假痴不癲 由克雷格·赖特 发表于博客和推特，11 6月 2019。标题直接采用了四字中文: 假痴不癲. 躲在傻瓜、醉汉或疯子的面具后面,把你的意图和动机的混淆。引诱你的对手低估你的能力,直到,过度自信,放弃了他的防卫。然后你可以攻击了。

译者：他与antisec movement 的斗争一直在持续。。。 以上英文信息均来源网络。本人只是做了一个翻译。不代表任何立场。请审慎阅读。

平行发布于微博：玩poker的喵王

#比特币SV# 和 #中本聪愿景# #比特币# #bitcoin# #BSV# #中本聪# #区块链#

我在2017年公开发布了这一战略。我让人们相信我在做一件基于Twitter角色的事情,他们这样称呼,好像这是他们应该注意的现实。同时,我提交了多篇论文,并在几个学术会议上发表。我目前正在莱斯特大学攻读法学博士学位,在CNAM攻读数学,进展顺利。同时,我们已经提交了近800件专利申请。至少有1280份白皮书正在酝酿中,这些白皮书将实现专利。 同时,该团队设法获得了每秒约 1,000 个交易的持续交易率。到今年年底,我们将能够处理Visa的交易量水平。 在社交媒体上,人们试图告诉你你应该怎么做。他们试图限制和限制你的自由。这是一种共同的社会主义策略,与那些更渴望极权主义的人很相配。但同样,在社交媒体和假新闻之外绕过规则是一个简单的策略。当你避免和忽视它们时,激进主义和激进主义可能会被贬低。Twitterati充其量是蹒跚学步的孩子和三岁的孩子。你对孩子的发脾气没有反应;你教育他们,除非他们在规则范围内比赛,否则他们并不重要。这就是"crypto-sphere."的教训。与e-gold和Liberty Reserve不同,比特币的构建和设计是在规则范围内行事的。 人们不明白的是,反洗钱(AML)规则总是涵盖比特币。Liberty Reserve特意建立系统,允许用假身份交易。我们今天看到的桶店交易所也是如此,比如Binance。自创建各种需要了解您的客户 (KYC) 立法和反洗钱的融资行为以来,通过使用薄弱的反洗钱控制专门吸引在线犯罪分子的系统已纳入法律范围洗钱 (AML) 控制。"资金"一词特别重要。洗钱不需要你一定用钱。任何资金都可以。 Arthur Budovsky以加密货币不是货币为前提,因此洗钱的概念不适用,因此,他对他的洗钱定罪提出上诉。然而,问题在于反洗钱规则包括资金。如果你阅读法律文本,你会发现它包含了一切你可以想象的,从银行账户到现金,从黄金宝石到手表。融资是指为交易提供资金的任何手段。因此,现实情况是,加密货币不会给罪犯藏身之地。 我设计的比特币有一个特定的目标,创建一个系统,不允许罪犯和洗钱促进者轻松绕过系统周围的控制。比特币是假名机制,不能很好地作为一个犯罪系统。这是故意的，要成为法律监管下的资金,该系统需要支持追踪。 如果你寻求创建一个更匿名的系统,正如我们最近在BCH中看到的,随着闪电网络的发展,非法混合器和核心币(BTC)的实现,你会发现一个系统不再在法律范围内运行.一些人认为,他们可以逃脱它,因为比特币是分散的。我们看到情况并非如此,事实再次表明:此类加密货币并非分散化。 人们不明白的是,在法律范围内建立系统,指导和教导那些能够接受这些系统的人,并确保监管机构明白比特币不能以他们无法停止的方式运作,这是最好的服务。

要分布式 要下放权力,一个系统需要权力分权。在开发人员可以更改协议的任何系统中,系统不再分散。在 Internet 协议或 IP 中,没有任何开发人员或开发人员组能够更改协议。使用 RFC 过程,可以进行添加和扩展,通过添加新规则来开发和扩展协议。在技术扩展的情况下,有时成为迁移到新协议的一项要求。在我们的实例中,我们看到 IPv4 和 IPv6 暂时共存。然而,它们是单独的协议。 这个类比适用于比特币这样的系统。

