of Parliament, which three-fourths of the world know nothing about, and the other fourth supposes to have been dug up, in a fossil state, in the days of the Edwards. It&apos;s a place that has an ancient monopoly in suits about people&apos;s wills and people&apos;s marriages, and disputes among ships and boats.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Nonsense, Steerforth!&apos; I exclaimed. &apos;You don&apos;t mean to say that there is any affinity between nautical matters and ecclesiastical matters?&apos;</p><p>&apos;I don&apos;t, indeed, my dear boy,&apos; he returned; &apos;but I mean to say that they are managed and decided by the same set of people, down in that same Doctors&apos; Commons. You shall go there one day, and find them blundering through half the nautical terms in Young&apos;s Dictionary, apropos of the &quot;Nancy&quot; having run down the &quot;Sarah Jane&quot;, or Mr. Peggotty and the Yarmouth boatmen having put off in a gale of wind with an anchor and cable to the &quot;Nelson&quot; Indiaman in distress; and you shall go there another day, and find them deep in the evidence, pro and con, respecting a clergyman who has misbehaved himself; and you shall find the judge in the nautical case, the advocate in the clergyman&apos;s case, or contrariwise. They are like actors: now a man&apos;s a judge, and now he is not a judge; now he&apos;s one thing, now he&apos;s another; now he&apos;s something else, change and change about; but it&apos;s always a very pleasant, profitable little affair of private theatricals, presented to an uncommonly select audience.&apos;</p><p>&apos;But advocates and proctors are not one and the same?&apos; said I, a little puzzled. &apos;Are they?&apos;</p><p>&apos;No,&apos; returned Steerforth, &apos;the advocates are civilians - men who have taken a doctor&apos;s degree at college - which is the first reason of my knowing anything about it. The proctors employ the advocates. Both get very comfortable fees, and altogether they make a mighty snug little party. On the whole, I would recommend you to take to Doctors&apos; Commons kindly, David. They plume them selves on their gentility there, I can tell you, if that&apos;s any satisfaction.&apos;</p><p>I made allowance for Steerforth&apos;s light way of treating the subject, and, considering it with reference to the staid air of gravity and antiquity which I associated with that &apos;lazy old nook near St. Paul&apos;s Churchyard&apos;, did not feel indisposed towards my aunt&apos;s suggestion; which she left to my free decision, making no scruple of telling me that it had occurred to her, on her lately visiting her own proctor in Doctors&apos; Commons for the purpose of settling her will in my favour.</p><p>&apos;That&apos;s a laudable proceeding on the part of our aunt, at all events,&apos; said Steerforth, when I mentioned it; &apos;and one deserving of all encouragement. Daisy, my advice is that you take kindly to Doctors&apos; Commons.&apos;</p><p>I quite made up my mind to do so. I then told Steerforth that my aunt was in town awaiting me (as I found from her letter), and that she had taken lodgings for a week at a kind of private hotel at Lincoln&apos;s Inn Fields, where there was a stone staircase, and a convenient door in the roof; my aunt being firmly persuaded that every house in London was going to be burnt down every night.</p><p>We achieved the rest of our journey pleasantly, sometimes recurring to Doctors&apos; Commons, and anticipating the distant days when I should be a proctor there, which Steerforth pictured in a variety of humorous and whimsical lights, that made us both merry. When we came to our journey&apos;s end, he went home, engaging to call upon me next day but one; and I drove to Lincoln&apos;s Inn Fields, where I found my aunt up, and waiting supper.</p><p>If I had been round the world since we parted, we could hardly have been better pleased to meet again. My aunt cried outright as she embraced me; and said, pretending to laugh, that if my poor mother had been alive, that silly little creature would have shed tears, she had no doubt.</p><p>&apos;So you have left Mr. Dick behind, aunt?&apos; said I. &apos;I am sorry for that. Ah, Janet, how do you do?&apos;</p><p>As Janet curtsied, hoping I was well, I observed my aunt&apos;s visage lengthen very much.</p><p>&apos;I am sorry for it, too,&apos; said my aunt, rubbing her nose. &apos;I have had no peace of mind, Trot, since I have been here.&apos; Before I could ask why, she told me.</p><p>&apos;I am convinced,&apos; said my aunt, laying her hand with melancholy firmness on the table, &apos;that Dick&apos;s character is not a character to keep the donkeys off. I am confident he wants strength of purpose. I ought to have left Janet at home, instead, and then my mind might perhaps have been at ease. If ever there was a donkey trespassing on my green,&apos; said my aunt, with emphasis, &apos;there was one this afternoon at four o&apos;clock. A cold feeling came over me from head to foot, and I know it was a donkey!&apos;</p><p>I tried to comfort her on this point, but she rejected consolation.</p><p>&apos;It was a donkey,&apos; said my aunt; &apos;and it was the one with the stumpy tail which that Murdering sister of a woman rode, when she came to my house.&apos; This had been, ever since, the only name my aunt knew for Miss Murdstone. &apos;If there is any Donkey in Dover, whose audacity it is harder to me to bear than another&apos;s, that,&apos; said my aunt, striking the table, &apos;is the animal!&apos;</p><p>Janet ventured to suggest that my aunt might be disturbing herself unnecessarily, and that she believed the donkey in question was then engaged in the sand-and-gravel line of business, and was not available for purposes of trespass. But my aunt wouldn&apos;t hear of it.</p><p>Supper was comfortably served and hot, though my aunt&apos;s rooms were very high up - whether that she might have more stone stairs for her money, or might be nearer to the door in the roof, I don&apos;t know - and consisted of a roast fowl, a steak, and some vegetables, to all of which I did ample justice, and which were all excellent. But my aunt had her own ideas concerning London provision, and ate but little.</p><p>&apos;I suppose this unfortunate fowl was born and brought up in a cellar,&apos; said my aunt, &apos;and never took the air except on a hackney coach-stand. I hope the steak may be beef, but I don&apos;t believe it. Nothing&apos;s genuine in the place, in my opinion, but the dirt.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Don&apos;t you think the fowl may have come out of the country, aunt?&apos; I hinted.</p><p>&apos;Certainly not,&apos; returned my aunt. &apos;It would be no pleasure to a London tradesman to sell anything which was what he pretended it was.&apos;</p><p>I did not venture to controvert this opinion, but I made a good supper, which it greatly satisfied her to see me do. When the table was cleared, Janet assisted her to arrange her hair, to put on her nightcap, which was of a smarter construction than usual (&apos;in case of fire&apos;, my aunt said), and to fold her gown back over her knees, these being her usual preparations for warming herself before going to bed. I then made her, according to certain established regulations from which no deviation, however slight, could ever be permitted, a glass of hot wine and water, and a slice of toast cut into long thin strips. With these accompaniments we were left alone to finish the evening, my aunt sitting opposite to me drinking her wine and water; soaking her strips of toast in it, one by one, before eating them; and looking benignantly on me, from among the borders of her nightcap.</p><p>&apos;Well, Trot,&apos; she began, &apos;what do you think of the proctor plan? Or have you not begun to think about it yet?&apos;</p><p>&apos;I have thought a good deal about it, my dear aunt, and I have talked a good deal about it with Steerforth. I like it very much indeed. I like it exceedingly.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Come!&apos; said my aunt. &apos;That&apos;s cheering!&apos;</p><p>&apos;I have only one difficulty, aunt.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Say what it is, Trot,&apos; she returned.</p><p>&apos;Why, I want to ask, aunt, as this seems, from what I understand, to be a limited profession, whether my entrance into it would not be very expensive?&apos;</p><p>&apos;It will cost,&apos; returned my aunt, &apos;to article you, just a thousand pounds.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Now, my dear aunt,&apos; said I, drawing my chair nearer, &apos;I am uneasy in my mind about that. It&apos;s a large sum of money. You have expended a great deal on my education, and have always been as liberal to me in all things as it was possible to be. You have been the soul of generosity. Surely there are some ways in which I might begin life with hardly any outlay, and yet begin with a good hope of getting on by resolution and exertion. Are you sure that it would not be better to try that course? Are you certain that you can afford to part with so much money, and that it is right that it should be so expended? I only ask you, my second mother, to consider. Are you certain?&apos;</p><p>My aunt finished eating the piece of toast on which she was then engaged, looking me full in the face all the while; and then setting her glass on the chimney-piece, and folding her hands upon her folded skirts, replied as follows:</p><p>&apos;Trot, my child, if I have any object in life, it is to provide for your being a good, a sensible, and a happy man. I am bent upon it - so is Dick. I should like some people that I know to hear Dick&apos;s conversation on the subject. Its sagacity is wonderful. But no one knows the resources of that man&apos;s intellect, except myself!&apos;</p><p>She stopped for a moment to take my hand between hers, and went on:</p><p>&apos;It&apos;s in vain, Trot, to recall the past, unless it works some influence upon the present. Perhaps I might have been better friends with your poor father. Perhaps I might have been better friends with that poor child your mother, even after your sister Betsey Trotwood disappointed me. When you came to me, a little runaway boy, all dusty and way-worn, perhaps I thought so. From that time until now, Trot, you have ever been a credit to me and a pride and a pleasure. I have no other claim upon my means; at least&apos; - here to my surprise she hesitated, and was confused - &apos;no, I have no other claim upon my means - and you are my adopted child. Only be a loving child to me in my age, and bear with my whims and fancies; and you will do more for an old woman whose prime of life was not so happy or conciliating as it might have been, than ever that old woman did for you.&apos;</p><p>It was the first time I had heard my aunt refer to her past history. There was a magnanimity in her quiet way of doing so, and of dismissing it, which would have exalted her in my respect and affection, if anything could.</p><p>&apos;All is agreed and understood between us, now, Trot,&apos; said my aunt, &apos;and we need talk of this no more. Give me a kiss, and we&apos;ll go to the Commons after breakfast tomorrow.&apos;</p><p>We had a long chat by the fire before we went to bed. I slept in a room on the same floor with my aunt&apos;s, and was a little disturbed in the course of the night by her knocking at my door as often as she was agitated by a distant sound of hackney-coaches or market-carts, and inquiring, &apos;if I heard the engines?&apos; But towards morning she slept better, and suffered me to do so too.</p><p>At about mid-day, we set out for the office of Messrs Spenlow and Jorkins, in Doctors&apos; Commons. My aunt, who had this other general opinion in reference to London, that every man she saw was a pickpocket, gave me her purse to carry for her, which had ten guineas in it and some silver.</p><p>We made a pause at the toy shop in Fleet Street, to see the giants of Saint Dunstan&apos;s strike upon the bells - we had timed our going, so as to catch them at it, at twelve o&apos;clock - and then went on towards Ludgate Hill, and St. Paul&apos;s Churchyard. We were crossing to the former place, when I found that my aunt greatly accelerated her speed, and looked frightened. I observed, at the same time, that a lowering ill-dressed man who had stopped and stared at us in passing, a little before, was coming so close after us as to brush against her.</p><p>&apos;Trot! My dear Trot!&apos; cried my aunt, in a terrified whisper, and pressing my arm. &apos;I don&apos;t know what I am to do.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Don&apos;t be alarmed,&apos; said I. &apos;There&apos;s nothing to be afraid of. Step into a shop, and I&apos;ll soon get rid of this fellow.&apos;</p><p>&apos;No, no, child!&apos; she returned. &apos;Don&apos;t speak to him for the world. I entreat, I order you!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Good Heaven, aunt!&apos; said I. &apos;He is nothing but a sturdy beggar.&apos;</p><p>&apos;You don&apos;t know what he is!&apos; replied my aunt. &apos;You don&apos;t know who he is! You don&apos;t know what you say!&apos;</p><p>We had stopped in an empty door-way, while this was passing, and he had stopped too.</p><p>&apos;Don&apos;t look at him!&apos; said my aunt, as I turned my head indignantly, &apos;but get me a coach, my dear, and wait for me in St. Paul&apos;s Churchyard.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Wait for you?&apos; I replied.</p><p>&apos;Yes,&apos; rejoined my aunt. &apos;I must go alone. I must go with him.&apos;</p><p>&apos;With him, aunt? This man?&apos;</p><p>&apos;I am in my senses,&apos; she replied, &apos;and I tell you I must. Get mea coach!&apos;</p><p>However much astonished I might be, I was sensible that I had no right to refuse compliance with such a peremptory command. I hurried away a few paces, and called a hackney-chariot which was passing empty. Almost before I could let down the steps, my aunt sprang in, I don&apos;t know how, and the man followed. She waved her hand to me to go away, so earnestly, that, all confounded as I was, I turned from them at once. In doing so, I heard her say to the coachman, &apos;Drive anywhere! Drive straight on!&apos; and presently the chariot passed me, going up the hill.</p><p>What Mr. Dick had told me, and what I had supposed to be a delusion of his, now came into my mind. I could not doubt that this person was the person of whom he had made such mysterious mention, though what the nature of his hold upon my aunt could possibly be, I was quite unable to imagine. After half an hour&apos;s cooling in the churchyard, I saw the chariot coming back. The driver stopped beside me, and my aunt was sitting in it alone.</p><p>She had not yet sufficiently recovered from her agitation to be quite prepared for the visit we had to make. She desired me to get into the chariot, and to tell the coachman to drive slowly up and down a little while. She said no more, except, &apos;My dear child, never ask me what it was, and don&apos;t refer to it,&apos; until she had perfectly regained her composure, when she told me she was quite herself now, and we might get out. On her giving me her purse to pay the driver, I found that all the guineas were gone, and only the loose silver remained.</p><p>Doctors&apos; Commons was approached by a little low archway. Before we had taken many paces down the street beyond it, the noise of the city seemed to melt, as if by magic, into a softened distance. A few dull courts and narrow ways brought us to the sky-lighted offices of Spenlow and Jorkins; in the vestibule of which temple, accessible to pilgrims without the ceremony of knocking, three or four clerks were at work as copyists. One of these, a little dry man, sitting by himself, who wore a stiff brown wig that looked as if it were made of gingerbread, rose to receive my aunt, and show us into Mr. Spenlow&apos;s room.</p><p>&apos;Mr. Spenlow&apos;s in Court, ma&apos;am,&apos; said the dry man; &apos;it&apos;s an Arches day; but it&apos;s close by, and I&apos;ll send for him directly.&apos;</p><p>As we were left to look about us while Mr. Spenlow was fetched, I availed myself of the opportunity. The furniture of the room was old-fashioned and dusty; and the green baize on the top of the writing-table had lost all its colour, and was as withered and pale as an old pauper. There were a great many bundles of papers on it, some endorsed as Allegations, and some (to my surprise) as Libels, and some as being in the Consistory Court, and some in the Arches Court, and some in the Prerogative Court, and some in the Admiralty Court, and some in the Delegates&apos; Court; giving me occasion to wonder much, how many Courts there might be in the gross, and how long it would take to understand them all. Besides these, there were sundry immense manuscript Books of Evidence taken on affidavit, strongly bound, and tied together in massive sets, a set to each cause, as if every cause were a history in ten or twenty volumes. All this looked tolerably expensive, I thought, and gave me an agreeable notion of a proctor&apos;s business. I was casting my eyes with increasing complacency over these and many similar objects, when hasty footsteps were heard in the room outside, and Mr. Spenlow, in a black gown trimmed with white fur, came hurrying in, taking off his hat as he came.</p><p>He was a little light-haired gentleman, with undeniable boots, and the stiffest of white cravats and shirt-collars. He was buttoned up, mighty trim and tight, and must have taken a great deal of pains with his whiskers, which were accurately curled. His gold watch-chain was so massive, that a fancy came across me, that he ought to have a sinewy golden arm, to draw it out with, like those which are put up over the goldbeaters&apos; shops. He was got up with such care, and was so stiff, that he could hardly bend himself; being obliged, when he glanced at some papers on his desk, after sitting down in his chair, to move his whole body, from the bottom of his spine, like Punch.</p><p>I had previously been presented by my aunt, and had been courteously received. He now said:</p><p>&apos;And so, Mr. Copperfield, you think of entering into our profession? I casually mentioned to Miss Trotwood, when I had the pleasure of an interview with her the other day,&apos; - with another inclination of his body - Punch again - &apos;that there was a vacancy here. Miss Trotwood was good enough to mention that she had a nephew who was her peculiar care, and for whom she was seeking to provide genteelly in life. That nephew, I believe, I have now the pleasure of&apos; - Punch again. I bowed my acknowledgements, and said, my aunt had mentioned to me that there was that opening, and that I believed I should like it very much. That I was strongly inclined to like it, and had taken immediately to the proposal. That I could not absolutely pledge myself to like it, until I knew something more about it. That although it was little else than a matter of form, I presumed I should have an opportunity of trying how I liked it, before I bound myself to it irrevocably.</p><p>&apos;Oh surely! surely!&apos; said Mr. Spenlow. &apos;We always, in this house, propose a month - an initiatory month. I should be happy, myself, to propose two months three - an indefinite period, in fact - but I have a partner. Mr. Jorkins.&apos;</p><p>&apos;And the premium, sir,&apos; I returned, &apos;is a thousand pounds?&apos;</p><p>&apos;And the premium, Stamp included, is a thousand pounds,&apos; said Mr. Spenlow. &apos;As I have mentioned to Miss Trotwood, I am actuated by no mercenary considerations; few men are less so, I believe; but Mr. Jorkins has his opinions on these subjects, and I am bound to respect Mr. Jorkins&apos;s opinions. Mr. Jorkins thinks a thousand pounds too little, in short.&apos;</p><p>&apos;I suppose, sir,&apos; said I, still desiring to spare my aunt, &apos;that it is not the custom here, if an articled clerk were particularly useful, and made himself a perfect master of his profession&apos; - I could not help blushing, this looked so like praising myself - &apos;I suppose it is not the custom, in the later years of his time, to allow him any -&apos;</p><p>Mr. Spenlow, by a great effort, just lifted his head far enough out of his cravat to shake it, and answered, anticipating the word &apos;salary&apos;:</p><p>&apos;No. I will not say what consideration I might give to that point myself, Mr. Copperfield, if I were unfettered. Mr. Jorkins is immovable.&apos;</p><p>I was quite dismayed by the idea of this terrible Jorkins. But I found out afterwards that he was a mild man of a heavy temperament, whose place in the business was to keep himself in the background, and be constantly exhibited by name as the most obdurate and ruthless of men. If a clerk wanted his salary raised, Mr. Jorkins wouldn&apos;t listen to such a proposition. If a client were slow to settle his bill of costs, Mr. Jorkins was resolved to have it paid; and however painful these things might be (and always were) to the feelings of Mr. Spenlow, Mr. Jorkins would have his bond. The heart and hand of the good angel Spenlow would have been always open, but for the restraining demon Jorkins. As I have grown older, I think I have had experience of some other houses doing business on the principle of Spenlow and Jorkins!</p><p>It was settled that I should begin my month&apos;s probation as soon as I pleased, and that my aunt need neither remain in town nor return at its expiration, as the articles of agreement, of which I was to be the subject, could easily be sent to her at home for her signature. When we had got so far, Mr. Spenlow offered to take me into Court then and there, and show me what sort of place it was. As I was willing enough to know, we went out with this object, leaving my aunt behind; who would trust herself, she said, in no such place, and who, I think, regarded all Courts of Law as a sort of powder-mills that might blow up at any time.</p><p>Mr. Spenlow conducted me through a paved courtyard formed of grave brick houses, which I inferred, from the Doctors&apos; names upon the doors, to be the official abiding-places of the learned advocates of whom Steerforth had told me; and into a large dull room, not unlike a chapel to my thinking, on the left hand. The upper part of this room was fenced off from the rest; and there, on the two sides of a raised platform of the horse-shoe form, sitting on easy old-fashioned dining-room chairs, were sundry gentlemen in red gowns and grey wigs, whom I found to be the Doctors aforesaid. Blinking over a little desk like a pulpit desk, in the curve of the horse-shoe, was an old gentleman, whom, if I had seen him in an aviary, I should certainly have taken for an owl, but who, I learned, was the presiding judge. In the space within the horse-shoe, lower than these, that is to say, on about the level of the floor, were sundry other gentlemen, of Mr. Spenlow&apos;s rank, and dressed like him in black gowns with white fur upon them, sitting at a long green table. Their cravats were in general stiff, I thought, and their looks haughty; but in this last respect I presently conceived I had done them an injustice, for when two or three of them had to rise and answer a question of the presiding dignitary, I never saw anything more sheepish. The public, represented by a boy with a comforter, and a shabby genteel man secretly eating crumbs out of his coat pockets, was warming itself at a stove in the centre of the Court. The languid stillness of the place was only broken by the chirping of this fire and by the voice of one of the Doctors, who was wandering slowly through a perfect library of evidence, and stopping to put up, from time to time, at little roadside inns of argument on the journey. Altogether, I have never, on any occasion, made one at such a cosey, dosey, old fashioned, time-forgotten, sleepy-headed little family-party in all my life; and I felt it would be quite a soothing opiate to belong to it in any character except perhaps as a suitor.</p><p>Very well satisfied with the dreamy nature of this retreat, I informed Mr. Spenlow that I had seen enough for that time, and we rejoined my aunt; in company with whom I presently departed from the Commons, feeling very young when I went out of Spenlow and Jorkins&apos;s, on account of the clerks poking one another with their pens to point me out.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
She then selected two or three  of the little instruments, and a  little bottle, and asked (to my surprise) if the table would bear]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/she-then-selected-two-or-three-of-the-little-instruments-and-a-little-bottle-and-asked-to-my-surprise-if-the-table-would-bear</link>
            <guid>Th2bJE3uwu0R55k4C4GN</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[On Steerforth&apos;s replying in the affirmative, she pushed a chair against it, and begging the assistance of my hand, mounted up, pretty nimbly, to the top, as if it were a stage. &apos;If either of you saw my ankles,&apos; she said, when she was safely elevated, &apos;say so, and I&apos;ll go home and destroy myself!&apos; &apos;I did not,&apos; said Steerforth. &apos;I did not,&apos; said I. &apos;Well then,&apos; cried Miss Mowcher,&apos; I&apos;ll consent to live. Now, ducky, ducky, duc...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Steerforth&apos;s replying in the affirmative, she pushed a chair against it, and begging the assistance of my hand, mounted up, pretty nimbly, to the top, as if it were a stage.</p><p>&apos;If either of you saw my ankles,&apos; she said, when she was safely elevated, &apos;say so, and I&apos;ll go home and destroy myself!&apos;</p><p>&apos;I did not,&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;I did not,&apos; said I.</p><p>&apos;Well then,&apos; cried Miss Mowcher,&apos; I&apos;ll consent to live. Now, ducky, ducky, ducky, come to Mrs. Bond and be killed.&apos;</p><p>This was an invocation to Steerforth to place himself under her hands; who, accordingly, sat himself down, with his back to the table, and his laughing face towards me, and submitted his head to her inspection, evidently for no other purpose than our entertainment. To see Miss Mowcher standing over him, looking at his rich profusion of brown hair through a large round magnifying glass, which she took out of her pocket, was a most amazing spectacle.</p><p>&apos;You&apos;re a pretty fellow!&apos; said Miss Mowcher, after a brief inspection. &apos;You&apos;d be as bald as a friar on the top of your head in twelve months, but for me. just half a minute, my young friend, and we&apos;ll give you a polishing that shall keep your curls on for the next ten years!&apos;</p><p>With this, she tilted some of the contents of the little bottle on to one of the little bits of flannel, and, again imparting some of the virtues of that preparation to one of the little brushes, began rubbing and scraping away with both on the crown of Steerforth&apos;s head in the busiest manner I ever witnessed, talking all the time.</p><p>&apos;There&apos;s Charley Pyegrave, the duke&apos;s son,&apos; she said. &apos;You know Charley?&apos; peeping round into his face.</p><p>&apos;A little,&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;What a man HE is! THERE&apos;S a whisker! As to Charley&apos;s legs, if they were only a pair (which they ain&apos;t), they&apos;d defy competition. Would you believe he tried to do without me - in the Life-Guards, too?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Mad!&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;It looks like it. However, mad or sane, he tried,&apos; returned Miss Mowcher. &apos;What does he do, but, lo and behold you, he goes into a perfumer&apos;s shop, and wants to buy a bottle of the Madagascar Liquid.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Charley does?&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;Charley does. But they haven&apos;t got any of the Madagascar Liquid.&apos;</p><p>&apos;What is it? Something to drink?&apos; asked Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;To drink?&apos; returned Miss Mowcher, stopping to slap his cheek. &apos;To doctor his own moustachios with, you know. There was a woman in the shop - elderly female - quite a Griffin - who had never even heard of it by name. &quot;Begging pardon, sir,&quot; said the Griffin to Charley, &quot;it&apos;s not - not - not ROUGE, is it?&quot; &quot;Rouge,&quot; said Charley to the Griffin. &quot;What the unmentionable to ears polite, do you think I want with rouge?&quot; &quot;No offence, sir,&quot; said the Griffin; &quot;we have it asked for by so many names, I thought it might be.&quot; Now that, my child,&apos; continued Miss Mowcher, rubbing all the time as busily as ever, &apos;is another instance of the refreshing humbug I was speaking of. I do something in that way myself - perhaps a good deal - perhaps a little - sharp&apos;s the word, my dear boy - never mind!&apos;</p><p>&apos;In what way do you mean? In the rouge way?&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;Put this and that together, my tender pupil,&apos; returned the wary Mowcher, touching her nose, &apos;work it by the rule of Secrets in all trades, and the product will give you the desired result. I say I do a little in that way myself. One Dowager, SHE calls it lip-salve. Another, SHE calls it gloves. Another, SHE calls it tucker-edging. Another, SHE calls it a fan. I call it whatever THEY call it. I supply it for &apos;em, but we keep up the trick so, to one another, and make believe with such a face, that they&apos;d as soon think of laying it on, before a whole drawing-room, as before me. And when I wait upon &apos;em, they&apos;ll say to me sometimes - WITH IT ON - thick, and no mistake - &quot;How am I looking, Mowcher? Am I pale?&quot; Ha! ha! ha! ha! Isn&apos;t THAT refreshing, my young friend!&apos;</p><p>I never did in my days behold anything like Mowcher as she stood upon the dining table, intensely enjoying this refreshment, rubbing busily at Steerforth&apos;s head, and winking at me over it.</p><p>&apos;Ah!&apos; she said. &apos;Such things are not much in demand hereabouts. That sets me off again! I haven&apos;t seen a pretty woman since I&apos;ve been here, jemmy.&apos;</p><p>&apos;No?&apos; said Steerforth.</p><p>&apos;Not the ghost of one,&apos; replied Miss Mowcher.</p><p>&apos;We could show her the substance of one, I think?&apos; said Steerforth, addressing his eyes to mine. &apos;Eh, Daisy?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Yes, indeed,&apos; said I.</p><p>&apos;Aha?&apos; cried the little creature, glancing sharply at my face, and then peeping round at Steerforth&apos;s. &apos;Umph?&apos;</p><p>The first exclamation sounded like a question put to both of us, and the second like a question put to Steerforth only. She seemed to have found no answer to either, but continued to rub, with her head on one side and her eye turned up, as if she were looking for an answer in the air and were confident of its appearing presently.</p><p>&apos;A sister of yours, Mr. Copperfield?&apos; she cried, after a pause, and still keeping the same look-out. &apos;Aye, aye?&apos;</p><p>&apos;No,&apos; said Steerforth, before I could reply. &apos;Nothing of the sort. On the contrary, Mr. Copperfield used - or I am much mistaken - to have a great admiration for her.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Why, hasn&apos;t he now?&apos; returned Miss Mowcher. &apos;Is he fickle? Oh, for shame! Did he sip every flower, and change every hour, until Polly his passion requited? Is her name Polly?&apos;</p><p>The Elfin suddenness with which she pounced upon me with this question, and a searching look, quite disconcerted me for a moment.</p><p>&apos;No, Miss Mowcher,&apos; I replied. &apos;Her name is Emily.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Aha?&apos; she cried exactly as before. &apos;Umph? What a rattle I am! Mr. Copperfield, ain&apos;t I volatile?&apos;</p><p>Her tone and look implied something that was not agreeable to me in connexion with the subject. So I said, in a graver manner than any of us had yet assumed: &apos;She is as virtuous as she is pretty. She is engaged to be married to a most worthy and deserving man in her own station of life. I esteem her for her good sense, as much as I admire her for her good looks.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Well said!&apos; cried Steerforth. &apos;Hear, hear, hear! Now I&apos;ll quench the curiosity of this little Fatima, my dear Daisy, by leaving her nothing to guess at. She is at present apprenticed, Miss Mowcher, or articled, or whatever it may be, to Omer and Joram, Haberdashers, Milliners, and so forth, in this town. Do you observe? Omer and Joram. The promise of which my friend has spoken, is made and entered into with her cousin; Christian name, Ham; surname, Peggotty; occupation, boat-builder; also of this town. She lives with a relative; Christian name, unknown; surname, Peggotty; occupation, seafaring; also of this town. She is the prettiest and most engaging little fairy in the world. I admire her - as my friend does - exceedingly. If it were not that I might appear to disparage her Intended, which I know my friend would not like, I would add, that to me she seems to be throwing herself away; that I am sure she might do better; and that I swear she was born to be a lady.&apos;</p><p>Miss Mowcher listened to these words, which were very slowly and distinctly spoken, with her head on one side, and her eye in the air as if she were still looking for that answer. When he ceased she became brisk again in an instant, and rattled away with surprising volubility.</p><p>&apos;Oh! And that&apos;s all about it, is it?&apos; she exclaimed, trimming his whiskers with a little restless pair of scissors, that went glancing round his head in all directions. &apos;Very well: very well! Quite a long story. Ought to end &quot;and they lived happy ever afterwards&quot;; oughtn&apos;t it? Ah! What&apos;s that game at forfeits? I love my love with an E, because she&apos;s enticing; I hate her with an E, because she&apos;s engaged. I took her to the sign of the exquisite, and treated her with an elopement, her name&apos;s Emily, and she lives in the east? Ha! ha! ha! Mr. Copperfield, ain&apos;t I volatile?&apos;</p><p>Merely looking at me with extravagant slyness, and not waiting for any reply, she continued, without drawing breath:</p><p>&apos;There! If ever any scapegrace was trimmed and touched up to perfection, you are, Steerforth. If I understand any noddle in the world, I understand yours. Do you hear me when I tell you that, my darling? I understand yours,&apos; peeping down into his face. &apos;Now you may mizzle, jemmy (as we say at Court), and if Mr. Copperfield will take the chair I&apos;ll operate on him.&apos;</p><p>&apos;What do you say, Daisy?&apos; inquired Steerforth, laughing, and resigning his seat. &apos;Will you be improved?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Thank you, Miss Mowcher, not this evening.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Don&apos;t say no,&apos; returned the little woman, looking at me with the aspect of a connoisseur; &apos;a little bit more eyebrow?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Thank you,&apos; I returned, &apos;some other time.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Have it carried half a quarter of an inch towards the temple,&apos; said Miss Mowcher. &apos;We can do it in a fortnight.&apos;</p><p>&apos;No, I thank you. Not at present.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Go in for a tip,&apos; she urged. &apos;No? Let&apos;s get the scaffolding up, then, for a pair of whiskers. Come!&apos;</p><p>I could not help blushing as I declined, for I felt we were on my weak point, now. But Miss Mowcher, finding that I was not at present disposed for any decoration within the range of her art, and that I was, for the time being, proof against the blandishments of the small bottle which she held up before one eye to enforce her persuasions, said we would make a beginning on an early day, and requested the aid of my hand to descend from her elevated station. Thus assisted, she skipped down with much agility, and began to tie her double chin into her bonnet.</p><p>&apos;The fee,&apos; said Steerforth, &apos;is -&apos;</p><p>&apos;Five bob,&apos; replied Miss Mowcher, &apos;and dirt cheap, my chicken. Ain&apos;t I volatile, Mr. Copperfield?&apos;</p><p>I replied politely: &apos;Not at all.&apos; But I thought she was rather so, when she tossed up his two half-crowns like a goblin pieman, caught them, dropped them in her pocket, and gave it a loud slap.</p><p>&apos;That&apos;s the Till!&apos; observed Miss Mowcher, standing at the chair again, and replacing in the bag a miscellaneous collection of little objects she had emptied out of it. &apos;Have I got all my traps? It seems so. It won&apos;t do to be like long Ned Beadwood, when they took him to church &quot;to marry him to somebody&quot;, as he says, and left the bride behind. Ha! ha! ha! A wicked rascal, Ned, but droll! Now, I know I&apos;m going to break your hearts, but I am forced to leave you. You must call up all your fortitude, and try to bear it. Good-bye, Mr. Copperfield! Take care of yourself, jockey of Norfolk! How I have been rattling on! It&apos;s all the fault of you two wretches. I forgive you! &quot;Bob swore!&quot; - as the Englishman said for &quot;Good night&quot;, when he first learnt French, and thought it so like English. &quot;Bob swore,&quot; my ducks!&apos;</p><p>With the bag slung over her arm, and rattling as she waddled away, she waddled to the door, where she stopped to inquire if she should leave us a lock of her hair. &apos;Ain&apos;t I volatile?&apos; she added, as a commentary on this offer, and, with her finger on her nose, departed.</p><p>Steerforth laughed to that degree, that it was impossible for me to help laughing too; though I am not sure I should have done so, but for this inducement. When we had had our laugh quite out, which was after some time, he told me that Miss Mowcher had quite an extensive connexion, and made herself useful to a variety of people in a variety of ways. Some people trifled with her as a mere oddity, he said; but she was as shrewdly and sharply observant as anyone he knew, and as long-headed as she was short-armed. He told me that what she had said of being here, and there, and everywhere, was true enough; for she made little darts into the provinces, and seemed to pick up customers everywhere, and to know everybody. I asked him what her disposition was: whether it was at all mischievous, and if her sympathies were generally on the right side of things: but, not succeeding in attracting his attention to these questions after two or three attempts, I forbore or forgot to repeat them. He told me instead, with much rapidity, a good deal about her skill, and her profits; and about her being a scientific cupper, if I should ever have occasion for her service in that capacity.</p><p>She was the principal theme of our conversation during the evening: and when we parted for the night Steerforth called after me over the banisters, &apos;Bob swore!&apos; as I went downstairs.</p><p>I was surprised, when I came to Mr. Barkis&apos;s house, to find Ham walking up and down in front of it, and still more surprised to learn from him that little Em&apos;ly was inside. I naturally inquired why he was not there too, instead of pacing the streets by himself?</p><p>&apos;Why, you see, Mas&apos;r Davy,&apos; he rejoined, in a hesitating manner, &apos;Em&apos;ly, she&apos;s talking to some &apos;un in here.&apos;</p><p>&apos;I should have thought,&apos; said I, smiling, &apos;that that was a reason for your being in here too, Ham.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Well, Mas&apos;r Davy, in a general way, so &apos;t would be,&apos; he returned; &apos;but look&apos;ee here, Mas&apos;r Davy,&apos; lowering his voice, and speaking very gravely. &apos;It&apos;s a young woman, sir - a young woman, that Em&apos;ly knowed once, and doen&apos;t ought to know no more.&apos;</p><p>When I heard these words, a light began to fall upon the figure I had seen following them, some hours ago.</p><p>&apos;It&apos;s a poor wurem, Mas&apos;r Davy,&apos; said Ham, &apos;as is trod under foot by all the town. Up street and down street. The mowld o&apos; the churchyard don&apos;t hold any that the folk shrink away from, more.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Did I see her tonight, Ham, on the sand, after we met you?&apos;</p><p>&apos;Keeping us in sight?&apos; said Ham. &apos;It&apos;s like you did, Mas&apos;r Davy. Not that I know&apos;d then, she was theer, sir, but along of her creeping soon arterwards under Em&apos;ly&apos;s little winder, when she see the light come, and whispering &quot;Em&apos;ly, Em&apos;ly, for Christ&apos;s sake, have a woman&apos;s heart towards me. I was once like you!&quot; Those was solemn words, Mas&apos;r Davy, fur to hear!&apos;</p><p>&apos;They were indeed, Ham. What did Em&apos;ly do?&apos; &apos;Says Em&apos;ly, &quot;Martha, is it you? Oh, Martha, can it be you?&quot; - for they had sat at work together, many a day, at Mr. Omer&apos;s.&apos;</p><p>&apos;I recollect her now!&apos; cried I, recalling one of the two girls I had seen when I first went there. &apos;I recollect her quite well!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Martha Endell,&apos; said Ham. &apos;Two or three year older than Em&apos;ly, but was at the school with her.&apos;</p><p>&apos;I never heard her name,&apos; said I. &apos;I didn&apos;t mean to interrupt you.&apos;</p><p>&apos;For the matter o&apos; that, Mas&apos;r Davy,&apos; replied Ham, &apos;all&apos;s told a&apos;most in them words, &quot;Em&apos;ly, Em&apos;ly, for Christ&apos;s sake, have a woman&apos;s heart towards me. I was once like you!&quot; She wanted to speak to Em&apos;ly. Em&apos;ly couldn&apos;t speak to her theer, for her loving uncle was come home, and he wouldn&apos;t - no, Mas&apos;r Davy,&apos; said Ham, with great earnestness, &apos;he couldn&apos;t, kind-natur&apos;d, tender-hearted as he is, see them two together, side by side, for all the treasures that&apos;s wrecked in the sea.&apos;</p><p>I felt how true this was. I knew it, on the instant, quite as well as Ham.</p><p>&apos;So Em&apos;ly writes in pencil on a bit of paper,&apos; he pursued, &apos;and gives it to her out o&apos; winder to bring here. &quot;Show that,&quot; she says, &quot;to my aunt, Mrs. Barkis, and she&apos;ll set you down by her fire, for the love of me, till uncle is gone out, and I can come.&quot; By and by she tells me what I tell you, Mas&apos;r Davy, and asks me to bring her. What can I do? She doen&apos;t ought to know any such, but I can&apos;t deny her, when the tears is on her face.&apos;</p><p>He put his hand into the breast of his shaggy jacket, and took out with great care a pretty little purse.</p><p>&apos;And if I could deny her when the tears was on her face, Mas&apos;r Davy,&apos; said Ham, tenderly adjusting it on the rough palm of his hand, &apos;how could I deny her when she give me this to carry for her - knowing what she brought it for? Such a toy as it is!&apos; said Ham, thoughtfully looking on it. &apos;With such a little money in it, Em&apos;ly my dear.&apos;</p><p>I shook him warmly by the hand when he had put it away again - for that was more satisfactory to me than saying anything - and we walked up and down, for a minute or two, in silence. The door opened then, and Peggotty appeared, beckoning to Ham to come in. I would have kept away, but she came after me, entreating me to come in too. Even then, I would have avoided the room where they all were, but for its being the neat-tiled kitchen I have mentioned more than once. The door opening immediately into it, I found myself among them before I considered whither I was going.</p><p>The girl - the same I had seen upon the sands - was near the fire. She was sitting on the ground, with her head and one arm lying on a chair. I fancied, from the disposition of her figure, that Em&apos;ly had but newly risen from the chair, and that the forlorn head might perhaps have been lying on her lap. I saw but little of the girl&apos;s face, over which her hair fell loose and scattered, as if she had been disordering it with her own hands; but I saw that she was young, and of a fair complexion. Peggotty had been crying. So had little Em&apos;ly. Not a word was spoken when we first went in; and the Dutch clock by the dresser seemed, in the silence, to tick twice as loud as usual. Em&apos;ly spoke first.</p><p>&apos;Martha wants,&apos; she said to Ham, &apos;to go to London.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Why to London?&apos; returned Ham.</p><p>He stood between them, looking on the prostrate girl with a mixture of compassion for her, and of jealousy of her holding any companionship with her whom he loved so well, which I have always remembered distinctly. They both spoke as if she were ill; in a soft, suppressed tone that was plainly heard, although it hardly rose above a whisper.</p><p>&apos;Better there than here,&apos; said a third voice aloud - Martha&apos;s, though she did not move. &apos;No one knows me there. Everybody knows me here.&apos;</p><p>&apos;What will she do there?&apos; inquired Ham.</p><p>She lifted up her head, and looked darkly round at him for a moment; then laid it down again, and curved her right arm about her neck, as a woman in a fever, or in an agony of pain from a shot, might twist herself.</p><p>&apos;She will try to do well,&apos; said little Em&apos;ly. &apos;You don&apos;t know what she has said to us. Does he - do they - aunt?&apos;</p><p>Peggotty shook her head compassionately.</p><p>&apos;I&apos;ll try,&apos; said Martha, &apos;if you&apos;ll help me away. I never can do worse than I have done here. I may do better. Oh!&apos; with a dreadful shiver, &apos;take me out of these streets, where the whole town knows me from a child!&apos;</p><p>As Em&apos;ly held out her hand to Ham, I saw him put in it a little canvas bag. She took it, as if she thought it were her purse, and made a step or two forward; but finding her mistake, came back to where he had retired near me, and showed it to him.</p><p>&apos;It&apos;s all yourn, Em&apos;ly,&apos; I could hear him say. &apos;I haven&apos;t nowt in all the wureld that ain&apos;t yourn, my dear. It ain&apos;t of no delight to me, except for you!&apos;</p><p>The tears rose freshly in her eyes, but she turned away and went to Martha. What she gave her, I don&apos;t know. I saw her stooping over her, and putting money in her bosom. She whispered something, as she asked was that enough? &apos;More than enough,&apos; the other said, and took her hand and kissed it.</p><p>Then Martha arose, and gathering her shawl about her, covering her face with it, and weeping aloud, went slowly to the door. She stopped a moment before going out, as if she would have uttered something or turned back; but no word passed her lips. Making the same low, dreary, wretched moaning in her shawl, she went away.</p><p>As the door closed, little Em&apos;ly looked at us three in a hurried manner and then hid her face in her hands, and fell to sobbing.</p><p>&apos;Doen&apos;t, Em&apos;ly!&apos; said Ham, tapping her gently on the shoulder. &apos;Doen&apos;t, my dear! You doen&apos;t ought to cry so, pretty!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Oh, Ham!&apos; she exclaimed, still weeping pitifully, &apos;I am not so good a girl as I ought to be! I know I have not the thankful heart, sometimes, I ought to have!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Yes, yes, you have, I&apos;m sure,&apos; said Ham.</p><p>&apos;No! no! no!&apos; cried little Em&apos;ly, sobbing, and shaking her head. &apos;I am not as good a girl as I ought to be. Not near! not near!&apos; And still she cried, as if her heart would break.</p><p>&apos;I try your love too much. I know I do!&apos; she sobbed. &apos;I&apos;m often cross to you, and changeable with you, when I ought to be far different. You are never so to me. Why am I ever so to you, when I should think of nothing but how to be grateful, and to make you happy!&apos;</p><p>&apos;You always make me so,&apos; said Ham, &apos;my dear! I am happy in the sight of you. I am happy, all day long, in the thoughts of you.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Ah! that&apos;s not enough!&apos; she cried. &apos;That is because you are good; not because I am! Oh, my dear, it might have been a better fortune for you, if you had been fond of someone else - of someone steadier and much worthier than me, who was all bound up in you, and never vain and changeable like me!&apos;</p><p>&apos;Poor little tender-heart,&apos; said Ham, in a low voice. &apos;Martha has overset her, altogether.&apos;</p><p>&apos;Please, aunt,&apos; sobbed Em&apos;ly, &apos;come here, and let me lay my head upon you. Oh, I am very miserable tonight, aunt! Oh, I am not as good a girl as I ought to be. I am not, I know!&apos;</p><p>Peggotty had hastened to the chair before the fire. Em&apos;ly, with her arms around her neck, kneeled by her, looking up most earnestly into her face.</p><p>&apos;Oh, pray, aunt, try to help me! Ham, dear, try to help me! Mr. David, for the sake of old times, do, please, try to help me! I want to be a better girl than I am. I want to feel a hundred times more thankful than I do. I want to feel more, what a blessed thing it is to be the wife of a good man, and to lead a peaceful life. Oh me, oh me! Oh my heart, my heart!&apos;</p><p>She dropped her face on my old nurse&apos;s breast, and, ceasing this supplication, which in its agony and grief was half a woman&apos;s, half a child&apos;s, as all her manner was (being, in that, more natural, and better suited to her beauty, as I thought, than any other manner could have been), wept silently, while my old nurse hushed her like an infant.</p><p>She got calmer by degrees, and then we soothed her; now talking encouragingly, and now jesting a little with her, until she began to raise her head and speak to us. So we got on, until she was able to smile, and then to laugh, and then to sit up, half ashamed; while Peggotty recalled her stray ringlets, dried her eyes, and made her neat again, lest her uncle should wonder, when she got home, why his darling had been crying.</p><p>I saw her do, that night, what I had never seen her do before. I saw her innocently kiss her chosen husband on the cheek, and creep close to his bluff form as if it were her best support. When they went away together, in the waning moonlight, and I looked after them, comparing their departure in my mind with Martha&apos;s, I saw that she held his arm with both her hands, and still kept close to him.</p><p>CHAPTER 23 I CORROBORATE Mr. DICK, AND CHOOSE A PROFESSION</p><p>When I awoke in the morning I thought very much of little Em&apos;ly, and her emotion last night, after Martha had left. I felt as if I had come into the knowledge of those domestic weaknesses and tendernesses in a sacred confidence, and that to disclose them, even to Steerforth, would be wrong. I had no gentler feeling towards anyone than towards the pretty creature who had been my playmate, and whom I have always been persuaded, and shall always be persuaded, to my dying day, I then devotedly loved. The repetition to any ears - even to Steerforth&apos;s - of what she had been unable to repress when her heart lay open to me by an accident, I felt would be a rough deed, unworthy of myself, unworthy of the light of our pure childhood, which I always saw encircling her head. I made a resolution, therefore, to keep it in my own breast; and there it gave her image a new grace.</p><p>While we were at breakfast, a letter was delivered to me from my aunt. As it contained matter on which I thought Steerforth could advise me as well as anyone, and on which I knew I should be delighted to consult him, I resolved to make it a subject of discussion on our journey home. For the present we had enough to do, in taking leave of all our friends. Mr. Barkis was far from being the last among them, in his regret at our departure; and I believe would even have opened the box again, and sacrificed another guinea, if it would have kept us eight-and-forty hours in Yarmouth. Peggotty and all her family were full of grief at our going. The whole house of Omer and Joram turned out to bid us good-bye; and there were so many seafaring volunteers in attendance on Steerforth, when our portmanteaux went to the coach, that if we had had the baggage of a regiment with us, we should hardly have wanted porters to carry it. In a word, we departed to the regret and admiration of all concerned, and left a great many people very sorry behind US.</p><p>Do you stay long here, Littimer?&apos; said I, as he stood waiting to see the coach start.</p><p>&apos;No, sir,&apos; he replied; &apos;probably not very long, sir.&apos;</p><p>&apos;He can hardly say, just now,&apos; observed Steerforth, carelessly. &apos;He knows what he has to do, and he&apos;ll do it.&apos;</p><p>&apos;That I am sure he will,&apos; said I.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
But now, farewell--a long farewell--to happiness, winter or summer! Farewell to smiles and laughter]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/but-now-farewell-a-long-farewell-to-happiness-winter-or-summer-farewell-to-smiles-and-laughter</link>
            <guid>d6uduZ57QsvlZleHXvCs</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 14:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Farewell to peace of mind! Farewell to hope and to tranquil dreams, and to the blessed consolations of sleep. For more than three years and a half I am summoned away from these. I am now arrived at an Iliad of woes, for I have now to record THE PAINS OF OPIUM As when some great painter dips His pencil in the gloom of earthquake and eclipse. SHELLEY&apos;S Revolt of Islam. Reader, who have thus far accompanied me, I must request your attention to a brief explanatory note on three points:For se...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farewell to peace of mind! Farewell to hope and to tranquil dreams, and to the blessed consolations of sleep. For more than three years and a half I am summoned away from these. I am now arrived at an Iliad of woes, for I have now to record</p><p>THE PAINS OF OPIUM</p><p>As when some great painter dips His pencil in the gloom of earthquake and eclipse. SHELLEY&apos;S Revolt of Islam.</p><p>Reader, who have thus far accompanied me, I must request your attention to a brief explanatory note on three points:</p><ol><li><p>For several reasons I have not been able to compose the notes for this part of my narrative into any regular and connected shape. I give the notes disjointed as I find them, or have now drawn them up from memory. Some of them point to their own date, some I have dated, and some are undated. Whenever it could answer my purpose to transplant them from the natural or chronological order, I have not scrupled to do so. Sometimes I speak in the present, sometimes in the past tense. Few of the notes, perhaps, were written exactly at the period of time to which they relate; but this can little affect their accuracy, as the impressions were such that they can never fade from my mind. Much has been omitted. I could not, without effort, constrain myself to the task of either recalling, or constructing into a regular narrative, the whole burthen of horrors which lies upon my brain. This feeling partly I plead in excuse, and partly that I am now in London, and am a helpless sort of person, who cannot even arrange his own papers without assistance; and I am separated from the hands which are wont to perform for me the offices of an amanuensis.</p></li><li><p>You will think perhaps that I am too confidential and communicative of my own private history. It may be so. But my way of writing is rather to think aloud, and follow my own humours, than much to consider who is listening to me; and if I stop to consider what is proper to be said to this or that person, I shall soon come to doubt whether any part at all is proper. The fact is, I place myself at a distance of fifteen or twenty years ahead of this time, and suppose myself writing to those who will be interested about me hereafter; and wishing to have some record of time, the entire history of which no one can know but myself, I do it as fully as I am able with the efforts I am now capable of making, because I know not whether I can ever find time to do it again.</p></li><li><p>It will occur to you often to ask, why did I not release myself from the horrors of opium by leaving it off or diminishing it? To this I must answer briefly: it might be supposed that I yielded to the fascinations of opium too easily; it cannot be supposed that any man can be charmed by its terrors. The reader may be sure, therefore, that I made attempts innumerable to reduce the quantity. I add, that those who witnessed the agonies of those attempts, and not myself, were the first to beg me to desist. But could not have I reduced it a drop a day, or, by adding water, have bisected or trisected a drop? A thousand drops bisected would thus have taken nearly six years to reduce, and that way would certainly not have answered. But this is a common mistake of those who know nothing of opium experimentally; I appeal to those who do, whether it is not always found that down to a certain point it can be reduced with ease and even pleasure, but that after that point further reduction causes intense suffering. Yes, say many thoughtless persons, who know not what they are talking of, you will suffer a little low spirits and dejection for a few days. I answer, no; there is nothing like low spirits; on the contrary, the mere animal spirits are uncommonly raised: the pulse is improved: the health is better. It is not there that the suffering lies. It has no resemblance to the sufferings caused by renouncing wine. It is a state of unutterable irritation of stomach (which surely is not much like dejection), accompanied by intense perspirations, and feelings such as I shall not attempt to describe without more space at my command.</p></li></ol><p>I shall now enter in medias res, and shall anticipate, from a time when my opium pains might be said to be at their acme, an account of their palsying effects on the intellectual faculties.</p><p>My studies have now been long interrupted. I cannot read to myself with any pleasure, hardly with a moment&apos;s endurance. Yet I read aloud sometimes for the pleasure of others, because reading is an accomplishment of mine, and, in the slang use of the word &quot;accomplishment&quot; as a superficial and ornamental attainment, almost the only one I possess; and formerly, if I had any vanity at all connected with any endowment or attainment of mine, it was with this, for I had observed that no accomplishment was so rare. Players are the worst readers of all: --reads vilely; and Mrs. -, who is so celebrated, can read nothing well but dramatic compositions: Milton she cannot read sufferably. People in general either read poetry without any passion at all, or else overstep the modesty of nature, and read not like scholars. Of late, if I have felt moved by anything it has been by the grand lamentations of Samson Agonistes, or the great harmonies of the Satanic speeches in Paradise Regained, when read aloud by myself. A young lady sometimes comes and drinks tea with us: at her request and M.&apos;s, I now and then read W-&apos;s poems to them. (W., by-the-bye is the only poet I ever met who could read his own verses: often indeed he reads admirably.)</p><p>For nearly two years I believe that I read no book, but one; and I owe it to the author, in discharge of a great debt of gratitude, to mention what that was. The sublimer and more passionate poets I still read, as I have said, by snatches, and occasionally. But my proper vocation, as I well know, was the exercise of the analytic understanding. Now, for the most part analytic studies are continuous, and not to be pursued by fits and starts, or fragmentary efforts. Mathematics, for instance, intellectual philosophy, &amp;c,, were all become insupportable to me; I shrunk from them with a sense of powerless and infantine feebleness that gave me an anguish the greater from remembering the time when I grappled with them to my own hourly delight; and for this further reason, because I had devoted the labour of my whole life, and had dedicated my intellect, blossoms and fruits, to the slow and elaborate toil of constructing one single work, to which I had presumed to give the title of an unfinished work of Spinosa&apos;s--viz., De Emendatione Humani Intellectus. This was now lying locked up, as by frost, like any Spanish bridge or aqueduct, begun upon too great a scale for the resources of the architect; and instead of reviving me as a monument of wishes at least, and aspirations, and a life of labour dedicated to the exaltation of human nature in that way in which God had best fitted me to promote so great an object, it was likely to stand a memorial to my children of hopes defeated, of baffled efforts, of materials uselessly accumulated, of foundations laid that were never to support a super-structure--of the grief and the ruin of the architect. In this state of imbecility I had, for amusement, turned my attention to political economy; my understanding, which formerly had been as active and restless as a hyaena, could not, I suppose (so long as I lived at all) sink into utter lethargy; and political economy offers this advantage to a person in my state, that though it is eminently an organic science (no part, that is to say, but what acts on the whole as the whole again reacts on each part), yet the several parts may be detached and contemplated singly. Great as was the prostration of my powers at this time, yet I could not forget my knowledge; and my understanding had been for too many years intimate with severe thinkers, with logic, and the great masters of knowledge, not to be aware of the utter feebleness of the main herd of modern economists. I had been led in 1811 to look into loads of books and pamphlets on many branches of economy; and, at my desire, M. sometimes read to me chapters from more recent works, or parts of parliamentary debates. I saw that these were generally the very dregs and rinsings of the human intellect; and that any man of sound head, and practised in wielding logic with a scholastic adroitness, might take up the whole academy of modern economists, and throttle them between heaven and earth with his finger and thumb, or bray their fungus-heads to powder with a lady&apos;s fan. At length, in 1819, a friend in Edinburgh sent me down Mr. Ricardo&apos;s book; and recurring to my own prophetic anticipation of the advent of some legislator for this science, I said, before I had finished the first chapter, &quot;Thou art the man!&quot; Wonder and curiosity were emotions that had long been dead in me. Yet I wondered once more: I wondered at myself that I could once again be stimulated to the effort of reading, and much more I wondered at the book. Had this profound work been really written in England during the nineteenth century? Was it possible? I supposed thinking {19} had been extinct in England. Could it be that an Englishman, and he not in academic bowers, but oppressed by mercantile and senatorial cares, had accomplished what all the universities of Europe and a century of thought had failed even to advance by one hair&apos;s breadth? All other writers had been crushed and overlaid by the enormous weight of facts and documents. Mr. Ricardo had deduced a priori from the understanding itself laws which first gave a ray of light into the unwieldy chaos of materials, and had constructed what had been but a collection of tentative discussions into a science of regular proportions, now first standing on an eternal basis.</p><p>Thus did one single work of a profound understanding avail to give me a pleasure and an activity which I had not known for years. It roused me even to write, or at least to dictate what M. wrote for me. It seemed to me that some important truths had escaped even &quot;the inevitable eye&quot; of Mr. Ricardo; and as these were for the most part of such a nature that I could express or illustrate them more briefly and elegantly by algebraic symbols than in the usual clumsy and loitering diction of economists, the whole would not have filled a pocket-book; and being so brief, with M. for my amanuensis, even at this time, incapable as I was of all general exertion, I drew up my PROLEGOMENA TO ALL FUTURE SYSTEMS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY. I hope it will not be found redolent of opium; though, indeed, to most people the subject is a sufficient opiate.</p><p>This exertion, however, was but a temporary flash, as the sequel showed; for I designed to publish my work. Arrangements were made at a provincial press, about eighteen miles distant, for printing it. An additional compositor was retained for some days on this account. The work was even twice advertised, and I was in a manner pledged to the fulfilment of my intention. But I had a preface to write, and a dedication, which I wished to make a splendid one, to Mr. Ricardo. I found myself quite unable to accomplish all this. The arrangements were countermanded, the compositor dismissed, and my &quot;Prolegomena&quot; rested peacefully by the side of its elder and more dignified brother.</p><p>I have thus described and illustrated my intellectual torpor in terms that apply more or less to every part of the four years during which I was under the Circean spells of opium. But for misery and suffering, I might indeed be said to have existed in a dormant state. I seldom could prevail on myself to write a letter; an answer of a few words to any that I received was the utmost that I could accomplish, and often THAT not until the letter had lain weeks or even months on my writing-table. Without the aid of M. all records of bills paid or TO BE paid must have perished, and my whole domestic economy, whatever became of Political Economy, must have gone into irretrievable confusion. I shall not afterwards allude to this part of the case. It is one, however, which the opium-eater will find, in the end, as oppressive and tormenting as any other, from the sense of incapacity and feebleness, from the direct embarrassments incident to the neglect or procrastination of each day&apos;s appropriate duties, and from the remorse which must often exasperate the stings of these evils to a reflective and conscientious mind. The opium-eater loses none of his moral sensibilities or aspirations. He wishes and longs as earnestly as ever to realize what he believes possible, and feels to be exacted by duty; but his intellectual apprehension of what is possible infinitely outruns his power, not of execution only, but even of power to attempt. He lies under the weight of incubus and nightmare; he lies in sight of all that he would fain perform, just as a man forcibly confined to his bed by the mortal languor of a relaxing disease, who is compelled to witness injury or outrage offered to some object of his tenderest love: he curses the spells which chain him down from motion; he would lay down his life if he might but get up and walk; but he is powerless as an infant, and cannot even attempt to rise.</p><p>I now pass to what is the main subject of these latter confessions, to the history and journal of what took place in my dreams, for these were the immediate and proximate cause of my acutest suffering.</p><p>The first notice I had of any important change going on in this part of my physical economy was from the reawakening of a state of eye generally incident to childhood, or exalted states of irritability. I know not whether my reader is aware that many children, perhaps most, have a power of painting, as it were upon the darkness, all sorts of phantoms. In some that power is simply a mechanical affection of the eye; others have a voluntary or semi-voluntary power to dismiss or to summon them; or, as a child once said to me when I questioned him on this matter, &quot;I can tell them to go, and they go -, but sometimes they come when I don&apos;t tell them to come.&quot; Whereupon I told him that he had almost as unlimited a command over apparitions as a Roman centurion over his soldiers.--In the middle of 1817, I think it was, that this faculty became positively distressing to me: at night, when I lay awake in bed, vast processions passed along in mournful pomp; friezes of never-ending stories, that to my feelings were as sad and solemn as if they were stories drawn from times before OEdipus or Priam, before Tyre, before Memphis. And at the same time a corresponding change took place in my dreams; a theatre seemed suddenly opened and lighted up within my brain, which presented nightly spectacles of more than earthly splendour. And the four following facts may be mentioned as noticeable at this time:</p><ol><li><p>That as the creative state of the eye increased, a sympathy seemed to arise between the waking and the dreaming states of the brain in one point--that whatsoever I happened to call up and to trace by a voluntary act upon the darkness was very apt to transfer itself to my dreams, so that I feared to exercise this faculty; for, as Midas turned all things to gold that yet baffled his hopes and defrauded his human desires, so whatsoever things capable of being visually represented I did but think of in the darkness, immediately shaped themselves into phantoms of the eye; and by a process apparently no less inevitable, when thus once traced in faint and visionary colours, like writings in sympathetic ink, they were drawn out by the fierce chemistry of my dreams into insufferable splendour that fretted my heart.</p></li><li><p>For this and all other changes in my dreams were accompanied by deep-seated anxiety and gloomy melancholy, such as are wholly incommunicable by words. I seemed every night to descend, not metaphorically, but literally to descend, into chasms and sunless abysses, depths below depths, from which it seemed hopeless that I could ever reascend. Nor did I, by waking, feel that I HAD reascended. This I do not dwell upon; because the state of gloom which attended these gorgeous spectacles, amounting at last to utter darkness, as of some suicidal despondency, cannot be approached by words.</p></li><li><p>The sense of space, and in the end the sense of time, were both powerfully affected. Buildings, landscapes, &amp;c., were exhibited in proportions so vast as the bodily eye is not fitted to receive. Space swelled, and was amplified to an extent of unutterable infinity. This, however, did not disturb me so much as the vast expansion of time; I sometimes seemed to have lived for 70 or 100 years in one night--nay, sometimes had feelings representative of a millennium passed in that time, or, however, of a duration far beyond the limits of any human experience.</p></li><li><p>The minutest incidents of childhood, or forgotten scenes of later years, were often revived: I could not be said to recollect them, for if I had been told of them when waking, I should not have been able to acknowledge them as parts of my past experience. But placed as they were before me, in dreams like intuitions, and clothed in all their evanescent circumstances and accompanying feelings, I RECOGNISED them instantaneously. I was once told by a near relative of mine, that having in her childhood fallen into a river, and being on the very verge of death but for the critical assistance which reached her, she saw in a moment her whole life, in its minutest incidents, arrayed before her simultaneously as in a mirror; and she had a faculty developed as suddenly for comprehending the whole and every part. This, from some opium experiences of mine, I can believe; I have indeed seen the same thing asserted twice in modern books, and accompanied by a remark which I am convinced is true; viz., that the dread book of account which the Scriptures speak of is in fact the mind itself of each individual. Of this at least I feel assured, that there is no such thing as FORGETTING possible to the mind; a thousand accidents may and will interpose a veil between our present consciousness and the secret inscriptions on the mind; accidents of the same sort will also rend away this veil; but alike, whether veiled or unveiled, the inscription remains for ever, just as the stars seem to withdraw before the common light of day, whereas in fact we all know that it is the light which is drawn over them as a veil, and that they are waiting to be revealed when the obscuring daylight shall have withdrawn.</p></li></ol><p>Having noticed these four facts as memorably distinguishing my dreams from those of health, I shall now cite a case illustrative of the first fact, and shall then cite any others that I remember, either in their chronological order, or any other that may give them more effect as pictures to the reader.</p><p>I had been in youth, and even since, for occasional amusement, a great reader of Livy, whom I confess that I prefer, both for style and matter, to any other of the Roman historians; and I had often felt as most solemn and appalling sounds, and most emphatically representative of the majesty of the Roman people, the two words so often occurring in Livy--Consul Romanus, especially when the consul is introduced in his military character. I mean to say that the words king, sultan, regent, &amp;c., or any other titles of those who embody in their own persons the collective majesty of a great people, had less power over my reverential feelings. I had also, though no great reader of history, made myself minutely and critically familiar with one period of English history, viz., the period of the Parliamentary War, having been attracted by the moral grandeur of some who figured in that day, and by the many interesting memoirs which survive those unquiet times. Both these parts of my lighter reading, having furnished me often with matter of reflection, now furnished me with matter for my dreams. Often I used to see, after painting upon the blank darkness a sort of rehearsal whilst waking, a crowd of ladies, and perhaps a festival and dances. And I heard it said, or I said to myself, &quot;These are English ladies from the unhappy times of Charles I. These are the wives and the daughters of those who met in peace, and sate at the same table, and were allied by marriage or by blood; and yet, after a certain day in August 1642, never smiled upon each other again, nor met but in the field of battle; and at Marston Moor, at Newbury, or at Naseby, cut asunder all ties of love by the cruel sabre, and washed away in blood the memory of ancient friendship.&quot; The ladies danced, and looked as lovely as the court of George IV. Yet I knew, even in my dream, that they had been in the grave for nearly two centuries. This pageant would suddenly dissolve; and at a clapping of hands would be heard the heart-quaking sound OF CONSUL ROMANUS; and immediately came &quot;sweeping by,&quot; in gorgeous paludaments, Paulus or Marius, girt round by a company of centurions, with the crimson tunic hoisted on a spear, and followed by the alalagmos of the Roman legions.</p><p>Many years ago, when I was looking over Piranesi&apos;s, Antiquities of Rome, Mr. Coleridge, who was standing by, described to me a set of plates by that artist, called his DREAMS, and which record the scenery of his own visions during the delirium of a fever. Some of them (I describe only from memory of Mr. Coleridge&apos;s account) represented vast Gothic halls, on the floor of which stood all sorts of engines and machinery, wheels, cables, pulleys, levers, catapults, &amp;c. &amp;c., expressive of enormous power put forth and resistance overcome. Creeping along the sides of the walls you perceived a staircase; and upon it, groping his way upwards, was Piranesi himself: follow the stairs a little further and you perceive it come to a sudden and abrupt termination without any balustrade, and allowing no step onwards to him who had reached the extremity except into the depths below. Whatever is to become of poor Piranesi, you suppose at least that his labours must in some way terminate here. But raise your eyes, and behold a second flight of stairs still higher, on which again Piranesi is perceived, but this time standing on the very brink of the abyss. Again elevate your eye, and a still more aerial flight of stairs is beheld, and again is poor Piranesi busy on his aspiring labours; and so on, until the unfinished stairs and Piranesi both are lost in the upper gloom of the hall. With the same power of endless growth and self- reproduction did my architecture proceed in dreams. In the early stage of my malady the splendours of my dreams were indeed chiefly architectural; and I beheld such pomp of cities and palaces as was never yet beheld by the waking eye unless in the clouds. From a great modern poet I cite part of a passage which describes, as an appearance actually beheld in the clouds, what in many of its circumstances I saw frequently in sleep:</p><p>The appearance, instantaneously disclosed, Was of a mighty city--boldly say A wilderness of building, sinking far And self-withdrawn into a wondrous depth, Far sinking into splendour--without end! Fabric it seem&apos;d of diamond, and of gold, With alabaster domes, and silver spires, And blazing terrace upon terrace, high Uplifted; here, serene pavilions bright In avenues disposed; there towers begirt With battlements that on their restless fronts Bore stars--illumination of all gems! By earthly nature had the effect been wrought Upon the dark materials of the storm Now pacified; on them, and on the coves, And mountain-steeps and summits, whereunto The vapours had receded,--taking there Their station under a cerulean sky. &amp;c. &amp;c.</p><p>The sublime circumstance, &quot;battlements that on their RESTLESS fronts bore stars,&quot; might have been copied from my architectural dreams, for it often occurred. We hear it reported of Dryden and of Fuseli, in modern times, that they thought proper to eat raw meat for the sake of obtaining splendid dreams: how much better for such a purpose to have eaten opium, which yet I do not remember that any poet is recorded to have done, except the dramatist Shadwell; and in ancient days Homer is I think rightly reputed to have known the virtues of opium.</p><p>To my architecture succeeded dreams of lakes and silvery expanses of water: these haunted me so much that I feared (though possibly it will appear ludicrous to a medical man) that some dropsical state or tendency of the brain might thus be making itself (to use a metaphysical word) OBJECTIVE; and the sentient organ PROJECT itself as its own object. For two months I suffered greatly in my head, a part of my bodily structure which had hitherto been so clear from all touch or taint of weakness (physically I mean) that I used to say of it, as the last Lord Orford said of his stomach, that it seemed likely to survive the rest of my person. Till now I had never felt a headache even, or any the slightest pain, except rheumatic pains caused by my own folly. However, I got over this attack, though it must have been verging on something very dangerous.</p><p>The waters now changed their character--from translucent lakes shining like mirrors they now became seas and oceans. And now came a tremendous change, which, unfolding itself slowly like a scroll through many months, promised an abiding torment; and in fact it never left me until the winding up of my case. Hitherto the human face had mixed often in my dreams, but not despotically nor with any special power of tormenting. But now that which I have called the tyranny of the human face began to unfold itself. Perhaps some part of my London life might be answerable for this. Be that as it may, now it was that upon the rocking waters of the ocean the human face began to appear; the sea appeared paved with innumerable faces upturned to the heavens--faces imploring, wrathful, despairing, surged upwards by thousands, by myriads, by generations, by centuries: my agitation was infinite; my mind tossed and surged with the ocean.