Resolutely Not Buying Bitcoin:What Happens?
For example,when we work and create value for society,we are participating in the distribution.Those who create more value get a larger slice of the pie,while those who create less,who just lie at home,deserve to be cut—don't you?If you don't consume,the amount of money in your hand remains the same,so it won't be cut,right?No,money is just a way to calculate the proportion of social resources. If there's a total of 10,000 yuan and you hold 1 yuan,you possess a 1/10,000 social resource voucher.But if the state can't get your money and simply opens a new venue to grab money,then the total becomes 100,000 or 1 million.It doesn't need to take your money;your money naturally becomes worthless—why?Because under the premise of unchanged social resources,you can only exchange for 1/100,000 or 1/1 million of the resources. So I say the absolute value of money doesn't mean anything;it's the proportion it holds of the total that determines how much you can exchange for.In the agricultural civilization era,one person with a hoe,facing the yellow soil and the sky,obtained social resources by creating social wealth;but after entering the industrial civilization era,some people did the work of 1,000 people.They took 1,000 shares by using more efficient tools.Is it unfair?No,it's just that you don't have the right tools to grab it,so you have to be robbed. This is the"creation logic,"which is easy to understand,and many people agree—look,although he took 1,000 shares of resources,he made contributions to society 1,000 times that of an ordinary person,which is reasonable.However,the logic of Bitcoin is not easy to understand because it is financial logic,prediction logic,consensus logic,risk logic,shareholder logic.Given that we have had a long period of detours here,there is a natural misunderstanding and aversion to this kind of"making money by judgment"in user education,so many people can't understand it and think it's unfair.In fact,it's easy to understand. If there is something that everyone wants,regardless of what it is,even if it's just a painting for showing off,and everyone wants to hang it in their home,then the"awareness"that"this thing might be wanted by more people"and eventually more people come to grab it,should this"awareness"make money?Of course,because I also bear the risk of"if no one wants it,it will be stuck in my hands."So it's simple,if more people want Bitcoin in the future,then everyone will put their hard-earned real money into this pool to participate in this wealth redistribution game.And as everyone keeps pouring wealth into it,it inevitably draws blood from other pools. Can you understand this?For example,if there are only two pools in the world,the stock market and the cryptocurrency market,then as everyone keeps pouring their wealth and resource shares into the cryptocurrency market,the funds in the stock market are drawn out,and doesn't the price of every stock plummet?Those who chose the wrong pool,haven't their wealth been taken away?If you don't play and only hold cash,you are essentially playing passively because in a constantly expanding pool,not grabbing is a loss,and not grabbing fast enough is still a loss.So is it a"mutual cutting among the group"game?Of course not,as new wealth keeps coming in,how can it be called"mutual cutting among the group"? Bitcoin is a ruler;your coin count as a proportion of the total can distribute how much fiat currency enters the field,and it is the basis for your distribution of fiat currency in the field.You say it doesn't create new value?Then I have to start from how much the"world's first and largest peer-to-peer trustless decentralized value transfer system"is worth,think about how much the internet is worth,and if you were now an"original shareholder of the internet"or an"original shareholder of SWIFT,"how many times would your stock have multiplied over these decades?Maybe you would already be the richest person in the world.You can choose not to buy Bitcoin,and you can choose not to buy anything else,but you must remember that cash is also an asset.Essentially,you use cash to participate in the distribution of the society's wealth proportion,which is the same as using any other asset to participate in the distribution. What's the difference? Some assets will gather more and more consensus,so other people's wealth will flow to your side;while some assets will lose consensus,and your wealth will flow to other people's side.This game,whether you like it or not,as long as you are a social person,is mandatory to participate in,and no one can
Resolutely Not Buying Bitcoin:What Happens?
For example,when we work and create value for society,we are participating in the distribution.Those who create more value get a larger slice of the pie,while those who create less,who just lie at home,deserve to be cut—don't you?If you don't consume,the amount of money in your hand remains the same,so it won't be cut,right?No,money is just a way to calculate the proportion of social resources. If there's a total of 10,000 yuan and you hold 1 yuan,you possess a 1/10,000 social resource voucher.But if the state can't get your money and simply opens a new venue to grab money,then the total becomes 100,000 or 1 million.It doesn't need to take your money;your money naturally becomes worthless—why?Because under the premise of unchanged social resources,you can only exchange for 1/100,000 or 1/1 million of the resources. So I say the absolute value of money doesn't mean anything;it's the proportion it holds of the total that determines how much you can exchange for.In the agricultural civilization era,one person with a hoe,facing the yellow soil and the sky,obtained social resources by creating social wealth;but after entering the industrial civilization era,some people did the work of 1,000 people.They took 1,000 shares by using more efficient tools.Is it unfair?No,it's just that you don't have the right tools to grab it,so you have to be robbed. This is the"creation logic,"which is easy to understand,and many people agree—look,although he took 1,000 shares of resources,he made contributions to society 1,000 times that of an ordinary person,which is reasonable.However,the logic of Bitcoin is not easy to understand because it is financial logic,prediction logic,consensus logic,risk logic,shareholder logic.Given that we have had a long period of detours here,there is a natural misunderstanding and aversion to this kind of"making money by judgment"in user education,so many people can't understand it and think it's unfair.In fact,it's easy to understand. If there is something that everyone wants,regardless of what it is,even if it's just a painting for showing off,and everyone wants to hang it in their home,then the"awareness"that"this thing might be wanted by more people"and eventually more people come to grab it,should this"awareness"make money?Of course,because I also bear the risk of"if no one wants it,it will be stuck in my hands."So it's simple,if more people want Bitcoin in the future,then everyone will put their hard-earned real money into this pool to participate in this wealth redistribution game.And as everyone keeps pouring wealth into it,it inevitably draws blood from other pools. Can you understand this?For example,if there are only two pools in the world,the stock market and the cryptocurrency market,then as everyone keeps pouring their wealth and resource shares into the cryptocurrency market,the funds in the stock market are drawn out,and doesn't the price of every stock plummet?Those who chose the wrong pool,haven't their wealth been taken away?If you don't play and only hold cash,you are essentially playing passively because in a constantly expanding pool,not grabbing is a loss,and not grabbing fast enough is still a loss.So is it a"mutual cutting among the group"game?Of course not,as new wealth keeps coming in,how can it be called"mutual cutting among the group"? Bitcoin is a ruler;your coin count as a proportion of the total can distribute how much fiat currency enters the field,and it is the basis for your distribution of fiat currency in the field.You say it doesn't create new value?Then I have to start from how much the"world's first and largest peer-to-peer trustless decentralized value transfer system"is worth,think about how much the internet is worth,and if you were now an"original shareholder of the internet"or an"original shareholder of SWIFT,"how many times would your stock have multiplied over these decades?Maybe you would already be the richest person in the world.You can choose not to buy Bitcoin,and you can choose not to buy anything else,but you must remember that cash is also an asset.Essentially,you use cash to participate in the distribution of the society's wealth proportion,which is the same as using any other asset to participate in the distribution. What's the difference? Some assets will gather more and more consensus,so other people's wealth will flow to your side;while some assets will lose consensus,and your wealth will flow to other people's side.This game,whether you like it or not,as long as you are a social person,is mandatory to participate in,and no one can
