During a postprandial conversation last Christmas, one of my nieces brought up Taylor Swift’s drama with Carlyle over the sale of her back catalog.

I had recently minted my first music NFT on Sound (Daniel Allan’s “Too Close”), and the potential for crypto to disintermediate industry incumbents and empower artists was top of mind.

Somewhat embarrassingly, in retrospect, I grabbed an unused dessert plate, retrieved a dry-erase marker, and began to diagram two stylistic visions of the world on the flatware.

Something like this:

A crude oversimplification to be sure.

But in my egg nog-fueled enthusiasm, I wanted to inspire my niece with the prospects for a world where:

• Artists would be able to retain the rights to their IP while making a living

• Fans would be able to build direct relationships with artists, and potentially participate in economic upside

• Rent-seeking middlemen would be kicked to the curb … where they belong

Since that dinner, I have collected 80+ music NFTs. The overwhelming majority have been minted on Sound, but I’ve also minted on Beat Foundry, Royal, Glass, Zora, etc.

The pace of development — particularly by the team at Sound — has been astonishing.

It’s still very early days, but I’m finding that music NFTs are the epicenter of crypto-enabled business model innovation.

—

In a landscape burgeoning with scams and vaporware, music NFTs are the first instantiation of web3 I’ve encountered that leverages crypto rails for disruptive innovation in the real world.

This is not why I collect them — I think music NFTs are intrinsically valuable.

That said, music NFTs illuminate multiple vectors for entrepreneurs to build disruptive companies in other verticals.

I’d like to highlight five for non-crypto natives, particularly those managing or investing in private markets funds.

Web3 blows up conventional conceptions of competition.

As noted in Portico’s recent research on the four trends shaping global private markets, large incumbents are rapidly developing their crypto capabilities.

Beyond using web3 as a source of deal flow, they’re seeking to harness blockchain technology to offer an incrementally better service or gain access to a larger customer base (see, for example, Hamilton Lane and KKR tokenizing access to select funds).

But this incrementalism misses the real potential of protocols, which can obviate the need for fund managers entirely.

For example, Sound has created an open, permissionless protocol that enables artists anywhere on earth to create (smart) song contracts for free.

The Sound SDK enables artists to build storefronts on their own webpages (see, for example, Reo Cragun’s Frameworks — listen to Terra Lago — and Daniel Allan’s Glass House Remixes — listen to the msft Remix). (Disclosure: I own NFTs of both songs).

All an artist needs is an audience that is willing to pay for their NFTs.

Admittedly, this is no small feat. However, building a crop of supporters is probably easier than securing a decent deal from a label.

In addition, Sound opened its API so that third parties can build apps over the top. Free music streaming apps, such as Spinamp and Future Tape, are already available for people to discover the latest web3 releases (you can listen to some of my favorites on Spinamp here).

Distribution has been open sourced.

Businesses that rely on black boxes of expertise, “proprietary” relationships / distribution capabilities, or closed ecosystems are under threat.

With respect to private markets in the broader emerging-market complex, I’ve previously shared my thoughts on NFTs and the future of African startup funding, and a high-level concept for a tokenized investment vehicle.

A few months ago, artists relayed that it would take 1 million streams on, say, Spotify, to generate a payout of ~ $3,500. Their fates were tied to algorithms over which they have little to no control.

Today, an artist can release a single on Sound.xyz’s curated platform (distinct from the permissionless protocol) and hit that revenue figure with just 25 collectors.

And unlike time-lagged royalty payments, music NFTs’ smart contracts enable instant payouts — not only for primary releases, but also for cuts of secondary sales.

https://twitter.com/rac/status/1516578113634725890?s=43&t=NhhoywY4warcmmOqM75d6Q

Going direct improves artists’ working capital position. This enables earlier investments in their own branding / capabilities / distribution, and faster experimentation.

In addition, artists can leverage their supporters to crowdfund a project. Daniel Allan pioneered this with his Overstimulated and Malibu raises, which flip the script on the role of intermediaries providing upfront financing with extractive terms.

“Crowdfunding isn’t new,” you may say.

And you would be correct.

However, the fundraises I’ve participated in have transparent treasuries and token-gated voting on the use of funds. There is much to be explored here.

Music NFTs encapsulate Jesse Walden’s thesis on the ownership economy.

Compared to purchasing a vinyl or streaming a digital file, as spinz808.eth has written, owning a music NFT just hits different.

In part, this is a function of economic alignment of interests — you’re vested in the artist’s success, as value should accrue to the NFT over time.

It’s also a function of utility — ownership unlocks access to token-gated experiences, such as free concerts, artist portals (such as RAC’s), and Discord / Telegram channels where you can interact with the artist.

But in an economy organized around debt-fueled consumption, there’s also an intangible quality to participating in the artist’s journey.

To hear Billboard tell it, the music industry faces a problem with pipeline.

Spotify’s algorithms no longer make sense, there is a deluge of content, and TikTok is splintering the vestiges of mass culture.

There’s an old saw about riches in niches, but the article above suggests labels confront an existential crisis. The fragmentation of consumer preferences is obliterating their ability to identify (scalable) talent, and the labels’ historical influence / control over distribution has evaporated.

Social media is fostering an emergent culture, and incumbents appear ill-equipped to harness or capitalize upon emergent phenomena. While legacy intermediaries seem stuck in the starting blocks, the infrastructure in web3 is capable of capitalizing on emergent trends in near-real time.

For instance, in May, Salem Ilese’s TikTok video Crypto Boy went viral. Within 10 days, she listed it on Sound.xyz and raised 86.4 ETH (~ $170,000 on drop day), which she donated to The Center for Reproductive Rights. Since then, it has done ~16 ETH in secondary sales.

As the half-life of a track’s popularity declines and the cadence of production accelerates, the need for speed grows in importance.

There’s another angle to the disappearance of incumbents’ secret sauce that’s worth marinating on — the shift from institution-driven to community-driven growth.

This is a bit philosophical, but in The Wealth of Networks (2006), Yochai Benkler envisioned how the Internet could transform the nature of economic production:

Individual human capacities, rather than the capacity to aggregate financial capital, become the economic core of our information and cultural production. Some of that human capacity is currently, and will continue to be, traded through markets in creative labor. However, its liberation from the constraints of physical capital leaves creative human beings much freer to engage in a wide range of information and cultural production practices than those they could afford to participate in when, in addition to creativity, experience, cultural awareness and time, one needed a few million dollars to engage in information production. From our friendships to our communities we live life and exchange ideas, insights, and expressions in many more diverse relations than those mediated by the market. In the physical economy, these relationships were largely relegated to spaces outside of our economic production system. The promise of the networked information economy is to bring this rich diversity of social life smack into the middle of our economy and our productive lives.

Music NFTs enable you to experience this first-hand. Crypto rails provide the value capture / exchange that had largely been missing.

It’s all a bit nascent and inchoate, but there is an ethos of the cooperative in the music NFT community. Artists are supporting artists. Collectors continue to show up for new drops.

There’s a sense that the community is pulling in the same direction to manifest a different economy — one that gives artists a chance to live off their creativity and talents.

I wonder what Dee Hock would think.

One great feature of open, permissionless communities is that anyone can join them.

Why don’t you join me as a collector?

Sound just launched a marketplace for music NFTs at market.sound.xyz. Why not peruse the site for an artist whose vibe resonates?

Or, keep your eyes peeled for a free, curated mint on sound.xyz.

Experiment and discover for yourself how a different world is possible — indeed, it’s being built every day.

Apart from the intellectual edification, I am confident that if you go in with an open mind, you will uncover insights germane to the future of your own business, and have fun along the way.

See you there.