Since then, the Aca (AMD rolled out a prominent card) has been poorly marketed, generally considering Nka (NVIDIA) in the selection of electrical equipment, and RTX 40 in the new generation.

However, in recent times the market has been marketed with a full new generation of AkaRX7600M XT, while some voices have emerged in the industry, considering that the new Acacaca could be tired with RTX 4060, and whether this is the true result? Today, we are responding to misgivings through actual run-off and play tests.

Basic information

Before formal testing, we look first at the specific data of RX7600MXT and RTX 4060 through GPU-Z.

The TSMC 4N NVIDIA customization process was introduced in RIBA4060, the CUDA numbered 3072, with 8GB GDDR6, with 128 bandwidths and the introduction of a completely new Ada Lovelace structure, with a comprehensive upgrading of the light fence, traceability, in particular DLSS 3.

RX7600MXT uses the RSDNA3 structure, with 32 computational units, 64 fencing units, 2048 flowers, a core frequency of 2300 MHz, with a maximum function of 120 W. Demonstrated as 8GB GDDR6, a significant 128bit.

3D MARK run

Objectively, the base data for GPU-Z are not readily available to determine the gap between the two, and we then test the gap between the next two sections on the data end through the 3DMARK run score.

In the 3DMARK test, RTX 4060 under the Time Spy model was divided into 10329 and RX7600M XT 10310, with no significant difference.

Under the Fire Strike Extreme model tested by 3DMARK, RTX 4060 was divided into 12765, RX7600M XT divided into 13632, under which RX7600M XT was better than RTX 4060.

3A Performance measurement

In theoretical data testing, the two can be called win-win, and it is clear that the theoretical link is really meaning, and we then look at the difference between the two in the same section game.

The first is the Guemetery: the shadow, which has a slightly higher demand for hardware. The picture is even the highest: 2560x1400, DX12 and video choice. The performance of Benchmark, which operates on average 81 per cent (figure 1), is equally strong. In contrast, the playbook of RTX4060 Laptop was tested under the same picture, with a test achievement of 85 baht (figure 2), a gap of less than 5 per cent, with little difference in the game experience of both.

The second game is the “Observator 2: Saving,” whose pressure on hardware is significantly higher than on the former. The paintings were set at 2560x1440, a quality-provisional grade of 5 and an API choice of Vulkan. The performance of Benchmark, which operates on average 70 per cent (figure 1), is not problematic. Similarly, in contrast to the playbook of RTX4060 Laptop, the test results under the same picture are 60 baht (figure 2).

The last part of the game is the “Sybak 2077”, which is very much strained on hardware. The picture is set at 2560x1440, the poster’s super-option, and the final performance of Benchmark is 62.36 baht (figure 1), which is now open. Similarly, the playboard RTX4060 Laptop, whose performance was 53.9 per cent (figure 2), RX7600M XT was approximately 15 per cent, with obvious advantages.

Of course, it is possible to see here why there has been no test of traceability. The reason for this is simple, and the traceability of the AMD visible card remains relatively clear from Great Britain. It is still the case of the Sabok 2077, which will be further improved to 59.29 baht (figure 3) after the opening of the DLSS3 (figure 3) if the forecast is replaced with a light track record: super, the selection of the occupier is 28.4 baht (figure 1), while the playbook on the RTX4060 Laptop is 40.69 帧 (figure 2).

As can be seen from the actual play tests, the play of the puppet occupants, depending on the performance of the RX7600 MXT, is very good, and even in the face of 3A, it is possible to provide less than 60 baht under 2K elder, which means that the vast majority of 3A masters on the market will be able to operate with the trouser. In contrast to the play version of the RTX4060 Laptop, in part of the game, the fencing function is better than the RTX4060 Laptop. However, there remains a clear gap with RTX4060 Laptop in traceability.