</p><p>May 1818</p><p>The Malay has been a fearful enemy for months. I have been every night, through his means, transported into Asiatic scenes. I know not whether others share in my feelings on this point; but I have often thought that if I were compelled to forego England, and to live in China, and among Chinese manners and modes of life and scenery, I should go mad. The causes of my horror lie deep, and some of them must be common to others. Southern Asia in general is the seat of awful images and associations. As the cradle of the human race, it would alone have a dim and reverential feeling connected with it. But there are other reasons. No man can pretend that the wild, barbarous, and capricious superstitions of Africa, or of savage tribes elsewhere, affect him in the way that he is affected by the ancient, monumental, cruel, and elaborate religions of Indostan, &amp;c. The mere antiquity of Asiatic things, of their institutions, histories, modes of faith, &amp;c., is so impressive, that to me the vast age of the race and name overpowers the sense of youth in the individual. A young Chinese seems to me an antediluvian man renewed. Even Englishmen, though not bred in any knowledge of such institutions, cannot but shudder at the mystic sublimity of CASTES that have flowed apart, and refused to mix, through such immemorial tracts of time; nor can any man fail to be awed by the names of the Ganges or the Euphrates. It contributes much to these feelings that southern Asia is, and has been for thousands of years, the part of the earth most swarming with human life, the great officina gentium. Man is a weed in those regions. The vast empires also in which the enormous population of Asia has always been cast, give a further sublimity to the feelings associated with all Oriental names or images. In China, over and above what it has in common with the rest of southern Asia, I am terrified by the modes of life, by the manners, and the barrier of utter abhorrence and want of sympathy placed between us by feelings deeper than I can analyse. I could sooner live with lunatics or brute animals. All this, and much more than I can say or have time to say, the reader must enter into before he can comprehend the unimaginable horror which these dreams of Oriental imagery and mythological tortures impressed upon me. Under the connecting feeling of tropical heat and vertical sunlights I brought together all creatures, birds, beasts, reptiles, all trees and plants, usages and appearances, that are found in all tropical regions, and assembled them together in China or Indostan. From kindred feelings, I soon brought Egypt and all her gods under the same law. I was stared at, hooted at, grinned at, chattered at, by monkeys, by parroquets, by cockatoos. I ran into pagodas, and was fixed for centuries at the summit or in secret rooms: I was the idol; I was the priest; I was worshipped; I was sacrificed. I fled from the wrath of Brama through all the forests of Asia: Vishnu hated me: Seeva laid wait for me. I came suddenly upon Isis and Osiris: I had done a deed, they said, which the ibis and the crocodile trembled at. I was buried for a thousand years in stone coffins, with mummies and sphynxes, in narrow chambers at the heart of eternal pyramids. I was kissed, with cancerous kisses, by crocodiles; and laid, confounded with all unutterable slimy things, amongst reeds and Nilotic mud.</p><p>I thus give the reader some slight abstraction of my Oriental dreams, which always filled me with such amazement at the monstrous scenery that horror seemed absorbed for a while in sheer astonishment. Sooner or later came a reflux of feeling that swallowed up the astonishment, and left me not so much in terror as in hatred and abomination of what I saw. Over every form, and threat, and punishment, and dim sightless incarceration, brooded a sense of eternity and infinity that drove me into an oppression as of madness. Into these dreams only it was, with one or two slight exceptions, that any circumstances of physical horror entered. All before had been moral and spiritual terrors. But here the main agents were ugly birds, or snakes, or crocodiles; especially the last. The cursed crocodile became to me the object of more horror than almost all the rest. I was compelled to live with him, and (as was always the case almost in my dreams) for centuries. I escaped sometimes, and found myself in Chinese houses, with cane tables, &amp;c. All the feet of the tables, sofas, &amp;c., soon became instinct with life: the abominable head of the crocodile, and his leering eyes, looked out at me, multiplied into a thousand repetitions; and I stood loathing and fascinated. And so often did this hideous reptile haunt my dreams that many times the very same dream was broken up in the very same way: I heard gentle voices speaking to me (I hear everything when I am sleeping), and instantly I awoke. It was broad noon, and my children were standing, hand in hand, at my bedside--come to show me their coloured shoes, or new frocks, or to let me see them dressed for going out. I protest that so awful was the transition from the damned crocodile, and the other unutterable monsters and abortions of my dreams, to the sight of innocent HUMAN natures and of infancy, that in the mighty and sudden revulsion of mind I wept, and could not forbear it, as I kissed their faces.</p><p>June 1819</p><p>I have had occasion to remark, at various periods of my life, that the deaths of those whom we love, and indeed the contemplation of death generally, is (caeteris paribus) more affecting in summer than in any other season of the year. And the reasons are these three, I think: first, that the visible heavens in summer appear far higher, more distant, and (if such a solecism may be excused) more infinite; the clouds, by which chiefly the eye expounds the distance of the blue pavilion stretched over our heads, are in summer more voluminous, massed and accumulated in far grander and more towering piles. Secondly, the light and the appearances of the declining and the setting sun are much more fitted to be types and characters of the Infinite. And thirdly (which is the main reason), the exuberant and riotous prodigality of life naturally forces the mind more powerfully upon the antagonist thought of death, and the wintry sterility of the grave. For it may be observed generally, that wherever two thoughts stand related to each other by a law of antagonism, and exist, as it were, by mutual repulsion, they are apt to suggest each other. On these accounts it is that I find it impossible to banish the thought of death when I am walking alone in the endless days of summer; and any particular death, if not more affecting, at least haunts my mind more obstinately and besiegingly in that season. Perhaps this cause, and a slight incident which I omit, might have been the immediate occasions of the following dream, to which, however, a predisposition must always have existed in my mind; but having been once roused it never left me, and split into a thousand fantastic varieties, which often suddenly reunited, and composed again the original dream.</p><p>I thought that it was a Sunday morning in May, that it was Easter Sunday, and as yet very early in the morning. I was standing, as it seemed to me, at the door of my own cottage. Right before me lay the very scene which could really be commanded from that situation, but exalted, as was usual, and solemnised by the power of dreams. There were the same mountains, and the same lovely valley at their feet; but the mountains were raised to more than Alpine height, and there was interspace far larger between them of meadows and forest lawns; the hedges were rich with white roses; and no living creature was to be seen, excepting that in the green churchyard there were cattle tranquilly reposing upon the verdant graves, and particularly round about the grave of a child whom I had tenderly loved, just as I had really beheld them, a little before sunrise in the same summer, when that child died. I gazed upon the well-known scene, and I said aloud (as I thought) to myself, &quot;It yet wants much of sunrise, and it is Easter Sunday; and that is the day on which they celebrate the first fruits of resurrection. I will walk abroad; old griefs shall be forgotten to-day; for the air is cool and still, and the hills are high and stretch away to heaven; and the forest glades are as quiet as the churchyard, and with the dew I can wash the fever from my forehead, and then I shall be unhappy no longer.&quot; And I turned as if to open my garden gate, and immediately I saw upon the left a scene far different, but which yet the power of dreams had reconciled into harmony with the other. The scene was an Oriental one, and there also it was Easter Sunday, and very early in the morning. And at a vast distance were visible, as a stain upon the horizon, the domes and cupolas of a great city--an image or faint abstraction, caught perhaps in childhood from some picture of Jerusalem. And not a bow-shot from me, upon a stone and shaded by Judean palms, there sat a woman, and I looked, and it was--Ann! She fixed her eyes upon me earnestly, and I said to her at length: &quot;So, then, I have found you at last.&quot; I waited, but she answered me not a word. Her face was the same as when I saw it last, and yet again how different! Seventeen years ago, when the lamp-light fell upon her face, as for the last time I kissed her lips (lips, Ann, that to me were not polluted), her eyes were streaming with tears: the tears were now wiped away; she seemed more beautiful than she was at that time, but in all other points the same, and not older. Her looks were tranquil, but with unusual solemnity of expression, and I now gazed upon her with some awe; but suddenly her countenance grew dim, and turning to the mountains I perceived vapours rolling between us. In a moment all had vanished, thick darkness came on, and in the twinkling of an eye I was far away from mountains, and by lamplight in Oxford Street, walking again with Ann--just as we walked seventeen years before, when we were both children.</p><p>As a final specimen, I cite one of a different character, from 1820.</p><p>The dream commenced with a music which now I often heard in dreams-- a music of preparation and of awakening suspense, a music like the opening of the Coronation Anthem, and which, like THAT, gave the feeling of a vast march, of infinite cavalcades filing off, and the tread of innumerable armies. The morning was come of a mighty day-- a day of crisis and of final hope for human nature, then suffering some mysterious eclipse, and labouring in some dread extremity. Somewhere, I knew not where--somehow, I knew not how--by some beings, I knew not whom--a battle, a strife, an agony, was conducting, was evolving like a great drama or piece of music, with which my sympathy was the more insupportable from my confusion as to its place, its cause, its nature, and its possible issue. I, as is usual in dreams (where of necessity we make ourselves central to every movement), had the power, and yet had not the power, to decide it. I had the power, if I could raise myself to will it, and yet again had not the power, for the weight of twenty Atlantics was upon me, or the oppression of inexpiable guilt. &quot;Deeper than ever plummet sounded,&quot; I lay inactive. Then like a chorus the passion deepened. Some greater interest was at stake, some mightier cause than ever yet the sword had pleaded, or trumpet had proclaimed. Then came sudden alarms, hurryings to and fro, trepidations of innumerable fugitives--I knew not whether from the good cause or the bad, darkness and lights, tempest and human faces, and at last, with the sense that all was lost, female forms, and the features that were worth all the world to me, and but a moment allowed--and clasped hands, and heart-breaking partings, and then--everlasting farewells! And with a sigh, such as the caves of Hell sighed when the incestuous mother uttered the abhorred name of death, the sound was reverberated--everlasting farewells! And again and yet again reverberated--everlasting farewells!</p><p>And I awoke in struggles, and cried aloud--&quot;I will sleep no more.&quot;</p><p>But I am now called upon to wind up a narrative which has already extended to an unreasonable length. Within more spacious limits the materials which I have used might have been better unfolded, and much which I have not used might have been added with effect. Perhaps, however, enough has been given. It now remains that I should say something of the way in which this conflict of horrors was finally brought to a crisis. The reader is already aware (from a passage near the beginning of the introduction to the first part) that the Opium-eater has, in some way or other, &quot;unwound almost to its final links the accursed chain which bound him.&quot; By what means? To have narrated this according to the original intention would have far exceeded the space which can now be allowed. It is fortunate, as such a cogent reason exists for abridging it, that I should, on a maturer view of the case, have been exceedingly unwilling to injure, by any such unaffecting details, the impression of the history itself, as an appeal to the prudence and the conscience of the yet unconfirmed opium-eater--or even (though a very inferior consideration) to injure its effect as a composition. The interest of the judicious reader will not attach itself chiefly to the subject of the fascinating spells, but to the fascinating power. Not the Opium-eater, but the opium, is the true hero of the tale, and the legitimate centre on which the interest revolves. The object was to display the marvellous agency of opium, whether for pleasure or for pain: if that is done, the action of the piece has closed.</p><p>However, as some people, in spite of all laws to the contrary, will persist in asking what became of the Opium-eater, and in what state he now is, I answer for him thus: The reader is aware that opium had long ceased to found its empire on spells of pleasure; it was solely by the tortures connected with the attempt to abjure it that it kept its hold. Yet, as other tortures, no less it may be thought, attended the non-abjuration of such a tyrant, a choice only of evils was left; and THAT might as well have been adopted which, however terrific in itself, held out a prospect of final restoration to happiness. This appears true; but good logic gave the author no strength to act upon it. However, a crisis arrived for the author&apos;s life, and a crisis for other objects still dearer to him--and which will always be far dearer to him than his life, even now that it is again a happy one. I saw that I must die if I continued the opium. I determined, therefore, if that should be required, to die in throwing it off. How much I was at that time taking I cannot say, for the opium which I used had been purchased for me by a friend, who afterwards refused to let me pay him; so that I could not ascertain even what quantity I had used within the year. I apprehend, however, that I took it very irregularly, and that I varied from about fifty or sixty grains to 150 a day. My first task was to reduce it to forty, to thirty, and as fast as I could to twelve grains.</p><p>I triumphed. But think not, reader, that therefore my sufferings were ended, nor think of me as of one sitting in a DEJECTED state. Think of me as one, even when four months had passed, still agitated, writhing, throbbing, palpitating, shattered, and much perhaps in the situation of him who has been racked, as I collect the torments of that state from the affecting account of them left by a most innocent sufferer {20} of the times of James I. Meantime, I derived no benefit from any medicine, except one prescribed to me by an Edinburgh surgeon of great eminence, viz., ammoniated tincture of valerian. Medical account, therefore, of my emancipation I have not much to give, and even that little, as managed by a man so ignorant of medicine as myself, would probably tend only to mislead. At all events, it would be misplaced in this situation. The moral of the narrative is addressed to the opium-eater, and therefore of necessity limited in its application. If he is taught to fear and tremble, enough has been effected. But he may say that the issue of my case is at least a proof that opium, after a seventeen years&apos; use and an eight years&apos; abuse of its powers, may still be renounced, and that HE may chance to bring to the task greater energy than I did, or that with a stronger constitution than mine he may obtain the same results with less. This may be true. I would not presume to measure the efforts of other men by my own. I heartily wish him more energy. I wish him the same success. Nevertheless, I had motives external to myself which he may unfortunately want, and these supplied me with conscientious supports which mere personal interests might fail to supply to a mind debilitated by opium.</p><p>Jeremy Taylor conjectures that it may be as painful to be born as to die. I think it probable; and during the whole period of diminishing the opium I had the torments of a man passing out of one mode of existence into another. The issue was not death, but a sort of physical regeneration; and I may add that ever since, at intervals, I have had a restoration of more than youthful spirits, though under the pressure of difficulties which in a less happy state of mind I should have called misfortunes.</p><p>One memorial of my former condition still remains--my dreams are not yet perfectly calm; the dread swell and agitation of the storm have not wholly subsided; the legions that encamped in them are drawing off, but not all departed; my sleep is still tumultuous, and, like the gates of Paradise to our first parents when looking back from afar, it is still (in the tremendous line of Milton)</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
Meantime, what had become of poor Ann?]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/meantime-what-had-become-of-poor-ann</link>
            <guid>CidS3suhMz01wAKjOawM</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 14:05:48 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[According to our agreement, I sought her daily, and waited for her every night, so long as I stayed in London, at the corner of Titchfield Street. I inquired for her of every one who was likely to know her, and during the last hours of my stay in London I put into activity every means of tracing her that my knowledge of London suggested and the limited extent of my power made possible. The street where she had lodged I knew, but not the house; and I remembered at last some account which she h...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to our agreement, I sought her daily, and waited for her every night, so long as I stayed in London, at the corner of Titchfield Street. I inquired for her of every one who was likely to know her, and during the last hours of my stay in London I put into activity every means of tracing her that my knowledge of London suggested and the limited extent of my power made possible. The street where she had lodged I knew, but not the house; and I remembered at last some account which she had given me of ill-treatment from her landlord, which made it probable that she had quitted those lodgings before we parted. She had few acquaintances; most people, besides, thought that the earnestness of my inquiries arose from motives which moved their laughter or their slight regard; and others, thinking I was in chase of a girl who had robbed me of some trifles, were naturally and excusably indisposed to give me any clue to her, if indeed they had any to give. Finally as my despairing resource, on the day I left London I put into the hands of the only person who (I was sure) must know Ann by sight, from having been in company with us once or twice, an address to -, in -shire, at that time the residence of my family. But to this hour I have never heard a syllable about her. This, amongst such troubles as most men meet with in this life, has been my heaviest affliction. If she lived, doubtless we must have been some time in search of each other, at the very same moment, through the mighty labyrinths of London; perhaps even within a few feet of each other-- a barrier no wider than a London street often amounting in the end to a separation for eternity! During some years I hoped that she DID live; and I suppose that, in the literal and unrhetorical use of the word MYRIAD, I may say that on my different visits to London I have looked into many, many myriads of female faces, in the hope of meeting her. I should know her again amongst a thousand, if I saw her for a moment; for though not handsome, she had a sweet expression of countenance and a peculiar and graceful carriage of the head. I sought her, I have said, in hope. So it was for years; but now I should fear to see her; and her cough, which grieved me when I parted with her, is now my consolation. I now wish to see her no longer; but think of her, more gladly, as one long since laid in the grave--in the grave, I would hope, of a Magdalen; taken away, before injuries and cruelty had blotted out and transfigured her ingenuous nature, or the brutalities of ruffians had completed the ruin they had begun.</p><p>[The remainder of this very interesting article will be given in the next number.--ED.]</p><p>PART II</p><p>From the London Magazine for October 1821.</p><p>So then, Oxford Street, stony-hearted step-mother! thou that listenest to the sighs of orphans and drinkest the tears of children, at length I was dismissed from thee; the time was come at last that I no more should pace in anguish thy never-ending terraces, no more should dream and wake in captivity to the pangs of hunger. Successors too many, to myself and Ann, have doubtless since then trodden in our footsteps, inheritors of our calamities; other orphans than Ann have sighed; tears have been shed by other children; and thou, Oxford Street, hast since doubtless echoed to the groans of innumerable hearts. For myself, however, the storm which I had outlived seemed to have been the pledge of a long fair- weather--the premature sufferings which I had paid down to have been accepted as a ransom for many years to come, as a price of long immunity from sorrow; and if again I walked in London a solitary and contemplative man (as oftentimes I did), I walked for the most part in serenity and peace of mind. And although it is true that the calamities of my noviciate in London had struck root so deeply in my bodily constitution, that afterwards they shot up and flourished afresh, and grew into a noxious umbrage that has overshadowed and darkened my latter years, yet these second assaults of suffering were met with a fortitude more confirmed, with the resources of a maturer intellect, and with alleviations from sympathising affection--how deep and tender!</p><p>Thus, however, with whatsoever alleviations, years that were far asunder were bound together by subtle links of suffering derived from a common root. And herein I notice an instance of the short- sightedness of human desires, that oftentimes on moonlight nights, during my first mournful abode in London, my consolation was (if such it could be thought) to gaze from Oxford Street up every avenue in succession which pierces through the heart of Marylebone to the fields and the woods; for THAT, said I, travelling with my eyes up the long vistas which lay part in light and part in shade, &quot;THAT is the road to the North, and therefore to, and if I had the wings of a dove, THAT way I would fly for comfort.&quot; Thus I said, and thus I wished, in my blindness. Yet even in that very northern region it was, even in that very valley, nay, in that very house to which my erroneous wishes pointed, that this second birth of my sufferings began, and that they again threatened to besiege the citadel of life and hope. There it was that for years I was persecuted by visions as ugly, and as ghastly phantoms as ever haunted the couch of an Orestes; and in this unhappier than he, that sleep, which comes to all as a respite and a restoration, and to him especially as a blessed {7} balm for his wounded heart and his haunted brain, visited me as my bitterest scourge. Thus blind was I in my desires; yet if a veil interposes between the dim-sightedness of man and his future calamities, the same veil hides from him their alleviations, and a grief which had not been feared is met by consolations which had not been hoped. I therefore, who participated, as it were, in the troubles of Orestes (excepting only in his agitated conscience), participated no less in all his supports. My Eumenides, like his, were at my bed-feet, and stared in upon me through the curtains; but watching by my pillow, or defrauding herself of sleep to bear me company through the heavy watches of the night, sate my Electra; for thou, beloved M., dear companion of my later years, thou wast my Electra! and neither in nobility of mind nor in long-suffering affection wouldst permit that a Grecian sister should excel an English wife. For thou thoughtest not much to stoop to humble offices of kindness and to servile {8} ministrations of tenderest affection--to wipe away for years the unwholesome dews upon the forehead, or to refresh the lips when parched and baked with fever; nor even when thy own peaceful slumbers had by long sympathy become infected with the spectacle of my dread contest with phantoms and shadowy enemies that oftentimes bade me &quot;sleep no more!&quot;--not even then didst thou utter a complaint or any murmur, nor withdraw thy angelic smiles, nor shrink from thy service of love, more than Electra did of old. For she too, though she was a Grecian woman, and the daughter of the king {9} of men, yet wept sometimes, and hid her face {10} in her robe.</p><p>But these troubles are past; and thou wilt read records of a period so dolorous to us both as the legend of some hideous dream that can return no more. Meantime, I am again in London, and again I pace the terraces of Oxford Street by night; and oftentimes, when I am oppressed by anxieties that demand all my philosophy and the comfort of thy presence to support, and yet remember that I am separated from thee by three hundred miles and the length of three dreary months, I look up the streets that run northwards from Oxford Street, upon moon-light nights, and recollect my youthful ejaculation of anguish; and remembering that thou art sitting alone in that same valley, and mistress of that very house to which my heart turned in its blindness nineteen years ago, I think that, though blind indeed, and scattered to the winds of late, the promptings of my heart may yet have had reference to a remoter time, and may be justified if read in another meaning; and if I could allow myself to descend again to the impotent wishes of childhood, I should again say to myself, as I look to the North, &quot;Oh, that I had the wings of a dove--&quot; and with how just a confidence in thy good and gracious nature might I add the other half of my early ejaculation--&quot;And THAT way I would fly for comfort!&quot;</p><p>THE PLEASURES OF OPIUM</p><p>It is so long since I first took opium that if it had been a trifling incident in my life I might have forgotten its date; but cardinal events are not to be forgotten, and from circumstances connected with it I remember that it must be referred to the autumn of 1804. During that season I was in London, having come thither for the first time since my entrance at college. And my introduction to opium arose in the following way. From an early age I had been accustomed to wash my head in cold water at least once a day: being suddenly seized with toothache, I attributed it to some relaxation caused by an accidental intermission of that practice, jumped out of bed, plunged my head into a basin of cold water, and with hair thus wetted went to sleep. The next morning, as I need hardly say, I awoke with excruciating rheumatic pains of the head and face, from which I had hardly any respite for about twenty days. On the twenty-first day I think it was, and on a Sunday, that I went out into the streets, rather to run away, if possible, from my torments, than with any distinct purpose. By accident I met a college acquaintance, who recommended opium. Opium! dread agent of unimaginable pleasure and pain! I had heard of it as I had of manna or of ambrosia, but no further. How unmeaning a sound was it at that time: what solemn chords does it now strike upon my heart! what heart-quaking vibrations of sad and happy remembrances! Reverting for a moment to these, I feel a mystic importance attached to the minutest circumstances connected with the place and the time and the man (if man he was) that first laid open to me the Paradise of Opium-eaters. It was a Sunday afternoon, wet and cheerless: and a duller spectacle this earth of ours has not to show than a rainy Sunday in London. My road homewards lay through Oxford Street; and near &quot;the stately Pantheon&quot; (as Mr. Wordsworth has obligingly called it) I saw a druggist&apos;s shop. The druggist--unconscious minister of celestial pleasures!--as if in sympathy with the rainy Sunday, looked dull and stupid, just as any mortal druggist might be expected to look on a Sunday; and when I asked for the tincture of opium, he gave it to me as any other man might do, and furthermore, out of my shilling returned me what seemed to be real copper halfpence, taken out of a real wooden drawer. Nevertheless, in spite of such indications of humanity, he has ever since existed in my mind as the beatific vision of an immortal druggist, sent down to earth on a special mission to myself. And it confirms me in this way of considering him, that when I next came up to London I sought him near the stately Pantheon, and found him not; and thus to me, who knew not his name (if indeed he had one), he seemed rather to have vanished from Oxford Street than to have removed in any bodily fashion. The reader may choose to think of him as possibly no more than a sublunary druggist; it may be so, but my faith is better--I believe him to have evanesced, {11} or evaporated. So unwillingly would I connect any mortal remembrances with that hour, and place, and creature, that first brought me acquainted with the celestial drug.</p><p>Arrived at my lodgings, it may be supposed that I lost not a moment in taking the quantity prescribed. I was necessarily ignorant of the whole art and mystery of opium-taking, and what I took I took under every disadvantage. But I took it--and in an hour--oh, heavens! what a revulsion! what an upheaving, from its lowest depths, of inner spirit! what an apocalypse of the world within me! That my pains had vanished was now a trifle in my eyes: this negative effect wasswallowed up in the immensity of those positive effects which had opened before me--in the abyss of divine enjoyment thus suddenly revealed. Here was a panacea, a [Greek text] for all human woes; here was the secret of happiness, about which philosophers had disputed for so many ages, at once discovered: happiness might now be bought for a penny, and carried in the waistcoat pocket; portable ecstacies might be had corked up in a pint bottle, and peace of mind could be sent down in gallons by the mail-coach. But if I talk in this way the reader will think I am laughing, and I can assure him that nobody will laugh long who deals much with opium: its pleasures even are of a grave and solemn complexion, and in his happiest state the opium-eater cannot present himself in the character of L&apos;Allegro: even then he speaks and thinks as becomes Il Penseroso. Nevertheless, I have a very reprehensible way of jesting at times in the midst of my own misery; and unless when I am checked by some more powerful feelings, I am afraid I shall be guilty of this indecent practice even in these annals of suffering or enjoyment. The reader must allow a little to my infirm nature in this respect; and with a few indulgences of that sort I shall endeavour to be as grave, if not drowsy, as fits a theme like opium, so anti-mercurial as it really is, and so drowsy as it is falsely reputed.</p><p>And first, one word with respect to its bodily effects; for upon all that has been hitherto written on the subject of opium, whether by travellers in Turkey (who may plead their privilege of lying as an old immemorial right), or by professors of medicine, writing ex cathedra, I have but one emphatic criticism to pronounce--Lies! lies! lies! I remember once, in passing a book-stall, to have caught these words from a page of some satiric author: &quot;By this time I became convinced that the London newspapers spoke truth at least twice a week, viz., on Tuesday and Saturday, and might safely be depended upon for--the list of bankrupts.&quot; In like manner, I do by no means deny that some truths have been delivered to the world in regard to opium. Thus it has been repeatedly affirmed by the learned that opium is a dusky brown in colour; and this, take notice, I grant. Secondly, that it is rather dear, which also I grant, for in my time East Indian opium has been three guineas a pound, and Turkey eight. And thirdly, that if you eat a good deal of it, most probably you must--do what is particularly disagreeable to any man of regular habits, viz., die. {12} These weighty propositions are, all and singular, true: I cannot gainsay them, and truth ever was, and will be, commendable. But in these three theorems I believe we have exhausted the stock of knowledge as yet accumulated by men on the subject of opium.</p><p>And therefore, worthy doctors, as there seems to be room for further discoveries, stand aside, and allow me to come forward and lecture on this matter.</p><p>First, then, it is not so much affirmed as taken for granted, by all who ever mention opium, formally or incidentally, that it does or can produce intoxication. Now, reader, assure yourself, meo perieulo, that no quantity of opium ever did or could intoxicate. As to the tincture of opium (commonly called laudanum) THAT might certainly intoxicate if a man could bear to take enough of it; but why? Because it contains so much proof spirit, and not because it contains so much opium. But crude opium, I affirm peremptorily, is incapable of producing any state of body at all resembling that which is produced by alcohol, and not in DEGREE only incapable, but even in KIND: it is not in the quantity of its effects merely, but in the quality, that it differs altogether. The pleasure given by wine is always mounting and tending to a crisis, after which it declines; that from opium, when once generated, is stationary for eight or ten hours: the first, to borrow a technical distinction from medicine, is a case of acute--the second, the chronic pleasure; the one is a flame, the other a steady and equable glow. But the main distinction lies in this, that whereas wine disorders the mental faculties, opium, on the contrary (if taken in a proper manner), introduces amongst them the most exquisite order, legislation, and harmony. Wine robs a man of his self-possession; opium greatly invigorates it. Wine unsettles and clouds the judgement, and gives a preternatural brightness and a vivid exaltation to the contempts and the admirations, the loves and the hatreds of the drinker; opium, on the contrary, communicates serenity and equipoise to all the faculties, active or passive, and with respect to the temper and moral feelings in general it gives simply that sort of vital warmth which is approved by the judgment, and which would probably always accompany a bodily constitution of primeval or antediluvian health. Thus, for instance, opium, like wine, gives an expansion to the heart and the benevolent affections; but then, with this remarkable difference, that in the sudden development of kind-heartedness which accompanies inebriation there is always more or less of a maudlin character, which exposes it to the contempt of the bystander. Men shake hands, swear eternal friendship, and shed tears, no mortal knows why; and the sensual creature is clearly uppermost. But the expansion of the benigner feelings incident to opium is no febrile access, but a healthy restoration to that state which the mind would naturally recover upon the removal of any deep-seated irritation of pain that had disturbed and quarrelled with the impulses of a heart originally just and good. True it is that even wine, up to a certain point and with certain men, rather tends to exalt and to steady the intellect; I myself, who have never been a great wine-drinker, used to find that half-a-dozen glasses of wine advantageously affected the faculties--brightened and intensified the consciousness, and gave to the mind a feeling of being &quot;ponderibus librata suis;&quot; and certainly it is most absurdly said, in popular language, of any man that he is DISGUISED in liquor; for, on the contrary, most men are disguised by sobriety, and it is when they are drinking (as some old gentleman says in Athenaeus), that men [Greek text]--display themselves in their true complexion of character, which surely is not disguising themselves. But still, wine constantly leads a man to the brink of absurdity and extravagance, and beyond a certain point it is sure to volatilise and to disperse the intellectual energies: whereas opium always seems to compose what had been agitated, and to concentrate what had been distracted. In short, to sum up all in one word, a man who is inebriated, or tending to inebriation, is, and feels that he is, in a condition which calls up into supremacy the merely human, too often the brutal part of his nature; but the opium-eater (I speak of him who is not suffering from any disease or other remote effects of opium) feels that the divines part of his nature is paramount; that is, the moral affections are in a state of cloudless serenity, and over all is the great light of the majestic intellect.</p><p>This is the doctrine of the true church on the subject of opium: of which church I acknowledge myself to be the only member--the alpha and the omega: but then it is to be recollected that I speak from the ground of a large and profound personal experience: whereas most of the unscientific {13} authors who have at all treated of opium, and even of those who have written expressly on the materia medica, make it evident, from the horror they express of it, that their experimental knowledge of its action is none at all. I will, however, candidly acknowledge that I have met with one person who bore evidence to its intoxicating power, such as staggered my own incredulity; for he was a surgeon, and had himself taken opium largely. I happened to say to him that his enemies (as I had heard) charged him with talking nonsense on politics, and that his friends apologized for him by suggesting that he was constantly in a state of intoxication from opium. Now the accusation, said I, is not prima facie and of necessity an absurd one; but the defence IS. To my surprise, however, he insisted that both his enemies and his friends were in the right. &quot;I will maintain,&quot; said he, &quot;that I DO talk nonsense; and secondly, I will maintain that I do not talk nonsense upon principle, or with any view to profit, but solely and simply, said he, solely and simply--solely and simply (repeating it three times over), because I am drunk with opium, and THAT daily.&quot; I replied that, as to the allegation of his enemies, as it seemed to be established upon such respectable testimony, seeing that the three parties concerned all agree in it, it did not become me to question it; but the defence set up I must demur to. He proceeded to discuss the matter, and to lay down his reasons; but it seemed to me so impolite to pursue an argument which must have presumed a man mistaken in a point belonging to his own profession, that I did not press him even when his course of argument seemed open to objection; not to mention that a man who talks nonsense, even though &quot;with no view to profit,&quot; is not altogether the most agreeable partner in a dispute, whether as opponent or respondent. I confess, however, that the authority of a surgeon, and one who was reputed a good one, may seem a weighty one to my prejudice; but still I must plead my experience, which was greater than his greatest by 7,000 drops a- day; and though it was not possible to suppose a medical man unacquainted with the characteristic symptoms of vinous intoxication, it yet struck me that he might proceed on a logical error of using the word intoxication with too great latitude, and extending it generically to all modes of nervous excitement, instead of restricting it as the expression for a specific sort of excitement connected with certain diagnostics. Some people have maintained in my hearing that they had been drunk upon green tea; and a medical student in London, for whose knowledge in his profession I have reason to feel great respect, assured me the other day that a patient in recovering from an illness had got drunk on a beef-steak.</p><p>Having dwelt so much on this first and leading error in respect to opium, I shall notice very briefly a second and a third, which are, that the elevation of spirits produced by opium is necessarily followed by a proportionate depression, and that the natural and even immediate consequence of opium is torpor and stagnation, animal and mental. The first of these errors I shall content myself with simply denying; assuring my reader that for ten years, during which I took opium at intervals, the day succeeding to that on which I allowed myself this luxury was always a day of unusually good spirits.</p><p>With respect to the torpor supposed to follow, or rather (if we were to credit the numerous pictures of Turkish opium-eaters) to accompany the practice of opium-eating, I deny that also. Certainly opium is classed under the head of narcotics, and some such effect it may produce in the end; but the primary effects of opium are always, and in the highest degree, to excite and stimulate the system. This first stage of its action always lasted with me, during my noviciate, for upwards of eight hours; so that it must be the fault of the opium-eater himself if he does not so time his exhibition of the dose (to speak medically) as that the whole weight of its narcotic influence may descend upon his sleep. Turkish opium-eaters, it seems, are absurd enough to sit, like so many equestrian statues, on logs of wood as stupid as themselves. But that the reader may judge of the degree in which opium is likely to stupefy the faculties of an Englishman, I shall (by way of treating the question illustratively, rather than argumentatively) describe the way in which I myself often passed an opium evening in London during the period between 1804-1812. It will be seen that at least opium did not move me to seek solitude, and much less to seek inactivity, or the torpid state of self-involution ascribed to the Turks. I give this account at the risk of being pronounced a crazy enthusiast or visionary; but I regard THAT little. I must desire my reader to bear in mind that I was a hard student, and at severe studies for all the rest of my time; and certainly I had a right occasionally to relaxations as well as other people. These, however, I allowed myself but seldom.</p><p>The late Duke of--used to say, &quot;Next Friday, by the blessing of heaven, I purpose to be drunk;&quot; and in like manner I used to fix beforehand how often within a given time, and when, I would commit a debauch of opium. This was seldom more than once in three weeks, for at that time I could not have ventured to call every day, as I did afterwards, for &quot;A GLASS OF LAUDANUM NEGUS, WARM, AND WITHOUT SUGAR.&quot; No, as I have said, I seldom drank laudanum, at that time, more than once in three weeks: This was usually on a Tuesday or a Saturday night; my reason for which was this. In those days Grassini sang at the Opera, and her voice was delightful to me beyond all that I had ever heard. I know not what may be the state of the Opera-house now, having never been within its walls for seven or eight years, but at that time it was by much the most pleasant place of public resort in London for passing an evening. Five shillings admitted one to the gallery, which was subject to far less annoyance than the pit of the theatres; the orchestra was distinguished by its sweet and melodious grandeur from all English orchestras, the composition of which, I confess, is not acceptable to my ear, from the predominance of the clamorous instruments and the absolute tyranny of the violin. The choruses were divine to hear, and when Grassini appeared in some interlude, as she often did, and poured forth her passionate soul as Andromache at the tomb of Hector, &amp;c., I question whether any Turk, of all that ever entered the Paradise of Opium-eaters, can have had half the pleasure I had. But, indeed, I honour the barbarians too much by supposing them capable of any pleasures approaching to the intellectual ones of an Englishman. For music is an intellectual or a sensual pleasure according to the temperament of him who hears it. And, by- the-bye, with the exception of the fine extravaganza on that subject in &quot;Twelfth Night,&quot; I do not recollect more than one thing said adequately on the subject of music in all literature; it is a passage in the Religio Medici {14} of Sir T. Brown, and though chiefly remarkable for its sublimity, has also a philosophic value, inasmuch as it points to the true theory of musical effects. The mistake of most people is to suppose that it is by the ear they communicate with music, and therefore that they are purely passive to its effects. But this is not so; it is by the reaction of the mind upon the notices of the ear (the MATTER coming by the senses, the FORM from the mind) that the pleasure is constructed, and therefore it is that people of equally good ear differ so much in this point from one another. Now, opium, by greatly increasing the activity of the mind, generally increases, of necessity, that particular mode of its activity by which we are able to construct out of the raw material of organic sound an elaborate intellectual pleasure. But, says a friend, a succession of musical sounds is to me like a collection of Arabic characters; I can attach no ideas to them. Ideas! my good sir? There is no occasion for them; all that class of ideas which can be available in such a case has a language of representative feelings. But this is a subject foreign to my present purposes; it is sufficient to say that a chorus, &amp;c., of elaborate harmony displayed before me, as in a piece of arras work, the whole of my past life--not as if recalled by an act of memory, but as if present and incarnated in the music; no longer painful to dwell upon; but the detail of its incidents removed or blended in some hazy abstraction, and its passions exalted, spiritualized, and sublimed. All this was to be had for five shillings. And over and above the music of the stage and the orchestra, I had all around me, in the intervals of the performance, the music of the Italian language talked by Italian women--for the gallery was usually crowded with Italians--and I listened with a pleasure such as that with which Weld the traveller lay and listened, in Canada, to the sweet laughter of Indian women; for the less you understand of a language, the more sensible you are to the melody or harshness of its sounds. For such a purpose, therefore, it was an advantage to me that I was a poor Italian scholar, reading it but little, and not speaking it at all, nor understanding a tenth part of what I heard spoken.</p><p>These were my opera pleasures; but another pleasure I had which, as it could be had only on a Saturday night, occasionally struggled with my love of the Opera; for at that time Tuesday and Saturday were the regular opera nights. On this subject I am afraid I shall be rather obscure, but I can assure the reader not at all more so than Marinus in his Life of Proclus, or many other biographers and autobiographers of fair reputation. This pleasure, I have said, was to be had only on a Saturday night. What, then, was Saturday night to me more than any other night? I had no labours that I rested from, no wages to receive; what needed I to care for Saturday night, more than as it was a summons to hear Grassini? True, most logical reader; what you say is unanswerable. And yet so it was and is, that whereas different men throw their feelings into different channels, and most are apt to show their interest in the concerns of the poor chiefly by sympathy, expressed in some shape or other, with their distresses and sorrows, I at that time was disposed to express my interest by sympathising with their pleasures. The pains of poverty I had lately seen too much of, more than I wished to remember; but the pleasures of the poor, their consolations of spirit, and their reposes from bodily toil, can never become oppressive to contemplate. Now Saturday night is the season for the chief, regular, and periodic return of rest of the poor; in this point the most hostile sects unite, and acknowledge a common link of brotherhood; almost all Christendom rests from its labours. It is a rest introductory to another rest, and divided by a whole day and two nights from the renewal of toil. On this account I feel always, on a Saturday night, as though I also were released from some yoke of labour, had some wages to receive, and some luxury of repose to enjoy. For the sake, therefore, of witnessing, upon as large a scale as possible, a spectacle with which my sympathy was so entire, I used often on Saturday nights, after I had taken opium, to wander forth, without much regarding the direction or the distance, to all the markets and other parts of London to which the poor resort of a Saturday night, for laying out their wages. Many a family party, consisting of a man, his wife, and sometimes one or two of his children, have I listened to, as they stood consulting on their ways and means, or the strength of their exchequer, or the price of household articles. Gradually I became familiar with their wishes, their difficulties, and their opinions. Sometimes there might be heard murmurs of discontent, but far oftener expressions on the countenance, or uttered in words, of patience, hope, and tranquillity. And taken generally, I must say that, in this point at least, the poor are more philosophic than the rich--that they show a more ready and cheerful submission to what they consider as irremediable evils or irreparable losses. Whenever I saw occasion, or could do it without appearing to be intrusive, I joined their parties, and gave my opinion upon the matter in discussion, which, if not always judicious, was always received indulgently. If wages were a little higher or expected to be so, or the quartern loaf a little lower, or it was reported that onions and butter were expected to fall, I was glad; yet, if the contrary were true, I drew from opium some means of consoling myself. For opium (like the bee, that extracts its materials indiscriminately from roses and from the soot of chimneys) can overrule all feelings into compliance with the master-key. Some of these rambles led me to great distances, for an opium-eater is too happy to observe the motion of time; and sometimes in my attempts to steer homewards, upon nautical principles, by fixing my eye on the pole-star, and seeking ambitiously for a north-west passage, instead of circumnavigating all the capes and head-lands I had doubled in my outward voyage, I came suddenly upon such knotty problems of alleys, such enigmatical entries, and such sphynx&apos;s riddles of streets without thoroughfares, as must, I conceive, baffle the audacity of porters and confound the intellects of hackney-coachmen. I could almost have believed at times that I must be the first discoverer of some of these terrae incognitae, and doubted whether they had yet been laid down in the modern charts of London. For all this, however, I paid a heavy price in distant years, when the human face tyrannised over my dreams, and the perplexities of my steps in London came back and haunted my sleep, with the feeling of perplexities, moral and intellectual, that brought confusion to the reason, or anguish and remorse to the conscience.</p><p>Thus I have shown that opium does not of necessity produce inactivity or torpor, but that, on the contrary, it often led me into markets and theatres. Yet, in candour, I will admit that markets and theatres are not the appropriate haunts of the opium- eater when in the divinest state incident to his enjoyment. In that state, crowds become an oppression to him; music even, too sensual and gross. He naturally seeks solitude and silence, as indispensable conditions of those trances, or profoundest reveries, which are the crown and consummation of what opium can do for human nature. I, whose disease it was to meditate too much and to observe too little, and who upon my first entrance at college was nearly falling into a deep melancholy, from brooding too much on the sufferings which I had witnessed in London, was sufficiently aware of the tendencies of my own thoughts to do all I could to counteract them. I was, indeed, like a person who, according to the old legend, had entered the cave of Trophonius; and the remedies I sought were to force myself into society, and to keep my understanding in continual activity upon matters of science. But for these remedies I should certainly have become hypochondriacally melancholy. In after years, however, when my cheerfulness was more fully re-established, I yielded to my natural inclination for a solitary life. And at that time I often fell into these reveries upon taking opium; and more than once it has happened to me, on a summer night, when I have been at an open window, in a room from which I could overlook the sea at a mile below me, and could command a view of the great town of L-, at about the same distance, that I have sate from sunset to sunrise, motionless, and without wishing to move.</p><p>I shall be charged with mysticism, Behmenism, quietism, &amp;c., but THAT shall not alarm me. Sir H. Vane, the younger, was one of our wisest men; and let my reader see if he, in his philosophical works, be half as unmystical as I am. I say, then, that it has often struck me that the scene itself was somewhat typical of what took place in such a reverie. The town of L- represented the earth, with its sorrows and its graves left behind, yet not out of sight, nor wholly forgotten. The ocean, in everlasting but gentle agitation, and brooded over by a dove-like calm, might not unfitly typify the mind and the mood which then swayed it. For it seemed to me as if then first I stood at a distance and aloof from the uproar of life; as if the tumult, the fever, and the strife were suspended; a respite granted from the secret burthens of the heart; a sabbath of repose; a resting from human labours. Here were the hopes which blossom in the paths of life reconciled with the peace which is in the grave; motions of the intellect as unwearied as the heavens, yet for all anxieties a halcyon calm; a tranquillity that seemed no product of inertia, but as if resulting from mighty and equal antagonisms; infinite activities, infinite repose.</p><p>Oh, just, subtle, and mighty opium! that to the hearts of poor and rich alike, for the wounds that will never heal, and for &quot;the pangs that tempt the spirit to rebel,&quot; bringest an assuaging balm; eloquent opium! that with thy potent rhetoric stealest away the purposes of wrath; and to the guilty man for one night givest back the hopes of his youth, and hands washed pure from blood; and to the proud man a brief oblivion for</p><p>Wrongs undress&apos;d and insults unavenged;</p><p>that summonest to the chancery of dreams, for the triumphs of suffering innocence, false witnesses; and confoundest perjury, and dost reverse the sentences of unrighteous judges;--thou buildest upon the bosom of darkness, out of the fantastic imagery of the brain, cities and temples beyond the art of Phidias and Praxiteles-- beyond the splendour of Babylon and Hekatompylos, and &quot;from the anarchy of dreaming sleep&quot; callest into sunny light the faces of long-buried beauties and the blessed household countenances cleansed from the &quot;dishonours of the grave.&quot; Thou only givest these gifts to man; and thou hast the keys of Paradise, oh, just, subtle, and mighty opium!</p><p>INTRODUCTION TO THE PAINS OF OPIUM</p><p>Courteous, and I hope indulgent, reader (for all MY readers must be indulgent ones, or else I fear I shall shock them too much to count on their courtesy), having accompanied me thus far, now let me request you to move onwards for about eight years; that is to say, from 1804 (when I have said that my acquaintance with opium first began) to 1812. The years of academic life are now over and gone-- almost forgotten; the student&apos;s cap no longer presses my temples; if my cap exist at all, it presses those of some youthful scholar, I trust, as happy as myself, and as passionate a lover of knowledge. My gown is by this time, I dare say, in the same condition with many thousand excellent books in the Bodleian, viz., diligently perused by certain studious moths and worms; or departed, however (which is all that I know of his fate), to that great reservoir of SOMEWHERE to which all the tea-cups, tea-caddies, tea-pots, tea-kettles, &amp;c., have departed (not to speak of still frailer vessels, such as glasses, decanters, bed-makers, &amp;c.), which occasional resemblances in the present generation of tea-cups, &amp;c., remind me of having once possessed, but of whose departure and final fate I, in common with most gownsmen of either university, could give, I suspect, but an obscure and conjectural history. The persecutions of the chapel- bell, sounding its unwelcome summons to six o&apos;clock matins, interrupts my slumbers no longer, the porter who rang it, upon whose beautiful nose (bronze, inlaid with copper) I wrote, in retaliation so many Greek epigrams whilst I was dressing, is dead, and has ceased to disturb anybody; and I, and many others who suffered much from his tintinnabulous propensities, have now agreed to overlook his errors, and have forgiven him. Even with the bell I am now in charity; it rings, I suppose, as formerly, thrice a-day, and cruelly annoys, I doubt not, many worthy gentlemen, and disturbs their peace of mind; but as to me, in this year 1812, I regard its treacherous voice no longer (treacherous I call it, for, by some refinement of malice, it spoke in as sweet and silvery tones as if it had been inviting one to a party); its tones have no longer, indeed, power to reach me, let the wind sit as favourable as the malice of the bell itself could wish, for I am 250 miles away from it, and buried in the depth of mountains. And what am I doing among the mountains? Taking opium. Yes; but what else? Why reader, in 1812, the year we are now arrived at, as well as for some years previous, I have been chiefly studying German metaphysics in the writings of Kant, Fichte, Schelling, &amp;c. And how and in what manner do I live?--in short, what class or description of men do I belong to? I am at this period--viz. in 1812--living in a cottage and with a single female servant (honi soit qui mal y pense), who amongst my neighbours passes by the name of my &quot;housekeeper.&quot; And as a scholar and a man of learned education, and in that sense a gentleman, I may presume to class myself as an unworthy member of that indefinite body called GENTLEMEN. Partly on the ground I have assigned perhaps, partly because from my having no visible calling or business, it is rightly judged that I must be living on my private fortune; I am so classed by my neighbours; and by the courtesy of modern England I am usually addressed on letters, &amp;c., &quot;Esquire,&quot; though having, I fear, in the rigorous construction of heralds, but slender pretensions to that distinguished honour; yet in popular estimation I am X. Y. Z., Esquire, but not justice of the Peace nor Custos Rotulorum. Am I married? Not yet. And I still take opium? On Saturday nights. And perhaps have taken it unblushingly ever since &quot;the rainy Sunday,&quot; and &quot;the stately Pantheon,&quot; and &quot;the beatific druggist&quot; of 1804? Even so. And how do I find my health after all this opium- eating? In short, how do I do? Why, pretty well, I thank you, reader; in the phrase of ladies in the straw, &quot;as well as can be expected.&quot; In fact, if I dared to say the real and simple truth, though, to satisfy the theories of medical men, I OUGHT to be ill, I never was better in my life than in the spring of 1812; and I hope sincerely that the quantity of claret, port, or &quot;particular Madeira,&quot; which in all probability you, good reader, have taken, and design to take for every term of eight years during your natural life, may as little disorder your health as mine was disordered by the opium I had taken for eight years, between 1804 and 1812. Hence you may see again the danger of taking any medical advice from Anastasius; in divinity, for aught I know, or law, he may be a safe counsellor; but not in medicine. No; it is far better to consult Dr. Buchan, as I did; for I never forgot that worthy man&apos;s excellent suggestion, and I was &quot;particularly careful not to take above five- and-twenty ounces of laudanum.&quot; To this moderation and temperate use of the article I may ascribe it, I suppose, that as yet, at least (i.e. in 1812), I am ignorant and unsuspicious of the avenging terrors which opium has in store for those who abuse its lenity. At the same time, it must not be forgotten that hitherto I have been only a dilettante eater of opium; eight years&apos; practice even, with a single precaution of allowing sufficient intervals between every indulgence, has not been sufficient to make opium necessary to me as an article of daily diet. But now comes a different era. Move on, if you please, reader, to 1813. In the summer of the year we have just quitted I have suffered much in bodily health from distress of mind connected with a very melancholy event. This event being no ways related to the subject now before me, further than through the bodily illness which it produced, I need not more particularly notice. Whether this illness of 1812 had any share in that of 1813 I know not; but so it was, that in the latter year I was attacked by a most appalling irritation of the stomach, in all respects the same as that which had caused me so much suffering in youth, and accompanied by a revival of all the old dreams. This is the point of my narrative on which, as respects my own self-justification, the whole of what follows may be said to hinge. And here I find myself in a perplexing dilemma. Either, on the one hand, I must exhaust the reader&apos;s patience by such a detail of my malady, or of my struggles with it, as might suffice to establish the fact of my inability to wrestle any longer with irritation and constant suffering; or, on the other hand, by passing lightly over this critical part of my story, I must forego the benefit of a stronger impression left on the mind of the reader, and must lay myself open to the misconstruction of having slipped, by the easy and gradual steps of self-indulging persons, from the first to the final stage of opium-eating (a misconstruction to which there will be a lurking predisposition in most readers, from my previous acknowledgements). This is the dilemma, the first horn of which would be sufficient to toss and gore any column of patient readers, though drawn up sixteen deep and constantly relieved by fresh men; consequently that is not to be thought of. It remains, then, that I POSTULALE so much as is necessary for my purpose. And let me take as full credit for what I postulate as if I had demonstrated it, good reader, at the expense of your patience and my own. Be not so ungenerous as to let me suffer in your good opinion through my own forbearance and regard for your comfort. No; believe all that I ask of you--viz., that I could resist no longer; believe it liberally and as an act of grace, or else in mere prudence; for if not, then in the next edition of my Opium Confessions, revised and enlarged, I will make you believe and tremble; and a force d&apos;ennuyer, by mere dint of pandiculation I will terrify all readers of mine from ever again questioning any postulate that I shall think fit to make.</p><p>This, then, let me repeat, I postulate--that at the time I began to take opium daily I could not have done otherwise. Whether, indeed, afterwards I might not have succeeded in breaking off the habit, even when it seemed to me that all efforts would be unavailing, and whether many of the innumerable efforts which I did make might not have been carried much further, and my gradual reconquests of ground lost might not have been followed up much more energetically--these are questions which I must decline. Perhaps I might make out a case of palliation; but shall I speak ingenuously? I confess it, as a besetting infirmity of mine, that I am too much of an Eudaemonist; I hanker too much after a state of happiness, both for myself and others; I cannot face misery, whether my own or not, with an eye of sufficient firmness, and am little capable of encountering present pain for the sake of any reversionary benefit. On some other matters I can agree with the gentlemen in the cotton trade {15} at Manchester in affecting the Stoic philosophy, but not in this. Here I take the liberty of an Eclectic philosopher, and I look out for some courteous and considerate sect that will condescend more to the infirm condition of an opium-eater; that are &quot;sweet men,&quot; as Chaucer says, &quot;to give absolution,&quot; and will show some conscience in the penances they inflict, and the efforts of abstinence they exact from poor sinners like myself. An inhuman moralist I can no more endure in my nervous state than opium that has not been boiled. At any rate, he who summons me to send out a large freight of self-denial and mortification upon any cruising voyage of moral improvement, must make it clear to my understanding that the concern is a hopeful one. At my time of life (six-and-thirty years of age) it cannot be supposed that I have much energy to spare; in fact, I find it all little enough for the intellectual labours I have on my hands, and therefore let no man expect to frighten me by a few hard words into embarking any part of it upon desperate adventures of morality.</p><p>Whether desperate or not, however, the issue of the struggle in 1813 was what I have mentioned, and from this date the reader is to consider me as a regular and confirmed opium-eater, of whom to ask whether on any particular day he had or had not taken opium, would be to ask whether his lungs had performed respiration, or the heart fulfilled its functions. You understand now, reader, what I am, and you are by this time aware that no old gentleman &quot;with a snow-white beard&quot; will have any chance of persuading me to surrender &quot;the little golden receptacle of the pernicious drug.&quot; No; I give notice to all, whether moralists or surgeons, that whatever be their pretensions and skill in their respective lines of practice, they must not hope for any countenance from me, if they think to begin by any savage proposition for a Lent or a Ramadan of abstinence from opium. This, then, being all fully understood between us, we shall in future sail before the wind. Now then, reader, from 1813, where all this time we have been sitting down and loitering, rise up, if you please, and walk forward about three years more. Now draw up the curtain, and you shall see me in a new character.</p><p>If any man, poor or rich, were to say that he would tell us what had been the happiest day in his life, and the why and the wherefore, I suppose that we should all cry out--Hear him! Hear him! As to the happiest DAY, that must be very difficult for any wise man to name, because any event that could occupy so distinguished a place in a man&apos;s retrospect of his life, or be entitled to have shed a special felicity on any one day, ought to be of such an enduring character as that (accidents apart) it should have continued to shed the same felicity, or one not distinguishably less, on many years together. To the happiest LUSTRUM, however, or even to the happiest YEAR, it may be allowed to any man to point without discountenance from wisdom. This year, in my case, reader, was the one which we have now reached; though it stood, I confess, as a parenthesis between years of a gloomier character. It was a year of brilliant water (to speak after the manner of jewellers), set as it were, and insulated, in the gloom and cloudy melancholy of opium. Strange as it may sound, I had a little before this time descended suddenly, and without any considerable effort, from 320 grains of opium (i.e. eight {16} thousand drops of laudanum) per day, to forty grains, or one-eighth part. Instantaneously, and as if by magic, the cloud of profoundest melancholy which rested upon my brain, like some black vapours that I have seen roll away from the summits of mountains, drew off in one day ([Greek text]); passed off with its murky banners as simultaneously as a ship that has been stranded, and is floated off by a spring tide -</p><p>That moveth altogether, if it move at all.</p><p>Now, then, I was again happy; I now took only 1000 drops of laudanum per day; and what was that? A latter spring had come to close up the season of youth; my brain performed its functions as healthily as ever before; I read Kant again, and again I understood him, or fancied that I did. Again my feelings of pleasure expanded themselves to all around me; and if any man from Oxford or Cambridge, or from neither, had been announced to me in my unpretending cottage, I should have welcomed him with as sumptuous a reception as so poor a man could offer. Whatever else was wanting to a wise man&apos;s happiness, of laudanum I would have given him as much as he wished, and in a golden cup. And, by the way, now that I speak of giving laudanum away, I remember about this time a little incident, which I mention because, trifling as it was, the reader will soon meet it again in my dreams, which it influenced more fearfully than could be imagined. One day a Malay knocked at my door. What business a Malay could have to transact amongst English mountains I cannot conjecture; but possibly he was on his road to a seaport about forty miles distant.</p><p>The servant who opened the door to him was a young girl, born and bred amongst the mountains, who had never seen an Asiatic dress of any sort; his turban therefore confounded her not a little; and as it turned out that his attainments in English were exactly of the same extent as hers in the Malay, there seemed to be an impassable gulf fixed between all communication of ideas, if either party had happened to possess any. In this dilemma, the girl, recollecting the reputed learning of her master (and doubtless giving me credit for a knowledge of all the languages of the earth besides perhaps a few of the lunar ones), came and gave me to understand that there was a sort of demon below, whom she clearly imagined that my art could exorcise from the house. I did not immediately go down, but when I did, the group which presented itself, arranged as it was by accident, though not very elaborate, took hold of my fancy and my eye in a way that none of the statuesque attitudes exhibited in the ballets at the Opera-house, though so ostentatiously complex, had ever done. In a cottage kitchen, but panelled on the wall with dark wood that from age and rubbing resembled oak, and looking more like a rustic hall of entrance than a kitchen, stood the Malay--his turban and loose trousers of dingy white relieved upon the dark panelling. He had placed himself nearer to the girl than she seemed to relish, though her native spirit of mountain intrepidity contended with the feeling of simple awe which her countenance expressed as she gazed upon the tiger-cat before her. And a more striking picture there could not be imagined than the beautiful English face of the girl, and its exquisite fairness, together with her erect and independent attitude, contrasted with the sallow and bilious skin of the Malay, enamelled or veneered with mahogany by marine air, his small, fierce, restless eyes, thin lips, slavish gestures and adorations. Half-hidden by the ferocious-looking Malay was a little child from a neighbouring cottage who had crept in after him, and was now in the act of reverting its head and gazing upwards at the turban and the fiery eyes beneath it, whilst with one hand he caught at the dress of the young woman for protection. My knowledge of the Oriental tongues is not remarkably extensive, being indeed confined to two words--the Arabic word for barley and the Turkish for opium (madjoon), which I have learned from Anastasius; and as I had neither a Malay dictionary nor even Adelung&apos;s Mithridates, which might have helped me to a few words, I addressed him in some lines from the Iliad, considering that, of such languages as I possessed, Greek, in point of longitude, came geographically nearest to an Oriental one. He worshipped me in a most devout manner, and replied in what I suppose was Malay. In this way I saved my reputation with my neighbours, for the Malay had no means of betraying the secret. He lay down upon the floor for about an hour, and then pursued his journey. On his departure I presented him with a piece of opium. To him, as an Orientalist, I concluded that opium must be familiar; and the expression of his face convinced me that it was. Nevertheless, I was struck with some little consternation when I saw him suddenly raise his hand to his mouth, and, to use the schoolboy phrase, bolt the whole, divided into three pieces, at one mouthful. The quantity was enough to kill three dragoons and their horses, and I felt some alarm for the poor creature; but what could be done? I had given him the opium in compassion for his solitary life, on recollecting that if he had travelled on foot from London it must be nearly three weeks since he could have exchanged a thought with any human being. I could not think of violating the laws of hospitality by having him seized and drenched with an emetic, and thus frightening him into a notion that we were going to sacrifice him to some English idol. No: there was clearly no help for it. He took his leave, and for some days I felt anxious, but as I never heard of any Malay being found dead, I became convinced that he was used {17} to opium; and that I must have done him the service I designed by giving him one night of respite from the pains of wandering.</p><p>This incident I have digressed to mention, because this Malay (partly from the picturesque exhibition he assisted to frame, partly from the anxiety I connected with his image for some days) fastened afterwards upon my dreams, and brought other Malays with him, worse than himself, that ran &quot;a-muck&quot; {18} at me, and led me into a world of troubles. But to quit this episode, and to return to my intercalary year of happiness. I have said already, that on a subject so important to us all as happiness, we should listen with pleasure to any man&apos;s experience or experiments, even though he were but a plough-boy, who cannot be supposed to have ploughed very deep into such an intractable soil as that of human pains and pleasures, or to have conducted his researches upon any very enlightened principles. But I who have taken happiness both in a solid and liquid shape, both boiled and unboiled, both East India and Turkey-- who have conducted my experiments upon this interesting subject with a sort of galvanic battery, and have, for the general benefit of the world, inoculated myself, as it were, with the poison of 8000 drops of laudanum per day (just for the same reason as a French surgeon inoculated himself lately with cancer, an English one twenty years ago with plague, and a third, I know not of what nation, with hydrophobia), I (it will be admitted) must surely know what happiness is, if anybody does. And therefore I will here lay down an analysis of happiness; and as the most interesting mode of communicating it, I will give it, not didactically, but wrapped up and involved in a picture of one evening, as I spent every evening during the intercalary year when laudanum, though taken daily, was to me no more than the elixir of pleasure. This done, I shall quit the subject of happiness altogether, and pass to a very different one--THE PAINS OF OPIUM.</p><p>Let there be a cottage standing in a valley, eighteen miles from any town--no spacious valley, but about two miles long by three-quarters of a mile in average width; the benefit of which provision is that all the family resident within its circuit will compose, as it were, one larger household, personally familiar to your eye, and more or less interesting to your affections. Let the mountains be real mountains, between 3,000 and 4,000 feet high, and the cottage a real cottage, not (as a witty author has it) &quot;a cottage with a double coach-house;&quot; let it be, in fact (for I must abide by the actual scene), a white cottage, embowered with flowering shrubs, so chosen as to unfold a succession of flowers upon the walls and clustering round the windows through all the months of spring, summer, and autumn--beginning, in fact, with May roses, and ending with jasmine. Let it, however, NOT be spring, nor summer, nor autumn, but winter in his sternest shape. This is a most important point in the science of happiness. And I am surprised to see people overlook it, and think it matter of congratulation that winter is going, or, if coming, is not likely to be a severe one. On the contrary, I put up a petition annually for as much snow, hail, frost, or storm, of one kind or other, as the skies can possibly afford us. Surely everybody is aware of the divine pleasures which attend a winter fireside, candles at four o&apos;clock, warm hearth-rugs, tea, a fair tea-maker, shutters closed, curtains flowing in ample draperies on the floor, whilst the wind and rain are raging audibly without,</p><p>And at the doors and windows seem to call, As heav&apos;n and earth they would together mell; Yet the least entrance find they none at all; Whence sweeter grows our rest secure in massy hall. Castle of Indolence.</p><p>All these are items in the description of a winter evening which must surely be familiar to everybody born in a high latitude. And it is evident that most of these delicacies, like ice-cream, require a very low temperature of the atmosphere to produce them; they are fruits which cannot be ripened without weather stormy or inclement in some way or other. I am not &quot;PARTICULAR,&quot; as people say, whether it be snow, or black frost, or wind so strong that (as Mr.--says) &quot;you may lean your back against it like a post.&quot; I can put up even with rain, provided it rains cats and dogs; but something of the sort I must have, and if I have it not, I think myself in a manner ill-used; for why am I called on to pay so heavily for winter, in coals and candles, and various privations that will occur even to gentlemen, if I am not to have the article good of its kind? No, a Canadian winter for my money, or a Russian one, where every man is but a co-proprietor with the north wind in the fee-simple of his own ears. Indeed, so great an epicure am I in this matter that I cannot relish a winter night fully if it be much past St. Thomas&apos;s day, and have degenerated into disgusting tendencies to vernal appearances. No, it must be divided by a thick wall of dark nights from all return of light and sunshine. From the latter weeks of October to Christmas Eve, therefore, is the period during which happiness is in season, which, in my judgment, enters the room with the tea-tray; for tea, though ridiculed by those who are naturally of coarse nerves, or are become so from wine-drinking, and are not susceptible of influence from so refined a stimulant, will always be the favourite beverage of the intellectual; and, for my part, I would have joined Dr. Johnson in a bellum internecinum against Jonas Hanway, or any other impious person, who should presume to disparage it. But here, to save myself the trouble of too much verbal description, I will introduce a painter, and give him directions for the rest of the picture. Painters do not like white cottages, unless a good deal weather-stained; but as the reader now understands that it is a winter night, his services will not be required except for the inside of the house.</p><p>Paint me, then, a room seventeen feet by twelve, and not more than seven and a half feet high. This, reader, is somewhat ambitiously styled in my family the drawing-room; but being contrived &quot;a double debt to pay,&quot; it is also, and more justly, termed the library, for it happens that books are the only article of property in which I am richer than my neighbours. Of these I have about five thousand, collected gradually since my eighteenth year. Therefore, painter, put as many as you can into this room. Make it populous with books, and, furthermore, paint me a good fire, and furniture plain and modest, befitting the unpretending cottage of a scholar. And near the fire paint me a tea-table, and (as it is clear that no creature can come to see one such a stormy night) place only two cups and saucers on the tea-tray; and, if you know how to paint such a thing symbolically or otherwise, paint me an eternal tea-pot--eternal a parte ante and a parte post--for I usually drink tea from eight o&apos;clock at night to four o&apos;clock in the morning. And as it is very unpleasant to make tea or to pour it out for oneself, paint me a lovely young woman sitting at the table. Paint her arms like Aurora&apos;s and her smiles like Hebe&apos;s. But no, dear M., not even in jest let me insinuate that thy power to illuminate my cottage rests upon a tenure so perishable as mere personal beauty, or that the witchcraft of angelic smiles lies within the empire of any earthly pencil. Pass then, my good painter, to something more within its power; and the next article brought forward should naturally be myself--a picture of the Opium-eater, with his &quot;little golden receptacle of the pernicious drug&quot; lying beside him on the table. As to the opium, I have no objection to see a picture of THAT, though I would rather see the original. You may paint it if you choose, but I apprise you that no &quot;little&quot; receptacle would, even in 1816, answer MY purpose, who was at a distance from the &quot;stately Pantheon,&quot; and all druggists (mortal or otherwise). No, you may as well paint the real receptacle, which was not of gold, but of glass, and as much like a wine-decanter as possible. Into this you may put a quart of ruby-coloured laudanum; that, and a book of German Metaphysics placed by its side, will sufficiently attest my being in the neighbourhood. But as to myself--there I demur. I admit that, naturally, I ought to occupy the foreground of the picture; that being the hero of the piece, or (if you choose) the criminal at the bar, my body should be had into court. This seems reasonable; but why should I confess on this point to a painter? or why confess at all? If the public (into whose private ear I am confidentially whispering my confessions, and not into any painter&apos;s) should chance to have framed some agreeable picture for itself of the Opium- eater&apos;s exterior, should have ascribed to him, romantically an elegant person or a handsome face, why should I barbarously tear from it so pleasing a delusion--pleasing both to the public and to me? No; paint me, if at all, according to your own fancy, and as a painter&apos;s fancy should teem with beautiful creations, I cannot fail in that way to be a gainer. And now, reader, we have run through all the ten categories of my condition as it stood about 1816-17, up to the middle of which latter year I judge myself to have been a happy man, and the elements of that happiness I have endeavoured to place before you in the above sketch of the interior of a scholar&apos;s library, in a cottage among the mountains, on a stormy winter evening.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[This I regret; but another person there was at that time whom I have since sought to trace with far deeper earnestness]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/this-i-regret-but-another-person-there-was-at-that-time-whom-i-have-since-sought-to-trace-with-far-deeper-earnestness</link>
            <guid>W6uigQIropA2JevhhFdF</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 14:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[with far deeper sorrow at my failure. This person was a young woman, and one of that unhappy class who subsist upon the wages of prostitution. I feel no shame, nor have any reason to feel it, in avowing that I was then on familiar and friendly terms with many women in that unfortunate condition. The reader needs neither smile at this avowal nor frown; for, not to remind my classical readers of the old Latin proverb, "Sine cerere," &c., it may well be supposed that in the existing state of my ...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with far deeper sorrow at my failure. This person was a young woman, and one of that unhappy class who subsist upon the wages of prostitution. I feel no shame, nor have any reason to feel it, in avowing that I was then on familiar and friendly terms with many women in that unfortunate condition. The reader needs neither smile at this avowal nor frown; for, not to remind my classical readers of the old Latin proverb, &quot;Sine cerere,&quot; &amp;c., it may well be supposed that in the existing state of my purse my connection with such women could not have been an impure one. But the truth is, that at no time of my life have I been a person to hold myself polluted by the touch or approach of any creature that wore a human shape; on the contrary, from my very earliest youth it has been my pride to converse familiarly, MORE SOCRATIO, with all human beings, man, woman, and child, that chance might fling in my way; a practice which is friendly to the knowledge of human nature, to good feelings, and to that frankness of address which becomes a man who would be thought a philosopher. For a philosopher should not see with the eyes of the poor limitary creature calling himself a man of the world, and filled with narrow and self-regarding prejudices of birth and education, but should look upon himself as a catholic creature, and as standing in equal relation to high and low, to educated and uneducated, to the guilty and the innocent. Being myself at that time of necessity a peripatetic, or a walker of the streets, I naturally fell in more frequently with those female peripatetics who are technically called street-walkers. Many of these women had occasionally taken my part against watchmen who wished to drive me off the steps of houses where I was sitting. But one amongst them, the one on whose account I have at all introduced this subject--yet no! let me not class the, oh! noble-minded Ann--with that order of women. Let me find, if it be possible, some gentler name to designate the condition of her to whose bounty and compassion, ministering to my necessities when all the world had forsaken me, I owe it that I am at this time alive. For many weeks I had walked at nights with this poor friendless girl up and down Oxford Street, or had rested with her on steps and under the shelter of porticoes. She could not be so old as myself; she told me, indeed, that she had not completed her sixteenth year. By such questions as my interest about her prompted I had gradually drawn forth her simple history. Hers was a case of ordinary occurrence (as I have since had reason to think), and one in which, if London beneficence had better adapted its arrangements to meet it, the power of the law might oftener be interposed to protect and to avenge. But the stream of London charity flows in a channel which, though deep and mighty, is yet noiseless and underground; not obvious or readily accessible to poor houseless wanderers; and it cannot be denied that the outside air and framework of London society is harsh, cruel, and repulsive. In any case, however, I saw that part of her injuries might easily have been redressed, and I urged her often and earnestly to lay her complaint before a magistrate. Friendless as she was, I assured her that she would meet with immediate attention, and that English justice, which was no respecter of persons, would speedily and amply avenge her on the brutal ruffian who had plundered her little property. She promised me often that she would, but she delayed taking the steps I pointed out from time to time, for she was timid and dejected to a degree which showed how deeply sorrow had taken hold of her young heart; and perhaps she thought justly that the most upright judge and the most righteous tribunals could do nothing to repair her heaviest wrongs. Something, however, would perhaps have been done, for it had been settled between us at length, but unhappily on the very last time but one that I was ever to see her, that in a day or two we should go together before a magistrate, and that I should speak on her behalf. This little service it was destined, however, that I should never realise. Meantime, that which she rendered to me, and which was greater than I could ever have repaid her, was this:- One night, when we were pacing slowly along Oxford Street, and after a day when I had felt more than usually ill and faint, I requested her to turn off with me into Soho Square. Thither we went, and we sat down on the steps of a house, which to this hour I never pass without a pang of grief and an inner act of homage to the spirit of that unhappy girl, in memory of the noble action which she there performed. Suddenly, as we sate, I grew much worse. I had been leaning my head against her bosom, and all at once I sank from her arms and fell backwards on the steps. From the sensations I then had, I felt an inner conviction of the liveliest kind, that without some powerful and reviving stimulus I should either have died on the spot, or should at least have sunk to a point of exhaustion from which all reascent under my friendless circumstances would soon have become hopeless. Then it was, at this crisis of my fate, that my poor orphan companion, who had herself met with little but injuries in this world, stretched out a saving hand to me. Uttering a cry of terror, but without a moment&apos;s delay, she ran off into Oxford Street, and in less time than could be imagined returned to me with a glass of port wine and spices, that acted upon my empty stomach, which at that time would have rejected all solid food, with an instantaneous power of restoration; and for this glass the generous girl without a murmur paid out of her humble purse at a time--be it remembered!--when she had scarcely wherewithal to purchase the bare necessaries of life, and when she could have no reason to expect that I should ever be able to reimburse her.</p><p>Oh, youthful benefactress! how often in succeeding years, standing in solitary places, and thinking of thee with grief of heart and perfect love--how often have I wished that, as in ancient times, the curse of a father was believed to have a supernatural power, and to pursue its object with a fatal necessity of self-fulfilment; even so the benediction of a heart oppressed with gratitude might have a like prerogative, might have power given to it from above to chase, to haunt, to waylay, to overtake, to pursue thee into the central darkness of a London brothel, or (if it were possible) into the darkness of the grave, there to awaken thee with an authentic message of peace and forgiveness, and of final reconciliation!</p><p>I do not often weep: for not only do my thoughts on subjects connected with the chief interests of man daily, nay hourly, descend a thousand fathoms &quot;too deep for tears;&quot; not only does the sternness of my habits of thought present an antagonism to the feelings which prompt tears--wanting of necessity to those who, being protected usually by their levity from any tendency to meditative sorrow, would by that same levity be made incapable of resisting it on any casual access of such feelings; but also, I believe that all minds which have contemplated such objects as deeply as I have done, must, for their own protection from utter despondency, have early encouraged and cherished some tranquillising belief as to the future balances and the hieroglyphic meanings of human sufferings. On these accounts I am cheerful to this hour, and, as I have said, I do not often weep. Yet some feelings, though not deeper or more passionate, are more tender than others; and often, when I walk at this time in Oxford Street by dreamy lamplight, and hear those airs played on a barrel-organ which years ago solaced me and my dear companion (as I must always call her), I shed tears, and muse with myself at the mysterious dispensation which so suddenly and so critically separated us for ever. How it happened the reader will understand from what remains of this introductory narration.</p><p>Soon after the period of the last incident I have recorded I met in Albemarle Street a gentleman of his late Majesty&apos;s household. This gentleman had received hospitalities on different occasions from my family, and he challenged me upon the strength of my family likeness. I did not attempt any disguise; I answered his questions ingenuously, and, on his pledging his word of honour that he would not betray me to my guardians, I gave him an address to my friend the attorney&apos;s. The next day I received from him a 10 pound bank- note. The letter enclosing it was delivered with other letters of business to the attorney, but though his look and manner informed me that he suspected its contents, he gave it up to me honourably and without demur.</p><p>This present, from the particular service to which it was applied, leads me naturally to speak of the purpose which had allured me up to London, and which I had been (to use a forensic word) soliciting from the first day of my arrival in London to that of my final departure.</p><p>In so mighty a world as London it will surprise my readers that I should not have found some means of starving off the last extremities, of penury; and it will strike them that two resources at least must have been open to me--viz., either to seek assistance from the friends of my family, or to turn my youthful talents and attainments into some channel of pecuniary emolument. As to the first course, I may observe generally, that what I dreaded beyond all other evils was the chance of being reclaimed by my guardians; not doubting that whatever power the law gave them would have been enforced against me to the utmost--that is, to the extremity of forcibly restoring me to the school which I had quitted, a restoration which, as it would in my eyes have been a dishonour, even if submitted to voluntarily, could not fail, when extorted from me in contempt and defiance of my own wishes and efforts, to have been a humiliation worse to me than death, and which would indeed have terminated in death. I was therefore shy enough of applying for assistance even in those quarters where I was sure of receiving it, at the risk of furnishing my guardians with any clue of recovering me. But as to London in particular, though doubtless my father had in his lifetime had many friends there, yet (as ten years had passed since his death) I remembered few of them even by name; and never having seen London before, except once for a few hours, I knew not the address of even those few. To this mode of gaining help, therefore, in part the difficulty, but much more the paramount fear which I have mentioned, habitually indisposed me. In regard to the other mode, I now feel half inclined to join my reader in wondering that I should have overlooked it. As a corrector of Greek proofs (if in no other way) I might doubtless have gained enough for my slender wants. Such an office as this I could have discharged with an exemplary and punctual accuracy that would soon have gained me the confidence of my employers. But it must not be forgotten that, even for such an office as this, it was necessary that I should first of all have an introduction to some respectable publisher, and this I had no means of obtaining. To say the truth, however, it had never once occurred to me to think of literary labours as a source of profit. No mode sufficiently speedy of obtaining money had ever occurred to me but that of borrowing it on the strength of my future claims and expectations. This mode I sought by every avenue to compass; and amongst other persons I applied to a Jew named D- {4}</p><p>To this Jew, and to other advertising money-lenders (some of whom were, I believe, also Jews), I had introduced myself with an account of my expectations; which account, on examining my father&apos;s will at Doctors&apos; Commons, they had ascertained to be correct. The person there mentioned as the second son of--was found to have all the claims (or more than all) that I had stated; but one question still remained, which the faces of the Jews pretty significantly suggested--was I that person? This doubt had never occurred to me as a possible one; I had rather feared, whenever my Jewish friends scrutinised me keenly, that I might be too well known to be that person, and that some scheme might be passing in their minds for entrapping me and selling me to my guardians. It was strange to me to find my own self materialiter considered (so I expressed it, for I doated on logical accuracy of distinctions), accused, or at least suspected, of counterfeiting my own self formaliter considered. However, to satisfy their scruples, I took the only course in my power. Whilst I was in Wales I had received various letters from young friends these I produced, for I carried them constantly in my pocket, being, indeed, by this time almost the only relics of my personal encumbrances (excepting the clothes I wore) which I had not in one way or other disposed of. Most of these letters were from the Earl of -, who was at that time my chief (or rather only) confidential friend. These letters were dated from Eton. I had also some from the Marquis of -, his father, who, though absorbed in agricultural pursuits, yet having been an Etonian himself, and as good a scholar as a nobleman needs to be, still retained an affection for classical studies and for youthful scholars. He had accordingly, from the time that I was fifteen, corresponded with me; sometimes upon the great improvements which he had made or was meditating in the counties of M- and Sl- since I had been there, sometimes upon the merits of a Latin poet, and at other times suggesting subjects to me on which he wished me to write verses.</p><p>On reading the letters, one of my Jewish friends agreed to furnish me with two or three hundred pounds on my personal security, provided I could persuade the young Earl--who was, by the way, not older than myself--to guarantee the payment on our coming of age; the Jew&apos;s final object being, as I now suppose, not the trifling profit he could expect to make by me, but the prospect of establishing a connection with my noble friend, whose immense expectations were well known to him. In pursuance of this proposal on the part of the Jew, about eight or nine days after I had received the 10 pounds, I prepared to go down to Eton. Nearly 3 pounds of the money I had given to my money-lending friend, on his alleging that the stamps must be bought, in order that the writings might be preparing whilst I was away from London. I thought in my heart that he was lying; but I did not wish to give him any excuse for charging his own delays upon me. A smaller sum I had given to my friend the attorney (who was connected with the money-lenders as their lawyer), to which, indeed, he was entitled for his unfurnished lodgings. About fifteen shillings I had employed in re-establishing (though in a very humble way) my dress. Of the remainder I gave one quarter to Ann, meaning on my return to have divided with her whatever might remain. These arrangements made, soon after six o&apos;clock on a dark winter evening I set off, accompanied by Ann, towards Piccadilly; for it was my intention to go down as far as Salthill on the Bath or Bristol mail. Our course lay through a part of the town which has now all disappeared, so that I can no longer retrace its ancient boundaries--Swallow Street, I think it was called. Having time enough before us, however, we bore away to the left until we came into Golden Square; there, near the corner of Sherrard Street, we sat down, not wishing to part in the tumult and blaze of Piccadilly. I had told her of my plans some time before, and I now assured her again that she should share in my good fortune, if I met with any, and that I would never forsake her as soon as I had power to protect her. This I fully intended, as much from inclination as from a sense of duty; for setting aside gratitude, which in any case must have made me her debtor for life, I loved her as affectionately as if she had been my sister; and at this moment with sevenfold tenderness, from pity at witnessing her extreme dejection. I had apparently most reason for dejection, because I was leaving the saviour of my life; yet I, considering the shock my health had received, was cheerful and full of hope. She, on the contrary, who was parting with one who had had little means of serving her, except by kindness and brotherly treatment, was overcome by sorrow; so that, when I kissed her at our final farewell, she put her arms about my neck and wept without speaking a word. I hoped to return in a week at farthest, and I agreed with her that on the fifth night from that, and every night afterwards, she would wait for me at six o&apos;clock near the bottom of Great Titchfield Street, which had been our customary haven, as it were, of rendezvous, to prevent our missing each other in the great Mediterranean of Oxford Street. This and other measures of precaution I took; one only I forgot. She had either never told me, or (as a matter of no great interest) I had forgotten her surname. It is a general practice, indeed, with girls of humble rank in her unhappy condition, not (as novel-reading women of higher pretensions) to style themselves Miss Douglas, Miss Montague, &amp;c., but simply by their Christian names--Mary, Jane, Frances, &amp;c. Her surname, as the surest means of tracing her hereafter, I ought now to have inquired; but the truth is, having no reason to think that our meeting could, in consequence of a short interruption, be more difficult or uncertain than it had been for so many weeks, I had scarcely for a moment adverted to it as necessary, or placed it amongst my memoranda against this parting interview; and my final anxieties being spent in comforting her with hopes, and in pressing upon her the necessity of getting some medicines for a violent cough and hoarseness with which she was troubled, I wholly forgot it until it was too late to recall her.</p><p>It was past eight o&apos;clock when I reached the Gloucester Coffee- house, and the Bristol mail being on the point of going off, I mounted on the outside. The fine fluent motion {5} of this mail soon laid me asleep: it is somewhat remarkable that the first easy or refreshing sleep which I had enjoyed for some months, was on the outside of a mail-coach--a bed which at this day I find rather an uneasy one. Connected with this sleep was a little incident which served, as hundreds of others did at that time, to convince me how easily a man who has never been in any great distress may pass through life without knowing, in his own person at least, anything of the possible goodness of the human heart--or, as I must add with a sigh, of its possible vileness. So thick a curtain of MANNERS is drawn over the features and expression of men&apos;s NATURES, that to the ordinary observer the two extremities, and the infinite field of varieties which lie between them, are all confounded; the vast and multitudinous compass of their several harmonies reduced to the meagre outline of differences expressed in the gamut or alphabet of elementary sounds. The case was this: for the first four or five miles from London I annoyed my fellow-passenger on the roof by occasionally falling against him when the coach gave a lurch to his: side; and indeed, if the road had been less smooth and level than it is, I should have fallen off from weakness. Of this annoyance he complained heavily, as perhaps, in the same circumstances, most people would; he expressed his complaint, however, more morosely than the occasion seemed to warrant, and if I had parted with him at that moment I should have thought of him (if I had considered it worth while to think of him at all) as a surly and almost brutal fellow. However, I was conscious that I had given him some cause for complaint, and therefore I apologized to him, and assured him I would do what I could to avoid falling asleep for the future; and at the same time, in as few words as possible, I explained to him that I was ill and in a weak state from long suffering, and that I could not afford at that time to take an inside place. This man&apos;s manner changed, upon hearing this explanation, in an instant; and when I next woke for a minute from the noise and lights of Hounslow (for in spite of my wishes and efforts I had fallen asleep again within two minutes from the time I had spoken to him) I found that he had put his arm round me to protect me from falling off, and for the rest of my journey he behaved to me with the gentleness of a woman, so that at length I almost lay in his arms; and this was the more kind, as he could not have known that I was not going the whole way to Bath or Bristol. Unfortunately, indeed, I DID go rather farther than I intended, for so genial and so refreshing was my sleep, that the next time after leaving Hounslow that I fully awoke was upon the sudden pulling up of the mail (possibly at a post-office), and on inquiry I found that we had reached Maidenhead--six or seven miles, I think, ahead of Salthill. Here I alighted, and for the half- minute that the mail stopped I was entreated by my friendly companion (who, from the transient glimpse I had had of him in Piccadilly, seemed to me to be a gentleman&apos;s butler, or person of that rank) to go to bed without delay. This I promised, though with no intention of doing so; and in fact I immediately set forward, or rather backward, on foot. It must then have been nearly midnight, but so slowly did I creep along that I heard a clock in a cottage strike four before I turned down the lane from Slough to Eton. The air and the sleep had both refreshed me; but I was weary nevertheless. I remember a thought (obvious enough, and which has been prettily expressed by a Roman poet) which gave me some consolation at that moment under my poverty. There had been some time before a murder committed on or near Hounslow Heath. I think I cannot be mistaken when I say that the name of the murdered person was STEELE, and that he was the owner of a lavender plantation in that neighbourhood. Every step of my progress was bringing me nearer to the Heath, and it naturally occurred to me that I and the accused murderer, if he were that night abroad, might at every instant be unconsciously approaching each other through the darkness; in which case, said I--supposing I, instead of being (as indeed I am) little better than an outcast -</p><p>Lord of my learning, and no land beside -</p><p>were, like my friend Lord -, heir by general repute to 70,000 pounds per annum, what a panic should I be under at this moment about my throat! Indeed, it was not likely that Lord--should ever be in my situation. But nevertheless, the spirit of the remark remains true- -that vast power and possessions make a man shamefully afraid of dying; and I am convinced that many of the most intrepid adventurers, who, by fortunately being poor, enjoy the full use of their natural courage, would, if at the very instant of going into action news were brought to them that they had unexpectedly succeeded to an estate in England of 50,000 pounds a-year, feel their dislike to bullets considerably sharpened, {6} and their efforts at perfect equanimity and self-possession proportionably difficult. So true it is, in the language of a wise man whose own experience had made him acquainted with both fortunes, that riches are better fitted</p><p>To slacken virtue, and abate her edge, Than tempt her to do ought may merit praise. Paradise Regained.</p><p>I dally with my subject because, to myself, the remembrance of these times is profoundly interesting. But my reader shall not have any further cause to complain, for I now hasten to its close. In the road between Slough and Eton I fell asleep, and just as the morning began to dawn I was awakened by the voice of a man standing over me and surveying me. I know not what he was: he was an ill-looking fellow, but not therefore of necessity an ill-meaning fellow; or, if he were, I suppose he thought that no person sleeping out-of-doors in winter could be worth robbing. In which conclusion, however, as it regarded myself, I beg to assure him, if he should be among my readers, that he was mistaken. After a slight remark he passed on; and I was not sorry at his disturbance, as it enabled me to pass through Eton before people were generally up. The night had been heavy and lowering, but towards the morning it had changed to a slight frost, and the ground and the trees were now covered with rime. I slipped through Eton unobserved; washed myself, and as far as possible adjusted my dress, at a little public-house in Windsor; and about eight o&apos;clock went down towards Pote&apos;s. On my road I met some junior boys, of whom I made inquiries. An Etonian is always a gentleman; and, in spite of my shabby habiliments, they answered me civilly. My friend Lord--was gone to the University of -. &quot;Ibi omnis effusus labor!&quot; I had, however, other friends at Eton; but it is not to all that wear that name in prosperity that a man is willing to present himself in distress. On recollecting myself, however, I asked for the Earl of D-, to whom (though my acquaintance with him was not so intimate as with some others) I should not have shrunk from presenting myself under any circumstances. He was still at Eton, though I believe on the wing for Cambridge. I called, was received kindly, and asked to breakfast.</p><p>Here let me stop for a moment to check my reader from any erroneous conclusions. Because I have had occasion incidentally to speak of various patrician friends, it must not be supposed that I have myself any pretension to rank and high blood. I thank God that I have not. I am the son of a plain English merchant, esteemed during his life for his great integrity, and strongly attached to literary pursuits (indeed, he was himself, anonymously, an author). If he had lived it was expected that he would have been very rich; but dying prematurely, he left no more than about 30,000 pounds amongst seven different claimants. My mother I may mention with honour, as still more highly gifted; for though unpretending to the name and honours of a LITERARY woman, I shall presume to call her (what many literary women are not) an INTELLECTUAL woman; and I believe that if ever her letters should be collected and published, they would be thought generally to exhibit as much strong and masculine sense, delivered in as pure &quot;mother English,&quot; racy and fresh with idiomatic graces, as any in our language--hardly excepting those of Lady M. W. Montague. These are my honours of descent, I have no other; and I have thanked God sincerely that I have not, because, in my judgment, a station which raises a man too eminently above the level of his fellow-creatures is not the most favourable to moral or to intellectual qualities.</p><p>Lord D- placed before me a most magnificent breakfast. It was really so; but in my eyes it seemed trebly magnificent, from being the first regular meal, the first &quot;good man&apos;s table,&quot; that I had sate down to for months. Strange to say, however, I could scarce eat anything. On the day when I first received my 10 pound bank- note I had gone to a baker&apos;s shop and bought a couple of rolls; this very shop I had two months or six weeks before surveyed with an eagerness of desire which it was almost humiliating to me to recollect. I remembered the story about Otway, and feared that there might be danger in eating too rapidly. But I had no need for alarm; my appetite was quite sunk, and I became sick before I had eaten half of what I had bought. This effect from eating what approached to a meal I continued to feel for weeks; or, when I did not experience any nausea, part of what I ate was rejected, sometimes with acidity, sometimes immediately and without any acidity. On the present occasion, at Lord D-&apos;s table, I found myself not at all better than usual, and in the midst of luxuries I had no appetite. I had, however, unfortunately, at all times a craving for wine; I explained my situation, therefore, to Lord D-, and gave him a short account of my late sufferings, at which he expressed great compassion, and called for wine. This gave me a momentary relief and pleasure; and on all occasions when I had an opportunity I never failed to drink wine, which I worshipped then as I have since worshipped opium. I am convinced, however, that this indulgence in wine contributed to strengthen my malady, for the tone of my stomach was apparently quite sunk, and by a better regimen it might sooner, and perhaps effectually, have been revived. I hope that it was not from this love of wine that I lingered in the neighbourhood of my Eton friends; I persuaded myself then that it was from reluctance to ask of Lord D-, on whom I was conscious I had not sufficient claims, the particular service in quest of which I had come down to Eton. I was, however unwilling to lose my journey, and--I asked it. Lord D-, whose good nature was unbounded, and which, in regard to myself, had been measured rather by his compassion perhaps for my condition, and his knowledge of my intimacy with some of his relatives, than by an over-rigorous inquiry into the extent of my own direct claims, faltered, nevertheless, at this request. He acknowledged that he did not like to have any dealings with money-lenders, and feared lest such a transaction might come to the ears of his connexions. Moreover, he doubted whether HIS signature, whose expectations were so much more bounded than those of -, would avail with my unchristian friends. However, he did not wish, as it seemed, to mortify me by an absolute refusal; for after a little consideration he promised, under certain conditions which he pointed out, to give his security. Lord D- was at this time not eighteen years of age; but I have often doubted, on recollecting since the good sense and prudence which on this occasion he mingled with so much urbanity of manner (an urbanity which in him wore the grace of youthful sincerity), whether any statesman--the oldest and the most accomplished in diplomacy--could have acquitted himself better under the same circumstances. Most people, indeed, cannot be addressed on such a business without surveying you with looks as austere and unpropitious as those of a Saracen&apos;s head.</p><p>Recomforted by this promise, which was not quite equal to the best but far above the worst that I had pictured to myself as possible, I returned in a Windsor coach to London three days after I had quitted it. And now I come to the end of my story. The Jews did not approve of Lord D-&apos;s terms; whether they would in the end have acceded to them, and were only seeking time for making due inquiries, I know not; but many delays were made, time passed on, the small fragment of my bank-note had just melted away, and before any conclusion could have been put to the business I must have relapsed into my former state of wretchedness. Suddenly, however, at this crisis, an opening was made, almost by accident, for reconciliation with my friends; I quitted London in haste for a remote part of England; after some time I proceeded to the university, and it was not until many months had passed away that I had it in my power again to revisit the ground which had become so interesting to me, and to this day remains so, as the chief scene of my youthful sufferings.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
And another item which for some time had not been pleasing Barney was that Larry Brainard had not yet]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/and-another-item-which-for-some-time-had-not-been-pleasing-barney-was-that-larry-brainard-had-not-yet</link>
            <guid>s2LyNnXkEwupHicG8Nes</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[been finally taken care of, either by the police or by that unofficial force to which he had given orders. So he had good reason for permitting himself the relaxation of scowling when he was not on public exhibition. But when Maggie, after reading the invitation, tossed it, together with a note from Dick, across to Barney without comment, the color of his entire world changed for that favorite son of Broadway. The surly gloom of the end of a profitless enterprise became magically an aurora bo...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been finally taken care of, either by the police or by that unofficial force to which he had given orders. So he had good reason for permitting himself the relaxation of scowling when he was not on public exhibition.</p><p>But when Maggie, after reading the invitation, tossed it, together with a note from Dick, across to Barney without comment, the color of his entire world changed for that favorite son of Broadway. The surly gloom of the end of a profitless enterprise became magically an aurora borealis of superior hopes:--no, something infinitely more substantial than any heaven-painting flare of iridescent colors.</p><p>&quot;Maggie, it&apos;s the real thing! At last!&quot; he cried.</p><p>&quot;What is it?&quot; asked Old Jimmie.</p><p>Barney gave him the letter. Jimmie read it through, then handed it back, slowly shaking his head.</p><p>&quot;I don&apos;t see nothing to get excited about,&quot; said the ever-doubtful, ever-hesitant Jimmie. &quot;It&apos;s only an invitation.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Aw, hell!&quot; ejaculated the exasperated Barney in disgust. &quot;If some one handed you a government bond all you could see would be a cigar coupon! That invitation, together with this note from Dick Sherwood saying he&apos;ll call and take Maggie out, means that the fish is all ready to be landed. Try to come back to life, Jimmie. If you knew anything at all about big-league society, you&apos;d know that sending invitations to meet the family--that&apos;s the way these swells do things when they&apos;re all set to do business. We&apos;re all ready for the killing-- the big clean-up!&quot;</p><p>He turned to Maggie. &quot;Great stuff, Maggie. I knew you could put it over. Of course you&apos;re going?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Of course,&quot; replied Maggie with a composure which was wholly of her manner.</p><p>A sudden doubt came out of this glory to becloud Barney&apos;s master mind. &quot;I don&apos;t know,&quot; he said slowly. &quot;It&apos;s one proposition to make one of these men swells believe that a woman is the real thing. And it&apos;s another proposition to put it over on one of these women swells. They&apos;ve got eyes for every little detail, and they know the difference between the genuine article and an imitation. I&apos;ve heard a lot about this Miss Sherwood; they say she&apos;s one of the cleverest of the swells. Think you can walk into her house and put it over on her, Maggie?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Of course--why not?&quot; answered Maggie, again with that composure which was prompted by her pride&apos;s desire to make Barney, and every one else, believe her equal to any situation.</p><p>Barney&apos;s animation returned. &quot;All right. If you think you can swing it, you can swing it, and the job&apos;s the same as finished and we&apos;re made!&quot;</p><p>Left to herself, and the imposing propriety and magnificent stupidity of Miss Grierson, Maggie made no attempt to keep up her appearance of confidence. All her thoughts were upon this opportunity which insisted upon looking to her like a menace. She tried to whip her self- confidence, of which she was so proud, into a condition of constant regnancy. But the plain fact was that Maggie, the misguided child of a stolen birthright, whose soaring spirit was striving so hard to live up to the traditions and conventions of cynicism, whose young ambition it was to outshine and surpass all possible competitors in this world in which she had been placed, who in her pride believed she knew so much of life--the plain fact was that Maggie was in a state bordering on funk.</p><p>This invitation from Miss Sherwood was an ordeal she had never counted on. She had watched the fine ladies at the millinery shop and while selling cigarettes at the Ritzmore, when she had been modeling her manners, and had believed herself just as fine a lady as they. But that had been in the abstract. Now she was face to face with a situation that was painfully concrete--a real test: she had to place herself into close contrast with, and under the close observation of, a real lady, and in that lady&apos;s own home. And in all her life she had not once been in a fine home! In fine hotels, yes--but fine hotels were the common refuge of butcher, baker, floor-walker, thief, swell, and each had approximately the same attention; and all she now felt she had really learned were a few such matters as the use of table silver and finger bowls.</p><p>It came to her that Barney, in his moment of doubt, had spoken more soundly than he had imagined when he had said that it was easier to fool a man about a woman than it was to fool a woman. How tragically true that was! While trying to learn to be a lady by working in smart shops, she had learned that the occasional man who had ventured in after woman&apos;s gear was hopelessly ignorant and bought whatever was skillfully thrust upon him, but that it was impossible to slip an inferior or unsuitable or out-dated article over on the woman who really knew.</p><p>And Miss Sherwood was the kind of woman who really knew! Who knew everything. Could she possibly, possibly pass herself off on Miss Sherwood as the genuine article? . . .</p><p>Could Larry have foreseen the very real misery--for any doubt of her own qualities, any fear of her ability to carry herself well in any situation, are among the most acute of a proud woman&apos;s miseries--which for some twenty-four hours was brought upon Maggie by the well-meant intrigue of which he was pulling the hidden strings, he might, because of his love for Maggie, have discarded his design even while he was creating it, and have sought a measure pregnant with less distress. But perhaps it was just as well that Larry did not know. Perhaps, even, it was just as well that he did not know what his grandmother knew.</p><p>Maggie&apos;s pride would not let her evade the risk; and her instinct for self-preservation dictated that she should reduce the risk to its minimum. So she wrote her acceptance--Miss Grierson attended to the phrasing of her note--but expressed her regret that she would be able to come only for the tea-hour. Drinking tea must be much the same, reasoned Maggie, whether it be drunk in a smart hotel or in a smart country home.</p><p>Maggie&apos;s native shrewdness suggested her simplest summer gown as likely to have committed the fewest errors, and the invaluable stupidity of Miss Grierson aided her toward correctness if not originality. When Dick came he was delighted with her appearance. On the way out he was ebulliently excited in his talk. Maggie averaged a fair degree of sensibility in her responses, though only her ears heard him. She was far more excited than he, and every moment her excitement mounted, for every moment she was speeding nearer the greatest ordeal of her life.</p><p>When at length they curved through the lawns of satin smoothness and Dick slowed down the car before the long white house, splendid in its simplicity, Maggie&apos;s excitement had added unto it a palpitant, chilling awe. And unto this was added consternation when, as they mounted the steps, Miss Sherwood smilingly crossed the piazza and welcomed her without waiting for an introduction. Maggie mumbled some reply; she later could not remember what it was. Indeed she never had met such a woman: so finished, so gracious, so unaffected, with a sparkle of humor in her brown eyes; and the rich plainness of her white linen frock made Maggie conscious that her own supposed simplicity was cheap and ostentatious. If Miss Sherwood had received her with hostility, doubt, or even chilled civility, the situation would have been easier; the aroused Maggie would then have made use of her own great endowment of hauteur and self-esteem. But to be received with this frank cordiality, on a basis of a equality with this finished woman--that left Maggie for the moment without arms. She had, in her high moments, believed herself an adventuress whose poise and plans nothing could unbalance. Now she found herself suddenly just a young girl of eighteen who didn&apos;t know what to do.</p><p>Had Maggie but known it that sudden unconscious confusion, which seemed to betray her, was really more effective for her purpose than would have been the best of conscious acting. It established her at once as an unstagey ingenue--simple, unspoiled, unacquainted with the formulas and formalities of the world.</p><p>Miss Sherwood, in her easy possession of the situation, banished Dick with &quot;Run away for a while, Dick, and give us two women a chance to get acquainted.&quot; She had caught Maggie&apos;s embarrassment, and led her to a corner of the veranda which looked down upon the gardens and the glistering Sound. She spoke of the impersonal beauties spread before their vision, until she judged that Maggie&apos;s first flutter had abated; then she led the way to wicker chairs beside a table where obviously tea was to be spread.</p><p>Miss Sherwood accepted Maggie for exactly what she seemed to be; and presently she was saying in a low voice, with her smiling, unoffending directness:</p><p>&quot;Excuse the liberty of an older woman, Miss Cameron--but I don&apos;t wonder that Dick likes you. You see, he&apos;s told me.&quot;</p><p>If Maggie had been at loss for her cue before, she had it now. It was unpretentiousness.</p><p>&quot;But, Miss Sherwood--I&apos;m so crude,&quot; she faltered, acting her best. &quot;Out West I never had any chances to learn. Not any chances like your Eastern girls.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That&apos;s no difference, my dear. You are a nice, simple girl--that&apos;s what counts!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Thank you,&quot; said Maggie.</p><p>&quot;So few of our rich girls of the East know what it is to be simple,&quot; continued Miss Sherwood. &quot;Too many are all affectation, and pose, and forwardness. At twenty they know all there is to be known, they are blasees--cynical--ready for divorce before they are ready for marriage. By contrast you are so wholesome, so refreshing.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Thank you,&quot; Maggie again murmured.</p><p>And as the two women sat there, sprung from the extremes of life, but for the moment on the level of equals, and as the older talked on, there grew up in Maggie two violently contradictory emotions. One was triumph. She had won out here, just as she had said she would win out; and won out with what Barney had declared to be the most difficult person to get the better of, a finished woman of the world. Indeed, that was triumph!</p><p>The other emotion she did not understand so well. And just then she could not analyze it. It was an unexpected dismay--a vague but permeating sickness--a dazed sense that she was being carried by unfamiliar forces toward she knew not what.</p><p>She held fast to her sense of triumph. That was the more apprehendable and positive; triumph was what she had set forth to win. This sense of triumph was at its highest, and she was resting in its elating security, when a car stopped before the house and a large man got out and started up the steps. From the first moment there was something familiar to Maggie in his carriage, but not till Miss Sherwood, who had risen and crossed toward him, greeted him as &quot;Mr. Hunt,&quot; did Maggie recognize the well-dressed visitor as the shabby, boisterous painter whom she had last seen down at the Duchess&apos;s.</p><p>Panic seized upon her. Miss Sherwood was leading him toward where she sat and his first clear sight of her would mean the end. There was no possible escape; she could only await her fate. And when she was denounced as a fraud, and her glittering victory was gone, she could only take herself away with as much of the defiance of admitted defeat as she could assume--and that wouldn&apos;t be much.</p><p>She gazed up at Hunt, whitely, awaiting extermination. Miss Sherwood&apos;s voice came to her from an infinite distance, introducing them. Hunt bowed, with a formally polite smile, and said formally, &quot;I&apos;m very glad to meet you, Miss Cameron.&quot;</p><p>Not till he and Miss Sherwood were seated and chatting did Maggie realize the fullness of the astounding fact that he had not recognized her. This was far more upsetting to her than would have been recognition and exposure; she had been all braced for that, but not for what had actually happened. She was certain he must have known her; nothing had really changed about her except her dress, and only a few weeks had passed since he had been seeing her daily down at the Duchess&apos;s, and since she had been his model, and he had studied every line and expression of her face with those sharp painter&apos;s eyes of his.</p><p>And so as the two chatted, she putting in a stumbling phrase when they turned to her, Maggie Carlisle, Maggie Cameron, Maggie Ellison, that gallant and all-confident adventuress who till the present had never admitted herself seriously disturbed by a problem, sat limply in her chair, a very young girl, indeed, and wondered how this thing could possibly be.</p><p>CHAPTER XXIV</p><p>Presently Miss Sherwood said something about tea, excused herself, and disappeared within the house. Maggie saw that Hunt watched Miss Sherwood till she was safely within doors; then she was aware that he was gazing steadily at her; then she saw him execute a slow, solemn wink.</p><p>Maggie almost sprang from her chair.</p><p>&quot;Shall we take a little stroll, Miss Cameron?&quot; Hunt asked. &quot;I think it will be some time before Miss Sherwood will want us for tea.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes--thank you,&quot; Maggie stammered.</p><p>Hunt led her down a walk of white gravel to where a circle of Hiawatha roses were trained into a graceful mosque, now daintily glorious with its solid covering of yellow-hearted red blooms. Within this retreat was a rustic bench, and on this Hunt seated her and took a place beside her. He looked her over with the cool, direct, studious eyes which reminded her of his gaze when he had been painting her.</p><p>&quot;Well, Maggie,&quot; he finally commented, &quot;you certainly look the part you picked out for yourself, and you seem to be putting it over. Always had an idea you could handle something big if you went after it. How d&apos;you like the life, being a swell lady crook?&quot;</p><p>She had hardly heard his banter. She needed to ask him no questions about his presence here; his ease of bearing had conveyed to her unconsciously from the first instant that her previous half- contemptuous estimate of him had been altogether wrong and that he was now in his natural element. Her first question went straight to the cause of her amazement.</p><p>&quot;Didn&apos;t you recognize me when you first saw me with Miss Sherwood?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Weren&apos;t you surprised?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Nope,&quot; he answered with deliberate monosyllabicness.</p><p>&quot;Why not?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I&apos;d been wised up that I&apos;d be likely to meet you--and here.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Here! By whom?&quot;</p><p>&quot;By advice of counsel I must decline to answer.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Why didn&apos;t you tell Miss Sherwood who I am and show me up?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Because I&apos;d been requested not to tell.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Requested by whom?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Maggie,&quot; he drawled, &quot;you seem to be making a go of this lady crook business--but I think you might have been even more of a shining light as a criminal cross-examiner. However, I refuse to be cross-examined further. By the way,&quot; he drawled on, &quot;how goes it with those dear souls, Barney and Old Jimmie?&quot;</p><p>She ignored his question.</p><p>&quot;Please! Who asked you not to tell?&quot;</p><p>There was a sudden glint of good-humored malice in his eyes. &quot;Mind if I smoke?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No.&quot;</p><p>He drew out a silver cigarette case and opened it. &quot;Empty!&quot; he exclaimed. &quot;Excuse me while I get something from the house to smoke. I&apos;ll be right back.&quot;</p><p>Without waiting for her permission he stepped out of the arbor and she heard his footsteps crunching up the gravel path. Maggie waited his return in pulsing suspense. Her situation had been developing beyond anything she had ever dreamed of; she was aquiver as to what might happen next. So absorbed was she in her chaos of feeling and thoughts that she did not even hear the humble symphony of the hundreds of bees drawing their treasure from the golden hearts of the roses; and did not see, across the path a score of yards away, the tall figure of Joe Ellison among the rosebushes, pruning-shears in hand, with which he had been cutting out dead blossoms, gazing at her with that hungry, admiring, speculative look with which he had regarded the young women upon the beach.</p><p>Presently she heard Hunt&apos;s footsteps coming down the path. Then she detected a second pair. Dick accompanying him, she thought. And then Hunt appeared before her, and was saying in his big voice: &quot;Miss Cameron, permit me to present my friend, Mr. Brandon.&quot; And then he added in a lowered voice, grinning with the impish delight of an overgrown boy who is playing a trick: &quot;Thought I&apos;d better go through the motions of introducing you people, so it would look as if you&apos;d just met for the first time.&quot; And with that he was gone.</p><p>Maggie had risen galvanically. For the moment she could only stare. Then she got out his name.</p><p>&quot;Larry!&quot; she whispered. &quot;You here?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes.&quot;</p><p>Astounded as she was, she had caught instantly the total lack of amazement on Larry&apos;s part.</p><p>&quot;You&apos;re--you&apos;re not surprised to see me?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No,&quot; he said evenly. &quot;I knew you were here. And before that I knew you were coming.&quot;</p><p>That was almost too much for Maggie. Hunt had known and Larry had known; both were people belonging to her old life, both the last people she expected to meet in such circumstances. She could only stare at him--entirely taken aback by this meeting.</p><p>And indeed it was a strangely different meeting from the last time she had seen him, at the Grantham; strangely different from those earlier meetings down at the Duchess&apos;s when both had been grubs as yet unmetamorphosized. Now standing in the arbor they looked a pair of weekend guests, in keeping with the place. For, as Maggie had noted, Larry in his well-cut flannels was as greatly transformed as Hunt.</p><p>It was Larry who ended the silence. &quot;Shall we sit down?&quot;</p><p>She mechanically sank to the bench, still staring at him.</p><p>&quot;What are you doing here?&quot; she managed to breathe.</p><p>&quot;I belong here.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Belong here?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I work here,&quot; he explained. &quot;I&apos;m called &apos;Mr. Brandon,&apos; but Miss Sherwood knows exactly who I am and what I&apos;ve been.&quot;</p><p>&quot;How long have you been here?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Since that night when Barney and Old Jimmie took you away to begin your new career--the same night that I ran away from those gunmen who thought I was a squealer, and from Casey and Gavegan.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And all the while that Barney and my father and the police have thought you hiding some place in the West, you&apos;ve been with the Sherwoods?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes. And I&apos;ve got to remain in hiding until something happens that will clear me. If the police or Barney and his friends learn where I am--you can guess what will happen.&quot;</p><p>She nodded.</p><p>&quot;Hunt got me here,&quot; he went on to explain. &quot;I&apos;m assisting in trying to get the Sherwood business affairs in better shape. I might as well tell you, Maggie,&quot; he added quietly, &quot;that Dick Sherwood is my very good friend.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Dick Sherwood!&quot; she breathed.</p><p>&quot;And I might as well tell you,&quot; he went on, &quot;that since that night at the Grantham when I heard his voice, I&apos;ve known that Dick is the sucker you and Barney and Old Jimmie are trying to trim.&quot;</p><p>She half rose, and her voice sounded sharply: &quot;Then you&apos;ve got me caught in a trap! You&apos;ve told them about me?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Why not?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Not so loud, or we may attract attention,&quot; he warned her. &quot;I haven&apos;t told because you had your chance to give me away to Barney that night at the Grantham. And you didn&apos;t give me away.&quot;</p><p>She sank slowly back to the bench. &quot;Is that your only reason?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No,&quot; he answered truthfully. &quot;Exposing you would merely mean that you&apos;d feel harder toward me--and harder toward every one else. I don&apos;t want that.&quot;</p><p>She pondered this a moment. &quot;Then--you&apos;re not going to tell?&quot;</p><p>He shook his head. &quot;I don&apos;t expect to. I want you to be free to decide what you&apos;re going to do--though I hope you&apos;ll decide not to go through with this thing you&apos;re doing.&quot;</p><p>She made no response. Larry had spoken with control until now, but his next words burst from him.</p><p>&quot;Don&apos;t you see what a situation it&apos;s put me in, Maggie--trying to play square with my friends, the Sherwoods, and trying to play square with you?&quot;</p><p>Again she did not answer.</p><p>&quot;Maggie, you&apos;re too good for what you&apos;re doing--it&apos;s all a terrible mistake!&quot; he cried passionately. Then he remembered himself, and spoke with more composure. &quot;Oh, I know there&apos;s not much use in talking to you now--while you feel as you do about yourself--and while you feel as you do about me. But you know I love you, and want to marry you-- when--&quot; He halted.</p><p>&quot;When?&quot; she prompted, almost involuntarily.</p><p>&quot;When you see things differently--and when I can go around the world a free man, not a fugitive from Barney and his gunmen and the police.&quot;</p><p>Again Maggie was silent for a moment. It was as if she were trying to press out of her mind what he had said about loving her. Truly this was, indeed, different from their previous meetings. Before, there had almost invariably been a defiant attitude, a dispute, a quarrel. Now she had no desire to quarrel.</p><p>Finally she said with an effort to be that self-controlled person which she had established as her model:</p><p>&quot;You seem to have your chance here to put over what you boasted to me about. You remember making good in a straight way.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes. And I shall make good--if only they will let me alone.&quot; He paused an instant. &quot;But I have no illusions about the present,&quot; he went on quietly. &quot;I&apos;m in quiet water for a time; I&apos;ve got a period of safety; and I&apos;m using this chance to put in some hard work. But presently the police and Barney and the others will learn where I am. Then I&apos;ll have all that fight over again--only the next time it&apos;ll be harder.&quot;</p><p>She was startled into a show of interest. &quot;You think that&apos;s really going to happen?&quot;</p><p>&quot;It&apos;s bound to. There&apos;s no escaping it. If for no other reason, I myself won&apos;t be able to stand being penned up indefinitely. Something will happen, I don&apos;t know what, which will pull me out into the open world--and then for me the deluge!&quot;</p><p>He made this prediction grimly. He was not a fatalist, but it had been borne in upon him recently that this thing was inescapable. As for him, when that time came, he was going to put up the best fight that was in him.</p><p>He caught the strained look which had come into Maggie&apos;s face, and it prompted him suddenly to lean toward her and say:</p><p>&quot;Maggie, do you still think I&apos;m a stool and a squealer?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I--&quot;</p><p>She broke off. She had a surging impulse to go on and say something to Larry. A great deal. She was not conscious of what that great deal was. She was conscious only of the impulse. There was too great a turmoil within her, begotten by the strain of her visit on Miss Sherwood and these unexpected meetings, for any motive, impulse, or decision to emerge to even a brief supremacy. And so, during this period when her brain would not operate, she let herself be swept on by the momentum of the forces which had previously determined her direction--her pride, her self-confidence, her ambition, the alliance of fortune between her and Barney and Old Jimmie.</p><p>They were sitting in this silence when footsteps again sounded on the gravel, and a shadow blotted the arbor floor.</p><p>&quot;Excuse me, Larry,&quot; said a man&apos;s voice.</p><p>&quot;Sure. What is it, Joe?&quot;</p><p>Before her Maggie saw the tall, thin man in overalls, his removed broad-brimmed hat revealing his white hair, whom she had noticed a little earlier working among the flowers. He held a bunch of the choicest pickings from the abundant rose gardens, their stems bound in maple leaves as temporary protection against their thorns. He was gazing at Maggie, respectful, hungry admiration in his somber eyes.</p><p>&quot;I thought perhaps the young lady might care for these.&quot; He held out the roses to her. And then quickly, to forestall refusal: &quot;I cut out more than we can use for the house. And I&apos;d like to have you have them.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Thank you,&quot; and Maggie took the flowers.</p><p>For an instant their eyes held. In every outward circumstance the event was a commonplace--this meeting of father and daughter, not knowing each other. It was hardly more than a commonplace to Maggie: just a tall, white-haired gardener respectfully offering her roses. And it was hardly more to Joe Ellison: just a tribute evoked by his hungry interest in every well-seeming girl of the approximate age of his daughter.</p><p>At the moment&apos;s end Joe Ellison had bowed and started back for his flower beds. &quot;Who is that man?&quot; asked Maggie, gazing after him. &quot;I never saw such eyes.&quot;</p><p>&quot;We used to be pals in Sing Sing,&quot; Larry replied. He went on to give briefly some of the details of Joe Ellison&apos;s story, never dreaming how he and Maggie were entangled in that story, nor how they were to be involved in its untanglement. Perhaps they were fortunate in this ignorance. Within the boundaries of what they did know life already held enough of problems and complications.</p><p>Larry had just finished his condensed history when Dick Sherwood appeared and ordered them to the veranda for tea. There were just the five of them, Miss Sherwood, Maggie, Hunt, Dick, and Larry. Miss Sherwood was as gracious as before, and she seemingly took Maggie&apos;s strained manner and occasional confusions as further proof of her genuineness. Dick beamed at the impression she was making upon his sister.</p><p>As for Maggie, she was living through the climax of that afternoon&apos;s strain. And she dared not show it. She forced herself to do her best acting, sipping her tea with a steady hand. And what made her situation harder was that two of the party, Larry and Hunt, were treating her with the charmed deference they might accord a charming stranger, when a word from either of them might destroy the fragile edifice of her deception.</p><p>At last it was over, and all was ready for her to start back to town with Dick. When Miss Sherwood kissed her and warmly begged her to come again soon, the very last of her control seemed to be slipping from her--but she held on. Larry and Hunt she managed to say goodbye to in the manner of her new acquaintanceship.</p><p>&quot;Isn&apos;t she simply splendid!&quot; exclaimed Miss Sherwood when Dick had stepped into the car and the two had started away.</p><p>Larry pretended not to have heard. He felt precariously guilty toward this woman who had befriended him. The next instant he had forgotten Miss Sherwood and his pulsing thoughts were all on Maggie in that speeding car. She had been profoundly shaken by that afternoon&apos;s experience, this much he knew. But what was going to be the real effect upon her of his carefully thought-out design? Was it going to be such as to save her and Dick?--and eventually win her for himself?</p><p>In the presence of Miss Sherwood Larry tried to behave as if nothing had happened more than the pleasant interruption of an informal tea: but beneath that calm all his senses were waiting breathless, so to speak, for news of what had happened within Maggie, and what might be happening to her.</p><p>CHAPTER XXV</p><p>When Maggie sped away from Cedar Crest in the low seat of the roadster beside the happy Dick, she felt herself more of a criminal than at any time in her life, and a criminal that miraculously was making her escape out of an inescapable set of circumstances.</p><p>Beyond her relief at this escape she did not know these first few minutes what she thought or felt. Too much had happened, and what had happened had all turned out so differently from what she had expected, for her to set in orderly array this chaos of reactions within herself and read the meaning of that afternoon&apos;s visit. She managed, with a great effort, to keep under control the outer extremities of her senses, and thus respond with the correct &quot;yes&quot; or &quot;no&quot; or &quot;indeed&quot; when some response from her was required by Dick&apos;s happy conversation.</p><p>Near Roslyn they swung off the turnpike into an unfrequented, shady road. Dick steered to one side beneath a locust-tree and silenced the motor.</p><p>&quot;Why are you stopping?&quot; she asked in sudden alarm.</p><p>&quot;So we can talk without a piece of impertinent machinery roaring interruptions at us,&quot; replied Dick with forced lightness. And then in a voice he could not make light: &quot;I want to talk to you about--about my sister. Isn&apos;t she splendid?&quot;</p><p>&quot;She is!&quot; There was no wavering of her thoughts as Maggie emphatically said this.</p><p>&quot;I&apos;m mighty glad you like her. She certainly liked you. She&apos;s all the family I&apos;ve got, and since you two hit it off so well together I hope- -I hope, Maggie--&quot;</p><p>And then Dick plunged into it, stammeringly, but earnestly. He told her how much he loved her, in old phrases that his boyish ardor made vibrantly new. He loved her! And if she would marry him, her influence would make him take the brace all his friends had urged upon him. She&apos;d make him a man! And she could see how pleased it would make his sister. And he would do his best to make Maggie happy--his very best!</p><p>The young super-adventuress--she herself had mentally used the word &quot;adventuress&quot; in thinking of herself, as being more genteel and mentally aristocratic than the cruder words by which Barney and Old Jimmie and their kind designated a woman accomplice--this young super- adventuress, who had schemed all this so adroitly, and worked toward it with the best of her brain and her conscious charm, was seized with new panic as she listened to the eager torrent of his imploring words, as she gazed into the quivering earnestness of his frank, blue-eyed face. She wished she could get out of the machine and run away or sink through the floor-boards of the car. For she really liked Dick.</p><p>&quot;I&apos;m--I&apos;m not so good as you think,&quot; she whispered. And then some unsuspected force within her impelled her to say: &quot;Dick, if you knew the truth--&quot;</p><p>He caught her shoulders. &quot;I know all the truth about you I want to know! You&apos;re wonderful, and I love you! Will you marry me? Answer that. That&apos;s all I want to know!&quot;</p><p>He had checked the confession that impulsively had surged toward her lips. Silent, her eyes wide, her breath coming sharply, she sat gazing at him. . . . And then from out the portion of her brain where were stored her purposes, and the momentum of her pride and determination, there flashed the realization that she had won! The thing that Barney and Old Jimmie had prepared and she had so skillfully worked toward, was at last achieved! She had only to say &quot;yes,&quot; and either of those two plans which Barney had outlined could at once be put in operation- -and there could be no doubt of the swift success of either. Dick&apos;s eager, trusting face was guarantee that there would come no obstruction from him.</p><p>She felt that in some strange way she had been caught in a trap. Yes, what they had worked for, they had won! And yet, in this moment of winning, as elements of her vast dizziness, Maggie felt sick and ashamed--felt a frenzied desire to run away from the whole affair. For Maggie, cynical, all-confident, and eighteen, was proving really a very poor adventuress.</p><p>&quot;Please, Maggie&quot;--his imploring voice broke in upon her--&quot;won&apos;t you answer me? You like me, don&apos;t you?--you&apos;ll marry me, won&apos;t you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I like you, Dick,&quot; she choked out--and it was some slight comfort to her to be telling this much of the truth--but--but I can&apos;t marry you.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Maggie!&quot; It was a cry of surprised pain, and the pain in his voice shot acutely into her. &quot;From the way you acted toward me--I thought--I hoped--&quot; He sharply halted the accusation which had risen to his lips. &quot;I&apos;m not going to take that answer as final, Maggie,&quot; he said doggedly. &quot;I&apos;m going to give you more time to think it over--more time for me to try. Then I&apos;ll ask you again.&quot;</p><p>That which prompted Maggie&apos;s response was a mixture of impulses: the desire, and this offered opportunity, to escape; and a faint reassertion of the momentum of her purpose. For with one such as Maggie, the set purposes may be seemingly overwhelmed, but death comes hard.</p><p>&quot;All right,&quot; she breathed rapidly. &quot;Only please get me back as quickly as you can. I&apos;m to have dinner with my--my cousin, and I&apos;ll be very late.&quot;</p><p>Dick drove her into the city in almost unbroken silence and left her at the great doors of the Grantham, abustle with a dozen lackeys in purple livery. She stood a moment and watched him drive away. He really was a nice boy--Dick.</p><p>As she shot up the elevator, she thought of a hitherto forgotten element of that afternoon&apos;s bewildering situation. Barney Palmer! And Barney was, she knew, now up in her sitting-room, impatiently waiting for her report of what he had good reason to believe would prove a successful experience. If she told the truth--that Dick had proposed, just as they had planned for him to do--and she had refused him--why, Barney--!</p><p>She seemed caught on every side!</p><p>Maggie got into her suite by way of her bedroom. She wanted time to gather her wits for meeting Barney. When Miss Grierson told her that her cousin was still waiting to take her to dinner, she requested her companion to inform Barney that she would be in as soon as she had dressed. She wasted all the time she legitimately could in changing into a dinner-gown, and when at length she stepped into her sitting- room she was to Barney&apos;s eye the same cool Maggie as always.</p><p>Barney rose as she entered. He was in smart dinner jacket; these days Barney was wearing the smartest of everything that money could secure. There was a shadow of impatience on his face, but it was instantly dissipated by Maggie&apos;s self-composed, direct-eyed beauty.</p><p>&quot;How&apos;d you come out with Miss Sherwood?&quot; he whispered eagerly.</p><p>&quot;Well enough for her to kiss me good-bye, and beg me to come again.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I&apos;ve got to hand it to you, Maggie! You&apos;re sure some swell actress-- you&apos;ve sure got class!&quot; His dark eyes gleamed on her with half a dozen pleasures: admiration of what she was in herself--admiration of what she had just achieved--anticipation of results, many results-- anticipation of what she was later to mean to him in a personal way. &quot;If you can put it over on a swell like Miss Sherwood, you can put it over on any one!&quot; He exulted. &quot;As soon as we clean up this job in hand, we&apos;ll move on to one big thing after another!&quot;</p><p>And then out came the question Maggie had been bracing herself for: &quot;How about Dick Sherwood? Did he finally come across with that proposal?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No,&quot; Maggie answered steadily.</p><p>&quot;No? Why not?&quot; exclaimed Barney sharply. &quot;I thought that was all that was holding him back--waiting for his sister to look you over and give you her O.K.?&quot;</p><p>Maggie had decided that her air of cool, indifferent certainty was the best manner to use in this situation with Barney. So she shrugged her white shoulders.</p><p>&quot;How can I tell what makes a man do something, and what makes him not do it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;But did he seem any less interested in you than before?&quot; Barney pursued.</p><p>&quot;No,&quot; replied Maggie.</p><p>&quot;Then maybe he&apos;s just waiting to get up his nerve. He&apos;ll ask you, all right; nothing there for us to worry about. Come on, let&apos;s have dinner. I&apos;m starved.&quot;</p><p>On the roof of the Grantham they were excellently served; for Barney knew how to order a dinner, and he knew the art, which is an alchemistic mixture of suave diplomacy and the insinuated power and purpose of murder, of handling head-waiters and their sub-autocrats. Having no other business in hand, Barney devoted himself to that business which ran like a core through all his businesses--paying court to Maggie. And when Barney wished to be a courtier, there were few of his class who could give a better superficial interpretation of the role; and in this particular instance he was at the advantage of being in earnest. He forced the most expensive tidbits announced by the dinner card upon Maggie; he gallantly and very gracefully put on and removed, as required by circumstances, the green cobweb of a scarf Maggie had brought to the roof as protection against the elements; and when he took the dancing-floor with her, he swung her about and hopped up and down and stepped in and out with all the skill of a master of the modern perversion of dancing. Barney was really good enough to have been a professional dancer had his desires not led him toward what seemed to him a more exciting and more profitable career.</p><p>Maggie, not to rouse Barney&apos;s suspicions, played her role as well as he did his own. And most of the other diners, a fraction of the changing two or three hundred thousand people from the South and West who choose New York as the best of all summer resorts, gazed upon this handsome couple with their intricate steps which were timed with such effortless and enviable accuracy, and excitedly believed that they were beholding two distinguished specimens of what their home papers persisted in calling New York&apos;s Four Hundred.</p><p>Maggie got back to her room with the feeling that she had staved off Barney and her numerous other dilemmas for the immediate present. Her chief thought in the many events of the day had been only to escape her dangers and difficulties for the moment; all the time she had known that her real thinking, her real decisions, were for a later time when she was not so driven by the press of unexpected circumstances. That less stressful time was now beginning.</p><p>What was she to do next? What were to be her final decisions? And what, in all this strange ferment, was likely to germinate as possible forces against her?</p><p>She mulled these things over for several days, during which Dick came to see her twice, and twice proposed, and was twice put off. She had quiet now, and was most of the time alone, but that clarity which she had expected, that quickness and surety of purpose which she had always believed to be unfailingly hers, refused to come.</p><p>She tried to have it otherwise, but the outstanding figure in her meditations was Larry. Larry, who had not exposed her at the Sherwoods&apos;, and whose influence had caused Hunt also not to expose her--Larry, who without deception was on a familiar footing at the Sherwoods&apos; where she had been received only through trickery--Larry, a fugitive in danger from so many enemies, perhaps after all undeserved enemies--Larry, who looked to be making good on his boast to achieve success through honesty--Larry, who had again told her that he loved her. She liked Dick Sherwood--she really did. But Larry--that was something different.</p><p>And thus she thought on, drawn this way and that, and unable to reach a decision. But with most people, when in a state of acute mental turmoil, that which has been most definite in the past, instinct, habit of mind, purpose, tradition, becomes at least temporarily the dominant factor through the mere circumstance that it has existed powerfully before, through its comparative stability, through its semi-permanence. And so with Maggie. She had for that one afternoon almost been won over against herself by the workings of Larry&apos;s secret diplomacy. Then had come the natural reaction. And now in her turmoil, in so far as she had any decision, it was instinctively to go right ahead in the direction in which she had been going.</p><p>But on the sixth day of her uncertainty, just after Dick had called on her and she had provisionally accepted an invitation to Cedar Crest for the following afternoon, a danger which she had half seen from the start burst upon her without a moment&apos;s warning. It came into her sitting-room, just before her dinner hour, in the dual form of Barney and Old Jimmie. The faces of both were lowering.</p><p>&quot;Get rid of that boob chaperon of yours!&quot; gritted Barney. &quot;We&apos;re going to have some real talk!&quot;</p><p>Maggie stepped to the connecting door, sent Miss Grierson on an inconsequential errand, and returned.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
