Columnist of the documentary/new wave financial opinion (Bkopleader)

The current threshold for market-based firms to increase qualifications is too low to preserve the efficiency of the use of refinancing in markets only if it is systematically and definitively disqualified from performance and from refinancing publicly listed companies.

Most recently, the market in Unit A, the “garage unit” and the “garage unit”, has been used to balloons, and the market has genocidally threw up and recurred. In the view of penis, the regulatory branch should direct market value investments with a clear flag, reflecting fair and positive regulatory values.

While the previous market continued, the regulatory sector proposed that it would reduce transaction resistance and enhance market liquidity, some of the relays might be “comprehensible” to allow for arbitrary or even manipulative behaviour. In the penitentiaries, it appears that the shell casing units are used only as carriers, as collectors, as well as as as tenants, as well as more people who have lost their dividends, the market becomes more squatting, and it is proposed that the city of rescue be bombed with exculpatory fire from the market, which is no different from drinking. Thus, in the penitentiary’s view, the regulatory branch optimizes the regulation of transactions only without undue interference in normal transactions, but it is certain that, as in the past, strict regulation of unusual transactions or violations of the law remains.

The decline in stock markets is due to the lack of inward value of many stocks, the higher the waste unit raises, the more the future will be lost, and the inability of people to shrink two times in the same area, as in the case of stock-market regulation. In the future, the blast shell unit would have to be highly alert, and it would not be a rescue city, but a dangerous act of relocating stones to the top of the high mountains.

There is, of course, an underestimation of the current stock market in Unit A, but this is mainly the underestimation of the blue-taker and merit-based unit, which, as was pointed out by the former President of the National Federation of Business and Industry, yellow Mon, “we cannot see ourselves and we escape very fast”. If the value of capital transfers to meritorious and blue-consumption units is found, this will not pose any risk to the market, but rather a sterile business, in which the market will be able to resume its normal price discovery function, so that it will be able to optimize the allocation of resources to you, or if the price of the waste unit is higher than the merit unit, it will only cause waste of resources.

From a regulatory point of view, the academic community considers that the institutional architecture and function of market regulation depends fundamentally on value orientation, which constitutes a space for regulatory value options in the market, i.e. to answer the fundamental questions of regulation, regulation and supervision. The current regulation of securities markets is more popular in terms of “the regulatory orientation of investor protection”, but, in the view of the penis, it is more empty and not elevated to a value or value-oriented high; if it is highly value-oriented, it should be fair and positive to value-oriented, at the core of which is the preservation of the market’s three principles of “equity, fairness, openness” and the protection of investors’ interests can only be a safeguard for their legitimate and public interests.

Previously, in the market of Unit A, the waste unit and the garage unit were much better than the merit-based unit, not only for shell resources to be curable, high prices and, from time to time, for large refinancing from the market, and the waste unit, the garage investor, often received much higher returns than the merit-based investor, with investors feeling that “splits and blue sets” were occurring, a situation that was more relevant to the previous fair value of the market in Unit A and the regulatory orientation. Obviously, the high value of the waste unit, the garage unit and the high profit that investors are joying are at the expense of future investors, such as such vested interests, unprotected values and unprotected ones.

Market cowards do not lend value to equities at the regulatory level, allowing investors to make value judgements, and penists are of the view that the regulatory level does not make value judgements in the value of an individual unit, but does not suggest that regulators should not have value orientation in their regulation. Value-oriented behaviours that are not personal and that are encouraged by the regulatory sector through the creation of bids, rewards and rewards of excellence, which can only lead to poor currency expulsions, eventually leading to the collapse of the A Shared Market, which, in the face of the major problem of survival in the A Shared Market, should be marked by a strong public, positive value-oriented flag, a blurred bluster, a waste unit, and led to the efforts of the listed company to operate upstream, a good business, which is an inherent responsibility of the regulatory base.

Regulatory layers are open, positive value-oriented and should also be reflected in other aspects of regulatory and market mechanisms. For example, in the context of the rebirth system, for market companies with a two-year turnover rate of more than 300-fold per year, there should be a direct rebirth of the market without an investment-valued stock, which hegemons publicly available resources and a vast wealth of wealth.

For example, in the area of refinancing, there is currently a easing of postures, but it should be relaxed to market companies with good performance and governance norms and not to market companies with a waste unit or a basic battery. At present, market companies have too low eligibility thresholds to maintain the efficiency of the use of refinancing in markets only if they are systematically and definitively disqualified from performance and from refinancing publicly listed companies.

(The authors of this paper present: Senior Market Commentator. (b) The situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo;