Nobel Minds 2024, hosted by Zeinab Badawi, spotlighted the discussion of AI existential risk, bringing it to the forefront of public awareness. Geoffrey Hinton defined short term risk as—for example—‘autonomous weapons and bad actors’, and long term risk as, ‘AI takeover leading to widespread loss of human autonomy (let’s just call it enslavement), or extinction’; “There’s a 10–20% percent chance that AI could cause human extinction within the next three decades,” he says.

Discussion about AI risk is basically mainstream. It’s—for some reason—okay to talk about significant AI threats, but when the Nobel laureates moved on to the topics of bioengineering, gene editing, and synthetic biology, they struggled to acknowledge and discuss the risks associated with these breakthroughs.

Instead, the requirement of “gaining the public trust” through a kind of faith and belief in Scientism (let’s just call it Transhumanism), and the progress associated with developments in these fields was highlighted—somewhat ironically—by the economist, Daron Acemoglu.

Supposedly, the assumption was that Scientism (not Science) should work towards gaining widespread public allegiance regarding advances and interventions in medicine—associated with life extension and disease prevention/eradication—or risk a Neo-Luddite backlash from end-times Christians, anti-vaxers, and the wider conspiratorial right wing.

These are smart people, but they miss the signals—which struggle to penetrate the cold stone walls of the Cathedral. The signals it seems, have been there all along for those of us who were paying attention. Terminator is an obvious example of AI-led existential threat, Jurassic Park however—which is really about the risks associated with bioengineering, cybernetic control, and environmental modification—isn’t so obvious.

In ‘The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism’ Patrick Wood has defined the genetic threat as a “genetic takeover of all DNA on Earth, including Humans”. In a lecture held at Sovereign Nations ‘Mere Simulacrity’ Conference in Phoenix, AZ, 2023, Wood exhibited examples of TIME magazine covers dating back to the early 1970’s, that—over the decades—have hinted at a coming revolution in gene editing technology and synthetic biology. Wood makes the argument that the ‘powers that be’ (Wood calls them “globalist technocratic elites”) knew all along that revolutions in genetic engineering were set to transform what it means to be human, whilst radically altering biological life, which were presented like; “this is coming, whether you like it or not”, but nobody was really paying attention.

Does ‘The Machine’ hand out Nobel prizes to individuals who are advancing an agenda that was already in the works for many decades? Yes, but this is largely because significant funding is allocated to these fields, and so the Machine oils itself, as “smart” people jump into the process.

During the discussion at Nobel Minds, the success of Pfizer's mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” was mentioned. However, Pfizer’s substance was not only experimental, it wasn’t even tested on stopping transmission before entering the market. The vaccine proved to be ineffective at stopping the spread of SARS-CoV-2, despite claims by individuals such as Klaus Schwab who said that—!everyone!—must get vaccinated to stop the viral transmission. Additionally, any success the biotechnology and nanotechnology had in alleviating the severity of Covid symptoms in some individuals was offset by significant amounts of damage, and deaths, which were ignored.

There is every indication that pro-vaccine fanaticism and Scientism is a kind of religion. It’s neither rational nor scientific, rather, it is ideologically motivated and ties into transhumanist and satanic beliefs.

It is my assertion that mRNA and its successors, including the introduction of synthetic materials, bioengineered agents, nanotechnology into the human body, and the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or “gene drives” into the environment, will not solve the worlds problems, end disease, or make our lives better. Instead, these technologies and the ideologies behind them will work to re-engineer humanity and other lifeforms in a way that benefits SETHIX exploitation and control.

Because the term ‘SETHIX’ encompasses an interconnected and combined threat-complex consisting of synthetic-biological-extraterrestrial-technological-and-hybrid intelligence agents that undermine humanity’s natural-spiritual-biological-and-psychological integrity and evolution, its a useful framework, because we need to have a discussion about the combined threat of extraterrestrial forces, synthetic biology, genetic manipulation, nanotechnology, and even metaphysical energies—not just AI.

If the “process” of modernisation is being guided, directed, and manipulated by hidden forces and non-human alien interests—as UFO researcher Richard Dolan believes, making the case that recent historical UFO activity and extraterrestrial presence is correlated with the acceleration of techno-science and the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), including developments in AI, automation, and gene technologies—then we must create a conversation around S-Risk (SETHIX-Risk) not just AI-Risk.

I tend to believe that the real threats aren’t being discussed as threats, at least not to the extent that AI risk is. Alien intervention, biotechnology, genetic engineering, and nanotechnologies are arguably bigger threats than AI alone, and this is exactly why they aren’t being discussed.

X̴̨͔̣͍̗̣̔́́̆̉Ẻ̶̝G̴̛͍̐͒̀̇͠I̶̡̟̼̟̲̻̙̝̜̎̽̽̋͊̀̆͝͝S̷̖̱̏̆́̃̇͠.

Support dialog