Column/New waves of opinion leaders (Bkopleader) writer Banni

This is a humiliated flood.

What is the nature of the mistake of popularity that he has committed?

Many women are outraged, and they say: How can women get down? Do you see women’s workplaces and contributions to the family? These comments were made because the friends of the network watched only one of the words of the pupil teachers. Teachers are speaking about the impact of social evaluation standards on the direction of education, as exemplified by the impact of female values on men’s efforts. It concerns ideas and does not involve conduct. It would be interesting to say that if women’s values fell, society as a whole would be affected.

Until the next teacher is an example, the sentence may be cherished.

She said that the mistakes made by the teachers were not to understand gender equality.

That is no mistake. In the house of teachers and in this speech, women are placed in a higher position than men, and women are not left behind to lead to the collapse of the State.

Ironically, a girl-smart star, who is cherished with a horse, and who educates girls to buy more than one carat, criticizes the monkey. Teachers have also received some praise, not just the first half of the teacher’s criticism, “the poor conscience but the need to earn money, which is the criterion for many Chinese girls to choose men …

Today, when teachers speak so badly, tomorrow may be the same.

The same logic is that today you endorse the rainy “gender equality” doctrine, which may require men’s friends to buy more than one carat of drilling tomorrow.

There have also been calls for the screaming of teachers’ behaviour: “I think that in a patriarchal society, women will never have such a great deal of strength and the responsibility to die should be borne by men. However, to the author of a man, it is a man who has not paid any money to do so. “

It is the reason that a person in charge of education speaks about this.

However, it goes on to say another sentence: “I is not going to be sure of the worst evils to assume Chinese. “You have taken this opportunity to push the reasons for social distress to an education worker, and your malicious intentions are obvious.

The most moderate and rational sum is that his words are silent. It is not thoughtful that the meaning expressed is misplaced.

Frequently speaking outside, it is difficult to avoid mistakes. But there is no promise that, since you are public figures and speak on the public, more attention should be paid to language.

A number of key figures are therefore prepared to avoid such mistakes.

But what is it?

A number of years ago, the headmaster of the Chinese People’s University had misinterpreted the words “July-long fire”, and this year, a new director of the North, who had read the message “Hon-Hunghao”.

Who can give me an option to stop mistakes? Who can say that he has never been mistaken?

Over the years, many men have grown before the public. Vilnius teachers have been convicted of verbal offences, while more have been convicted of acts. “The wrongs committed by men in the middle of the day” and the encouragement of women to become Liu-Dundi.

As an independent and unfailing woman, if let me choose a man, I would like to choose a puppet teacher who has abused me. They may have been pitted by my commitment to Dunvendi or by accepting the honey language of men who have money. Are those women who come with them really given status and dignity?

A considerable number of friends of the network were able to understand whether the puppet teachers were not deliberately demeaning women, and Chineses were not, for many time, inexpensive, but too, intelligent and emotional.

It is not known, however, whether you agree, and I feel that this spectacular indignation does not promote the advancement of women or the achievement of equality between women and men. It is only the puppet teacher who has been given sticks.

One of the personal resilience of the deaf teachers is to speak out, and I am not surprised if, as a result, he is less dreadful. The next time that women really need to pursue their rights will not have a strong voice in support.

(The author of this paper describes the presence of domestic law institutions, PE agencies, now engaged in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Author. (b) The situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo;

Column/New waves of opinion leaders (Bkopleader) writer Banni

This is a humiliated flood.

What is the nature of the mistake of popularity that he has committed?

Many women are outraged, and they say: How can women get down? Do you see women’s workplaces and contributions to the family? These comments were made because the friends of the network watched only one of the words of the pupil teachers. Teachers are speaking about the impact of social evaluation standards on the direction of education, as exemplified by the impact of female values on men’s efforts. It concerns ideas and does not involve conduct. It would be interesting to say that if women’s values fell, society as a whole would be affected.

Until the next teacher is an example, the sentence may be cherished.

She said that the mistakes made by the teachers were not to understand gender equality.

That is no mistake. In the house of teachers and in this speech, women are placed in a higher position than men, and women are not left behind to lead to the collapse of the State.

Ironically, a girl-smart star, who is cherished with a horse, and who educates girls to buy more than one carat, criticizes the monkey. Teachers have also received some praise, not just the first half of the teacher’s criticism, “the poor conscience but the need to earn money, which is the criterion for many Chinese girls to choose men …

Today, when teachers speak so badly, tomorrow may be the same.

The same logic is that today you endorse the rainy “gender equality” doctrine, which may require men’s friends to buy more than one carat of drilling tomorrow.

There have also been calls for the screaming of teachers’ behaviour: “I think that in a patriarchal society, women will never have such a great deal of strength and the responsibility to die should be borne by men. However, to the author of a man, it is a man who has not paid any money to do so. “

It is the reason that a person in charge of education speaks about this.

However, it goes on to say another sentence: “I is not going to be sure of the worst evils to assume Chinese. “You have taken this opportunity to push the reasons for social distress to an education worker, and your malicious intentions are obvious.

The most moderate and rational sum is that his words are silent. It is not thoughtful that the meaning expressed is misplaced.

Frequently speaking outside, it is difficult to avoid mistakes. But there is no promise that, since you are public figures and speak on the public, more attention should be paid to language.

A number of key figures are therefore prepared to avoid such mistakes.

But what is it?

A number of years ago, the headmaster of the Chinese People’s University had misinterpreted the words “July-long fire”, and this year, a new director of the North, who had read the message “Hon-Hunghao”.

Who can give me an option to stop mistakes? Who can say that he has never been mistaken?

Over the years, many men have grown before the public. Vilnius teachers have been convicted of verbal offences, while more have been convicted of acts. “The wrongs committed by men in the middle of the day” and the encouragement of women to become Liu-Dundi.

As an independent and unfailing woman, if let me choose a man, I would like to choose a puppet teacher who has abused me. They may have been pitted by my commitment to Dunvendi or by accepting the honey language of men who have money. Are those women who come with them really given status and dignity?

A considerable number of friends of the network were able to understand whether the puppet teachers were not deliberately demeaning women, and Chineses were not, for many time, inexpensive, but too, intelligent and emotional.

It is not known, however, whether you agree, and I feel that this spectacular indignation does not promote the advancement of women or the achievement of equality between women and men. It is only the puppet teacher who has been given sticks.

One of the personal resilience of the deaf teachers is to speak out, and I am not surprised if, as a result, he is less dreadful. The next time that women really need to pursue their rights will not have a strong voice in support.

(The author of this paper describes the presence of domestic law institutions, PE agencies, now engaged in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Author. (b) The situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo;