Share Dialog
In a landmark policy evolution, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has begun to draw clearer lines around the digital asset space, signaling that many types of cryptocurrencies and related activities do not fall under its jurisdiction as securities. This new direction, championed by the agency’s recently formed Crypto Task Force under the Trump administration, aims to replace years of regulatory ambiguity with proactive guidance, though not without sparking significant internal debate.
Moving away from its previous “regulation by enforcement” stance, the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, has provided much-needed clarity on several key areas:
Stablecoins: The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has affirmed that certain USD-backed stablecoins are not securities. This aligns with new legislation like the GENIUS Act, which places stablecoins under a banking and payments framework.
Meme Coins: In a notable declaration, the SEC stated it would no longer classify meme coins as securities. Commissioner Peirce later emphasized this by cautioning investors to “be an adult,” acknowledging the speculative nature of these assets while indicating the SEC would not step in to regulate them as it would traditional securities.
Crypto Mining: The commission has also clarified that the act of crypto mining itself does not constitute a securities transaction, separating the creation of assets from their sale or investment.
This series of announcements reflects a significant change in regulatory philosophy. The goal is to create a clear and predictable environment that fosters innovation while protecting investors. Commissioner Peirce has been a vocal advocate for this approach, arguing that the security status of a crypto asset often depends less on the token itself and more on the “economic reality” of how it is sold and used.
The Crypto Task Force is working to develop a comprehensive taxonomy for digital assets, which would help distinguish between assets that are securities and those that are digital commodities, potentially ceding oversight of the latter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
However, this new direction has faced sharp criticism from within the SEC. Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw has publicly warned that these staff statements, while intended to provide clarity, may be “muddying the waters” and creating deep inconsistencies.
Crenshaw pointed to a major contradiction: while the SEC staff declares many crypto assets are not securities, the agency has simultaneously approved spot ETFs for assets like Ethereum and Solana — a move that implies they are, in fact, securities. She described this approach as “opportunistic” and argued it undermines the effort to build a coherent regulatory regime.
The debate inside the SEC highlights the complexities of applying decades-old laws to new technology. The Crypto Task Force continues to seek public input as it works toward establishing a lasting and consistent framework. With pressure from the White House to create rules tailored to the unique nature of digital assets, more changes are undoubtedly on the horizon.
For now, the crypto industry has gained valuable clarity in specific areas, but the broader conversation about how to regulate this rapidly evolving ecosystem is far from over.
GFEX Official
Support dialog