比特币的天然特性就是一旦他的0.1版发布后，核心设计就要在其之后的生涯中坚若磐石。

要分布式加密货币,需要将其设置为一成不变。 这同样不适用于比特币(BTC)。协议开发人员可以更改任何加密资产以更改事务的性质,以便它可以更改于今天签署的交易的格式在未来 20 年内的某个时间失效,因此它是集中化系统。创造分散的东西非常简单;您需要以这样一种方式启动加密货币:

1. 创建固定的协议集。

2. 不允许在时间之外为创建者和其他投资者提供预挖矿或特殊利益。

3. 启动系统时没有系统内在值。

4. 允许个人在保护网络和验证交易方面赚取收入。

这种系统的要求是,规则设置在系统发布当天。我用比特币这样做了。我们的节点实现,比特币SV节点,将允许您采取在2009年签署的交易,并知道您将能够重播相同的交易,并接受网络上的节点 - 如果它是有效的 - 在2100年。这就是分布式的含义。这就是为什么系统,如以太坊和核心币(BTC)与比特币截然不同。

我们有一些事要解决。已附加在比特币上的付费脚本哈希 (P2SH) 形式的更改将在年内删除 - 保留原始内容并删除旨在帮助促进非法活动的系统。当谈论替代币,如核心币(BTC),我们需要注意到,他们有很大的区别,比特币。他们渴望建立一个匿名系统,这让他们在e-gold和自由储备中所面临的情景。非法融资系统可以被关闭。比特币克隆和不良副本没有什么不同,可以被关闭。系统分布式本身并不能阻止它,事实上,这是简化流程的一个点。

比特币是一个不可改变的证据线索。每个节点都维护记录,这允许检察官使用无法删除的不可变记录跟踪跟踪资金路径。它是故意的。比特币不是匿名的。它被设计成通过形成更好的东西来摧毁匿名加密货币。

不存在分布式交易所之类的东西 简单地说,交易所都有所有者。它们不是由计算机资助的。有些人犯的错误是认为权力下放适用于系统。权力的分权是法律上的问题。要分散系统,您需要分散控制。当我们谈论交流时,他们必须在法律范围内行事。如果他们不在法律范围内,如果他们不遵循反洗钱控制,没有任命的人担任各自的职位,那么他们很容易被拿下。分布式在许多系统中与在许多人中分配权力不是一回事。分布式交换仅在系统分发时进行分发,这在法律下并不重要。要依法分配,您需要以权力进行分配。当您拥有 Binance 等系统,这些系统误导和欺骗客户,使他们相信他们使用的是分布式交易所时,它们总是被集中化。集中化来自所有权和控制。Binance 内的个人拥有控制权,因此系统没有分布式。 如果我们看一下像BTC这样的东西,我们看到它是令人难以置信的集中。开发者们改变了协议。自从2017年放弃比特币,并开始了一个克隆,正在传递和误导投资者以来,他们就这样做了。它是集中的,因为一些核心开发人员设置的策略,允许系统被控制。他们没有改变所有规则这个并不重要。仅仅他们就能改变一些规则,就意味着他们控制了系统。

拿下非法加密货币非常简单 试图误导投资者相信像BTC这样的公司是分布式的，开发商这样做是为了从投资者那里获得欺诈性收益。

为了合法,像BTC这样的系统不能从比特币分裂出去。当您拆分加密货币时,您是在欺骗和误导投资者。BTC分裂系统与添加隔离鉴证,删除了比特币的关键方面,徒劳的愿望,使的它有罪犯的吸引力。BTC分裂了,复制比特币,简单地发明制作新的,更匿名的比特币版本,这是自丝绸之路崩溃以来核心开发者的目标。

他们要学到的是,比特币只有在法律范围内才能有弹性和稳健。简单地取下基于区块链的系统,这些系统偏离了比特币设定的路径,成为一个在法律范围内工作的系统。一旦你允许恐怖分子的资助,你可以开始瞄准矿工。一旦你允许一个系统,旨在变得更加匿名,并绕过控制,你是在开发一个放开的管辖权捕获。法院可以命令矿工冻结交易。如果矿工不听法院的话,其资产就会被没收。在洗钱案件中,可以跨法域扣押犯罪资产。从西班牙引渡自由储备的创始人以及美国官员从哥斯达黎加获取资金都可以看到这一点。

技术功能的加入,使的比特币克隆体,如BTC对于矿工的法律行动更匿名 。犯罪收益规则的允许使得故意从未知非法地址验证交易的矿工自己成为目标。2020 年 1 月在欧洲和世界上其他国家生效的反洗钱规则的修改特别包括加密货币,并使执法方案变得简单。一旦发生,那些旨在便利非法活动的系统,如涉及闪电网络、机密交易和增强匿名性的系统,将看到支持他们的矿工的设备被查封。

开发人员看不到的是,作为社交网络或开源项目的一部分并不能免除您的法律。它所做的只是取消对公司结构的保护。作为开发人员,您可以对组中其他开发人员的行为负责。以前也发生过这种情况,对分布式开发人员群体(包括刑事案件)采取的行动可追溯到 1990 年代。

我要向Antonopoulos 先生表示衷心感谢,他正在帮助确保所有非法和无用的加密货币,如Monero 和核心币(BTC)都是非法的。由于他们公然错误声明分布式交易所、闪电和其他旨在违反反洗钱法律和便利犯罪的系统,这些个人正在帮助确保您有一天醒悟,找到 BTC、Monero 和Zcash是违法犯罪资产,单纯占有也为犯罪。但至少在警察逮捕你之前,你将能够摧毁你现在毫无价值的资产。

如果不是像他这样的人,我的工作和让执法部门去理解这种区块链将更加困难。我想,那些寻求正义、法律和秩序的人有必要让罪犯站在另一边来陈述案情。他们如此无能地宣传犯罪,这是非常有帮助的。

我一度那样行事,允许那些反对我观点的人积极站出来,说出他们的"防弹系统"将如何使他们隐藏和逃避监管,并在国际反洗钱框架之外采取行动。例如,Binance炫耀它作为一个犯罪友好的洗钱网站。它积极促进清洗核心币 (BTC) 和其他加密货币的能力。不幸的是,对于它的客户来说,很少提到对系统的扣押将如何导致完全捕获所有资产。有一天,Binance 的客户会醒来,发现他们的所有资产都被查封、被盗或盗用。这就是在标榜法律的犯罪交易所做生意的成本。

Feign Madness but Keep Your Balance By Craig Wright | 11 Jun 2019 | Alternative Coins & Systems

(假痴不癲／假痴不癫, Jiǎ chī bù diān) Hide behind the mask of a fool, a drunk, or a madman to create confusion about your intentions and motivations. Lure your opponent into underestimating your ability until, overconfident, he drops his guard. Then you may attack.

