the original plan for this article was to be filed as a patent for the sake of ownership, but it might get involved with some sort of authority which might cause enormous chaos in the future as a tradeoff.

so here it is, hopefully, this would work.

please bear with me if my phrasing isn’t the most delicate, i haven’t fall asleep for days.

abstract

our world( 99% a simulation) right now is in an extremely interesting and intense chapter. for those who might not be aware, humanity as a whole is facing financial, civil, geopolitical, technical, religious conflicts, etc, at the same time.

the collapse of the population seems even not as significant right now.

so the question is: how long do we have left before any potentially catastrophic events happen? I really do not know, but my very own personal prediction given all the factors I’ve been gathering is: quite soon.

main

is there a way to add something to the dialogue box to postpone the timeline, or ease some tension? I believe so

I would try to use the most straightforward language to phrase the method/mechanism that possibly could stand a chance.

and just like how we used to solve problems, we use technology, but this time we do it with some cautiousness:

please allow me to humbly introduce:

a validating model to control inputs for training llms(or any other forms of AI), with recording every single factor(inputs, outputs, different factors of managing inputs, amount of inputs, methods of inputs, etc)during the process on

immutable databases(possibly blockchain, third-party encrypted database, or distributed hardware SSD controlled by different parties, etc)

then the question leads to who would be the candidates that get to validate?

in order to create a third-party intelligence that is not crazy enough to wipe out the human species and to best serve as a role for our endless desire, here comes the most significant numerical formula:

f(n)=3^n,

n>0, and n has to be an odd number(except n=2).

(inspired by the ancient Chinese Daoism philosophy)

for example:

you and some other investors manage a venture capital, now a long-term critical partner spotted a "unicorn" opportunity that the individual believes would bring great gain for the firm.

the risk/reward of making this bet can be incredibly high, so you want to spread the risk, not making the partner look bad, also possibly not miss the opportunity.

if you have 20 partners, you could set n=2:

3^0+3^1+3^2=13

bring 13 partners to validate the output for your very own decentralized llm that had been trained for making investment decisions

sounds pretty impossible, but with the help of this validating model, it’s achievable

however, you would have to design(or ask you're decentralized ai) "bar"(each hierarchy would have a different standard)for your own candidates based on the nature of your goal. but, there have to be three different parties, to micromanage the

potential conflicts. also, the three parties have to have different ways of operating, but the trade-offs of the three parties likely could offset each other.

what did i mean by that? they all carry the same goal but also operate in their own philosophy.

another example:

if you want to macro manage a gigantic entity,

your might have to split your candidates based on their religion(the narrative that most individuals carry): Christianity---Buddhism---Islam,

then each one of them can split other three branches, like for Christianity: egyptian Coptic---roman catholic---eastern orthodox(just an example)

for those who might wonder why,

why is 3? I would leave it here for those who might be interested:

0 --- 1 --- 2 --- 3 --- n --- n+1 --- n+2 --- n+3 --- n+n --- 2n+1 --- 2n+2 --- 2n +3 --- 3n --- 3n+1 --- 3n+2 --- 3n+3 --- 3n+n --- 3^n --- 3^n+1---3^n+2---3^n+3---3^n+n---n^n---0

I am not able to define the philosophy behind 0^0, and at this moment I believe we will never be, but we can expand consciousness as large as possible to get close to "it". Also, harmony might be the only language the entire universe all shares.

Changping Jia 2023.3.29

the original plan for this article was to be filed as a patent for the sake of ownership, but it might get involved with some sort of authority which might cause enormous chaos in the future as a tradeoff.

so here it is, hopefully, this would work.

please bear with me if my phrasing isn’t the most delicate, i haven’t fall asleep for days.

abstract

our world( 99% a simulation) right now is in an extremely interesting and intense chapter. for those who might not be aware, humanity as a whole is facing financial, civil, geopolitical, technical, religious conflicts, etc, at the same time.

the collapse of the population seems even not as significant right now.

so the question is: how long do we have left before any potentially catastrophic events happen? I really do not know, but my very own personal prediction given all the factors I’ve been gathering is: quite soon.

main

is there a way to add something to the dialogue box to postpone the timeline, or ease some tension? I believe so

I would try to use the most straightforward language to phrase the method/mechanism that possibly could stand a chance.

and just like how we used to solve problems, we use technology, but this time we do it with some cautiousness:

please allow me to humbly introduce:

a validating model to control inputs for training llms(or any other forms of AI), with recording every single factor(inputs, outputs, different factors of managing inputs, amount of inputs, methods of inputs, etc)during the process on

immutable databases(possibly blockchain, third-party encrypted database, or distributed hardware SSD controlled by different parties, etc)

then the question leads to who would be the candidates that get to validate?

in order to create a third-party intelligence that is not crazy enough to wipe out the human species and to best serve as a role for our endless desire, here comes the most significant numerical formula:

f(n)=3^n,

n>0, and n has to be an odd number(except n=2).

(inspired by the ancient Chinese Daoism philosophy)

for example:

you and some other investors manage a venture capital, now a long-term critical partner spotted a "unicorn" opportunity that the individual believes would bring great gain for the firm.

the risk/reward of making this bet can be incredibly high, so you want to spread the risk, not making the partner look bad, also possibly not miss the opportunity.

if you have 20 partners, you could set n=2:

3^0+3^1+3^2=13

bring 13 partners to validate the output for your very own decentralized llm that had been trained for making investment decisions

sounds pretty impossible, but with the help of this validating model, it’s achievable

however, you would have to design(or ask you're decentralized ai) "bar"(each hierarchy would have a different standard)for your own candidates based on the nature of your goal. but, there have to be three different parties, to micromanage the

potential conflicts. also, the three parties have to have different ways of operating, but the trade-offs of the three parties likely could offset each other.

what did i mean by that? they all carry the same goal but also operate in their own philosophy.

another example:

if you want to macro manage a gigantic entity,

your might have to split your candidates based on their religion(the narrative that most individuals carry): Christianity---Buddhism---Islam,

then each one of them can split other three branches, like for Christianity: egyptian Coptic---roman catholic---eastern orthodox(just an example)

for those who might wonder why,

why is 3? I would leave it here for those who might be interested:

0 --- 1 --- 2 --- 3 --- n --- n+1 --- n+2 --- n+3 --- n+n --- 2n+1 --- 2n+2 --- 2n +3 --- 3n --- 3n+1 --- 3n+2 --- 3n+3 --- 3n+n --- 3^n --- 3^n+1---3^n+2---3^n+3---3^n+n---n^n---0

I am not able to define the philosophy behind 0^0, and at this moment I believe we will never be, but we can expand consciousness as large as possible to get close to "it". Also, harmony might be the only language the entire universe all shares.

Changping Jia 2023.3.29