It’s greed and unfair for the three LAUNCH CONTRIBUTORS take a cut of 14% of the 1B Ape coins for just unsuccessfully launching a coin with misleading and ambiguous AIPs (1. Apparently two of five (40%) AIP will not pass; 2. Some OG holders have sold their Ape coins already under the impression that they could just stake NFTs without Ape coins attached.). It’s a joke to pay $1.4B for just little simple legal and codinge works.

Why one of the three LAUNCH CONTRIBUTORS could get 10M tokens upfront without locking, which lets it become the largest single holder(apparent transfered to several addresses already to avoid attention ) with the deciding voting power(6%) now? 6 months after lunch, who will be the largest Ape coin holder ready to drain the staking pools?

Yuga and OG holders are the ones who made the history so far, WE are unique, WE are indispensable; everyone else is replaceable. We should be the owner of our future. We do not need someone else to develop the game, own the game, and invite us as the guests to join their game. We can pay someone else to develop the game. There are lots of great game developers out there.

AIP-2 has allocated 3.2% of the Ecosystem Fund for game development. The game developer could profit from operating the game and earn from game props transaction fees (Yuga and game develop should split the profits).

There are many eco coins lunched so far, Apecoins is the one most favored outsiders.

6% is enough for the three LAUNCH CONTRIBUTORS.