The current Web3 world has only addresses, no soul, and lack of sociality

It is also said that there are currently 10,000 users and 100 project parties in the circle who are playing with different skins repeatedly...

At present, the interaction or social relationship between the project party and the participants is relatively simple. Follow the cycle, Twitter interaction, Discord activity, testing activity, AMA activity, invitation contribution, bug submission, suggestion submission. Most of the behaviors ultimately point to the token airdrop economy. Incentive expectations, and in this final link, there are often unpleasant situations, such as the project party not fulfilling or not fully fulfilling the promise, such as witch identification disputes, scientists diluting the income of normal users, etc. After the airdrop is completed, even just After the snapshot of the airdrop is completed, the community atmosphere will dissipate immediately. The airdrop is withdrawn and realized, and a love story will come to an end. Only some users who participate in community building and use the product are not only attracted by the airdrop.

During this process, the project side has thought of many ways, such as increasing the weight of participating in-depth addresses, increasing the weight of periodic participating addresses, cooperating with a series of AMA, POAP, OAT vague hints to continuously kidnap the attention of participants, and others Using NFT or FT to continuously empower dolls layer by layer to achieve the desired effect, it seems to be effective in a certain period, but in the end it still ends up in the same way.

Of course, I do not deny that some project parties only want the data at this stage to fulfill their capital operation needs, but this is definitely not the best result for project parties who want to develop a business for a long time. The most fundamental reason for this phenomenon, I think, is that the social relationship between the project party and the participants is fundamentally based on transferable economic carriers, such as Token and NFT.

SBT, Soul Bound Tokens, Soul Bound Tokens, Immovable Tokens

If there is a decentralized system to complete the SBT delivery between the project party and the participants, it is similar to a set of labels that the two parties can attach to each other, but they are not attached randomly. Behind all the labels, there are processes and logic on the chain. Supported by evidence, it cannot be tampered with and cannot be transferred. For example, when user A participated in the first interaction of project N's Twitter and Discord, and what valuable behavior did he provide during the participation process, whether it was real attendance or fake attendance, or copying. Homework is still independent thinking. Is the project party really interacting and listening to opinions, or is it just pretending to just talk and listen? Does the project party really want community building or just shouting a slogan? Is the project party a regular PUA? users and so on.

What are the labels for?

For example, when two people are together, the man A labels the woman B a "golden woman", and there is some evidence behind the tag, such as shopping bills, chat records, and conversation recordings. This tag is only established in the relationship between A and B. Relatively independent but globally visible, each individual label can be used as a reference for another individual. Maybe when B and C are together after a breakup, B is labeled as "virtuous", sometimes it is not how good a person is. How bad it is, but whether you have met the right person.

Of course, the labels in a small number of relationships are actually very inaccurate and may even be distorted, but if there are enough cycles and events, the labels will increasingly reflect some characteristics. If more participants and project parties are thinking about If this field is serious about long-term construction, short-term and distorted data will be continuously diluted and corrected, and these labels will become more accurate over time. Even if 100 girls have enough tags to show that they are normal human beings, there is a high probability that he is a scumbag. If a participant A is considered a witch attacker by the recent 50 projects, then A has a high probability of being a witch account. Some people may say that if my address is marked with a bad label, it would be better for me to open a new address. Although the new account has no historical burden, it is not an easy task to re-establish the labeling system, and it may even be an unlabeled account. The weight of accounts with bad tags is much lower, and how to make suicide more expensive is also a thing to think about.

In general, this is the sum of a set of social labels and a set of consensus inductions, including the consensus inductions between various project parties and various participant groups. Of course, this needs to be based on the premise that the project party and the participants are willing to improve the social labeling system. Here is just a brief discussion of some possibilities. How to make this system work requires more specific details. designed to support.