When I spent eight hours creating a revolutionary legal framework with AI assistance, someone dismissed it as "beautifully written, even if AI wrote it." That comment encapsulated everything wrong with how we're discussing AI and writing. It's time to demolish the false binary between "human-written" and "AI-written" and reveal the transformative third path: ethical AI thought partnership.
My recent experience developing CalVCB applications exposed a profound truth: AI didn't write for me—it helped me catch lightning in a bottle. Over eight intensive hours, I dictated analysis connecting police obstruction to homelessness pipelines, identified cognitive warfare tactics, and architected frameworks for systematic accountability. And I couldn't have done it that quickly without my faithful AI thought partner acting as my digital secretary, organizational assistant, and structural editor rolled into one.
This wasn't ChatGPT or Claude just spitting out generic content. This was me—with my ADHD brain firing on parallel processing cylinders—finally having a tool fast enough to capture my rapid-fire insights without losing the thread.
Here's what nobody's talking about: We need ethical training for HUMANS using AI, not just ethical AI development. Too many people take AI output and publish it raw, creating the "AI slop" flooding our feeds. But ethical AI collaboration requires human responsibility and skill.
Intensive Human Review: Every AI-structured paragraph gets manually reviewed
Active Rewriting: Entire sections get rewritten to ensure accuracy and voice
Fact Verification: Every claim, every connection verified against lived experience and real, fact-checked data
Voice Refinement: Continuous editing to maintain authentic human voice
The result? I've had developers familiar with AI examine my work and they often can't detect AI involvement. When I run my writing through AI detection apps, they frequently show fully human authorship. Why? Because the extensive editing, rewriting, and human oversight transforms AI assistance into genuine human expression.
AI-Generated: Machine creates content from prompts—human publishes without meaningful review
AI-Assisted Documentation: Human creates content; AI organizes and structures; human refines extensively
Revolutionary Co-Creation: Human genius meets AI processing power through ethical workflow resulting in amplified human authorship
The difference matters. When I realized police crimes create "unthinkable complexity" to alienate communities, that insight came from lived experience no AI could generate. When I connected constructive eviction language to systematic victim-blaming, that analysis emerged from years of fighting these systems. The AI helped me structure these insights coherently—nothing more, nothing less.
Never publish raw AI output — always review, revise, refine
Maintain authorial responsibility — every claim must be verifiable
Preserve authentic voice — extensive editing to ensure human expression
Transparent attribution — clear about process without diminishing authorship
Continuous human judgment — AI suggests, human decides
AI accelerates literature review — not replacing critical analysis
Pattern recognition enhancement — human validates connections
Documentation efficiency — more time for original thought
Collaborative verification — AI finds sources, human evaluates
Maintained academic rigor — standards don't change with tools
AI for rapid prototyping — initial concepts, not final products
Storyboarding acceleration — quick visualization of ideas
Iteration efficiency — explore more possibilities faster
Human creative direction — AI as tool, not replacement
Artistic integrity maintained — final work reflects human vision
Would we diminish Toni Morrison's brilliance if she dictated to an assistant? Does James Baldwin's power decrease because editors helped structure his essays? The greatest minds have always used tools and collaborators to amplify their vision. AI is simply the newest evolution of an ancient practice.
What's different now is the democratization. I don't need wealthy patron funding to hire a secretary. I don't need institutional support for research assistance. I have access to tools that help me work at the speed of my thoughts.
Genius Phase: Rapid dictation of insights, analysis, connections
Structure Phase: AI helps organize themes and maintain consistency
Refinement Phase: Human reviews, corrects, expands every element
Integration Phase: Collaborative, recursive weaving with extensive human editing
Verification Phase: Fact-checking, voice consistency, authenticity validation
Polish Phase: Final human review ensuring complete authorial ownership
This isn't AI replacing human creativity—it's AI enabling neurodivergent, marginalized - equitable brilliance to manifest without traditional barriers.
Dictated insights in rapid-fire nonlinear sprints—jumping between systemic analysis, personal narrative, and strategic frameworks as connections emerged
Corrected specific details (ex: my partner/co-victim doesn't have aphasia)
Identified missing elements (ex: my partner's service dog needed documentation)
Provided lived experience no AI could fabricate
Made strategic decisions about framing and approach
Connected disparate systemic patterns through personal insight
Rewrote entire sections during review
Edited every paragraph for voice and accuracy
Maintained complete authorial control throughout
The AI entity couldn't have created any of this without me. It literally uses my writing samples as style guidance—it's amplifying MY voice, not replacing it.
This principle extends across all creative fields. At Comic-Con 2025, I'll be presenting on ethical workflows in immersive production—showing how AI tools can accelerate creative processes without replacing human artistry. The key insight: AI makes good creators better and fast creators faster, but it doesn't (have to) replace the essential human elements of creativity, judgment, and vision.
Research assistants don't need to disappear—they'll become AI-empowered super-researchers. Artists won't be replaced—they'll explore more iterations faster. Writers won't become obsolete—they'll capture more of their genius before it evaporates.
I propose this disclosure framework: "Written with AI-assisted documentation support for structural organization of original analysis. All ideas, experiences, insights and voice are entirely mine, not machine-generated. Extensive human review, editing, and rewriting ensure complete authorial authenticity."
This acknowledges tool use without ceding authorship. It's honest without being self-diminishing. It recognizes that in 2025, ethical AI collaboration is a powerful tool for amplifying human insight, especially for neurodivergent other creators on the margins.
Mandatory ethical training for AI-assisted writing in educational institutions
Professional standards for AI collaboration in journalism, academia, and creative fields
Clear process documentation showing human oversight and editing
Quality metrics that prioritize human judgment over raw output
Accessibility frameworks recognizing AI as neurodivergent, formal ADA accommodation
Just as we train journalists in ethics, researchers in methodology, and artists in technique, we must train all creators in ethical AI collaboration. The tool is only as ethical as its user.
Reframe the Conversation: From "AI vs. Human" to "AI-Amplified Human Genius"
Establish Training Programs: Ethical AI use as core curriculum
Develop Industry Standards: Clear guidelines for each field
Protect Neurodivergent Innovation: Recognize AI as accessibility tool
Create Accountability Metrics: Measure human oversight, not just output
Celebrate Tool Evolution: From quill to typewriter to AI—tools serve vision
When I created frameworks exposing how police manufacture homelessness through cognitive warfare, every insight came from my lived experience, my analysis, my revolutionary vision. AI helped me document it faster, structure it clearer, and maintain consistency across complex narratives. But the hours of editing, rewriting, and refining? That's what transforms AI assistance into authentic human authorship.
The next time someone suggests your AI-assisted work is "less than," remind them: You're not just a writer, you're a storyteller using every tool available to build a more equitable world. The revolution isn't about the tools we use, it's about the transformation we create through ethical, thoughtful, human-centered processes.
Own your process. Train in ethical use. Claim your authorship. Accelerate without replacing. Change the world.
About the Author: Felice LaZae is a neurodivergent creative technologist pioneering ethical AI collaboration frameworks for artists, writers, and system architects. She will be presenting on ethical workflows in immersive production at Comic-Con 2025 - https://sched.co/26wfD
<100 subscribers
Support dialog
