If you missed "Part 1 - The Builders Dilema", you'll find it here

We're living through the most exciting time in history to be a builder.

AI tools have fundamentally changed the game. Today, any individual with vision can build products that previously required entire teams. You don't need to raise capital first. You don't need to find co-founders before you start. You can begin building immediately and decide to raise funding or partner with others as you go.

This democratization of innovation is incredibly bullish. A developer in Lagos can compete with a team in Silicon Valley. A designer in Buenos Aires can launch products that reach global audiences. Innovation is no longer constrained by geography, connections, or initial capital.

But this creates a new problem: more solo builders means more fragmented talent, all fighting for the same limited resource—attention.

Most builders think the journey looks like this: Launch → Success

This misunderstanding explains why most of the discourse and focus in the crypto space centers around token launches:

• Everybody's building launchpads

• Everybody's hunting for new hyped launches

• Everybody spends 90% of their time building FOMO toward launch

• Everybody rallies liquidity pre-launch

• Traders spend all their day in “alpha” groups trying to get first access to the new hot launch

This happened because the #1 use case of crypto today is speculation, making token launches a high-stakes speculation game with massive potential profits.

But the reality for builders is completely different: Launch → Build → Grow → Build → Grow → Build → Grow...

Launching is a one-time event. Building and growing is an endless journey.

This is where we mostly fail. We've optimized for the spectacular launch moment while ignoring the long, hard work that comes after. We've turned coordination tools into speculation instruments.

This is why crypto remains a "funny money" hot potato PvP game instead of becoming the coordination revolution it was meant to be.

Here's what's happening: thousands of brilliant builders are working in isolation, each trying to capture attention from the same limited pool of users. We're all competing for the same resource—human focus—in an environment where new products launch daily.

Each builder becomes "married" to their own vision, their own potential token, their own community. We reinvent solutions others have already created. We burn out trying to capture attention while simultaneously improving our products.

The result? A zero-sum dynamic where one builder's success often comes at another's expense.

But what if we flipped the script entirely?

In an era of permissionless innovation—where we have all the tools and protocols to build anything we want—market share and margins naturally commoditize. What truly matters becomes brand strength, aligned values, and network effects.

The smartest builders aren't trying to win against others. They're creating systems where everyone wins together.

Consider what happens when builders coordinate rather than compete:

• Build Faster: Share resources and insights instead of solving the same problems in isolation

• Launch Earlier: Leverage collective networks for feedback, testing, and initial distribution

• Capture More Market Share: A coordinated network of builders can dominate entire categories by supporting each other's growth

This is exactly what we're seeing with successful ecosystems. When builders align their interests and coordinate their efforts, they create something more powerful than the sum of their individual parts.

The future of venture building is collaborative, not competitive. While others chase individual glory, smart builders are recognizing a fundamental truth: we're stronger together.

We're at an inflection point. The builders who recognize this shift—who move beyond competition toward coordination—will define the next era of innovation. They'll build faster, launch with more support, and grow through collective strength rather than individual struggle.

But if coordination is so powerful, why isn't it happening more? The answer lies in how we've structured collaboration itself.

Part 3 coming up really soon. subscribe here to get notified