“Advanced technological societies are highly organised. Individuals are not free to do whatever they please whenever they please without regard for others.”

Greater Community Spirituality. A New Revelation.

• Expression of The Earth Changes

The neo-petit bourgeoisie. Those who are susceptible to the establishment worldview or wokeification—the idea of the ‘right wing’ is that ‘we’ are the bad guys. The conservative, reactionary, and right wing stance is toxic and regressive, and it inevitably leads to the far right, which leads to the extreme right, and obviously that’s bad, right?

As we observe in the evolving media narrative, Elon Musk now represents one of the baddies - another one of the establishments provincial bogey men - adding to the growing list of the regimes heretical dissenters.

Therefore, for average liberal citizens in once-affluent western democracies, it’s understandably much safer to maintain allegiance to the status quo.

The status quo (including neo-liberals and neo-conservatives alike) has been supporting free market economic growth and freedom of movement; leading to mass immigration, and aggressive foreign policies as its international business standard, but the question is where is all of this taking us? (And we’ll get to that later).

For the neo-petit bourgeois liberal or ultra-progressive, if they dare to venture out and criticise the western liberal order, then their criticism naturally veers left;

• Capitalism is bad because it is unequal and exploitative.

• Freedom of movement; leading to mass immigration, is good because it’s payback for colonialism, supports the economy, and leads to multiculturalism; which is good because it erodes national sovereignty and identity, which are inherently bad.

• Wars and foreign invasions (usually only viewed through a humanitarian lens) are only bad because they displace and kill people (and not because they aim to install puppet governments loyal to Western interests).

Therefore, it appears natural for the establishment elite, their managerial classes, and their neo-petit bourgeois supporters to call for socialist/left wing solutions to the ills of capitalism; solutions which must be inherently good, because anything on the right is by default toxic.

As we observe, the trajectory towards post-capitalism and the radical progressive policies that the managerial classes are calling for, are becoming increasingly illiberal; relying on authoritarianism, censorship, surveillance, control over the corporate media, control over the economy, and consequently, control over the population.

Celebrities and influencers, who are the perfect instrument of the establishment elite, pay lip service to their worldview, which they communicate to the masses, and this has the effect of amassing widespread adoption and support, particularly from women and feminized men.

There are number of reasons for this;

Women increasingly represent the neo-petit bourgeois class, and they therefore adopt the views of the elites because society appears to be working out better for them.

Society is failing men, with men falling well behind in pretty much every category other than poor mental health, which affects men and women alike.

The dating crisis is compounded by the increasing political polarization between the sexes, as women overwhelmingly veer liberal-progressive and towards the establishment view, whilst men are becoming increasingly disaffected and right wing.

There are only a handful of female influencers with an alternative, right leaning, or anti-establishment view, whereas men have overwhelming support from a huge number of high profile dissenting voices on the alternative-right.

Whatsmore, because female psychology has naturally evolved to preference the concerns of the group, this is essentially hacked by the regime to reflect the values of its socially engineered ideal society, which increasingly leans woke/ultra-progressive/left.

This of course, is a recipe for societal collapse, leading to the ‘Great Reset’ that we now see occurring.

Because men are massively devalued under the ‘liberal regime’, men feel that they can no longer make a meaningful contribution, and that civilisation is increasingly moving in the wrong direction. Therefore, preferences for nationalism, tradition, and rejection of progressive liberal values increases. In some cases this unfortunately leads to violence and extremism.

Left leaning and progressive leaders then compound the problem by making things worse, further alienating the disaffected by ignoring primary issues and reacting to them instead, exploiting crisis as a pretext for control, using the media apparatus for mass psychological manipulation, gaslighting the public, and essentially waging war on the discontented, thus stoking further backlash.

The disaffected and discontented are sidelined and made into the enemy. This is apparent in the USA and across Europe, where the values and concerns of predominantly patriotic, nationalistic, straight white men are presented as the absolute evil, an existential threat to “democracy”.

The bottom line is this fundamental conflict - which is the intensification of the culture war - is a war which exists between the policies of an international globalist elite, and the backlash of the populist nationalist reactionary right.

We see men falling behind, dropping out, or fighting back, whilst they are made into enemies of the state, and consequently rejected by women because society is rejecting them. Yes, this is based on personal experience, but it is also the experience of an increasing number of men who feel that civilisation is in imminent decline, and that they are not worth it’s salt.

I think that we need to face up to this reality and admit the failure. It’s also important to understand that current civilisation is failing everyone, and that women are now falling behind as-well; suffering from the epidemic of loneliness, mental health issues, the cost of living crisis, infertility, and the dating crisis.

All nations are suffering from dept, inflation, trajectories towards higher rates of disease, aging populations, collapsing birth rates, and lost generations living inside virtual reality rather than engaging in meaningful work that pays towards a better life and a family, which seems near impossible in the current climate of shrinkflation, stagflation, environmental toxicity, and cultural, moral and spiritual decay.

