After years traversing the global crypto landscape, I've watched an industry collectively masturbate to vanity metrics while missing the fundamental point of technological revolution.
Let's talk real talk: Our ecosystem is built on a house of cards constructed from Discord members, Twitter followers, and token emissions that mean absolutely nothing.
Take Arbitrum's STIP grant program—a perfect microcosm of our systemic dysfunction. 150 million dollars distributed to artificially pump Total Value Locked (TVL), creating a feeding frenzy of capital movement that looks like growth but smells like desperation. (Source: Arbitrum Short-Term Incentive Program). Did these users actually utilize the chain? Or did they just chase the next yield opportunity like digital nomads with attention deficit?
We're essentially recreating Curve and Convex over and over—complex yield farming mechanisms that incentivize capital movement through increasingly byzantine token economic models. Users aren't building; they're extracting. They're not investing; they're arbitraging.
The blockchain "revolution" has become a circular financial circle jerk where:
Rewards are disconnected from actual utility
User acquisition happens through token emissions
"Growth" is just capital musical chairs
Our 562 million "users" aren't users. They're yield hunters, airdrop farmers, and metric manipulators. (Source: BeInCrypto). We've created an ecosystem that rewards performative engagement over genuine innovation.
The killer app isn't coming from another conference panel or another token distribution strategy. It'll emerge from solving real problems so elegantly that blockchain becomes invisible—a utility, not a speculation vehicle.
We need less talk about "next billion users" and more focus on creating something worth using.
This isn't a critique. It's a call to rebuild.
Franklin Mongiove
I've been talking intermittently about crypto being most useful when it's an implementation detail. I think most folks that came for the revolution and have been around and building for a few cycles feel that way. I have no hate for speculation, but it's definitely not why I'm here. Memecoins are a fun way to play with network effects. Full stop. It's just not something that's super interesting to me... maybe because I'm terrible at networking and speculation 😅 I just ran across this article and it definitely resonates along these lines. I want the invisible blockchain revolution. I'll check in with y'all on the speculation, but it's not my jam. https://paragraph.xyz/@thecostcokid.eth/the-blockchain-illusion-metrics,-mirages,-and-meaningless-growth
I think tipping coins largely fall into this camp as well. Don't get me wrong: DEGEN was revolutionary when it dropped. A token meant to encourage the kind of content we want our social graph to be populated... what a wonderful idea! But market realities mean that farming rings are incentivized and given enough incentive (when number go up), they become impossible to police because they can just keep scaling. I think this model is definitely worth continuing to pursue though, so I hope folks continue to innovate. I really do want to have the ability to "like" someone's post in a way that has financial outcomes.
We're grateful for all the writers out there that are courageous enough to share their stories, insights, and ideas with the world. We appreciate you! To that end, we're back with the 23rd edition of Paragraph Picks, highlighting a few hand-picked pieces of writing we enjoyed over the past week or so.
@danielmcglynn explores the cyclical “bubble dynamics” of Bitcoin, emphasizing how its boom-and-bust patterns, driven by halving events and market psychology, contribute to adoption and innovation but also present significant risks for investors caught in the hype. "It’s also helpful to think that each market cycle is a series of bubbles or a chain of bubbles, that all connect at regular intervals to drive market adoption, development, and innovation." https://paragraph.xyz/@open-money/bubble-market-dynamics
@usv's Grace Carney highlights the challenges faced by internet knowledge creators in competing with AI-generated content, proposing a third path where creators retain ownership of their work while using AI tools to enhance engagement and preserve the value of human expertise. "The future looks like creators combining their expertise with AI in ways that preserve humans’ most valuable assets: their relationships and their ideas." https://paragraph.xyz/@in-transit.com/a-third-path
@asha profiles photographer @ozlem, exploring her journey of documenting disappearing cultures, her commitment to preserving human stories through respectful and empathetic photography, and her passion for exploring diverse traditions that connect us through shared human experiences. "Despite our diversity in beliefs, cultures, and faiths, we share this world, and the only thing we need to do is practice empathy and respect." https://paragraph.xyz/@beams/framing-humanity-ozlems-journey-through-disappearing-cultures