On the following day, according to a plan that had been worked out between Larry and Miss Sherwood]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/on-the-following-day-according-to-a-plan-that-had-been-worked-out-between-larry-and-miss-sherwood</link>
            <guid>hWfV9Fre2ANuBZLE6NsM</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Joe Ellison appeared at Cedar Crest and was given the assistant gardener&apos;s cottage which stood apart on the bluff some three hundred yards east of the house. He was a tall, slightly bent, white-haired man, apparently once a man of physical strength and dominance of character and with the outer markings of a gentleman, but now seemingly a mere shadow of the forceful man of his prime. As a matter of fact, Joe Ellison had barely escaped that greatest of prison scourges, tuberculosis. The ro...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Ellison appeared at Cedar Crest and was given the assistant gardener&apos;s cottage which stood apart on the bluff some three hundred yards east of the house. He was a tall, slightly bent, white-haired man, apparently once a man of physical strength and dominance of character and with the outer markings of a gentleman, but now seemingly a mere shadow of the forceful man of his prime. As a matter of fact, Joe Ellison had barely escaped that greatest of prison scourges, tuberculosis.</p><p>The roses were given over to his care. For a few brief years during the height of his prosperity he had owned a small place in New Jersey and during that period had seemingly been the country gentleman. Flowers had been his hobby; so that now he could have had no work which would have more suited him than this guardianship of the roses. For himself he desired no better thing than to spend what remained of his life in this sunlit privacy and communion with growing things.</p><p>He gripped Larry&apos;s hand when they were first alone in the little cottage. &quot;Thanks, Larry; I&apos;ll not forget this,&quot; he said. He said little else. He did not refer to his prison life, or what had gone before it. He had never asked Larry, even while in prison together, about Larry&apos;s previous activities and associates; and he asked no questions now. Apparently it was the desire of this silent man to have the bones of his own past remain buried, and to leave undisturbed the graves of others&apos; mistakes.</p><p>A retiring, unobtrusive figure, he settled quickly to his work. He seemed content, even happy; and at times there was a far-away, exultant look in his gray eyes. Miss Sherwood caught this on several occasions; it puzzled her, and she spoke of it to Larry. Larry understood what lay behind Joe&apos;s bearing, and since the thing had never been told to him as a secret he retold that portion of Joe&apos;s history he had recited to the Duchess: of a child who had been brought up among honorable people, protected from the knowledge that her father was a convict--a child Joe never expected to see and did not even know how to find.</p><p>Joe Ellison became a figure that moved Miss Sherwood deeply: content to busy himself in his earthly obscurity, ever dreaming and gloating over his one great sustaining thought--that he had given his child the best chance which circumstances permitted; that he had removed himself from his child&apos;s life; that some unknown where out in the world his child was growing to maturity among clean, wholesome people; that he never expected to make himself known to his child. The situation also moved Larry profoundly whenever he looked at his old friend, merging into a kindly fellowship with the earth.</p><p>But while busy with new affairs at Cedar Crest, Larry was all the while thinking of Maggie, and particularly of his own dilemma regarding Maggie and Dick. But the right plan still refused to take form in his brain. However, one important detail occurred to him which required immediate attention. If his procedure in regard to Hunt&apos;s pictures succeeded in drawing the painter from his hermitage, nothing was more likely than that Hunt unexpectedly would happen upon Maggie in the company of Dick Sherwood. That might be a catastrophe to Larry&apos;s unformed plan; it had to be forestalled if possible. Such a matter could not be handled in a letter, with the police opening all mail coming to the Duchess&apos;s house. So once more he decided upon a secret visit to the Duchess&apos;s house. He figured that such a visit would be comparatively without risk, since the police and Barney Palmer and the gangsters Barney had put upon his trail all still believed him somewhere in the West.</p><p>Accordingly, a few nights after they had settled at Cedar Crest, he motored into New York in a roadster Miss Sherwood had placed at his disposal, and after the necessary precautions he entered Hunt&apos;s studio. The room was dismantled, and Hunt sat among his packed belongings smoking his pipe.</p><p>&quot;Well, young fellow,&quot; growled Hunt after they had shaken hands, &quot;you see you&apos;ve driven me from my happy home.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Then Mr. Graham has been to see you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes. And he put up to me your suggestion about a private exhibition. And I fell for it. And I&apos;ve got to go back among the people I used to know. And wear good clothes and put on a set of standardized good manners. Hell!&quot;</p><p>&quot;You don&apos;t like it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I suppose, if the exhibition is a go, I&apos;ll like grinning at the bunch that thought I couldn&apos;t paint. You bet I&apos;ll like that! You, young fellow--I suppose you&apos;re here to gloat over me and to try to collect your five thousand.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I never gloat over doing such an easy job as that was. And I&apos;m not here to collect my bet. As far as money is concerned, I&apos;m here to give you some.&quot; And he handed Hunt the check made out to &quot;cash&quot; which Mr. Graham had sent him for the Italian mother.</p><p>&quot;Better keep that on account of what I owe you,&quot; advised Hunt.</p><p>&quot;I&apos;d rather you&apos;d hold it for me. And better still, I&apos;d rather call the bet off in favor of a new bargain.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What&apos;s the new proposition for swindling me?&quot;</p><p>&quot;You need a business nursemaid. What commission do you pay dealers?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Been paying those burglars forty per cent.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That&apos;s too much for doing nothing. Here&apos;s my proposition. Give me ten per cent to act as your personal agent, and I&apos;ll guarantee that your total percentage for commissions will be less than at present, and that your prices will be doubled. Of course I can&apos;t do much while the police and others are so darned interested in me, so if you accept we&apos;ll just date the agreement from the time I&apos;m cleared.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You&apos;re on, son--and we&apos;ll just date the agreement from the present moment, A.D.&quot; Again Hunt gripped Larry&apos;s hand. &quot;You&apos;re all to the good, Larry--and I&apos;m not giving you half enough.&quot;</p><p>That provided Larry with the opening he had desired. &quot;You can make it up to me.&quot;</p><p>&quot;How?&quot;</p><p>&quot;By helping me out with a proposition of my own. To come straight to the point, it&apos;s Maggie.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Maggie?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I guess you know how I feel there. She&apos;s got a wrong set of ideas, and she&apos;s fixed in them--and you know how high-spirited she is. She&apos;s out in the world now, trying to put something crooked over which she thinks is big. I know what it is. I want to stop her, and change her. That&apos;s my big aim--to change her. The only way I can at this moment stop what she is now doing is by exposing her. And mighty few people with a wrong twist are ever set right by merely being exposed.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I guess you&apos;re right there, Larry.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What I want is a chance to try another method on Maggie. If she&apos;s handled right I think she may turn out a very different person from what she seems to be--something that may surprise both of us.&quot;</p><p>Hunt nodded. &quot;That was why I painted her picture. Since I first saw her I&apos;ve been interested in how she was going to come out. She might become anything. But where do I fit in?&quot;</p><p>&quot;She&apos;s flying in high company. It occurred to me that, when you got back to your own world, you might meet her, and in your surprise you might speak to her in a manner which would be equivalent in its effect to an intentional exposure. I wanted to put you on your guard and to ask you to treat her as a stranger.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That&apos;s promised. I won&apos;t know her.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Don&apos;t promise till you know the rest.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What else is there to know?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Who the sucker is they&apos;re trying to trim.&quot; Larry regarded the other steadily. &quot;You know him. He&apos;s Dick Sherwood.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Dick Sherwood!&quot; exploded Hunt. &quot;Are you sure about that?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I was with Maggie the other night when Dick came to have supper with her; he didn&apos;t see me. Besides, Dick has told me about her.&quot;</p><p>&quot;How did they ever get hold of Dick?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Dick&apos;s the easiest kind of fish for two such smooth men as Barney and Old Jimmie when they&apos;ve got a clever, good-looking girl as bait, and when they know how to use her. He&apos;s generous, easily impressed, thinks he is a wise man of the world and is really very gullible.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Have they got him hooked?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Hard and fast. It won&apos;t be his fault if they don&apos;t land him.&quot;</p><p>The painter gazed at Larry with a hard look. Then he demanded abruptly:</p><p>&quot;Show Miss Sherwood that picture of Maggie I painted?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No. I had my reasons.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What you going to do with it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Keep it, and pay you your top price for it when I&apos;ve got the money.&quot;</p><p>&quot;H&apos;m! Told Miss Sherwood what&apos;s doing about Dick?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Why not?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I thought of doing it, then I decided against it. For the same reason I just gave you--that it might lead to exposure, and that exposure would defeat my plans.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You seem to be forgetting that your plan leaves Dick in danger. Dick deserves some consideration.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And I&apos;m giving it to him,&quot; argued Larry. &quot;I&apos;m thinking of him as much as of Maggie. Or almost as much. His sister and friends have pulled him out of a lot of scrapes. He&apos;s not a bit wiser or better for that kind of help. And it&apos;s not going to do him any good whatever to have some one step in and take care of him again. He&apos;s been a good friend to me, but he&apos;s a dear fool. I want to handle this so he&apos;ll get a jolt that will waken him up--make him take his responsibilities more seriously--make him able to take care of himself.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Huh!&quot; grunted Hunt. &quot;You&apos;ve certainly picked out a few man-sized jobs for yourself: to make a success of the straight life for yourself--to come out ahead of the police and your old pals--to make Maggie love the Ten Commandments--to put me across--to make Dick into a level- headed citizen. Any other little item you&apos;d like to take on?&quot;</p><p>Larry ignored the irony of the question. &quot;Some of those things I&apos;m going to do,&quot; he said confidently. &quot;And any I see I&apos;m going to fail in, I&apos;ll get warning to the people involved. But to come back to your promise: are you willing to give your promise now that you know all the facts?&quot;</p><p>Hunt pulled for a long moment at his pipe. Then he said almost gruffly:</p><p>&quot;I guess you&apos;ve guessed that Isabel Sherwood is about the most important person in the world to me?&quot;</p><p>That was the nearest Hunt had ever come to telling that he loved Miss Sherwood. Larry nodded.</p><p>&quot;I&apos;m in bad there already. Suppose your foot slips and everything about Dick goes wrong. What&apos;ll be my situation when she learns I&apos;ve known all along and have just stood by quietly and let things happen? See what I&apos;ll be letting myself in for?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I do,&quot; said Larry, his spirits sinking. &quot;And of course I can understand your decision not to give your promise.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Who said I wouldn&apos;t give my promise?&quot; demanded Hunt. &quot;Of course I give my promise! All I said was that the weather bureau of my bad toe predicts that there&apos;s likely to be a storm because of this--and I want you to use your brain, son, I want you to use your brain!&quot;</p><p>He upreared his big, shag-haired figure and gripped Larry&apos;s hand. &quot;You&apos;re all right, Larry--and here&apos;s wishing you luck! Now get to hell out of here before Gavegan and Casey drop in for a cup of tea, or your old friends begin target practice with their hip artillery. I want a little quiet in which to finish my packing.</p><p>&quot;And say, son,&quot; he added, as he pushed Larry through the door, &quot;don&apos;t fall dead at the sight of me when you see me next, for I&apos;m likely to be walking around inside all the finery and vanity of Fifth Avenue.&quot;</p><p>CHAPTER XXI</p><p>Larry came down the stairway from Hunt&apos;s studio in a mood of high elation. Through Hunt&apos;s promise of cooperation he had at least made a start in his unformed plan regarding Maggie. Somehow, he&apos;d work out and put across the rest of it.</p><p>Then Hunt&apos;s prediction of the trouble that might rise through his silence recurred to Larry. Indeed, that was a delicate situation!-- containing all kinds of possible disasters for himself as well as for Hunt. He would have to be most watchful, most careful, or he would find himself entangled in worse circumstances than at present.</p><p>As he came down into the little back room, his grandmother was sitting over her interminable accounts, each of which represented a little profit to herself, some a little relief to many, some a tragedy to a few; and many of which were in code, for these represented transactions of a character which no pawnshop, particularly one reputed to be a fence, wishes ever to have understood by those presumptive busy-bodies, the police. When Larry had first entered, she had merely given him an unsurprised &quot;good-evening&quot; and permitted him to pass on. But now, as he told her good-night and turned to leave, she said in her thin, monotonous voice:</p><p>&quot;Sit down for a minute, Larry. I want to talk to you.&quot;</p><p>Larry obeyed. &quot;Yes, grandmother.&quot;</p><p>But the Duchess did not at once speak. She held her red-rimmed, unblinking eyes on him steadily. Larry waited patiently. Though she was so composed, so self-contained, Larry knew her well enough to know that what was passing in her mind was something of deep importance, at least to her.</p><p>At length she spoke. &quot;You saw Maggie that night you hurried away from here?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes, grandmother. Have you heard from her since the?--or from Barney or Old Jimmie?&quot;</p><p>The Duchess shook her head. &quot;Do you mind telling me what happened that night--and what Maggie&apos;s doing?&quot;</p><p>Larry told her of the scene in Maggie&apos;s suite at the Grantham, told of the plan in which Maggie was involved and of his own added predicament. This last the Duchess seemingly ignored.</p><p>&quot;Just about what I supposed she was doing,&quot; she said. &quot;And you tried again to get her to give it up?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And she refused?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes.&quot; And he added: &quot;Refused more emphatically than before.&quot;</p><p>The Duchess studied him a long moment. Then: &quot;You&apos;re not trying to make her give that up just because you think she&apos;s worth saving. You like her a lot, Larry?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I love her,&quot; Larry admitted.</p><p>&quot;I&apos;m sorry about that, Larry.&quot; There was real emotion in the old voice now. &quot;I&apos;ve told you that you&apos;re all I&apos;ve got left. And now that you&apos;ve at last started right, I want everything to go right with you. Everything! And Maggie will never help things go right with you. Your love for her can only mean misery and misfortune. You can&apos;t change her.&quot;</p><p>Larry came out with the questions he had asked himself so frequently these last days. &quot;But why did her manner change so when she heard Barney and the others? Why did she help me escape?&quot;</p><p>&quot;That was because, deep down, she really loves you. That&apos;s the worst part of it: you both love each other.&quot; The Duchess slowly nodded her head. &quot;You both love each other. If it wasn&apos;t for that I wouldn&apos;t care what you tried to do. But I tell you again you can&apos;t change her. She&apos;s too sure of herself. She&apos;ll always try to make you go <em>her way</em>--and if you don&apos;t, you&apos;ll never get a smile from her. And because you love each other, I&apos;m afraid you&apos;ll give in and go her way. That&apos;s what I&apos;m afraid of. Won&apos;t you just cut her out of your life, Larry?&quot;</p><p>It had been a prodigiously long speech for the Duchess. And Larry realized that the emotion behind it was a thousand times what showed in the thin voice of the bent, gestureless figure.</p><p>&quot;For your sake I&apos;m sorry, grandmother. But I can&apos;t.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Then it&apos;s only fair to tell you, Larry,&quot; she said in a more composed tone which expressed a finality of decision, &quot;that if there&apos;s ever anything I can do to stop this, I&apos;ll do it. For she&apos;s bad for you-- what with her stiff spirit--and the ideas Old Jimmie has put into her--and the way Old Jimmie has brought her up. I&apos;ll stop things if I can.&quot;</p><p>Larry made no reply. The Duchess continued looking at him steadily for a long space. He knew she was thinking; and he was wondering what was passing through that shrewd old brain, when she remarked:</p><p>&quot;By the way, Larry, I just remembered what you told me of that old Sing Sing friend--Joe Ellison. Have you heard from him recently?&quot;</p><p>&quot;He&apos;s out, and he&apos;s working where I am.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes? What&apos;s he doing?&quot;</p><p>&quot;He&apos;s working there as a gardener.&quot;</p><p>Again she was silent a space, her sunken eyes steady With thought. Then she said:</p><p>&quot;From the time he was twenty till he was thirty I knew Joe Ellison well--better than I&apos;ve ever told you. He knew your mother when she was a girl, Larry. I wish you&apos;d ask him to come in to see me. As soon as he can manage it.&quot;</p><p>Larry promised. His grandmother said no more about Maggie, and presently Larry bade her good-night and made his cautious way, ever on the lookout for danger, to where he had left his roadster, and thence safely out to Cedar Crest. But the Duchess sat for hours exactly as he had left her, her accounts unheeded, thinking, thinking, thinking over an utterly impossible possibility that had first presented itself faintly to her several days before. She did not see how the thing could be; and yet somehow it might be, for many a strange thing did happen in this border world where for so long she had lived. When finally she went to bed she slept little; her busy conjectures would not permit sleep. And though the next day she went about her shop seemingly as usual, she was still thinking.</p><p>That night Joe Ellison came. They met as though they had last seen each other but yesterday.</p><p>&quot;Good-evening, Joe.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Glad to see you, Duchess.&quot;</p><p>She held out to him a box of the best cigars, which she had bought against his coming, for she had remembered Joe Ellison&apos;s once fastidious taste regarding tobacco. He lit one, and they fell into the easy silence of old friends, taking up their friendship exactly where it had been broken off. As a matter of fact, Joe Ellison might have been her son-in-law but for her own firm attitude. He had known her daughter very much better than her words to Larry the previous evening had indicated. Not only had Joe known her while a girl down here, but much later he had learned in what convent she was going to school and there had been surreptitious love-making despite convent rules and boundaries--till the Duchess had learned what was going on. She had had a square out-and-out talk with Joe; the romance had suddenly ended; and later Larry&apos;s mother had married elsewhere. But the snuffed-out romance had made no difference in the friendship between the Duchess and Joe; each had recognized the other as square, as that word was understood in their border world.</p><p>To Joe Ellison the Duchess was changed but little since twenty-odd years ago. She had seemed old even then; though as a youth he had known old men who had talked of her beauty when a young woman and of how she had queened it among the reckless spirits of that far time. But to the Duchess the change in Joe Ellison was astounding. She had last seen him in his middle thirties: black-haired, handsome, careful of dress, powerful of physique, dominant, fiery-tempered, fearless of any living thing, but with these hot qualities checked into a surface appearance of unruffled equanimity by his self-control and his habitual reticence. And now to see him thin, white-haired, bent, his old fire seemingly burned to gray ashes--the Duchess, who had seen much in her generations, was almost appalled at the transformation.</p><p>At first the Duchess skillfully guided the talk among commonplaces.</p><p>&quot;Larry tells me you&apos;re out with him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes,&quot; said Joe. &quot;Larry&apos;s been a mighty good pal.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What&apos;re you going to do when you get back your strength?&quot;</p><p>&quot;The same as I&apos;m doing now--if they&apos;ll let me.&quot;</p><p>And after a pause: &quot;Perhaps later, if I had the necessary capital, I&apos;d like to start a little nursery. Or else grow flowers for the market.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Not going back to the old thing, then?&quot;</p><p>Joe shook his white head. &quot;I&apos;m all through there. Flowers are a more interesting proposition.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Whenever you get ready to start, Joe, you can have all the capital you want from me. And it will cost you nothing. Or if you&apos;d rather pay, it&apos;ll cost you the same as at a bank--six per cent.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Thanks. I&apos;ll remember.&quot; Joe Ellison could not have spoken his gratitude more strongly.</p><p>The Duchess now carefully guided the talk in the direction of the thing of which she had thought so constantly.</p><p>&quot;By the way, Joe, Larry told me something about you I&apos;d never heard before--that you had been married, and had a child.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes. You didn&apos;t hear because I wasn&apos;t telling anybody about it when it happened, and it never came out.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Mind telling me about it, Joe?&quot;</p><p>He pulled at his perfecto while assembling his facts; and then he made one of the longest speeches Joe Ellison--&quot;Silent Joe&quot; some of his friends had called him in the old days--was ever known to utter. But there was reason for its length; it was an epitome of the most important period of his life.</p><p>&quot;I had a nice little country place over in Jersey for three or four years. It all happened there. No one knew me for what I was; they took me for what I pretended to be, a small capitalist whose interests required his taking occasional trips. Nice neighbors. That&apos;s where I met my wife. She was fine every way. That&apos;s why I kept all that part of my life from my pals; I was afraid they might leak and the truth would spoil everything. My wife was an orphan, niece of the widow of a broker who lived out there. She never knew the truth about me. She died when the baby was born. When the baby was a year and a half my big smash came, and I went up the river. But I was never connected up with the man who lived over in Jersey and who suddenly cancelled his lease and moved away.&quot;</p><p>The Duchess drew nearer to the heart of her thoughts.</p><p>&quot;Was the baby a boy or girl, Joe?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Girl.&quot;</p><p>The Duchess did not so much as blink. &quot;How old would she be by this time?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Eighteen.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What was her name?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Mary--after her mother. But of course I ordered it to be changed. I don&apos;t know what her name is now.&quot;</p><p>The Duchess pressed closer.</p><p>&quot;What became of her, Joe?&quot;</p><p>A glow began to come into the somber eyes of Joe Ellison. &quot;I told you her mother was a fine woman, and she never knew anything bad about me. I wanted my girl to grow up like her mother. I wanted her to have as good a chance as any of those nice girls over in Jersey--I wanted her never to know any of the lot I&apos;ve known--I wanted her never to have the stain of knowing her father was a crook--I wanted her never to know even who her father was.&quot;</p><p>&quot;How did you manage it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Her mother had left a little fortune, about twenty-five thousand-- twelve or fifteen hundred a year. I turned the money and the girl over to my best pal--and the squarest pal a man ever had--the only one I&apos;d let know about my Jersey life. I told him what to do. She was an awfully bright little thing; at a year and a half, when I saw her last, she was already talking. She was to be brought up among nice, simple people--go to a good school--grow up to be a nice, simple girl. And especially never to know anything about me. She was to believe herself an orphan. And my pal did just as I ordered. He wrote me how she was getting on till about four years ago, then I had news that he was dead and that the trust fund had been transferred to a firm of lawyers, though I wasn&apos;t given the name of the lawyers. That doesn&apos;t make any difference since she&apos;s getting the money just the same.</p><p>&quot;What was your pal&apos;s name, Joe?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Jimmie Carlisle.&quot;</p><p>The Duchess had been certain what this name would be, but nevertheless she could not repress a start.</p><p>&quot;What&apos;s the matter?&quot; Joe asked sharply. &quot;Did you know him?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Not in those days,&quot; said the Duchess, recovering her even tone. &quot;Though I got to know him later. By the way,&quot; she added casually, &quot;did Jimmie Carlisle have any children of his own?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Not before I went away. He wasn&apos;t even married.&quot;</p><p>There was now no slightest doubt left in the Duchess&apos;s mind. Maggie was really Joe Ellison&apos;s daughter.</p><p>Joe Ellison went on, the glow of his sunken eyes becoming yet more exalted. He was almost voicing his thoughts to himself alone, for his friendship with the Duchess was so old that her presence was no inhibition. His low words were almost identical in substance with what Larry had told--a summary of what had come to be his one great hope and dream, the nearest thing he had to a religion.</p><p>&quot;Somewhere, in a nice place, my girl is now growing up like her mother. Clean of everything I was and I knew. She must be practically a woman now. I don&apos;t know where she is--there&apos;s now no way for me to learn. And I don&apos;t want to know. And I don&apos;t want her ever to know about me. I don&apos;t ever want to be the cause of making her feel disgraced, or of dragging her down from among the people where she belongs.&quot;</p><p>The Duchess gave no visible sign of emotion, but her ancient heart- strings were set vibrating by that tense, low-pitched voice. She had a momentary impulse to tell him the truth. But just then the Duchess was a confusion of many conflicting impulses, and the balance of their strength was for the moment against telling. So she said nothing.</p><p>Their talk drifted back to commonplaces, and presently Joe Ellison went away. The Duchess sat motionless at her desk, again thinking-- thinking--thinking; and when Joe Ellison was back in his gardener&apos;s cottage at Cedar Crest and was happily asleep, she still sat where he had left her. During her generations of looking upon life from the inside, she had seen the truth of many strange situations of which the world had learned only the wildest rumors or the most respectable versions; but during the long night hours, perhaps because the affair touched her so closely, this seemed to her the strangest situation she had ever known. A father believing with the firm belief of established certainty that his daughter had been brought up free from all taint of his own life, carefully bred among the best of people. In reality the girl brought up in a criminal atmosphere, with criminal ideas implanted in her as normal ideas, and carefully trained in criminal ways and ambitions. And neither father nor daughter having a guess of the truth.</p><p>Indeed it was a strange situation! A situation charged with all kinds of unforeseeable results.</p><p>The Duchess now understood the unfatherly disregard Old Jimmie had shown for the ordinary welfare of Maggie. Not being her father, he had not cared. Superficially, at least, Jimmie Carlisle must have been a much more plausible individual twenty years earlier, to have won the implicit trust of Joe Ellison and to have become his foremost friend. She understood one reason why Old Jimmie had always boarded Maggie in the cheapest and lowest places; his hidden cupidity had thereby been pocketing about a thousand dollars a year of trust money for over sixteen years.</p><p>But there was one queer problem here to which the Duchess could not at this time see the answer. If Jimmie Carlisle had wished to gratify his cupidity and double-cross his friend, why had he not at the very start placed Maggie in an orphanage where she would have been neither charge nor cost to him, and thus have had the use of every penny of the trust fund? Why had he chosen to keep her by him, and train her carefully to be exactly what her father had most wished her not to be? There must have been some motive in the furtive, tortuous mind of Old Jimmie, that now would perhaps forever remain a mystery.</p><p>Of course she saw, or thought she saw, the reason for the report of Old Jimmie&apos;s death to Joe Ellison. That report had been sent to escape an accounting.</p><p>As she sat through the night hours the Duchess for the first time felt warmth creep over her for Maggie. She saw Maggie in the light of a victim. If Maggie had been brought up as her father had planned, she might now be much the girl her father dreamed her. But Old Jimmie had entered the scheme of things. Yes, the audacious, willful, confident Maggie, bent on conquering the world in the way Old Jimmie and later Barney Palmer had taught her, was really just a poor misguided victim who should have had a far different fate.</p><p>And now the Duchess came to one of the greatest problems of her life. What should she do? Considering the facts that Joe Ellison wished the life of a recluse and desired to avoid all talk of the old days, the chances were that he would never happen upon the real state of affairs. Only she and Old Jimmie knew the essentials of the situation- -and very likely Jimmie did not yet know that the friend who had once trusted him was now a free man. She felt as though she held in her hands the strings of destiny. Should she tell the truth?</p><p>She pondered long. All her considerations were given weight according to what she saw as their possible effect upon Larry; for Larry was the one person left whom she loved, and on him were fixed the aspirations of these her final years. Therefore her thoughts and arguments were myopic, almost necessarily specious. She wanted to see justice done, of course. But most of all she wanted what was best for Larry. If she told the truth, it might result in some kind of temporary breakdown in Maggie&apos;s attitude which would bring her and Larry together. That would be disastrous. If not disastrous at once, certainly in the end. Maggie was a victim, and undoubtedly deserved sympathy. But others should not be sacrificed merely because Maggie had suffered an injury. She had been too long under the tutelage of Old Jimmie, and his teachings were now too thoroughly the fiber of her very being, for her to alter permanently. She might change temporarily under the urge of an emotional revelation; but she would surely revert to her present self. There was no doubt of that.</p><p>And the Duchess gave weight to other considerations--all human, yet all in some measure specious. Joe Ellison was happy in his dream, and would be happy in it all the rest of his life. Why tell the truth and destroy his precious illusion?--especially when there was no chance to change Maggie?</p><p>And further, she recalled the terrific temper that had lived within the composed demeanor of Joe Ellison. The fires of that temper could not yet be all burned out. If she told the truth, told that Jimmie Carlisle was still alive, that might be just touching the trigger of a devastating tragedy--might be disaster for all. What would be the use when no one would have been benefited?</p><p>And so, in the wisdom of her old head and the entanglements of her old heart, the Duchess decided she would never tell. And that loving, human decision she was to cling to through the stress of times to come.</p><p>But even while she was thus deciding upon a measure to checkmate them both, Larry was pacing his room at Cedar Crest, at last excitedly evolving the elusive plan which was to bring Maggie to her senses and also to him; and Maggie, all unconscious of this new element which had entered as a potential factor in her existence, all unconscious of how far she had been guided from the course which had been charted for her, was lying awake at the Grantham after a late party at which Dick Sherwood had been her escort, and was exulting pridefully over the seemingly near consummation of the plan that was to show Larry Brainard how wrong he was and that was to establish her as the cleverest woman in her line--better even than Barney or Old Jimmie believed her.</p><p>And thus separate wills each strove to direct their own lives and other lives according to their own separate plans; little thinking to what extent they were all entangled in a common destiny; and thinking not at all of the further seed that was being sown for the harvest- time of the whirlwind.</p><p>CHAPTER XXII</p><p>After Larry&apos;s many days and nights of futile searching of his brain for a plan that would accord with his fundamental idea for awakening the unguessed other self of Maggie, the plan, which finally came to him complete in all its details in a single moment, was so simple and obvious that he marveled it could have been plainly before his eyes all this while without his ever seeing it. Of course the plan was dangerous and of doubtful issue. It had to be so, because it involved the reactions of strong-tempered persons as yet unacquainted who would have no foreknowledge of the design behind their new relationship; and because its success or failure, which might also mean his own complete failure, the complete loss of all he had thus far gained, depended largely upon the twist of events which he could not foresee and therefore could not guide.</p><p>Briefly, his plan was so to manage as to have Maggie received in the Sherwood household as a guest, to have her receive the frank, unquestioning hospitality (and perhaps friendship) of such a gracious, highly placed, unpretentious woman as Miss Sherwood, so distinctly a native of, and not an immigrant to, the great world. To be received as a friend by those against whom she plotted, to have the generous, unsuspecting friendship of Miss Sherwood--if anything just then had a chance to open the blinded Maggie&apos;s eyes to the evil and error of what she was engaged upon, if anything had a chance to appeal to the finer things he believed to exist unrecognized or suppressed in Maggie, this was that thing.</p><p>And best part of this plan, its effect would be only within Maggie&apos;s self. No one need know that anything had happened. There would be no exposure, no humiliation.</p><p>Of course there was the great question of how to get Miss Sherwood to invite Maggie; and whether indeed Miss Sherwood would invite her at all. And there was the further question, the invitation being sent, of whether Maggie would accept.</p><p>Larry decided to manipulate his design through Dick Sherwood. Late that afternoon, when Dick, just returned from the city, dropped into, as was his before-dinner custom, the office-study which had been set aside for Larry&apos;s use, Larry, after an adroit approach to his subject, continued:</p><p>&quot;And since I&apos;ve been wished on you as a sort of step-uncle, there&apos;s something I&apos;d like to suggest--if I don&apos;t seem to be fairly jimmying my way into your affairs.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Door&apos;s unlocked and wide open, Captain,&quot; said Dick. &quot;Walk right in and take the best chair.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Thanks. Remember telling me about a young woman you recently met? A Miss Maggie--Maggie--&quot;</p><p>&quot;Miss Cameron,&quot; Dick prompted. &quot;Of course I remember.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And remember your telling me that this time it&apos;s the real thing?&quot;</p><p>&quot;And it IS the real thing!&quot;</p><p>&quot;You haven&apos;t--excuse me--asked her to marry you yet?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No. I&apos;ve been trying to get up my nerve.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Here&apos;s where you&apos;ve got to excuse me once more, Dick--it&apos;s not my business to tell you what should be your relations with your family-- but have you told your sister?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No.&quot; Dick hesitated. &quot;I suppose I should. But I hadn&apos;t thought of it- -yet. You see--&quot; Again Dick hesitated.</p><p>&quot;Yes?&quot; prompted Larry.</p><p>&quot;There are her relatives--that cousin and uncle. I guess it must have been my thinking of them that prevented my thinking of what you suggest.&quot;</p><p>&quot;But you told me they hadn&apos;t interfered much, and never would interfere.&quot; Larry gently pressed his point: &quot;And look at it from Miss Cameron&apos;s angle of view. If it&apos;s the real thing, and you&apos;re behaving that way toward her, hasn&apos;t she good grounds for thinking it strange that you haven&apos;t introduced her to your family?&quot;</p><p>&quot;By George, you&apos;re right, Captain! I&apos;ll see to that at once.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Of course, Dick,&quot; Larry went on, carefully feeling his way, &quot;you know much better than I the proper way to do such things--but don&apos;t you think it would be rather nice, when you tell your sister, that you suggest to her that she invite Miss Cameron out here for a little visit? If they are to meet, I know Miss Cameron, or any girl, would take it as more of a tribute to be received in your own home than merely to meet in a big commonplace hotel.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Right again, Captain! I&apos;d tell Isabel to-night, and ask her to send the invitation--only I&apos;m booked to scoot right back to the city for a little party as soon as I get some things together, and I&apos;ll stay overnight in the apartment. But I&apos;ll attend to the thing to-morrow night, sure.&quot;</p><p>&quot;May I ask just one favor in the meantime?&quot;</p><p>&quot;One favor? A dozen, Captain!&quot;</p><p>&quot;I&apos;ll take the other eleven later. Just now I only ask, since you haven&apos;t proposed, that you won&apos;t--er--commit yourself any further, in any way, with Miss Cameron until after you&apos;ve told your sister and until after Miss Cameron has been out here.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, I say now!&quot; protested Dick.</p><p>&quot;I am merely suggesting that affairs remain in statu quo until after Miss Cameron&apos;s visit with your sister. That&apos;s not asking much of you, Dick--nor asking it for a very long time.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, of course I&apos;ll do it, Captain,&quot; grumbled Dick affectionately. &quot;You&apos;ve got me where I&apos;ll do almost anything you want me to do.&quot;</p><p>But Dick did not speak to his sister the following evening. The next morning news came to Miss Sherwood of a friend&apos;s illness, and she and her novel-reading aunt hurried off at once on what was to prove to be a week&apos;s absence. But this delay in his plan did not worry Larry greatly as it otherwise would have done, for Dick repeated his promise to hold a stiff rein upon himself until after he should have spoken to his sister. And Larry believed he could rely upon Dick&apos;s pledged word.</p><p>During this week of waiting and necessary inactivity Larry concentrated upon another phase of his many-sided plan--to make of himself a business success. As has been said, he saw his chance of this in the handling of Miss Sherwood&apos;s affairs; and saw it particularly in an idea that had begun to grow upon him since he became aware, through statements and letters from the agents turned over to him, of the extent of the Sherwood real-estate holdings and since he had got some glimmering of their condition. His previous venturings about the city had engendered in him a sense of moderate security; so he now began to make flying trips into New York in the smart roadster Miss Sherwood had placed at his disposal.</p><p>On each trip Larry made swift visits to several of the properties, until finally he had covered the entire list Miss Sherwood had furnished him through the agents. His survey corroborated his surmise. The property, mostly neglected apartment and tenement houses, was in an almost equally bad way whether one regarded it from the standpoint of sanitation, comfort, or cold financial returns. The fault for this was due to the fact that the Sherwoods had left the property entirely in the care of the agents, and the agents, being old, old-fashioned, and weary of business to the point of being almost ready to retire, had left the property to itself.</p><p>Prompted by these bad conditions, and to some degree by the then critical housing famine, with its records of some thousands of families having no place at all to go and some thousands of families being compelled for the sake of mere shelter to pay two and three times what they could afford for a few poor rooms, and with its records of profiteering landlords, Larry began to make notes for a plan which he intended later to elaborate--a plan which he tentatively entitled: &quot;Suggestions for the Development of Sherwood Real-Estate Holdings.&quot; Larry, knowing from the stubs of Miss Sherwood&apos;s checkbook what would be likely to please her, gave as much consideration to Service as to Profit. The basis of his growing plan was good apartments at fair rentals. That he saw as the greatest of public services in the present crisis. But the return upon the investment had to be a reasonable one. Larry did not believe in Charity, except for extreme cases. He believed, and his belief had grown out of a wide experience with many kinds of people, that Charity, of course to a smaller extent, was as definitely a source of social evil as the then much-talked-of Profiteering.</p><p>In the meantime he was seeing his old friend, Joe Ellison, every day; perhaps smoking with Ellison in his cottage after he had finished his day&apos;s work among the roses, perhaps walking along the bluff which hung above the Sound, whose cool, clear waters splashed with vacation laziness upon the shingle. The two men rarely spoke, and never of the past. Larry was well acquainted with, and understood, the older man&apos;s deep-rooted wish to avoid all talk bearing upon deeds and associates of other days; that was a part of his life and a phase of existence that Joe Ellison was trying to forget, and Larry by his silence deferred to his friend&apos;s desire.</p><p>On the day after Joe Ellison&apos;s visit to the Duchess, Larry had received a note from his grandmother, addressed, of course, to &quot;Mr. Brandon.&quot; There was no danger in her writing Larry if she took adequate precautions: mail addressed to Cedar Crest was not bothered by postal and police officials; it was only mail which came to the house of the Duchess which received the attention of these gentlemen.</p><p>The note was one which the Duchess, after that night of thought which had so shaken her old heart, had decided to be a necessity if her plan of never telling of her discovery of Maggie&apos;s real paternity were to be a success. The major portion of her note dwelt upon a generality with which Larry already was acquainted: Joe&apos;s desire to keep clear of all talk touching upon the deeds and the people of his past. And then in a careless-seeming last sentence the Duchess packed the carefully calculated substance of her entire note:</p><p>&quot;It may not be very important--but particularly avoid ever mentioning the mere name of Jimmie Carlisle. They used to know each other, and their acquaintance is about the bitterest thing Joe Ellison has to remember.&quot;</p><p>Of course he&apos;d never mention Old Jimmie Carlisle, Larry said to himself as he destroyed the note--never guessing, in making this natural response to what seemed a most natural request, that he had become an unconscious partner in the plan of the warm-hearted, scheming Duchess.</p><p>There was one detail of Joe Ellison&apos;s behavior which aroused Larry&apos;s mild curiosity. Directly beneath one of Joe&apos;s gardens, hardly a hundred yards away, was a bit of beach and a pavilion which were used in common by the families from the surrounding estates. The girls and younger women were just home from schools and colleges, and at high tide were always on the beach. At this period, whenever he was at Cedar Crest, Larry saw Joe, his work apparently forgotten, gazing fixedly down upon the young figures splashing about the water in their bright bathing-suits or lounging about the pavilion in their smart summer frocks.</p><p>This interest made Larry wonder, though to be sure not very seriously. For he had never a guess of how deep Joe&apos;s interest was. He did not know, could not know, that that tall, fixed figure, with its one absorbing idea, was thinking of his daughter. He could not know that Joe Ellison, emotionally elated and with a hungry, self-denying affection that reached out toward them all, was seeing his daughter as just such a girl as one of these--simple, wholesome, well-brought-up. He could not know that Joe, in a way, perceived his daughter in every nice young woman he saw.</p><p>Toward evening of the seventh day of her visit, Miss Sherwood returned. Larry was on the piazza when the car bearing her swept into the white-graveled curve of the drive. The car was a handsome, powerful roadster. Larry had started out to be of such assistance as he could, when the figure at the wheel, a man, sprang from the car and helped Miss Sherwood alight. Larry saw that the man was Hunt--such a different Hunt!--and he had begun a quick retreat when Hunt&apos;s voice called after him:</p><p>&quot;You there--wait a minute! I want a little chin-chin with you.&quot;</p><p>Larry halted. He could not help overhearing the few words that passed between Hunt and Miss Sherwood.</p><p>&quot;Thank you ever so much,&quot; she said in her even voice. &quot;Then you&apos;re coming?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I promised, didn&apos;t I?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Then good-bye.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Good-bye.&quot;</p><p>They shook hands friendly enough, but rather formally, and Miss Sherwood turned to the house. Hunt called to Larry:</p><p>&quot;Come here, son.&quot;</p><p>Larry crossed to the big painter who was standing beside the power- bulged hood of his low-swung car.</p><p>&quot;Happened to drop in where she was--brought her home--aunt following in that hearse with its five-foot cushions she always rides in,&quot; Hunt explained. And then: &quot;Well, I suppose you&apos;ve got to give me the once-over. Hurry up, and get it done with.&quot;</p><p>Larry obeyed. Hunt&apos;s wild hair had been smartly barbered, he had on a swagger dust-coat, and beneath it flannels of the smartest cut. Further, he bore himself as if smart clothes and smart cars had always been items of his equipment.</p><p>&quot;Well, young fellow, spill it,&quot; he commanded. &quot;What do I look like?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Like Solomon in all his glory. No, more like the he-dressmaker of the Queen of Sheba.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I&apos;m going to run you up every telephone post we come to for that insult! Hop in, son, and we&apos;ll take a little voyage around the earth in eighty seconds.&quot;</p><p>Larry got in. Once out of the drive the car leaped away as though intent upon keeping to Hunt&apos;s time-table. But after a mile or two Hunt quieted the roaring monster to a conversational pace.</p><p>&quot;Get one of the invitations to my show?&quot; he asked.</p><p>&quot;Yes. Several days ago. That dealer certainly got it up in great shape.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You must have hypnotized Graham. That old paint pirate is giving the engine all the gas she&apos;ll stand--and believe me, he&apos;s sure getting up a lot of speed.&quot; Hunt grinned. &quot;That private pre-exhibition show you suggested is proving the best publicity idea Graham ever had in his musty old shop. Everywhere I go, people are talking about the darned thing. Every man, woman and child, also unmarried females of both sexes, who got invitations are coming--and those who didn&apos;t get &apos;em are trying to bribe the traffic cop at Forty-Second Street to let &apos;em in.&quot;</p><p>Hunt paused for a chuckle. &quot;And I&apos;m having the time of my young life with the people who always thought I couldn&apos;t paint, and who are now trying to sidle up to me on the suspicion that possibly after all I can paint. What&apos;s got that bunch buffaloed is the fact that Graham has let it leak out that I&apos;m likely to make bales of money from my painting. The idea of any one making money out of painting, that&apos;s too much for their heads. Oh, this is the life, Larry!&quot;</p><p>Larry started to congratulate him, but was instantly interrupted with:</p><p>&quot;I admit I&apos;m a painter, and always will admit it. But this present thing is all your doing. We&apos;ll try to square things sometime. But I didn&apos;t ask you to come along to hear verbostical acrobatics about myself. I asked you to learn if you&apos;d worked out your plan yet regarding Maggie? &quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes.&quot; And Larry proceeded to give the details of his design.</p><p>&quot;Regular psychological stuff!&quot; exclaimed Hunt. And then: &quot;Say, you&apos;re some stage-manager! Or rather same playwright! Playwrights that know tell me it&apos;s one of their most difficult tricks--to get all their leading characters on the stage at the same time. And here you&apos;ve got it all fixed to bring on Miss Sherwood, Dick, Maggie, yourself, and the all-important me--for don&apos;t forget I shall be slipping out to Cedar Crest occasionally.&quot;</p><p>&quot;As for myself,&quot; remarked Larry, &quot;I shall remain very much behind the scenes. Maggie&apos;ll never see me.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Well, here&apos;s hoping you&apos;re good enough playwright to manage your characters so they won&apos;t run away from you and mix up an ending you never dreamed of!&quot;</p><p>The car paused again in the drive and Larry got out.</p><p>&quot;I say, Larry,&quot; Hunt whispered eagerly, &quot;who&apos;s that tall, white-haired man working over there among the roses?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Joe Ellison. He&apos;s that man I told you about my getting to know in Sing Sing. Remember?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, yes! The crook who was having his baby brought up to be a real person. Say, he&apos;s a sure-enough character! Lordy, but I&apos;d love to paint that face! . . . So-long, son.&quot;</p><p>The car swung around the drive and roared away. Larry mounted to the piazza. Dick was waiting for him, and excitedly drew him down to one corner that crimson ramblers had woven into a nook for confidences.</p><p>&quot;Captain, old scout,&quot; he said in a low, happy voice, &quot;I&apos;ve just told sis. Put the whole proposition up to her, just as you told me. She took it like a regular fellow. Your whole idea was one hundred per cent right. Sis is inside now getting off that invitation to Miss Cameron, asking her to come out day after to-morrow.&quot;</p><p>Larry involuntarily caught the veranda railing. &quot;I hope it works out-- for the best,&quot; he said.</p><p>&quot;Oh, it will--no doubt of it!&quot; cried the exultant Dick. &quot;And, Captain, if it does, it&apos;ll be all your doing!&quot;</p><p>CHAPTER XXIII</p><p>When Miss Sherwood&apos;s invitation reached Maggie, Barney and Old Jimmie were with her. The pair had growled a lot, though not directly at Maggie, at the seeming lack of progress Maggie had made during the past week. Barney was a firm enough believer in his rogue&apos;s creed of first getting your fish securely hooked; but, on the other hand, there was the danger, if the hooked fish be allowed to remain too long in the water, that it would disastrously shake itself free of the barb and swim away. That was what Barney was afraid had been happening with Dick Sherwood. Therefore he was thinking of returning to his abandoned scheme of selling stock to Dick. He might get Dick&apos;s money in that way, though of course not so much money, and of course not so safely.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[I was referring to work in his recent manner.]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/i-was-referring-to-work-in-his-recent-manner</link>
            <guid>ucHplCToDiB53Nd0Dtju</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA["He has not been doing any work recently," corrected Mr. Graham. "No?" Larry picked up the Italian mother which for this occasion he had mounted with thumb-tacks upon a drawing-board, and stood it upon a chair in the most advantageous light. "There is a little thing in Mr. Hunt&apos;s recent manner which I lately purchased." Mr. Graham regarded the painting long and critically. Finally he remarked: "At least it is different." "Different and better," said Larry with his quiet positiveness. "So...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;He has not been doing any work recently,&quot; corrected Mr. Graham.</p><p>&quot;No?&quot; Larry picked up the Italian mother which for this occasion he had mounted with thumb-tacks upon a drawing-board, and stood it upon a chair in the most advantageous light. &quot;There is a little thing in Mr. Hunt&apos;s recent manner which I lately purchased.&quot;</p><p>Mr. Graham regarded the painting long and critically.</p><p>Finally he remarked:</p><p>&quot;At least it is different.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Different and better,&quot; said Larry with his quiet positiveness. &quot;So much better that I paid him three thousand dollars for it.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Three thousand!&quot; The dealer regarded Larry sharply. &quot;Three thousand for that?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes. And I consider that I got a bargain.&quot;</p><p>Mr. Graham was silent for several moments. Then he said &quot;For what reason have I been asked here?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I want you to undertake to sell this picture.&quot;</p><p>&quot;For how much?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Five thousand dollars.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Five thousand dollars!&quot;</p><p>&quot;It is easily worth five thousand,&quot; Larry said quietly.</p><p>&quot;If you value it so highly, why do you want to sell?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I am pressed by the present money shortage. Also I secured a second picture when I got this one. That second picture I shall not sell. You should have no difficulty in selling this,&quot; Larry continued, &quot;if you handle the matter right. Think of how people have started again to talk about Gaugin: about his starting to paint in a new manner down there in the Marquesas Islands, of his trading a picture for a stick of furniture or selling it for a few hundred francs--which same paintings are now each worth a small fortune. Capitalize this Gaugin talk; also the talk about poor mad Blakeslie. You&apos;ve got a new sensation. One all your own.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You can&apos;t start a sensation with one painting,&quot; Mr. Graham remarked dryly.</p><p>This had been the very remark Larry had adroitly been trying to draw from the dealer.</p><p>&quot;Why, that&apos;s so!&quot; he exclaimed. And then as if the thought had only that moment come to him: &quot;Why not have an exhibition of paintings done in his new manner? He&apos;s got a studio full of things just as characteristic as this one.&quot;</p><p>Larry caught the gleam which came into the dealer&apos;s eyes. It was instantly masked.</p><p>&quot;Too late in the spring for a picture show. Couldn&apos;t put on an exhibition before next season.&quot;</p><p>&quot;But why not have a private pre-exhibition showing?&quot; Larry argued-- &quot;with special invitations sent to a small, carefully chosen list, putting it over strong to them that you were offering them the chance of a first and exclusive view of something very remarkable. Most of them will feel flattered and will come. And that will start talk and stir up interest in your public exhibition in the fall. That&apos;s the idea!&quot;</p><p>Again there was the gleam, quickly masked, in the dealer&apos;s eyes. But Larry got it.</p><p>&quot;How do I know this picture here isn&apos;t just an accident?--the only one of the sort Mr. Hunt has ever painted, or ever will paint?&quot; cautiously inquired Mr. Graham. &quot;You said you had a second picture. May I see it?&quot;</p><p>Larry hesitated. But he believed he had the dealer almost &quot;sold&quot;; a little more and Mr. Graham would be convinced. So he brought in Maggie&apos;s portrait. The dealer looked it over with a face which he tried to keep expressionless.</p><p>&quot;How much is this one?&quot; he asked at length.</p><p>&quot;It is not for sale.&quot;</p><p>&quot;It will bring more money than the other. It&apos;s a more interesting subject.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That&apos;s why I&apos;m keeping it,&quot; said Larry. &quot;I think you&apos;ll admit, Mr. Graham, that this proves that Mr. Hunt is not now painting accidents.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You&apos;re right.&quot; The mask suddenly dropped from Mr. Graham&apos;s face; he was no longer merely an art merchant; he was also an art enthusiast. &quot;Hunt has struck something bold and fresh, and I think I can put him over. I&apos;ll try that scheme you mentioned. Tell me where I can find him and I&apos;ll see him at once.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That picture has got to be sold before I give you his address. No use seeing him until then; he&apos;d laugh at you, and not listen to anything. He&apos;s sore at the world; thinks it doesn&apos;t understand him. An actual sale would be the only argument that would have weight with him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;All right--I&apos;ll buy the picture myself. Hunt and I have had a falling out, and I&apos;d like him to have proof that I believe in him.&quot; Again Mr. Graham was the art merchant. &quot;Though, of course, I can&apos;t pay the five thousand you ask. Hunt&apos;s new manner may catch on, and it may not. It&apos;s a big gamble.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What will you pay?&quot;</p><p>&quot;What you paid for it--three thousand.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That&apos;s an awful drop from what I expected. When can you pay it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I&apos;ll send you my check by an assistant as soon as I get back to my place.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I told you I was squeezed financially--so the picture is yours. I&apos;ll send you Mr. Hunt&apos;s present address when I receive your check. Make it payable to &apos;cash.&apos;&quot;</p><p>When Mr. Graham had gone with the Italian mother--it was then the very end of the afternoon--Larry wondered if his plan to draw Hunt out of his hermitage was going to succeed; and wondered what would be the result, if any, upon the relationship between Hunt and Miss Sherwood if Hunt should come openly back into his world an acclaimed success, and come with the changed attitude toward every one and every thing that recognition bestows.</p><p>But something was to make Larry wonder even more a few minutes later. Dick, that habitual late riser, had had to hurry away that morning without speaking to him. Now, when he came home toward six o&apos;clock, Dick shouted cheerily from the hallway:</p><p>&quot;Ahoy! Where you anchored, Captain Nemo?&quot;</p><p>Larry did not answer. He sat over his papers as one frozen. He knew now whose had been the elusively familiar voice he had heard outside Maggie&apos;s door. It was Dick Sherwood&apos;s.</p><p>Dick paused without to take some messages from Judkins, and Larry&apos;s mind raced feverishly. Dick Sherwood was the victim Maggie and Barney and Old Jimmie were so cautiously and elaborately trying to trim! It seemed an impossible coincidence. But no, not impossible, after all. Their net had been spread for just such game: a young man, impressionable, pleasure-loving, with plenty of money, and with no strings tied to his spending of it. That Barney should have made his acquaintance was easily explained; to establish acquaintance with such persons as Dick was Barney&apos;s specialty. What more natural than that the high-spirited, irresponsible Dick should fall into this trap?--or indeed that he should have been picked out in advance as the ideal victim and have been drawn into it?</p><p>&quot;Hello, there!&quot; grumbled Dick, entering. &quot;Why didn&apos;t you answer a shipmate&apos;s hail?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I heard you; but just then I was adding a column of figures, and I knew you&apos;d look in.&quot;</p><p>At that moment Larry noted the portrait of Maggie, looking up from the chair beside him. With a swiftness which he tried to disguise into a mechanical action, he seized the painting and rolled it up, face inside.</p><p>&quot;What&apos;s that you&apos;ve got?&quot; demanded Dick.</p><p>&quot;Just a little daub of my own.&quot;</p><p>&quot;So you paint, too. What else can you do? Let&apos;s have a look.&quot;</p><p>&quot;It&apos;s too rotten. I&apos;d rather let you see something else--though all my stuff is bad.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You wouldn&apos;t do any little thing, would you, to brighten this tiredest hour in the day of a tired business man,&quot; complained Dick. &quot;I&apos;ve really been a business man to-day, Captain. Worked like the devil--or an angel--whichever works the harder.&quot;</p><p>He lit a cigarette and settled with a sigh on the corner of Larry&apos;s desk. Larry regarded him with a stranger and more contradicting mixture of feelings than he had ever thought to contain: solicitude for Dick--jealousy of him--and the instinct to protect Maggie. This last seemed to Larry grotesquely absurd the instant it seethed up in him, but there the instinct was: was Dick treating Maggie right?</p><p>&quot;How was the show last night, Dick?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Punk!&quot;</p><p>&quot;I thought you said you were to see &apos;The Jest.&apos; I&apos;ve heard it&apos;s one of the best things for years.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, I guess the show&apos;s all right. But the company was poor. My company, I mean. The person I wanted to see couldn&apos;t come.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Hope you had a supper party that made up for the disappointment,&quot; pursued Larry, adroitly trying to lead him on.</p><p>&quot;I sure had that, Captain!&quot;</p><p>Dick slid to a chair beside Larry, dropped a hand on Larry&apos;s knee, and said in a lowered tone:</p><p>&quot;Captain, I&apos;ve recently met a new girl--and believe me, she&apos;s a knock- out!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Better keep clear of those show girls, Dick.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Never again! The last one cured me for life. Miss Cameron--Maggie Cameron, how&apos;s that for a name?--is no Broadway girl, Captain. She&apos;s not even a New York girl.&quot;</p><p>&quot;No?&quot;</p><p>&quot;She&apos;s from some place out West. Father owned several big ranches. She says that explains her crudeness. Her crude? I should say not! They don&apos;t grow better manners right here in New York. And she&apos;s pretty, and clever, and utterly naive about everything in New York. Though I must say,&quot; Dick added, &quot;that I&apos;m not so keen about her cousin and her uncle. I&apos;d met the cousin a few times the last year or two around town; he belongs here. The two are the sort of poor stock that crops out in every good family. They&apos;ve got one merit, though: they don&apos;t try to impose on her too much.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What is your Miss Cameron doing in New York?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Having her first look at the town before going to some resort for the summer; perhaps taking a cottage somewhere. I say, Captain&quot;--leaning closer--&quot;I wish you didn&apos;t feel you had to stick around this apartment so tight. I&apos;d like to take you out and introduce you to her.&quot;</p><p>Larry could imagine the resulting scene if ever this innocently proposed introduction were given.</p><p>&quot;I guess that for the present I&apos;ll have to depend upon your reports, Dick.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Well, you can take it from me that she&apos;s just about all right!&quot;</p><p>It was Larry&apos;s strange instinct to protect Maggie that prompted his next remark:</p><p>&quot;You&apos;re not just out joy-riding, are you, Dick?&quot;</p><p>Dick flushed. &quot;Nothing of that sort. She&apos;s not that kind of girl. Besides--I think it&apos;s the real thing, Captain.&quot;</p><p>The honest look in Dick&apos;s eyes, even more than his words, quieted Larry&apos;s fear for Maggie. Presently Dick walked out leaving Larry yet another problem added to his life. He could not let anything happen to Maggie. He could not let anything happen to Dick. He had to protect each; he had to do something. Yet what could he do?</p><p>Yes, this certainly was a problem! He paced the room, another victim of the ancient predicament of divided and antagonistic duty.</p><p>CHAPTER XIX</p><p>The night of Larry&apos;s unexpected call upon her at the Grantham, Maggie had pulled herself together and aided by the imposing Miss Grierson had done her best as ingenue hostess to her pseudo-cousin, Barney, and her pseudo-uncle, Old Jimmie, and to their quarry, Dick Sherwood, whom they were so cautiously stalking. But when Dick had gone, and when Miss Grierson had withdrawn to permit her charge a little visit with her relatives, Barney had been prompt with his dissatisfaction.</p><p>&quot;What was the matter with you to-night, Maggie?&quot; he demanded. &quot;You didn&apos;t play up to your usual form.&quot;</p><p>&quot;If you don&apos;t like the way I did it, you may get some one else,&quot; Maggie snapped back.</p><p>&quot;Aw, don&apos;t get sore. If I&apos;m stage-managing this show, I guess it&apos;s my business to tell you how to act the part, and to tell you when you&apos;re endangering the success of the piece by giving a poor performance.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Maybe you&apos;d better get some one else to take my part right now.&quot;</p><p>Maggie&apos;s tone and look were implacable. Barney moved uneasily. That was the worst about Maggie: she wouldn&apos;t take advice from any one unless the advice were a coincidence with or an enlargement of her own wishes, and she was particularly temperish to-night. He hastened to appease her.</p><p>&quot;I guess the best of us have our off days. It&apos;s all right unless&quot;-- Barney hesitated, business fear and jealousy suddenly seizing him-- &quot;unless the way you acted tonight means you don&apos;t intend to go through with it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Why shouldn&apos;t I go through with it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No reason. Unless you acted as you did to-night because&quot;--again Barney hesitated; again jealousy prompted him on--&quot;because you&apos;ve heard in some way from Larry Brainard. Have you heard from Larry?&quot;</p><p>Maggie met his gaze without flinching. She would take the necessary measures in the morning with Miss Grierson to keep that lady from indiscreet talking.</p><p>&quot;I have not heard from Larry, and if I had, it wouldn&apos;t be any of your business, Barney Palmer!&quot;</p><p>He chose to ignore the verbal slap in his face of her last phrase. &quot;No, I guess you haven&apos;t heard from Larry. And I guess none of us will hear from him--not for a long time. He&apos;s certainly fixed himself for fair!&quot;</p><p>&quot;He sure has,&quot; agreed Old Jimmie.</p><p>Maggie said nothing.</p><p>&quot;Seems to me we&apos;ve got this young Sherwood hooked,&quot; said Old Jimmie, who had been impatient during this unprofitable bickering. &quot;Seems to me it&apos;s time to settle just how we&apos;re going to get his dough. How about it, Barney?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Plenty of time for that, Jimmie. This is a big fish, and we&apos;ve got to be absolutely sure we&apos;ve got him hooked so he can&apos;t get off. We&apos;ve got to play safe here; it&apos;s worth waiting for, believe me. Besides, all the while Maggie&apos;s getting practice.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Seems to me we ought to make our clean-up quick. So that--so that--&quot;</p><p>&quot;See here--you think you got some other swell game you want to use Maggie in?&quot;</p><p>Old Jimmie&apos;s shifty gaze wavered before Barney&apos;s glare.</p><p>&quot;No. But she&apos;s my daughter, ain&apos;t she?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes. But who&apos;s running this?&quot; Barney demanded. Thank Heavens, Old Jimmie was one person he did not have to treat like a prima donna!</p><p>&quot;You are.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Then shut up, and let me run it!&quot;</p><p>&quot;You might at least tell if you&apos;ve decided how you&apos;re going to run it,&quot; persisted Old Jimmie.</p><p>&quot;Will you shut up!&quot; snapped Barney.</p><p>Old Jimmie said no more. And having asserted his supremacy over at least one of the two, Barney relented and condescended to talk, lounging back in his chair with that self-conscious grace which had helped make him a figure of increasing note in the gayer restaurants of New York.</p><p>It did not enter into Barney&apos;s calculations, present or for the future, to make Maggie the mistress of any man. Not that Barney was restrained by moral considerations. The thing was just bad business. Such a woman makes but comparatively little; and what is worse, if she chooses, she makes it all for herself. And Barney, in his cynical wisdom of his poor world, further knew that the average man enticed into this poor trap, after the woman has said yes, and after the first brief freshness has lost its bloom, becomes a tight-wad and there is little real money to be got from him for any one.</p><p>&quot;It&apos;s like this: once we&apos;ve got this Sherwood bird safely hooked,&quot; expanded Barney with the air of an authority, flicking off his cigarette ash with his best restaurant manner, &quot;we can play the game a hundred ways. But the marriage proposition is the best bet, and there are two best ways of working that.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Which d&apos;you think we ought to use, Barney?&quot; inquired Old Jimmie.</p><p>But Barney went on as if the older man had not asked a question. &quot;Both ways depend upon Sherwood being crazy in love, and upon his coming across with a proposal and sticking to it. The first way, after being proposed to, Maggie must break down and confess she&apos;s married to a man she doesn&apos;t love and who doesn&apos;t love her. This husband would probably give her a divorce, but he&apos;s a cagy guy and is out for the coin, and if he smelled that she wanted to remarry some one with money he would demand a large price for her freedom. Maggie must further confess that she really has no money, and is therefore helpless. Then Sherwood offers to meet the terms of this brute of a husband. If Sherwood falls for this we shove in a dummy husband who takes Sherwood&apos;s dough--and a big bank roll it will be!--and that&apos;ll be the last Sherwood&apos;ll ever see of Maggie.&quot;</p><p>Old Jimmie nodded. &quot;When it&apos;s worked right, that always brings home the kale.&quot;</p><p>&quot;The only question is,&quot; continued Barney, &quot;can Maggie put that stuff over? How about it, Maggie? Think you&apos;re good enough to handle a proposition like that?&quot;</p><p>Looking the handsome Barney straight in the eyes, Maggie for the moment thought only of his desire to manage her and of the challenge in his tone. Larry and the appeal he had made to her were forgotten, as was also Dick Sherwood.</p><p>&quot;Anything you&apos;re good enough to think up, Barney Palmer, I guess I&apos;m good enough to put over,&quot; she answered coolly.</p><p>And then: &quot;What&apos;s the other way?&quot; she asked.</p><p>&quot;Old stuff. Have to be a sure-enough marriage. Sherwoods are big-time people, you know; a sister who&apos;s a regular somebody. After marriage, family permitted to learn truth--perhaps something much worse than truth. Family horrified. They pay Maggie a big wad for a separation-- same as so many horrified families get rid of daughters-in-law they don&apos;t like. Which of the ways suits you best, Maggie?&quot;</p><p>Maggie shrugged her shoulders with indifference. It suited her present mood to maintain her attitude of being equal to any enterprise.</p><p>&quot;Which do you like best, Barney?&quot; Old Jimmie asked.</p><p>&quot;The second is safer. But then it&apos;s slower; and there would be lawyers&apos; fees which would eat into our profits; and then because of the publicity we might have to wait some time before it would be safe to use Maggie again. The first plan isn&apos;t so complicated, it&apos;s quick, and at once we&apos;ve got Maggie free to use in other operations. The first looks the best bet to me--but, as I said, we don&apos;t have to decide yet. We can let developments help make the actual decision for us.&quot;</p><p>Barney did not add that a further reason for his objecting to the second plan was that he didn&apos;t want Maggie actually tied in marriage to any man. That was a relationship his hopes were reserving for himself.</p><p>Barney&apos;s inborn desire for acknowledged chieftainship again craved assertion and pressed him on to say:</p><p>&quot;You see, Maggie, how much depends on you. You&apos;ve got a whale of a chance for a beginner. I hope you take a big brace over to-night and play up to the possibilities of your part.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You take care of your end, and I&apos;ll take care of mine!&quot; was her sharp retort.</p><p>Barney was flustered for a moment by his second failure to dominate Maggie. &quot;Oh, well, we&apos;ll not row,&quot; he tried to say easily. &quot;We understand each other, and we&apos;re each trying to help the other fellow&apos;s game--that&apos;s the main point.&quot;</p><p>The two men left, Jimmie without kissing his daughter good-night. This caused Maggie no surprise. A kiss, not the lack of it, would have been the thing that would have excited wonder in Maggie.</p><p>Barney went away well satisfied on the whole with the manner in which the affair was progressing, and with his management of it and of Maggie. Maggie was obstinate, to be sure; but he&apos;d soon work that out of her. He was now fully convinced of the soundness of his explanation of Maggie&apos;s poor performance of that night: she had just had an off day.</p><p>As for Maggie, after they had gone she sat up long, thinking--and her thoughts reverted irresistibly to Larry. His visit had been most distracting. But she was not going to let it affect her purpose. If anything, she was more determined than ever to be what she had told him she was going to be, to prove to him that he could not influence her.</p><p>She tried to keep her mind off Larry, but she could not. He was for her so many questions. How had he escaped?--thrown off both police and old friends? Where was he now? What was he doing? And when and how was he going to reappear and interfere?--for Maggie had no doubt, now that she knew him to be in New York, that he would come again; and again try to check her.</p><p>And there was a matter which she no more understood than Larry, and this was another of her questions: Why had she gone into a panic and aided his escape?</p><p>Of course, she now and then thought of Dick Sherwood. She rather liked Dick. But thus far she regarded him exactly as her scheme of life had presented him to her: as a pleasant dupe who, in an exciting play in which she had the thrilling lead, was to be parted from his money. She was rather sorry for him; but this was business, and her sorrow was not going to interfere with what she was going to do.</p><p>Maggie Cameron, at this period of her life, was not deeply introspective. She did not realize what, according to other standards, this thing was which she was doing. She was merely functioning as she had been taught to function. And if any change was beginning in her, she was thus far wholly unconscious of it.</p><p>CHAPTER XX</p><p>Larry&apos;s new problem was the most difficult and delicate dilemma of his life--this divided loyalty: to balk Maggie and the two men behind her without revealing the truth about Maggie to Dick, to protect Dick without betraying Maggie. It certainly was a trying, baffling situation.</p><p>He had no such foolish idea that he could change Maggie by exposing her. At best he would merely render her incapable of continuing this particular course; he would increase her bitterness and hostility to him. Anyhow, according to the remnants of his old code, that wouldn&apos;t be playing fair--particularly after her aiding his escape when he had been trapped.</p><p>Upon only one point was he clear, and on this he became more settled with every hour: whatever he did he must do with the idea of a fundamental awakening in Maggie. Merely to foil her in this one scheme would be to solve the lesser part of his problem; Maggie would be left unchanged, or if changed at all the change would be toward a greater hardness, and his major problem would be made more difficult of solution.</p><p>He considered many ways. He thought of seeing Maggie again, and once more appealing to her. That he vetoed, not because of the danger to himself, but because he knew Maggie would not see him; and if he again did break in upon her unexpectedly, in her obstinate pride she would heed nothing he said. He thought of seeing Barney and Old Jimmie and somehow so throwing the fear of God into that pair that they would withdraw Maggie from the present enterprise; but even if he succeeded in so hazardous an undertaking, again Maggie would be left unchanged. He thought of showing Miss Sherwood the hidden portrait of Maggie, of telling her all and asking her aid; but this he also vetoed, for it seemed a betrayal of Maggie.</p><p>He kept going back to one plan: not a plan exactly, but the idea upon which the right plan might be based. If only he could adroitly, with his hand remaining unseen, place Maggie in a situation where circumstances would appeal conqueringly to her best self, to her latent sense of honor--that was the idea! But cudgel his brain as he would, Larry could not just then develop a working plan whose foundation was that idea.</p><p>But even if Larry had had a brilliant plan it would hardly have been possible for him to have devoted himself to its execution, for two days after his visit to Maggie at the Grantham, the Sherwoods moved out to their summer place some forty miles from the city on the North Shore of Long Island; and Larry was so occupied with routine duties pertaining to this migration that at the moment he had time for little else. Cedar Crest was individual yet typical of the better class of Long Island summer residences. It was a long white building of many piazzas and many wings, set on a bluff looking over the Sound, with a broad stretch of silken lawn, and about it gardens in their June glory, and behind the house a couple of hundred acres of scrub pine.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
The famous Marguerite de Valois, the wife of Henri IV.]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/the-famous-marguerite-de-valois-the-wife-of-henri-iv</link>
            <guid>XGYbOZuKHgnTnTqFaUn5</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 08:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[, had certainly a noble library, and many beautifully bound books stamped with daisies are attributed to her collections. They bear the motto, "Expectata non eludet," which appears to refer, first to the daisy ("Margarita"), which is punctual in the spring, or rather is "the constellated flower that never sets," and next, to the lady, who will "keep tryst." But is the lady Marguerite de Valois? Though the books have been sold at very high prices as relics of the leman of La Mole, it seems imp...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>, had certainly a noble library, and many beautifully bound books stamped with daisies are attributed to her collections. They bear the motto, &quot;Expectata non eludet,&quot; which appears to refer, first to the daisy (&quot;Margarita&quot;), which is punctual in the spring, or rather is &quot;the constellated flower that never sets,&quot; and next, to the lady, who will &quot;keep tryst.&quot; But is the lady Marguerite de Valois? Though the books have been sold at very high prices as relics of the leman of La Mole, it seems impossible to demonstrate that they were ever on her shelves, that they were bound by Clovis Eve from her own design. &quot;No mention is made of them in any contemporary document, and the judicious are reduced to conjectures.&quot; Yet they form a most important collection, systematically bound, science and philosophy in citron morocco, the poets in green, and history and theology in red. In any case it is absurd to explain &quot;Expectata non eludet&quot; as a reference to the lily of the royal arms, which appears on the centre of the daisy-pied volumes. The motto, in that case, would run, &quot;Expectata (lilia) non eludent.&quot; As it stands, the feminine adjective, &quot;expectata,&quot; in the singular, must apply either to the lady who owned the volumes, or to the &quot;Margarita,&quot; her emblem, or to both. Yet the ungrammatical rendering is that which M. Bauchart suggests. Many of the books, Marguerite&apos;s or not, were sold at prices over 100 pounds in London, in 1884 and 1883. The Macrobius, and Theocritus, and Homer are in the Cracherode collection at the British Museum. The daisy crowned Ronsard went for 430 pounds at the Beckford sale. These prices will probably never be reached again.</p><p>If Anne of Austria, the mother of Louis XIV., was a bibliophile, she may be suspected of acting on the motive, &quot;Love me, love my books.&quot; About her affection for Cardinal Mazarin there seems to be no doubt: the Cardinal had a famous library, and his royal friend probably imitated his tastes. In her time, and on her volumes, the originality and taste of the skilled binder, Le Gascon, begin to declare themselves. The fashionable passion for lace, to which La Fontaine made such sacrifices, affected the art of book decorations, and Le Gascon&apos;s beautiful patterns of gold points and dots are copies of the productions of Venice. The Queen-Mother&apos;s books include many devotional treatises, for, whatever other fashions might come and go, piety was always constant before the Revolution. Anne of Austria seems to have been particularly fond of the lives and works of Saint Theresa, and Saint Francois de Sales, and John of the Cross. But she was not unread in the old French poets, such as Coquillart; she condescended to Ariosto; she had that dubious character, Theophile de Viaud, beautifully bound; she owned the Rabelais of 1553; and, what is particularly interesting, M. de Lignerolles possesses her copy of &apos;L&apos;Eschole des Femmes, Comedie par J. B. P. Moliere. Paris: Guillaume de Luynes, 1663.&apos; In 12 [degree sign], red morocco, gilt edges, and the Queen&apos;s arms on the covers. This relic is especially valuable when we remember that &apos;L&apos;Ecole des Femmes&apos; and Arnolphe&apos;s sermon to Agnes, and his comic threats of future punishment first made envy take the form of religious persecution. The devout Queen-Mother was often appealed to by the enemies of Moliere, yet Anne of Austria had not only seen his comedy, but possessed this beautiful example of the first edition. M. Paul Lacroix supposes that this copy was offered to the Queen-Mother by Moliere himself. The frontispiece (Arnolphe preaching to Agnes) is thought to be a portrait of Moliere, but in the reproduction in M. Louis Lacour&apos;s edition it is not easy to see any resemblance. Apparently Anne did not share the views, even in her later years, of the converted Prince de Conty, for several comedies and novels remain stamped with her arms and device.</p><p>The learned Marquise de Rambouillet, the parent of all the &apos;Precieuses,&apos; must have owned a good library, but nothing is chronicled save her celebrated book of prayers and meditations, written out and decorated by Jarry. It is bound in red morocco, double with green, and covered with V&apos;s in gold. The Marquise composed the prayers for her own use, and Jarry was so much struck with their beauty that he asked leave to introduce them into the Book of Hours which he had to copy, &quot;for the prayers are often so silly,&quot; said he, &quot;that I am ashamed to write them out.&quot;</p><p>Here is an example of the devotions which Jarry admired, a prayer to Saint Louis. It was published in &apos;Miscellanies Bibliographiques&apos; by M. Prosper Blanchemain.</p><p>PRIERE A SAINT-LOUIS, ROY DE FRANCE.</p><p>Grand Roy, bien que votre couronne ayt este des plus esclatantes de la Terre, celle que vous portez dans le ciel est incomparablement plus precieuse. L&apos;une estoit perissable l&apos;autre est immortelle et ces lys dont la blancheur se pouvoit ternir, sont maintenant incorruptibles. Vostre obeissance envers vostre mere; vostre justice envers vos sujets; et vos guerres contre les infideles, vous ont acquis la veneration de tous les peuples; et la France doit a vos travaux et a vostre piete l&apos;inestimable tresor de la sanglante et glorieuse couronne du Sauveur du monde. Priez-le incomparable Saint qu&apos;il donne une paix perpetuelle au Royaume dont vous avez porte le sceptre; qu&apos;il le preserve d&apos;heresie; qu&apos;il y face toujours regner saintement vostre illustre Sang; et que tous ceux qui ont l&apos;honneur d&apos;en descendre soient pour jamais fideles a son Eglise.</p><p>The daughter of the Marquise, the fair Julie, heroine of that &quot;long courting&quot; by M. de Montausier, survives in those records as the possessor of &apos;La Guirlande de Julie,&apos; the manuscript book of poems by eminent hands. But this manuscript seems to have been all the library of Julie; therein she could constantly read of her own perfections. To be sure she had also &apos;L&apos;Histoire de Gustave Adolphe,&apos; a hero for whom, like Major Dugald Dalgetty, she cherished a supreme devotion. In the &apos;Guirlande&apos; Chapelain&apos;s verses turn on the pleasing fancy that the Protestant Lion of the North, changed into a flower (like Paul Limayrac in M. Banville&apos;s ode), requests Julie to take pity on his altered estate:</p><p>Sois pitoyable a ma langueur; Et si je n&apos;ay place en ton coeur Que je l&apos;aye au moins sur ta teste.</p><p>These verses were reckoned consummate.</p><p>The &apos;Guirlande&apos; is still, with happier fate than attends most books, in the hands of the successors of the Duc and Duchesse de Montausier.</p><p>Like Julie, Madame de Maintenon was a precieuse, but she never had time to form a regular library. Her books, however, were bound by Duseuil, a binder immortal in the verse of Pope; or it might be more correct to say that Madame de Maintenon&apos;s own books are seldom distinguishable from those of her favourite foundation, St. Cyr. The most interesting is a copy of the first edition of &apos;Esther,&apos; in quarto (1689), bound in red morocco, and bearing, in Racine&apos;s hand, &apos;A Madame la Marquise de Maintenon, offert avec respect,--RACINE.&quot;</p><p>Doubtless Racine had the book bound before he presented it. &quot;People are discontented,&quot; writes his son Louis, &quot;if you offer them a book in a simple marbled paper cover.&quot; I could wish that this worthy custom were restored, for the sake of the art of binding, and also because amateur poets would be more chary of their presentation copies. It is, no doubt, wise to turn these gifts with their sides against the inner walls of bookcases, to be bulwarks against the damp, but the trouble of acknowledging worthless presents from strangers is considerable. {20}</p><p>Another interesting example of Madame de Maintenon&apos;s collections is Dacier&apos;s &apos;Remarques Critiques sur les OEuvres d&apos;Horace,&apos; bearing the arms of Louis XIV., but with his wife&apos;s signature on the fly-leaf (1681).</p><p>Of Madame de Montespan, ousted from the royal favour by Madame de Maintenon, who &quot;married into the family where she had been governess,&quot; there survives one bookish relic of interest. This is &apos;OEuvres Diverses par un auteur de sept ans,&apos; in quarto, red morocco, printed on vellum, and with the arms of the mother of the little Duc du Maine (1678). When Madame de Maintenon was still playing mother to the children of the king and of Madame de Montespan, she printed those &quot;works&quot; of her eldest pupil.</p><p>These ladies were only bibliophiles by accident, and were devoted, in the first place, to pleasure, piety, or ambition. With the Comtesse de Verrue, whose epitaph will be found on an earlier page, we come to a genuine and even fanatical collector. Madame de Verrue (1670-1736) got every kind of diversion out of life, and when she ceased to be young and fair, she turned to the joys of &quot;shopping.&quot; In early years, &quot;pleine de coeur, elle le donna sans comptes.&quot; In later life, she purchased, or obtained on credit, everything that caught her fancy, also sans comptes. &quot;My aunt,&quot; says the Duc de Luynes, &quot;was always buying, and never baulked her fancy.&quot; Pictures, books, coins, jewels, engravings, gems (over 8,000), tapestries, and furniture were all alike precious to Madame de Verrue. Her snuff- boxes defied computation; she had them in gold, in tortoise-shell, in porcelain, in lacquer, and in jasper, and she enjoyed the delicate fragrance of sixty different sorts of snuff. Without applauding the smoking of cigarettes in drawing-rooms, we may admit that it is less repulsive than steady applications to tobacco in Madame de Verrue&apos;s favourite manner.</p><p>The Countess had a noble library, for old tastes survived in her commodious heart, and new tastes she anticipated. She possessed &apos;The Romance of the Rose,&apos; and &apos;Villon,&apos; in editions of Galliot du Pre (1529-1533) undeterred by the satire of Boileau. She had examples of the &apos;Pleiade,&apos; though they were not again admired in France till 1830. She was also in the most modern fashion of to- day, for she had the beautiful quarto of La Fontaine&apos;s &apos;Contes,&apos; and Bouchier&apos;s illustrated Moliere (large paper). And, what I envy her more, she had Perrault&apos;s &apos;Fairy Tales,&apos; in blue morocco--the blue rose of the folklorist who is also a book-hunter. It must also be confessed that Madame de Verrue had a large number of books such as are usually kept under lock and key, books which her heirs did not care to expose at the sale of her library. Once I myself (moi chetif) owned a novel in blue morocco, which had been in the collection of Madame de Verrue. In her old age this exemplary woman invented a peculiarly comfortable arm-chair, which, like her novels, was covered with citron and violet morocco; the nails were of silver. If Madame de Verrue has met the Baroness Bernstein, their conversation in the Elysian Fields must be of the most gallant and interesting description.</p><p>Another literary lady of pleasure, Madame de Pompadour, can only be spoken of with modified approval. Her great fault was that she did not check the decadence of taste and sense in the art of bookbinding. In her time came in the habit of binding books (if binding it can be called) with flat backs, without the nerves and sinews that are of the very essence of book-covers. Without these no binding can be permanent, none can secure the lasting existence of a volume. It is very deeply to be deplored that by far the most accomplished living English artist in bookbinding has reverted to this old and most dangerous heresy. The most original and graceful tooling is of much less real value than permanence, and a book bound with a flat back, without nerfs, might practically as well not be bound at all. The practice was the herald of the French and may open the way for the English Revolution. Of what avail were the ingenious mosaics of Derome to stem the tide of change, when the books whose sides they adorned were not really BOUND at all? Madame de Pompadour&apos;s books were of all sorts, from the inevitable works of devotions to devotions of another sort, and the &apos;Hours&apos; of Erycina Ridens. One of her treasures had singular fortunes, a copy of &apos;Daphnis and Chloe,&apos; with the Regent&apos;s illustrations, and those of Cochin and Eisen (Paris, quarto, 1757, red morocco). The covers are adorned with billing and cooing doves, with the arrows of Eros, with burning hearts, and sheep and shepherds. Eighteen years ago this volume was bought for 10 francs in a village in Hungary. A bookseller gave 8 pounds for it in Paris. M. Bauchart paid for it 150 pounds; and as it has left his shelves, probably he too made no bad bargain. Madame de Pompadour&apos;s &apos;Apology for Herodotus&apos; (La Haye, 1735) has also its legend. It belonged to M. Paillet, who coveted a glorified copy of the &apos;Pastissier Francois,&apos; in M. Bauchart&apos;s collection. M Paillet swopped it, with a number of others, for the &apos;Pastissier:&apos;</p><p>J&apos;avais &apos;L&apos;Apologie Pour Herodote,&apos; en reliure ancienne, amour De livre provenant de chez la Pompadour Il me le soutira! {21}</p><p>Of Marie Antoinette, with whom our lady book-lovers of the old regime must close, there survive many books. She had a library in the Tuileries, as well as at le petit Trianon. Of all her great and varied collections, none is now so valued as her little book of prayers, which was her consolation in the worst of all her evil days, in the Temple and the Conciergerie. The book is &apos;Office de la Divine Providence&apos; (Paris, 1757, green morocco). On the fly-leaf the Queen wrote, some hours before her death, these touching lines: &quot;Ce 16 Octobre, a 4 h. 0.5 du matin. Mon Dieu! ayez pitie de moi! Mes yeux n&apos;ont plus de larmes pour prier pour vous, mes pauvres enfants. Adieu, adieu!--MARIE ANTOINETTE.&quot;</p><p>There can be no sadder relic of a greater sorrow, and the last consolation of the Queen did not escape the French popular genius for cruelty and insult. The arms on the covers of the prayer-book have been cut out by some fanatic of Equality and Fraternity.</p><p>Footnotes:</p><p>{1} See illustrations, pp. 114, 115.--In this Project Gutenberg eText none of the illustrations are included. However, the references to them are included.--DP</p><p>{2} &quot;Slate&quot; is a professional term for a severe criticism. Clearly the word is originally &quot;slat,&quot; a narrow board of wood, with which a person might be beaten.</p><p>{3} Histoire des Intrigues Amoureuses de Moliere, et de celles de sa femme. (A la Sphere.) A Francfort, chez Frederic Arnaud, MDCXCVII. This anonymous tract has actually been attributed to Racine. The copy referred to is marked with a large N in red, with an eagle&apos;s head.</p><p>{4} The Lady of the Lake, 1810.</p><p>The Lay of the Last Minstrel, 1806.</p><p>&quot;To Mrs. Robert Laidlaw, Peel. From the Author.&quot;</p><p>{5} Dictys Cretensis. Apud Lambertum Roulland. Lut. Paris., 1680. In red morocco, with the arms of Colbert.</p><p>{6} L. Annaei Senecae Opera Omnia. Lug. Bat., apud Elzevirios. 1649. With book-plate of the Duke of Sussex.</p><p>{7} Stratonis Epigrammata. Altenburgi, 1764. Straton bound up in one volume with Epictetus! From the Beckford library.</p><p>{8} Opera Helii Eobani Hessi. Yellow morocco, with the first arms of De Thou. Includes a poem addressed &quot;LANGE, decus meum.&quot; Quantity of penultimate &quot;Eobanus&quot; taken for granted, metri gratia.</p><p>{9} La Journee du Chretien. Coutances, 1831. With inscription, &quot;Leon Gambetta. Rue St. Honore. Janvier 1, 1848.&quot;</p><p>{10} Villoison&apos;s Homer. Venice, 1788. With Tessier&apos;s ticket and Schlegel&apos;s book-plate.</p><p>{11} Les Essais de Michel, Seigneur de Montaigne. &quot;Pour Francois le Febvre de Lyon, 1695.&quot; With autograph of Gul. Drummond, and cipresso e palma.</p><p>{12} &quot;The little old foxed Moliere,&quot; once the property of William Pott, unknown to fame.</p><p>{13} That there ever were such editors is much disputed. The story may be a fiction of the age of the Ptolemies.</p><p>{14} Or, more easily, in Maury&apos;s Religions de la Grece.</p><p>{15} See Essay on &apos;Lady Book-Lovers.&apos;</p><p>{16} See Essay on &apos;Lady Book-Lovers.&apos;</p><p>{17} For a specimen of Madame Pompadour&apos;s binding see overleaf. She had another Rabelais in calf, lately to be seen in a shop in Pall Mall.</p><p>{18} Mr. Payne does not give the date of the edition from which he copies the cut. Apparently it is of the fifteenth century.</p><p>{19} Reproduced in The Library, p. 94.</p><p>{20} Country papers, please copy. Poets at a distance will kindly accept this intimation.</p><p>{21} Bibliotheque d&apos;un Bibliophile. Lille, 1885.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
An excellent example is the title-page of 'Les Demandes d'amours,]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/an-excellent-example-is-the-title-page-of-les-demandes-d-amours</link>
            <guid>zrpMs4jqMEuv3mrZdVuT</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 08:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[avec les responses joyeuses,&apos; published by Jacques Moderne, at Lyon, 1540. There is a certain Pagan breadth and joyousness in the figure of Amor, and the man in the hood resembles traditional portraits of Dante. There is more humour, and a good deal of skill, in the title-page of a book on late marriages and their discomforts, &apos;Les dictz et complainctes de trop Tard marie&apos; (Jacques Moderne, Lyon, 1540), where we see the elderly and comfortable couple sitting gravely under their...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>avec les responses joyeuses,&apos; published by Jacques Moderne, at Lyon, 1540. There is a certain Pagan breadth and joyousness in the figure of Amor, and the man in the hood resembles traditional portraits of Dante.</p><p>There is more humour, and a good deal of skill, in the title-page of a book on late marriages and their discomforts, &apos;Les dictz et complainctes de trop Tard marie&apos; (Jacques Moderne, Lyon, 1540), where we see the elderly and comfortable couple sitting gravely under their own fig-tree.</p><p>[Illustration of &apos;Les dictz et complainctes...]</p><p>Jacques Moderne was a printer curious in these quaint devices, and used them in most of his books: for example, in &apos;How Satan and the God Bacchus accuse the Publicans that spoil the wine,&apos; Bacchus and Satan (exactly like each other, as Sir Wilfrid Lawson will not be surprised to hear) are encouraging dishonest tavern-keepers to stew in their own juice in a caldron over a huge fire. From the same popular publisher came a little tract on various modes of sport, if the name of sport can be applied to the netting of fish and birds. The work is styled &apos;Livret nouveau auquel sont contenuz xxv receptes de prendre poissons et oiseaulx avec les mains.&apos; A countryman clad in a goat&apos;s skin with the head and horns drawn over his head as a hood, is dragging ashore a net full of fishes. There is no more characteristic frontispiece of this black-letter sort than the woodcut representing a gallows with three men hanging on it, which illustrates Villon&apos;s &apos;Ballade des Pendus,&apos; and is reproduced in Mr. John Payne&apos;s &apos;Poems of Master Francis Villon of Paris&apos; (London, 1878). {18}</p><p>Earlier in date than these vignettes of Jacques Moderne, but much more artistic and refined in design, are some frontispieces of small octavos printed en lettres rondes, about 1530. In these rubricated letters are used with brilliant effect. One of the best is the title-page of Galliot du Pre&apos;s edition of &apos;Le Rommant de la Rose&apos; (Paris, 1529). {19} Galliot du Pre&apos;s artist, however, surpassed even the charming device of the Lover plucking the Rose, in his title-page, of the same date, for the small octavo edition of Alain Chartier&apos;s poems, which we reproduce here.</p><p>[Illustration of title page]</p><p>The arrangement of letters, and the use of red, make a charming frame, as it were, to the drawing of the mediaeval ship, with the Motto VOGUE LA GALEE.</p><p>Title-pages like these, with designs appropriate to the character of the text, were superseded presently by the fashion of badges, devices, and mottoes. As courtiers and ladies had their private badges, not hereditary, like crests, but personal--the crescent of Diane, the salamander of Francis I., the skulls and cross-bones of Henri III., the marguerites of Marguerite, with mottoes like the Le Banny de liesse, Le traverseur des voies perilleuses, Tout par Soulas, and the like, so printers and authors had their emblems, and their private literary slogans. These they changed, accordinging</p><p>[Another illustration titled: Le Pastissier Francois, MDCLV, title page]</p><p>to fancy, or the vicissitudes of their lives. Clement Marot&apos;s motto was La Mort n&apos;y Mord. It is indicated by the letters L. M. N. M. in the curious title of an edition of Marot&apos;s works published at Lyons by Jean de Tournes in 1579. The portrait represents the poet when the tide of years had borne him far from his youth, far from L&apos;Adolescence Clementine.</p><p>[Another illustration titled: Le Pastissier Francois, 1655, showing a kitchen scene]</p><p>The unfortunate Etienne Dolet, perhaps the only publisher who was ever burned, used an ominous device, a trunk of a tree, with the axe struck into it. In publishing &apos;Les Marguerites de la Marguerite des Princesses, tres illustre Royne de Navarre,&apos; Jean de Tournes employed a pretty allegorical device. Love, with the bandage thrust back from his eyes, and with the bow and arrows in his hand, has flown up to the sun, which he seems to touch; like Prometheus in the myth when he stole the fire, a shower of flowers and flames falls around him. Groueleau, of Paris, had for motto Nul ne s&apos;y frotte, with the thistle for badge. These are beautifully combined in the title-page of his version of Apuleius, &apos;L&apos;Amour de Cupido et de Psyche&apos; (Paris, 1557). There is probably no better date for frontispieces, both for ingenuity of device and for elegance of arrangement of title, than the years between 1530 and 1560. By 1562, when the first edition of the famous Fifth Book of Rabelais was published, the printers appear to have thought devices wasted on popular books, and the title of the Master&apos;s posthumous chapters is printed quite simply.</p><p>In 1532-35 there was a more adventurous taste--witness the title of &apos;Gargantua.&apos; This beautiful title decorates the first known edition, with a date of the First Book of Rabelais. It was sold, most appropriately, devant nostre Dame de Confort. Why should so glorious a relic of the Master have been carried out of England, at the Sunderland sale? All the early titles of Francois Juste&apos;s Lyons editions of Rabelais are on this model. By 1542 he dropped the framework of architectural design. By 1565 Richard Breton, in Paris, was printing Rabelais with a frontispiece of a classical dame holding a heart to the sun, a figure which is almost in the taste of Stothard, or Flaxman.</p><p>The taste for vignettes, engraved on copper, not on wood, was revived under the Elzevirs. Their pretty little title-pages are not so well known but that we offer examples. In the essay on the Elzevirs in this volume will be found a copy of the vignette of the &apos;Imitatio Christi,&apos; and of &apos;Le Pastissier Francois&apos; a reproduction is given here (pp. 114, 115). The artists they employed had plenty of fancy, not backed by very profound skill in design.</p><p>In the same genre as the big-wigged classicism of the Elzevir vignettes, in an age when Louis XIV. and Moliere (in tragedy) wore laurel wreaths over vast perruques, are the early frontispieces of Moliere&apos;s own collected works. Probably the most interesting of all French title-pages are those drawn by Chauveau for the two volumes &apos;Les Oeuvres de M. de Moliere,&apos; published in 1666 by Guillaume de Luynes. The first shows Moliere in two characters, as Mascarille, and as Sganarelle, in &apos;Le Cocu Imaginaire.&apos; Contrast the full-blown jollity of the fourbum imperator, in his hat, and feather, and wig, and vast canons, and tremendous shoe-tie, with the lean melancholy of jealous Sganarelle. These are two notable aspects of the genius of the great comedian. The apes below are the supporters of his scutcheon.</p><p>The second volume shows the Muse of Comedy crowning Mlle. de Moliere (Armande Bejart) in the dress of Agnes, while her husband is in the costume, apparently, of Tartuffe, or of Sganarelle in &apos;L&apos;Ecole des Femmes.&apos; &apos;Tartuffe&apos; had not yet been licensed for a public stage. The interest of the portraits and costumes makes these title-pages precious, they are historical documents rather than mere curiosities.</p><p>These title-pages of Moliere are the highwater mark of French taste in this branch of decoration. In the old quarto first editions of Corneille&apos;s early plays, such as &apos;Le Cid&apos; (Paris 1637), the printers used lax and sprawling combinations of flowers and fruit. These, a little better executed, were the staple of Ribou, de Luynes, Quinet, and the other Parisian booksellers who, one after another, failed to satisfy Moliere as publishers.</p><p>The basket of fruits on the title-page of &apos;Iphigenie,&apos; par M. Racine (Barbin, Paris, 1675), is almost, but not quite, identical with the similar ornament of De Vise&apos;s &apos;La Cocue Imaginaire&apos; (Ribou, Paris 1662). Many of Moliere&apos;s plays appearing first, separately, in small octavo, were adorned with frontispieces, illustrative of some scene in the comedy. Thus, in the &apos;Misanthrope&apos; (Rihou 1667) we see Alceste, green ribbons and all, discoursing with Philinte, or perhaps listening to the famous sonnet of Oronte; it is not easy to be quite certain, but the expression of Alceste&apos;s face looks rather as if he were being baited with a sonnet. From the close of the seventeenth century onwards, the taste for title-pages declined, except when Moreau or Gravelot drew vignettes on copper, with abundance of cupids and nymphs. These were designed for very luxurious and expensive books; for others, men contented themselves with a bald simplicity, which has prevailed till our own time. In recent years the employment of publishers&apos; devices has been less unusual and more agreeable. Thus Poulet Malassis had his armes parlantes, a chicken very uncomfortably perched on a rail. In England we have the cipher and bees of Messrs. Macmillan, the Trees of Life and Knowledge of Messrs. Kegan Paul and Trench, the Ship, which was the sign of Messrs. Longman&apos;s early place of business, and doubtless other symbols, all capable of being quaintly treated in a title-page.</p><p>A BOOKMAN&apos;S PURGATORY</p><p>Thomas Blinton was a book-hunter. He had always been a book-hunter, ever since, at an extremely early age, he had awakened to the errors of his ways as a collector of stamps and monograms. In book-hunting he saw no harm; nay, he would contrast its joys, in a rather pharisaical style, with the pleasures of shooting and fishing. He constantly declined to believe that the devil came for that renowned amateur of black letter, G. Steevens. Dibdin himself, who tells the story (with obvious anxiety and alarm), pretends to refuse credit to the ghastly narrative. &quot;His language,&quot; says Dibdin, in his account of the book-hunter&apos;s end, &quot;was, too frequently, the language of imprecation.&quot; This is rather good, as if Dibdin thought a gentleman might swear pretty often, but not &quot;TOO frequently.&quot; &quot;Although I am not disposed to admit,&quot; Dibdin goes on, &quot;the WHOLE of the testimony of the good woman who watched by Steevens&apos;s bedside, although my prejudices (as they may be called) will not allow me to believe that the windows shook, and that strange noises and deep groans were heard at midnight in his room, yet no creature of common sense (and this woman possessed the quality in an eminent degree) could mistake oaths for prayers;&quot; and so forth. In short, Dibdin clearly holds that the windows did shake &quot;without a blast,&quot; like the banners in Branxholme Hall when somebody came for the Goblin Page.</p><p>But Thomas Blinton would hear of none of these things. He said that his taste made him take exercise; that he walked from the City to West Kensington every day, to beat the covers of the book-stalls, while other men travelled in the expensive cab or the unwholesome Metropolitan Railway. We are all apt to hold favourable views of our own amusements, and, for my own part, I believe that trout and salmon are incapable of feeling pain. But the flimsiness of Blinton&apos;s theories must be apparent to every unbiassed moralist. His &quot;harmless taste&quot; really involved most of the deadly sins, or at all events a fair working majority of them. He coveted his neighbours&apos; books. When he got the chance he bought books in a cheap market and sold them in a dear market, thereby degrading literature to the level of trade. He took advantage of the ignorance of uneducated persons who kept book-stalls. He was envious, and grudged the good fortune of others, while he rejoiced in their failures. He turned a deaf ear to the appeals of poverty. He was luxurious, and laid out more money than he should have done on his selfish pleasures, often adorning a volume with a morocco binding when Mrs. Blinton sighed in vain for some old point d&apos;Alencon lace. Greedy, proud, envious, stingy, extravagant, and sharp in his dealings, Blinton was guilty of most of the sins which the Church recognises as &quot;deadly.&quot;</p><p>On the very day before that of which the affecting history is now to be told, Blinton had been running the usual round of crime. He had (as far as intentions went) defrauded a bookseller in Holywell Street by purchasing from him, for the sum of two shillings, what he took to be a very rare Elzevir. It is true that when he got home and consulted &apos;Willems,&apos; he found that he had got hold of the wrong copy, in which the figures denoting the numbers of pages are printed right, and which is therefore worth exactly &quot;nuppence&quot; to the collector. But the intention is the thing, and Blinton&apos;s intention was distinctly fraudulent. When he discovered his error, then &quot;his language,&quot; as Dibdin says, &quot;was that of imprecation.&quot; Worse (if possible) than this, Blinton had gone to a sale, begun to bid for &apos;Les Essais de Michel, Seigneur de Montaigne&apos; (Foppens, MDCLIX.), and, carried away by excitement, had &quot;plunged&quot; to the extent of 15 pounds, which was precisely the amount of money he owed his plumber and gasfitter, a worthy man with a large family. Then, meeting a friend (if the book-hunter has friends), or rather an accomplice in lawless enterprise, Blinton had remarked the glee on the other&apos;s face. The poor man had purchased a little old Olaus Magnus, with woodcuts, representing were-wolves, fire-drakes, and other fearful wild-fowl, and was happy in his bargain. But Blinton, with fiendish joy, pointed out to him that the index was imperfect, and left him sorrowing.</p><p>Deeds more foul have yet to be told. Thomas Blinton had discovered a new sin, so to speak, in the collecting way. Aristophanes says of one of his favourite blackguards, &quot;Not only is he a villain, but he has invented an original villainy.&quot; Blinton was like this. He maintained that every man who came to notoriety had, at some period, published a volume of poems which he had afterwards repented of and withdrawn. It was Blinton&apos;s hideous pleasure to collect stray copies of these unhappy volumes, these &apos;Peches de Jeunesse,&apos; which, always and invariably, bear a gushing inscription from the author to a friend. He had all Lord John Manners&apos;s poems, and even Mr. Ruskin&apos;s. He had the &apos;Ode to Despair&apos; of Smith (now a comic writer), and the &apos;Love Lyrics&apos; of Brown, who is now a permanent under-secretary, than which nothing can be less gay nor more permanent. He had the amatory songs which a dignitary of the Church published and withdrew from circulation. Blinton was wont to say he expected to come across &apos;Triolets of a Tribune,&apos; by Mr. John Bright, and &apos;Original Hymns for Infant Minds,&apos; by Mr. Henry Labouchere, if he only hunted long enough.</p><p>On the day of which I speak he had secured a volume of love-poems which the author had done his best to destroy, and he had gone to his club and read all the funniest passages aloud to friends of the author, who was on the club committee. Ah, was this a kind action? In short, Blinton had filled up the cup of his iniquities, and nobody will be surprised to hear that he met the appropriate punishment of his offence. Blinton had passed, on the whole, a happy day, notwithstanding the error about the Elzevir. He dined well at his club, went home, slept well, and started next morning for his office in the City, walking, as usual, and intending to pursue the pleasures of the chase at all the book-stalls. At the very first, in the Brompton Road, he saw a man turning over the rubbish in the cheap box. Blinton stared at him, fancied he knew him, thought he didn&apos;t, and then became a prey to the glittering eye of the other. The Stranger, who wore the conventional cloak and slouched soft hat of Strangers, was apparently an accomplished mesmerist, or thought-reader, or adept, or esoteric Buddhist. He resembled Mr. Isaacs, Zanoni (in the novel of that name), Mendoza (in &apos;Codlingsby&apos;), the soul-less man in &apos;A Strange Story,&apos; Mr. Home, Mr. Irving Bishop, a Buddhist adept in the astral body, and most other mysterious characters of history and fiction. Before his Awful Will, Blinton&apos;s mere modern obstinacy shrank back like a child abashed. The Stranger glided to him and whispered, &quot;Buy these.&quot;</p><p>&quot;These&quot; were a complete set of Auerbach&apos;s novels, in English, which, I need not say, Blinton would never have dreamt of purchasing had he been left to his own devices.</p><p>&quot;Buy these!&quot; repeated the Adept, or whatever he was, in a cruel whisper. Paying the sum demanded, and trailing his vast load of German romance, poor Blinton followed the fiend.</p><p>They reached a stall where, amongst much trash, Glatigny&apos;s &apos;Jour de l&apos;An d&apos;un Vagabond&apos; was exposed.</p><p>&quot;Look,&quot; said Blinton, &quot;there is a book I have wanted some time. Glatignys are getting rather scarce, and it is an amusing trifle.&quot;</p><p>&quot; Nay, buy THAT,&quot; said the implacable Stranger, pointing with a hooked forefinger at Alison&apos;s &apos;History of Europe&apos; in an indefinite number of volumes. Blinton shuddered.</p><p>&quot;What, buy THAT, and why? In heaven&apos;s name, what could I do with it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Buy it,&quot; repeated the persecutor, &quot;and THAT&quot; (indicating the &apos;Ilios&apos; of Dr. Schliemann, a bulky work), &quot;and THESE&quot; (pointing to all Mr. Theodore Alois Buckley&apos;s translations of the Classics), &quot;and THESE&quot; (glancing at the collected writings of the late Mr. Hain Friswell, and at a &apos;Life,&apos; in more than one volume, of Mr. Gladstone).</p><p>The miserable Blinton paid, and trudged along carrying the bargains under his arm. Now one book fell out, now another dropped by the way. Sometimes a portion of Alison came ponderously to earth; sometimes the &apos;Gentle Life&apos; sunk resignedly to the ground. The Adept kept picking them up again, and packing them under the arms of the weary Blinton.</p><p>The victim now attempted to put on an air of geniality, and tried to enter into conversation with his tormentor.</p><p>&quot;He DOES know about books,&quot; thought Blinton, &quot;and he must have a weak spot somewhere.&quot;</p><p>So the wretched amateur made play in his best conversational style. He talked of bindings, of Maioli, of Grolier, of De Thou, of Derome, of Clovis Eve, of Roger Payne, of Trautz, and eke of Bauzonnet. He discoursed of first editions, of black letter, and even of illustrations and vignettes. He approached the topic of Bibles, but here his tyrant, with a fierce yet timid glance, interrupted him.</p><p>&quot;Buy those!&quot; he hissed through his teeth.</p><p>&quot;Those&quot; were the complete publications of the Folk Lore Society.</p><p>Blinton did not care for folk lore (very bad men never do), but he had to act as he was told.</p><p>Then, without pause or remorse, he was charged to acquire the &apos;Ethics&apos; of Aristotle, in the agreeable versions of Williams and Chase. Next he secured &apos;Strathmore,&apos; &apos;Chandos,&apos; &apos;Under Two Flags,&apos; and &apos;Two Little Wooden Shoes,&apos; and several dozens more of Ouida&apos;s novels. The next stall was entirely filled with school-books, old geographies, Livys, Delectuses, Arnold&apos;s &apos;Greek Exercises,&apos; Ollendorffs, and what not.</p><p>&quot;Buy them all,&quot; hissed the fiend. He seized whole boxes and piled them on Blinton&apos;s head.</p><p>He tied up Ouida&apos;s novels, in two parcels, with string, and fastened each to one of the buttons above the tails of Blinton&apos;s coat.</p><p>&quot;You are tired?&quot; asked the tormentor. &quot;Never mind, these books will soon be off your hands.&quot;</p><p>So speaking, the Stranger, with amazing speed, hurried Blinton back through Holywell Street, along the Strand, and up to Piccadilly, stopping at last at the door of Blinton&apos;s famous and very expensive binder.</p><p>The binder opened his eyes, as well he might, at the vision of Blinton&apos;s treasures. Then the miserable Blinton found himself, as it were automatically and without any exercise of his will, speaking thus:-</p><p>&quot;Here are some things I have picked up,--extremely rare,--and you will oblige me by binding them in your best manner, regardless of expense. Morocco, of course; crushed levant morocco, double, every book of them, petits fers, my crest and coat of arms, plenty of gilding. Spare no cost. Don&apos;t keep me waiting, as you generally do;&quot; for indeed book-binders are the most dilatory of the human species.</p><p>Before the astonished binder could ask the most necessary questions, Blinton&apos;s tormentor had hurried that amateur out of the room.</p><p>&quot;Come on to the sale,&quot; he cried.</p><p>&quot;What sale?&quot; said Blinton.</p><p>&quot;Why, the Beckford sale; it is the thirteenth day, a lucky day.&quot;</p><p>&quot;But I have forgotten my catalogue.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Where is it?&quot;</p><p>&quot;In the third shelf from the top, on the right-hand side of the ebony book-case at home.&quot;</p><p>The stranger stretched out his arm, which swiftly elongated itself till the hand disappeared from view round the corner. In a moment the hand returned with the catalogue. The pair sped on to Messrs. Sotheby&apos;s auction-rooms in Wellington Street. Every one knows the appearance of a great book-sale. The long table, surrounded by eager bidders, resembles from a little distance a roulette table, and communicates the same sort of excitement. The amateur is at a loss to know how to conduct himself. If he bids in his own person some bookseller will outbid him, partly because the bookseller knows, after all, he knows little about books, and suspects that the amateur may, in this case, know more. Besides, professionals always dislike amateurs, and, in this game, they have a very great advantage. Blinton knew all this, and was in the habit of giving his commissions to a broker. But now he felt (and very naturally) as if a demon had entered into him. &apos;Tirante il Bianco Valorosissimo Cavaliere&apos; was being competed for, an excessively rare romance of chivalry, in magnificent red Venetian morocco, from Canevari&apos;s library. The book is one of the rarest of the Venetian Press, and beautifully adorned with Canevari&apos;s device,--a simple and elegant affair in gold and colours. &quot;Apollo is driving his chariot across the green waves towards the rock, on which winged Pegasus is pawing the ground,&quot; though why this action of a horse should be called &quot;pawing&quot; (the animal notoriously not possessing paws) it is hard to say. Round this graceful design is the inscription [Greek text] (straight not crooked). In his ordinary mood Blinton could only have admired &apos;Tirante il Bianco&apos; from a distance. But now, the demon inspiring him, he rushed into the lists, and challenged the great Mr. -, the Napoleon of bookselling. The price had already reached five hundred pounds.</p><p>&quot;Six hundred,&quot; cried Blinton.</p><p>&quot;Guineas,&quot; said the great Mr. -.</p><p>&quot;Seven hundred,&quot; screamed Blinton.</p><p>&quot;Guineas,&quot; replied the other.</p><p>This arithmetical dialogue went on till even Mr. -- struck his flag, with a sigh, when the maddened Blinton had said &quot;Six thousand.&quot; The cheers of the audience rewarded the largest bid ever made for any book. As if he had not done enough, the Stranger now impelled Blinton to contend with Mr. -- for every expensive work that appeared. The audience naturally fancied that Blinton was in the earlier stage of softening of the brain, when a man conceives himself to have inherited boundless wealth, and is determined to live up to it. The hammer fell for the last time. Blinton owed some fifty thousand pounds, and exclaimed audibly, as the influence of the fiend died out, &quot;I am a ruined man.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Then your books must be sold,&quot; cried the Stranger, and, leaping on a chair, he addressed the audience:-</p><p>&quot;Gentlemen, I invite you to Mr. Blinton&apos;s sale, which will immediately take place. The collection contains some very remarkable early English poets, many first editions of the French classics, most of the rarer Aldines, and a singular assortment of Americana.&quot;</p><p>In a moment, as if by magic, the shelves round the room were filled with Blinton&apos;s books, all tied up in big lots of some thirty volumes each. His early Molieres were fastened to old French dictionaries and school-books. His Shakespeare quartos were in the same lot with tattered railway novels. His copy (almost unique) of Richard Barnfield&apos;s much too &apos;Affectionate Shepheard&apos; was coupled with odd volumes of &apos;Chips from a German Workshop&apos; and a cheap, imperfect example of &apos;Tom Brown&apos;s School-Days.&apos; Hookes&apos;s &apos;Amanda&apos; was at the bottom of a lot of American devotional works, where it kept company with an Elzevir Tacitus and the Aldine &apos;Hypnerotomachia.&apos; The auctioneer put up lot after lot, and Blinton plainly saw that the whole affair was a &quot;knock-out.&quot; His most treasured spoils were parted with at the price of waste paper. It is an awful thing to be present at one&apos;s own sale. No man would bid above a few shillings. Well did Blinton know that after the knock-out the plunder would be shared among the grinning bidders. At last his &apos;Adonais,&apos; uncut, bound by Lortic, went, in company with some old &apos;Bradshaws,&apos; the &apos;Court Guide&apos; of 1881, and an odd volume of the &apos;Sunday at Home,&apos; for sixpence. The Stranger smiled a smile of peculiar malignity. Blinton leaped up to protest; the room seemed to shake around him, but words would not come to his lips.</p><p>Then he heard a familiar voice observe, as a familiar grasp shook his shoulder,--</p><p>&quot;Tom, Tom, what a nightmare you are enjoying!&quot;</p><p>He was in his own arm-chair, where he had fallen asleep after dinner, and Mrs. Blinton was doing her best to arouse him from his awful vision. Beside him lay &apos;L&apos;Enfer du Bibliophile, vu et decrit par Charles Asselineau.&apos; (Paris: Tardieu, MDCCCLX.)</p><p>If this were an ordinary tract, I should have to tell how Blinton&apos;s eyes were opened, how he gave up book-collecting, and took to gardening, or politics, or something of that sort. But truth compels me to admit that Blinton&apos;s repentance had vanished by the end of the week, when he was discovered marking M. Claudin&apos;s catalogue, surreptitiously, before breakfast. Thus, indeed, end all our remorses. &quot;Lancelot falls to his own love again,&quot; as in the romance. Much, and justly, as theologians decry a death-bed repentance, it is, perhaps, the only repentance that we do not repent of. All others leave us ready, when occasion comes, to fall to our old love again; and may that love never be worse than the taste for old books! Once a collector, always a collector. Moi qui parle, I have sinned, and struggled, and fallen. I have thrown catalogues, unopened, into the waste-paper basket. I have withheld my feet from the paths that lead to Sotheby&apos;s and to Puttick&apos;s. I have crossed the street to avoid a book-stall. In fact, like the prophet Nicholas, &quot;I have been known to be steady for weeks at a time.&quot; And then the fatal moment of temptation has arrived, and I have succumbed to the soft seductions of Eisen, or Cochin, or an old book on Angling. Probably Grolier was thinking of such weaknesses when he chose his devices Tanquam Ventus, and quisque suos patimur Manes. Like the wind we are blown about, and, like the people in the AEneid, we are obliged to suffer the consequences of our own extravagance.</p><p>BALLADE OF THE UNATTAINABLE</p><p>The Books I cannot hope to buy, Their phantoms round me waltz and wheel, They pass before the dreaming eye, Ere Sleep the dreaming eye can seal. A kind of literary reel They dance; how fair the bindings shine! Prose cannot tell them what I feel,-- The Books that never can be mine!</p><p>There frisk Editions rare and shy, Morocco clad from head to heel; Shakspearian quartos; Comedy As first she flashed from Richard Steele; And quaint De Foe on Mrs. Veal; And, lord of landing net and line, Old Izaak with his fishing creel,-- The Books that never can be mine!</p><p>Incunables! for you I sigh, Black letter, at thy founts I kneel, Old tales of Perrault&apos;s nursery, For you I&apos;d go without a meal! For Books wherein did Aldus deal And rare Galliot du Pre I pine. The watches of the night reveal The Books that never can be mine!</p><p>ENVOY.</p><p>Prince, bear a hopeless Bard&apos;s appeal; Reverse the rules of Mine and Thine; Make it legitimate to steal The Books that never can be mine!</p><p>LADY BOOK-LOVERS</p><p>The biographer of Mrs. Aphra Behn refutes the vulgar error that &quot;a Dutchman cannot love.&quot; Whether or not a lady can love books is a question that may not be so readily settled. Mr. Ernest Quentin Bauchart has contributed to the discussion of this problem by publishing a bibliography, in two quarto volumes, of books which have been in the libraries of famous beauties of old, queens and princesses of France. There can be no doubt that these ladies were possessors of exquisite printed books and manuscripts wonderfully bound, but it remains uncertain whether the owners, as a rule, were bibliophiles; whether their hearts were with their treasures. Incredible as it may seem to us now, literature was highly respected in the past, and was even fashionable. Poets were in favour at court, and Fashion decided that the great must possess books, and not only books, but books produced in the utmost perfection of art, and bound with all the skill at the disposal of Clovis Eve, and Padeloup, and Duseuil. Therefore, as Fashion gave her commands, we cannot hastily affirm that the ladies who obeyed were really book- lovers. In our more polite age, Fashion has decreed that ladies shall smoke, and bet, and romp, but it would be premature to assert that all ladies who do their duty in these matters are born romps, or have an unaffected liking for cigarettes. History, however, maintains that many of the renowned dames whose books are now the most treasured of literary relics were actually inclined to study as well as to pleasure, like Marguerite de Valois and the Comtesse de Verrue, and even Madame de Pompadour. Probably books and arts were more to this lady&apos;s liking than the diversions by which she beguiled the tedium of Louis XV.; and many a time she would rather have been quiet with her plays and novels than engaged in conscientiously conducted but distasteful revels.</p><p>Like a true Frenchman, M. Bauchart has only written about French lady book-lovers, or about women who, like Mary Stuart, were more than half French. Nor would it be easy for an English author to name, outside the ranks of crowned heads, like Elizabeth, any Englishwomen of distinction who had a passion for the material side of literature, for binding, and first editions, and large paper, and engravings in early &quot;states.&quot; The practical sex, when studious, is like the same sex when fond of equestrian exercise. &quot;A lady says, &apos;My heyes, he&apos;s an &apos;orse, and he must go,&apos;&quot; according to Leech&apos;s groom. In the same way, a studious girl or matron says, &quot;This is a book,&quot; and reads it, if read she does, without caring about the date, or the state, or the publisher&apos;s name, or even very often about the author&apos;s. I remember, before the publication of a novel now celebrated, seeing a privately printed vellum-bound copy on large paper in the hands of a literary lady. She was holding it over the fire, and had already made the vellum covers curl wide open like the shells of an afflicted oyster.</p><p>When I asked what the volume was, she explained that &quot;It is a book which a poor man has written, and he&apos;s had it printed to see whether some one won&apos;t be kind enough to publish it.&quot; I ventured, perhaps pedantically, to point out that the poor man could not be so very poor, or he would not have made so costly an experiment on Dutch paper. But the lady said she did not know how that might be, and she went on toasting the experiment. In all this there is a fine contempt for everything but the spiritual aspect of literature; there is an aversion to the mere coquetry and display of morocco and red letters, and the toys which amuse the minds of men. Where ladies have caught &quot;the Bibliomania,&quot; I fancy they have taken this pretty fever from the other sex. But it must be owned that the books they have possessed, being rarer and more romantic, are even more highly prized by amateurs than examples from the libraries of Grolier, and Longepierre, and D&apos;Hoym. M. Bauchart&apos;s book is a complete guide to the collector of these expensive relics. He begins his dream of fair women who have owned books with the pearl of the Valois, Marguerite d&apos;Angouleme, the sister of Francis I. The remains of her library are chiefly devotional manuscripts. Indeed, it is to be noted that all these ladies, however frivolous, possessed the most devout and pious books, and whole collections of prayers copied out by the pen, and decorated with miniatures. Marguerite&apos;s library was bound in morocco, stamped with a crowned M in interlacs sown with daisies, or, at least, with conventional flowers which may have been meant for daisies. If one could choose, perhaps the most desirable of the specimens extant is &apos;Le Premier Livre du Prince des Poetes, Homere,&apos; in Salel&apos;s translation. For this translation Ronsard writes a prologue, addressed to the manes of Salel, in which he complains that he is ridiculed for his poetry. He draws a characteristic picture of Homer and Salel in Elysium, among the learned lovers:</p><p>qui parmi les fleurs devisent Au giron de leur dame.</p><p>Marguerite&apos;s manuscript copy of the First Book of the Iliad is a small quarto, adorned with daisies, fleurs de-lis, and the crowned M. It is in the Duc d&apos;Aumale&apos;s collection at Chantilly. The books of Diane de Poitiers are more numerous and more famous. When first a widow she stamped her volumes with a laurel springing from a tomb, and the motto, &quot;Sola vivit in illo.&quot; But when she consoled herself with Henri II. she suppressed the tomb, and made the motto meaningless. Her crescent shone not only on her books, but on the palace walls of France, in the Louvre, Fontainebleau, and Anet, and her initial D. is inextricably interlaced with the H. of her royal lover. Indeed, Henri added the D to his own cypher, and this must have been so embarrassing for his wife Catherine, that people have good-naturedly tried to read the curves of the D&apos;s as C&apos;s. The D&apos;s, and the crescents, and the bows of his Diana are impressed even on the covers of Henri&apos;s Book of Hours. Catherine&apos;s own cypher is a double C enlaced with an H, or double K&apos;s (Katherine) combined in the same manner. These, unlike the D.H., are surmounted with a crown--the one advantage which the wife possessed over the favourite. Among Diane&apos;s books are various treatises on medicines and on surgery, and plenty of poetry and Italian novels. Among the books exhibited at the British Museum in glass cases is Diane&apos;s copy of Bembo&apos;s &apos;History of Venice.&apos; An American collector, Mr. Barlow, of New York, is happy enough to possess her &apos;Singularitez de la France Antarctique&apos; (Antwerp, 1558).</p><p>Catherine de Medicis got splendid books on the same terms as foreign pirates procure English novels--she stole them. The Marshal Strozzi, dying in the French service, left a noble collection, on which Catherine laid her hands. Brantome says that Strozzi&apos;s son often expressed to him a candid opinion about this transaction. What with her own collection and what with the Marshal&apos;s, Catherine possessed about four thousand volumes. On her death they were in peril of being seized by her creditors, but her almoner carried them to his own house, and De Thou had them placed in the royal library. Unluckily it was thought wiser to strip the books of the coats with Catherine&apos;s compromising device, lest her creditors should single them out, and take them away in their pockets. Hence, books with her arms and cypher are exceedingly rare. At the sale of the collections of the Duchesse de Berry, a Book of Hours of Catherine&apos;s was sold for 2,400 pounds.</p><p>Mary Stuart of Scotland was one of the lady book-lovers whose taste was more than a mere following of the fashion. Some of her books, like one of Marie Antoinette&apos;s, were the companions of her captivity, and still bear the sad complaints which she entrusted to these last friends of fallen royalty. Her note-book, in which she wrote her Latin prose exercises when a girl, still survives, bound in red morocco, with the arms of France. In a Book of Hours, now the property of the Czar, may be partly deciphered the quatrains which she composed in her sorrowful years, but many of them are mutilated by the binder&apos;s shears. The Queen used the volume as a kind of album: it contains the signatures of the &quot;Countess of Schrewsbury&quot; (as M. Bauchart has it), of Walsingham, of the Earl of Sussex, and of Charles Howard, Earl of Nottingham. There is also the signature, &quot;Your most infortunat, ARBELLA SEYMOUR;&quot; and &quot;Fr. Bacon.&quot;</p><p>This remarkable manuscript was purchased in Paris, during the Revolution, by Peter Dubrowsky, who carried it to Russia. Another Book of Hours of the Queen&apos;s bears this inscription, in a sixteenth- century hand: &quot;Ce sont les Heures de Marie Setuart Renne. Marguerite de Blacuod de Rosay.&quot; In De Blacuod it is not very easy to recognise &quot;Blackwood.&quot; Marguerite was probably the daughter of Adam Blackwood, who wrote a volume on Mary Stuart&apos;s sufferings (Edinburgh, 1587).</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
So universal and ardent has the love of magnificent books been in
France,]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/so-universal-and-ardent-has-the-love-of-magnificent-books-been-in-france</link>
            <guid>KrNwtyBvr57ITvFO6eSB</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 08:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[that it would be possible to write a kind of bibliomaniac history of that country. All her rulers, kings, cardinals, and ladies have had time to spare for collecting. Without going too far back, to the time when Bertha span and Charlemagne was an amateur, we may give a few specimens of an anecdotical history of French bibliolatry, beginning, as is courteous, with a lady. "Can a woman be a bibliophile?" is a question which was once discussed at the weekly breakfast party of Guilbert de Pixerec...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that it would be possible to write a kind of bibliomaniac history of that country. All her rulers, kings, cardinals, and ladies have had time to spare for collecting. Without going too far back, to the time when Bertha span and Charlemagne was an amateur, we may give a few specimens of an anecdotical history of French bibliolatry, beginning, as is courteous, with a lady. &quot;Can a woman be a bibliophile?&quot; is a question which was once discussed at the weekly breakfast party of Guilbert de Pixerecourt, the famous book- lover and playwright, the &quot;Corneille of the Boulevards.&quot; The controversy glided into a discussion as to &quot;how many books a man can love at a time;&quot; but historical examples prove that French women (and Italian, witness the Princess d&apos;Este) may be bibliophiles of the true strain. Diane de Poictiers was their illustrious patroness. The mistress of Henri II. possessed, in the Chateau d&apos;Anet, a library of the first triumphs of typography. Her taste was wide in range, including songs, plays, romances, divinity; her copies of the Fathers were bound in citron morocco, stamped with her arms and devices, and closed with clasps of silver. In the love of books, as in everything else, Diane and Henri II. were inseparable. The interlaced H and D are scattered over the covers of their volumes; the lily of France is twined round the crescents of Diane, or round the quiver, the arrows, and the bow which she adopted as her cognisance, in honour of the maiden goddess. The books of Henri and of Diane remained in the Chateau d&apos;Anet till the death of the Princesse de Conde in 1723, when they were dispersed. The son of the famous Madame de Guyon bought the greater part of the library, which has since been scattered again and again. M. Leopold Double, a well-known bibliophile, possessed several examples. {15}</p><p>Henry III. scarcely deserves, perhaps, the name of a book-lover, for he probably never read the works which were bound for him in the most elaborate way. But that great historian, Alexandre Dumas, takes a far more friendly view of the king&apos;s studies, and, in &apos;La Dame de Monsoreau,&apos; introduces us to a learned monarch. Whether he cared for the contents of his books or not, his books are among the most singular relics of a character which excites even morbid curiosity. No more debauched and worthless wretch ever filled a throne; but, like the bad man in Aristotle, Henri III. was &quot;full of repentance.&quot; When he was not dancing in an unseemly revel, he was on his knees in his chapel. The board of one of his books, of which an engraving lies before me, bears his cipher and crown in the corners; but the centre is occupied in front with a picture of the Annunciation, while on the back is the crucifixion and the breeding heart through which the swords have pierced. His favourite device was the death&apos;s-head, with the motto Memento Mori, or Spes mea Deus. While he was still only Duc d&apos;Anjou, Henri loved Marie de Cleves, Princesse de Conde. On her sudden death he expressed his grief, as he had done his piety, by aid of the petits fers of the bookbinder. Marie&apos;s initials were stamped on his book-covers in a chaplet of laurels. In one corner a skull and cross-bones were figured; in the other the motto Mort m&apos;est vie; while two curly objects, which did duty for tears, filled up the lower corners. The books of Henri III., even when they are absolutely worthless as literature, sell for high prices; and an inane treatise on theology, decorated with his sacred emblems, lately brought about 120 pounds in a London sale.</p><p>Francis I., as a patron of all the arts, was naturally an amateur of bindings. The fates of books were curiously illustrated by the story of the copy of Homer, on large paper, which Aldus, the great Venetian printer, presented to Francis I. After the death of the late Marquis of Hastings, better known as an owner of horses than of books, his possessions were brought to the hammer. With the instinct, the flair, as the French say, of the bibliophile, M. Ambroise Firmin Didot, the biographer of Aldus, guessed that the marquis might have owned something in his line. He sent his agent over to England, to the country town where the sale was to be held. M. Didot had his reward. Among the books which were dragged out of some mouldy store-room was the very Aldine Homer of Francis I., with part of the original binding still clinging to the leaves. M. Didot purchased the precious relic, and sent it to what M. Fertiault (who has written a century of sonnets on bibliomania) calls the hospital for books.</p><p>Le dos humide, je l&apos;eponge; Ou manque un coin, vite une allonge, Pour tous j&apos;ai maison de sante.</p><p>M. Didot, of course, did not practise this amateur surgery himself, but had the arms and devices of Francis I. restored by one of those famous binders who only work for dukes, millionnaires, and Rothschilds.</p><p>During the religious wars and the troubles of the Fronde, it is probable that few people gave much time to the collection of books. The illustrious exceptions are Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin, who possessed a &quot;snuffy Davy&quot; of his own, an indefatigable prowler among book-stalls and dingy purlieus, in Gabriel Naude. In 1664, Naude, who was a learned and ingenious writer, the apologist for &quot;great men suspected of magic,&quot; published the second edition of his &apos;Avis pour dresser une Bibliotheque,&apos; and proved himself to be a true lover of the chase, a mighty hunter (of books) before the Lord. Naude&apos;s advice to the collector is rather amusing. He pretends not to care much for bindings, and quotes Seneca&apos;s rebuke of the Roman bibliomaniacs, Quos voluminum suorum frontes maxime placent titulique,--who chiefly care for the backs and lettering of their volumes. The fact is that Naude had the wealth of Mazarin at his back, and we know very well, from the remains of the Cardinal&apos;s library which exist, that he liked as well as any man to see his cardinal&apos;s hat glittering on red or olive morocco in the midst of the beautiful tooling of the early seventeenth century. When once he got a book, he would not spare to give it a worthy jacket. Naude&apos;s ideas about buying were peculiar. Perhaps he sailed rather nearer the wind than even Monkbarns would have cared to do. His favourite plan was to buy up whole libraries in the gross, &quot;speculative lots&quot; as the dealers call them. In the second place, he advised the book-lover to haunt the retreats of Libraires fripiers, et les vieux fonds et magasins. Here he truly observes that you may find rare books, broches,--that is, unbound and uncut,- -just as Mr. Symonds bought two uncut copies of &apos;Laon and Cythna&apos; in a Bristol stall for a crown. &quot;You may get things for four or five crowns that would cost you forty or fifty elsewhere,&quot; says Naude. Thus a few years ago M. Paul Lacroix bought for two francs, in a Paris shop, the very copy of &apos;Tartuffe&apos; which had belonged to Louis XIV. The example may now be worth perhaps 200 pounds. But we are digressing into the pleasures of the modern sportsman.</p><p>It was not only in second-hand bookshops that Naude hunted, but among the dealers in waste paper. &quot;Thus did Poggio find Quintilian on the counter of a wood-merchant, and Masson picked up &apos;Agobardus&apos; at the shop of a binder, who was going to use the MS. to patch his books withal.&quot; Rossi, who may have seen Naude at work, tells us how he would enter a shop with a yard-measure in his hand, buying books, we are sorry to say, by the ell. &quot;The stalls where he had passed were like the towns through which Attila or the Tartars had swept, with ruin in their train,--ut non hominis unius sedulitas, sed calamitas quaedam per omnes bibliopolarum tabernas pervasisse videatur!&quot; Naude had sorrows of his own. In 1652 the Parliament decreed the confiscation of the splendid library of Mazarin, which was perhaps the first free library in Europe,--the first that was open to all who were worthy of right of entrance. There is a painful description of the sale, from which the book-lover will avert his eyes. On Mazarin&apos;s return to power he managed to collect again and enrich his stores, which form the germ of the existing Bibliotheque Mazarine.</p><p>Among princes and popes it is pleasant to meet one man of letters, and he the greatest of the great age, who was a bibliophile. The enemies and rivals of Moliere--De Vise, De Villiers, and the rest-- are always reproaching him--with his love of bouquins. There is some difference of opinion among philologists about the derivation of bouquin, but all book-hunters know the meaning of the word. The bouquin is the &quot;small, rare volume, black with tarnished gold,&quot; which lies among the wares of the stall-keeper, patient in rain and dust, till the hunter comes who can appreciate the quarry. We like to think of Moliere lounging through the narrow streets in the evening, returning, perhaps, from some noble house where he has been reading the proscribed &apos;Tartuffe,&apos; or giving an imitation of the rival actors at the Hotel Bourgogne. Absent as the contemplateur is, a dingy book-stall wakens him from his reverie. His lace ruffles are soiled in a moment with the learned dust of ancient volumes. Perhaps he picks up the only work out of all his library that is known to exist,--un ravissant petit Elzevir, &apos;De Imperio Magni Mogolis&apos; (Lugd. Bat. 1651). On the title-page of this tiny volume, one of the minute series of &apos;Republics&apos; which the Elzevirs published, the poet has written his rare signature, &quot;J. B. P. Moliere,&quot; with the price the book cost him, &quot;1 livre, 10 sols.&quot; &quot;Il n&apos;est pas de bouquin qui s&apos;echappe de ses mains,&quot; says the author of &apos;La Guerre Comique,&apos; the last of the pamphlets which flew about during the great literary quarrel about &quot;L&apos;Ecole des Femmes.&quot; Thanks to M. Soulie the catalogue of Moliere&apos;s library has been found, though the books themselves have passed out of view. There are about three hundred and fifty volumes in the inventory, but Moliere&apos;s widow may have omitted as valueless (it is the foible of her sex) many rusty bouquins, now worth far more than their weight in gold. Moliere owned no fewer than two hundred and forty volumes of French and Italian comedies. From these he took what suited him wherever he found it. He had plenty of classics, histories, philosophic treatises, the essays of Montaigne, a Plutarch, and a Bible.</p><p>We know nothing, to the regret of bibliophiles, of Moliere&apos;s taste in bindings. Did he have a comic mask stamped on the leather (that device was chased on his plate), or did he display his cognizance and arms, the two apes that support a shield charged with three mirrors of Truth? It is certain--La Bruyere tells us as much--that the sillier sort of book-lover in the seventeenth century was much the same sort of person as his successor in our own time. &quot;A man tells me he has a library,&quot; says La Bruyere (De la Mode); &quot;I ask permission to see it. I go to visit my friend, and he receives me in a house where, even on the stairs, the smell of the black morocco with which his books are covered is so strong that I nearly faint. He does his best to revive me; shouts in my ear that the volumes &apos;have gilt edges,&apos; that they are &apos;elegantly tooled,&apos; that they are &apos;of the good edition,&apos; . . . and informs me that &apos;he never reads,&apos; that &apos;he never sets foot in this part of his house,&apos; that he &apos;will come to oblige me!&apos; I thank him for all his kindness, and have no more desire than himself to see the tanner&apos;s shop that he calls his library.&quot;</p><p>Colbert, the great minister of Louis XIV., was a bibliophile at whom perhaps La Bruyere would have sneered. He was a collector who did not read, but who amassed beautiful books, and looked forward, as business men do, to the day when he would have time to study them. After Grolier, De Thou, and Mazarin, Colbert possessed probably the richest private library in Europe. The ambassadors of France were charged to procure him rare books and manuscripts, and it is said that in a commercial treaty with the Porte he inserted a clause demanding a certain quantity of Levant morocco for the use of the royal bookbinders. England, in those days, had no literature with which France deigned to be acquainted. Even into England, however, valuable books had been imported; and we find Colbert pressing the French ambassador at St. James&apos;s to bid for him at a certain sale of rare heretical writings. People who wanted to gain his favour approached him with presents of books, and the city of Metz gave him two real curiosities--the famous &quot;Metz Bible&quot; and the Missal of Charles the Bald. The Elzevirs sent him their best examples, and though Colbert probably saw more of the gilt covers of his books than of their contents, at least he preserved and handed down many valuable works. As much may be said for the reprobate Cardinal Dubois, who, with all his faults, was a collector. Bossuet, on the other hand, left little or nothing of interest except a copy of the 1682 edition of Moliere, whom he detested and condemned to &quot;the punishment of those who laugh.&quot; Even this book, which has a curious interest, has slipped out of sight, and may have ceased to exist.</p><p>If Colbert and Dubois preserved books from destruction, there are collectors enough who have been rescued from oblivion by books. The diplomacy of D&apos;Hoym is forgotten; the plays of Longepierre, and his quarrels with J. B. Rousseau, are known only to the literary historian. These great amateurs have secured an eternity of gilt edges, an immortality of morocco. Absurd prices are given for any trash that belonged to them, and the writer of this notice has bought for four shillings an Elzevir classic, which when it bears the golden fleece of Longepierre is worth about 100 pounds. Longepierre, D&apos;Hoym, McCarthy, and the Duc de la Valliere, with all their treasures, are less interesting to us than Graille, Coche and Loque, the neglected daughters of Louis XV. They found some pale consolation in their little cabinets of books, in their various liveries of olive, citron, and red morocco.</p><p>A lady amateur of high (book-collecting) reputation, the Comtesse de Verrue, was represented in the Beckford sale by one of three copies of &apos;L&apos;Histoire de Melusine,&apos; of Melusine, the twy-formed fairy, and ancestress of the house of Lusignan. The Comtesse de Verrue, one of the few women who have really understood book-collecting, {16} was born January 18, 1670, and died November 18, 1736. She was the daughter of Charles de Luynes and of his second wife, Anne de Rohan. When only thirteen she married the Comte de Verrue, who somewhat injudiciously presented her, a fleur de quinze ans, as Ronsard says, at the court of Victor Amadeus of Savoy. It is thought that the countess was less cruel than the fleur Angevine of Ronsard. For some reason the young matron fled from the court of Turin and returned to Paris, where she built a magnificent hotel, and received the most distinguished company. According to her biographer, the countess loved science and art jusqu&apos;au delire, and she collected the furniture of the period, without neglecting the blue china of the glowing Orient. In ebony bookcases she possessed about eighteen thousand volumes, bound by the greatest artists of the day. &quot;Without care for the present, without fear of the future, doing good, pursuing the beautiful, protecting the arts, with a tender heart and open hand, the countess passed through life, calm, happy, beloved, and admired.&quot; She left an epitaph on herself, thus rudely translated:-</p><p>Here lies, in sleep secure, A dame inclined to mirth, Who, by way of making sure, Chose her Paradise on earth.</p><p>During the Revolution, to like well-bound books was as much as to proclaim one an aristocrat. Condorcet might have escaped the scaffold if he had only thrown away the neat little Horace from the royal press, which betrayed him for no true Republican, but an educated man. The great libraries from the chateaux of the nobles were scattered among all the book-stalls. True sons of freedom tore off the bindings, with their gilded crests and scutcheons. One revolutionary writer declared, and perhaps he was not far wrong, that the art of binding was the worst enemy of reading. He always began his studies by breaking the backs of the volumes he was about to attack. The art of bookbinding in these sad years took flight to England, and was kept alive by artists robust rather than refined, like Thompson and Roger Payne. These were evil days, when the binder had to cut the aristocratic coat of arms out of a book cover, and glue in a gilt cap of liberty, as in a volume in an Oxford amateur&apos;s collection.</p><p>When Napoleon became Emperor, he strove in vain to make the troubled and feverish years of his power produce a literature. He himself was one of the most voracious readers of novels that ever lived. He was always asking for the newest of the new, and unfortunately even the new romances of his period were hopelessly bad. Barbier, his librarian, had orders to send parcels of fresh fiction to his majesty wherever he might happen to be, and great loads of novels followed Napoleon to Germany, Spain, Italy, Russia. The conqueror was very hard to please. He read in his travelling carriage, and after skimming a few pages would throw a volume that bored him out of the window into the highway. He might have been tracked by his trail of romances, as was Hop-o&apos;-my-Thumb, in the fairy tale, by the white stones he dropped behind him. Poor Barbier, who ministered to a passion for novels that demanded twenty volumes a day, was at his wit&apos;s end. He tried to foist on the Emperor the romances of the year before last; but these Napoleon had generally read, and he refused, with imperial scorn, to look at them again. He ordered a travelling library of three thousand volumes to be made for him, but it was proved that the task could not be accomplished in less than six years. The expense, if only fifty copies of each example had been printed, would have amounted to more than six million francs. A Roman emperor would not have allowed these considerations to stand in his way; but Napoleon, after all, was a modern. He contented himself with a selection of books conveniently small in shape, and packed in sumptuous cases. The classical writers of France could never content Napoleon, and even from Moscow in 1812, he wrote to Barbier clamorous for new books, and good ones. Long before they could have reached Moscow, Napoleon was flying homeward before Kotousoff and Benningsen.</p><p>Napoleon was the last of the book-lovers who governed France. The Duc d&apos;Aumale, a famous bibliophile, has never &quot;come to his own,&quot; and of M. Gambetta it is only known that his devotional library, at least, has found its way into the market. We have reached the era of private book-fanciers: of Nodier, who had three libraries in his time, but never a Virgil; and of Pixerecourt, the dramatist, who founded the Societe des Bibliophiles Francais. The Romantic movement in French literature brought in some new fashions in book- hunting. The original editions of Ronsard, Des Portes, Belleau, and Du Bellay became invaluable; while the writings of Gautier, Petrus Borel, and others excited the passion of collectors. Pixerecourt was a believer in the works of the Elzevirs. On one occasion, when he was outbid by a friend at an auction, he cried passionately, &quot;I shall have that book at your sale!&quot; and, the other poor bibliophile soon falling into a decline and dying, Pixerecourt got the volume which he so much desired. The superstitious might have been excused for crediting him with the gift of jettatura,--of the evil eye. On Pixerecourt himself the evil eye fell at last; his theatre, the Gaiete, was burned down in 1835, and his creditors intended to impound his beloved books. The bibliophile hastily packed them in boxes, and conveyed them in two cabs and under cover of night to the house of M. Paul Lacroix. There they languished in exile till the affairs of the manager were settled.</p><p>Pixerecourt and Nodier, the most reckless of men, were the leaders of the older school of bibliomaniacs. The former was not a rich man; the second was poor, but he never hesitated in face of a price that he could not afford. He would literally ruin himself in the accumulation of a library, and then would recover his fortunes by selling his books. Nodier passed through life without a Virgil, because he never succeeded in finding the ideal Virgil of his dreams,--a clean, uncut copy of the right Elzevir edition, with the misprint, and the two passages in red letters. Perhaps this failure was a judgment on him for the trick by which he beguiled a certain collector of Bibles. He INVENTED an edition, and put the collector on the scent, which he followed vainly, till he died of the sickness of hope deferred.</p><p>One has more sympathy with the eccentricities of Nodier than with the mere extravagance of the new haute ecole of bibliomaniacs, the school of millionnaires, royal dukes, and Rothschilds. These amateurs are reckless of prices, and by their competition have made it almost impossible for a poor man to buy a precious book. The dukes, the Americans, the public libraries, snap them all up in the auctions. A glance at M. Gustave Brunet&apos;s little volume, &apos;La Bibliomanie en 1878,&apos; will prove the excesses which these people commit. The funeral oration of Bossuet over Henriette Marie of France (1669), and Henriette Anne of England (1670), quarto, in the original binding, are sold for 200 pounds. It is true that this copy had possibly belonged to Bossuet himself, and certainly to his nephew. There is an example, as we have seen, of the 1682 edition of Moliere,--of Moliere whom Bossuet detested,--which also belonged to the eagle of Meaux. The manuscript notes of the divine on the work of the poor player must be edifying, and in the interests of science it is to be hoped that this book may soon come into the market. While pamphlets of Bossuet are sold so dear, the first edition of Homer--the beautiful edition of 1488, which the three young Florentine gentlemen published--may be had for 100 pounds. Yet even that seems expensive, when we remember that the copy in the library of George III. cost only seven shillings. This exquisite Homer, sacred to the memory of learned friendships, the chief offering of early printing at the altar of ancient poetry, is really one of the most interesting books in the world. Yet this Homer is less valued than the tiny octavo which contains the ballades and huitains of the scamp Francois Villon (1533). &apos;The History of the Holy Grail&apos; (L&apos;Hystoire du Sainct Greaal: Paris, 1523), in a binding stamped with the four crowns of Louis XIV., is valued at about 500 pounds. A chivalric romance of the old days, which was treasured even in the time of the grand monarque, when old French literature was so much despised, is certainly a curiosity. The Rabelais of Madame de Pompadour (in morocco) seems comparatively cheap at 60 pounds. There is something piquant in the idea of inheriting from that famous beauty the work of the colossal genius of Rabelais. {17}</p><p>The natural sympathy of collectors &quot;to middle fortune born&quot; is not with the rich men whose sport in book-hunting resembles the battue. We side with the poor hunters of the wild game, who hang over the fourpenny stalls on the quais, and dive into the dusty boxes after literary pearls. These devoted men rise betimes, and hurry to the stalls before the common tide of passengers goes by. Early morning is the best moment in this, as in other sports. At half past seven, in summer, the bouquiniste, the dealer in cheap volumes at second- hand, arrays the books which he purchased over night, the stray possessions of ruined families, the outcasts of libraries. The old- fashioned bookseller knew little of the value of his wares; it was his object to turn a small certain profit on his expenditure. It is reckoned that an energetic, business-like old bookseller will turn over 150,000 volumes in a year. In this vast number there must be pickings for the humble collector who cannot afford to encounter the children of Israel at Sotheby&apos;s or at the Hotel Drouot.</p><p>Let the enthusiast, in conclusion, throw a handful of lilies on the grave of the martyr of the love of books,--the poet Albert Glatigny. Poor Glatigny was the son of a garde champetre; his education was accidental, and his poetic taste and skill extraordinarily fine and delicate. In his life of starvation (he had often to sleep in omnibuses and railway stations), he frequently spent the price of a dinner on a new book. He lived to read and to dream, and if he bought books he had not the wherewithal to live. Still, he bought them,--and he died! His own poems were beautifully printed by Lemerre, and it may be a joy to him (si mentem mortalia tangunt) that they are now so highly valued that the price of a copy would have kept the author alive and happy for a month.</p><p>OLD FRENCH TITLE-PAGES</p><p>Nothing can be plainer, as a rule, than a modern English title-page. Its only beauty (if beauty it possesses) consists in the arrangement and &apos;massing&apos; of lines of type in various sizes. We have returned almost to the primitive simplicity of the oldest printed books, which had no title-pages, properly speaking, at all, or merely gave, with extreme brevity, the name of the work, without printer&apos;s mark, or date, or place. These were reserved for the colophon, if it was thought desirable to mention them at all. Thus, in the black-letter example of Guido de Columna&apos;s &apos;History of Troy,&apos; written about 1283, and printed at Strasburg in 1489, the title-page is blank, except for the words,</p><p>Hystoria Troiana Guidonis,</p><p>standing alone at the top of the leaf. The colophon contains all the rest of the information, &apos;happily completed in the City of Strasburg, in the year of Grace Mcccclxxxix, about the Feast of St. Urban.&apos; The printer and publisher give no name at all.</p><p>This early simplicity is succeeded, in French books, from, say, 1510, and afterwards, by the insertion either of the printer&apos;s trademark, or, in black-letter books, of a rough woodcut, illustrative of the nature of the volume. The woodcuts have occasionally a rude kind of grace, with a touch of the classical taste of the early Renaissance surviving in extreme decay.</p><p>[Illustration with title page: Les demandes tamours auec les refpofesioyeufes. Demade refponfe.]</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
