Brandon Donnelly — Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly. — Page 262

This is an interesting chart from the Centre for Urban Research and Land Development at Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU).

It is based on recent population estimates from Statistics Canada, and what it is saying is that the Greater Toronto Area grew by 233,000 people during the 12 months ending July 1, 2023. If you include Hamilton, this number increases to 246,000. And if you include the entire Greater Golden Horseshoe, it increases to 340,000.

This is significantly more population growth compared to any of the six preceding years. And assuming this 2021 population estimate of about 9.8 million people is more or less correct, it represents an almost 3.5% growth rate. That's remarkable. It's also happening at a time when housing starts are declining.

Here's an unproven hypothesis that you can all challenge me on: many or most people only care about the environment while it is convenient to do so. Said oppositely, once it becomes inconvenient to care about the environment, we tend to start prioritizing other objectives.

The example I have in my mind right now is parking. Now, to be clear, cars are not the best mobility solution for the environment. But let's assume for a minute that you need parking and you have only two available options: below-grade parking or above-grade parking.

The former is worse for the environment. If you were to look at the embodied carbon in below-grade parking versus above-grade parking, it would be higher. So from an environmental perspective, you want above-grade parking.

It also makes for more flexible spaces . It's hard to convert below-grade parking to much else. Again, this strengthens the environmental case, because now you're building something that can be repurposed in the future.

However, unless you're forced to only build above-grade parking (as is the case in Miami), many/most cities tend to shun it. The most common objectives are (1) that it's unsightly, and therefore needs to be wrapped with occupiable spaces, and (2) that it kills street life.

What this suggests is that (1) and (2) are seen as being more important than the environment. And I think this is noteworthy in its own right. But here's the other thing: this is arguably a false dichotomy. I mean, does above-grade parking necessarily kill street life?

The above two street view images are from 1111 Lincoln Road in Miami Beach. It's a parking structure and area of the city that I have visited many times. And I have to say, the street life seems fine to me. What do you think?

As a follow-up to last week's post about giving free land to the City of Toronto, I am now thrilled to report that, today at 12:14 PM, we received our building permit!

Some of you were keen to hear about what happened following the post. So here's the update. I published the original post last Wednesday. And to be honest, it received far more attention than I was expecting.

On Thursday morning I received a call from the city. They weren't thrilled about my post, but were very helpful and said that they would ensure the conveyance happened immediately. It then got done before noon that same day.

Planning then sent a note to buildings saying that the permit was ready for issuance. Yay. Buildings acknowledged that they were working on it, and on Monday of this week we received a summary of the outstanding fees and the instructions for the wire transfer.

We paid the fees immediately and on Tuesday we received a payment receipt from the city. Then today -- Wednesday -- we received the building permit. So it was exactly one week from post to permit. A big thanks to everyone who helped to finally move this forward.

Hopefully it's clear that last week's post came strictly from a place of prolonged frustration. I wasn't trying to be mean. Our lawyer reminded me, after the post, that we've actually been working on this land conveyance for over 2 years.