The birth of the Tendermint and IBC has enabled robusticity of consensus between untrusted parties and the simplicity of creating independent blockchains that are fully customizable while being interoperable by nature. Today, a significant number of Top 50 blockchains by market

Gnoland is a project that benchmarks against ETH, and its competitors are all L1 layers. In the increasingly crowded public chain track, there are not only “naturally proud” ETH and a group of L2-layer fans, but also rich “money” chains such as BSC and SOL, poly, avax, and Polkadot are also non-stop. Winning over all developers, **Gnoland’s unique advantages may come from:**

(1) The core underlying framework of Cosmos that has been verified: no matter whether Cosmos will be the “optimal solution” for the interconnection of thousands of chains, it has at least made steady progress in the public chain track, and Gnoland has a high starting point.

(2) IBC has good support and compatibility for cross-chain: IBC operation is smooth, who knows who uses it.

(3) Optimization of multi-threading and speed in gnolang language: goroutine may be the most lightweight and lowest-cost multi-threading solution so far.

(4) Lightweight Hub’s protection of smart contract security: Cosmwasm seems to be a solution with faster iteration and lower coupling with the bottom layer of HUB, but it is undeniable that the complexity of Cosmwasm itself is underestimated. An easily overlooked part of community governance is that end users are too optimistic about the implementation of functions and fail to perceive the risks behind smart contracts — we still remember the several downtimes of juno after going online, although there was no loss of property, But the lessons learned from the past will make the safety of lightweight HUBs more important.

(5) Dual-token model: There are different interpretations of the unlimited issuance model of $ATOM. JK launched dual-tokens in Gnoland as desired, while $GNOSH, as a governance token, will be allocated according to the contribution, so as to achieve good decentralization Governance and community leadership can ensure that project development conforms to the vision of community members who are actually building projects.

**Possible disadvantages are:**

(1) Maybe as long as JK speaks, a group of investors will immediately sign the check, but JK still hopes that Gnoland will be community-led, and it is expected that no vc capital will be introduced in the short term.

No capital intervention cannot be regarded as a disadvantage of a project, but it is foreseeable that the number of users and ecology can only rely on word of mouth and the natural fermentation of products in the short term.

(2) Although gnolang is based on the go language that has been launched for 13 years, the application of gnolang in the public chain as a new language still needs to be fully verified by the market and developers.

The birth of the Tendermint and IBC has enabled robusticity of consensus between untrusted parties and the simplicity of creating independent blockchains that are fully customizable while being interoperable by nature. Today, a significant number of Top 50 blockchains by market

Gnoland is a project that benchmarks against ETH, and its competitors are all L1 layers. In the increasingly crowded public chain track, there are not only “naturally proud” ETH and a group of L2-layer fans, but also rich “money” chains such as BSC and SOL, poly, avax, and Polkadot are also non-stop. Winning over all developers, **Gnoland’s unique advantages may come from:**

(1) The core underlying framework of Cosmos that has been verified: no matter whether Cosmos will be the “optimal solution” for the interconnection of thousands of chains, it has at least made steady progress in the public chain track, and Gnoland has a high starting point.

(2) IBC has good support and compatibility for cross-chain: IBC operation is smooth, who knows who uses it.

(3) Optimization of multi-threading and speed in gnolang language: goroutine may be the most lightweight and lowest-cost multi-threading solution so far.

(4) Lightweight Hub’s protection of smart contract security: Cosmwasm seems to be a solution with faster iteration and lower coupling with the bottom layer of HUB, but it is undeniable that the complexity of Cosmwasm itself is underestimated. An easily overlooked part of community governance is that end users are too optimistic about the implementation of functions and fail to perceive the risks behind smart contracts — we still remember the several downtimes of juno after going online, although there was no loss of property, But the lessons learned from the past will make the safety of lightweight HUBs more important.

(5) Dual-token model: There are different interpretations of the unlimited issuance model of $ATOM. JK launched dual-tokens in Gnoland as desired, while $GNOSH, as a governance token, will be allocated according to the contribution, so as to achieve good decentralization Governance and community leadership can ensure that project development conforms to the vision of community members who are actually building projects.

**Possible disadvantages are:**

(1) Maybe as long as JK speaks, a group of investors will immediately sign the check, but JK still hopes that Gnoland will be community-led, and it is expected that no vc capital will be introduced in the short term.

No capital intervention cannot be regarded as a disadvantage of a project, but it is foreseeable that the number of users and ecology can only rely on word of mouth and the natural fermentation of products in the short term.

(2) Although gnolang is based on the go language that has been launched for 13 years, the application of gnolang in the public chain as a new language still needs to be fully verified by the market and developers.