From the throng a Jew comes next, meager of frame, round-shouldered, and wearing a coarse brown robe]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/from-the-throng-a-jew-comes-next-meager-of-frame-round-shouldered-and-wearing-a-coarse-brown-robe</link>
            <guid>MAhQzVeAb36dHdxBxdXX</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 03:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[over his eyes and face, and down his back, hangs a mat of long, uncombed hair. He is alone. Those who meet him laugh, if they do not worse; for he is a Nazarite, one of a despised sect which rejects the books of Moses, devotes itself to abhorred vows, and goes unshorn while the vows endure. As we watch his retiring figure, suddenly there is a commotion in the crowd, a parting quickly to the right and left, with exclamations sharp and decisive. Then the cause comes--a man, Hebrew in feature an...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>over his eyes and face, and down his back, hangs a mat of long, uncombed hair. He is alone. Those who meet him laugh, if they do not worse; for he is a Nazarite, one of a despised sect which rejects the books of Moses, devotes itself to abhorred vows, and goes unshorn while the vows endure.</p><p>As we watch his retiring figure, suddenly there is a commotion in the crowd, a parting quickly to the right and left, with exclamations sharp and decisive. Then the cause comes--a man, Hebrew in feature and dress. The mantle of snow-white linen, held to his head by cords of yellow silk, flows free over his shoulders; his robe is richly embroidered, a red sash with fringes of gold wraps his waist several times. His demeanor is calm; he even smiles upon those who, with such rude haste, make room for him. A leper? No, he is only a Samaritan. The shrinking crowd, if asked, would say he is a mongrel--an Assyrian--whose touch of the robe is pollution; from whom, consequently, an Israelite, though dying, might not accept life. In fact, the feud is not of blood. When David set his throne here on Mount Zion, with only Judah to support him, the ten tribes betook themselves to Shechem, a city much older, and, at that date, infinitely richer in holy memories. The final union of the tribes did not settle the dispute thus begun. The Samaritans clung to their tabernacle on Gerizim, and, while maintaining its superior sanctity, laughed at the irate doctors in Jerusalem. Time brought no assuagement of the hate. Under Herod, conversion to the faith was open to all the world except the Samaritans; they alone were absolutely and forever shut out from communion with Jews.</p><p>As the Samaritan goes in under the arch of the gate, out come three men so unlike all whom we have yet seen that they fix our gaze, whether we will or not. They are of unusual stature and immense brawn; their eyes are blue, and so fair is their complexion that the blood shines through the skin like blue pencilling; their hair is light and short; their heads, small and round, rest squarely upon necks columnar as the trunks of trees. Woollen tunics, open at the breast, sleeveless and loosely girt, drape their bodies, leaving bare arms and legs of such development that they at once suggest the arena; and when thereto we add their careless, confident, insolent manner, we cease to wonder that the people give them way, and stop after they have passed to look at them again. They are gladiators--wrestlers, runners, boxers, swordsmen; professionals unknown in Judea before the coming of the Roman; fellows who, what time they are not in training, may be seen strolling through the king&apos;s gardens or sitting with the guards at the palace gates; or possibly they are visitors from Caesarea, Sebaste, or Jericho; in which Herod, more Greek than Jew, and with all a Roman&apos;s love of games and bloody spectacles, has built vast theaters, and now keeps schools of fighting-men, drawn, as is the custom, from the Gallic provinces or the Slavic tribes on the Danube.</p><p>&quot;By Bacchus!&quot; says one of them, drawing his clenched hand to his shoulder, &quot;their skulls are not thicker than eggshells.&quot;</p><p>The brutal look which goes with the gesture disgusts us, and we turn happily to something more pleasant.</p><p>Opposite us is a fruit-stand. The proprietor has a bald head, a long face, and a nose like the beak of a hawk. He sits upon a carpet spread upon the dust; the wall is at his back; overhead hangs a scant curtain, around him, within hand&apos;s reach and arranged upon little stools, lie osier boxes full of almonds, grapes, figs, and pomegranates. To him now comes one at whom we cannot help looking, though for another reason than that which fixed our eyes upon the gladiators; he is really beautiful--a beautiful Greek. Around his temples, holding the waving hair, is a crown of myrtle, to which still cling the pale flowers and half ripe berries. His tunic, scarlet in color, is of the softest woollen fabric; below the girdle of buff leather, which is clasped in front by a fantastic device of shining gold, the skirt drops to the knee in folds heavy with embroidery of the same royal metal; a scarf, also woollen, and of mixed white and yellow, crosses his throat and falls trailing at his back; his arms and legs, where exposed, are white as ivory, and of the polish impossible except by perfect treatment with bath, oil, brushes, and pincers.</p><p>The dealer, keeping his seat, bends forward, and throws his hands up until they meet in front of him, palm downwards and fingers extended.</p><p>&quot;What hast thou, this morning, O son of Paphos?&quot; says the young Greek, looking at the boxes rather than at the Cypriote. &quot;I am hungry. What hast thou for breakfast?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Fruits from the Pedius--genuine--such as the singers of Antioch take of mornings to restore the waste of their voices,&quot; the dealer answers, in a querulous nasal tone.</p><p>&quot;A fig, but not one of thy best, for the singers of Antioch!&quot; says the Greek. &quot;Thou art a worshiper of Aphrodite, and so am I, as the myrtle I wear proves; therefore I tell thee their voices have the chill of a Caspian wind. Seest thou this girdle?--a gift of the mighty Salome--&quot;</p><p>&quot;The king&apos;s sister!&quot; exclaims the Cypriote, with another salaam.</p><p>&quot;And of royal taste and divine judgment. And why not? She is more Greek than the king. But--my breakfast! Here is thy money--red coppers of Cyprus. Give me grapes, and--&quot;</p><p>&quot;Wilt thou not take the dates also?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No, I am not an Arab.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Nor figs?&quot;</p><p>&quot;That would be to make me a Jew. No, nothing but the grapes. Never waters mixed so sweetly as the blood of the Greek and the blood of the grape.&quot;</p><p>The singer in the grimed and seething market, with all his airs of the court, is a vision not easily shut out of mind by such as see him; as if for the purpose, however, a person follows him challenging all our wonder. He comes up the road slowly, his face towards the ground; at intervals he stops, crosses his hands upon his breast, lengthens his countenance, and turns his eyes towards heaven, as if about to break into prayer. Nowhere, except in Jerusalem, can such a character be found. On his forehead, attached to the band which keeps the mantle in place, projects a leathern case, square in form; another similar case is tied by a thong to the left arm; the borders of his robe are decorated with deep fringe; and by such signs--the phylacteries, the enlarged borders of the garment, and the savor of intense holiness pervading the whole man--we know him to be a Pharisee, one of an organization (in religion a sect, in politics a party) whose bigotry and power will shortly bring the world to grief.</p><p>The densest of the throng outside the gate covers the road leading off to Joppa. Turning from the Pharisee, we are attracted by some parties who, as subjects of study, opportunely separate themselves from the motley crowd. First among them a man of very noble appearance--clear, healthful complexion; bright black eyes; beard long and flowing, and rich with unguents; apparel well-fitting, costly, and suitable for the season. He carries a staff, and wears, suspended by a cord from his neck, a large golden seal. Several servants attend him, some of them with short swords stuck through their sashes; when they address him, it is with the utmost deference. The rest of the party consists of two Arabs of the pure desert stock; thin, wiry men, deeply bronzed, and with hollow cheeks, and eyes of almost evil brightness; on their heads red tarbooshes; over their abas, and wrapping the left shoulder and the body so as to leave the right arm free, brown woollen haicks, or blankets. There is loud chaffering, for the Arabs are leading horses and trying to sell them; and, in their eagerness, they speak in high, shrill voices. The courtly person leaves the talking mostly to his servants; occasionally he answers with much dignity; directly, seeing the Cypriote, he stops and buys some figs. And when the whole party has passed the portal, close after the Pharisee, if we betake ourselves to the dealer in fruits, he will tell, with a wonderful salaam, that the stranger is a Jew, one of the princes of the city, who has travelled, and learned the difference between the common grapes of Syria and those of Cyprus, so surpassingly rich with the dews of the sea.</p><p>And so, till towards noon, sometimes later, the steady currents of business habitually flow in and out of the Joppa Gate, carrying with them every variety of character; including representatives of all the tribes of Israel, all the sects among whom the ancient faith has been parcelled and refined away, all the religious and social divisions, all the adventurous rabble who, as children of art and ministers of pleasure, riot in the prodigalities of Herod, and all the peoples of note at any time compassed by the Caesars and their predecessors, especially those dwelling within the circuit of the Mediterranean.</p><p>In other words, Jerusalem, rich in sacred history, richer in connection with sacred prophecies--the Jerusalem of Solomon, in which silver was as stones, and cedars as the sycamores of the vale--had come to be but a copy of Rome, a center of unholy practises, a seat of pagan power. A Jewish king one day put on priestly garments, and went into the Holy of Holies of the first temple to offer incense, and he came out a leper; but in the time of which we are reading, Pompey entered Herod&apos;s temple and the same Holy of Holies, and came out without harm, finding but an empty chamber, and of God not a sign.</p><p>CHAPTER VIII</p><p>The reader is now besought to return to the court described as part of the market at the Joppa Gate. It was the third hour of the day, and many of the people had gone away; yet the press continued without apparent abatement. Of the new-comers, there was a group over by the south wall, consisting of a man, a woman, and a donkey, which requires extended notice.</p><p>The man stood by the animal&apos;s head, holding a leading-strap, and leaning upon a stick which seemed to have been chosen for the double purpose of goad and staff. His dress was like that of the ordinary Jews around him, except that it had an appearance of newness. The mantle dropping from his head, and the robe or frock which clothed his person from neck to heel, were probably the garments he was accustomed to wear to the synagogue on Sabbath days. His features were exposed, and they told of fifty years of life, a surmise confirmed by the gray that streaked his otherwise black beard. He looked around him with the half-curious, half-vacant stare of a stranger and provincial.</p><p>The donkey ate leisurely from an armful of green grass, of which there was an abundance in the market. In its sleepy content, the brute did not admit of disturbance from the bustle and clamor about; no more was it mindful of the woman sitting upon its back in a cushioned pillion. An outer robe of dull woollen stuff completely covered her person, while a white wimple veiled her head and neck. Once in a while, impelled by curiosity to see or hear something passing, she drew the wimple aside, but so slightly that the face remained invisible.</p><p>At length the man was accosted.</p><p>&quot;Are you not Joseph of Nazareth?&quot;</p><p>The speaker was standing close by.</p><p>&quot;I am so called,&quot; answered Joseph, turning gravely around; &quot;And you--ah, peace be unto you! my friend, Rabbi Samuel!&quot;</p><p>&quot;The same give I back to you.&quot; The Rabbi paused, looking at the woman, then added, &quot;To you, and unto your house and all your helpers, be peace.&quot;</p><p>With the last word, he placed one hand upon his breast, and inclined his head to the woman, who, to see him, had by this time withdrawn the wimple enough to show the face of one but a short time out of girlhood. Thereupon the acquaintances grasped right hands, as if to carry them to their lips; at the last moment, however, the clasp was let go, and each kissed his own hand, then put its palm upon his forehead.</p><p>&quot;There is so little dust upon your garments,&quot; the Rabbi said, familiarly, &quot;that I infer you passed the night in this city of our fathers.&quot;</p><p>&quot;No,&quot; Joseph replied, &quot;as we could only make Bethany before the night came, we stayed in the khan there, and took the road again at daybreak.&quot;</p><p>&quot;The journey before you is long, then--not to Joppa, I hope.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Only to Bethlehem.&quot;</p><p>The countenance of the Rabbi, theretofore open and friendly, became lowering and sinister, and he cleared his throat with a growl instead of a cough.</p><p>&quot;Yes, yes--I see,&quot; he said. &quot;You were born in Bethlehem, and wend thither now, with your daughter, to be counted for taxation, as ordered by Caesar. The children of Jacob are as the tribes in Egypt were--only they have neither a Moses nor a Joshua. How are the mighty fallen!&quot;</p><p>Joseph answered, without change of posture or countenance,</p><p>&quot;The woman is not my daughter.&quot;</p><p>But the Rabbi clung to the political idea; and he went on, without noticing the explanation, &quot;What are the Zealots doing down in Galilee?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I am a carpenter, and Nazareth is a village,&quot; said Joseph, cautiously. &quot;The street on which my bench stands is not a road leading to any city. Hewing wood and sawing plank leave me no time to take part in the disputes of parties.&quot;</p><p>&quot;But you are a Jew,&quot; said the Rabbi, earnestly. &quot;You are a Jew, and of the line of David. It is not possible you can find pleasure in the payment of any tax except the shekel given by ancient custom to Jehovah.&quot;</p><p>Joseph held his peace.</p><p>&quot;I do not complain,&quot; his friend continued, &quot;of the amount of the tax--a denarius is a trifle. Oh no! The imposition of the tax is the offense. And, besides, what is paying it but submission to tyranny? Tell me, is it true that Judas claims to be the Messiah? You live in the midst of his followers.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I have heard his followers say he was the Messiah,&quot; Joseph replied.</p><p>At this point the wimple was drawn aside, and for an instant the whole face of the woman was exposed. The eyes of the Rabbi wandered that way, and he had time to see a countenance of rare beauty, kindled by a look of intense interest; then a blush overspread her cheeks and brow, and the veil was returned to its place.</p><p>The politician forgot his subject.</p><p>&quot;Your daughter is comely,&quot; he said, speaking lower.</p><p>&quot;She is not my daughter,&quot; Joseph repeated.</p><p>The curiosity of the Rabbi was aroused; seeing which, the Nazarene hastened to say further, &quot;She is the child of Joachim and Anna of Bethlehem, of whom you have at least heard, for they were of great repute--&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes,&quot; remarked the Rabbi, deferentially, &quot;I know them. They were lineally descended from David. I knew them well.&quot;</p><p>Well, they are dead now,&quot; the Nazarene proceeded. &quot;They died in Nazareth. Joachim was not rich, yet he left a house and garden to be divided between his daughters Marian and Mary. This is one of them; and to save her portion of the property, the law required her to marry her next of kin. She is now my wife.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And you were--&quot;</p><p>&quot;Her uncle.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes, yes! And as you were both born in Bethlehem, the Roman compels you to take her there with you to be also counted.&quot;</p><p>The Rabbi clasped his hands, and looked indignantly to heaven, exclaiming, &quot;The God of Israel still lives! The vengeance is his!&quot;</p><p>With that he turned and abruptly departed. A stranger near by, observing Joseph&apos;s amazement, said, quietly, &quot;Rabbi Samuel is a zealot. Judas himself is not more fierce.&quot;</p><p>Joseph, not wishing to talk with the man, appeared not to hear, and busied himself gathering in a little heap the grass which the donkey had tossed abroad; after which he leaned upon his staff again, and waited.</p><p>In another hour the party passed out the gate, and, turning to the left, took the road into Bethlehem. The descent into the valley of Hinnom was quite broken, garnished here and there with straggling wild olive-trees. Carefully, tenderly, the Nazarene walked by the woman&apos;s side, leading-strap in hand. On their left, reaching to the south and east round Mount Zion, rose the city wall, and on their right the steep prominences which form the western boundary of the valley.</p><p>Slowly they passed the Lower Pool of Gihon, out of which the sun was fast driving the lessening shadow of the royal hill; slowly they proceeded, keeping parallel with the aqueduct from the Pools of Solomon, until near the site of the country-house on what is now called the Hill of Evil Counsel; there they began to ascend to the plain of Rephaim. The sun streamed garishly over the stony face of the famous locality, and under its influence Mary, the daughter of Joachim, dropped the wimple entirely, and bared her head. Joseph told the story of the Philistines surprised in their camp there by David. He was tedious in the narrative, speaking with the solemn countenance and lifeless manner of a dull man. She did not always hear him.</p><p>Wherever on the land men go, and on the sea ships, the face and figure of the Jew are familiar. The physical type of the race has always been the same; yet there have been some individual variations. &quot;Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to.&quot; Such was the son of Jesse when brought before Samuel. The fancies of men have been ever since ruled by the description. Poetic license has extended the peculiarities of the ancestor to his notable descendants. So all our ideal Solomons have fair faces, and hair and beard chestnut in the shade, and of the tint of gold in the sun. Such, we are also made believe, were the locks of Absalom the beloved. And, in the absence of authentic history, tradition has dealt no less lovingly by her whom we are now following down to the native city of the ruddy king.</p><p>She was not more than fifteen. Her form, voice, and manner belonged to the period of transition from girlhood. Her face was perfectly oval, her complexion more pale than fair. The nose was faultless; the lips, slightly parted, were full and ripe, giving to the lines of the mouth warmth, tenderness, and trust; the eyes were blue and large, and shaded by drooping lids and long lashes; and, in harmony with all, a flood of golden hair, in the style permitted to Jewish brides, fell unconfined down her back to the pillion on which she sat. The throat and neck had the downy softness sometimes seen which leaves the artist in doubt whether it is an effect of contour or color. To these charms of feature and person were added others more indefinable--an air of purity which only the soul can impart, and of abstraction natural to such as think much of things impalpable. Often, with trembling lips, she raised her eyes to heaven, itself not more deeply blue; often she crossed her hands upon her breast, as in adoration and prayer; often she raised her head like one listening eagerly for a calling voice. Now and then, midst his slow utterances, Joseph turned to look at her, and, catching the expression kindling her face as with light, forgot his theme, and with bowed head, wondering, plodded on.</p><p>So they skirted the great plain, and at length reached the elevation Mar Elias; from which, across a valley, they beheld Bethlehem, the old, old House of Bread, its white walls crowning a ridge, and shining above the brown scumbling of leafless orchards. They paused there, and rested, while Joseph pointed out the places of sacred renown; then they went down into the valley to the well which was the scene of one of the marvellous exploits of David&apos;s strong men. The narrow space was crowded with people and animals. A fear came upon Joseph--a fear lest, if the town were so thronged, there might not be house-room for the gentle Mary. Without delay, he hurried on, past the pillar of stone marking the tomb of Rachel, up the gardened slope, saluting none of the many persons he met on the way, until he stopped before the portal of the khan that then stood outside the village gates, near a junction of roads.</p><p>CHAPTER IX</p><p>To understand thoroughly what happened to the Nazarene at the khan, the reader must be reminded that Eastern inns were different from the inns of the Western world. They were called khans, from the Persian, and, in simplest form, were fenced enclosures, without house or shed, often without a gate or entrance. Their sites were chosen with reference to shade, defence, or water. Such were the inns that sheltered Jacob when he went to seek a wife in Padan-Aram. Their like may been seen at this day in the stopping-places of the desert. On the other hand, some of them, especially those on the roads between great cities, like Jerusalem and Alexandria, were princely establishments, monuments to the piety of the kings who built them. In ordinary, however, they were no more than the house or possession of a sheik, in which, as in headquarters, he swayed his tribe. Lodging the traveller was the least of their uses; they were markets, factories, forts; places of assemblage and residence for merchants and artisans quite as much as places of shelter for belated and wandering wayfarers. Within their walls, all the year round, occurred the multiplied daily transactions of a town.</p><p>The singular management of these hostelries was the feature likely to strike a Western mind with most force. There was no host or hostess; no clerk, cook, or kitchen; a steward at the gate was all the assertion of government or proprietorship anywhere visible. Strangers arriving stayed at will without rendering account. A consequence of the system was that whoever came had to bring his food and culinary outfit with him, or buy them of dealers in the khan. The same rule held good as to his bed and bedding, and forage for his beasts. Water, rest, shelter, and protection were all he looked for from the proprietor, and they were gratuities. The peace of synagogues was sometimes broken by brawling disputants, but that of the khans never. The houses and all their appurtenances were sacred: a well was not more so.</p><p>The khan at Bethlehem, before which Joseph and his wife stopped, was a good specimen of its class, being neither very primitive nor very princely. The building was purely Oriental; that is to say, a quadrangular block of rough stones, one story high, flat-roofed, externally unbroken by a window, and with but one principal entrance--a doorway, which was also a gateway, on the eastern side, or front. The road ran by the door so near that the chalk dust half covered the lintel. A fence of flat rocks, beginning at the northeastern corner of the pile, extended many yards down the slope to a point from whence it swept westwardly to a limestone bluff; making what was in the highest degree essential to a respectable khan--a safe enclosure for animals.</p><p>In a village like Bethlehem, as there was but one sheik, there could not well be more than one khan; and, though born in the place, the Nazarene, from long residence elsewhere, had no claim to hospitality in the town. Moreover, the enumeration for which he was coming might be the work of weeks or months; Roman deputies in the provinces were proverbially slow; and to impose himself and wife for a period so uncertain upon acquaintances or relations was out of the question. So, before he drew nigh the great house, while he was yet climbing the slope, in the steep places toiling to hasten the donkey, the fear that he might not find accommodations in the khan became a painful anxiety; for he found the road thronged with men and boys who, with great ado, were taking their cattle, horses, and camels to and from the valley, some to water, some to the neighboring caves. And when he was come close by, his alarm was not allayed by the discovery of a crowd investing the door of the establishment, while the enclosure adjoining, broad as it was, seemed already full.</p><p>&quot;We cannot reach the door,&quot; Joseph said, in his slow way. &quot;Let us stop here, and learn, if we can, what has happened.&quot;</p><p>The wife, without answering, quietly drew the wimple aside. The look of fatigue at first upon her face changed to one of interest. She found herself at the edge of an assemblage that could not be other than a matter of curiosity to her, although it was common enough at the khans on any of the highways which the great caravans were accustomed to traverse. There were men on foot, running hither and thither, talking shrilly and in all the tongues of Syria; men on horseback screaming to men on camels; men struggling doubtfully with fractious cows and frightened sheep; men peddling bread and wine; and among the mass a herd of boys apparently in chase of a herd of dogs. Everybody and everything seemed to be in motion at the same time. Possibly the fair spectator was too weary to be long attracted by the scene; in a little while she sighed, and settled down on the pillion, and, as if in search of peace and rest, or in expectation of some one, looked off to the south, and up to the tall cliffs of the Mount of Paradise, then faintly reddening under the setting sun.</p><p>While she was thus looking, a man pushed his way out of the press, and, stopping close by the donkey, faced about with an angry brow. The Nazarene spoke to him.</p><p>&quot;As I am what I take you to be, good friend--a son of Judah--may I ask the cause of this multitude?&quot;</p><p>The stranger turned fiercely; but, seeing the solemn countenance of Joseph, so in keeping with his deep, slow voice and speech, he raised his hand in half-salutation, and replied,</p><p>&quot;Peace be to you, Rabbi! I am a son of Judah, and will answer you. I dwell in Beth-Dagon, which, you know, is in what used to be the land of the tribe of Dan.&quot;</p><p>&quot;On the road to Joppa from Modin,&quot; said Joseph.</p><p>&quot;Ah, you have been in Beth-Dagon,&quot; the man said, his face softening yet more. &quot;What wanderers we of Judah are! I have been away from the ridge--old Ephrath, as our father Jacob called it-- for many years. When the proclamation went abroad requiring all Hebrews to be numbered at the cities of their birth-- That is my business here, Rabbi.&quot;</p><p>Joseph&apos;s face remained stolid as a mask, while he remarked, &quot;I have come for that also--I and my wife.&quot;</p><p>The stranger glanced at Mary and kept silence. She was looking up at the bald top of Gedor. The sun touched her upturned face, and filled the violet depths of her eyes, and upon her parted lips trembled an aspiration which could not have been to a mortal. For the moment, all the humanity of her beauty seemed refined away: she was as we fancy they are who sit close by the gate in the transfiguring light of Heaven. The Beth-Dagonite saw the original of what, centuries after, came as a vision of genius to Sanzio the divine, and left him immortal.</p><p>&quot;Of what was I speaking? Ah! I remember. I was about to say that when I heard of the order to come here, I was angry. Then I thought of the old hill, and the town, and the valley falling away into the depths of Cedron; of the vines and orchards, and fields of grain, unfailing since the days of Boaz and Ruth, of the familiar mountains--Gedor here, Gibeah yonder, Mar Elias there--which, when I was a boy, were the walls of the world to me; and I forgave the tyrants and came--I, and Rachel, my wife, and Deborah and Michal, our roses of Sharon.&quot;</p><p>The man paused again, looking abruptly at Mary, who was now looking at him and listening. Then he said, &quot;Rabbi, will not your wife go to mine? You may see her yonder with the children, under the leaning olive-tree at the bend of the road. I tell you&quot;--he turned to Joseph and spoke positively--&quot;I tell you the khan is full. It is useless to ask at the gate.&quot;</p><p>Joseph&apos;s will was slow, like his mind; he hesitated, but at length replied, &quot;The offer is kind. Whether there be room for us or not in the house, we will go see your people. Let me speak to the gate-keeper myself. I will return quickly.&quot;</p><p>And, putting the leading-strap in the stranger&apos;s hand, he pushed into the stirring crowd.</p><p>The keeper sat on a great cedar block outside the gate. Against the wall behind him leaned a javelin. A dog squatted on the block by his side.</p><p>&quot;The peace of Jehovah be with you,&quot; said Joseph, at last confronting the keeper.</p><p>&quot;What you give, may you find again; and, when found, be it many times multiplied to you and yours,&quot; returned the watchman, gravely, though without moving.</p><p>&quot;I am a Bethlehemite,&quot; said Joseph, in his most deliberate way. Is there not room for--&quot;</p><p>&quot;There is not.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You may have heard of me--Joseph of Nazareth. This is the house of my fathers. I am of the line of David.&quot;</p><p>These words held the Nazarene&apos;s hope. If they failed him, further appeal was idle, even that of the offer of many shekels. To be a son of Judah was one thing--in the tribal opinion a great thing; to be of the house of David was yet another; on the tongue of a Hebrew there could be no higher boast. A thousand years and more had passed since the boyish shepherd became the successor of Saul and founded a royal family. Wars, calamities, other kings, and the countless obscuring processes of time had, as respects fortune, lowered his descendants to the common Jewish level; the bread they ate came to them of toil never more humble; yet they had the benefit of history sacredly kept, of which genealogy was the first chapter and the last; they could not become unknown, while, wherever they went In Israel, acquaintance drew after it a respect amounting to reverence.</p><p>If this were so in Jerusalem and elsewhere, certainly one of the sacred line might reasonably rely upon it at the door of the khan of Bethlehem. To say, as Joseph said, &quot;This is the house of my fathers,&quot; was to say the truth most simply and literally; for it was the very house Ruth ruled as the wife of Boaz, the very house in which Jesse and his ten sons, David the youngest, were born, the very house in which Samuel came seeking a king, and found him; the very house which David gave to the son of Barzillai, the friendly Gileadite; the very house in which Jeremiah, by prayer, rescued the remnant of his race flying before the Babylonians.</p><p>The appeal was not without effect. The keeper of the gate slid down from the cedar block, and, laying his hand upon his beard, said, respectfully, &quot;Rabbi, I cannot tell you when this door first opened in welcome to the traveller, but it was more than a thousand years ago; and in all that time there is no known instance of a good man turned away, save when there was no room to rest him in. If it has been so with the stranger, just cause must the steward have who says no to one of the line of David. Wherefore, I salute you again; and, if you care to go with me, I will show you that there is not a lodging-place left in the house; neither in the chambers, nor in the lewens, nor in the court--not even on the roof. May I ask when you came?&quot;</p><p>&quot;But now.&quot;</p><p>The keeper smiled.</p><p>&quot;&apos;The stranger that dwelleth with you shall be as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself.&apos; Is not that the law, Rabbi?&quot;</p><p>Joseph was silent.</p><p>&quot;If it be the law, can I say to one a long time come, &apos;Go thy way; another is here to take thy place?&apos;&quot;</p><p>Yet Joseph held his peace.</p><p>&quot;And, if I said so, to whom would the place belong? See the many that have been waiting, some of them since noon.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Who are all these people?&quot; asked Joseph, turning to the crowd. &quot;And why are they here at this time?&quot;</p><p>&quot;That which doubtless brought you, Rabbi--the decree of the Caesar&quot;--the keeper threw an interrogative glance at the Nazarene, then continued--&quot;brought most of those who have lodging in the house. And yesterday the caravan passing from Damascus to Arabia and Lower Egypt arrived. These you see here belong to it-- men and camels.&quot;</p><p>Still Joseph persisted.</p><p>&quot;The court is large,&quot; he said.</p><p>&quot;Yes, but it is heaped with cargoes--with bales of silk, and pockets of spices, and goods of every kind.&quot;</p><p>Then for a moment the face of the applicant lost its stolidity; the lustreless, staring eyes dropped. With some warmth he next said, &quot;I do not care for myself, but I have with me my wife, and the night is cold--colder on these heights than in Nazareth. She cannot live in the open air. Is there not room in the town?&quot;</p><p>&quot;These people&quot;--the keeper waved his hand to the throng before the door--&quot;have all besought the town, and they report its accommodations all engaged.&quot;</p><p>Again Joseph studied the ground, saying, half to himself, &quot;She is so young! if I make her bed on the hill, the frosts will kill her.&quot;</p><p>Then he spoke to the keeper again.</p><p>&quot;It may be you knew her parents, Joachim and Anna, once of Bethlehem, and, like myself, of the line of David.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes, I knew them. They were good people. That was in my youth.&quot;</p><p>This time the keeper&apos;s eyes sought the ground in thought. Suddenly he raised his head.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
"And in the morning I awoke with the Spirit as a light within me surpassing that of the sun.]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/and-in-the-morning-i-awoke-with-the-spirit-as-a-light-within-me-surpassing-that-of-the-sun</link>
            <guid>tBpdeFK1GflQcuC4Jt6J</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 03:04:36 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[I put off my hermit&apos;s garb, and dressed myself as of old. From a hiding-place I took the treasure which I had brought from the city. A ship went sailing past. I hailed it, was taken aboard, and landed at Antioch. There I bought the camel and his furniture. Through the gardens and orchards that enamel the banks of the Orontes, I journeyed to Emesa, Damascus, Bostra, and Philadelphia; thence hither. And so, O brethren, you have my story. Let me now listen to you." CHAPTER IV The Egyptian a...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put off my hermit&apos;s garb, and dressed myself as of old. From a hiding-place I took the treasure which I had brought from the city. A ship went sailing past. I hailed it, was taken aboard, and landed at Antioch. There I bought the camel and his furniture. Through the gardens and orchards that enamel the banks of the Orontes, I journeyed to Emesa, Damascus, Bostra, and Philadelphia; thence hither. And so, O brethren, you have my story. Let me now listen to you.&quot;</p><p>CHAPTER IV</p><p>The Egyptian and the Hindoo looked at each other; the former waved his hand; the latter bowed, and began:</p><p>&quot;Our brother has spoken well. May my words be as wise.&quot;</p><p>He broke off, reflected a moment, then resumed:</p><p>&quot;You may know me, brethren, by the name of Melchior. I speak to you in a language which, if not the oldest in the world, was at least the soonest to be reduced to letters--I mean the Sanscrit of India. I am a Hindoo by birth. My people were the first to walk in the fields of knowledge, first to divide them, first to make them beautiful. Whatever may hereafter befall, the four Vedas must live, for they are the primal fountains of religion and useful intelligence. From them were derived the Upa-Vedas, which, delivered by Brahma, treat of medicine, archery, architecture, music, and the four-and-sixty mechanical arts; the Ved-Angas, revealed by inspired saints, and devoted to astronomy, grammar, prosody, pronunciation, charms and incantations, religious rites and ceremonies; the Up-Angas, written by the sage Vyasa, and given to cosmogony, chronology, and geography; therein also are the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, heroic poems, designed for the perpetuation of our gods and demi-gods. Such, O brethren, are the Great Shastras, or books of sacred ordinances. They are dead to me now; yet through all time they will serve to illustrate the budding genius of my race. They were promises of quick perfection. Ask you why the promises failed? Alas! the books themselves closed all the gates of progress. Under pretext of care for the creature, their authors imposed the fatal principle that a man must not address himself to discovery or invention, as Heaven had provided him all things needful. When that condition became a sacred law, the lamp of Hindoo genius was let down a well, where ever since it has lighted narrow walls and bitter waters.</p><p>&quot;These allusions, brethren, are not from pride, as you will understand when I tell you that the Shastras teach a Supreme God called Brahm; also, that the Puranas, or sacred poems of the Up-Angas, tell us of Virtue and Good Works, and of the Soul. So, if my brother will permit the saying&quot;--the speaker bowed deferentially to the Greek--&quot;ages before his people were known, the two great ideas, God and the Soul, had absorbed all the forces of the Hindoo mind. In further explanation let me say that Brahm is taught, by the same sacred books, as a Triad--Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. Of these, Brahma is said to have been the author of our race; which, in course of creation, he divided into four castes. First, he peopled the worlds below and the heavens above; next, he made the earth ready for terrestrial spirits; then from his mouth proceeded the Brahman caste, nearest in likeness to himself, highest and noblest, sole teachers of the Vedas, which at the same time flowed from his lips in finished state, perfect in all useful knowledge. From his arms next issued the Kshatriya, or warriors; from his breast, the seat of life, came the Vaisya, or producers--shepherds, farmers, merchants; from his foot, in sign of degradation, sprang the Sudra, or serviles, doomed to menial duties for the other classes--serfs, domestics, laborers, artisans. Take notice, further, that the law, so born with them, forbade a man of one caste becoming a member of another; the Brahman could not enter a lower order; if he violated the laws of his own grade, he became an outcast, lost to all but outcasts like himself.&quot;</p><p>At this point, the imagination of the Greek, flashing forward upon all the consequences of such a degradation, overcame his eager attention, and he exclaimed, &quot;In such a state, O brethren, what mighty need of a loving God!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes,&quot; added the Egyptian, &quot;of a loving God like ours.&quot;</p><p>The brows of the Hindoo knit painfully; when the emotion was spent, he proceeded, in a softened voice.</p><p>&quot;I was born a Brahman. My life, consequently, was ordered down to its least act, its last hour. My first draught of nourishment; the giving me my compound name; taking me out the first time to see the sun; investing me with the triple thread by which I became one of the twice-born; my induction into the first order--were all celebrated with sacred texts and rigid ceremonies. I might not walk, eat, drink, or sleep without danger of violating a rule. And the penalty, O brethren, the penalty was to my soul! According to the degrees of omission, my soul went to one of the heavens--Indra&apos;s the lowest, Brahma&apos;s the highest; or it was driven back to become the life of a worm, a fly, a fish, or a brute. The reward for perfect observance was Beatitude, or absorption into the being of Brahm, which was not existence as much as absolute rest.&quot;</p><p>The Hindoo gave himself a moment&apos;s thought; proceeding, he said: &quot;The part of a Brahman&apos;s life called the first order is his student life. When I was ready to enter the second order--that is to say, when I was ready to marry and become a householder--I questioned everything, even Brahm; I was a heretic. From the depths of the well I had discovered a light above, and yearned to go up and see what all it shone upon. At last--ah, with what years of toil!--I stood in the perfect day, and beheld the principle of life, the element of religion, the link between the soul and God--Love!&quot;</p><p>The shrunken face of the good man kindled visibly, and he clasped his hands with force. A silence ensued, during which the others looked at him, the Greek through tears. At length he resumed:</p><p>&quot;The happiness of love is in action; its test is what one is willing to do for others. I could not rest. Brahm had filled the world with so much wretchedness. The Sudra appealed to me, so did the countless devotees and victims. The island of Ganga Lagor lies where the sacred waters of the Ganges disappear in the Indian Ocean. Thither I betook myself. In the shade of the temple built there to the sage Kapila, in a union of prayers with the disciples whom the sanctified memory of the holy man keeps around his house, I thought to find rest. But twice every year came pilgrimages of Hindoos seeking the purification of the waters. Their misery strengthened my love. Against its impulse to speak I clenched my jaws; for one word against Brahm or the Triad or the Shastras would doom me; one act of kindness to the outcast Brahmans who now and then dragged themselves to die on the burning sands--a blessing said, a cup of water given--and I became one of them, lost to family, country, privileges, caste. The love conquered! I spoke to the disciples in the temple; they drove me out. I spoke to the pilgrims; they stoned me from the island. On the highways I attempted to preach; my hearers fled from me, or sought my life. In all India, finally, there was not a place in which I could find peace or safety--not even among the outcasts, for, though fallen, they were still believers in Brahm. In my extremity, I looked for a solitude in which to hide from all but God. I followed the Ganges to its source, far up in the Himalayas. When I entered the pass at Hurdwar, where the river, in unstained purity, leaps to its course through the muddy lowlands, I prayed for my race, and thought myself lost to them forever. Through gorges, over cliffs, across glaciers, by peaks that seemed star-high, I made my way to the Lang Tso, a lake of marvellous beauty, asleep at the feet of the Tise Gangri, the Gurla, and the Kailas Parbot, giants which flaunt their crowns of snow everlastingly in the face of the sun. There, in the centre of the earth, where the Indus, Ganges, and Brahmapootra rise to run their different courses; where mankind took up their first abode, and separated to replete the world, leaving Balk, the mother of cities, to attest the great fact; where Nature, gone back to its primeval condition, and secure in its immensities, invites the sage and the exile, with promise of safety to the one and solitude to the other--there I went to abide alone with God, praying, fasting, waiting for death.&quot;</p><p>Again the voice fell, and the bony hands met in a fervent clasp.</p><p>&quot;One night I walked by the shores of the lake, and spoke to the listening silence, &apos;When will God come and claim his own? Is there to be no redemption?&apos; Suddenly a light began to glow tremulously out on the water; soon a star arose, and moved towards me, and stood overhead. The brightness stunned me. While I lay upon the ground, I heard a voice of infinite sweetness say, &apos;Thy love hath conquered. Blessed art thou, O son of India! The redemption is at hand. With two others, from far quarters of the earth, thou shalt see the Redeemer, and be a witness that he hath come. In the morning arise, and go meet them; and put all thy trust in the Spirit which shall guide thee.&apos;</p><p>&quot;And from that time the light has stayed with me; so I knew it was the visible presence of the Spirit. In the morning I started to the world by the way I had come. In a cleft of the mountain I found a stone of vast worth, which I sold in Hurdwar. By Lahore, and Cabool, and Yezd, I came to Ispahan. There I bought the camel, and thence was led to Bagdad, not waiting for caravans. Alone I traveled, fearless, for the Spirit was with me, and is with me yet. What glory is ours, O brethren! We are to see the Redeemer--to speak to him--to worship him! I am done.&quot;</p><p>CHAPTER V</p><p>The vivacious Greek broke forth in expressions of joy and congratulations; after which the Egyptian said, with characteristic gravity:</p><p>&quot;I salute you, my brother. You have suffered much, and I rejoice in your triumph. If you are both pleased to hear me, I will now tell you who I am, and how I came to be called. Wait for me a moment.&quot;</p><p>He went out and tended the camels; coming back, he resumed his seat.</p><p>&quot;Your words, brethren, were of the Spirit,&quot; he said, in commencement; &quot;and the Spirit gives me to understand them. You each spoke particularly of your countries; in that there was a great object, which I will explain; but to make the interpretation complete, let me first speak of myself and my people. I am Balthasar the Egyptian.&quot;</p><p>The last words were spoken quietly, but with so much dignity that both listeners bowed to the speaker.</p><p>&quot;There are many distinctions I might claim for my race,&quot; he continued; &quot;but I will content myself with one. History began with us. We were the first to perpetuate events by records kept. So we have no traditions; and instead of poetry, we offer you certainty. On the facades of palaces and temples, on obelisks, on the inner walls of tombs, we wrote the names of our kings, and what they did; and to the delicate papyri we intrusted the wisdom of our philosophers and the secrets of our religion--all the secrets but one, whereof I will presently speak. Older than the Vedas of Para-Brahm or the Up-Angas of Vyasa, O Melchior; older than the songs of Homer or the metaphysics of Plato, O my Gaspar; older than the sacred books or kings of the people of China, or those of Siddartha, son of the beautiful Maya; older than the Genesis of Mosche the Hebrew--oldest of human records are the writings of Menes, our first king.&quot; Pausing an instant, he fixed his large eves kindly upon the Greek, saying, &quot;In the youth of Hellas, who, O Gaspar, were the teachers of her teachers?&quot;</p><p>The Greek bowed, smiling.</p><p>&quot;By those records,&quot; Balthasar continued, &quot;we know that when the fathers came from the far East, from the region of the birth of the three sacred rivers, from the centre of the earth--the Old Iran of which you spoke, O Melchior--came bringing with them the history of the world before the Flood, and of the Flood itself, as given to the Aryans by the sons of Noah, they taught God, the Creator and the Beginning, and the Soul, deathless as God. When the duty which calls us now is happily done, if you choose to go with me, I will show you the sacred library of our priesthood; among others, the Book of the Dead, in which is the ritual to be observed by the soul after Death has despatched it on its journey to judgment. The ideas--God and the Immortal Soul--were borne to Mizraim over the desert, and by him to the banks of the Nile. They were then in their purity, easy of understanding, as what God intends for our happiness always is; so, also, was the first worship--a song and a prayer natural to a soul joyous, hopeful, and in love with its Maker.&quot;</p><p>Here the Greek threw up his hands, exclaiming, &quot;Oh! the light deepens within me!&quot;</p><p>&quot;And in me!&quot; said the Hindoo, with equal fervor.</p><p>The Egyptian regarded them benignantly, then went on, saying, &quot;Religion is merely the law which binds man to his Creator: in purity it has but these elements--God, the Soul, and their Mutual Recognition; out of which, when put in practise, spring Worship, Love, and Reward. This law, like all others of divine origin-- like that, for instance, which binds the earth to the sun--was perfected in the beginning by its Author. Such, my brothers, was the religion of the first family; such was the religion of our father Mizraim, who could not have been blind to the formula of creation, nowhere so discernible as in the first faith and the earliest worship. Perfection is God; simplicity is perfection. The curse of curses is that men will not let truths like these alone.&quot;</p><p>He stopped, as if considering in what manner to continue.</p><p>&quot;Many nations have loved the sweet waters of the Nile,&quot; he said next; &quot;the Ethiopian, the Pali-Putra, the Hebrew, the Assyrian, the Persian, the Macedonian, the Roman--of whom all, except the Hebrew, have at one time or another been its masters. So much coming and going of peoples corrupted the old Mizraimic faith. The Valley of Palms became a Valley of Gods. The Supreme One was divided into eight, each personating a creative principle in nature, with Ammon-Re at the head. Then Isis and Osiris, and their circle, representing water, fire, air, and other forces, were invented. Still the multiplication went on until we had another order, suggested by human qualities, such as strength, knowledge, love, and the like.&quot;</p><p>&quot;In all which there was the old folly!&quot; cried the Greek, impulsively. &quot;Only the things out of reach remain as they came to us.&quot;</p><p>The Egyptian bowed, and proceeded:</p><p>&quot;Yet a little further, O my brethren, a little further, before I come to myself. What we go to will seem all the holier of comparison with what is and has been. The records show that Mizraim found the Nile in possession of the Ethiopians, who were spread thence through the African desert; a people of rich, fantastic genius, wholly given to the worship of nature. The Poetic Persian sacrificed to the sun, as the completest image of Ormuzd, his God; the devout children of the far East carved their deities out of wood and ivory; but the Ethiopian, without writing, without books, without mechanical faculty of any kind, quieted his soul by the worship of animals, birds, and insects, holding the cat sacred to Re, the bull to Isis, the beetle to Pthah. A long struggle against their rude faith ended in its adoption as the religion of the new empire. Then rose the mighty monuments that cumber the river-bank and the desert--obelisk, labyrinth, pyramid, and tomb of king, blent with tomb of crocodile. Into such deep debasement, O brethren, the sons of the Aryan fell!&quot;</p><p>Here, for the first time, the calmness of the Egyptian forsook him: though his countenance remained impassive, his voice gave way.</p><p>&quot;Do not too much despise my countrymen,&quot; he began again. &quot;They did not all forget God. I said awhile ago, you may remember, that to papyri we intrusted all the secrets of our religion except one; of that I will now tell you. We had as king once a certain Pharaoh, who lent himself to all manner of changes and additions. To establish the new system, he strove to drive the old entirely out of mind. The Hebrews then dwelt with us as slaves. They clung to their God; and when the persecution became intolerable, they were delivered in a manner never to be forgotten. I speak from the records now. Mosche, himself a Hebrew, came to the palace, and demanded permission for the slaves, then millions in number, to leave the country. The demand was in the name of the Lord God of Israel. Pharaoh refused. Hear what followed. First, all the water, that in the lakes and rivers, like that in the wells and vessels, turned to blood. Yet the monarch refused. Then frogs came up and covered all the land. Still he was firm. Then Mosche threw ashes in the air, and a plague attacked the Egyptians. Next, all the cattle, except of the Hebrews, were struck dead. Locusts devoured the green things of the valley. At noon the day was turned into a darkness so thick that lamps would not burn. Finally, in the night all the first-born of the Egyptians died; not even Pharaoh&apos;s escaped. Then he yielded. But when the Hebrews were gone he followed them with his army. At the last moment the sea was divided, so that the fugitives passed it dry-shod. When the pursuers drove in after them, the waves rushed back and drowned horse, foot, charioteers, and king. You spoke of revelation, my Gaspar--&quot;</p><p>The blue eyes of the Greek sparkled.</p><p>&quot;I had the story from the Jew,&quot; he cried. &quot;You confirm it, O Balthasar!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes, but through me Egypt speaks, not Mosche. I interpret the marbles. The priests of that time wrote in their way what they witnessed, and the revelation has lived. So I come to the one unrecorded secret. In my country, brethren, we have, from the day of the unfortunate Pharaoh, always had two religions--one private, the other public; one of many gods, practised by the people; the other of one God, cherished only by the priesthood. Rejoice with me, O brothers! All the trampling by the many nations, all the harrowing by kings, all the inventions of enemies, all the changes of time, have been in vain. Like a seed under the mountains waiting its hour, the glorious Truth has lived; and this--this is its day!&quot;</p><p>The wasted frame of the Hindoo trembled with delight, and the Greek cried aloud,</p><p>&quot;It seems to me the very desert is singing.&quot;</p><p>From a gurglet of water near-by the Egyptian took a draught, and proceeded:</p><p>&quot;I was born at Alexandria, a prince and a priest, and had the education usual to my class. But very early I became discontented. Part of the faith imposed was that after death upon the destruction of the body, the soul at once began its former progression from the lowest up to humanity, the highest and last existence; and that without reference to conduct in the mortal life. When I heard of the Persian&apos;s Realm of Light, his Paradise across the bridge Chinevat, where only the good go, the thought haunted me; insomuch that in the day, as in the night, I brooded over the comparative ideas Eternal Transmigration and Eternal Life in Heaven. If, as my teacher taught, God was just, why was there no distinction between the good and the bad? At length it became clear to me, a certainty, a corollary of the law to which I reduced pure religion, that death was only the point of separation at which the wicked are left or lost, and the faithful rise to a higher life; not the nirvana of Buddha, or the negative rest of Brahma, O Melchior; nor the better condition in hell, which is all of Heaven allowed by the Olympic faith, O Gaspar; but life--life active, joyous, everlasting--LIFE WITH GOD! The discovery led to another inquiry. Why should the Truth be longer kept a secret for the selfish solace of the priesthood? The reason for the suppression was gone. Philosophy had at least brought us toleration. In Egypt we had Rome instead of Rameses. One day, in the Brucheium, the most splendid and crowded quarter of Alexandria, I arose and preached. The East and West contributed to my audience. Students going to the Library, priests from the Serapeion, idlers from the Museum, patrons of the race-course, countrymen from the Rhacotis--a multitude--stopped to hear me. I preached God, the Soul, Right and Wrong, and Heaven, the reward of a virtuous life. You, O Melchior, were stoned; my auditors first wondered, then laughed. I tried again; they pelted me with epigrams, covered my God with ridicule, and darkened my Heaven with mockery. Not to linger needlessly, I fell before them.&quot;</p><p>The Hindoo here drew a long sigh, as he said, &quot;The enemy of man is man, my brother.&quot;</p><p>Balthasar lapsed into silence.</p><p>&quot;I gave much thought to finding the cause of my failure, and at last succeeded,&quot; he said, upon beginning again. &quot;Up the river, a day&apos;s journey from the city, there is a village of herdsmen and gardeners. I took a boat and went there. In the evening I called the people together, men and women, the poorest of the poor. I preached to them exactly as I had preached in the Brucheium. They did not laugh. Next evening I spoke again, and they believed and rejoiced, and carried the news abroad. At the third meeting a society was formed for prayer. I returned to the city then. Drifting down the river, under the stars, which never seemed so bright and so near, I evolved this lesson: To begin a reform, go not into the places of the great and rich; go rather to those whose cups of happiness are empty--to the poor and humble. And then I laid a plan and devoted my life. As a first step, I secured my vast property, so that the income would be certain, and always at call for the relief of the suffering. From that day, O brethren, I travelled up and down the Nile, in the villages, and to all the tribes, preaching One God, a righteous life, and reward in Heaven. I have done good--it does not become me to say how much. I also know that part of the world to be ripe for the reception of Him we go to find.&quot;</p><p>A flush suffused the swarthy cheek of the speaker; but he overcame the feeling, and continued:</p><p>&quot;The years so given, O my brothers, were troubled by one thought--When I was gone, what would become of the cause I had started? Was it to end with me? I had dreamed many times of organization as a fitting crown for my work. To hide nothing from you, I had tried to effect it, and failed. Brethren, the world is now in the condition that, to restore the old Mizraimic faith, the reformer must have a more than human sanction; he must not merely come in God&apos;s name, he must have the proofs subject to his word; he must demonstrate all he says, even God. So preoccupied is the mind with myths and systems; so much do false deities crowd every place--earth, air, sky; so have they become of everything a part, that return to the first religion can only be along bloody paths, through fields of persecution; that is to say, the converts must be willing to die rather than recant. And who in this age can carry the faith of men to such a point but God himself? To redeem the race--I do not mean to destroy it--to REDEEM the race, he must make himself once more manifest; HE MUST COME IN PERSON.&quot;</p><p>Intense emotion seized the three.</p><p>&quot;Are we not going to find him?&quot; exclaimed the Greek.</p><p>&quot;You understand why I failed in the attempt to organize,&quot; said the Egyptian, when the spell was past. &quot;I had not the sanction. To know that my work must be lost made me intolerably wretched. I believed in prayer, and to make my appeals pure and strong, like you, my brethren, I went out of the beaten ways, I went where man had not been, where only God was. Above the fifth cataract, above the meeting of rivers in Sennar, up the Bahr el Abiad, into the far unknown of Africa, I went. There, in the morning, a mountain blue as the sky flings a cooling shadow wide over the western desert, and, with its cascades of melted snow, feeds a broad lake nestling at its base on the east. The lake is the mother of the great river. For a year and more the mountain gave me a home. The fruit of the palm fed my body, prayer my spirit. One night I walked in the orchard close by the little sea. &apos;The world is dying. When wilt thou come? Why may I not see the redemption, O God?&apos; So I prayed. The glassy water was sparkling with stars. One of them seemed to leave its place, and rise to the surface, where it became a brilliancy burning to the eyes. Then it moved towards me, and stood over my head, apparently in hand&apos;s reach. I fell down and hid my face. A voice, not of the earth, said, &apos;Thy good works have conquered. Blessed art thou, O son of Mizraim! The redemption cometh. With two others, from the remotenesses of the world, thou shalt see the Saviour, and testify for him. In the morning arise, and go meet them. And when ye have all come to the holy city of Jerusalem, ask of the people, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the East and are sent to worship him. Put all thy trust in the Spirit which will guide thee.&apos;</p><p>&quot;And the light became an inward illumination not to be doubted, and has stayed with me, a governor and a guide. It led me down the river to Memphis, where I made ready for the desert. I bought my camel, and came hither without rest, by way of Suez and Kufileh, and up through the lands of Moab and Ammon. God is with us, O my brethren!&quot;</p><p>He paused, and thereupon, with a prompting not their own, they all arose, and looked at each other.</p><p>&quot;I said there was a purpose in the particularity with which we described our people and their histories,&quot; so the Egyptian proceeded. &quot;He we go to find was called &apos;King of the Jews;&apos; by that name we are bidden to ask for him. But, now that we have met, and heard from each other, we may know him to be the Redeemer, not of the Jews alone, but of all the nations of the earth. The patriarch who survived the Flood had with him three sons, and their families, by whom the world was repeopled. From the old Aryana-Vaejo, the well-remembered Region of Delight in the heart of Asia, they parted. India and the far East received the children of the first; the descendant of the youngest, through the North, streamed into Europe; those of the second overflowed the deserts about the Red Sea, passing into Africa; and though most of the latter are yet dwellers in shifting tents, some of them became builders along the Nile.&quot;</p><p>By a simultaneous impulse the three joined hands.</p><p>&quot;Could anything be more divinely ordered?&quot; Balthasar continued. &quot;When we have found the Lord, the brothers, and all the generations that have succeeded them, will kneel to him in homage with us. And when we part to go our separate ways, the world will have learned a new lesson--that Heaven may be won, not by the sword, not by human wisdom, but by Faith, Love, and Good Works.&quot;</p><p>There was silence, broken by sighs and sanctified with tears; for the joy that filled them might not be stayed. It was the unspeakable joy of souls on the shores of the River of Life, resting with the Redeemed in God&apos;s presence.</p><p>Presently their hands fell apart, and together they went out of the tent. The desert was still as the sky. The sun was sinking fast. The camels slept.</p><p>A little while after, the tent was struck, and, with the remains of the repast, restored to the cot; then the friends mounted, and set out single file, led by the Egyptian. Their course was due west, into the chilly night. The camels swung forward in steady trot, keeping the line and the intervals so exactly that those following seemed to tread in the tracks of the leader. The riders spoke not once.</p><p>By-and-by the moon came up. And as the three tall white figures sped, with soundless tread, through the opalescent light, they appeared like specters flying from hateful shadows. Suddenly, in the air before them, not farther up than a low hill-top flared a lambent flame; as they looked at it, the apparition contracted into a focus of dazzling lustre. Their hearts beat fast; their souls thrilled; and they shouted as with one voice, &quot;The Star! the Star! God is with us!&quot;</p><p>CHAPTER VI</p><p>In an aperture of the western wall of Jerusalem hang the &quot;oaken valves&quot; called the Bethlehem or Joppa Gate. The area outside of them is one of the notable places of the city. Long before David coveted Zion there was a citadel there. When at last the son of Jesse ousted the Jebusite, and began to build, the site of the citadel became the northwest corner of the new wall, defended by a tower much more imposing than the old one. The location of the gate, however, was not disturbed, for the reasons, most likely, that the roads which met and merged in front of it could not well be transferred to any other point, while the area outside had become a recognized market-place. In Solomon&apos;s day there was great traffic at the locality, shared in by traders from Egypt and the rich dealers from Tyre and Sidon. Nearly three thousand years have passed, and yet a kind of commerce clings to the spot. A pilgrim wanting a pin or a pistol, a cucumber or a camel, a house or a horse, a loan or a lentil, a date or a dragoman, a melon or a man, a dove or a donkey, has only to inquire for the article at the Joppa Gate. Sometimes the scene is quite animated, and then it suggests, What a place the old market must have been in the days of Herod the Builder! And to that period and that market the reader is now to be transferred.</p><p>Following the Hebrew system, the meeting of the wise men described in the preceding chapters took place in the afternoon of the twenty-fifth day of the third month of the year; that is say, on the twenty-fifth day of December. The year was the second of the 193d Olympiad, or the 747th of Rome; the sixty-seventh of Herod the Great, and the thirty-fifth of his reign; the fourth before the beginning of the Christian era. The hours of the day, by Judean custom, begin with the sun, the first hour being the first after sunrise; so, to be precise; the market at the Joppa Gate during the first hour of the day stated was in full session, and very lively. The massive valves had been wide open since dawn. Business, always aggressive, had pushed through the arched entrance into a narrow lane and court, which, passing by the walls of the great tower, conducted on into the city. As Jerusalem is in the hill country, the morning air on this occasion was not a little crisp. The rays of the sun, with their promise of warmth, lingered provokingly far up on the battlements and turrets of the great piles about, down from which fell the crooning of pigeons and the whir of the flocks coming and going.</p><p>As a passing acquaintance with the people of the Holy City, strangers as well as residents, will be necessary to an understanding of some of the pages which follow, it will be well to stop at the gate and pass the scene in review. Better opportunity will not offer to get sight of the populace who will afterwhile go forward in a mood very different from that which now possesses them.</p><p>The scene is at first one of utter confusion--confusion of action, sounds, colors, and things. It is especially so in the lane and court. The ground there is paved with broad unshaped flags, from which each cry and jar and hoof-stamp arises to swell the medley that rings and roars up between the solid impending walls. A little mixing with the throng, however, a little familiarity with the business going on, will make analysis possible.</p><p>Here stands a donkey, dozing under panniers full of lentils, beans, onions, and cucumbers, brought fresh from the gardens and terraces of Galilee. When not engaged in serving customers, the master, in a voice which only the initiated can understand, cries his stock. Nothing can be simpler than his costume--sandals, and an unbleached, undyed blanket, crossed over one shoulder and girt round the waist. Near-by, and far more imposing and grotesque, though scarcely as patient as the donkey, kneels a camel, raw-boned, rough, and gray, with long shaggy tufts of fox-colored hair under its throat, neck, and body, and a load of boxes and baskets curiously arranged upon an enormous saddle. The owner is an Egyptian, small, lithe, and of a complexion which has borrowed a good deal from the dust of the roads and the sands of the desert. He wears a faded tarbooshe, a loose gown, sleeveless, unbelted, and dropping from the neck to the knee. His feet are bare. The camel, restless under the load, groans and occasionally shows his teeth; but the man paces indifferently to and fro, holding the driving-strap, and all the time advertising his fruits fresh from the orchards of the Kedron--grapes, dates, figs, apples, and pomegranates.</p><p>At the corner where the lane opens out into the court, some women sit with their backs against the gray stones of the wall. Their dress is that common to the humbler classes of the country--a linen frock extending the full length of the person, loosely gathered at the waist, and a veil or wimple broad enough, after covering the head, to wrap the shoulders. Their merchandise is contained in a number of earthen jars, such as are still used in the East for bringing water from the wells, and some leathern bottles. Among the jars and bottles, rolling upon the stony floor, regardless of the crowd and cold, often in danger but never hurt, play half a dozen half-naked children, their brown bodies, jetty eyes, and thick black hair attesting the blood of Israel. Sometimes, from under the wimples, the mothers look up, and in the vernacular modestly bespeak their trade: in the bottles &quot;honey of grapes,&quot; in the jars &quot;strong drink.&quot; Their entreaties are usually lost in the general uproar, and they fare illy against the many competitors: brawny fellows with bare legs, dirty tunics, and long beards, going about with bottles lashed to their backs, and shouting &quot;Honey of wine! Grapes of En-Gedi!&quot; When a customer halts one of them, round comes the bottle, and, upon lifting the thumb from the nozzle, out into the ready cup gushes the deep-red blood of the luscious berry.</p><p>Scarcely less blatant are the dealers in birds--doves, ducks, and frequently the singing bulbul, or nightingale, most frequently pigeons; and buyers, receiving them from the nets, seldom fail to think of the perilous life of the catchers, bold climbers of the cliffs; now hanging with hand and foot to the face of the crag, now swinging in a basket far down the mountain fissure.</p><p>Blent with peddlers of jewelry--sharp men cloaked in scarlet and blue, top-heavy under prodigious white turbans, and fully conscious of the power there is in the lustre of a ribbon and the incisive gleam of gold, whether in bracelet or necklace, or in rings for the finger or the nose--and with peddlers of household utensils, and with dealers in wearing-apparel, and with retailers of unguents for anointing the person, and with hucksters of all articles, fanciful as well as of need, hither and thither, tugging at halters and ropes, now screaming, now coaxing, toil the venders of animals--donkeys, horses, calves, sheep, bleating kids, and awkward camels; animals of every kind except the outlawed swine. All these are there; not singly, as described, but many times repeated; not in one place, but everywhere in the market.</p><p>Turning from this scene in the lane and court, this glance at the sellers and their commodities, the reader has need to give attention, in the next place, to visitors and buyers, for which the best studies will be found outside the gates, where the spectacle is quite as varied and animated; indeed, it may be more so, for there are superadded the effects of tent, booth, and sook, greater space, larger crowd, more unqualified freedom, and the glory of the Eastern sunshine.</p><p>CHAPTER VII</p><p>Let us take our stand by the gate, just out of the edge of the currents--one flowing in, the other out--and use our eyes and ears awhile.</p><p>In good time! Here come two men of a most noteworthy class.</p><p>&quot;Gods! How cold it is!&quot; says one of them, a powerful figure in armor; on his head a brazen helmet, on his body a shining breastplate and skirts of mail. &quot;How cold it is! Dost thou remember, my Caius, that vault in the Comitium at home which the flamens say is the entrance to the lower world? By Pluto! I could stand there this morning, long enough at least to get warm again!&quot;</p><p>The party addressed drops the hood of his military cloak, leaving bare his head and face, and replies, with an ironic smile, &quot;The helmets of the legions which conquered Mark Antony were full of Gallic snow; but thou--ah, my poor friend!--thou hast just come from Egypt, bringing its summer in thy blood.&quot;</p><p>And with the last word they disappear through the entrance. Though they had been silent, the armor and the sturdy step would have published them Roman soldiers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
