Tiny Bytes: RSA
tldr RSA works by exploiting the fact we can’t easily factor 2 large prime numbers and group theory to make a trapdoor permutation, aka a function that turns x into y but y can’t easily be turned into x without a secret. However, implementing RSA gets tricky because there’s lots of subtle attacks.MathRSA takes advantage of the group Z^*_{n} (multiplicative group of integers modulo n). This is the non-negative integers less than n that have an inverse modulo n. 1 x 1 mod n = 1. 0 x int = 0 so ...
Tiny Bytes: Chilling
Hi, Just chilling tonight. Aiming to finish up chapter tomorrow. Night, Lucas
Tiny Bytes: Quickie
Hi, Did much more writing on RSA. Will finish soon. Bye, Lucas
Tiny Bytes: RSA
tldr RSA works by exploiting the fact we can’t easily factor 2 large prime numbers and group theory to make a trapdoor permutation, aka a function that turns x into y but y can’t easily be turned into x without a secret. However, implementing RSA gets tricky because there’s lots of subtle attacks.MathRSA takes advantage of the group Z^*_{n} (multiplicative group of integers modulo n). This is the non-negative integers less than n that have an inverse modulo n. 1 x 1 mod n = 1. 0 x int = 0 so ...
Tiny Bytes: Chilling
Hi, Just chilling tonight. Aiming to finish up chapter tomorrow. Night, Lucas
Tiny Bytes: Quickie
Hi, Did much more writing on RSA. Will finish soon. Bye, Lucas
Subscribe to ldnovak
Subscribe to ldnovak
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
<100 subscribers
<100 subscribers
Hi,
Did not preemptively write something so I’m going to try something new and quick.
I’m going to pick a topic and write down quick thoughts.
It still bothers me how police are using self driving cars to monitor people. I don’t like how the police want to use people’s doorbells to spy.
-- That idea of monitoring people is interesting.
Spying is correct but sounds exaggerated. Like it’s a movie.
Surveilling is exact but too wordy of a word.
Watching is also correct but too benign. As if this behavior both harmless and something to be expected as people.
(this idea of expected surveillance/monitoring I think is related to the root of what irks me).
Monitoring is just right. It’s not necessarily malicious but teases the idea of harm. I don’t like being monitored but also understand it’s necessity. I don’t want to be monitored as I cook dinner; I want that freedom. I understand that who get’s access to nukes should be monitored. I want to monitor my heart rate as I sleep. I don’t want Amazon monitoring my heart rate as I sleep.
I wonder if we rephrase our discussion on privacy and surveilling if we can uncover new ways as looking at old problems.
Some areas or purchases require monitoring to be safe. We need cameras to keep people safe.
Night,
Lucas
Hi,
Did not preemptively write something so I’m going to try something new and quick.
I’m going to pick a topic and write down quick thoughts.
It still bothers me how police are using self driving cars to monitor people. I don’t like how the police want to use people’s doorbells to spy.
-- That idea of monitoring people is interesting.
Spying is correct but sounds exaggerated. Like it’s a movie.
Surveilling is exact but too wordy of a word.
Watching is also correct but too benign. As if this behavior both harmless and something to be expected as people.
(this idea of expected surveillance/monitoring I think is related to the root of what irks me).
Monitoring is just right. It’s not necessarily malicious but teases the idea of harm. I don’t like being monitored but also understand it’s necessity. I don’t want to be monitored as I cook dinner; I want that freedom. I understand that who get’s access to nukes should be monitored. I want to monitor my heart rate as I sleep. I don’t want Amazon monitoring my heart rate as I sleep.
I wonder if we rephrase our discussion on privacy and surveilling if we can uncover new ways as looking at old problems.
Some areas or purchases require monitoring to be safe. We need cameras to keep people safe.
Night,
Lucas
No activity yet