Pitcairn online journalists

In recent days, the Office of the Ecology Environment has been briefed on recent examples of environmental law enforcement. Two typical cases are located in safety and well-being, in violation of the law: abnormal operating atmospheric pollution control facilities, circumvention of regulation, and discharge of oils, acids and alkali to water bodies.

Atmospheric pollution control facilities are operated in an irregular manner to avoid regulation and release atmospheric pollutants

In the recent past, EEA law enforcement officers conducted on-site inspections of large-scale brick mills in ponds, which were found to have been damaged in many facilities, such as gas-collecting pipelines and sulphur-ta, without collecting the waste gas generated by dry cooks, and through eight cigarette discharges installed at the top of the drying.

The above-mentioned conduct of the brick factory is in violation of article 20, paragraph 2, of the Act of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Atmospheric Pollution, which prohibits the release of atmospheric pollutants by theft, falsification or falsification of monitoring data, temporary stoppages for the purpose of avoiding on-site inspection, non-emergency emergency opening of emergency release corridors, abnormal operating atmospheric pollution control facilities, etc.

Release of oil, acid, alkali to water bodies is punishable by 3.38 million yuan renminbi

In December 2022, a large number of floating oils occurred on the river into the Lobby of the urban sand river, and the Bureau of Eco-Environment of the city immediately organized the screening of law enforcement personnel. It was detected that, on the morning of 19 December, some of the hydraulic oils were leaked from the surface during the dismantling of the company’s jet by the Group of Eleven, Inc., and that the on-site oil pollution was untreated and washed, resulting in the sewing of the hydraulic oil into the precipitation system, which was depositioned into the river. The monitors conducted sampling monitoring of precipitation drains into river outposts, and monitoring reports indicated that oil-type substances were detected.

The company’s conduct is in violation of article 33, paragraph 1, of the People’s Republic of China Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act, which prohibits the discharge of oil, acid, hydraulic or dready toxic liquids to water bodies.