The Jebel es Zubleh is a mountain fifty miles and more in length, and so narrow that its tracery on the map gives]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/the-jebel-es-zubleh-is-a-mountain-fifty-miles-and-more-in-length-and-so-narrow-that-its-tracery-on-the-map-gives</link>
            <guid>qN7IQbsLMWoC3qre2HTS</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 03:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[it a likeness to a caterpillar crawling from the south to the north. Standing on its red-and-white cliffs, and looking off under the path of the rising sun, one sees only the Desert of Arabia, where the east winds, so hateful to vinegrowers of Jericho, have kept their playgrounds since the beginning. Its feet are well covered by sands tossed from the Euphrates, there to lie, for the mountain is a wall to the pasture-lands of Moab and Ammon on the west--lands which else had been of the desert ...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it a likeness to a caterpillar crawling from the south to the north. Standing on its red-and-white cliffs, and looking off under the path of the rising sun, one sees only the Desert of Arabia, where the east winds, so hateful to vinegrowers of Jericho, have kept their playgrounds since the beginning. Its feet are well covered by sands tossed from the Euphrates, there to lie, for the mountain is a wall to the pasture-lands of Moab and Ammon on the west--lands which else had been of the desert a part.</p><p>The Arab has impressed his language upon everything south and east of Judea, so, in his tongue, the old Jebel is the parent of numberless wadies which, intersecting the Roman road--now a dim suggestion of what once it was, a dusty path for Syrian pilgrims to and from Mecca--run their furrows, deepening as they go, to pass the torrents of the rainy season into the Jordan, or their last receptacle, the Dead Sea. Out of one of these wadies--or, more particularly, out of that one which rises at the extreme end of the Jebel, and, extending east of north, becomes at length the bed of the Jabbok River--a traveller passed, going to the table-lands of the desert. To this person the attention of the reader is first besought.</p><p>Judged by his appearance, he was quite forty-five years old. His beard, once of the deepest black, flowing broadly over his breast, was streaked with white. His face was brown as a parched coffee-berry, and so hidden by a red kufiyeh (as the kerchief of the head is at this day called by the children of the desert) as to be but in part visible. Now and then he raised his eyes, and they were large and dark. He was clad in the flowing garments so universal in the East; but their style may not be described more particularly, for he sat under a miniature tent, and rode a great white dromedary.</p><p>It may be doubted if the people of the West ever overcome the impression made upon them by the first view of a camel equipped and loaded for the desert. Custom, so fatal to other novelties, affects this feeling but little. At the end of long journeys with caravans, after years of residence with the Bedawin, the Western-born, wherever they may be, will stop and wait the passing of the stately brute. The charm is not in the figure, which not even love can make beautiful; nor in the movement, the noiseless stepping, or the broad careen. As is the kindness of the sea to a ship, so that of the desert to its creature. It clothes him with all its mysteries; in such manner, too, that while we are looking at him we are thinking of them: therein is the wonder. The animal which now came out of the wady might well have claimed the customary homage. Its color and height; its breadth of foot; its bulk of body, not fat, but overlaid with muscle; its long, slender neck, of swanlike curvature; the head, wide between the eyes, and tapering to a muzzle which a lady&apos;s bracelet might have almost clasped; its motion, step long and elastic, tread sure and soundless--all certified its Syrian blood, old as the days of Cyrus, and absolutely priceless. There was the usual bridle, covering the forehead with scarlet fringe, and garnishing the throat with pendent brazen chains, each ending with a tinkling silver bell; but to the bridle there was neither rein for the rider nor strap for a driver. The furniture perched on the back was an invention which with any other people than of the East would have made the inventor renowned. It consisted of two wooden boxes, scarce four feet in length, balanced so that one hung at each side; the inner space, softly lined and carpeted, was arranged to allow the master to sit or lie half reclined; over it all was stretched a green awning. Broad back and breast straps, and girths, secured with countless knots and ties, held the device in place. In such manner the ingenious sons of Cush had contrived to make comfortable the sunburnt ways of the wilderness, along which lay their duty as often as their pleasure.</p><p>When the dromedary lifted itself out of the last break of the wady, the traveller had passed the boundary of El Belka, the ancient Ammon. It was morning-time. Before him was the sun, half curtained in fleecy mist; before him also spread the desert; not the realm of drifting sands, which was farther on, but the region where the herbage began to dwarf; where the surface is strewn with boulders of granite, and gray and brown stones, interspersed with languishing acacias and tufts of camel-grass. The oak, bramble, and arbutus lay behind, as if they had come to a line, looked over into the well-less waste and crouched with fear.</p><p>And now there was an end of path or road. More than ever the camel seemed insensibly driven; it lengthened and quickened its pace, its head pointed straight towards the horizon; through the wide nostrils it drank the wind in great draughts. The litter swayed, and rose and fell like a boat in the waves. Dried leaves in occasional beds rustled underfoot. Sometimes a perfume like absinthe sweetened all the air. Lark and chat and rock-swallow leaped to wing, and white partridges ran whistling and clucking out of the way. More rarely a fox or a hyena quickened his gallop, to study the intruders at a safe distance. Off to the right rose the hills of the Jebel, the pearl-gray veil resting upon them changing momentarily into a purple which the sun would make matchless a little later. Over their highest peaks a vulture sailed on broad wings into widening circles. But of all these things the tenant under the green tent saw nothing, or, at least, made no sign of recognition. His eyes were fixed and dreamy. The going of the man, like that of the animal, was as one being led.</p><p>For two hours the dromedary swung forward, keeping the trot steadily and the line due east. In that time the traveller never changed his position, nor looked to the right or left. On the desert, distance is not measured by miles or leagues, but by the saat, or hour, and the manzil, or halt: three and a half leagues fill the former, fifteen or twenty-five the latter; but they are the rates for the common camel. A carrier of the genuine Syrian stock can make three leagues easily. At full speed he overtakes the ordinary winds. As one of the results of the rapid advance, the face of the landscape underwent a change. The Jebel stretched along the western horizon, like a pale-blue ribbon. A tell, or hummock of clay and cemented sand, arose here and there. Now and then basaltic stones lifted their round crowns, outposts of the mountain against the forces of the plain; all else, however, was sand, sometimes smooth as the beaten beach, then heaped in rolling ridges; here chopped waves, there long swells. So, too, the condition of the atmosphere changed. The sun, high risen, had drunk his fill of dew and mist, and warmed the breeze that kissed the wanderer under the awning; far and near he was tinting the earth with faint milk-whiteness, and shimmering all the sky.</p><p>Two hours more passed without rest or deviation from the course. Vegetation entirely ceased. The sand, so crusted on the surface that it broke into rattling flakes at every step, held undisputed sway. The Jebel was out of view, and there was no landmark visible. The shadow that before followed had now shifted to the north, and was keeping even race with the objects which cast it; and as there was no sign of halting, the conduct of the traveller became each moment more strange.</p><p>No one, be it remembered, seeks the desert for a pleasure-ground. Life and business traverse it by paths along which the bones of things dead are strewn as so many blazons. Such are the roads from well to well, from pasture to pasture. The heart of the most veteran sheik beats quicker when he finds himself alone in the pathless tracts. So the man with whom we are dealing could not have been in search of pleasure; neither was his manner that of a fugitive; not once did he look behind him. In such situations fear and curiosity are the most common sensations; he was not moved by them. When men are lonely, they stoop to any companionship; the dog becomes a comrade, the horse a friend, and it is no shame to shower them with caresses and speeches of love. The camel received no such token, not a touch, not a word.</p><p>Exactly at noon the dromedary, of its own will, stopped, and uttered the cry or moan, peculiarly piteous, by which its kind always protest against an overload, and sometimes crave attention and rest. The master thereupon bestirred himself, waking, as it were, from sleep. He threw the curtains of the houdah up, looked at the sun, surveyed the country on every side long and carefully, as if to identify an appointed place. Satisfied with the inspection, he drew a deep breath and nodded, much as to say, &quot;At last, at last!&quot; A moment after, he crossed his hands upon his breast, bowed his head, and prayed silently. The pious duty done, he prepared to dismount. From his throat proceeded the sound heard doubtless by the favorite camels of Job--Ikh! ikh!--the signal to kneel. Slowly the animal obeyed, grunting the while. The rider then put his foot upon the slender neck, and stepped upon the sand.</p><p>CHAPTER II</p><p>The man as now revealed was of admirable proportions, not so tall as powerful. Loosening the silken rope which held the kufiyeh on his head, he brushed the fringed folds back until his face was bare--a strong face, almost negro in color; yet the low, broad forehead, aquiline nose, the outer corners of the eyes turned slightly upward, the hair profuse, straight, harsh, of metallic lustre, and falling to the shoulder in many plaits, were signs of origin impossible to disguise. So looked the Pharaohs and the later Ptolemies; so looked Mizraim, father of the Egyptian race. He wore the kamis, a white cotton shirt tight-sleeved, open in front, extending to the ankles and embroidered down the collar and breast, over which was thrown a brown woollen cloak, now, as in all probability it was then, called the aba, an outer garment with long skirt and short sleeves, lined inside with stuff of mixed cotton and silk, edged all round with a margin of clouded yellow. His feet were protected by sandals, attached by thongs of soft leather. A sash held the kamis to his waist. What was very noticeable, considering he was alone, and that the desert was the haunt of leopards and lions, and men quite as wild, he carried no arms, not even the crooked stick used for guiding camels; wherefore we may at least infer his errand peaceful, and that he was either uncommonly bold or under extraordinary protection.</p><p>The traveller&apos;s limbs were numb, for the ride had been long and wearisome; so he rubbed his hands and stamped his feet, and walked round the faithful servant, whose lustrous eyes were closing in calm content with the cud he had already found. Often, while making the circuit, he paused, and, shading his eyes with his hands, examined the desert to the extremest verge of vision; and always, when the survey was ended, his face clouded with disappointment, slight, but enough to advise a shrewd spectator that he was there expecting company, if not by appointment; at the same time, the spectator would have been conscious of a sharpening of the curiosity to learn what the business could be that required transaction in a place so far from civilized abode.</p><p>However disappointed, there could be little doubt of the stranger&apos;s confidence in the coming of the expected company. In token thereof, he went first to the litter, and, from the cot or box opposite the one he had occupied in coming, produced a sponge and a small gurglet of water, with which he washed the eyes, face, and nostrils of the camel; that done, from the same depository he drew a circular cloth, red-and white-striped, a bundle of rods, and a stout cane. The latter, after some manipulation, proved to be a cunning device of lesser joints, one within another, which, when united together, formed a centre pole higher than his head. When the pole was planted, and the rods set around it, he spread the cloth over them, and was literally at home--a home much smaller than the habitations of emir and sheik, yet their counterpart in all other respects. From the litter again he brought a carpet or square rug, and covered the floor of the tent on the side from the sun. That done, he went out, and once more, and with greater care and more eager eyes, swept the encircling country. Except a distant jackal, galloping across the plain, and an eagle flying towards the Gulf of Akaba, the waste below, like the blue above it, was lifeless.</p><p>He turned to the camel, saying low, and in a tongue strange to the desert, &quot;We are far from home, O racer with the swiftest winds--we are far from home, but God is with us. Let us be patient.&quot;</p><p>Then he took some beans from a pocket in the saddle, and put them in a bag made to hang below the animal&apos;s nose; and when he saw the relish with which the good servant took to the food, he turned and again scanned the world of sand, dim with the glow of the vertical sun.</p><p>&quot;They will come &quot; he said, calmly. &quot;He that led me is leading them. I will make ready.&quot;</p><p>From the pouches which lined the interior of the cot, and from a willow basket which was part of its furniture, he brought forth materials for a meal: platters close-woven of the fibres of palms; wine in small gurglets of skin; mutton dried and smoked; stoneless shami, or Syrian pomegranates; dates of El Shelebi, wondrous rich and grown in the nakhil, or palm orchards, of Central Arabia; cheese, like David&apos;s &quot;slices of milk;&quot; and leavened bread from the city bakery--all which he carried and set upon the carpet under the tent. As the final preparation, about the provisions he laid three pieces of silk cloth, used among refined people of the East to cover the knees of guests while at table--a circumstance significant of the number of persons who were to partake of his entertainment--the number he was awaiting.</p><p>All was now ready. He stepped out: lo! in the east a dark speck on the face of the desert. He stood as if rooted to the ground; his eyes dilated; his flesh crept chilly, as if touched by something supernatural. The speck grew; became large as a hand; at length assumed defined proportions. A little later, full into view swung a duplication of his own dromedary, tall and white, and bearing a houdah, the travelling litter of Hindostan. Then the Egyptian crossed his hands upon his breast, and looked to heaven.</p><p>&quot;God only is great!&quot; he exclaimed, his eyes full of tears, his soul in awe.</p><p>The stranger drew nigh--at last stopped. Then he, too, seemed just waking. He beheld the kneeling camel, the tent, and the man standing prayerfully at the door. He crossed his hands, bent his head, and prayed silently; after which, in a little while, he stepped from his camel&apos;s neck to the sand, and advanced towards the Egyptian, as did the Egyptian towards him. A moment they looked at each other; then they embraced--that is, each threw his right arm over the other&apos;s shoulder, and the left round the side, placing his chin first upon the left, then upon the right breast.</p><p>&quot;Peace be with thee, O servant of the true God!&quot; the stranger said.</p><p>&quot;And to thee, O brother of the true faith!--to thee peace and welcome,&quot; the Egyptian replied, with fervor.</p><p>The new-comer was tall and gaunt, with lean face, sunken eyes, white hair and beard, and a complexion between the hue of cinnamon and bronze. He, too, was unarmed. His costume was Hindostani; over the skull-cap a shawl was wound in great folds, forming a turban; his body garments were in the style of the Egyptian&apos;s, except that the aba was shorter, exposing wide flowing breeches gathered at the ankles. In place of sandals, his feet were clad in half-slippers of red leather, pointed at the toes. Save the slippers, the costume from head to foot was of white linen. The air of the man was high, stately, severe. Visvamitra, the greatest of the ascetic heroes of the Iliad of the East, had in him a perfect representative. He might have been called a Life drenched with the wisdom of Brahma--Devotion Incarnate. Only in his eyes was there proof of humanity; when he lifted his face from the Egyptian&apos;s breast, they were glistening with tears.</p><p>&quot;God only is great!&quot; he exclaimed, when the embrace was finished.</p><p>&quot;And blessed are they that serve him!&quot; the Egyptian answered, wondering at the paraphrase of his own exclamation. &quot;But let us wait,&quot; he added, &quot;let us wait; for see, the other comes yonder!&quot;</p><p>They looked to the north, where, already plain to view, a third camel, of the whiteness of the others, came careening like a ship. They waited, standing together--waited until the new-comer arrived, dismounted, and advanced towards them.</p><p>&quot;Peace to you, O my brother!&quot; he said, while embracing the Hindoo.</p><p>And the Hindoo answered, &quot;God&apos;s will be done!&quot;</p><p>The last comer was all unlike his friends: his frame was slighter; his complexion white; a mass of waving light hair was a perfect crown for his small but beautiful head; the warmth of his dark-blue eyes certified a delicate mind, and a cordial, brave nature. He was bareheaded and unarmed. Under the folds of the Tyrian blanket which he wore with unconscious grace appeared a tunic, short-sleeved and low-necked, gathered to the waist by a band, and reaching nearly to the knee; leaving the neck, arms, and legs bare. Sandals guarded his feet. Fifty years, probably more, had spent themselves upon him, with no other effect, apparently, than to tinge his demeanor with gravity and temper his words with forethought. The physical organization and the brightness of soul were untouched. No need to tell the student from what kindred he was sprung; if he came not himself from the groves of Athene&apos;, his ancestry did.</p><p>When his arms fell from the Egyptian, the latter said, with a tremulous voice, &quot;The Spirit brought me first; wherefore I know myself chosen to be the servant of my brethren. The tent is set, and the bread is ready for the breaking. Let me perform my office.&quot;</p><p>Taking each by the hand, he led them within, and removed their sandals and washed their feet, and he poured water upon their hands, and dried them with napkins.</p><p>Then, when he had laved his own hands, he said, &quot;Let us take care of ourselves, brethren, as our service requires, and eat, that we may be strong for what remains of the day&apos;s duty. While we eat, we will each learn who the others are, and whence they come, and how they are called.&quot;</p><p>He took them to the repast, and seated them so that they faced each other. Simultaneously their heads bent forward, their hands crossed upon their breasts, and, speaking together, they said aloud this simple grace:</p><p>&quot;Father of all--God!--what we have here is of thee; take our thanks and bless us, that we may continue to do thy will.&quot;</p><p>With the last word they raised their eyes, and looked at each other in wonder. Each had spoken in a language never before heard by the others; yet each understood perfectly what was said. Their souls thrilled with divine emotion; for by the miracle they recognized the Divine Presence.</p><p>CHAPTER III</p><p>To speak in the style of the period, the meeting just described took place in the year of Rome 747. The month was December, and winter reigned over all the regions east of the Mediterranean. Such as ride upon the desert in this season go not far until smitten with a keen appetite. The company under the little tent were not exceptions to the rule. They were hungry, and ate heartily; and, after the wine, they talked.</p><p>&quot;To a wayfarer in a strange land nothing is so sweet as to hear his name on the tongue of a friend,&quot; said the Egyptian, who assumed to be president of the repast. &quot;Before us lie many days of companionship. It is time we knew each other. So, if it be agreeable, he who came last shall be first to speak.&quot;</p><p>Then, slowly at first, like one watchful of himself, the Greek began:</p><p>&quot;What I have to tell, my brethren, is so strange that I hardly know where to begin or what I may with propriety speak. I do not yet understand myself. The most I am sure of is that I am doing a Master&apos;s will, and that the service is a constant ecstasy. When I think of the purpose I am sent to fulfil, there is in me a joy so inexpressible that I know the will is God&apos;s.&quot;</p><p>The good man paused, unable to proceed, while the others, in sympathy with his feelings, dropped their gaze.</p><p>&quot;Far to the west of this,&quot; he began again, &quot;there is a land which may never be forgotten; if only because the world is too much its debtor, and because the indebtedness is for things that bring to men their purest pleasures. I will say nothing of the arts, nothing of philosophy, of eloquence, of poetry, of war: O my brethren, hers is the glory which must shine forever in perfected letters, by which He we go to find and proclaim will be made known to all the earth. The land I speak of is Greece. I am Gaspar, son of Cleanthes the Athenian.</p><p>&quot;My people,&quot; he continued, &quot;were given wholly to study, and from them I derived the same passion. It happens that two of our philosophers, the very greatest of the many, teach, one the doctrine of a Soul in every man, and its Immortality; the other the doctrine of One God, infinitely just. From the multitude of subjects about which the schools were disputing, I separated them, as alone worth the labor of solution; for I thought there was a relation between God and the soul as yet unknown. On this theme the mind can reason to a point, a dead, impassable wall; arrived there, all that remains is to stand and cry aloud for help. So I did; but no voice came to me over the wall. In despair, I tore myself from the cities and the schools.&quot;</p><p>At these words a grave smile of approval lighted the gaunt face of the Hindoo.</p><p>&quot;In the northern part of my country--in Thessaly,&quot; the Greek proceeded to say, &quot;there is a mountain famous as the home of the gods, where Theus, whom my countrymen believe supreme, has his abode; Olympus is its name. Thither I betook myself. I found a cave in a hill where the mountain, coming from the west, bends to the southeast; there I dwelt, giving myself up to meditation--no, I gave myself up to waiting for what every breath was a prayer--for revelation. Believing in God, invisible yet supreme, I also believed it possible so to yearn for him with all my soul that he would take compassion and give me answer.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And he did--he did!&quot; exclaimed the Hindoo, lifting his hands from the silken cloth upon his lap.</p><p>&quot;Hear me, brethren,&quot; said the Greek, calming himself with an effort. &quot;The door of my hermitage looks over an arm of the sea, over the Thermaic Gulf. One day I saw a man flung overboard from a ship sailing by. He swam ashore. I received and took care of him. He was a Jew, learned in the history and laws of his people; and from him I came to know that the God of my prayers did indeed exist; and had been for ages their lawmaker, ruler, and king. What was that but the Revelation I dreamed of? My faith had not been fruitless; God answered me!&quot;</p><p>&quot;As he does all who cry to him with such faith,&quot; said the Hindoo.</p><p>&quot;But, alas!&quot; the Egyptian added, &quot;how few are there wise enough to know when he answers them!&quot;</p><p>&quot;That was not all,&quot; the Greek continued. &quot;The man so sent to me told me more. He said the prophets who, in the ages which followed the first revelation, walked and talked with God, declared he would come again. He gave me the names of the prophets, and from the sacred books quoted their very language. He told me, further, that the second coming was at hand--was looked for momentarily in Jerusalem.&quot;</p><p>The Greek paused, and the brightness of his countenance faded.</p><p>&quot;It is true,&quot; he said, after a little--&quot;it is true the man told me that as God and the revelation of which he spoke had been for the Jews alone, so it would be again. He that was to come should be King of the Jews. &apos;Had he nothing for the rest of the world?&apos; I asked. &apos;No,&apos; was the answer, given in a proud voice--&apos;No, we are his chosen people.&apos; The answer did not crush my hope. Why should such a God limit his love and benefaction to one land, and, as it were, to one family? I set my heart upon knowing. At last I broke through the man&apos;s pride, and found that his fathers had been merely chosen servants to keep the Truth alive, that the world might at last know it and be saved. When the Jew was gone, and I was alone again, I chastened my soul with a new prayer--that I might be permitted to see the King when he was come, and worship him. One night I sat by the door of my cave trying to get nearer the mysteries of my existence, knowing which is to know God; suddenly, on the sea below me, or rather in the darkness that covered its face, I saw a star begin to burn; slowly it arose and drew nigh, and stood over the hill and above my door, so that its light shone full upon me. I fell down, and slept, and in my dream I heard a voice say:</p><p>&quot;&apos;O Gaspar! Thy faith hath conquered! Blessed art thou! With two others, come from the uttermost parts of the earth, thou shalt see Him that is promised, and be a witness for him, and the occasion of testimony in his behalf. In the morning arise, and go meet them, and keep trust in the Spirit that shall guide thee.&apos;</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[When I found how very superior a person your daughter was!" "It isn't a month since she was engaged to somebody else]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/when-i-found-how-very-superior-a-person-your-daughter-was-it-isn-t-a-month-since-she-was-engaged-to-somebody-else</link>
            <guid>okpSv6wxwNw5e0YdMlhU</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[said the angry father, forgetting all propriety in his indignation. "Gertrude?" demanded Captain Batsby. "You are two fools. So you gave up my niece?" "Oh dear yes, altogether. She didn&apos;t come to Merle Park, you know. How was I to say anything to her when you didn&apos;t have her there?" "Why didn&apos;t you go away then, instead of remaining under a false pretence? Or why, at any rate, didn&apos;t you tell me the truth?" "And what would you have me to do now?" asked Captain Batsby. "Go ...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>said the angry father, forgetting all propriety in his indignation. &quot;Gertrude?&quot; demanded Captain Batsby.</p><p>&quot;You are two fools. So you gave up my niece?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh dear yes, altogether. She didn&apos;t come to Merle Park, you know. How was I to say anything to her when you didn&apos;t have her there?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Why didn&apos;t you go away then, instead of remaining under a false pretence? Or why, at any rate, didn&apos;t you tell me the truth?&quot; &quot;And what would you have me to do now?&quot; asked Captain Batsby. &quot;Go to the d -- &quot; said Sir Thomas, as he left the room, and went to his daughter&apos;s chamber.</p><p>Gertrude had heard that her father was in the house, and endeavoured to hurry herself into her clothes while the interview was going on between him and her father. But she was not yet perfectly arrayed when her father burst into her room. &quot;Oh, papa,&quot; she said, going down on her knees, &quot;you do mean to forgive us?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I mean to do nothing of the kind. I mean to carry you home and have you locked up.&quot;</p><p>&quot;But we may be married!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Not with my leave. Why didn&apos;t you come and ask if you wanted to get yourselves married? Why didn&apos;t you tell me?&quot;</p><p>&quot;We were ashamed.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What has become of Mr Houston, whom you loved so dearly?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, papa!&quot;</p><p>&quot;And the Captain was so much attached to Ayala!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, papa!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Get up, you stupid girl. Why is it that my children are so much more foolish than other people&apos;s? I don&apos;t suppose you care for the man in the least.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I do, I do. I love him with all my heart.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And as for him -- how can he care for you when it is but the other day he was in love with your cousin?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, papa!&quot;</p><p>&quot;What he wants is my money, of course.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He has got plenty of money, papa.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I can understand him, fool as he is. There is something for him to get. He won&apos;t get it, but he might think it possible. As for you, I cannot understand you at all. What do you expect? It can&apos;t be for love of a hatchet-faced fellow like that, whom you had never seen a fortnight ago.&quot;</p><p>&quot;It is more than a month ago, papa.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Frank Houston was, at any rate, a manly-looking fellow.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He was a scoundrel,&quot; said Gertrude, now standing up for the first time.</p><p>&quot;A good-looking fellow was Frank Houston; that at least may be said for him,&quot; continued the father, determined to exasperate his daughter to the utmost. &quot;I had half a mind to give way about him, because he was a manly, outspoken fellow, though he was such an idle dog. If you&apos;d gone off with him, I could have understood it -- and perhaps forgiven it,&quot; he added.</p><p>&quot;He was a scoundrel!&quot; screamed Gertrude, remembering her ineffectual attempts to make her former lover perform this same journey. &quot;But this fellow! I cannot bring myself to believe that you really care for him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He has a good income of his own, while Houston was little better than a beggar.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I&apos;m glad of that,&quot; said Sir Thomas, &quot;because there will be something for you to live upon. I can assure you that Captain Batsby will never get a shilling of my money. Now, you had better finish dressing yourself, and come down and eat your dinner with me if you&apos;ve got any appetite. You will have to go back to Dover by the boat tonight.&quot;</p><p>&quot;May Ben dine with us?&quot; asked Gertrude, timidly. &quot;Ben may go to the d -- . At any rate he had better not show himself to me again,&quot; said Sir Thomas.</p><p>The lovers, however, did get an opportunity of exchanging a few words, during which it was settled between them that as the young lady must undoubtedly obey her father&apos;s behests, and return to Dover that night, it would be well for Captain Batsby to remain behind at Ostend. Indeed, he spoke of making a little tour as far as Brussels, in order that he might throw off the melancholy feelings which had been engendered. &quot;You will come to me again, Ben,&quot; she said. Upon this he looked very grave. &quot;You do not mean to say that after all this you will desert me?&quot;</p><p>&quot;He has insulted me so horribly!&quot;</p><p>&quot;What does that signify? Of course he is angry. If you could only hear how he has insulted me.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He says that you were in love with somebody else not a month since.&quot;</p><p>&quot;So were you, Ben, for the matter of that.&quot; He did, however, before they parted, make her a solemn promise that their engagement should remain an established fact, in spite both of father and mother.</p><p>Gertrude, who had now recovered the effects of her seasickness -- which, however, she would have to encounter again so very quickly -- contrived to eat a hearty dinner with her father. There, however, arose a little trouble. How should she contrive to pack up the clothes which she had brought with her, and which had till lately been mixed with the Captain&apos;s garments? She did, however, at last succeed in persuading the chamber-maid to furnish her with a carpet-bag, with which in her custody she arrived safely on the following day at Merle Park.</p><p>CHAPTER 49 THE NEW FROCK</p><p>Ayala&apos;s arrival at Stalham was full of delight to her. There was Nina with all her new-fledged hopes and her perfect assurance in the absolute superiority of Lord George Bideford to any other man either alive or dead. Ayala was quite willing to allow this assurance to pass current, as her Angel of Light was as yet neither alive nor dead. But she was quite certain -- wholly certain -- that when the Angel should come forth he would be superior to Lord George. The first outpourings of all this took place in the carriage as Nina and Ayala were driven from the station to the house, while the Colonel went home alone in a dog-cart. It had been arranged that nothing should be said to Ayala about the Colonel, and in the carriage the Colonel&apos;s name was not mentioned. But when they were all in the hall at Stalham, taking off their cloaks and depositing their wraps, standing in front of the large fire, Colonel Stubbs was there. Lady Albury was present also, welcoming her guests, and Sir Harry, who had already come home from hunting, with one or two other men in red coats and top breeches, and a small bevy of ladies who were staying in the house. Lady Albury was anxious to know how her friend had sped with Ayala, but at such a moment no question could be asked. But Ayala&apos;s spirits were so high that Lady Albury was at a loss to understand whether the whole thing had been settled by Jonathan with success -- or whether, on the other hand, Ayala was so happy because she had not been troubled by a word of love.</p><p>&quot;He has behaved so badly, Lady Albury,&quot; said Ayala.</p><p>&quot;What -- Stubbs?&quot; asked Sir Harry, not quite understanding all the ins and outs of the matter.</p><p>&quot;Yes, Sir Harry. There was an old lady and an old gentleman. They were very funny and he would laugh at them.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I deny it,&quot; said the Colonel.</p><p>&quot;Why shouldn&apos;t he laugh at them if they were funny?&quot; asked Lady Albury.</p><p>&quot;He knew it would make me laugh out loud. I couldn&apos;t help myself, but he could be as grave as a judge all the time. So he went on till the old woman scolded me dreadfully.&quot;</p><p>&quot;But the old man took your part,&quot; said the Colonel.</p><p>&quot;Yes -- he did. He said that I was ornamental.&quot;</p><p>&quot;A decent and truth-speaking old gentleman,&quot; said one of the sportsmen in top boots.</p><p>&quot;Quite so -- but then the old lady said that I was perverse, and Colonel Stubbs took her part. If you had been there, Lady Albury, you would have thought that he had been in earnest.&quot; &quot;So I was,&quot; said the Colonel.</p><p>All this was very pleasant to Ayala. It was a return to the old joyousness when she had first discovered the delight of having such a friend as Colonel Stubbs. Had he flattered her, paid her compliments, been soft and delicate to her -- as a lover might have been -- she would have been troubled in spirit and heavy at heart. But now it seemed as though all that love-making had been an episode which had passed away, and that the old pleasant friendship still remained. As yet, while they were standing there in the hall, there had come no moment for her to feel whether there was anything to regret in this. But certainly there had been comfort in it. She had been able to appear before all her Stalham friends, in the presence even of the man himself, without any of that consciousness which would have oppressed her had he come there simply as her acknowledged lover, and had she come there conscious before all the guests that it was so.</p><p>Then they sat for a while drinking tea and eating buttered toast in the drawing-room. A supply of buttered toast fully to gratify the wants of three or four men just home from hunting has never yet been created by the resources of any establishment. But the greater marvel is that the buttered toast has never the slightest effect on the dinner which is to follow in an hour or two. During this period the conversation turned chiefly upon hunting -- which is of all subjects the most imperious. It never occurs to a hunting man to suppose that either a lady, or a bishop, or a political economist, can be indifferent to hunting. There is something beyond millinery -- beyond the interests of the church -- beyond the price of wheat -- in that great question whether the hounds did or did not change their fox in Gobblegoose Wood. On the present occasion Sir Harry was quite sure that the hounds did carry their fox through Gobblegoose Wood, whereas Captain Glomax, who had formerly been master of the pack which now obeyed Sir Harry, was perfectly certain that they had got upon another animal, who went away from Gobblegoose as fresh as paint. He pretended even to ridicule Sir Harry for supposing that any fox could have run at that pace up Buddlecombe Hill who had travelled all the way from Stickborough Gorse. To this Sir Harry replied resentfully that the Captain did not know what were the running powers of a dog-fox in March. Then he told various stories of what had been done in this way at this special period of the year. Glomax, however, declared that he knew as much of a fox as any man in England, and that he would eat both the foxes, and the wood, and Sir Harry, and, finally, himself, if the animal which had run up Buddlecombe Hill was the same which they brought with them from Stickborough Gorse into Gobblegoose Wood. So the battle raged, and the ladies no doubt were much interested -- as would have been the bishop had he been there, or the political economist. After this Ayala was taken up into her room, and left to sit there by herself for a while till Lady Albury should send her maid. &quot;My dear,&quot; said Lady Albury, &quot;there is something on the bed which I expect you to wear tonight. I shall be broken-hearted if it doesn&apos;t fit you. The frock is a present from Sir Harry; the scarf comes from me. Don&apos;t say a word about it. Sir Harry always likes to make presents to young ladies.&quot; Then she hurried out of the room while Ayala was still thanking her. Lady Albury had at first intended to say something about the Colonel as they were sitting together over Ayala&apos;s fire, but she had made up her mind against this as soon as she saw their manner towards each other on entering the house. If Ayala had accepted him at a word as they were travelling together, then there would be need of no further interference in the matter. But if not, it would be better that she should hold her peace for the present. Ayala&apos;s first instinct was to look at the finery which had been provided for her. It was a light grey silk, almost pearl colour, as to which she thought she had never seen anything so lovely before. She measured the waist with her eye, and knew at once that it would fit her. She threw the gauzy scarf over her shoulders and turned herself round before the large mirror which stood near the fireplace. &quot;Dear Lady Albury!&quot; she exclaimed; &quot;dear Lady Albury!&quot; It was impossible that she should have understood that Lady Albury&apos;s affection had been shown to Jonathan Stubbs much rather than to her when those presents were prepared.</p><p>She got rid of her travelling dress and her boots, and let down her hair, and seated herself before the fire that she might think of it all in her solitude. Was she or was she not glad -- glad in sober earnest, glad now the moment of her mirth had passed by, the mirth which had made her return to Stalham so easy for her -- was she or was she not glad that this change had come upon the Colonel, this return to his old ways? She had got her friend again, but she had lost her lover. She did not want the lover. She was sure of that. She was still sure that if a lover would come to her who would be in truth acceptable -- such a lover as would enable her to give herself up to him altogether, and submit herself to him as her lord and master -- he must be something different from Jonathan Stubbs. That had been the theory of her life for many months past, a theory on which she had resolved to rely with all her might from the moment in which this man had spoken to her of his love. Would she give way and render up herself and all her dreams simply because the man was one to be liked? She had declared to herself again and again that it should not be so. There should come the Angel of Light or there should come no lover for her. On that very morning as she was packing up her boxes at Kingsbury Crescent she had arranged the words in which, should he speak to her on the subject in the railway train, she would make him understand that it could never be. Surely he would understand if she told him so simply, with a little prayer that his suit might not be repeated. His suit had not been repeated. Nothing apparently had been further from his intention. He had been droll, pleasant, friendly -- just like his old dear self. For in truth the pleasantness and the novelty of his friendship had made him dear to her. He had gone back of his own accord to the old ways, without any little prayer from her. Now was she contented? As the question would thrust itself upon her in opposition to her own will, driving out the thoughts which she would fain have welcomed, she gazed listlessly at the fire. If it were so, then for what purpose, then for what reason, had Lady Albury procured for her the pale grey pearl-coloured dress?</p><p>And why were all these grand people at Stalham so good to her -- to her, a poor little girl, whose ordinary life was devoted to the mending of linen and to the furtherance of economy in the use of pounds of butter and legs of mutton? Why was she taken out of her own sphere and petted in this new luxurious world? She had a knowledge belonging to her -- if not quite what we may call common sense -- which told her that there must be some cause. Of some intellectual capacity, some appreciation of things and words which were divine in their beauty, she was half conscious. It could not be, she felt, that without some such capacity she should have imaged to herself that Angel of Light. But not for such capacity as that had she been made welcome at Stalham. As for her prettiness, her beauty of face and form, she thought about them not at all -- almost not at all. In appearing in that pale-pearl silk, with that gauzy scarf upon her shoulders, she would take pride. Not to be shamed among other girls by the poorness of her apparel was a pride to her. Perhaps to excel some others by the prettiness of her apparel might be a pride to her. But of feminine beauty, as a great gift bestowed upon her, she thought not at all. She would look in the mirror for the effect of the scarf, but not for the effect of the neck and shoulders beneath it. Could she have looked in any mirror for the effect of the dreams she had thus dreamed -- ah! that would have been the mirror in which she would have loved yet feared to look!</p><p>Why was Lady Albury so kind to her? Perhaps Lady Albury did not know that Colonel Stubbs had changed his mind. She would know it very soon, and then, maybe, everything would be changed. As she thought of this she longed to put the pearl silk dress aside, and not to wear it as yet -- to put it aside so that it might never be worn by her if circumstances should so require. It was to be hoped that the man had changed his mind -- and to be hoped that Lady Albury would know that he had done so. Then she would soon see whether there was a change. Could she not give a reason why she should not wear the dress this night? As she sat gazing at the fire a tear ran down her cheek. Was it for the dress she would not wear, or for the lover whom she would not love?</p><p>The question as to the dress was settled for her very soon. Lady Albury&apos;s maid came into the room -- not a chit of a girl without a thought of her own except as to her own grandness in being two steps higher than the kitchen-maid -- but a well-grown, buxom, powerful woman, who had no idea of letting such a young lady as Ayala do anything in the matter of dress but what she told her. When Ayala suggested something as to the next evening in reference to the pale-pearl silk the buxom powerful woman pooh-poohed her down in a moment. What -- after Sir Harry had taken so much trouble about having it made; having actually inquired about it with his own mouth. &quot;Tonight, Miss; you must wear it tonight! My lady would be quite angry!&quot; &quot;My lady not know what you wear! My lady knows what all the ladies wear -- morning, noon, and night.&quot; That little plan of letting the dress lie by till she should know how she should be received after Colonel Stubbs&apos;s change of mind had been declared, fell to the ground altogether under the hands of the buxom powerful woman.</p><p>When she went into the drawing-room some of the guests were assembled. Sir Harry and Lady Albury were there, and so was Colonel Stubbs. As she walked in Sir Harry was standing well in front of the fire, in advance of the rug, so as to be almost in the middle of the room. Captain Glomax was there also, and the discussion about the foxes was going on. It had occurred to Ayala that as the dress was a present from Sir Harry she must thank him. So she walked up to him and made a little curtsey just before him. &quot;Am I nice, Sir Harry?&quot; she said.</p><p>&quot;Upon my word&quot;, said Sir Harry, &quot;that is the best spent ten-pound note I ever laid out in my life.&quot; Then he took her by the hand and gently turned her round, so as to look at her and her dress. &quot;I don&apos;t know whether I am nice, but you are,&quot; she said, curtseying again. Everybody felt that she had had quite a little triumph as she subsided into a seat close by Lady Albury, who called her. As she seated herself she caught the Colonel&apos;s eye, who was looking at her. She fancied that there was a tear in it. Then he turned himself and looked away into the fire.</p><p>&quot;You have won his heart for ever,&quot; said Lady Albury.</p><p>&quot;Whose heart?&quot; asked Ayala, in her confusion.</p><p>&quot;Sir Harry&apos;s heart. As for the other, cela va sans dire. You must go on wearing it every night for a week or Sir Harry will want to know why you have left it off. If the woman had made it on you it couldn&apos;t have fitted better. Baker&apos; -- Baker was the buxom female -- &quot;said that she knew it was right.You did that very prettily to Sir Harry. Now go up and ask Colonel Stubbs what he thinks of it.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Indeed, I won&apos;t,&quot; said Ayala. Lady Albury, a few minutes afterwards, when she saw Ayala walking away towards the drawing-room leaning on the Colonel&apos;s arm, acknowledged to herself that she did at last understand it. The Colonel had been able to see it all, even without the dress, and she confessed in her mind that the Colonel had eyes with which to see, and ears with which to hear, and a judgment with which to appreciate. &quot;Don&apos;t you think that girl very lovely?&quot; she said to Lord Rufford, on whose arm she was leaning.</p><p>&quot;Something almost more than lovely,&quot; said Lord Rufford, with unwonted enthusiasm.</p><p>It was acknowledged now by everybody. &quot;Is it true about Colonel Stubbs and Miss Dormer?&quot; whispered Lady Rufford to her hostess in the drawing-room.</p><p>&quot;Upon my word, I never inquire into those things,&quot; said Lady Albury. &quot;I suppose he does admire her. Everybody must admire her.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh yes;&quot; said Lady Rufford. &quot;She is certainly very pretty. Who is she, Lady Albury?&quot; Lady Rufford had been a Miss Penge, and the Penges were supposed to be direct descendants from Boadicea. &quot;She is Miss Ayala Dormer. Her father was an artist, and her mother was a very handsome woman. When a girl is as beautiful as Miss Dormer, and as clever, it doesn&apos;t much signify who she is.&quot; Then the direct descendant from Boadicea withdrew holding an opinion much at variance with that expressed by her hostess. &quot;Who is that young lady who sat next to you?&quot; asked Captain Glomax of Colonel Stubbs, after the ladies had gone.</p><p>&quot;She is a Miss Ayala Dormer.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Did I not see her out hunting with you once or twice early in the season?&quot;</p><p>&quot;You saw her out hunting, no doubt, and I was there. I did not specially bring her. She was staying here, and rode one of Albury&apos;s horses.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Take her top and bottom, and all round,&quot; said Captain Glomax, &quot;she is the prettiest little thing I&apos;ve seen for many a day. When she curtseyed to Sir Harry in the drawing-room I almost thought that I should like to be a marrying man myself.&quot; Stubbs did not carry on the conversation, having felt displeased rather than otherwise by the admiration expressed.</p><p>&quot;I didn&apos;t quite understand before&quot;, said Sir Harry to his wife that night, &quot;what it was that made Jonathan so furious about that girl; but I think I see it now.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Fine feathers make fine birds,&quot; said his wife, laughing.</p><p>&quot;Feathers ever so fine,&quot; said Sir Harry, &quot;don&apos;t make well-bred birds.&quot;</p><p>&quot;To tell the truth,&quot; said Lady Albury, &quot;I think we shall all have to own that Jonathan has been right.&quot;</p><p>This took place upstairs, but before they left the drawing-room Lady Albury whispered a few words to her young friend. &quot;We have had a terrible trouble about you, Ayala.&quot;</p><p>&quot;A trouble about me, Lady Albury? I should be so sorry.&quot;</p><p>&quot;It is not exactly your fault -- but we haven&apos;t at all known what to do with that unfortunate man.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What man?&quot; asked Ayala, forgetful at the moment of all men except Colonel Stubbs.</p><p>&quot;You naughty girl! Don&apos;t you know that my brother-in-law is broken-hearted about you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Captain Batsby!&quot; whispered Ayala, in her faintest voice.</p><p>&quot;Yes; Captain Batsby. A Captain has as much right to be considered as a Colonel in such a matter as this.&quot; Here Ayala frowned, but said nothing. &quot;Of course, I can&apos;t help it, who may break his heart, but poor Ben is always supposed to be at Stalham just at this time of the year, and now I have been obliged to tell him one fib upon another to keep him away. When he comes to know it all, what on earth will he say to me?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I am sure it has not been my fault,&quot; said Ayala.</p><p>&quot;That&apos;s what young ladies always say when gentlemen break their hearts.&quot;</p><p>When Ayala was again in her room, and had got rid of the buxom female who came to assist her in taking off her new finery, she was aware of having passed the evening triumphantly. She was conscious of admiration. She knew that Sir Harry had been pleased by her appearance. She was sure that Lady Albury was satisfied with her, and she had seen something in the Colonel&apos;s glance that made her feel that he had not been indifferent. But in their conversation at the dinner table he had said nothing which any other man might not have said, if any other man could have made himself as agreeable. Those hunting days were all again described with their various incidents, with the great triumph over the brook, and Twentyman&apos;s wife and baby, and fat Lord Rufford, who was at the moment sitting there opposite to them; and the ball in London, with the lady who was thrown out of the window; and the old gentleman and the old lady of today who had been so peculiar in their remarks. There had been nothing else in their conversation, and it surely was not possible that a man who intended to put himself forward as a lover should have talked in such fashion as that! But then there were other things which occurred to her. Why had there been that tear in his eye? And that &quot;cela va sans dire&quot; which had come from Lady Albury in her railing mood -- what had that meant? Lady Albury, when she said that, could not have known that the Colonel had changed his purpose.</p><p>But, after all, what is a dress, let it be ever so pretty? The Angel of Light would not care for her dress, let her wear what she might. Were he to seek her because of her dress, he would not be the Angel of Light of whom she had dreamed. It was not by any dress that she could prevail over him. She did rejoice because of her little triumph -- but she knew that she rejoiced because she was not an Angel of Light herself. Her only chance lay in this, that the angels of yore did come down from heaven to ask for love and worship from the daughters of men.</p><p>As she went to bed, she determined that she would still be true to her dream. Not because folk admired a new frock would she be ready to give herself to a man who was only a man -- a man of the earth really; who had about him no more than a few of the real attributes of an Angel of Light.</p><p>CHAPTER 50 GOBBLEGOOSE WOOD ON SUNDAY</p><p>The next two days were not quite so triumphant to Ayala as had been the evening of her arrival.</p><p>There was hunting on both of those days, the gentlemen having gone on the Friday away out of Sir Harry&apos;s country to the Brake hounds. Ayala and the Colonel had arrived on the Thursday. Ayala had not expected to be asked to hunt again -- had not even thought about it. It had been arranged before on Nina&apos;s account, and Nina now was not to hunt any more. Lord George did not altogether approve of it, and Nina was quite in accord with Lord George -- though she had held up her whip and shaken it in triumph when she jumped over the Cranbury Brook. And the horse which Ayala had ridden was no longer in the stables. &quot;My dear, I am so sorry; but I&apos;m afraid we can&apos;t mount you,&quot; Lady Albury said. In answer to this Ayala declared that she had not thought of it for a moment. But yet the days seemed to be dull with her. Lady Rufford was -- well -- perhaps a little patronising to her, and patronage such as that was not at all to Ayala&apos;s taste. &quot;Lady Albury seems to be quite a kind friend to you,&quot; Lady Rufford said. Nothing could be more true. The idea implied was true also -- the idea that such a one as Ayala was much in luck&apos;s way to find such a friend as Lady Albury. It was true no doubt; but, nevertheless, it was ungracious, and had to be resented. &quot;A very kind friend, indeed. Some people only make friends of those who are as grand as themselves.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I am sure we should be very glad to see you at Rufford if you remain long in the country,&quot; said Lady Rufford, a little time afterwards. But even in this there was not a touch of that cordiality which might have won Ayala&apos;s heart. &quot;I am not at all likely to stay,&quot; said Ayala. &quot;I live with my uncle and aunt at Notting Hill, and I very rarely go away from home.&quot; Lady Rufford, however, did not quite understand it. It had been whispered to her that morning that Ayala was certainly going to marry Colonel Stubbs; and, if so, why should she not come to Rufford?</p><p>On that day, the Friday, she was taken in to dinner by Captain Glomax. &quot;I remember quite as if it were yesterday,&quot; said the Captain. &quot;It was the day we rode the Cranbury Brook.&quot;</p><p>Ayala looked up into his face, also remembering everything as well as it were yesterday. &quot;Mr Twentyman rode over it,&quot; she said, &quot;and Colonel Stubbs rode into it.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, yes; Stubbs got a ducking; so he did.&quot; The Captain had not got a ducking, but then he had gone round by the road. &quot;It was a good run that.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I thought so.&quot;</p><p>&quot;We haven&apos;t been lucky since Sir Harry has had the hounds somehow. There doesn&apos;t seem to be the dash about &apos;em there used to be when I was here. I had them before Sir Harry, you know.&quot; All this was nearly in a whisper.</p><p>&quot;Were you Master?&quot; asked Ayala, with a tone of surprise which was not altogether pleasing to the Captain.</p><p>&quot;Indeed I was, but the fag of it was too great, and the thanks too small, so I gave it up. They used to get four days a week out of me.&quot; During the two years that the Captain had had the hounds, there had been, no doubt, two or three weeks in which he had hunted four days.</p><p>Ayala liked hunting, but she did not care much for Captain Glomax, who, having seen her once or twice on horseback, would talk to her about nothing else. A little away on the other side of the table Nina was sitting next to Colonel Stubbs, and she could hear their voices and almost their words. Nina and Jonathan were first cousins, and, of course, could be happy together without giving her any cause for jealousy -- but she almost envied Nina. Yet she had hoped that it might not fall to her lot to be taken out again that evening by the Colonel. Hitherto she had not even spoken to him during the day. They had started to the meet very early, and the gentlemen had almost finished their breakfast before she had come down. If there had been any fault it was her fault, but yet she almost felt that there was something of a disruption between them. It was so evident to her that he was perfectly happy whilst he was talking to Nina.</p><p>After dinner it seemed to be very late before the men came into the drawing-room, and then they were still engaged upon that weary talk about hunting, till Lady Rufford, in order to put a stop to it, offered to sing. &quot;I always do&quot;, she said, &quot;if Rufford ventures to name a fox in the drawing-room after dinner.&quot; She did sing, and Ayala thought that the singing was more weary than the talk about hunting.</p><p>While this was going on, the Colonel had got himself shut up in a corner of the room. Lady Albury had first taken him there, and afterwards he had been hemmed in when Lady Rufford sat down to the piano. Ayala had hardly ventured even to glance at him, but yet she knew all that he did, and heard almost every word that he spoke. The words were not many, but still when he did speak his voice was cheerful. Nina now and again had run up to him, and Lady Rufford had asked him some questions about the music. But why didn&apos;t he come and speak to her? thought Ayala. Though all that nonsense about love was over, still he ought not to have allowed a day to pass at Stalham without speaking to her. He was the oldest friend there in that house except Nina. It was indeed no more than nine months since she had first seen him, but still it seemed to her that he was an old friend. She did feel, as she endeavoured to answer the questions that Lord Rufford was asking her, that Jonathan Stubbs was treating her unkindly.</p><p>Then came the moment in which Lady Albury marshalled her guests out of the room towards their chambers. &quot;Have you found yourself dull without the hunting?&quot; the Colonel said to Ayala.</p><p>&quot;Oh dear no; I must have a dull time if I do, seeing that I have only hunted three days in my life.&quot; There was something in the tone of her voice which, as she herself was aware, almost expressed dissatisfaction. And yet not for worlds would she have shown herself to be dissatisfied with him could she have helped it. &quot;I thought that perhaps you might have regretted the little pony,&quot; he said.</p><p>&quot;Because a thing has been very pleasant, it should not be regretted because it cannot be had always.&quot;</p><p>&quot;To me a thing may become so pleasant, that unless I can have it always my life must be one long regret.&quot;</p><p>&quot;The pony is not quite like that,&quot; said Ayala, smiling as she followed the other ladies out of the room.</p><p>On the next morning the meet was nearer, and some of the ladies were taken there in an open carriage. Lady Rufford went, and Mrs Gosling, and Nina and Ayala. &quot;Of course there is a place for you,&quot; Lady Albury had said to her. &quot;Had I wanted to go I would have made Sir Harry send the drag; but I&apos;ve got to stop at home and see that the buttered toast is ready by the time the gentlemen all come back.&quot; The morning was almost warm, so that the sportsmen were saying evil things of violets and primroses, as is the wont of sportsmen on such occasions, and at the meet the ladies got out of the carriage and walked about among the hounds, making civil speeches to old Tony. &quot;No, my lady,&quot; said Tony, &quot;I don&apos;t like these sunshiny mornings at all; there ain&apos;t no kind of scent, and I goes riding about these big woods, up and down, till my shirt is as wet on my back with the sweat as though I&apos;d been pulled through the river.&quot; Then Lady Rufford walked away and did not ask Tony any more questions.</p><p>Ayala was patting one of the hounds when the Colonel, who had given his horse to a groom, came and joined her. &quot;If you don&apos;t regret that pony,&quot; said he, &quot;somebody else does.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I do regret him in one way, of course. I did like it very much; but I don&apos;t think it nice, when much has been done for me, to say that I want to have more done.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Of course I knew what you meant.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Perhaps you would go and tell Sir Harry and then he would think me very ungrateful.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Ayala,&quot; he said, &quot;I will never say anything of you that will make anybody think evil of you. But, between ourselves, as Sir Harry is not here, I suppose I may confess that I regret the pony.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I should like it, of course,&quot; whispered Ayala.</p><p>&quot;And so should I -- so much! I suppose all these men here would think me an ass if they knew how little I care about the day&apos;s work -- whether we find, or whether we run, or whether we kill -- just because the pony is not here. If the pony were here I should have that feeling of expectation of joy, which is so common to girls when some much-thought-of ball or promised pleasure is just before them.&quot; Then Tony went off with his hounds, and Jonathan, mounting his horse, followed with the ruck.</p><p>Ayala knew very well what the pony meant, as spoken of by the Colonel. When he declared that he regretted the pony, it was because the pony might have carried herself. He had meant her to understand that the much-thought-of ball or promised pleasure would have been the delight of again riding with herself. And then he had again called her Ayala. She could remember well every occasion on which he had addressed her by her Christian name. It had been but seldom. Once, however, it had occurred in the full flow of their early intimacy, before that love-making had been begun. It had struck her as being almost wrong, but still as very pleasant. If it might be made right by some feeling of brotherly friendship, how pleasant would it be! And now she would like it again, if only it might be taken as a sign of friendship rather than of love. It never occurred to her to be angry as she would have been angry with any other man. How she would have looked at Captain Batsby had he dared to call her Ayala! Colonel Stubbs should call her Ayala as long as he pleased -- if it were done only in friendship.</p><p>After that they were driven about for a while, seeing what Tony did with the hounds, as tidings came to them now and again that one fox had broken this way and another had gone the other. But Ayala, through it all, could not interest herself about the foxes. She was thinking only of Jonathan Stubbs. She knew that she was pleased because he had spoken to her, and had said kind, pleasant words to her. She knew that she had been displeased while he had sat apart from her, talking to others. But yet she could not explain to herself why she had been either pleased or displeased. She feared that there was more than friendship -- than mere friendship, in that declaration of his that he did in truth regret the pony. His voice had been, oh, so sweet as he had said it! Something told her that men do not speak in mere friendship after that fashion. Not even in the softness of friendship between a man and a woman will the man&apos;s voice become as musical as that! Young as she was, child as she was, there was an instinct in her breast which declared to her that it was so. But then, if it were so, was not everything again wrong with her? If it were so, then must that condition of things be coming back which it had been, and still was, her firm resolve to avoid. And yet, as the carriage was being driven about, and as the frequent exclamations came that the fox had traversed this way or that, her pride was gratified and she was happy.</p><p>&quot;What was Colonel Stubbs saying to you?&quot; asked Nina, when they were at home at the house after lunch.</p><p>&quot;He was talking about the dear pony which I used to ride.&quot;</p><p>&quot;About nothing else?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No -- about nothing else.&quot; This Ayala said with a short, dry manner of utterance which she would assume when she was determined not to have a subject carried on.</p><p>&quot;Ayala, why do you not tell me everything? I told you everything as soon as it happened.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Nothing has happened.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I know he asked you,&quot; said Nina.</p><p>&quot;And I answered him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Is that to be everything?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes -- that is to be everything,&quot; said Ayala, with a short, dry manner of utterance. It was so plain, that even Nina could not pursue the subject.</p><p>There was nothing done on that day in the way of sport. Glomax</p><p>thought that Tony had been idle, and had made a holiday of the day from the first. But Sir Harry declared that there had not been a yard of scent. The buttered toast, however, was eaten, and the regular sporting conversation was carried on. Ayala, however, was not there to hear it. Ayala was in her own room dreaming.</p><p>She was taken in to dinner by a curate in the neighbourhood -- to whom she endeavoured to make herself very pleasant, while the Colonel sat at her other side. The curate had a good deal to say as to lawn tennis. If the weather remained as it was, it was thought that they could all play lawn tennis on the Tuesday -- when there would be no hunting. The curate was a pleasant young fellow, and Ayala devoted herself to him and to their joint hopes for next Tuesday. Colonel Stubbs never once attempted to interfere with the curate&apos;s opportunity. There was Lady Rufford on the other side of him, and to Lady Rufford he said all that he did say during dinner. At one period of the repast she was more than generally lively, because she felt herself called upon to warn her husband that an attack of the gout was imminent, and would be certainly produced instantaneously if he could not deny himself the delight of a certain dish which was going the round of the table. His lordship smiled and denied himself -- thinking, as he did so, whether another wife, plus the gout, would or would not have been better for him. All this either amused Colonel Stubbs sufficiently, or else made him so thoughtful, that he made no attempt to interfere with the curate. In the evening there was again music -- which resulted in a declaration made upstairs by Sir Harry to his wife that that wife of Rufford&apos;s was a confounded bore. &quot;We all knew that, my dear, as soon as he married her,&quot; said Lady Albury.</p><p>&quot;Why did he marry a bore?&quot;</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
What to do with Captain Batsby had been felt to be a difficulty by Lady Albury]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/what-to-do-with-captain-batsby-had-been-felt-to-be-a-difficulty-by-lady-albury</link>
