Brandon Donnelly — Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly. — Page 727

https://twitter.com/WaterfrontTO/status/1290698023962648582?s=20

One of my favorite public spaces in the city is easily Sugar Beach at the foot of Jarvis Street. So I couldn't resist sharing this before and after tweet by Waterfront Toronto . Sugar Beach turns 10 years old next week. It's nearly a teenager.

For those of you who were around and paying attention a decade ago, there was a bit of controversy over the cost of this park -- specifically its pink umbrellas. The budget for the park was $14 million and each umbrella cost $11,000.

It's one of those things that's easy to single out and make a big deal out of -- if that's what you're trying to do. "How much? $11,000 for a candy pink beach umbrella? Come on."

But as Waterfront Toronto explained in this blog post from 2014 , each umbrella was fabricated out of a solid piece of fiberglass and was designed to withstand hurricane winds, as well as a good old fashioned Toronto winter. They also serve as lighting for the beach at night.

Part of this is coming from lessons they learned on previous waterfront parks, where the umbrellas weren't as expensive and haven't been as resilient to the elements. So there is a whole life cycle cost analysis to be considered here.

Now I don't profess to be an expert on candy pink beach umbrellas, but I will say this: Sugar Beach wouldn't be Sugar beach without them. And ten years later, it's easy to argue for this being one of the most successful public spaces in the city.

P.S. If I could make one small request for Toronto's waterfront, it's that we need to better engage the lake. We need proper places to swim. Think of the Strandbad Tiefenbrunnen or the Seebad Enge in Zurich. We may need to tidy things up a little, but it'll be worth it.

Alasdair Rae is back with another set of interesting maps. This time he maps out precipitation levels across the United Kingdom and the United States using cool 3D extruded mappings. He calls them rain shadow maps . Above is showing the average annual precipitation in the contiguous US from 1981 to 2010. The higher the peaks the higher the precipitation. Not surprisingly, the highest values are in the Pacific Northwest with over 4,064 mm (160 inches) of precipitation per annum. Some of the patterns here are also really interesting. Note California's Central Valley.

https://twitter.com/donnelly_b/status/1289943840644792323?s=20

There is evidence to suggest, according to this recent Bloomberg Green article as well as many other sources, that we may be hitting "peak meat." That is, the global production of animal proteins appears to be declining. It declined last year in 2019 and that was only the second time since 1961 in which that happened. And this year, the same is projected to happen, which is supposedly unprecedented in modern times.

The big change is that people are eating a lot less beef. In fact, per capita beef production peaked way back in the 1970s and has been slowing declining ever since. The growth over the years has really been coming from chicken. In 1961, 39% of all meat production was beef. As of 2018, that number had declined to 20%. Pork as a percentage of all production has remained more or less consistent. But chicken has basically tripled from 11% to 34%.

From an environmental and climate change standpoint, this is a very good thing. As most of you know, greenhouse gas emissions from the production of beef are vastly higher (about 10x) than for pork and chicken. Chicken is the lowest (see above). At the same time, big bets are being made that this growing love of chicken isn't enough. In the first 7 months of 2020, over $1.4 billion of venture capital was raised for "faux meat" startups ( source ). This is already a significant increase compared to 2019.

This money is expecting the future of meat to be plant-based and cell-based.

All charts from Bloomberg Green .