Column of the editorial leader of the documentary/new waves (Bkopleader)

The so-called shared economy, C2C, which has ceased to exist long ago, has made it possible for us to abandon the concept of shared economy, to impose a death sentence on it and to leave it together with O2O.

In one event, a sentence was heard, suddenly casing the current events in the Internet world.

This sentence is that the vision of excellence is “to make the journey anywhere as reliable as any one can come to water”. (Uber’s mission statement is “make transportation as reliable as running water, everywhere, for everyone.”) gives preference to what it is doing as much as water, electricity and networking. It is conceivable that, as long as the water is opened, there will always be running out of the water; as long as it is opened, it will always be possible to call the car you need.

This is what the entire Internet world and capital are doing now: the development paradigm of the world on the hedging line, with capital, gradually transforming the world under the line into an inexorable link and service on the class line.

Indeed, for the Internet world, what has been done is “distribution” (distribution), that is, access and distribution. The line was closed and the line started. As a result, numerous new retail projects have been carried out through the occupation channels, and numerous single vehicles have been used to connect users.

As a result, subscriptions and monthly purchases are beginning to occur under the line, as well as shared economies, which can be found in front-line products and services.

It is common. Is there a record in the world that continues to be updated once it is issued? The article made three preliminary judgements:

Electronicization of all non-material consumables;

All electronic products will be clouded;

All cloud-end products will be serviced.

The example given at that time was the music card band, which culminated in the renewal of a subscription.

Now, on the basis of developments in line, I feel that there is a need to add two additional articles:

All non-target products/services will be aligned to standard character attributes;

All substantive products will be subject to a convergence of electronic product attributes.

Ultimately, the development of overall infrastructure under the line will result in an wireless convergence of real goods and services. This will be the goal of all service providers, since only such channels can play a greater role.

In return, it is a matter that Americans have long seen. In the United States, there has never been a reference to the concept of O2O, the closest of which is “On Demand Economy”, which we then translated into “demand economy”. This is the shortest translation I saw.

The emphasis on “demand” was based on demand, but in fact the focus of the word “on” was a dynamic expression.

“on demand” is interpreted in English as “as soon as or whenever requirde”, i.e. to meet demand at all times, focusing on timeliness. This is just as good as it is, the real goods or services under the wire have become as reliable as piped water.

The sharing of the economy is therefore also a hypocrisy.

As I remember before studying this area, there was a more impressive project called “home food”. I feel that this is a particularly lucrative model of shared economy, and I am particularly interested. But many days after I find the platform, it was found that their supply capacity was not sufficient to support the demand for the platform.

I then concluded with a prejudging conclusion under this type of item that the final company was going to operate in the form of a central kitchen, turning some into a professional cook. But it is true that this is contrary to the values and starting points of the platform itself, so I did not continue to look on this path.

Like this item, if we are purposing the C2C platform to share the economy, it is in fact that sharing of economic development is not good or even left. There are also a large number of professionally small B (SMEs) traders in the most representative pierce, and the vast majority of them are in operation. It has to be said that C2C’s shared economy is in fact breaking down. The so-called C2C sharing, culminating in the B2C path, is the corollary of the most efficient supply-driven pursuit.

How can we ease the standards? What is more about transforming ownership of goods/services into use is called shared economies? For example, in the form of B2C, leased economies are not counted?

If this definition is used, dividing, doctrinal and Mosul are counted, but why do cybercafes, hotels not count on shared economies?

I have carefully thought to find that, as long as everything is going to move, everyone feels mobile assets that can be shared, and that, if not, they tend to be fixed assets and infrastructure. As a result, unfacilable shops, emails KTV, etc. were placed in new retail competitions without any mention of a shared economy. What has moved has been a result of the timeliness and readiness to meet needs. This is why it is realized when everyone refers to shared economies, whether it is a matter of “on demand” or of emphasizing the concept of “ready”.

Following the selection of the concept of “on demand”, there is also a hierarchy behind it, which is the provision of “access” under “demand”, which means access to a product or service.

The so-called leases, second-hand transactions, unmanned racks, monthly orders, without exception, are one way of increasing “access” capabilities. The better the “access”, the more people need nothing. After all, for the most part, you have something, that is, to use it at all times when required. For example, the sharing of single cars, when you can see the sharing of single cars at any time.