Note: I originally wanted to resist SEO optimised conditioning and social-entrainment by titling this entry simply; "Fuck Digital IDs", but caved.

I have previously discussed (here, and here) how digital IDs are linked to the alien agendas, and by extension, the Sethix System, which is a techno-Demiurgic control matrix that threatens human freedom.

The problems caused by mass immigration (legal and illegal) into Western nations, the low birth rates (which are declining still), the economic stagflation, the increasing political polarisation, the mental health crisis, and job market crisis (which are set to get even worse due to AI and automation), are going to be compounded by the techno-totalitarian system (predicted by David Icke) that is planned to manage the escalating decline.

Many of the developed Asian countries face similar problems, though with less immigration from poorer, culturally, and ethnically diverse regions, whilst low birth rates are also experienced throughout South America as well. I will however focus on the Western condition, because this represents my lived experience and perspective.

With all of these escalating crisis, Digital IDs are among the most dangerous threats that we face. They must be opposed, and we must work together across the libertarian spectrum to stop their implementation. I will attempt to outline why, and what we must do about it.

Recently, Labour MP Alex Ballinger told Bev Turner of GBNews that “we shouldn’t be talking about some sort of dystopian sci-fi novel,” and that the ID “is not mandatory, you’re not going to have to carry it around in your pocket.” But at the same time, the Labour government is proposing that you will basically not be able to get a job, rent, or buy a house without one.¹

This is already dystopian. It will create a two tiered society, effectively forcing large numbers of people into poverty, exclusion, and marginalisation by the state.

Ballinger said “you give way more data away to social media and tech companies,” but this is not the same thing as total state control and surveillance over all of our activities, which he calls; “interactions with the government”.

So when Bev Turner, and many others raise the concern about how Digital ID’s could link to social credit systems down the line, is there any truth to that?

GPT-5 tells me;

“China’s current social credit system isn’t, at the moment linked to a Digital ID, it’s enforced through a vast surveillance state and a sprawling bureaucratic network of blacklists and databases. Courts, banks, transport authorities, and local governments feed information into it, and those deemed “untrustworthy” can be blocked from flights, trains, loans, or public tenders, while others are rewarded for compliance. It isn’t a single score, but a bureaucratic web that quietly shapes how people live.”

That’s pretty complicated. Would it not be so much easier to enforce a social credit system with a single Digital ID, as Alex Ballinger describes it?

I believe—and it seems that many others do also—that the trajectory towards these kind of "gamified" oppressive systems is inevitable, unless we resist.

“It’s already used in many European countries,” as Ballinger points out, and although no government is linking it to a social credit score yet, or for that matter a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), this is only a matter of time.²

• Survival Lilly on YouTube outlines the reality of the Digital ID situation in the EU, which certainly is dystopian. Link in the footnotes.³

For example, here in the UK a "BritCoin" is already in the works, and as a result of these planned interventions, there is now a growing awareness and backlash from the general public, and also from the alternative, libertarian, and right wing media (like GBNews, Spiked, The Spectator, Talk TV) but also from some small elements of the lib-left, that these will be used to enforce an unprecedented level of state control.

Beyond this, we see a growing awareness emerging—you could even call it an awakening—that the sustainable development goals of the United Nations, the World Economic Forum and its Great Reset, the communitarian-socialist ideology of the Fabian society, the “asset-management”, or buying up of vast quantities of land by companies like BlackRock, and the hidden agendas of secretive groups or cabals, are basically all aligned with a 'New World Order' type scenario.

It is yet another step to also understand that there is a persistent and ongoing alien intervention that is linked to these processes and agendas. This is a realisation that more and more of us are going to have to come to terms with.

For now, let’s focus on a mass non-compliance with Digital ID.

It is being reported that Kier Starmer is perhaps the most unpopular prime minister in British history. Trust in the government is at an all time low, whilst many even claim that there could be some form of civil war — although I argue that a military coup is a better and more peaceful scenario.

We have devolved into a low trust society, and with the problems that we face as a result of the government, mass immigration and the economy, the sudden announcement of Digital IDs, when it wasn’t in the Labour Parties manifesto—although they had clearly been planning this for decades through the Blair network—are bound to face significant backlash. 

GPT-5 also tells me;

“Digital ID’s represent a fundamental change to the fabric of the country, despite never being part of Labour’s election mandate. One theory is that it’s being rushed through precisely because the Government is deeply unpopular after failing to deliver on its promises, and because Starmer could soon be replaced by a less ‘malleable’ successor. In other words, Blair and his backers may see the window of opportunity closing. That makes it all the more urgent to stop this reckless, ill-conceived, and damaging project.”

It is often claimed that the English, the British, and the Anglophones at large are less conformist, or less desiring of state interference and government overreach than elsewhere. Britain does have a rich history of rebellion and revolt, but it is also the case that all over the world, we see examples of human resistance against authoritarian regimes.

