A new way to use iOS Shortcuts
In the future, Music Plus will support a summary of music history. This feature requires users to add music to the library via Music Plus. But I don’t know how to avoid switching between Apple Music and Music Plus. Today I found Shortcuts automation On App Open is truly useful. Creating a when open Apple Music then open Music Plus is the solution. Music Plus now got the ability to cover Apple Music. Music Plus: https://musicplus.pro
A new way to use iOS Shortcuts
In the future, Music Plus will support a summary of music history. This feature requires users to add music to the library via Music Plus. But I don’t know how to avoid switching between Apple Music and Music Plus. Today I found Shortcuts automation On App Open is truly useful. Creating a when open Apple Music then open Music Plus is the solution. Music Plus now got the ability to cover Apple Music. Music Plus: https://musicplus.pro
Snap Ring Interaction
新年第二天，补充描述一下 Snap 的交互。 Snap 的输入操作基于右下角的添加按钮。点击按钮会弹出完整的输入界面，长按按钮会触发 Ring 操作，以此实现减少输入步骤。Ring 操作通过多个 Ring 用户可以快速产生一条记录。使用前需预先配置好每个 Ring 上的参数，最后分析用户手指滑行的轨迹确定结果。有两种模式：第一种模式每个 Ring 参数固定，比如前两级为分类，最后一层为数字长按后会默认展示所有层级的 Ring，直接滑动产生最终输入第二种模式除最外层 Ring 参数固定，后面层级参数与上一级关联默认只展示第一层的 Ring当手指滑动到 Ring 上分类，此时展开下级 Ring循环上述操作到达最终层级时产生最终输入总结第一种方案，操作较快，误触较少，但结构较为简单，难以应对复杂需求。第二种方案结构复杂，需要更多配置细节，且容易误触，好在更加精确，最终结果也更加精细。 另外，对于用户来说，长按是一个成本较高的操作，对于部分用户可以考虑点击默认开始 Ring 操作，长按改为完整输入界面。
Snap Ring Interaction
新年第二天，补充描述一下 Snap 的交互。 Snap 的输入操作基于右下角的添加按钮。点击按钮会弹出完整的输入界面，长按按钮会触发 Ring 操作，以此实现减少输入步骤。Ring 操作通过多个 Ring 用户可以快速产生一条记录。使用前需预先配置好每个 Ring 上的参数，最后分析用户手指滑行的轨迹确定结果。有两种模式：第一种模式每个 Ring 参数固定，比如前两级为分类，最后一层为数字长按后会默认展示所有层级的 Ring，直接滑动产生最终输入第二种模式除最外层 Ring 参数固定，后面层级参数与上一级关联默认只展示第一层的 Ring当手指滑动到 Ring 上分类，此时展开下级 Ring循环上述操作到达最终层级时产生最终输入总结第一种方案，操作较快，误触较少，但结构较为简单，难以应对复杂需求。第二种方案结构复杂，需要更多配置细节，且容易误触，好在更加精确，最终结果也更加精细。 另外，对于用户来说，长按是一个成本较高的操作，对于部分用户可以考虑点击默认开始 Ring 操作，长按改为完整输入界面。
import this
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters Beautiful is better than ugly. Explicit is better than implicit. Simple is better than complex. Complex is better than complicated. Flat is better than nested. Sparse is better than dense. Readability counts. Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. Although practicality beats purity. Errors should never pass silently. Unless explicitly silenced. In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. There should be one-- and preferably ...
import this
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters Beautiful is better than ugly. Explicit is better than implicit. Simple is better than complex. Complex is better than complicated. Flat is better than nested. Sparse is better than dense. Readability counts. Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. Although practicality beats purity. Errors should never pass silently. Unless explicitly silenced. In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. There should be one-- and preferably ...
