Brandon Donnelly — Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly. — Page 708

New York-based Extell Development is, according to this recent WSJ article , in the midst of trying to build a $2 billion full-service ski and snowboard resort near Park City, Utah. It would be the first new resort in the United States in about four decades. These things are, clearly, difficult to get approved, and the fundamentals are, arguably, not all that great. In the early 1990s, the US had about 546 ski and snowboard resorts across the country. As of the 2018-2019 season that number had dropped to 476, according to the WSJ. People are skiing less than they used it, it would seem.

To be a bit more precise on its location, the proposed resort, which is currently called Mayflower Mountain Resort, is to be located next to Deer Valley Resort. And there's even a plan floating around to possibly merge the two resorts. That's apparently what the county planners want. I'm not all that familiar with Deer Valley because they don't allow my kind there (snowboarders). But it's an exclusive resort with a country-club kind of feel (or so I'm told). So it shouldn't come as a surprise that the proposed merger doesn't seem to be getting a lot of traction with the patrons of Deer Valley.

But here's the interesting thing about the Mayflower site. It's generally controlled (to what extent, I don't exactly know) by an entity called The Military Installation Development Authority. And this entity has the power to do things like issue bonds and grant certain land-use approvals. This means that there may be an angle to streamline the approvals process (i.e. make this project actually feasible) and to leverage things like tax increment financing (TIF) in order to fund the project.

Supposedly a new mountain resort has been on the books for this site for some 30 years. Could now finally be the time? If they allow my kind, you can count me in.

Image: WSJ

Joe Berridge's recent opinion piece in the Globe and Mail is a good reminder -- in the face of a whole lot of uncertainty -- about the resiliency of our cities.

Those previous decades saw a surge of people and jobs locating downtown, with consequent escalation in rents and prices of offices and housing. Why? Partly demographic, as the well-educated children of the baby boom reached adulthood, and partly lifestyle and work style. Young people go to big cities not just to work and live, but for sex, style, money and power. For ambition and anonymity. And for risk. All in the petri dish of downtown density. These drives have always been as powerful as their subsequent search for suburban security and community.

The structure of the modern megalopolis is not an accident – the dramatic rise of tech employment, two-earner families, the decline of manufacturing, the later date of marriage, smaller households, lifestyle consumerism, teamwork cultures, serial re-education and training – none of these societal trends looks to be diminished by COVID-19. All of them seem to prefer high-density, high-interaction environments.

For those of us in Toronto, it's also important to remember just how quickly this city region was growing pre-COVID-19. That is unlikely to change on the other side of this.

But Berridge does also point out some of the potential fallouts from this pandemic. The economics of urban transit, for example, could remain a problem for quite some time. This will strain public purses. (Car usage rebounded quickly, but transit ridership has not .)

We are also likely to see increased traffic congestion as a result of people eschewing transit (and probably a bunch of other factors). Like Berridge, I am a supporter of road/congestion pricing, and have been writing about that on this blog for many years .

The best things to tax/price are things that are generally viewed as bad and where demand is largely inelastic. That is, even if you increase the price, many or most people will probably still do it anyway. Think of things like smoking.

Up until now, Toronto hasn't had the moxie to make difficult (political) decisions like this one. Perhaps this pandemic will leave us no other choice.

In life and business I find that we are often faced with decisions that pit emotion against rationality. What I mean by this is that maybe your ego is telling you to do something. And maybe, as a matter of principle, you know with certainty that you're right. But when you take a step back and think about how that principled decision might play out, you realize that it is probably not the right life or business decision.

In the case of the real estate development business, you might realize that it is not the right decision for the project . And that's really the key question to be asking yourself in this business. What is most beneficial for the project ? It is not about what's most beneficial for my ego.

Of course, taking emotion out of the equation can sometimes be difficult. Maybe you feel like you're losing if you give in and don't follow what you think is right. But the truth is that if emotion and rationality don't line up, then you're likely going to have to pick a side. And if you make a bad or the wrong business decision, then you're definitely losing, even if your ego might feel a little better.