Brandon Donnelly — Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly. — Page 290

https://youtu.be/Gm2gLbsahB8?si=zomleaofwmvwYs6Q&t=442

I have been told by some of you that when I write about snowboarding, you tune out on those days. If you are one of these people, then today is a good day to skip over on the blog. See you tomorrow.

However, if you're not one of these people, and you enjoy exceedingly cool things, then you're going to want to take 6 minutes and -- at the very least -- watch Part III of the above video. Travis Rice is one of the best. And in this Red Bull video he goes from BC to Wyoming. (If for whatever reason it doesn't start in the right place, click here and fast forward to 7:22 for Part III.)

I once heard Quentin Tarantino say that if you choose the right song for the right scene in a movie, you'll never be able to listen to that song ever again without thinking of the movie. (Think Pulp Fiction.) Now, this isn't a movie per se, but it definitely feels like one of those cases. This techno song will forever remind me of this psycho "pillow" run.

Matt Elliott writes a newsletter called the City Hall Watcher. And one of his features is something called Intersection Inspection. It is where he does a deep dive into traffic counts and modal splits for intersections across Toronto. This week , he covered Yonge & St. Clair in midtown, and so I thought it would be interesting to share it on the blog. (Thanks to Canada Record for the tag on X.)

Here are traffic counts for the intersection going back to 1984:

What seems clear is that Yonge & St. Clair is fairly evenly divided between cars and pedestrians. And it has been this way going back many decades. At the same time, though, the volume of cars seems to be declining. According to the above data, cars haven't seen a count above 20,000 since 2014. There does also seem to be a slight spike in bike usage recently (this is broken out further in Matt's newsletter).

Data is crucial to good city building and I don't think it is leveraged nearly enough. For example, take the intersection of Baldwin St and Kensington Ave in Toronto's Kensington Market. If you look at the traffic counts (which can also be found in the above newsletter), you'll see that 88% of traffic tends to be from pedestrians (79%) and bikes (9%). Only 12% of traffic is from cars.

With this data in hand, you might, then, ask yourself: Should Kensington Market be mostly pedestrianized? And in my opinion, this is a lot easier to answer when you have numbers in front of you telling you how humans actually occupy the area.

Utah got a new state flag over the weekend that looks like this:

And I immediately thought of this TED Talk by Roman Mars. For those of you who don't know, Roman is the creator of 99% Invisible and a great lover of well-designed flags. His general rules of thumb are to keep things super simple and to use meaningful symbolism. And I'm fairly certain that he knows what he's talking about because, in his talk, he refers to the Canadian flag as the gold standard for flags.

In the case of Utah's new flag, the symbols are this . The blue at the top is meant to represent Utah's wide-open skies and lakes. The white in the middle represents its snowy mountains (of course). The red stripe is meant to represent Southern Utah's red canyon landscape. The hexagon is meant to reference a honeycomb. And finally, the beehive is there because, well, Utah is the beehive state.

Utah has long enjoyed this reference to beehives. Supposedly, it was early pioneers who started throwing around this reference because they believed it symbolized working together, perseverance, and overall industry. And that's why the state's official motto is, "Industry." So I'd say that they used/kept the right meaningful symbolism.

Though when I first saw the new flag, I immediately wondered whether the hexagon and honeycomb could have been made just a little simpler. Was the yellow fimbriation, for example, really needed within the blue hexagon? But the more I look at it, the more I like it and the more I think that Roman Mars would be happy with how this turned out. What are your thoughts?