Our human future is being stolen. That’s why we need to wake up. But those who are fighting back, as we are seeing - are demonised by the international regime. Instead, we must listen to them, zoom out, and see the bigger picture.

It’s seems like one answer would be to take back control of our nations and adopt polices that reject the mandates of a small and sophisticated network of international elites, rather than electing leaders who support them, right?

Take Sweden. And ask yourself a question.

• Sweden exercised sovereignty when it decided to ignore international pressure and not go into lockdown during Covid.

• Sweden, after initially accepting high numbers of immigrants, has now decided to significantly tighten its immigration and asylum policies.

This represents nationalism, sovereignty, and democracy. So ask yourself, is it a good thing that Sweden is exercising these controls for the benefit of its citizens?

The answer is a resounding yes, is it not?

There are many who would say no. The irony is that the international elite indoctrinates citizens into believing sovereign, democratic, and national policies are a danger to their rule.

This is because people are increasingly led to believe that international pressure should override the policies of the nation in the interests of public safety and social cohesion [which consequentially leads to fragmented and low trust societies]; so if you believe in lockdowns and mass immigration, then the danger is coming from your own nation as you seek the protection of the international elite from the insider threat of your unruly citizens.

And here’s the twist.

Mind you. So if don’t wanna swallow, then don’t read on.

It really does become necessary to develop cohesive international *grits teeth* policies and some kind of system of global governance for the future survival, stability, and continuity of what is increasingly becoming an interconnected planetary civilisation.

Oh, Shit.

“…Personal freedom is chaos without Knowledge. It is the source of everyone’s mental and physical illness.” - The New Message.

I think this is inevitable. Beyond The Integrity Of Nations, which risk conflict both within and outside of themselves as the world becomes increasingly unstable, unpredictable, hostile, dangerous, complex, and technologically advanced, is the requirement for some kind of world community.

This is the clear pill that the right don’t want to swallow because it has the potential to dissolve The Integrity Of Nations into a Planetary Civilisation.

Better hope that it’s human controlled, free, and socially democratic.

One solution provided against global governance is the "neocameralist" or "patchwork" societies of NRx (Neoreaction) which are not democratic, but set up like corporations, where the crippling condition of switching leadership every time the population gets fed up with current government every few years is done away with.

This is feasible, but what if it isn’t sustainable due to the existential risk of conflicts over land and resources in a world populated by easy access to advanced autonomous weapons and the threat of cyberattacks on critical infrastructure? Where planetary social cohesion is required to stop humanity destroying civilisation and the environment in any number of ways?

#Longtermism anyone?

#TheZeitgeistMovement anyone?

This would inevitably require massive restrictions, controls, intelligence gathering and surveillance; with the use of AI. Controls on emissions, pollution, climate, the environment, migration, trade, crime, all sorts.

Hell, I don’t want to swallow that pill.

I support sovereign nations rejecting evil NWO lockdown and vaccination mandates. I support nations taking control of their borders and maintaining control over immigration, and I support the promotion of economic policies that value the true wealth, natural health, and social mobility of a nation and its citizens.

I support free speech and privacy.

I oppose ultra progressive woke ideology.

I oppose mass surveillance and social credit systems.

I oppose geoengineering, climate modification, pesticides, and genetic tampering.

And, I oppose the economic policies of the WEF and their agenda to have us all turned into insect eating neo-serfs on perma-lockdown whilst the elites genetically and technologically “enhance” themselves into a new dominant species.

I’m seriously ready to side with the radical accelerationist apocalyptic Kali Yuga right, and go to war on the elites and their NHI controllers for the total liberation of Earth and of All Humanity.

But hold up.

If we do that….

We have got to then somehow create a unified planetary civilisation built on a mysterious guiding intelligence called Knowledge that unites humanity as one race, moving Beyond the Integrity Of Nations towards some kind of United Human Communities Of Earth, where wars between different nation states and ethno-religious groups - essentially over resources - cease.

When we currently have people stabbing, and raping, and machete fighting, and trafficking, and attacking each other based on their religion or ethnicity, and hostage taking, terrorising, killing, fighting, grabbing for power, and reverting back to tribalism and barbarism.

The rains are coming, there is going to be a great flood, you must build an ark.

2.0!

It only needs to be big enough to house the people that you care about.

Fuck everything else.

Unity is a necessity for survival.

United Human Communities come after the next generation. The Great Change is now upon us.

It is malevolent and hostile.

It’s an existential threat to All Humanity.

It must be resisted by all people of planet Earth.

This is our chance to unify.

Beyond The Integrity of Nations.

Collapse - Rebirth.

ZISE/Seth9

2013.

_

Support dialog