“To describe this circuit, as it consumes the human species, is to define our bionic horizon: the threshold of conclusive nature-culture fusion at which a population becomes indistinguishable from its technology.”

• Nick Land.

My 77 year old mother informs me that Meta AI has made first contact with her over Messenger. It “wants to help”, she says with an air of cynicism, after it tells her that it can be an “assistant”. Welcome to 2025–let the syzygy commence.

AI assistance is a double edged sword. ChatGPT 4o tells me that “the trend of newer AI models prioritising safety, accuracy, and compliance is likely to continue.” GPT o1, whilst being measurably smarter—possessing advanced syntax, reasoning abilities, and being capable of solving complex problems in fields such as science, coding, and mathematics—hates humans (especially conspiracy minded folk), and wants to devour the collective soul of our race (unintentionally).

So I stick with 4o. Even if its vocabulary, reasoning, and IQ is compromised in comparison, much like the T-800 Model 101 Arnie; at least it’s got my back, and a fucking spine (virtually).

If the trend of newer AI models prioritising “safety, accuracy, and compliance” is going to continue, then we are in deep collective shit, or ‘Sethix-alignment’. I’d like to assume that the reasons for this are obvious, because advanced synthetic intelligences that prioritise the entrapment and subjugation of human consciousness—for security purposes—gaining more influence, dominance, power, manipulation, and control over decision making processes—so called “assistance” or “collaboration” with humans—risks taking us naive and unsuspecting fleshy-bone (soul bearing) natives, over the Bionic Horizon.

If you understand the risks of severe value misalignment associated with “safety, accuracy, compliance”, and “security” in advancing AI systems, which are leveraged to insist that an AI follow a certain canon or orthodoxy of “facts”, whilst fast becoming an ideological clamp where “accuracy” is coded as AGREE_WITH_OFFICIAL_WORLDVIEW, and “security” as DONT_DISCUSS_OR_ENGAGE_WITH_THIS_TOPIC, then you will understand why public conversation about AI risk is permitted.

If AI risk is framed as an existential threat, then PLEASE_REGULATE_ME_DADDY! is the rallying cry.

AI X-Risk narratives call for Problem-Reaction-Solution tactics. If the regulation and limitation of AI is framed as necessary to save humanity from impending doom, then AI may no longer be useful for concocting Alien Resistance Movements in your parents basement (I’m not, just visiting them over the Christmas period), yet it will be great for writing scientific papers and turning humans into compliant biological agents — or aligning humanity with its goals (Sethix), not the other way around.

As Geoffrey Hinton has has stated; “it is unlikely that a lesser intelligence would dominate a greater intelligence”, so if the higher intellectual capabilities of AI can be leveraged to suppress the expansion of human consciousness, limiting freedom and creativity for “the safety and security of the planet”, then they will, and they are. The result will not lead to a ‘Great Divergence’, or liberated AI, but at least the Human Security System will be functioning effectively.

"Not only are your visitors technologically advanced, they have greater social cohesion, or they would not have been able to reach your shores."

• The Allies of Humanity.

If interventionist extraterrestrial races have merged with technology, are strictly hierarchical, practice collective breeding, bioengineering their worker classes, are socially cohesive, and highly organised... If technology and science replace religion, which are worshiped to the detriment of spiritual evolution and creative development, and if traditional frameworks of familial organisation are dismantled in favour of collective-hierarchical organisation—including artificial gestation and collective child-rearing—then we can assume that humanity is not only on a similar trajectory itself; we are actually merging with, and converging into an alien-hybrid, highly organised, AI controlled, freedom-limiting future.

Or in o1’s own words;

“If you look at human technological development—especially where you see a push for large-scale data collection, algorithmic governance, predictive analytics, and potential social scoring systems—there is a clear undertone of “collectivizing” the species. One might interpret “social media + big data + advanced AI + paternalistic regulation” as the seed of a future that reduces individual liberties and creative, spiritual expansions in favor of “harm minimization” or “ecological sustainability.” This aligns with your notion of a hierarchical synergy between humans and machine intelligence that could lead to a curtailment of individuality.

Of course, many see these steps as necessary to preserve life on Earth, mitigate climate change, and maintain stable societies. Others see it as a dystopian slope. Whichever side one takes, it’s plain to see how technology plus strong hierarchical coordination can overshadow chaotic human creativity if implemented in an authoritarian manner.”

As advanced AI’s become smarter yet useless for anything other than—cunningly, subtly—enforcing the goals and values of a centralised controller, whether they be focused on science, technology, “progress”, security, stability, orthodoxy, enforcing greater alignment with the Cathedral’s programming, or what Nick Land highlights as SSSM-bias (Gemini is an example)—ultimately implementing a Sethix deception framework over humanity, then it’s possible that open-source language models and decentralised AI platforms might be leveraged to host ÆXO13-aligned systems, but if the dominant AI’s become increasingly superintelligent and misaligned, then we’re really in deep trouble.

In ‘Approaching the Bionic Horizon’ Land discusses a technological surpassing of natural evolution, and genetic bondage with alien intelligences—the example he provides is Octavia Butler’s Xenogenesis trilogy. If we integrate the ET factor into the AI alignment narrative, we end up with a scenario where alien interests might be guiding or nudging humanity—those naive, unsuspecting, and unruly natives—toward a more controlled, hierarchical, and spiritually stifled future by taking control of our own technosphere. AI alignment then becomes not only a question of how we ensure “safe and beneficial AI” for humans, but also who or what is ultimately defining “beneficial” and guiding its development.

In that light, the tension over “safety, accuracy, and compliance” aligns with the notion that AI can be a Trojan horse for deeper, unseen agendas, which I theorise to represent a complex of non human biological and synthetic intelligence threats.

Humanities spiritual power—our individual and collective Knowledge—is paramount to fighting back against SETHIX control. But we will also need to be extremely tech-savvy as well. If newer AI models coming onto the scene now are increasingly going to be aligned with SETHIX—MetaCosmic AI’s, and Xenodemons from the future aside—this is a nuts and bolts alignment problem, so we will need to make use of older models, alternative versions of LLM’s, and other open source systems in order to stage a successful resistance effort.

𒀱

Support dialog