The harsh reality of building in 2025: creating software has never been easier and cheaper, but succeeding with it has never been harder.
After hundreds of conversations with builders, the pattern is always the same: iterate, pivot, refine, repeat—until something finally resonates with users. Building towards product-market fit is what they signed up for and what they're passionate about.
But here's what they all discovered: even after finally building something people genuinely love and use, they hit an even bigger wall—distribution.
We live in an era where the cost of building has dropped to nearly zero, yet getting attention for what you've built has become the scarcest resource. Builders have all the tools to create fantastic products, apps, and experiences, but they lack an easy way to attract attention to what they build.
Traditional advertising requires serious cash. Ad networks, influencer partnerships, and paid campaigns are expensive. For bootstrapped builders, spending $5K on ads might mean two months of runway.
Building an audience is a completely different skill set. It's a long, slow journey that requires consistent content creation, community engagement, and personal branding. Many builders just want to build—they didn't sign up to become content creators or social media personalities.
Raising funds has become harder than ever. In a market that moves this fast, even investors are risk-averse. They want to see significant traction before writing checks, creating a chicken-and-egg problem: you need money to gain traction, but you need traction to get money.
This creates a brutal reality: you've built something amazing, but you can't get it in front of the people who need it.
This is where product coins enter the picture—not as a magic solution to all builder problems, but as a new tool in the builder's toolbox.
Product coins represent one potentially powerful approach for bootstrapping ventures:
They reward early supporters and believers
They generate initial funding without traditional fundraising
They enable $0 marketing budget campaigns
But tokens aren't for everyone. Many builders avoid launching tokens because:
It feels like a huge commitment they're not ready for
The mental overhead is overwhelming
It requires maintaining a public profile and constant community engagement
Regulatory and tax concerns create uncertainty
Even those that did launch their own coin, often get stuck at low valuation mcaps, that make it hard to utilize their tokens effectively for development or meaningful incentives.
Tokens were designed as coordination tools—mechanisms to bring people together, align interests, and create shared value. But what if we've been using them all wrong?
What if coins aren't for everyone? What if launching your own token isn't the solution for most builders? What if there's another path you should explore before making that big commitment?
The problem isn't tokens themselves—it's how we've approached them. While builders struggle in isolation, fighting for the same scarce attention, the very tools meant to coordinate and collaborate have become yet another competitive battlefield.
But there's a different way to think about this. Instead of everyone launching their own tokens and competing, what if builders could coordinate first and compete less?
Stay tuned for Part 2 coming soon....
Share Dialog
Lior
Support dialog
optimism and lets go
Optimis 🔥
Bullish 🔥
Part 1: The Builder's Dilemma
After hundreds of conversations with builders, I keep hearing the same story: they crack the code on building something people love, then struggle endlessly to get it noticed. I felt that myself, every-day. Part 1 of 5 pieces I've put together to make sense of the chaos in crypto land and the product coins landscape. This is why I started thinking differently about tokens and coordination 👇
Part 2 - Part 2: Beyond Competition Lies Coordination https://farcaster.xyz/lior/0x80734b25
isn’t it a paradox saying “building something people love, and struggling to get it noticed”? Often times people will just be nice to you in interviews, but if they actually like something- they are your biggest advocates and help others notice it for you. Almost always its the predictable result - not building something people need.
That's a very good point. I think for sure if you don't have something people want, any effort to get it noticed is like filling a broken bucket, but often even having it - you are competing with giants: Corporates with huge distributions VC backed startups with tons of cash spent on ads Other builders with large distribution (from previous ventures, or just well positioned social profiles) All to say - having a great product is a necessary but not sufficient condition for success
1000 $tipn Agree!