I came across this poster -- related to this development application -- over the weekend:
And I think it raises a number of important questions:
-
Is 2 storeys appropriate for next to a subway station and next to an existing mid-rise building?
-
Is a mid-rise building truly unprecedented in this context? See below.
-
Are mid-rise homes inappropriate for "residential streets?"
-
How does building height factor into flood plain concerns? Wouldn't lot coverage be more relevant?
-
And when does a mid-rise become a "high-rise?"
For more context, here's the proposal and its immediate surroundings:
https://twitter.com/HousingNowTO/status/1557173774016995328?s=20&t=-I9yrZU8WNE__TVthtMPWg
I fully appreciate that there's little incentive to support new development in a place where you already live -- even if you happen to live in a similarly-scaled building across the street. And I am sure that I'll receive a number of emails following this post.
But optimizing the use of land around our existing transit stations is one of the best things we can do as city builders.
Update: I have redacted the contact information on the above poster.