I posted the strategy publicly in 2017. I left people believing that I was doing one thing based on the Twitter persona, which they addressed as if it was a reality they should take note of. At the same time, I filed multiple papers and have presented at several academic conferences. My two PhDs that I’m currently doing, in law at the University of Leicester and applied mathematics at CNAM, are going well. At the same time, we have filed just under 800 patent applications. There are at least 1280 white papers in the pipeline that will lead to patents. Simultaneously, the team has managed to obtain a sustained transaction rate of around 1,000 transactions per second. By the end of the year, we will be able to handle a transaction volume the level of Visa. In social media, people try to tell you how you should act. They seek to limit and restrict your freedom. It is a common socialist ploy, and fits well with those of a more totalitarian power-hungry bent. But equally, it is a simple strategy to bypass rules outside of social media and fake news. Hactivism and activism may be defanged when you avoid and ignore them. The Twitterati are at best toddlers and three-year-olds in the act of a tantrum. You don’t respond to a tantrum from a child; you teach them that they don’t matter unless they play within the rules. Such is the lesson for the “crypto-sphere.” Unlike e-gold and Liberty Reserve, Bitcoin was built and designed to act within the rules. What people fail to understand is that anti-money laundering (AML) rules always covered Bitcoin. Liberty Reserve purposely set up systems that allowed to trade with false identities. We see the same with bucket-shop exchanges such as Binance today. Systems that set themselves up to specifically appeal to online criminals through the use of weak anti-money laundering controls have been covered under law since the creation of various funding acts requiring know your customer (KYC) legislation and anti-money laundering (AML) controls. The word ‘funding’ is particularly important. Money laundering doesn’t require you to use money. Any funding applies. Arthur Budovsky appealed his conviction for money laundering using the premise that cryptocurrencies were not money and hence the concept of money laundering would not apply. The problem, though, is that anti-money laundering rules cover funding. If you read the text of the law, you will find that it incorporates everything that you could possibly imagine, from bank accounts to cash to golden gems to watches. Funding means any means of funding a transaction. So the reality is that cryptocurrency does not give criminals a place to hide. I designed Bitcoin with the particular goal of creating a system that did not allow criminals and money-laundering facilitators to easily bypass the controls around the system. Bitcoin is pseudonymous, and does not work well as a criminal system. Which was intentional. To be money under the law, the system needs to support tracing. If you seek to create a more anonymous system, as we have seen recently in BCH with the implementation of illicit mixers and in Core coin (BTC) with the development of the Lightning Network, what you will find is a system that no longer operates within the legal boundaries. Some think that they can get away with it because Bitcoin is decentralised. We are seeing that such is not the case, but then again: such cryptocurrencies are not decentralised. FIOD haalt crypto-witwasdienst Bestmixer offline De Financiële Inlichtingen- en Opsporingsdiensten, of FIOD, heeft een witwaswebsite voor cryptovaluta offline gehaald…tweakers.net What people fail to understand is that I was best served for a while building systems within the law and in instructing and teaching people who could take them and ensure that regulatory bodies understood that Bitcoin could not operate in a way that they could not stop. To Be Decentralised To be decentralised, a system requires the decentralisation of power. In any system where the developers can alter the protocol, the system is no longer decentralised. In the Internet protocol or IP, no developer or developer group is capable of altering the protocol. Using the RFC process, additions and extensions can be made that develop and grow the protocol through the addition of new rules. In the case of technological expansion, it sometimes becomes a requirement to move to new protocols. In our instance, we see IPv4 and IPv6 coexisting for the time being. Yet, they are separate protocols. The analogy applies in a system like Bitcoin.

For a cryptocurrency to be decentralised, it needs to be set in stone. The same does not apply to just Bitcoin. Any cryptographic asset that can be altered by the protocol developers to change the nature of transactions such that it could alter the format making a transaction signed today become invalid some time within the next 20 years is centralised. Creating something that is decentralised is very simple; you need to launch a cryptocurrency in such a way:

1. Create a set fixed protocol.

2. Allow no pre-mines or special benefits outside of time for the creator and other investors.

3. Start the system with no value that is intrinsic in the system.

4. Allow individuals to earn in securing the network and validating transactions. The requirements of such a system are that the rules are set on the day that the system is released. I did so with Bitcoin. Our node implementation, the Bitcoin SV Node, will allow you to take a transaction signed in 2009 and know that you will be able to replay the same transaction and have it accepted by nodes on the network — if it is valid — in the year 2100. Such is what decentralised means. It is why systems such as Ethereum and Core coin (BTC) differ radically from Bitcoin. We have some things to fix. The alterations such as in the form of pay-to-script hash (P2SH) that have been tacked onto Bitcoin will be removed within the year — leaving the original and removing the systems that are designed to help facilitate illicit activity. When talking about alternative coins such as Core coin (BTC), we need to note that they differ greatly from Bitcoin. Their desire to make an anonymous system leaves them in a scenario faced by e-gold and Liberty Reserve. Illegal funding systems can be taken down. Bitcoin clones and poor copies are no different, and can be taken down. Decentralisation of systems alone does not stop it, and in fact is a point that simplifies the process. Bitcoin is an immutable evidence trail. Every single node maintains records, which allows prosecutors to trace the path of money with an immutable record trail that cannot be deleted. It was always intentional. Bitcoin was not designed to be anonymous. It was designed to destroy anonymous cryptocurrencies by forming something that was far better. There are no such things as decentralised exchanges. To put it simply, exchanges all have owners. They are not funded by computers. The error that some people make is thinking that decentralisation applies to systems. The decentralisation of power is the issue under law. For a system to be decentralised, you need to decentralise control. When we are talking about exchanges, they have to act within the law. If they’re not within the law, if they’re not following anti-money laundering controls and do not have people appointed to respective positions, then they are simple to take down. Being distributed across many systems is not the same thing as having power distributed amongst many people. Distributed exchanges are only distributed as far as the systems are distributed, which does not matter under law. To be distributed under law, you need to be distributed in power. When you have systems such as Binance that misleadingly and fraudulently deceive customers in making them believe that they are using a distributed exchange, they are always centralised. Centralisation comes from ownership and control. Individuals within Binance have control, and hence the system is not decentralised. If we look at something like BTC, we see that it is incredibly centralised. The developers change the protocol, and have done so since they abandoned Bitcoin in 2017 and started a clone that is passing off and misleading investors. It is centralised because a few Core developers set the policy that allows the system to be controlled. It does not matter that they don’t change all of the rules; the mere fact that they can change some of the rules means that they control the system. It is simple to take down illegal cryptocurrencies. The developers who are seeking to mislead investors into believing that something like BTC is decentralised do so in order to fraudulently gain money from investors. To be legitimate, a system such as BTC cannot split away from Bitcoin. When you split a cryptocurrency, you are defrauding and misleading investors. BTC split with the addition of Segregated Witness and a system that removed the key aspects of Bitcoin in a vain desire to make something that is attractive to criminals. BTC split away, and copied Bitcoin to simply invent a way of making a new, more anonymous version of Bitcoin, which has been the goal of the Core developers since the collapse of Silk Road. What they’re going to learn is that Bitcoin is only resilient and robust when it acts within the law. It is very simple to take down blockchain-based systems that stray away from the path set by Bitcoin in being a system that works within the law. Once you allow terrorist funding, you can start targeting miners. Once you allow for a system that is designed to become more anonymous and bypass the controls that were developed when I built Bitcoin, you create a system that is open to jurisdictional capture. A court can order a miner to freeze a transaction. If the miner does not listen to the court, its assets can be seized. The seizure of criminal assets is possible across jurisdictions in the case of money laundering. It was seen in the extradition from Spain of the founder of Liberty Reserve and the capture of funds from Costa Rica by the US officials. The addition of technological features that make Bitcoin clones like BTC more anonymous opens miners up to legal action. Proceeds of crime rules allow miners who knowingly act to validate a transaction from an unknown illicit address to become targets themselves. The changes to the anti-money laundering rules that come into effect in January 2020 throughout Europe and in other countries around the world specifically include cryptocurrencies, and make the scenario simple for law enforcement to apply. Once it occurs, systems that are designed to facilitate illegal activities such as those involving the Lightning Network, confidential transactions, and enhanced anonymity will see miners supporting them having their equipment seized. What developers fail to see is that being part of a social network or an open-source project does not exempt you from law. All it does is remove the protections of a corporate structure. As a developer, you can be liable for the actions of other developers in the group. The same has occurred before, and actions on distributed developer groups including criminal cases date to the 1990s.

I would like to add a big thank you to Mr Antonopoulos who is helping ensure that all of the illegitimate and useless cryptocurrencies such as Monero and Core coin (BTC) are made illegal. With their blatantly erroneous statements about decentralised exchanges, Lightning, and other systems designed to breach anti-money laundering laws and facilitate crime, such individuals are helping ensure that you will wake up one day and find BTC, Monero, and Zcash to be illegal criminal assets and the mere possession to be a crime. But at least you will be able to destroy your now worthless holdings before the police arrests you. If it wasn’t for people like him, my job and getting law enforcement to understand such kinds of the blockchain would be much harder. I guess it is necessary for those seeking justice, law, and order to have criminals on the other side to make the case. It’s very helpful that they’re so incredibly incompetent when promoting crime.

In acting as I did for a time, I have allowed those opposing my vision to actively come out saying how their “bullet-proof systems” will enable them to hide and avoid regulation and act outside of the international anti-money laundering frameworks. Binance, for instance, flaunts how it acts as a criminal-friendly money-laundering site. It actively promotes the ability to launder Core coin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies. Unfortunately for its clients, there is little mentioned about how a seizure of the system would result in a complete capture of all assets. One day, clients of Binance will awaken and find that all of their assets have been seized, stolen, or embezzled. Then, such is the cost of doing business on a criminal exchange that flaunts law.

来自 https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/feign-madness-but-keep-your-balance/