            <guid>L9DZ8xBGR21aKiwP4Xbj</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:12:11 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[It was his habit to come to Stalham some time in March and there finish the hunting season. It might be hoped that Ayala&apos;s little affair might be arranged early in March, and then, whether he came or whether he did not, it would be the same to Ayala. But the Captain himself would be grievously irate when he should hear the trick which would have been played upon him. Lady Albury had already desired him not to come till after the first week in March, having fabricated an excuse. She had b...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was his habit to come to Stalham some time in March and there finish the hunting season. It might be hoped that Ayala&apos;s little affair might be arranged early in March, and then, whether he came or whether he did not, it would be the same to Ayala. But the Captain himself would be grievously irate when he should hear the trick which would have been played upon him. Lady Albury had already desired him not to come till after the first week in March, having fabricated an excuse. She had been bound to keep the coast clear both for Ayala&apos;s sake and the Colonel&apos;s; but she knew that when her trick should be discovered there would be unmeasured wrath. &quot;Why the deuce don&apos;t you let the two men come and then the best man may win!&quot; said Sir Harry who did not doubt but that, in such a case, the Colonel would prove to be the best man. Here too there was another difficulty. When Lady Albury attempted to explain that Ayala would not come unless she were told that she would not meet the Captain, Sir Harry declared that there should be no such favour. &quot;Who the deuce is this little girl,&quot; he asked, &quot;that everybody should be knocked about in this way for her?&quot; Lady Albury was able to pacify the husband, but she feared that any pacifying of the Captain would be impossible. There would be a family quarrel -- but even that must be endured for the Colonel&apos;s sake.</p><p>In the meantime the Captain was kept in absolute ignorance of Ayala&apos;s movements, and went down to Merle Park hoping to meet her there. He must have been very much in love, for Merle Park was by no means a spot well adapted for hunting. Hounds there were in the neighbourhood, but he turned up his nose at the offer when Sir Thomas suggested that he might bring down a hunter. Captain Batsby, when he went on hunting expeditions, never stirred without five horses, and always confined his operations to six or seven favoured counties. But Ayala just at present was more to him than hunting, and therefore, though it was now the end of February, he went to Merle Park.</p><p>&quot;It was all Sir Thomas&apos;s doing.&quot; It was thus that Lady Tringle endeavoured to console herself when discussing the matter with her daughters. The Honourable Septimus Traffick had now gone up to London, and was inhabiting a single room in the neighbourhood of the House. Augusta was still at Merle Park, much to the disgust of her father. He did not like to tell her to be gone; and would indeed have been glad enough of her presence had it not been embittered by the feeling that he was being &quot;done&quot;. But there she remained, and in discussing the affairs of the Captain with her mother and Gertrude was altogether averse to the suggested marriage for Ayala. To her thinking Ayala was not entitled to a husband at all. Augusta had never given way in the affair of Tom -- had declared her conviction that Stubbs had never been in earnest;, and was of opinion that Captain Batsby would be much better off at Merle Park without Ayala than he would have been in that young lady&apos;s presence. When he arrived nothing was said to him at once about Ayala. Gertrude, who recovered from the great sickness occasioned by Mr Houston&apos;s misconduct, though the recovery was intended only to be temporary, made herself as pleasant as possible. Captain Batsby was made welcome, and remained three days before he sought an opportunity of asking a question about Ayala.</p><p>During this time he found Gertrude to be a very agreeable companion, but he made Mrs Traffick his first confidant. &quot;Well, you know, Captain Batsby, to tell you the truth, we are not very fond of our cousin.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Sir Thomas told me she was to be here.&quot;</p><p>&quot;So we know. My father is perhaps a little mistaken about Ayala.&quot; &quot;Was she not asked?&quot; demanded Captain Batsby, beginning to think that he had been betrayed.</p><p>&quot;Oh, yes; she was asked. She has been asked very often, because she is mamma&apos;s niece, and did live with us once for a short time. But she did not come. In fact she won&apos;t go anywhere, unless -- &quot;</p><p>&quot;Unless what?&quot;</p><p>&quot;You know Colonel Stubbs?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Jonathan Stubbs. Oh dear, yes; very intimately. He is a sort of connection of mine. He is my half-brother&apos;s second cousin by the father&apos;s side.&apos;</p><p>&quot;Oh indeed! Does that make him very near?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Not at all. I don&apos;t like him, if you mean that. He always takes everything upon himself down at Stalham.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What we hear is that Ayala is always running after him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Ayala running after Jonathan?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Haven&apos;t you heard of that?&quot; asked Mrs Traffick. &quot;Why -- she is at Stalham with the Alburys this moment, and I do not doubt that Colonel Stubbs is there also. She would not have gone had she not been sure of meeting him.&quot;</p><p>This disturbed the Captain so violently that for two or three hours he kept himself apart, not knowing what to do with himself or where to betake himself. Could this be true about Jonathan Stubbs? There had been moments of deep jealousy down at Stalham; but then he had recovered from that, having assured himself that he was wrong. It had been Larry Twentyman and not Jonathan Stubbs who had led the two girls over the brook -- into which Stubbs had simply fallen, making himself an object of pity. But now again the Captain believed it all. It was on this account, then, that his half-sister-in-law, Rosaline, had desired him to stay away from Stalham for the present! He knew well how high in favour with Lady Albury was that traitor Stubbs; how it was by her favour that Stubbs, who was no more than a second cousin, was allowed to do just what be pleased in the stables, while Sir Harry himself, the Master of the Hounds, confined himself to the kennel! He was determined at first to leave Merle Park and start instantly for Stalham, and had sent for his servant to begin the packing of his things; but as he thought of it more maturely he considered that his arrival at Stalham would be very painful to himself as well as to others. For the others he did not much care, but he saw clearly that the pain to himself would be very disagreeable. No one at Stalham would be glad to see him. Sir Harry would be disturbed, and the other three persons with whom he was concerned -- Lady Albury, Stubbs, and Ayala -- would be banded together in hostility against him. What chance would he have under such circumstances? Therefore he determined that he would stay at Merle Park yet a little longer.</p><p>And, after all, was Ayala worth the trouble which he had proposed to take for her? How much had he offered her, how scornfully had his offer been received, and how little had she to give him in return! And now he had been told that she was always running after Jonathan Stubbs! Could it be worth his while to run after a girl who was always running after Jonathan Stubbs? Was he not much higher in the world than Jonathan Stubbs, seeing that he had, at any rate, double Stubbs&apos;s income? Stubbs was a red-haired, ugly, impudent fellow, who made his way wherever he went simply by &quot;cheek&apos;! Upon reflection, he found that it would be quite beneath him to run after any girl who could so demean herself as to run after Jonathan Stubbs. Therefore he came down to dinner on that evening with all his smiles, and said not a word about Ayala to Sir Thomas, who had just returned from London.</p><p>&quot;Is he very much provoked?&quot; Sir Thomas asked his wife that evening. &quot;Provoked about what?&quot;</p><p>&quot;He was expressly told that he would meet Ayala here.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He seems to be making himself very comfortable, and hasn&apos;t said a word to me about Ayala. I am sick of Ayala. Poor Tom is going to be really ill.&quot; Then Sir Thomas frowned, and said nothing more on that occasion.</p><p>Tom was certainly in an uncomfortable position, and never left his bed till after noon. Then he would mope about the place, moping even worse than he did before, and would spend the evening all alone in the housekeeper&apos;s room, with a pipe in his mouth, which he seemed hardly able to take the trouble to keep alight. There were three or four other guests in the house, including two honourable Miss Trafficks, and a couple of young men out of the City, whom Lady Tringle hoped might act as antidotes to Houston and Hamel. But with none of them would Tom associate. With Captain Batsby he did form some little intimacy; driven to it, no doubt, by a community of interest. &quot;I believe you were acquainted with my cousin, Miss Dormer, at Stalham?&quot; asked Tom. At that moment the two were sitting over the fire in the housekeeper&apos;s room, and Captain Batsby was smoking a cigar, while Tom was sucking an empty pipe.</p><p>&quot;Oh, yes,&quot; said Captain Batsby, pricking up his ears, &quot;I saw a good deal of her.&quot;</p><p>&quot;A wonderful creature!&quot; ejaculated Tom.</p><p>&quot;Yes, indeed!&quot;</p><p>&quot;For a real romantic style of beauty, I don&apos;t suppose that the world ever saw her like before. Did you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Are you one among your cousin&apos;s admirers?&quot; demanded the Captain. &quot;Am I?&quot; asked Tom, surprised that there should be anybody who had not as yet heard his tragic story. &quot;Am I one of her admirers? Why -- rather! Haven&apos;t you heard about me and Stubbs?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No, indeed.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I thought that everybody had heard that. I challenged him, you know.&quot;</p><p>&quot;To fight a duel?.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Yes; to fight a duel. I sent my friend Faddle down with a letter to Stalham, but it was of no use. Why should a man fight a duel when he has got such a girl as Ayala to love him?&quot;</p><p>&quot;That is quite true, then?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I fear so! I fear so! Oh, yes; it is too true. Then you know;&quot; -- and as he came to this portion of his story he jumped up from his chair and frowned fiercely -- &quot;then, you know, I met him under the portico of the Haymarket, and struck him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh -- was that you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Indeed it was.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And he did not do anything to you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;He behaved like a hero,&quot; said Tom. &quot;I do think that he behaved like a hero -- though of course I hate him.&quot; The bitterness of expression was here very great. &quot;He wouldn&apos;t let them lock me up. Though, in the matter of that, I should have been best pleased if they would have locked me up for ever, and kept me from the sight of the world. Admire that girl, Captain Batsby! I don&apos;t think that I ever heard of a man who loved a girl as I love her. I do not hesitate to say that I continue to walk the world -- in the way of not committing suicide, I mean -- simply because there is still a possibility while she has not as yet stood at the hymeneal altar with another man. I would have shot Stubbs willingly, though I knew I was to be tried for it at the Old Bailey -- and hung! I would have done it willingly -- willingly; or any other man.&quot; After that Captain Batsby thought it might be prudent not to say anything especial as to his own love.</p><p>And how foolish would it be for a man like himself, with a good fortune of his own, to marry any girl who had not a sixpence! The Captain was led into this vain thought by the great civility displayed to him by the ladies of the house. With Lucy, whom he knew to be Ayala&apos;s sister, he had not prospered very well. It came to his ears that she was out of favour with her aunt, and he therefore meddled with her but little. The Tringle ladies, however, were very kind to him -- so kind that he was tempted to think less than ever of one who had been so little courteous to him as Ayala. Mrs Traffick was of course a married woman, and it amounted to nothing. But Gertrude -- ! All the world knew that Septimus Traffick without a shilling of his own had become the happy possessor of a very large sum of money. He, Batsby, had more to recommend him than Traffick! Why should not he also become a happy possessor? He went away for a week&apos;s hunting into Northamptonshire, and then, at Lady Tringle&apos;s request, came back to Merle Park.</p><p>At this time Miss Tringle had quite recovered her health. She had dropped all immediate speech as to Mr Houston. Had she not been provoked, she would have allowed all that to drop into oblivion. But a married sister may take liberties. &quot;You are well rid of him, I think,&quot; said Augusta. Gertrude heaved a deep sigh. She did not wish to acknowledge herself to be rid of him until another string were well fitted to her bow. &quot;After all, a man with nothing to do in the world, with no profession, no occupation, with no money -- &quot;</p><p>&quot;Mr Traffick had not got very much money of his own.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He has a seat in Parliament, which is very much more than fortune, and will undoubtedly be in power when his party comes in. And he is a man of birth. But Frank Houston had nothing to recommend him.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Birth!&quot; said Gertrude, turning up her nose.</p><p>&quot;The Queen, who is the fountain of honour, made his father a nobleman, and that constitutes birth.&quot; This the married sister said with stern severity of manner, and perfect reliance on the constitutional privileges of her Sovereign.</p><p>&quot;I don&apos;t know that we need talk about it,&quot; said Gertrude.</p><p>&quot;Not at all. Mr Houston has behaved very badly, and I suppose there is an end of him as far as this house is concerned. Captain Batsby seems to me to be a very nice young man, and I suppose he has got money. A man should certainly have got money -- or an occupation.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He has got both,&quot; said Gertrude, which, however, was not true, as Captain Batsby had left the service.</p><p>&quot;Have you forgotten my cousin so soon?&quot; Gertrude asked one day, as she was walking with the happy Captain in the park. The Captain, no doubt, had been saying soft things to her.</p><p>&quot;Do you throw that in my teeth as an offence?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Inconstancy in men is generally considered as an offence,&quot; said Gertrude. What it might be in women she did not just then declare. &quot;After all I have heard of your cousin since I have been here, I should hardly have thought that it would be reckoned so in this case.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You have heard nothing against her from me.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I am told that she has treated your brother very badly.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Poor Tom!&quot;</p><p>&quot;And that she is flirting with a man I particularly dislike.&quot; &quot;I suppose she does make herself rather peculiar with that Colonel Stubbs.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And, after all, only think how little I saw of her! She is pretty.&quot; &quot;So some people think. I never saw it myself,&quot; said Gertrude. &quot;We always thought her a mass of affectation. We had to turn her out of the house once, you know. She was living here, and then it was that her sister had to come in her place. It is not their fault that they have got nothing -- poor girls! They are mamma&apos;s nieces, and so papa always has one of them.&quot; After that forgiveness was accorded to the Captain on account of his fickle conduct, and Gertrude consented to accept of his services in the guise of a lover. That this was so Mrs Traffick was well aware. Nor was Lady Tringle very much in the dark. Frank Houston was to be considered as good as gone, and if so it would be well that her daughter should have another string. She was tired of the troubles of the girls around her, and thought that as Captain Batsby was supposed to have an income he would do as a son-in-law. But she had not hitherto been consulted by the young people, who felt among themselves that there still might be a difficulty. The difficulty lay with Sir Thomas. Sir Thomas had brought Captain Batsby there to Merle Park as Ayala&apos;s lover, and as he had been very little at home was unaware of the changes which had taken place. And then Gertrude was still supposed to be engaged to Mr Houston, although this lover had been so violently rejected by himself. The ladies felt that, as he was made of sterner stuff than they, so would it be more difficult to reconcile him to the alterations which were now proposed in the family arrangements. Who was to bell the cat? &quot;Let him go to papa in the usual way, and ask his leave,&quot; said Mrs Traffick.</p><p>&quot;I did suggest that,&quot; said Gertrude, &quot;but he seems not to like to do it quite yet.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Is he such a coward as that?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I do not know that he is more a coward than anybody else. I remember when Septimus was quite afraid to go near papa. But then Benjamin has got money of his own, which does make a difference.&quot; &quot;It&apos;s quite untrue saying that Septimus was ever afraid of papa. Of course he knows his position as a Member of Parliament too well for that. I suppose the truth is, it&apos;s about Ayala.&quot;</p><p>&quot;It is a little odd about Ayala,&quot; said Gertrude, resuming her confidential tone. &quot;It is so hard to make papa understand about these kind of things. I declare I believe he thinks that I never ought to speak to another man because of that scoundrel Frank Houston.&quot;</p><p>All this was in truth so strange to Sir Thomas that he could not understand any of the existing perplexities. Why did Captain Batsby remain as a guest at Merle Park? He had no special dislike to the man, and when Lady Tringle had told him that she had asked the Captain to prolong his visit he had made no objection. But why should the man remain there, knowing as he did now that there was no chance of Ayala&apos;s coming to Merle Park? At last, on a certain Saturday evening, he did make inquiry on the subject. &quot;What on earth is that man staying here for?&quot; he said to his wife.</p><p>&quot;I think he likes the place.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Perhaps he likes the place as well as Septimus Traffick, and means to live here always!&quot; Such allusions as these were constant with Sir Thomas, and were always received by Lady Tringle with dismay and grief. &quot;When does he mean to go away?&quot; asked Sir Thomas, gruffly.</p><p>Lady Tringle had felt that the time had come in which some word should be said as to the Captain&apos;s intentions; but she feared to say it. She dreaded to make the clear explanation to her husband. &quot;Perhaps&quot;, said she, &quot;he is becoming fond of some of the young ladies.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Young ladies! What young ladies? Do you mean Lucy?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh dear no!&quot; said Lady Tringle.</p><p>&quot;Then what the deuce do you mean? He came here after Ayala, because I wanted to have all that nonsense settled about Tom. Ayala is not here, nor likely to be here; and I don&apos;t know why he should stay here philandering away his time. I hate men in a country house who are thorough idlers. You had better take an opportunity of letting him know that he has been here long enough.&quot;</p><p>All this was repeated by Lady Tringle to Mrs Traffick, and by Mrs Traffick to Gertrude. Then they felt that this was no time for Captain Batsby to produce himself to Sir Thomas as a suitor for his youngest daughter.</p><p>CHAPTER 48 THE JOURNEY TO OSTEND</p><p>&quot;No doubt it will be very hard to make papa understand.&quot; This was said by Gertrude to her new lover a few days after that order had been given that the lover should be sent away from Merle Park. The purport of the order in all its severity had not been conveyed to Captain Batsby. The ladies had felt -- Gertrude had felt very strongly -- that were he informed that the master of the house demanded his absence he would take himself off at once. But still something had to be said -- and something done. Captain Batsby was, just at present, in a matrimonial frame of mind. He had come to Merle Park to look for a wife, and, as he had missed one, was, in his present mood, inclined to take another. But there was no knowing how long this might last. Augusta had hinted that &quot;something must be done, either with papa&apos;s consent or without it&quot;. Then there had come the conversation in which Gertrude acknowledged the existing difficulty. &quot;Papa, too, probably, would not consent quite at once.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He must think it very odd that I am staying here,&quot; said the Captain.</p><p>&quot;Of course it is odd. If you could go to him and tell him everything!&quot; But the Captain, looking at the matter all round, thought that he could not go to Sir Thomas and tell him anything. Then she began gently to introduce the respectable clergyman at Ostend. It was not necessary that she should refer at length to the circumstances under which she had studied the subject, but she gave Captain Batsby to understand that it was one as to which she had picked up a good deal of information.</p><p>But the money! &quot;If Sir Thomas were made really angry, the consequences would be disastrous,&quot; said the Captain. But Gertrude was of a different way of thinking. Her father was, no doubt, a man who could be very imperious, and would insist upon having his own way as long as his own way was profitable to him. But he was a man who always forgave.</p><p>&quot;If you mean about the money,&quot; said Gertrude, &quot;I am quite sure that it would all come right.&quot; He did mean about the money, and was evidently uneasy in his mind when the suggested step was made manifest to him. Gertrude was astonished to see how long and melancholy his face could become. &quot;Papa was never unkind about money in his life,&quot; said Gertrude. &quot;He could not endure to have any of us poor.&quot;</p><p>On the next Saturday Sir Thomas again came down, and still found his guest at Merle Park. We are now a little in advance of our special story, which is, or ought to be, devoted to Ayala. But, with the affairs of so many lovers and their loves, it is almost impossible to make the chronicle run at equal periods throughout. It was now more than three weeks since Ayala went to Stalham, and Lady Albury had written to the Captain confessing something of her sin, and begging to be forgiven. This she had done in her anxiety to keep the Captain away. He had not answered his sister-in-law&apos;s letter, but, in his present frame of mind, was not at all anxious to finish up the hunting season at Stalham. Sir Thomas, on his arrival, was very full of Tom&apos;s projected tour. He had arranged everything -- except in regard to Tom&apos;s own assent. He had written to New York, and had received back a reply from his correspondent assuring him that Tom should be made most heartily welcome. It might be that Tom&apos;s fighting propensities had not been made known to the people of New York. Sir Thomas had taken a berth on board of one of the Cunard boats, and had even gone so far as to ask the Captain to come down for a day or two to Merle Park. He was so much employed with Tom that he could hardly afford time and consideration to Captain Batsby and his affairs. Nevertheless he did ask a question, and received an answer with which he seemed to be satisfied. &quot;What on earth is that man staying here for?&quot; he said to his wife.</p><p>&quot;He is going on Friday,&quot; replied Lady Tringle, doubtingly -- almost as though she thought that she would be subjected to further anger because of this delay. But Sir Thomas dropped the subject, and passed on to some matter affecting Tom&apos;s outfit. Lady Tringle was very glad to change the subject, and promised that everything should be supplied befitting the hottest and coldest climates on the earth&apos;s surface.</p><p>&quot;She sails on the nineteenth of April.&quot; said Sir Thomas to his son.</p><p>&quot;I don&apos;t think I could go as soon as that, Sir,&quot; replied Tom, whining.</p><p>&quot;Why not? There are more than three weeks yet, and your mother will have everything ready for you. What on earth is there to hinder you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I don&apos;t think I could go -- not on the nineteenth of April.&quot; &quot;Well then, you must. I have taken your place, and Firkin expects you at New York. They&apos;ll do everything for you there, and you&apos;ll find quite a new life. I should have thought you&apos;d have been delighted to get away from your wretched condition here.&quot;</p><p>&quot;It is wretched,&quot; said Tom; &quot;but I&apos;d rather not go quite so soon.&quot; &quot;Why not?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Well, then -- &quot;</p><p>&quot;What is it, Tom? It makes me unhappy when I see you such a fool.&quot; &quot;I am a fool! I know I am a fool!&quot;</p><p>&quot;Then make a new start of it. Cut and run, and begin the world again. You&apos;re young enough to forget all this.&quot;</p><p>&quot;So I would, only -- &quot;</p><p>&quot;Only what?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I suppose she is engaged to that man Stubbs! If I knew it for certain then I would go. If I went before, I should only come back as soon as I got to New York. If they were once married and it were all done with I think I could make a new start.&quot; In answer to this his father told him that he must go on the nineteenth of April, whether Ayala were engaged or disengaged, married or unmarried -- that his outfit would be bought, his cabin would be ready, circular notes for his use would be prepared, and everything would be arranged to make his prolonged tour as comfortable as possible; but that if he did not start on that day all the Tringle houses would be closed against him, and he would be turned penniless out into the world. &quot;You&apos;ll have to learn that I&apos;m in earnest,&quot; said Sir Thomas, as he turned his back and walked away. Tom took himself off to reflect whether it would not be a grand thing to be turned penniless out into the world -- and all for love!</p><p>By the early train on Monday Sir Thomas returned to London, having taken little or no heed of Captain Batsby during his late visit to the country. Even at Merle Park Captain Batsby&apos;s presence was less important than it would otherwise have been to Lady Tringle and Mrs Traffick, because of the serious nature of Sir Thomas&apos;s decision as to his son. Lady Tringle perhaps suspected something. Mrs Traffick, no doubt, had her own ideas as to her sister&apos;s position; but nothing was said and nothing was done. Both on the Wednesday and on the Thursday Lady Tringle went up to town to give the required orders on Tom&apos;s behalf. On the Thursday her elder daughter accompanied her, and returned with her in the evening. On their arrival they learnt that neither Captain Batsby nor Miss Gertrude had been seen since ten o&apos;clock; that almost immediately after Lady Tringle&apos;s departure in the morning Captain Batsby had caused all his luggage to be sent into Hastings; and that it had since appeared that a considerable number of Miss Gertrude&apos;s things were missing. There could be no doubt that she had caused them to be packed up with the Captain&apos;s luggage. &quot;They have gone to Ostend, mamma,&quot; said Augusta. &quot;I was sure of it, because I&apos;ve heard Gertrude say that people can always get themselves married at Ostend. There is a clergyman there on purpose to do it.&quot;</p><p>It was at this time past seven o&apos;clock, and Lady Tringle when she heard the news was so astounded that she did not at first know how to act. It was not possible for her to reach Dover that night before the night boat for Ostend should have started -- even could she have done any good by going there. Tom was in such a condition that she hardly dared to trust him; but it was settled at last that she should telegraph at once to Sir Thomas, in Lombard Street, and that Tom should travel up to London by the night train.</p><p>On the following morning Lady Tringle received a letter from Gertrude, posted by that young lady at Dover as she passed through on her road to Ostend. It was as follows:</p><p>DEAR MAMMA,</p><p>You will be surprised on your return from London to find that we have gone. After much thinking about it we determined it would be best, because we had quite made up our mind not to be kept separated. Ben was so eager about it that I was obliged to yield. We were afraid that if we asked papa at once he would not have given his consent. Pray give him my most dutiful love, and tell him that I am sure he will never have occasion to be ashamed of his son-in-law. I don&apos;t suppose he knows, but it is the fact that Captain Batsby has about three thousand a year of his own. It is very different from having nothing, like that wretch Frank Houston, or, for that matter, Mr Traffick. Ben was quite in a position to ask papa, but things had happened which made us both feel that papa would not like it just at present. We mean to be married at Ostend, and then will come back as soon as you and papa say that you will receive us. In the meantime I wish you would send some of my clothes after me. Of course I had to come away with very little luggage, because I was obliged to have my things mixed up with Ben&apos;s. I did not dare to have my boxes brought down by the servants. Could you send me the green silk in which I went to church the last two Sundays, and my pink gauze, and the grey poplin? Please send two or three flannel petticoats, as I could not put them among his things, and as many cuffs and collars as you can cram in. I suppose I can get boots at Ostend, but I should like to have the hat with the little brown feather. There is my silk jacket with the fur trimming; I should like to have that. I suppose I shall have to be married without any regular dress, but I am sure papa will make up my trousseau to me afterwards. I lent a little lace fichu to Augusta; tell her I shall so like to have it.</p><p>Give papa my best love, and Augusta, and poor Tom, and accept the same from your affectionate daughter,</p><p>GERTRUDE</p><p>&quot;I suppose I must not add the other name yet.&quot;</p><p>Sir Thomas did not receive the telegram till eleven o&apos;clock, when he returned from dinner, and could do nothing that night. On the next morning he was disturbed soon after five o&apos;clock by Tom, who had come on the same errand. &quot;Idiots!&quot; exclaimed Sir Thomas, &quot;What on earth can they have gone to Ostend for? And what can you do by coming up?&quot;</p><p>&quot;My mother thought that I might follow them to Ostend.&quot;</p><p>&quot;They wouldn&apos;t care for you. No one will care for you until you have got rid of all this folly. I must go. Idiots! Who is to marry them at Ostend? If they are fools enough to want to be married, why shouldn&apos;t they get married in England?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I suppose they thought you wouldn&apos;t consent.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Of course I shan&apos;t consent. But why should I consent a bit more because they have gone to Ostend? I don&apos;t suppose anybody ever had such a set of fools about him as I have.&quot; This would have been hard upon Tom had it not been that he had got beyond the feeling of any hardness from contempt or contumely. As he once said of himself, all sense of other injury had been washed out of him by Ayala&apos;s unkindness.</p><p>On that very day Sir Thomas started for Ostend, and reached the place about two o&apos;clock. Captain Batsby and Gertrude had arrived only during the previous night, and Gertrude, as she had been very sick was still in bed. Captain Batsby was not in bed. Captain Batsby had been engaged since an early hour in the morning looking for that respectable clergyman of the Church of England of whose immediate services he stood in need. By the time that Sir Thomas had reached Ostend he had found that no such clergyman was known in the place. There was a regular English clergyman who would be very happy to marry him -- and to accept the usual fees -- after the due performance of certain preliminaries as ordained by the law, and as usual at Ostend. The lady, no doubt, could be married at Ostend, after such preliminaries -- as she might have been married also in England. All this was communicated by the Captain to Gertrude -- who was still very unwell -- at her bedroom door. Her conduct during this trying time was quite beyond reproach -- and also his -- as Captain Batsby afterwards took an opportunity of assuring her father.</p><p>&quot;What on earth, Sir, is the meaning of all this?&quot; said Sir Thomas, encountering the man who was not his son-in-law in the sitting-room of the hotel.</p><p>&quot;I have just run away with your daughter, Sir Thomas. That is the simple truth.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And I have got the trouble of taking her back again.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I have behaved like a gentleman through it all, Sir Thomas,&quot; said the Captain, thus defending his own character and the lady&apos;s. &quot;You have behaved like a fool. What on earth am I to think of it, Sir? You were asked down to my house because you gave me to understand that you proposed to ask my niece, Miss Dormer, to be your wife; and now you have run away with my daughter. Is that behaviour like a gentleman?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I must explain myself.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Well, Sir?&quot; Captain Batsby found the explanation very difficult; and hummed and hawed a great deal. &quot;Do you mean to say that it was a lie from beginning to end about Miss Dormer?&quot; Great liberties of speech are allowed to gentlemen whose daughters have been run away with, and whose hospitality has been outraged.</p><p>&quot;Oh dear no. What I said then was quite true. It was my intention. But -- but -- .&quot; The perspiration broke out upon the unhappy man&apos;s brow as the great immediate trouble of his situation became clear to him. &quot;There was no lie -- no lie at all. I beg to assure you, Sir Thomas, that I am not a man to tell a lie.&quot;</p><p>&quot;How has it all been, then?&quot;</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[I wish she would; and then I shouldn't care what you did." ]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/i-wish-she-would-and-then-i-shouldn-t-care-what-you-did</link>
            <guid>bwdYYmCUd9f2xKmEAGOt</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 09:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA["I should think you a happy fellow, certainly; and for a time I might avoid you, because your happiness would remind me of my own disappointment; but I should not come behind your back and strike you! Now, tell me where you live, and I will see you home." Then Tom told him where he lived, and in a few minutes the Colonel had left him within his own hall door. CHAPTER 45 THERE IS SOMETHING OF THE ANGEL ABOUT HIM The little accident which was recorded at the close of the last chapter occurred o...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I should think you a happy fellow, certainly; and for a time I might avoid you, because your happiness would remind me of my own disappointment; but I should not come behind your back and strike you! Now, tell me where you live, and I will see you home.&quot; Then Tom told him where he lived, and in a few minutes the Colonel had left him within his own hall door.</p><p>CHAPTER 45 THERE IS SOMETHING OF THE ANGEL ABOUT HIM</p><p>The little accident which was recorded at the close of the last chapter occurred on a Tuesday night. On the following afternoon Tom Tringle, again very much out of spirits, returned to Merle Park. There was now nothing further for him to do in London. He had had his last chance with Ayala, and the last chance had certainly done him no good. Fortune, whether kindly or unkindly, had given him an opportunity of revenging himself upon the Colonel; he had taken advantage of the opportunity, but did not find himself much relieved by what he had done. His rival&apos;s conduct had caused him to be thoroughly ashamed of himself. It had at any rate taken from him all further hope of revenge. So that now there was nothing for him but to take himself back to Merle Park. On the Wednesday he heard nothing further of the matter; but on the Thursday Sir Thomas came down from London, and, showing to poor Tom a paragraph in one of the morning papers, asked whether he knew anything of the circumstance to which reference was made. The paragraph was as follows:</p><p>That very bellicose young City knight who at Christmas time got into trouble by thrashing a policeman within an inch of his life in the streets, and who was then incarcerated on account of his performance, again exhibited his prowess on Tuesday night by attacking Colonel -- an officer than whom none in the army is more popular -- under the portico of the Haymarket theatre. We abstain from mentioning the officer&apos;s name -- which is, however, known to us. The City knight again fell into the hands of the police and was taken to the watch-house. But Colonel -- who knew something of his family, accompanied him, and begged his assailant off. The officer on duty was most unwilling to let the culprit go; but the Colonel used all his influence and was successful. This may be all very well between the generous Colonel and the valiant knight. But if the young man has any friends they had better look to him. A gentleman with such a desire for the glories of battle must be restrained if he cannot control his propensities when wandering about the streets of the metropolis. &quot;Yes,&quot; said Tom -- who scorned to tell a lie in any matter concerning Ayala. &quot;It was me. I struck Colonel Stubbs, and he got me off at the police office.&quot;</p><p>&quot;And you&apos;re proud of what you&apos;ve done?&quot;</p><p>&quot;No, Sir, I&apos;m not. I&apos;m not proud of anything. Whatever I do or whatever I say seems to go against me.&quot;</p><p>&quot;He didn&apos;t go against you as you call it.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I wish he had with all my heart. I didn&apos;t ask him to get me off. I struck him because I hated him; and whatever might have happened I would sooner have borne it than be like this.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You would sooner have been locked up again in prison?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I would sooner anything than be as I am.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I tell you what it is, Tom,&quot; said the father. &quot;If you remain here any longer with this bee in your bonnet you will be locked up in a lunatic asylum, and I shall not be able to get you out again. You must go abroad.&quot; To this Tom made no immediate answer. Lamentable as was his position, he still was unwilling to leave London while Ayala was living there. Were he to consent to go away for any lengthened period, by doing so he would seem to abandon his own claim. Hope he knew there was none; but yet, even yet, he regarded himself as one of Ayala&apos;s suitors. &quot;Do you think it well&quot;, continued the father, &quot;that you should remain in London while such paragraphs as these are being written about you?&quot;</p><p>&quot;I am not in London now,&quot; said Tom.</p><p>&quot;No, you are not in London while you are at Merle Park -- of course. And you will not go up to London without my leave. Do you understand that?&quot; Here Tom again was silent. &quot;If you do,&quot; continued his father, &quot;you shall not be received down here again, nor at Queen&apos;s Gate, nor will the cheques for your allowance be honoured any longer at the bank. In fact if you do not obey me I will throw you off altogether. This absurdity about your love has been carried on long enough.&quot; And so it came to be understood in the family that Tom was to be kept in mild durance at Merle Park till everything should have been arranged for his extended tour about the world. To this Tom himself gave no positive assent, but it was understood that when the time came he would yield to his father&apos;s commands.</p><p>It had thus come to pass that the affray at the door of the Haymarket became known to so much of the world at large as interested itself in the affairs either of Colonel Stubbs or of the Tringles. Other paragraphs were written in which the two heroes of the evening were designated as Colonel J -- S -- and as T -- T -- junior, of the firm of T -- and T -- in the City. All who pleased could read these initials, and thus the world was aware that our Colonel had received a blow, and had resented the affront only by rescuing his assailant from the hands of the police. A word was said at first which seemed to imply that the Colonel had not exhibited all the spirit which might have been expected from him. Having been struck should he not have thrashed the man who struck him -- or at any rate have left the ruffian in the hands of the policemen for proper punishment? But many days had not passed over before the Colonel&apos;s conduct had been viewed in a different light, and men and women were declaring that he had done a manly and a gallant thing. The affair had in this way become sufficiently well known to justify the allusion made to it in the following letter from Lady Albury to Ayala:</p><p>Stalham, Tuesday, 11th February, 187 --</p><p>MY DEAR AYALA,</p><p>It is quite indispensable for the happiness of everybody, particularly that of myself and Sir Harry that you should come down here on the twentieth. Nina will be here on her farewell visit before her return to her mother. Of course you have heard that it is all arranged between her and Lord George Bideford, and this will be the last opportunity which any of us will have of seeing her once again before her martyrdom. The world is to be told that he is to follow her to Rome, where they are to be married -- no doubt by the Pope himself under the dome of St Peter&apos;s. But my belief is that Lord George is going to travel with her all the way. If he is the man I take him to be he will do so, but of course it would be very improper.</p><p>You, however, must of course come and say pretty things to your friend; and, as you cannot go to Rome to see her married, you must throw your old shoe after her when she takes her departure from Stalham. I have written a line to your aunt to press my request for this visit. This she will no doubt show to you, and you, if you please, can show her mine in return.</p><p>And now, my dear, I must explain to you one or two other arrangements. A certain gentleman will certainly not be here. It was not my fault that a certain gentleman went to Kingsbury Crescent. The certain gentleman is, as you are aware, a great friend of ours, and was entitled to explain himself if it so seemed good to him; but the certain gentleman was not favoured in that enterprise by the Stalham interest. At any rate, the certain gentleman will not be at Stalham on this occasion. So much for the certain gentleman. Colonel Stubbs will be here, and, as he will be coming down on the twentieth, would be glad to travel by the same train, so that he may look after your ticket and your luggage, and be your slave for the occasion. He will leave the Paddington Station by the 4 P.M. train if that will suit you.</p><p>We all think that he behaved beautifully in that little affair at the Haymarket theatre. I should not mention it only that everybody has heard of it. Almost any other man would have struck the poor fellow again; but he is one of the very few who always know what to do at the moment without taking time to think of it.</p><p>Mind you come like a good girl.</p><p>Your affectionate friend,</p><p>ROSALINE ALBURY</p><p>It was in this way that Ayala heard what had taken place between her cousin Tom and Colonel Stubbs. Some hint of a fracas between the two men had reached her ears; but now she asked various questions of her aunt, and at last elicited the truth. Tom had attacked her other lover in the street -- had attacked Colonel Stubbs because of his injured love, and had grossly misbehaved himself. As a consequence he would have been locked up by the police had not the Colonel himself interfered on his behalf. This to Ayala seemed to be conduct worthy almost of an Angel of Light.</p><p>Then the question of the proposed visit was discussed -- first with her aunt, and then with herself. Mrs Dosett was quite willing that her niece should go to Stalham. To Mrs Dosett&apos;s thinking, a further journey to Stalham would mean an engagement with Colonel Stubbs. When she had read Lady Albury&apos;s letter she was quite sure that that had been Lady Albury&apos;s meaning. Captain Batsby was not to receive the Stalham interest -- but that interest was to be used on the part of Colonel Stubbs. She had not the slightest objection. It was clear to her that Ayala would have to be married before long. It was out of the question that one man after another should fall in love with her violently, and that nothing should come of it. Mrs Dosett had become quite despondent about Tom. There was an amount of dislike which it would be impossible to overcome. And as for Captain Batsby there could be no chance for a man whom the young lady could not be induced even to see. But the other lover, whom the lady would not admit that she loved -- as to whom she had declared that she could never love him -- was held in very high favour. &quot;I do think it was so noble not to hit Tom again,&quot; she had said. Therefore, as Colonel Stubbs had a sufficient income, there could be no reason why Ayala should not go again to Stalham. So it was that Mrs Dosett argued with herself, and such was the judgment which she expressed to Ayala. But there were difficulties. Ayala&apos;s little stock of cash was all gone. She could not go to Stalham without money, and that money must come out of her Uncle Reginald&apos;s pocket. She could not go to Stalham without some expenditure, which, as she well knew, it would be hard for him to bear. And then there was that terrible question of her clothes! When that suggestion had been made of a further transfer of the nieces a cheque had come from Sir Thomas. &quot;If Ayala comes to us she will want a few things,&quot; Sir Thomas had said in a note to Mrs Dosett. But Mr Dosett had chosen that the cheque should be sent back when it was decided that the further transfer should not take place. The cheque had been sent back, and there had been an end of it. There must be a morning dress, and there must be another hat, and there must be boots. So much Mrs Dosett acknowledged. Let them do what they might with the old things, Mrs Dosett acknowledged that so much as that would at least be necessary. &quot;We will both go to work,&quot; Mrs Dosett said, &quot;and we will ask your uncle what he can do for us.&quot; I think she felt that she had received some recompense when Ayala kissed her.</p><p>It was after this that Ayala discussed the matter with herself. She had longed to go once again to Stalham -- &quot;dear Stalham&quot;, as she called it to herself. And as she thought of the place she told herself that she loved it because Lady Albury had been so kind to her, and because of Nina, and because of the hunting, and because of the general pleasantness and luxury of the big comfortable house. And yes; there was something to be said, too, of the pleasantness of Colonel Stubbs. Till he had made love to her he had been, perhaps, of all these fine new friends the pleasantest. How joyous his voice had sounded to her! How fraught with gratification to her had been his bright ugly face! How well he had known how to talk to her, and to make her talk, so that everything had been easy with her! How thoroughly she remembered all his drollery on that first night at the party in London -- and all his keen sayings at the theatre -- and the way he had insisted that she should hunt! She thought of little confidences she had had with him, almost as though he had been her brother! And then he had destroyed it all by becoming her lover!</p><p>Was he to be her lover still; and if so would it be right that she should go again to Stalham, knowing that she would meet him there? Would it be right that she should consent to travel with him -- under his special escort? Were she to do so would she not be forced to do more -- if he should again ask her? It was so probable that he would not ask her again! It was so strange that such a one should have asked her!</p><p>But if he did ask her? Certainly he was not like that Angel of Light whom she had never seen, but of whom the picture in her imagination was as clearly drawn as though she were in his presence daily. No -- there was a wave of hair and a shape of brow, and a peculiarity of the eye, with a nose and mouth cut as sharp as chisel could cut them out of marble, all of which graced the Angel but none of which belonged to the Colonel. Nor were these the chief of the graces which made the Angel so glorious to her. There was a depth of poetry about him, deep and clear, pellucid as a lake among grassy banks, which made all things of the world mean when compared to it. The Angel of Light lived on the essence of all that was beautiful, altogether unalloyed by the grossness of the earth. That such a one should come in her way! Oh, no; she did not look for it! But, having formed such an image of an angel for herself, would it be possible that she should have anything less divine, less beautiful, less angelic?</p><p>Yes; there was something of the Angel about him; even about him, Colonel Jonathan Stubbs. But he was so clearly an Angel of the earth, whereas the other one, though living upon the earth, would be of the air, and of the sky, of the clouds, and of the heaven, celestial. Such a one she knew she had never seen. She partly dreamed that she was dreaming. But if so had not her dream spoilt her for all else? Oh, yes; indeed he was good, this red-haired ugly Stubbs. How well had he behaved to Tom! How kind he had been to herself! How thoughtful of her he was! If it were not a question of downright love -- of giving herself up to him, body and soul, as it were -- how pleasant would it be to dwell with him! For herself she would confess that she loved earthly things -- such as jumping over the brook with Larry Twentyman before her to show her the way. But for her love, it was necessary that there should be an Angel of Light. Had she not read that angels had come from heaven and taken in marriage the daughters of men?</p><p>But was it right that she should go to Stalham, seeing that there were two such strong reasons against it? She could not go without costing her uncle money, which he could ill afford; and if she did go would she -- would she not confess that she had abandoned her objection to the Colonel&apos;s suit? She, too, understood something of that which had made itself so plain to her aunt. &quot;Your uncle thinks it is right that you should go,&quot; her aunt said to her in the drawing-room that evening; &quot;and we will set to work tomorrow and do the best that we can to make you smart.&quot;</p><p>Her uncle was sitting in the room at the time and Ayala felt herself compelled to go to him and kiss him, and thank him for all his kindness. &quot;I am so sorry to cost you so much money, Uncle Reginald,&quot; she said.</p><p>&quot;It will not be very much, my dear,&quot; he answered. &quot;It is hard that young people should not have some amusement. I only hope they will make you happy at Stalham.&quot;</p><p>&quot;They always make people happy at Stalham,&quot; said Ayala, energetically. &quot;And now, Ayala,&quot; said her aunt, &quot;you can write your letter to Lady Albury before we go out tomorrow. Give her my compliments, and tell her that as you are writing I need not trouble her.&quot; Ayala, when she was alone in her bedroom, felt almost horrified as she reflected that in this manner the question had been settled for her. It had been impossible for her to reject her uncle&apos;s liberal offer when it had been made. She could not find the courage at that moment to say that she had thought better of it all, and would decline the visit. Before she was well aware of what she was doing she had assented, and had thus, as it were. thrown over all the creations of her dream. And yet, as she declared herself, not even Lady Albury could make her marry this man, merely because she was at her house. She thought that, if she could only avoid that first journey with Colonel Stubbs in the railway, still she might hold her own. But, were she to travel with him of her own accord, would it not be felt that she would be wilfully throwing herself in his way? Then she made a little plan for herself, which she attempted to carry out when writing her letter to Lady Albury on the following morning. What was the nature of her plan, and how she effected it, will be seen in the letter which she wrote:</p><p>Kingsbury Crescent, Thursday</p><p>DEAR LADY ALBURY,</p><p>It is so very good of you to ask me again, and I shall be so happy to visit Stalham once more! I should have been very sorry not to see dear Nina before her return to Italy. I have written to congratulate her of course, and have told her what a happy girl I think she is. Though I have not seen Lord George I take all that from her description. As she is going to be his wife immediately, I don&apos;t at all see why he should not go back with her to Rome. As for being married by the Pope, I don&apos;t think he ever does anything so useful as that. I believe he sits all day and has his toe kissed. That is what they told me at Rome. I am very glad of what you tell me about the certain gentleman, because I don&apos;t think I could have been happy at Stalham if he had been there. It surprised me so much that I could not think that he meant it in earnest. We never hardly spoke to each other when we were in the house together.</p><p>Perhaps, if you don&apos;t mind, and I shan&apos;t be in the way, [here she began to display the little plan which she had made for her own protection] I will come down by an earlier train than you mention. There is one at 2.15, and then I need not be in the dark all the way. You need not say anything about this to Colonel Stubbs, because I do not at all mind travelling by myself.</p><p>Yours affectionately,</p><p>AYALA</p><p>This was her little plan. But she was very innocent when she thought that Lady Albury would be blind to such a scheme as that. She got three words from Lady Albury, saying that the 2.15 train would do very well, and that the carriage would be at the station to meet her. Lady Albury did not also say in her note that she had communicated with Colonel Stubbs on the subject, and informed him that he must come up from Aldershot earlier than he intended in order that he might adapt himself to Ayala&apos;s whims. &quot;Foolish little child!&quot; said Lady Albury to herself. &quot;As if that would make any difference!&quot; It was clear to Lady Albury that Ayala must surrender now that she was coming to Stalham a second time, knowing that the Colonel would be there.</p><p>CHAPTER 46 AYALA GOES AGAIN TO STALHAM</p><p>The correspondence between Lady Albury and Colonel Stubbs was close and frequent, the friendship between them being very close. Ayala had sometimes asked herself why Lady Albury should have been so kind and affectionate to her, and had failed to find any sufficient answer. She had been asked to Stalham at first -- so far as she knew -- because she had been intimate at Rome with the Marchesa Baldoni. Hence had apparently risen Lady Albury&apos;s great friendship, which had seemed even to herself to be strange. But in truth the Marchesa had had very little to do with it -- nor had Lady Albury become attached to Ayala for Ayala&apos;s own sake. To Lady Albury Colonel Stubbs was -- as she declared to herself very often -- &quot;her own real brother&quot;. She had married a man very rich, well known in the world, whom she loved very well; and she was not a woman who in such a position would allow herself to love another man. That there might certainly be no danger of this kind she was continually impressing on her friend the expediency of marriage -- if only he could find someone good enough to marry. Then the Colonel had found Ayala. Lady Albury at the beginning of all this was not inclined to think that Ayala was good enough. Judging at first from what she heard and then from what she saw, she had not been very favourable to Ayala. But when her friend had insisted -- had declared that his happiness depended on it -- had shown by various signs that he certainly would carry out his intentions, if not at Stalham then elsewhere, Lady Albury had yielded herself to him, and had become Ayala&apos;s great friend. If it was written in the book that Ayala was to become Mrs Stubbs then it would certainly be necessary that she and Ayala should be friends. And she herself had such confidence in Jonathan Stubbs as a man of power, that she did not doubt of his success in any matter to which he might choose to devote himself. The wonder had been that Ayala should have rejected the chance when it had come in her way. The girl had been foolish, allowing herself to be influenced by the man&apos;s red hair and ill-sounding name -- not knowing a real pearl when she saw it. So Lady Albury had thought -- having only been partially right in so thinking -- not having gone to the depth of Ayala&apos;s power of dreaming. She was very confident, however, that the girl, when once again at Stalham, would yield herself easily; and therefore she went to work, doing all that she could to smoothen love&apos;s road for her friend Jonathan. Her woman&apos;s mind had seen all those difficulties about clothes, and would have sent what was needful herself had she not feared to offend both the Dosetts and Ayala. Therefore she prepared a present which she could give to the girl at Stalham without offence. If it was to be the girl&apos;s high fate to become Mrs Jonathan Stubbs, it would be proper that she should be adorned and decked, and made beautiful among others of her class -- as would become the wife of such a hero.</p><p>Of all that passed between her and Ayala word was sent down to Aldershot. &quot;The stupid little wretch will throw you out, I know,&quot; wrote Lady Albury, &quot;by making you start two hours before you have done your work. But you must let your work do itself for this occasion. There is nothing like a little journey together to make people understand each other.&quot;</p><p>The Colonel was clearly determined to have the little journey together. Whatever might be the present military duties at Aldershot, the duties of love were for the nonce in the Colonel&apos;s mind more imperative. Though his Royal Highness had been coming that afternoon to inspect all the troops, still he would have resolved so to have arranged matters as to travel down with Ayala to Stalham. But not only was he determined to do this, but he found it necessary also to arrange a previous meeting with Lady Albury before that important twentieth of the month. This he did by making his friend</p><p>believe that her presence in London for a few hours would be necessary for various reasons. She came up as he desired, and there he met her at her hotel in Jermyn Street. On his arrival here he felt that he was almost making a fool of himself by the extent of his anxiety. In his nervousness about this little girl he was almost as insane as poor Tom Tringle, who, when she despised his love, was altogether unable to control himself. &quot;If I cannot persuade her at last, I shall be knocking somebody over the head, as he did.&quot; It was thus he was talking to himself as he got out of the cab at the door of the hotel.</p><p>&quot;And now, Jonathan,&quot; said Lady Albury, &quot;what can there possibly be to justify you in giving me all this trouble?</p><p>&quot;You know you had to come up about that cook&apos;s character.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I know that I have given that as a reason to Sir Harry; but I know also that I should have gone without a cook for a twelve month had you not summoned me.&quot;</p><p>&quot;The truth is I could not get down to Stalham and back without losing an additional day, which I cannot possibly spare. With you it does not very much matter how many days you spare.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Nor how much money I spend, nor how much labour I take, so that I obey all the commands of Colonel Jonathan Stubbs! What on earth is there that I can say or do for you more?&quot;</p><p>&quot;There are one or two things&quot;, said he, &quot;that I want you to understand. In the first place, I am quite in earnest about this.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Don&apos;t I know that you&apos;re in earnest?&quot;</p><p>&quot;But perhaps you do not understand the full extent of my earnestness. If she were to refuse me ultimately I should go away.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Go away! Go where?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh; that I have not at all thought of -- probably to India, as I might manage to get a regiment there. But in truth it would matter very little.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You are talking like a goose.&quot;</p><p>&quot;That is very likely, because in this matter I think and feel like a goose. It is not a great thing in a man to be turned out of his course by some undefined feeling which he has as to a young woman. But the thing has occurred before now, and will occur again, in my case, if I am thrown over.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What on earth is there about the girl?&quot; asked Lady Albury. &quot;There is that precious brother-in-law of ours going to hang himself incontinently because she will not look at him. And that unfortunate friend of yours, Tom Tringle, is, if possible, worse than Ben Batsby or yourself.&quot;</p><p>&quot;If two other gentlemen are in the same condition it only makes it the less singular that I should be the third. At any rate, I am the third.&quot;</p><p>&quot;You do not mean to liken yourself to them?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Indeed I do. As to our connection with Miss Dormer, I can see no difference. We are all in love with her, and she has refused us all. It matters little whether a man&apos;s ugliness or his rings or his natural stupidity may have brought about this result. &quot;You are very modest, Jonathan.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I always was, only you never could see it. I am modest in this matter; but not for that reason the less persistent in doing the best I can for myself. My object now in seeing you is to let you understand that it is -- well, not life and death, because she will not suffice either to kill me or to keep me alive -- but one of those matters which, in a man&apos;s career, are almost as important to him as life and death. She was very decided in her refusal.&quot;</p><p>&quot;So is every girl when a first offer is made to her. How is any girl so to arrange her thoughts at a moment&apos;s notice as to accept a man off-hand?&quot;</p><p>&quot;Girls do do so.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Very rarely, I think; and when they do they are hardly worth having,&quot; said Lady Albury, laying down the law on the matter with great precision. &quot;If a girl accept a man all at once when she has had, as it were, no preparation for such a proposal, she must always surely be in a state of great readiness for matrimonial projects. When there has been a prolonged period of spooning then of course it is quite a different thing. The whole thing has in fact been arranged before the important word has been spoken.&quot;</p><p>&quot;What a professor in the art you are!&quot; said he.</p><p>&quot;The odd thing is, that such a one as you should be so ignorant. Can&apos;t you understand that she would not come to Stalham if her mind were made up against you? I said nothing of you as a lover, but I took care to let her know that you were coming. You are very ready to put yourself in the same boat with poor Ben Batsby or that other unfortunate wretch. Would she, do you think, have consented to come had she known that Ben would have been there, or your friend Tom Tringle?&quot;</p><p>There was much more of it, but the upshot was -- as the Colonel had intended that it should be -- that Lady Albury was made to understand that Ayala&apos;s goodwill was essential to his happiness. &quot;Of course I will do my best,&quot; she said, as he parted from her. &quot;Though I am not quite as much in love with her myself as you are, yet I will do my best.&quot; Then when she was left alone, and was prosecuting her inquiries about the new cook, and travelling back in the afternoon to Stalham, she again considered how wonderful a thing it was such a girl as Ayala, so small, apparently so unimportant, so childish in her manner, with so little to say for herself, should become a person of such terrible importance. The twentieth came, and at ten minutes before two Ayala was at the Paddington Railway Station. The train, which was to start at 2.15, had been chosen by herself so that she might avoid the Colonel, and there she was, with her aunt, waiting for it. Mrs Dosett had thought it to be her duty to see her off, and had come with her in the cab. There were the two boxes laden with her wardrobe, such as it was. Both she and her aunt had worked hard; for though -- as she had declared to herself -- there was no special reason for it, still she had wished to look her best. As she saw the boxes put into the van, and had told herself how much shabbier they were than the boxes of other young ladies who went visiting to such houses as Stalham, she rejoiced that Colonel Stubbs was not there to see them. And she considered whether it was possible that Colonel Stubbs should recognise a dress which she had worn at Stalham before, which was now to appear in a quite altered shape. She wondered also whether it would be possible that Colonel Stubbs should know how poor she was. As she was thinking of all this there was Colonel Stubbs on the platform.</p><p>She had never doubted but that her little plan would be efficacious. Nor had her aunt doubted -- who had seen through the plan, though not a word had been spoken between them on the subject. Mrs Dosett had considered it to be impossible that a Colonel engaged on duties of importance at Aldershot should run away from them to wait upon a child like Ayala -- even though he had professed himself to be in love with the child. She had never seen the Colonel, and on this occasion did not expect to see him. But there he was, all suddenly, shaking hands with Ayala.</p><p>&quot;My aunt, Mrs Dosett,&quot; whispered Ayala. Then the Colonel began to talk to the elder lady as though the younger lady were a person of very much less importance. Yes, he had run up from Aldershot a little earlier than he had intended. There had been nothing particular to keep him down at Aldershot. It had always been his intention to go to Stalham on this day, and he was glad of the accident which was bringing Miss Dormer there just at the same time. He spent a good deal of his time at Stalham because Sir Harry and he, who were in truth cousins, were as intimate as brothers. He always lived at Stalham when he could get away from duty and was not in London. Stalham was a very nice place certainly; one of the most comfortable houses he knew in England. So he went on till he almost made Mrs Dosett believe, and did make Ayala believe, that his visit to Stalham had nothing to do with herself. And yet Mrs Dosett knew that the offer had been made. Ayala bethought herself that she did not care so much for the re-manufactured frock after all, nor yet for the shabby appearance of the boxes. The real Angel of Light would not care for her frock nor for her boxes; and certainly would not be indifferent after the fashion of -- of -- ! Then she began to reflect that she was making a fool of herself.</p><p>She was put into the carriage, Mr Dosett having luckily decided against the use of the second class. Going to such a house as Stalham Ayala ought, said Mr Dosett, to go as any other lady would. Had it been himself or his wife it would have been very different; but for Ayala, on such an occasion as this, he would be extravagant. Ayala was therefore put into her seat while the Colonel stood at the door outside, still talking to Mrs Dosett. &quot;I don&apos;t think she will be let to come away at the end of a week,&quot; said the Colonel. &quot;Sir Harry doesn&apos;t like people to come away very soon.&quot; Ayala heard this, and thought that she remembered that Sir Harry himself was very indifferent as to the coming and going of the visitors. &quot;They go up to London about the end of March,&quot; said the Colonel, &quot;and if Miss Dormer were to return about a week before it would do very well.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Oh, no,&quot; said Ayala, putting her head out of the window; &quot;I couldn&apos;t think of staying so long as that.&quot; Then the last final bustle was made by the guard; the Colonel got in, the door was shut, and Mrs Dosett, standing on the platform, nodded her head for the last time.</p><p>There were only four persons in the carriage. In the opposite corner there were two old persons probably a husband and wife, who had been very careful as to a foot-warming apparatus, and were muffled up very closely in woollen and furs. &quot;If you don&apos;t mind shutting the door, Sir,&quot; said the old gentleman, rather testily, &quot;because my wife has a pain in her face.&quot; The door absolutely was shut when the words were spoken, but the Colonel made some sign of closing all the apertures. But there was a ventilator above, which the old lady spied. &quot;It you don&apos;t mind shutting that hole up there, Sir, because my husband is very bad with neuralgia.&quot; The Colonel at once got up and found that the ventilator was fast closed, so as not to admit a breath of air. &quot;There are draughts come in everywhere,&quot; said the old gentleman. &quot;The Company ought to be prosecuted.&quot; &quot;I believe the more people they kill the better they like it,&quot; said the old lady. Then the Colonel looked at Ayala with a very grave face, with no hint at a smile, with a face which must have gratified even the old lady and gentleman. But Ayala understood the face, and could not refrain from a little laugh. She laughed only with her eyes -- but the Colonel saw it.</p><p>&quot;The weather has been very severe all day,&quot; said the Colonel, in a severe voice.</p><p>Ayala protested that she had not found it cold at all. &quot;Then, Miss, I think you must be made of granite,&quot; said the old lady. &quot;I hope you&apos;ll remember that other people are not so fortunate.&quot; Ayala again smiled, and the Colonel made another effort as though to prevent any possible breath of air from making its way into the interior of the vehicle.</p><p>There was silence among them for some minutes, and then Ayala was quite surprised by the tone in which her friend addressed her. &quot;What an ill-natured girl you must be&quot;, said he, &quot;to have put me to such a terrible amount of trouble all on purpose.&quot; &quot;I didn&apos;t,&quot; said Ayala.</p><p>&quot;Yes, you did. Why wouldn&apos;t you come down by the four o&apos;clock train as I told you? Now I&apos;ve left everything undone, and I shouldn&apos;t wonder if I get into such a row at the Horse Guards that I shall never hear the end of it. And now you are not a bit grateful.&quot; &quot;Yes, I am grateful; but I didn&apos;t want you to come at all,&quot; she said.</p><p>&quot;Of course I should come. I didn&apos;t think you were so perverse.&quot; &quot;I&apos;m not perverse, Colonel Stubbs.&quot;</p><p>&quot;When young persons are perverse, it is my opinion they oughtn&apos;t to be encouraged,&quot; said the old lady from her corner.</p><p>&quot;My dear, you know nothing about it,&quot; said the old gentleman. &quot;Yes, I do,&quot; said the old lady. &quot;I know all about it. Whatever she does a young lady ought not to be perverse. I do hate perversity. I am sure that hole up there must be open, Sir, for the wind does come in so powerful.&quot; Colonel Stubbs again jumped up and poked at the ventilator.</p><p>In the meantime Ayala was laughing so violently that she could with difficulty prevent herself from making a noise, which; she feared, would bring down increased wrath upon her from the old lady. That feigned scolding from the Colonel at once brought back upon her the feeling of sudden and pleasant intimacy which she had felt when he had first come and ordered her to dance with him at the ball in London. It was once again with her as though she knew this man almost more intimately, and certainly more pleasantly, than any of her other acquaintances. Whatever he said she could answer him now, and pretend to scold him, and have her joke with him as though no offer had ever been made. She could have told him now all the story of that turned dress, if that subject had come naturally to her, or have laughed with him at her own old boxes, and confided to him any other of the troubles of her poverty, as if they were jokes which she could share at any rate with him. Then he spoke again. &quot;I do abominate a perverse young woman,&quot; he said. Upon this Ayala could no longer constrain herself, but burst into loud laughter.</p><p>After a while the two old people became quite familiar, and there arose a contest, in which the lady took part with the Colonel, and the old man protected Ayala. The Colonel spoke as though he were quite in earnest, and went on to declare that the young ladies of the present time were allowed far too much licence. &quot;They never have their own bread to earn,&quot; he said, &quot;and they ought to make themselves agreeable to other people who have more to do.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I quite agree with you, Sir,&quot; said the old lady. &quot;They should run about and be handy. I like to see a girl that can jump about the house and make herself useful.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Young ladies ought to be young ladies,&quot; said the old man, putting his mouth for a moment up out of his comforter.</p><p>&quot;And can&apos;t a young lady be useful and yet be a young lady?&quot; said the Colonel.</p><p>&quot;It is her special province to be ornamental,&quot; said the old gentleman. &quot;I like to see young ladies ornamental. I don&apos;t think young ladies ought to be scolded, even if they are a little fractious.&quot;</p><p>&quot;I quite agree with you, Sir,&quot; said Ayala. And so the fight went on with sundry breaks and changes in the matter under discussion till the station for Stalham had been reached. The old gentleman, indeed, seemed to lose his voice before the journey was half over, but the lady persevered, so that she and the Colonel became such fast friends that she insisted on shaking hands with him when he left the carriage.</p><p>&quot;How could you be so wicked as to go on hoaxing her like that?&quot; said Ayala, as soon as they were on the platform.</p><p>&quot;There was no hoax at all. I was quite in earnest. Was not every word true that I said? Now come and get into the carriage quickly, or you will be as bad as the old gentleman himself.&quot;</p><p>Ayala did get into the carriage quickly, where she found Nina. The two girls were full of conversation as they went to Stalham; but through it all Ayala could not refrain from thinking how the Jonathan Stubbs of today had been exactly like that Jonathan Stubbs she had first known -- and how very unlike a lover.</p><p>CHAPTER 47 CAPTAIN BATSBY AT MERLE PARK</p><p>When Ayala went to Stalham Captain Batsby went to Merle Park. They had both been invited by Lady Tringle, and when the letter was written to Ayala she was assured that Tom should not be there. At that time Tom&apos;s last encounter with the police had not as yet become known to the Tringles, and the necessity of keeping Tom at the house in the country was not manifest. The idea had been that Captain Batsby should have an opportunity of explaining himself to Ayala. The Captain came; but, as to Ayala, Mrs Dosett sent word to say that she had been invited to stay some days just at that time with her friend Lady Albury at Stalham.</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[
Scott has recorded the birth of a child weighing 2 1/2 pounds, and another 3 1/4 pounds. In the Chicago ]]></title>
            <link>https://paragraph.com/@wwwwwwwww/scott-has-recorded-the-birth-of-a-child-weighing-2-1-2-pounds-and-another-3-1-4-pounds-in-the-chicago</link>
            <guid>ci1u191EWOaqqrPdILpk</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 05:14:21 GMT</pubDate>
            <description><![CDATA[Bartholinus mentions a girl of eleven who weighed over 200 pounds. There is an instance recorded of a young girl in Russia who weighed nearly 200 pounds when but twelve. Wulf, quoted by Ebstein, describes a child which died at birth weighing 295 ounces. It was well proportioned and looked like a child three months old, except that it had an enormous development of fatty tissue. The parents were not excessively large, and the mother stated that she had had children before of the same proportio...]]></description>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bartholinus mentions a girl of eleven who weighed over 200 pounds. There is an instance recorded of a young girl in Russia who weighed nearly 200 pounds when but twelve. Wulf, quoted by Ebstein, describes a child which died at birth weighing 295 ounces. It was well proportioned and looked like a child three months old, except that it had an enormous development of fatty tissue. The parents were not excessively large, and the mother stated that she had had children before of the same proportions. Grisolles mentions a child who was so fat at twelve months that there was constant danger of suffocation; but, marvelous to relate, it lost all its obesity when two and a half, and later was remarkable for its slender figure. Figure 169 shows a girl born in Carbon County, Pa., who weighed 201 pounds when nine years old. McNaughton describes Susanna Tripp, who at six years of age weighed 203 pounds and was 3 feet 6 inches tall and measured 4 feet 2 inches around the waist. Her younger sister, Deborah, weighed 119 pounds; neither of the two weighed over 7 pounds at birth and both began to grow at the fourth month. On October, 1788, there died at an inn in the city of York the surprising &quot;Worcestershire Girl&quot; at the age of five. She had an exceedingly beautiful face and was quite active. She was 4 feet in height and larger around the breast and waist; her thigh measured 18 inches and she weighed nearly 200 pounds. In February, 1814, Mr. S. Pauton was married to the only daughter of Thomas Allanty of Yorkshire; although she was but thirteen she was 13 stone weight (182 pounds). At seven years she had weighed 7 stone (98 pounds). Williams mentions several instances of fat children. The first was a German girl who at birth weighed 13 pounds; at six months, 42 pounds; at four years, 150 pounds; and at twenty years, 450 pounds. Isaac Butterfield, born near Leeds in 1781, weighed 100 pounds in 1782 and was 3 feet 13 inches tall. There was a child named Everitt, exhibited in London in 1780, who at eleven months was 3 feet 9 inches tall and measured around the loins over 3 feet. William Abernethy at the age of thirteen weighed 22 stone (308 pounds) and measured 57 inches around the waist. He was 5 feet 6 inches tall. There was a girl of ten who was 1.45 meters (4 feet 9 inches) high and weighed 175 pounds. Her manners were infantile and her intellectual development was much retarded. She spoke with difficulty in a deep voice; she had a most voracious appetite.</p><p>At a meeting of the Physical Society of Vienna on December 4, 1894, there was shown a girl of five and a half who weighed 250 pounds. She was just shedding her first teeth; owing to the excess of fat on her short limbs she toddled like an infant. There was no tendency to obesity in her family. Up to the eleventh month she was nursed by her mother, and subsequently fed on cabbage, milk, and vegetable soup. This child, who was of Russian descent, was said never to perspire.</p><p>Cameron describes a child who at birth weighed 14 pounds, at twelve months she weighed 69 pounds, and at seventeen months 98 pounds. She was not weaned until two years old and she then commenced to walk. The parents were not remarkably large. There is an instance of a boy of thirteen and a half who weighed 214 pounds. Kaestner speaks of a child of four who weighed 82 pounds, and Benzenberg noted a child of the same age who weighed 137. Hildman, quoted by Picat, speaks of an infant three years and ten months old who had a girth of 30 inches. Hillairet knew of a child of five which weighed 125 pounds. Botta cites several instances of preternaturally stout children. One child died at the age of three weighing 90 pounds, another at the age of five weighed 100 pounds, and a third at the age of two weighed 75 pounds.</p><p>Figure 170 represents Miss &quot;Millie Josephine&quot; of Chicago, a recent exhibitionist, who at the reputed age of thirteen was 5 feet 6 inches tall and weighed 422 pounds.</p><p>General Remarks.--It has been chiefly in Great Britain and in Holland that the most remarkable instances of obesity have been seen, especially in the former country colossal weights have been recorded. In some countries corpulency has been considered an adornment of the female sex. Hesse-Wartegg refers to the Jewesses of Tunis, who when scarcely ten years old are subjected to systematic treatment by confinement in narrow, dark rooms, where they are fed on farinaceous foods and the flesh of young puppies until they are almost a shapeless mass of fat. According to Ebstein, the Moorish women reach with astonishing rapidity the desired embonpoint on a diet of dates and a peculiar kind of meal.</p><p>In some nations and families obesity is hereditary, and generations come and go without a change in the ordinary conformation of the representatives. In other people slenderness is equally persistent, and efforts to overcome this peculiarity of nature are without avail.</p><p>Treatment of Obesity.--Many persons, the most famous of whom was Banting, have advanced theories to reduce corpulency and to improve slenderness; but they have been uniformly unreliable, and the whole subject of stature-development presents an almost unexplored field for investigation. Recently, Leichtenstein, observing in a case of myxedema treated with the thyroid gland that the subcutaneous fat disappeared with the continuance of the treatment, was led to adopt this treatment for obesity itself and reports striking results. The diet of the patient remained the same, and as the appetite was not diminished by the treatment the loss of weight was evidently due to other causes than altered alimentation. He holds that the observations in myxedema, in obesity, and psoriasis warrant the belief that the thyroid gland eliminates a material having a regulating influence upon the constitution of the panniculus adiposus and upon the nutrition of the skin in general. There were 25 patients in all; in 22 the effect was entirely satisfactory, the loss of weight amounting to as much as 9.5 kilos (21 pounds). Of the three cases in which the result was not satisfactory, one had nephritis with severe Graves&apos; disease, and the third psoriasis. Charrin has used the injections of thyroid extract with decided benefit. So soon as the administration of the remedy was stopped the loss of weight ceased, but with the renewal of the remedy the loss of weight again ensued to a certain point, beyond which the extract seemed powerless to act. Ewald also reports good results from this treatment of obesity.</p><p>Remarkable Instances of Obesity.--From time immemorial fat men and women have been the object of curiosity and the number who have exhibited themselves is incalculable. Nearly every circus and dime museum has its example, and some of the most famous have in this way been able to accumulate fortunes.</p><p>Athenaeus has written quite a long discourse on persons of note who in the olden times were distinguished for their obesity. He quotes a description of Denys, the tyrant of Heraclea, who was so enormous that he was in constant danger of suffocation; most of the time he was in a stupor or asleep, a peculiarity of very fat people. His doctors had needles put in the back of his chairs to keep him from falling asleep when sitting up and thus incurring the danger of suffocation. In the same work Athenaeus speaks of several sovereigns noted for their obesity; among others he says that Ptolemy VII, son of Alexander, was so fat that, according to Posidonius, when he walked he had to be supported on both sides. Nevertheless, when he was excited at a repast, he would mount the highest couch and execute with agility his accustomed dance.</p><p>According to old chronicles the cavaliers at Rome who grew fat were condemned to lose their horses and were placed in retirement. During the Middle Ages, according to Guillaume in his &quot;Vie de Suger,&quot; obesity was considered a grace of God.</p><p>Among the prominent people in the olden time noted for their embonpoint were Agesilas, the orator Licinius Calvus, who several times opposed Cicero, the actor Lucius, and others. Among men of more modern times we can mention William the Conqueror; Charles le Gros; Louis le Gros; Humbert II, Count of Maurienne; Henry I, King of Navarre; Henry III, Count of Champagne; Conan III, Duke of Brittany; Sancho I, King of Leon; Alphonse II, King of Portugal; the Italian poet Bruni, who died in 1635; Vivonne, a general under Louis XIV; the celebrated German botanist Dillenius; Haller; Frederick I, King of Wurtemberg, and Louis XVIII.</p><p>Probably the most famous of all the fat men was Daniel Lambert, born March 13, 1770, in the parish of Saint Margaret, Leicester. He did not differ from other youths until fourteen. He started to learn the trade of a die-sinker and engraver in Birmingham. At about nineteen he began to believe he would be very heavy and developed great strength. He could lift 500 pounds with ease and could kick seven feet high while standing on one leg. In 1793 he weighed 448 pounds; at this time he became sensitive as to his appearance. In June, 1809, he weighed 52 stone 11 pounds (739 pounds), and measured over 3 yards around the body and over 1 yard around the leg. He had many visitors, and it is said that once, when the dwarf Borwilaski came to see him, he asked the little man how much cloth he needed for a suit. When told about 3/4 of a yard, he replied that one of his sleeves would be ample. Another famous fat man was Edward Bright, sometimes called &quot;the fat man of Essex.&quot; He weighed 616 pounds. In the same journal that records Bright&apos;s weight is an account of a man exhibited in Holland who weighed 503 pounds.</p><p>Wadd, a physician, himself an enormous man, wrote a treatise on obesity and used his own portrait for a frontispiece. He speaks of Doctor Beddoes, who was so uncomfortably fat that a lady of Clifton called him a &quot;walking feather bed.&quot; He mentions Doctor Stafford, who was so enormous that this epitaph was ascribed to him:--</p><p>&quot;Take heed, O good traveler! and do not tread hard, For here lies Dr. Stafford, in all this churchyard.&quot;</p>]]></content:encoded>
            <author>wwwwwwwww@newsletter.paragraph.com (wwwwwwwww)</author>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>