100 million $GNOT will be attributed between New Tendermint Inc. and Jae Kwon; the repartition is expected to be communicated publicly.

100 million $GNOT will be given to the Core Mission DAO, which will manage the

1. The point of the governance token is to be staked on the Network for the security of the blockchain. What’s ironic about a single token model is that the more traction a blockchain gets, the more tokens are likely to get unstaked to be used as gas fees, which leads to a decrease of the security of the Network. Having a dual token model addresses this issue.

2. A fixed-constant-inflationary fee token that’s solely dedicated to fueling the contracts of the blockchain will allow users to hold the token in a wallet for future usages without worrying about the value of tokens getting inflated away.community efforts and ecosystem around the project. This DAO is yet to be defined.

3. Majority of end-users are tech-ignorant, meaning that most of them are clueless to which validators they should be supporting and how to evaluate governance proposals. Simply put, the dual token model mitigates the operational risks by offloading the governance responsibilities from the end-users to nodes, validators, and network stakeholders who have an actual understanding of the blockchain.

100 million $GNOT will be attributed between New Tendermint Inc. and Jae Kwon; the repartition is expected to be communicated publicly.

100 million $GNOT will be given to the Core Mission DAO, which will manage the

1. The point of the governance token is to be staked on the Network for the security of the blockchain. What’s ironic about a single token model is that the more traction a blockchain gets, the more tokens are likely to get unstaked to be used as gas fees, which leads to a decrease of the security of the Network. Having a dual token model addresses this issue.

2. A fixed-constant-inflationary fee token that’s solely dedicated to fueling the contracts of the blockchain will allow users to hold the token in a wallet for future usages without worrying about the value of tokens getting inflated away.community efforts and ecosystem around the project. This DAO is yet to be defined.

3. Majority of end-users are tech-ignorant, meaning that most of them are clueless to which validators they should be supporting and how to evaluate governance proposals. Simply put, the dual token model mitigates the operational risks by offloading the governance responsibilities from the end-users to nodes, validators, and network stakeholders who have an actual understanding of the blockchain.