Welcome to wenser’s special column in web3.

Recently,Kevin Rose, the founder of Moonbirds NFT project announced that all of moonbirds nfts are open up for CC0( Creative Common Zero ),and after the launch of nouns and mfers and goblintown, there’s another famous nft project became one of the CC0 projects,and the difference between Moonbirds and other active CC0 NFT projects,the choice and the results of Moonbirds looked like the helpless action in a bear market.

Thank to the occasion of CC0 NFT projects, I will give 8 Q&As about some aspects of them,and try my best to draw some conclusions about CC0 NFT projects for learning and communication with different ppl who are interested in those topics.

The text is as follows:

A: The purpose of #CC0 of #NFTs project is divided into two types: active VS passive, which have very different purposes.

Active: 1) Open up copyright to stimulate creativity; 2) Lower expectations and reduce operational pressure; 3) Call for co-creation and build a decentralized ecology-eg. pepe; mfers.

Passive: 1) find nominal excuses; 2) reduce operating expenses; 3) provide hype topics; 4) divert the community's attention.

The right of choosing CC0 belongs to those rules-makers,not the rest of normal people.

A: The advantages of CC0 are——

1. decentralization; 2) interest-added; 3) scalability; 4) public domain consensus.

The disadvantages of CC0 are——

1. decentralized decision network; 2) limited commercial value; 3) mixed quality of works; 4) conflicting private domain consensus.

Therefore, the more suitable NFT projects for CC0 are——

1. commercial dilution type; 2) artist creativity type; 3) interest community type; 4) content co-creation type; 5) social experimentation type.

It's the game for little players and startups and newbies,and for those big players,it doesn’t matter actually,thus the actions of those changes look like the free promotions and a campaign.

A: 1) A promoter with strong charisma;

1. Enough rich fans and members;

2. Key nodes driven by strong interests;

3. Hot topic makers and troublemakers;

4. Closed-loop ecology of content, media and social;

5. Consensus-bearing "container"; 7) Branch plot tasks.

For #NFTs in the "license first, CC0 later" model, the focus is on 2/5/6/7.

A: #CC0 brings relative freedom, but also destined to relative restrictions, specifically, the possible directions include.

1. Pure interest-driven community; 2) Consensus-divided group; 3) Semi-commercial experiment subject; 4) Social experiment specimen; 5) Cultural trendsetters; 6) DAO experimental models.

To put it more directly, the future of CC0 projects is determined by "key nodes" and "powerful works".

A: Potential problems - 1) Commercial ownership disputes; 2) Community consensus conflicts; 3) Confusion of information deposit; 4) Excessive abuse of authorization, etc.

Concerns - 1) identity; 2) fast decaying interest; 3) blurred focus; 4) confusion of authority and responsibility; 5) public opinion.

Compared to centralized non-CC0 projects, CC0 may not collapse until it collapses like a mountain.

After @moonbirds, CC0 has become the last refuge after the collapse of those holders’ consensus.

A: As the "inexplicable container", NFT's next step depends on

1. e-commerce into the lifestyle scene;

2. gamefi access to the entertainment scene;

3. VR/AR into the social scene.

4. DAO access to productivity scenarios.

5. as the key to Metaverse.

After the baptism of style, type, hype, and equity, NFT must move from the virtual to the real.

A: No. Soul Bound Token is more on the identity side, with its Non-Fungible attributes of "companionship", "exclusivity", and "proof". "NFT should be more flexible, not "more rigid".

#SBT is also difficult to resolve conflicts at the level of data rights and protocol interoperability, and the soul should not be bound or quantified.

The land was not made of some silos.

A: 1) Content-based - rely on media content, social content, professional content to support development; 2) Commercial - exploring commercial products and development models, seeking profit returns and ecological structure. 3) Community type - accommodating the widest degree of members, social relationship precipitation and binding. 4) Chicken feather type - consensus collapse, scandals revealed, crowd deterioration, a chicken feather.

Avoid-CC0 = consensus creat 0.

A: absolutely, No.

In my opinion, CC0 is the interesting and expanded way for everyone to make their creativity into the reality and let their dreams come true,u can find the followers by CC0 creations and works,but the limitation of CC0 is obvious,and decentralised ownership means low effective speed in a way,and it’s more suitable for those who wanna to try something new and just for fun or meme.

CC0 NFT projects look like the different paper or picture,no matter who wanna to draw sth,it’s okay,but only CC0 isn’t enough,that’s just a start or the seed.It can be pregnant to something bigger and biggest,but it can’t be big.

And by the way, CC0 is not the most powerful for creations and those pieces of pics,videos,audios and other forms of data and informations,above all, there’s trademark and patents in terms of rights.

https://twitter.com/wenser2010/status/1556200638039465984?s=20&t=EisjTFUMzACKcUbhhLgC9g

Welcome to wenser’s special column in web3.

