One of the most underrated recent developments in L2 is Fuel. To demonstrate how fast the "modularity-execution layer" can be, they deployed the first Uniswap-like application SwaySwap on the testnet. There are too many places worth digging, for example, it is one of the few execution layers that use the UTXO model ( @NervosNetwork ?), is also the first experimental application of the modular blockchain paradigm.

Founder of Fuel @jadler0 He is also the founder of Celestia. His positioning for Celestia is "modular consensus and data layer", while Ethereum is essentially a trinity of "consensus + data + execution". Fuel is only an execution layer and will access the DA and consensus of Ethereum, but in what form will Celestia collaborate with Fuel in the future?

The word Sway in SwaySwap comes from the programming language in the execution layer of Fuel, which they think solves the shortcomings of Solidity and inherits the advantages of Rust. The virtual machine in the Fuel network is called FuelVM, which improves the performance of EVM, and for EVM smart contract developers, there is no learning cost (also means to rewrite, but not difficult?).

Therefore, compared to OP Rollup and ZK Rollup, although everyone relies on the consensus and DA of Ethereum, Fuel has not completely accommodated EVM compatibility because of its performance, and they are very confident in choosing UTXO for themselves. They even think that "this application should Dispel the wrong idea that the UTXO model has a worse experience than the account model.

One of the most underrated recent developments in L2 is Fuel. To demonstrate how fast the "modularity-execution layer" can be, they deployed the first Uniswap-like application SwaySwap on the testnet. There are too many places worth digging, for example, it is one of the few execution layers that use the UTXO model ( @NervosNetwork ?), is also the first experimental application of the modular blockchain paradigm.

Founder of Fuel @jadler0 He is also the founder of Celestia. His positioning for Celestia is "modular consensus and data layer", while Ethereum is essentially a trinity of "consensus + data + execution". Fuel is only an execution layer and will access the DA and consensus of Ethereum, but in what form will Celestia collaborate with Fuel in the future?

The word Sway in SwaySwap comes from the programming language in the execution layer of Fuel, which they think solves the shortcomings of Solidity and inherits the advantages of Rust. The virtual machine in the Fuel network is called FuelVM, which improves the performance of EVM, and for EVM smart contract developers, there is no learning cost (also means to rewrite, but not difficult?).

Therefore, compared to OP Rollup and ZK Rollup, although everyone relies on the consensus and DA of Ethereum, Fuel has not completely accommodated EVM compatibility because of its performance, and they are very confident in choosing UTXO for themselves. They even think that "this application should Dispel the wrong idea that the UTXO model has a worse experience than the account model.