Many East Asian countries for example have witnessed massive push back against authoritarianism from citizens. Hong Kongers are ethnically Chinese, but the spirit of the pro-democracy protests against the CCP can be characterised as embodying ideals that we usually associate with the 'far West'; liberty, individualism, democracy, etc. Even in mainland China itself, the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 in Beijing are a historical example of anti-government and pro-democracy rebellion, and more recently, there was the White Paper protests against zero-Covid policies. The Milk Tea Alliance rebellions have swept across South East Asia in recent years, whilst in Nepal you have Gen-Z led protests after government bans on social media, and mass anti-government protests in Indonesia.

In authoritarian regimes all over the world, citizens will rebel if the government pushes them far enough. Whilst the conditions that force rebellion are complex; this is a deeply human, and in many ways spiritual response to tyranny.

Although such ideals aren’t inherently English, British, or even Western, as people from many ethnicities, cultures, and backgrounds desire freedom and can relate to it as a universal principle, you could also argue that the West has had a significant influence and monopoly on liberty, with the British exporting enlightenment values to places like Hong Kong, as I outlined. Additionally in Britain itself, there are for example many second or third generation immigrants of African origin who also embody these same principles. And then you only have to look the USA, and what it represents despite its history and its problems.

My argument here sounds somewhat leftist, as it acknowledges the role of culture in shaping psychology. But the reality is undeniable as you only have to look at Christianised Africa and South America, which represent some of the more positive consequences of colonialism.

(I am not an apologist for European colonialism, but many of the colonised cultures, such as those in South America had descended into demonism and human sacrifice, or for example widow burning in India.)

Leftists however cherry pick and choose their arguments. For example, many leftist perspectives might argue “you can’t be made homosexual or transgender by society” but the truth is that you can. Just as you can “perform gender”(in their own language and logic), people can be made or engineered to be more liberal, progressive, or reactionary by their respective social conditions.

This does not negate the reality that an essential aspect of being exists, independent and uncorrupted by nature, society, the family, the state, or environment, because it absolutely does, as you can also be born heterosexual, gay, liberal, conservative, narcissistic, or whatever, as much as the environment can shape you into those respective categories.

You being gay, or liberal might be a result of your soul-profile, karmic-residue, environmental pollutants, early in-utero nutrition, or your familial or cultural environment. The bottom line is that many complex factors play out in determining political, sexual, or whatever orientation you align with; encompassing a range of spiritual, genetic, social, cultural, psychological, and environmental factors.

A generalised ethno-rightist argument might be that certain values are essentially inherent within the white-European races, and as much as other races or cultures might be influenced or inspired by them, they cannot fully embody the same civilisational character, as each race, culture, and civilisation has its own unique qualitative attributes. I don't disagree with this position, but it gets complicated, because for example ethnic Germans, Celts, and the English are not the same, many races have historically built great civilisations, and therefore lumping various white races together under the same common principles is essential erroneous. Effectively, Europe represents a conglomeration of various white ethnic groups, and civilisation is in Europe, but we find no unified European civilisation.

I am aware that this discussion is becoming incredibly complex and long winded, but this is necessary if we are to consider how something like digital IDs might be embraced or rejected by specific ethnic groups, whilst asking questions such as; can we find a common human spirit of resistance and freedom amongst all humanity, alongside the consideration that certain ethnic-tribes (like the English) might actually inspire a worldwide resistance?

So without digressing further into a drawn out psycho-social-spiritual-geographical analysis of why some people desire freedom and others want state control, I will make the claim that I believe that the spirit of liberty is somehow baked into us, and it is particularly prevalent in those who have a far-western orientation. This spirit can hopefully inspire others and be exported throughout the rest of the world; the British are good at that.

Therefore, if there is a sort-of metaphysical archetype or egregore of Western freedom and individualism (and I think that there is) which is particularly prevalent in the far-Western isles, then we must utilise that frequency, because this fucking government—and the forces that are latched onto it—does not represent, or speak for the British people. We are essentially being held hostage by dark, reptilian forces, especially here in the British Isles.

We can talk about how we need a constitution of sorts, or some new form of Magna Carta, or Bill of Rights that limits state power, especially when it’s tied up with internationalist-globalist, corporate, and non human interests...

But fundamentally, and for the time being, we all need to oppose digital ID’s; we need mass non-compliance, just like there was with lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and we need to spread an awareness about how dangerous these IDs are.

If other countries won’t oppose them like the British, then we must spearhead the spirit of non-compliance, and inspire others to reject them as well.

Fuck Digital ID’s.

If more and more countries begin to adopt this system, humanity will lose its freedom, and the technological control matrix will scale and converge into a global state. Nobody will know who is really governing or in control any more, as hidden groups of hybrids and extraterrestrials will be puling the strings through the globalist institutions, which is already happening.

This isn't some far off distant future scenario; it is the threat that we are facing right now.

It's time to REVOLT.

Xegis

¹ Keir Starmer warned Digital ID plans ‘dead in the water’ as millions sign petition (GBNews)

² 98% of People Have No Idea What This Means (Lewis Jackson)

³ EU governments doubling down on Digital ID (Survival Lilly)