Recently,Kevin Rose, the founder of Moonbirds NFT project announced that all of moonbirds nfts are open up for CC0( Creative Common Zero ),and after the launch of nouns and mfers and goblintown, there’s another famous nft project became one of the CC0 projects,and the difference between Moonbirds and other active CC0 NFT projects,the choice and the results of Moonbirds looked like the helpless action in a bear market.

Thank to the occasion of CC0 NFT projects, I will give 8 Q&As about some aspects of them,and try my best to draw some conclusions about CC0 NFT projects for learning and communication with different ppl who are interested in those topics.

The text is as follows:

A: The purpose of #CC0 of #NFTs project is divided into two types: active VS passive, which have very different purposes.

Active: 1) Open up copyright to stimulate creativity; 2) Lower expectations and reduce operational pressure; 3) Call for co-creation and build a decentralized ecology-eg. pepe; mfers.

Passive: 1) find nominal excuses; 2) reduce operating expenses; 3) provide hype topics; 4) divert the community's attention.

The right of choosing CC0 belongs to those rules-makers,not the rest of normal people.

A: The advantages of CC0 are——

1. decentralization; 2) interest-added; 3) scalability; 4) public domain consensus.

The disadvantages of CC0 are——

1. decentralized decision network; 2) limited commercial value; 3) mixed quality of works; 4) conflicting private domain consensus.

Therefore, the more suitable NFT projects for CC0 are——

1. commercial dilution type; 2) artist creativity type; 3) interest community type; 4) content co-creation type; 5) social experimentation type.

It's the game for little players and startups and newbies,and for those big players,it doesn’t matter actually,thus the actions of those changes look like the free promotions and a campaign.

A: 1) A promoter with strong charisma;

1. Enough rich fans and members;

2. Key nodes driven by strong interests;

3. Hot topic makers and troublemakers;

4. Closed-loop ecology of content, media and social;

5. Consensus-bearing "container"; 7) Branch plot tasks.

For #NFTs in the "license first, CC0 later" model, the focus is on 2/5/6/7.

A: #CC0 brings relative freedom, but also destined to relative restrictions, specifically, the possible directions include.

1. Pure interest-driven community; 2) Consensus-divided group; 3) Semi-commercial experiment subject; 4) Social experiment specimen; 5) Cultural trendsetters; 6) DAO experimental models.

To put it more directly, the future of CC0 projects is determined by "key nodes" and "powerful works".

A: Potential problems - 1) Commercial ownership disputes; 2) Community consensus conflicts; 3) Confusion of information deposit; 4) Excessive abuse of authorization, etc.

Concerns - 1) identity; 2) fast decaying interest; 3) blurred focus; 4) confusion of authority and responsibility; 5) public opinion.

Compared to centralized non-CC0 projects, CC0 may not collapse until it collapses like a mountain.

After @moonbirds, CC0 has become the last refuge after the collapse of those holders’ consensus.

A: As the "inexplicable container", NFT's next step depends on

1. e-commerce into the lifestyle scene;

2. gamefi access to the entertainment scene;

3. VR/AR into the social scene.

4. DAO access to productivity scenarios.

5. as the key to Metaverse.

After the baptism of style, type, hype, and equity, NFT must move from the virtual to the real.

A: No. Soul Bound Token is more on the identity side, with its Non-Fungible attributes of "companionship", "exclusivity", and "proof". "NFT should be more flexible, not "more rigid".

#SBT is also difficult to resolve conflicts at the level of data rights and protocol interoperability, and the soul should not be bound or quantified.

The land was not made of some silos.

A: 1) Content-based - rely on media content, social content, professional content to support development; 2) Commercial - exploring commercial products and development models, seeking profit returns and ecological structure. 3) Community type - accommodating the widest degree of members, social relationship precipitation and binding. 4) Chicken feather type - consensus collapse, scandals revealed, crowd deterioration, a chicken feather.

Avoid-CC0 = consensus creat 0.

A: absolutely, No.

In my opinion, CC0 is the interesting and expanded way for everyone to make their creativity into the reality and let their dreams come true,u can find the followers by CC0 creations and works,but the limitation of CC0 is obvious,and decentralised ownership means low effective speed in a way,and it’s more suitable for those who wanna to try something new and just for fun or meme.

CC0 NFT projects look like the different paper or picture,no matter who wanna to draw sth,it’s okay,but only CC0 isn’t enough,that’s just a start or the seed.It can be pregnant to something bigger and biggest,but it can’t be big.

And by the way, CC0 is not the most powerful for creations and those pieces of pics,videos,audios and other forms of data and informations,above all, there’s trademark and patents in terms of rights.

https://twitter.com/wenser2010/status/1556200638039465984?s=20&t=EisjTFUMzACKcUbhhLgC9g